GENERAL COMMENTARY published: 01 December 2014 doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01381
Attentional cueing in numerical cognition Martin H. Fischer 1* and André Knops 2 1
Division of Cognitive Science, University of Potsdam, Potsdam - Golm, Germany Emmy Noether Research Group Leader, Department of Psychology, Humboldt-University Berlin, Berlin, Germany *Correspondence:
[email protected] 2
Edited by: Roberta Sellaro, Leiden University, Netherlands Reviewed by: Mario Bonato, Ghent University, Belgium Barbara Treccani, University of Sassari, Italy Keywords: attention, number line, SNARC effect, visual perception, response selection
A commentary on Number-induced shifts in spatial attention: a replication study by Zanolie, K., and Pecher, D. (2014). Front. Psychol. 5:987. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00987 Fischer et al. (2003) discovered that noninformative central numerical cues induce attention shifts: In accordance with a spatially organized mental number line, small, and large numbers facilitated detection of targets in the left and right visual hemifields, respectively. Zanolie and Pecher (2014, henceforth Z&P) failed to observe this pattern in 5 of 6 replication attempts and concluded that “the mental number line is not activated automatically but at best only when it is contextually relevant.” We briefly describe the current understanding of spatial-numerical associations (SNAs) before identifying aspects of Z&P’s study that might explain their failure to replicate the attentional cueing effect of numbers. In addition to two successful replications acknowledged by Z&P (and a replication within the original paper), number-induced attentional biases were also found by several other labs (for references, see Fischer and Shaki, 2014, p. 1465). The effect has been extended to neuroscientific measures, such as modulations of neural activity in occipital cortex as measured with functional magnetic resonance imaging (Goffaux et al., 2014), or increased P1 and P3 amplitudes in EEG (Sallilas et al., 2008), and it is also reflected in attention-related ERP-components
www.frontiersin.org
EDAN and ADAN (Ranzini et al., 2009) Recent evidence suggests that these ERPcorrelates of number-induced attentional cueing are not restricted to mere detection tasks but generalize to color discrimination (Schuller et al., 2014). Moreover, number-induced attention shifts in EEG signatures even without behavioral bias, as in the Ranzini et al. (2009) study, can be interpreted as strong replications and not a problem. Attentional effects of SNAs have been documented in children (e.g., van Galen and Reitsma, 2008), adults (Dodd, 2011), and synesthetes (Jarick et al., 2009). Finally, SNA-driven attentional biases have recently been generalized into mental arithmetic (Masson and Pesenti, 2014). The hypothesis that number magnitude biases spatial attention is attractive because this converges with neuroscience facts to explain behavior. For example, healthy adults bisect digit strings made of small, or large numbers to the left or right of center, respectively (Fischer, 2001; Calabria and Rossetti, 2005). Bisection tasks are, in turn, a standard assessment procedure for parietal lobe function (Bonato et al., 2008). Areas in posterior superior parietal cortex (PSPC) are involved in shifting spatial attention and planning saccade targets. PSPC is densely interconnected with the more anteriorly located horizontal aspect of the intraparietal sulcus (hIPS) which processes numerical magnitudes (Nieder and Dehaene, 2009; Eger et al., 2014). Basic mathematical operations may be neurally implemented via functional interactions between hIPS and PSPC and their connection to left perisylvian language areas as well as frontal
cortex (Hubbard et al., 2005). Knops et al. (2009) applied machine learning algorithms to the BOLD-activity of PSPC to classify left from right saccades. Crucially, without further training this classifier successfully distinguished mental addition and subtraction, equating addition and subtraction with rightward and leftward saccades, respectively. These results all substantiate the functional role of attention shifts in numerical cognition due to SNAs. Given these replications, extensions, and conceptual convergence, why did Z&P fail to replicate the original effect? Leaving aside the misleading visualization of their method (see corrigendum, doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01206), one methodological problem resides with Z&P’s decision to obtain evidence for number processing from manual key presses. Participants pressed buttons to indicate digit parity (in Experiments 2 and 5) or magnitude (in Experiments 3 and 6); such responses were not required in the original study. Response preparation was then possible as soon as digits were identified, thus inducing systematic attention shifts for left and right responses that could be either congruent or incongruent with the magnituderelated bias (e.g., Eimer et al., 2005). Although reporting digits after a trial can improve the chance of finding SNAs (e.g., Casarotti et al., 2007), averaging across the manual response conditions dilutes effects of digit presentation on attention allocation. This concern pertains, however, only to 4 of the 6 experiments. Thus, there must be other reasons for
December 2014 | Volume 5 | Article 1381 | 1
Fischer and Knops
why Z&P failed to replicate the original results. Relatively large samples, as tested by Z&P, do indeed increase statistical sensitivity but also heterogeneity with respect to SNAs: Strength and automaticity of SNAs covary with age and learning history (cf. Wood et al., 2008; Fischer and Shaki, 2014). For example, finger counting is more left-associated in Canada compared to Holland (where the original and replication studies were conducted; Lindemann and Tira, 2011), and this in turn supports SNAs (Fischer, 2008). Similarly, directional reading habits modulate SNAs (Shaki et al., 2009; Shaki and Fischer, 2014). Although not reported in the original study or by Z&P, finger counting preferences and reading habits of participants should be assessed in future studies in light of these recent insights. Recent evidence and computational theories of selective attention suggest that the salience of a given object in the visual scene relies on the combination of both bottom-up, physical stimulus properties (e.g., luminance or contrast) and its current top-down, strategic relevance for the observer’s goals (Fecteau and Munoz, 2006). Hence, context determines the extent of attentional cueing effects, and may likewise determine SNAs. By integrating stimulus-driven conspicuity and strategic relevance the recently proposed idea of priority maps may provide an attractive and coherent framework to investigate the scope and limits of attentional cueing in numerical cognition (Knops et al., 2014). In a similar vein, more evidence is required to elucidate to what extent other well-established attentional mechanisms, such as orienting (benefit due to valid cueing) vs. re-orienting (costs of invalid cueing), differentially contribute to SNAs. For example, in 7– 8-year-old children the numerical overand underestimation during approximate calculation correlates with the costs of invalid attentional cueing (re-orienting) but not with the benefit of valid cueing (orienting) in a Posner paradigm (Knops et al., 2013). The question whether space is fundamental to number meaning or context-dependent is widely debated (for review see Fischer and Shaki, 2014). We conclude that attentional cueing through
Frontiers in Psychology | Cognition
Attentional cueing in numerical cognition
number magnitude is indeed subtle and context-dependent but remains a valuable additional tool for investigating conceptual knowledge.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Martin H. Fischer is sponsored by DFG grant 1915/3-1 Action-driven Attention. André Knops is sponsored by DFG grant KN 959/2-1.
REFERENCES Bonato, M., Priftis, K., Marenzi, R., and Zorzi, M. (2008). Modulation of hemispatial neglect by directional and numerical cues in the line bisection task. Neuropsychologia 46, 426–433. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2007.08.019 Calabria, M., and Rossetti, Y. (2005). Interference between number processing and line bisection: a methodology. Neuropsychologia 43, 779–783. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2004. 06.027 Casarotti, M., Michielin, M., Zorzi, M., and Umiltà, C. (2007). Temporal order Judgment reveals how number magnitude affects visuospatial attention. Cognition 102, 101–117. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2006.09.001 Dodd, M. D. (2011). Negative numbers eliminate, but do not reverse, the attentional SNARC effect. Psychol. Res. 75, 2–9. doi: 10.1007/s00426-0100283-6 Eger, E., Pinel, P., Dehaene, S., and Kleinschmidt, A. (2014). Spatially invariant coding of numerical information in functionally defined subregions of human parietal cortex. Cerebral Cortex. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bht323. [Epub ahead of print]. Eimer, M., Forster, B., Van Velzen, J., and Prabhu, G. (2005). Covert manual response preparation triggers attentional shifts: ERP evidence for the premotor theory of attention. Neuropsychologia 43, 957–966. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2004. 08.011 Fecteau, J. H., and Munoz, D. P. (2006). Salience, relevance, and firing: a priority map for target selection. Trends Cogn. Sci. 10, 382–390. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2006.06.011 Fischer, M. H. (2001). Number processing induces spatial performance biases. Neurology 57, 822–826. doi: 10.1212/WNL.57.5.822 Fischer, M. H. (2008). Finger counting habits modulate spatial-numerical associations. Cortex 44, 386–392. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2007.08.004 Fischer, M. H., Castel, A. D., Dodd, M. D., and Pratt, J. (2003). Perceiving numbers causes spatial shifts of attention. Nat. Neurosci. 6, 555–556. doi: 10.1038/nn1066 Fischer, M. H., and Shaki, S. (2014). Spatial Associations in Numerical Cognition: from single digits to arithmetic. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. 67, 1461–1483. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2014. 927515 Goffaux, V., Martin, R., Dormal, G., Goebel, R., and Schiltz, C. (2014). Attentional shifts induced by uninformative number symbols modulate neural activity in human occipital cortex. Neuropsychologia 50,
3419–3428. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012. 09.046 Hubbard, E. M., Piazza, M., Pinel, P., and Dehaene, S. (2005). Interactions between number and space in parietal cortex. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 6, 435–448. doi: 10.1038/nrn1684 Jarick, M., Dixon, M. J., Maxwell, E. C., Nicholls, M. E., and Smilek, D. (2009). The ups and downs (and lefts and rights) of synaesthetic number forms: validation from spatial cueing and SNARC-type tasks. Cortex 45, 1190–1199. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2009.04.015 Knops, A., Piazza, M., Sengupta, R., Eger, E., and Melcher, D. (2014). A shared, flexible neural map architecture reflects capacity limits in both visual short term memory and enumeration. J. Neurosci. 34, 9857–9866. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.275813.2014 Knops, A., Thirion, B., Hubbard, E. M., Michel, V., and Dehaene, S. (2009). Recruitment of an area involved in eye movements during mental arithmetic. Science 324, 1583–1585. doi: 10.1126/science.1171599 Knops, A., Zitzmann, S., and McCrink, K. (2013). Examining the presence and determinants of operational momentum in childhood. Front. Psychol. 4:325. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00325 Lindemann, O., and Tira, M. D. (2011). Operational momentum in numerosity production judgments of multi-digit number problems. J. Psychol. 219, 50–57. doi: 10.1027/2151-2604/ a000046 Masson, N., and Pesenti, M. (2014). Attentional bias induced by solving simple and complex addition and subtraction problems. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. 67, 1514–1526. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2014. 903985 Nieder, A., and Dehaene, S. (2009). Representation of number in the brain. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 32, 185—208. doi: 10.1146/annurev.neuro.051508.135550 Ranzini, M., Dehaene, S., Piazza, M., and Hubbard, E. M. (2009). Neural mechanisms of attentional shifts due to irrelevant spatial and numerical cues. Neuropsychologia 47, 2615–2624. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009. 05.011 Sallilas, E., El Yagoubi, R., and Semenza, C. (2008). Sensory and cognitive processes of shifts of spatial attention induced by numbers: an ERP study. Cortex 44, 406–413. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2007.08.006 Schuller, A.-M., Hoffmann, D., Goffaux, V., and Schiltz, C. (2014). Shifts of spatial attention cued by irrelevant numbers: electrophysiological evidence from a target discrimination task. J. Cogn. Psychol. doi: 10.1080/20445911.2014. 946419 Shaki, S., and Fischer, M. H. (2014). Removing spatial responses reveals spatial concepts–even in a culture with mixed reading habits. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 8:966. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2014. 00966 Shaki, S., Fischer, M. H., and Petrusic, W. M. (2009). Reading habits for both words and numbers contribute to the SNARC effect. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 16, 328–331. doi: 10.3758/PBR.16.2.328 van Galen, M., and Reitsma, P. (2008). Developing access to number magnitude: a study of
December 2014 | Volume 5 | Article 1381 | 2
Fischer and Knops
the SNARC effect in 7- to 9-year-olds. J. Exp. Child Psychol. 101, 99–113. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2008.05.001 Wood, G., Nuerk, H.-C., Willmes, K., and Fischer, M. H. (2008). On the cognitive link between space and number: a meta-analysis of the SNARC effect. Psychol. Sci. Q. 50, 489–525. Zanolie, K., and Pecher, D. (2014). Number-induced shifts in spatial attention: a replication study. Front. Psychol. 5:987. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014. 00987
www.frontiersin.org
Attentional cueing in numerical cognition
Conflict of Interest Statement: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest. Received: 13 October 2014; paper pending published: 30 October 2014; accepted: 11 November 2014; published online: 01 December 2014. Citation: Fischer MH and Knops A (2014) Attentional cueing in numerical cognition. Front. Psychol. 5:1381. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01381
This article was submitted to Cognition, a section of the journal Frontiers in Psychology. Copyright © 2014 Fischer and Knops. This is an openaccess article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
December 2014 | Volume 5 | Article 1381 | 3
