Anatomy & Physiology: Current Research
Heymsfield et al., Anat Physiol 2016, 6:5 DOI: 10.4172/2161-0940.1000239
Research Article
Open Access
Adult Human Ocular Volume: Scaling to Body Size and Composition Steven B Heymsfield1*, Cristina Gonzalez M2, Diana Thomas3, Kori Murray1, Guang Jia4, Erik Cattrysse5, Jan Pieter Clarys5,6 and Aldo Scafoglieri5 1Pennington
Biomedical Research Center, Baton Rouge, LA, USA
2Post-Graduation
Program in Health and Behavior, Catholic University of Pelotas, Brazil
3Department
of Mathematical Sciences, Montclair State University, Montclair, NJ, USA
4Department
of Medical Physics, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, USA
5Experimental 6Radiology
Anatomy Research Department, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
Department, University Hospital Brussels, Brussels, Belgium
*Corresponding
author: Steven B Heymsfield, Pennington Biomedical Research Center, 6400 Perkins Rd., Baton Rouge, LA 70808, USA, Tel: 225-763-2541; Fax: 225-763-0935; E-mail:
[email protected]
Received date: August 6, 2016; Accepted date: August 24, 2016; Published date: August 30, 2016 Copyright: © 2016 Heymsfield SB, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Abstract Objectives: Little is currently known on how human ocular volume (OV) relates to body size or composition across adult men and women. This gap was filled in an exploratory study on the path to developing anthropological and physiological models by measuring OV in young healthy adults and related brain, head, and body mass along with major body components. Methods: Thirty-six men and 44 women, ages 20-35 yrs, were evaluated with magnetic resonance imaging and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry that provided estimates of OV, brain, head, fat, lean soft tissue (LST), and bone mineral mass. Associations between OV and other components were evaluated first followed by development of allometric models relating OV and other components to body size as defined by stature. Results: Mean OV was non-significantly larger in men (X ± SD; 6.35 ± 0.69 cm3) than in women (6.26 ± 0.53 cm3; P=NS), although OV in women was significantly larger relative to brain and head mass than in men (both p
