Appendix

8 downloads 0 Views 474KB Size Report
... strongly supports the conclusion that the recipient's HEV infection was TT. ... 10330. AF185822 U40044. 76. X98292. AY23020. 2. AF06. 5061. 99. AF051. 351.
Appendix This appendix was part of the submitted manuscript and has been peer reviewed. It is posted as supplied by the authors.

Appendix to: Hoad VC, Gibbs T, Ravikumara M, et al. First confirmed case of transfusion-transmitted hepatitis E in Australia. Med J Aust 2017; 206: 289-290. doi: 10.5694/mja16.01090.

Online appendix for “First confirmed case of transfusion-transmitted hepatitis E in Australia” Molecular characterisation of hepatitis E virus Hepatitis E virus (HEV) RNA was detected in our patient’s liver biopsy and whole blood from March 2015 using an in-house RT-PCR assay. On retrospective testing using the same assay, HEV RNA was detected in post-transplant plasma from September 2014 but was not detected in pre-transplant serum from July 2014. The HEV RNA detection was confirmed at a national reference centre using a commercial HEV assay (RealStar HEV RT-PCR, Altona Diagnostics, Germany). Nucleotide sequencing of the HEV open reading frame 2 (ORF2) region identified it as HEV genotype 3. Patient liver samples and donor liver samples set aside at the time of transplant were retrieved and tested using the in-house and commercial assays and HEV RNA was not detected. The Australian Red Cross Blood Service (Blood Service) keeps a repository sample of every donation collected for three years following donation. The archived samples from the units transfused to the patient peri-transplant were retrieved and tested for HEV RNA at the same national reference centre using the commercial assay. HEV RNA was detected in one blood donation and was found by sequence analysis to be HEV genotype 3. This donation was a whole blood donation that was manufactured into red cell, platelet, and fresh frozen plasma (FFP) components. Our patient had received the FFP component of the implicated donation, while the red cell component had been transfused into another recipient who died of an unrelated cause and the platelet component was discarded. The viral load of the HEV positive donation was quantified using a “research use only” RT-PCR with 10-fold serial dilutions of a WHO International Standard for HEV (Paul-EhrlichInstitut, Germany). The viral load was estimated to be 947 IU/mL. Sequencing of the ORF2 region of the HEV genome in the blood donation demonstrated 100% homology with the patient HEV where the sequences overlapped (145 base pairs). The donor and patient sequences were compared with other HEV sequences in GenBank® and matched best with European human- and swine-origin strains. The sequences were also compared to HEV sequences from a contemporaneous foodborne outbreak of HEV in NSW1and were found to have at most a 90% homology in the ORF2 region overlap (167/186 base pairs). Phylogenetic analysis resolved our sequences and published reference sequences into previously described monophyletic groups2 despite the small region sequenced (Figure 1). The donor and patient sequences clustered together within the 3chi group of the HEV-3 clade, whereas the foodborne outbreak sequence from NSW was assigned to the 3jab group. The cause of our patient’s original hepatitis necessitating transplant remains unknown, but is unlikely to be HEV-related as HEV RNA was not detected in blood collected during the acute hepatitis or in patient liver samples set aside at the time of transplant. The detection of HEV RNA in blood collected soon after transplant suggested acquisition peri-transplant, but transmission from the donor liver was excluded. Incidental foodborne acquisition related to a HEV outbreak that occurred in NSW around the time of the transplant1 is unlikely, as the patient HEV sequence did not show high homology with outbreak strains and clustered within a different monophyletic group on phylogenetic analysis. The Blood Service investigation found HEV RNA in a blood product the patient received peri-transplant at viral loads above the minimum infectious dose associated with transfusion-transmission (TT).3 The HEV RNA detected in the blood product sample showed 100% homology with the patient’s strain and clinical history suggests the blood product donor acquired HEV infection in France prior to donation. This evidence strongly supports the conclusion that the recipient’s HEV infection was TT.

84 55 7

95

EU360977

82

HEV-4

75 66 69 536 JQ9 90 JN9670 8 94 2 6 7 6 83 JQ52 C31 9 JKN 60 57 536369687 J6AB 83 F GU947815 EU3754 63 AB E EU 29 U7 495148 19 235 KF 61 16 891 380 80

4 51 23 513 U7723 EU 723515 EU

AB AB 291 2 09 AB22209 9759 77 AB220976 72 17 09 7 AB222097489 2 0 AB AB

3feg

EU 72 35 12 G U1 17 63 6 88 FJ95 67 57 JJNN9 90069 69 76 74

56

67

91 66

19 80 99 FJ 8 7 59 55 3 9805 922 F HM K

AF 4

54

L25595 L08816 47 L255 3 10992 D1110 581 D 80 M

57

57

63

A ABB 22 AB216109 2097173 775

3chi

98

AF 08 28 4 80

00

68

794 JQ013 JN3 9837 2

6 JQ 801 95 36 64

1954 AB2926 436 AB4 AB44362 AB A BA244 9 366243 AABBB21299 9 0 444431199557 3662 1 275

14

565 199552 22299991119953 AABBB 2

54 52 8 AB 8-N KF073SW 30 912-O 35 ut b 0 rea DQ 2 k 07 D 96 Q0 25 796 27

77 62 1 DQ AB6 AB189070 AB A B 189807 74 07 BD1118889990 Q9 00773 96 30 A0077925 B262 226 18 2

3 73 29 9120 63 96 9 B653 0 7 ABA21322B92961 48 A667 DQ 83 21 AB B 24 4 22 88 0A91139 9 AB AB 696 1710 3430 AB3AB30 AP00 84 AB2221

88

03 5

59

57

3

9 78

7 66 2 7 50

KF 3

68 06 28 06 812 3 AAF B4 40 26 04 J4 64 F 42 F J 0063 4 1 568495 JHNQ3 37408795506066 9 JN8KJ5 AF AB591734 AB074920 AB AB6309 A B 0307 18 70 869049 832448

A AB B09 08 78 05 12 75

1

X982 92

U400442 582 76 AF18

8 7 5 D10330 41 321 57 X994 M7 9342 45 8 3 DQ594 35 4 00 AF 72 AB

6 450 M7

964 AB29125 3420 AB

AJ272108 KC163335

77 31 19 AB

AB AB 19 1 331 AB09913 17786 6 95 273 AB099347 71 81217 53 76 AB22909 0 8712 B A 4 B 96676 A 29119 AB 29 AB

FJ610232 4199 AY59

36 23 4 G U1 AB 88 69 85 86 AB 1 36 DQ 54 96 27 8 66 8 90 AB1 91 085 AB2 2 3 7 0 EU6761 974 72

AB074915

DQ450072 90 58 AB3696570133 4 EF 30 767 EF0776AB 19 3 5 67 74 59 97 3 69 1 72 36 AB AY EU

KF 7

AF A 07 F 0 62 51 39 83 AB 0 72 00 34 FJ 4596 70 24

HEV-2

99

HEV-1

50 04 51 78804452 B7780 ABB A AB780453 8520 AB24 AB 2919 7521 58 95 52 AB2485 JQ953665 AB4 21 JQ0264 AB8122 07 24 6 98952 2 FJ JJQ AB 99 N301 29 80 98379 03 15 37 5 13 1

A A F 05 Y2 1 3 04 AF A 5 8 AY 20650 F025 77 3020 612 135

a)

3jab

KF303501 EF 4912 06 AB 2903 FJ998 12 008 UK526FJ70 11KE R 5359 5555022C664 73 6277761184 4 5972 9 02 9- 4-R D GU KJ7 onecip o 01 r ien 55 40 69 9 t 29

AB 63 09

FJ9068

95

rabbit 92

GU93

7805 FJ90

6896

71

65

1962 AB29 KJ507956 HM439285 FJ5278 32

HEV-3

AB 7 D Q 4 0 0 796232 32 AB 36 9 68 9

0 .0 5

EU526644.3c.Netherlands.pig.2005

Figure 1: Molecular Phylogenetic Analysis

50

b) Molecular phylogenetic analysis was performed as described previously (2) with the percentage of trees (from 500 bootstrap replicates) in which the associated taxa clustered together is shown next to the branches when over 50%.

FJ705359.3c.Germany.w ild boar.2006 KC618402.3c.Germany.human.2011

84

155277724-Recipient.3.Australia.human.2015 15562599-Donor.3.Australia.human.2015 KR027619.3.France.human KF303501.3c.Germany.w ild boar.2008

a) Global view of the unrooted tree using 193 reference sequences cited by (2) covering 117 codons. Donor and recipient sequences (overlapping) are shown with red circle and unrelated NSW foodborne outbreak sequence with blue square.

EF491206.3l.Brazil.pig.2003 JQ013794.3h.France.human.2007 99

JN398372.3h.France.human.2009

FJ998008.3i.Germany.w ild boar AB290312.3h.Mongolia.pig.2006

b) Focused view of donor and recipient sequences (red circles) with the most closely related sequence by BLAST search immediately below and the 12 most closely related reference sequences. Genotype, country of origin, host and year are shown, where available.

KJ701409.3c.France.human.2009 JQ953664.3h.France.pig.2006 63

GU556929.3c.Italy.pig

0 .0 2

References 1. Yapa CM, Furlong C, Rosewell A, et al. First reported outbreak of locally acquired hepatitis E virus infection in Australia. Med J Aust 2016; 204: 274-274.e6. 2. Vina-Rodriguez A, Schlosser J, Becher et al. Hepatitis E virus genotype 3 diversity: phylogenetic analysis and presence of subtype 3b in wild boar in Europe. Mehle A, ed. Viruses. 2015;7(5):2704-2726. 3. Hewitt PE, Ijaz S, Brailsford SR et al. Hepatitis E virus in blood components: a prevalence and transmission study in southeast England. Lancet 2014; 384: 1766-1773.