Arsenic adsorption onto aluminium-substituted goethite

2 downloads 0 Views 624KB Size Report
Table S1. Agreement factors for the Rietveld refinements. Rp = 100Σ|Io – Ic|/ΣIo; wRp = 100[Σwi(Io – Ic)2/Σ(wiIo)2]0.5; RBragg = 100Σ|Iko – Ikc|/ΣIko; χ2 =.
Environ. Chem. 2016 doi:10.1071/EN15154_AC

©CSIRO 2016

Supplementary material

Arsenic adsorption onto aluminium-substituted goethite Ana E. Tufo,A María dos Santos AfonsoB and Elsa E. SileoB,C A

Laboratorio de Química Ambiental, 3iA–ECyT, Universidad de San Martín,

Martín de Irigoyen 3100, CP1650, Buenos Aires, Argentina. B

Instituto de Química Física de los Materiales, Medio Ambiente y Energía,

Departamento de Química Inorgánica, Analítica y Química Física, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Pabellón II, Ciudad Universitaria, C1428EHA, Buenos Aires, Argentina. C

Corresponding author. Email: [email protected]

Page 1 of 6

Environ. Chem. 2016 doi:10.1071/EN15154_AC

©CSIRO 2016

1689.7

3428.8

Intensity (a.u.)

3416.3

1257.2

3150.8 794.4

3416.3

3150.8 793.6

3411.9 Surface OH

3500

899.8

3141.8  stretch

3000

2500

793.3

2000

1500

1000

893.9

891.3

500

cm–1

Fig. S1.

Attenuated total reflection Fourier-transform infrared (ATR-FTIR) interferograms of: GAl0 (blue

line); GAl3.78 (red dashed line); GAl7.61 (green dashed line); and ammonium oxalate (black dashed line).

Page 2 of 6

Environ. Chem. 2016 doi:10.1071/EN15154_AC

©CSIRO 2016

1.00 0.98

mass (mg)

0.96 0.94 0.92 0.90 0.88 0

100

200

300

400

500

Temperature (°C) Fig. S2. Thermogravimetric analysis of the samples: GAl0 (blue line); GAl3.78 (red dashed line); and GAl7.61 (green dashed line).

Table S1. Agreement factors for the Rietveld refinements Rp = 100Σ|Io – Ic|/ΣIo; wRp = 100[Σwi(Io – Ic)2/Σ(wiIo)2]0.5; RBragg = 100Σ|Iko – Ikc|/ΣIko; χ2 = Σwi(Io – Ic)2/(N – P). Io and Ic, observed and calculated intensities; wi, weight assigned to each step intensity; Iko and Ikc, observed and calculated intensities for Bragg k-reflection; N and P, number of data points in the pattern and number of parameters refined Sample χ2 wRp Rp RBragg

GAl0 1.51 8.38 6.88 3.11

GAl3.78 1.40 9.40 7.63 4.19

Page 3 of 6

GAl7.61 1.46 7.42 6.04 2.95

Environ. Chem. 2016 doi:10.1071/EN15154_AC

Fig. S3.

©CSIRO 2016

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

Scanning electron micrographs of the samples, magnification 400 000× for: (a) GAl0, average size

903 × 110 nm; (b) GAl3.78, average size 515 × 88 nm; (c) GAl7.61, average size 484 × 80 nm. Micrograph at 600 000× for (d) GAl3.78.

Page 4 of 6

©CSIRO 2016

Intensity (a.u.)

Environ. Chem. 2016 doi:10.1071/EN15154_AC

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

2  (°) Fig. S4.

X-ray diffraction patterns: GAl0 (blue line); GAl3.78 (red dashed line); GAl7.61 (green dashed line).

Fig. S5.

Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS) analysis of diaspore.

Page 5 of 6

Environ. Chem. 2016 doi:10.1071/EN15154_AC

©CSIRO 2016

5000

Intensity (a. u.)

4000

3000

2000

1000

0 10

20

30

40

50

2 

Fig. S6.

X-ray diffraction pattern of natural diaspore.

Page 6 of 6

60

70