102 - Texas Optometric Association

8 downloads 62 Views 5MB Size Report
1. A. Paul Chous, MA, OD, FAAO. Tacoma, WA. Diabetic Eye Disease: .... hypercoaguability (↑PAI-1) ... 386 mg/dl. 65 mg/dl. 101 mg/dl. 136 mg/dl. 350 mg /dl. 314 mg/dl. 12%. 8%. 279 mg/ ..... Endothelial Shear Stress = RPP x Resistivity Index.
Disclosures

Diabetic Eye Disease: Biochemistry, Ocular Hemodynamics & Some New Strategies For Prevention

I am or have been a consultant for, been on advisory boards of, or spoken on behalf of: Bausch & Lomb, Freedom Meditech, GlaxoSmithKline, Kestrel, Kowa, LifeMed Media, Prodigy Diabetes Care, Risk Medical Solutions, Vision Service Plan, ZeaVision

A. Paul Chous, MA, OD, FAAO

None of these affiliations have affected the content of this presentation

Tacoma, WA

Why Should We Care About This Topic?

Why We Should Care 

After all…… 



Laser photocoagulation is highly effective at reducing severe vision loss from diabetic retinopathy Tight metabolic control of diabetes significantly reduces risk

loss, poor night vision) 







Diabetes – A “Growth Industry” 



Prevalence

Optometrists care for the eyes of the majority of Americans with diabetes Most people with diabetes have suboptimal metabolic control Some people with good metabolic control still develop severe DR Diabetes is a “Growth Industry”

Metabolic Control in US Diabetes Patients 

> 50% have A1c > 7%

J Clin Hypertens 2010 Oct;12(10):826-32.

27 Million Americans 1.8 million with type 1 diabetes 18.5 million with type 2 diabetes 9 million undiagnosed



Incidence



1.9 million new cases annually (US)

Photocoagulation doesn’t always work & has significant functional sequellae (VF

Per AACE guidelines, half of patients with T2DM are on inappropriate meds Arch Intern Med. 2008 Oct 27;168(19):2088-94

Up to 70% of patients with diabetes have blood pressure levels above target J Gen Intern Med. 2008 May;23(5):588-94

1

Epidemiology of Diabetes

By 2030

190 million cases world wide; 333 million by 2020 (WHO) 79 million Americans have “prediabetes” Impaired Fasting Glucose and/or

500,000,000 People Will Have Diabetes

Impaired Glucose Tolerance

IDF 2013 State of Diabetes Report

US Healthcare Costs Attributable to Diabetes, 2012

Good Control Does NOT Eliminate Risk of Severe DR

For Patients of All Ages: Total = $245 Billion Drugs $50 billion



Hospital inpatient days $98 billion

Outpatient care* $58 billion Nursing home days $39 billion

Estimated that by 2020 1/3 of US healthcare dollars will be spent on diabetes



10 year risk of PDR and/or CSME in a newly Dx patient with A1c = 6.5% and BP = 120/80 is nearly 4% With mild NPDR the 10 yr risk is 8.4% Diabetologia. 2011 Oct;54(10):2525-32

American Diabetes Association. Diabetes Care. 2008 Mar;31(3):596-615.

Patient JK – 62 yo male Dx with

T2DM x 6 years and A1c < 6.2% and BP < 125/84 since diagnosis

DR – some real numbers 

Pooled analysis from almost 23k with DM • • • •

34.6% prevalence for any DR 6.96% for PDR 6.81% for DME 10.2% for Vision Threatening DR (PDR and/or DME) • All DR end points increased with DM duration, A1c & BP  Higher in people with T1DM compared w T2DM 

Worldwide: 93M w DR, 17M PDR, 21M DME, 28M VTDR

Yao et al. Prevalence of DR. Diabetes Care . March 2012

2

Other Ocular Diseases More Common in Diabetes      

Cataract Glaucoma Dry Eye & Keratopathy Efferent Cranial Neuropathy Ischemic Optic Neuropathy Retinal Vascular Occlusion

Pathophysiology 



Most Diabetes Complications Can Be Broadly Classified as Affecting Small Blood Vessels (Microvascular) or Large Blood Vessels (Macrovascular)

Complications 



Diabetes is the Sixth Leading Cause of Death in the US (estimates range from 100-400 thousand/yr) due to cardiovascular and cerebrovascular disease Based on CDC estimates, diabetes complications kill five times as many Americans each year as do AIDS and breast cancer combined

Basic Biochemistry of Diabetes Complications

Many complications share the same underlying biochemistry Glucose Molecule

Diabetes Causes Multiple Metabolic Abnormalities 

Hyperglycemia (IR and/or loss of beta cells)



Dyslipidemia (small, dense LDL & sticky platelets)

 

Hypertension (stiff vessels, sludgy blood) Increased Formation of Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS)

•Some tissue and cell types are insulin independent •Retina •Renal Glomeruli GLUT-4 •Aorta •Neuronal microvessels This makes these sites susceptible to hyperglycemic insult

3

Insulin Resistance and Hyperglycemia are Associated with Dyslipidemia & Endothelial Dysfunction

Macrovascular Complications of Diabetes

Elevated triglycerides, CRP, LDL & FFAs Increased CAMs (ICAM-1) increase leukocyte adhesion to vessel walls Glycation of LDL particles makes them smaller & denser (ie more atherogenic) Increased platelet aggregation and decreased fibrinolysis causes a state of hypercoaguability (hPAI-1)

Oxidative Stress

Endothelial Dysfunction

Pathophysiology 

Coronary Artery Disease Cerebrovascular Disease Peripheral Vascular Disease

Hypercoaguability Vasoconstriction Inflammation

Ocular Sequellae with Shared Mechanism: Retinal Vascular Occlusion NAION Diabetic Retinopathy

Disease

Fatty Acid Oxidation in Macrovascular Disease

Macrovascular Insult

Mitigating Macrovascular Insult (ADA 2014 Standards) 

Treat dyslipidemia – Glycemic control, statins, ASA



Physical activity & dietary modification – Decrease insulin resistance and hyperinsulinemia – Weight loss to decrease VAT stores



Tighten glycemic control – Minimize glycation of LDL-C & vessel walls

Source: Diabetes: American Diabetes Association, 2005



Lower blood pressure

4

Pathophysiology Microvascular Complications of Diabetes



Microvascular Insult Retinopathy Nephropathy Neuropathy Four biochemical pathways:

polyol, AGE, hexosamine, PKC

Pathophysiology 

Glucose Metabolism

Blood vessel damage in diabetes is caused by four distinct biochemical pathways driven by mitochondrial production of ROS

Glucose Glucose-6-phosphate Fructose-6-phosphate

Intracellular Glucose & FFAs

Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate GAPDH

mitochondria ATP + hSuperoxide (O2-)

Lactate

Glucose Metabolism 



1,3 Diphosphoglycerate

Mitochondrian

Any increase in glucose concentration or decrease in GAPDH results in accumulation of these intermediate glucose metabolites These intermediate metabolites drive production of injurious compounds

Glucose Metabolism Glucose

Pyruvate & ATP

ROS

Polyol Pathway

Glucose-6-phosphate Fructose-6-phosphate Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate GAPDH 1,3 Diphosphoglycerate

Hexosamine Flux Protein Kinase C Advanced Glycation Endproducts

(harmless metabolite)

5

AGEs and PKC  

AGEs- The Maillard Reaction

Strongly implicated in DR AGEs = advanced glycation endproducts – Irreversible glucose-protein bonds – Play a role in retinopathy, nephropathy, neuropathy, CVD, Alzheimer’s



PKC = protein kinase C – Damages blood-retinal barrier – Recruits VEGF

Diabetes Diagnosis in the ECP’s Office 

Measurement of fluorescence (AGEs) in the lens is a biomarker of long-term glycemic stress • The ClearPath DS-120 is designed for early detection of DM by patient comparison with age-matched norms (Freedom-Meditech)

Glycemic Variability 

• Superior accuracy to blood tests • FDA clearance 2/2013

 

Blood glucose fluctuation generates more ROS than does static hyperglycemia Larger “glycemic excursions”

hO2-

Glycemic variability induces apoptosis of retinal capillary endothelial cells by up-regulating NF-kappa b

Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology, November 2012

Glycosylated Hemoglobin (%) vs. Mean Plasma Glucose (mg/dl) 13% 12% 11% 10% 9% 8% 7% 6% 5% 4%

Excellent

386 mg/dl 350 mg/dl 314 mg/dl 279 mg/dl 243 mg/dl 208 mg/dl 172 mg/dl 136 mg/dl 101 mg/dl Control 65 mg/dl

HbA1C 

HbA1C is directly correlated to blood sugar averages, but says nothing about the consistency or stability of glycemic control 136, 132, 140, 135, 137

a HbA1C = 6.0%

48, 204, 240, 32, 87, 205

a HbA1C = 6.0%

6

Glycemic Variability in the DCCT 



Intensively managed patients had a 50-60% reduced risk for developing DR compared with conventionally managed patients having identical HbA1c values After 14 years of follow-up (EDIC), there was a 58% reduced risk of major cardiovascular events in the intensive group after controlling for HbA1c

A1c Variability Matters! • 5 year cumulative incidence of laser Tx for DR in 1459 T1DM pts with highest (19%) vs lowest (10%) A1c variability controlling for mean A1c, duration, BP, kidney status, gender – 70% increase risk of PDR in hi SD group Diabetologia. 2013 Jan 13

Is There Anything More We Can Do?

Management of DR  

 

Prevention of Diabetes! Delay onset of DR by optimizing metabolic control, patient education and adherence to the treatment plan Annual dilated eye exams Laser and/or intravitreal injections for STR if and when necessary

What Causes Diabetic Retinopathy? • A number of complex and inter-related biochemical and hemodynamic factors – – – – – – – – –

Hyperglycemia Hypertension Inflammatory Dyslipidemia Oxidative Stress Release and Suppression of Growth Factors Hormonal influences Apoptosis Up-regulation of inflammatory cytokines BRB breakdown and hypoxia

7

Diabetes Hypertension

Growth Factors TGF PDGF IGF VEGF

BDNF PEDF

RAAS AGEs ET-1

Dyslipidemia

Atherogenic LDL

Hyperglycemia

Hormones

Cortisol GH

Mitochondrial ROS

AGEs

Hexosamine

PKC

Polyol

Can we use medical or nutritional therapies to bite the hands that Feed Diabetic Retinopathy?

Oxidative Stress

1. Blood Glucose Medications 2. Blood Pressure Medications

Apoptosis

Inflammation

RGCs/Inner Retina Capillary Endothelium

NFkB TNF-a, IL-6, MMP, kallikrein, ICAM

3. Meds for dyslipidemia

Diabetic Retinopathy BRB Breakdown Hypoxia/Neovascularization

ACEIs/ARBs & Retinopathy

Blood Glucose Control

Vasotec® (enalapril) and Cozaar® (losartan) reduced the risk of DR progression by 65% and 70% in T1DM NEJM 2009;361: 40-51

Meta-analysis of the DCCT and UKPDS shows that:

Captopril reduces DR progression 40% and DME 30% in T2DM Chin Med J (Engl) 2012 Jan;125(2):287-92

Each 10% Reduction in HbA1C Lowers the Risk of DRT Progression By 43%

Should these agents become standard treatment of DR?

This linear reduction in risk holds for HbA1C between 5% and 8%

-prils and –sartans may lower DR Risk of Progression

Drugs. 2010 Dec 3;70(17):2229-45.

Lipid Agents & Retinopathy Simvistatin + Fenofibrate therapy lowers the risk of DR progression by 35% (and need for laser by 31%) compared to simvistatin alone in pts with T2DM and high cardiovascular risk (n = 2856) ACCORD Eye Study, N Engl J Med. 2010 Jul 15;363(3):233-44 Consistent with FIELD Study showing reduced progression of DR and need for laser Tx

Biting the Hands of DR Might Also Entail Strategies That: 

Reduce ROS and harmful glucose metabolites (AGEs, PKC, Polyol, hexosamine)



Reduce nfKB ‘switch’ that activates inflammation



Reduce inflammatory cytokines



Reduce/Block VEGF/TGF and augment BDNF/PEDF



Prevent capillary/pericyte/RGC apoptosis



Seal leaky retinal capillaries

Lancet 2007 370(9600):687-97

Add-on Fenofibrate lowers risk of DR progression in T2DM

8

Lutein & Zeaxanthin

Micro-Nutrient Candidates? Mitochondrial anti-oxidants, block nf-Kb, reduce Harmful glucose metabolites, inhibit lipid peroxides        

Lutein & Zeaxanthin Vitamin D Resveratrol Curcumin EPA/DHA Coenzyme Q-10 Quercetin Green Tea Extract

       

Benfotiamine Pycnogenol Alpha Lipoic Acid Green Tea Extract Grape Seed Extract Acetyl-L Carnitine Vitamin C Tocotrienols

Higher serum ratio of L/Z to B-carotene associated with a 2/3 lower risk of any DR





MPOD is lower in diabetes and lower still in DR



L/Z supplementation increased MPOD and improved VA ,contrast and foveal thickness in NPDR patients



Lutein reduces nfKB & increases BDNF Zeaxanthin reduces VEGF and ICAM-1



Int J Ophthalmol 2011;4(3):303-6 Br J Nutr 2009 Jan;101(2):270-7.

Vitamin D

Exp Biol Med 2011 Sep 1;236(9):1051-63. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2008 Apr;49(4):1645-51

Curcumin

 Vitamin D deficiency and insufficiency are associated with diabetes and retinopathy in both T1DM and T2DM  Retinopathy severity is associated with worsening serum vitamin D status in T2DM



DR rates are lowest in India after all adjustments



High dose prevents DR in animals Lowers nfKB, VEGF, TGF-B, AGEs and pancreatic beta-amyloid



 Down-regulates nfKB, TNF-a & inhibits neovascularization independently of VEGF  Inhibits foam cell formation

Lancet 2010;376:124-36 Nutr Metab 2007 Apr 16;4:8.

.Endocr

Pract 2012 Mar-Apr;18(2):185-93

Diabetes Care 2011 Jun;34(6):1400-2

J Immunol

2012 Mar 1;188(5):2127-35

Pycnogenol 



   

Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2008 May;80(2):185-91

Clin Biochem 2000 Feb;33(1):47-51

Benfotiamine

30+ RCTs showing health benefits, including 4 showing lower A1c, oxidized LDL-C & BP Reduced retinal edema & improved blood flow in NPDR J Ocu Pharmacol Ther. 2009;25(6):537-40



Normalized activity in polyol, hexosamine, AGE, pathways in T1DM Diabetologia. 2008 Oct;51(10): 1930-2



Inhibits nfKB, VEGF Inhibits ACE/eNOS to lower BP Inhibits MMP-9 to reduce capillary leakage Lowers post-prandial glucose spikes



Totally prevented diabetic retinopathy in an animal model Normalized 4 major pathways of biochemical insult due to hyperglycemia (polyol, PKC, hexosamine, AGE) Blocks pericyte apoptosis due to hyperglycemia



Nat Med. 2003 Mar;9(3): 294-9 Inflamm. 2006 Jan 27;3:1)

J Ethnopharmacol. 2011

Jan 27;133(2):261-77

Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2009 Oct;25(7):647-56

9

Diabetes Visual Function Supplement Study “It may be time to develop, test and educate ECPs & the public about an AREDS type multi-component supplement for patients with diabetes and diabetic retinopathy” Beyond AREDS: is there a place for antioxidant therapy in the prevention/treatment of eye disease? Kowluru RA, Zhong Q. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011 Nov 7;52(12):8665-71

(DiVFuSS) 

 

6 month placebo-controlled RCCT of adults with T1DM or T2DM > 5 years With and without retinopathy Daily use of a multi-component nutritional supplement (lutein, zeaxanthin, D, C, E, Zn, curcumin, benfotiamine, Pycnogenol, lipoic acid, NAC, resveratrol, grapeseed extract, green tea, O-3 FAs, CoQ10)



CSF, MPOD, color vis., macular perimetry, OCT, A1c, lipids, 25(OH) vit. D, TNF-a, hsCRP, DNS score ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01646047

Animal Model of DR

Supplementation with Test Formula prevented diabetes-induced increase in

• Test formula blocked early mitochondrial damage in rats

VEGF

NF-kB 250

VEGF (pmol/ug)

*

1.5

• Test formula blocked retinal capillary apoptosis underlying DR • Test formula improved b-wave ERG (retinal function) Kowluru RA – Kresge Eye Institute Presented at ARVO 2013, Seattle

#

1.0 0.5 0.0

Nor

Diab

C-AO

NF-kB-p65 (% normal)

2.0

*

200 150 #

100 50 0

Nor

Diab

C-AO

Kowluru RA – Kresge Eye Institute Presented at ARVO 2013, Seattle

dysfunction

capillary cell apoptosis

150 #

100

*

0

Nor

Diab

C-AO

oxidative stress 250

*

15 10 #

5 0

Nor

Diab

C-AO

mtDNA damage

200 150 #

100

So Will This Formula Work in Humans with Diabetes Mellitus?

120

*

13.4kb:210bp

Total ROS (% normal)

20

+

50

TUNEL capillary cells/retina

b wave ampl (25000mcd.s/m^2)

Supplementation with Test Formula prevented diabetes-induced retinal

#

80

*

40

50 0

Nor

Diab

C-AO

0

Nor

Diab

C-AO

10

Subject Characteristics (n = 55)

DiVFuSS Enrollment 

55 total enrolled to date



31-79 yo (mean = 56 yrs)



29 with NPDR 26 with no DR 21 T1DM 34 T2DM HbA1c range 5.8 to 9.3% (mean 7.4%) Mean A1c in those with DR = 7.8% Mean A1c in those with no DR = 7.1%

 





34 have completed the trial



Unmasked data recently analyzed for presentation at 2013 Academy of Optometry meeting





 

Diabetes duration 5-52 years (mean 21.2 yrs) Mean 23.4 years in those with DR Mean 14.7 years in those with no DR

Relative Values of Serum Lab Markers Pre- (solid) and Post- (dashed) Supplemented Group in Black Placebo Group in Red

Unmasked Data (n = 34) 

22 on active supplement (S)

6 T1DM/16 T2DM 10 DR/12 no DR mean duration = 22.6 yrs mean BMI = 30.04



12 on placebo (P)

2 T1DM/10 T2DM 7 DR/ 5 no DR mean duration = 21.8 yrs mean BMI = 32.7 HbA1c

No statistically significant differences at baseline between S and P groups

Color Error Score Right

Left

5-2 MD Right

T Chol

LDL-C

HDL-C

TGs

hsCRP

Mean Contrast For S and P Groups Pre- and Post Trial

Relative Measures of Visual Function and NFL Thickness Pre- (solid) and Post- (dashed) Supplemented Group in Black Placebo Group in Red

MPOD

25-OH D

Left

OCT Right

Left

11

Summary of Early Findings in Human Subjects 

 Though improved metabolic control

has a major impact on incidence of DR, many patients do not achieve this goal

DiVFuSS formula significantly improved visual function, including contrast sensitivity, visual field sensitivity and color perception

 Targeting the pathways that drive

DR with science-based supplements makes biologic sense and requires more investigation

p = 0.002 to 0.05 

DiVFuSS formula significantly reduced hsCRP p = 0.04

Blood Pressure Matters in DR – the UKPDS

The Hemodynamics of Diabetic Retinopathy 

Designed to answer two questions: 1. Does tight glycemic control benefit Type 2 patients? 2. To what extent does blood pressure control influence outcomes?

UKPDS Conclusions

UKPDS Results – Blood Pressure  

Mean BP of Intensive Group = 144/82 Mean BP of Conventional Group = 154/87

Complication

Worsening Retinopathy Severe Reduction in Vision Death Caused by Diabetes Stroke

Reduction in Risk For Intensive vs Conventional 34% 49% 32% 44%





Rigorous blood pressure control is paramount in minimizing adverse macrovascular outcomes Rigorous blood pressure control is at least as important in minimizing DRT as is rigorous blood glucose control

Why?

12

Diabetes Causes Defective Ocular Hemodynamics 



Hyperglycemia impairs retinal vasoconstriction in response to increased blood flow and/or decreased intraocular pressure Proven by research using hyperoxic stimulus to vasoconstriction Microvasc Res. 2007 May;73(3):191-7 Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2009 Oct;50(10):4814-21

Autoregulation is defined as “the ability of a vascular bed to maintain constant blood flow to the tissues under conditions of varying perfusion pressure”. Variable blood pressure Variable IOP

How Does Hyperglycemia Increase Retinal Blood Flow? 



Blood Flow (Q) Q 

= ΔPлr4/8nl

small changes in radius (r) result in large increases in blood flow

ΔP = difference in arterial and venous pressure n = blood viscosity l = vessel length

Importance of BP Control 





Hyperglycemia and Hypertension both contribute to increased Mean Arterial Pressure (MAP), Retinal Perfusion Pressure (RPP), and Blood Flow Diabetes causes defective retinal vascular auto-regulation leading to increased flow for any given RPP MAP and RPP may be highly predictive of Sight-Threatening DRT

Retinal Perfusion Pressure is the Equilibrium Between BP and IOP

Retinal blood flow is under local control; capillary endothelial pericytes regulate vasoconstriction in response to endothelin-1 (ET-1) Chronic hyperglycemia results in overexpression of ET-1 (reduced blood flow) but, ultimately, pericyte death leads to unchecked vasodilation Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 2002 Oct;80(5):468-77

Poiseuille’s Law

IOP BP Blood Pressure Increases Blood Flow Into the Eye

IOP Resists Blood Flow

Retinal blood flow is determined by the microvasculature’s ability to regulate RPP

13

Importance of BP Control 

Vessel Stresses of Increased Blood Flow

Increased RPP & blood flow (volume/unit of time) into the eye causes:

Laminar Flow

– Shear Stress that damages capillary endothelium a retinal capillary closure and hypoxic stress – Shunting of blood flow to larger caliber vessels a decreased retinal capillary perfusion and hypoxic stress

v

FLOW

Circumferential Stress = RPP x Vessel Radius Wall Thickness Endothelial Shear Stress = RPP x Resistivity Index

Increased Blood Flow… 

Reduced oxygenation of capillary bed



Hyperoxygenation of venous blood



Increased risk of severe NPDR and Proliferative DR

Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2009 Aug;247(8):1025-30 Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2013 Oct 29;54(10):7103-6

Retinal Perfusion Pressure 



RPP is calculated from pressure in the CRA as measured by ophthalmodynamometry but may be closely approximated by measurement of blood pressure and IOP

RPP = 2/3(MAP) – IOP MAP = Mean Arterial Pressure MAP = (Systolic BP – Diastolic BP)/3 + Diastolic BP

Retinal Perfusion Pressure 

Retinal perfusion pressure and pulse pressure: clinical parameters predicting progression to sight-threatening diabetic retinopathy British Journal of Diabetes & Vascular Disease Aug 2001;1(1):80-87 International Diabetes Federation, Paris 2003

14

Retinal Perfusion Pressure 



Hemodynamic and biochemical data analyzed from a prospective database of Type 1 and Type 2 patients seen at the University of Warwick (UK) Diabetic Retinopathy Clinic from 19641994 (n= 1384) STR defined as development of CSME or PDR

Study Analysis 

Results: Important Factors for STR 



Type 1 Diabetes (n=457) – RPP p< 0.001 – Duration of Diabetes p=0.008 Type 2 Diabetes (n=927) – Mean Arterial Pressure p< 0.0001 – Diastolic Blood Pressure p< 0.001

Examples – case 1 BP = 120/80 and IOP = 20mm

4-6 x elevation in relative risk for STR when:

MAP = (120-80)/3 + 80 = 93.3mm RPP = 2/3 (93.3) - 20 = 42.2mm

What if IOP = 10mm

RPP

> 50.1 mm (Type 1) MAP > 97.1 mm (Type 2)

MAP = 93.3 mm RPP = 2/3 (93.3) – 10 = 52.2 mm Higher IOP lowers RPP

Examples – case 2 BP = 150/100 and IOP = 20mm MAP = (150-100)/3 + 100 = 116.6 mm RPP = 2/3 (116.6) - 20 = 57.8 mm

Uniqueness of Ocular Hemodynamics 



Case 1 vs Case 2: a 25% rise in BP results in a 30-37% rise in RPP RPP rises faster (non-linearly) than BP

What if IOP = 10mm

MAP = 116.6 mm RPP = 2/3 (116.6) – 10 = 67.8 mm Higher IOP lowers RPP, but less so than does lowering blood pressure



Combined with defective vascular auto-regulation, this makes eyes of people with DM more susceptible to hypertensive insult

15

Relationship Between BP and RPP IOP = 30

100

Hemodynamics of STR

IOP = 20 IOP = 10



80

% Increase In RPP

60

– – – –

40 20

-40

-20

20

40

60

Hyperglycemia Systemic hypertension Pregnancy Ocular hypotension

80

-20 -40

Conditions that increase retinal blood flow increase the risk of severe DRT



% Increase In Blood Pressure

Concordant with UKPDS and WESDR findings but more predictive of STR

-60

Hemodynamics – “take home” 









Diabetic eyes can’t tolerate elevated BP This is particularly true when blood glucose levels are chronically and significantly elevated

Beware unnecessarily treating OHTN in diabetes patients with poor glycemic control, inadequate hypertensive control and/or longstanding disease

Always measure/evaluate BP in patients with DM Consider Calculating MAP and RPP to gauge risk

Strategies For Prevention 

Strategies For Preventing Diabetic Eye Disease



Tight glycemic control & limited glycemic variability to reduce production of ROS Pathway inhibitors if/when proven safe & effective -

Lutein & zeaxanthin Benfotiamine Pycnogenol Curcuminoids Vit D Lipoic Acid

16

Strategies For Prevention 

Tight control of any HTN & dyslipidemia – ACEIs or ARBs – Fenofibrate in T2DM with NPDR







Calculate and improve RPP and MAP Patient/Doctor education and communication Prevention of diabetes!

The DPP  Prevention

of Diabetes

– The Diabetes Prevention Program (DPP) conducted at 13 US centers showed that “lifestyle modification” lowered the risk of type 2 diabetes in those with pre-diabetes by 58%

Walk 30 minutes per day, five times per week

My Challenge to YOU!! 



Don’t Simply Tell Patients They Need “Better Diabetes Control” Treat each patient as you would yourself or your family! – Individualize Your Care Based on Risk Factors and Emerging Science

 DIVERSIFY

YOUR PORTFOLIO!

Prevention of Diabetes The Key Strategy The Diabetes Epidemic

Diabetic Eye Disease Kidney Disease Nerve Disease CV Disease

Understanding the Biochemistry and Hemodynamics of diabetic eye disease helps us to: Critically appraise scientific “breakthroughs” Formulate hypotheses and participate in scientific advancement Gauge risk for individual patients with diabetes Deliver better clinical information and care

Thank You!

Questions? [email protected]

17