audiology

71 downloads 1338656 Views 8MB Size Report
Over 1,300 diary listings online. • Society ...... sonographer may get surprisingly good views of the ...... children require a degree of sign language to augment ...
ENT audiology news

www.entandaudiologynews.com

IAPO

Exclusive Content 18-20 November 2011 Sao Paulo, Brazil

Included inside: articles from the recent paediatric issue (July/August 2011) Plus added bonus paediatric articles published since 2009

welcome

to your IAPO 2011 Exclusive ENT & audiology news content

featuring articles from the recent paediatric issue (July/August 2011) PLUS added bonus paediatric articles published since 2009

Paediatric articles published in the JULY/AUGUST 2011 issue ENT FOCUS 5

The Scope of Paediatric ENT

19

Iain Bruce

8

Paediatric ENT: why choose this subspecialty?

Congenital Midline Nasal Masses Compared Mary-Louise Montague

22

Sujata De

Virus Infection of the Paediatric Airway and Chronic Disease Effects Adam J Donne and Michael P Rothera

10

Combining Adult and Paediatric Practice – is it still feasible?

25

Konstance Tzifa and Kate Hanvey

Fiona B MacGregor

12

Failed Extubation in Children: assessment and management options

27

Paediatric Nasal Emergencies

31

Tom Beech and Ann-Louise McDermott

17

Neck Abscesses in Children

Serious Complications of Acute Otitis Media: mastoiditis and intracranial sepsis William PL Hellier

Joe Grainger and Michael Kuo

15

The Rehabilitation of the Deaf Child

Reassembling the Auditory World in Children with Cochlear Implants Blake C Papsin, Sharon L Cushing and Karen A Gordon

34

The Future of Paediatric ENT Surgery Gavin Morrison

Louise Melia and Haytham Kubba

AUDIOLOGY MATTERS 38

Paediatric Audiology

45

Josephine Marriage

39

Post Newborn Hearing Screening ABR: quality assurance and the role of peer review

Priya Singh

48

Guy Lightfoot, Graham Sutton and Sally Wood

41

Helping Families Accept Technology Jane R Madell

43

Unilateral Hearing Loss in Early Childhood: what are we doing about it? Amplification Options for Mild Bilateral Hearing Loss & Unilateral Hearing Loss in Children: a literature overview Cherilee Rutherford

Auditory Verbal Therapy Provision in the UK

52

Paediatric Tool Development: developing a rationale for empowering children with hearing loss

Elizabeth Tyszkiewicz

Melanie Gregory

BONUS ARCHIVE: Paediatric articles published since 2009

ENT FOCUS

AUDIOLOGY MATTERS

55

69

European Society of Paediatric Otolaryngology John Graham May/June 2009

57

Doris-Eva Bamiou and Tony Sirimanna Jan/Feb 2009

Paediatric Audiology at Alder Hey Children's NHS Foundation Trust

72

Ezeddin El Tabal Sept/Oct 2009

58

Imaging the Paediatric Airway 75

The Challenges Ahead in Paediatric Audiology Jane Madell Mar/Apr 2009

Bone Anchored Hearing Aids in Children 78

Patrick Sheehan Mar/Apr 2010

65

Managing Children with Auditory Processing Disorders in the Educational Environment Pauline Grant Jan/Feb 2009

Laura Coleman, Helen Williams, Kate Parkes and Michael Kuo Jan/Feb 2010

62

A Clinical Service For Children and Adults With Suspected APD

New Developments in Hearing Aids for Children and Adults Josephine Marriage May/June 2009

Epidemiology of Paediatric Sleep Disordered Breathing 80

Michelle Wyatt Jul/Aug 2010

Cochlear Implantation in Early Childhood: what is happening in the long-term? Sue Archbold Jul/Aug 2009

83

New Frontiers: auditory brainstem results in adults and children Martin O’Driscoll Jul/Aug 2009

87

An Approach to the Dysmorphic Child with Deafness Melissa Lees Sept/Oct 2010

PLUS

Copyright: No part of this journal may be reproduced without written permission from the Publishers. The comments of the reviewers are their own and are not necessarily endorsed by the Publisher, Editor or Editorial Board. Accordingly, the Publisher, Editor or Editorial Board accept no liability for the consequences of any such inaccurate or misleading data, opinion or statement. The Editor’s decision is final and no correspondence will be entered into. The utmost care has been taken to ensure accuracy of detail, but the publishers cannot accept responsibility for errors or omissions. Note: The work of the Editorial Board is wholly honorary and without any direct or indirect commercial or financial interest.

pinpoint scotland ltd

Rosaleen Shine Tel: +353 (0)91 635 890 (Ireland) Email: rosaleen@ pinpoint-scotland.com

90

Special Focus on Distribution

93

International Circulation

SALES EXECUTIVE

Helen Stuart Email: helen@ pinpoint-scotland.com

EDITORIAL AND JOURNAL REVIEW CO-ORDINATOR

Joe Crossland Email: editorial@ pinpoint-scotland.com

OR CONTACT US ON: Tel: +44 (0)131 478 8401 (ENT & audiology news direct line) Tel: +44 (0)131 557 4184 (switchboard) Fax: +44 (0)131 557 4701

features

Paediatric ENT The Scope of Paediatric ENT Paediatric ENT: why choose this subspecialty? Combining Adult and Paediatric Practice – is it still feasible? Failed Extubation in Children: assessment and management options Paediatric Nasal Emergencies Neck Abscesses in Children Congenital Midline Nasal Masses Compared Virus Infection of the Paediatric Airway and Chronic Disease Effects The Rehabilitation of the Deaf Child Serious Complications of Acute Otitis Media: mastoiditis and intracranial sepsis Reassembling the Auditory World in Children with Cochlear Implants The Future of Paediatric ENT Surgery

The Scope of Paediatric ENT Mr Iain Bruce, MD, FRCS(ORL-HNS), Consultant Paediatric Otolaryngologist. Correspondence Royal Manchester Children’s Hospital, Manchester, UK. E: [email protected] Declaration of Competing Interests None declared.

T

he range of services provided by paediatric ENT surgeons continues to evolve with the requirement to manage isolated pathologies and the ENT manifestations of other disease processes (for example nasal polyposis in cystic fibrosis) and syndromes (for example OSA in Mucopolysaccharidosis). The majority of secondary level ENT problems in childhood continue to be managed successfully in District General Hospitals, under the guidance of lead clinicians for paediatric ENT. This article will focus on tertiary level services provided by dedicated paediatric ENT surgeons, often but necessarily exclusively, working in children’s hospitals or large teaching hospitals. An effective working relationship between tertiary and secondary level paediatric ENT services is obviously important if the highest possible standard of care is to be provided. Paediatric ENT as a subspeciality is unique as it necessitates the management of complex otology, rhinology and head and neck problems, with a consultant often being skilled in each of these areas (Table 1). Therefore, there is often an overlap with the skill set of adult subspecialists, with this providing a potential source of strength as it facilitates the recruitment of the most appropriate local team to ensure effective management of certain pathologies. The amount of input from adult subspecialists will vary between hospitals, but an effective relationship is important. This interaction is most noticeable when presented with a child with a head and neck malignancy. Although the child may initially be reviewed by a paediatric ENT surgeon or paediatric oncologist, thyroid or salivary gland malignancy will often be best managed by a cancer surgeon. Children will also be referred with secondary level ENT problems complicated by significant comorbidity.

The management of childhood airway obstruction is a significant component of a paediatric ENT surgeon’s workload. The ability to perform a diagnostic rigid airway endoscopy (MLB, DLTB) is a basic requirement of a paediatric ENT surgeon. A wide variety of airway pathologies may be encountered as illustrated in Figure 1. Management may include endoscopic surgical treatment (for example subglottic cysts), a surgical airway (tracheostomy) or an open airway augmentation procedure (for example laryngotracheal reconstruction with a costal cartilage graft). Access to the airway may be further complicated by abnormalities such as micrognathia in Treacher Collins syndrome. The management of an airway emergency requires advanced airway skills and close cooperation with the paediatric anaesthetist. The management of childhood chronic otitis media, with or without cholesteastoma, is particularly challenging. Effective management of this clinical problem involves disease control or eradication, but an increasing emphasis is also being placed on the rehabilitation of hearing loss once the disease has been treated, to limit the effect on educational performance. Collaboration with paediatric audiologists is important and bone anchored hearing aids (BAHA) and middle ear implants (MEI) may also be indicated. Particular childhood pathologies present specific otological problems, such as hearing loss in children with cleft palate, craniosynostoses, microtia and canal atresia. Although the majority of cochlear implants in children are performed by subspecialist otologists, paediatric ENT surgeons now perform cochlear implantation in several centres in the UK. An established paediatric ENT / anaesthesia team may be more appropriate when the child also has complex comorbidity, particularly involving the airway. Paediatric ENT surgeons will manage congenital head and neck anomalies

An effective working relationship between tertiary and secondary level paediatric ENT services is obviously important if the highest possible standard of care is to be provided ENT & audiology news | www.entandaudiologynews.com

5

feature Figure 1: Laryngeal pathology in children.

Subglottic haemangioma

Epiglottitis

Laryngeal cleft

MPS deposits

Post-intubation changes

Foreign body

Supraglottic cyst

Laryngomalacia

Subglottic stenosis

RRP

Subglottic cyst

Collaborative working with paediatricians, neurologists, intensivists, anaesthetists, audiologists, respiratory physicians and cardiologists is an essential and rewarding aspect of working as a paediatric ENT surgeon

6

ENT & audiology news | www.entandaudiologynews.com

feature Table 1. Summary of childhood tertiary level ENT problems.

including lymphovascular malformations (for example cystic hygroma), branchial abnormalities (for example branchial sinuses), thyroglossal cysts and teratomas. Treatment will often comprise surgical resection but may also include airway management in large cystic hygromas and teratomas. Various congenital abnormalities may present with nasal obstruction or a mass in early childhood. Neonates are obligate nasal breathers and airway obstruction in this period may present as an airway emergency. Pathologies may include choanal atresia, nasal dermoids, gliomas, teratomas and encephaloceles. The surgical approach will be dictated by the nature, site and extent of the disease and the options include endoscopic transnasal, transpalatal, and combined transnasal and transcranal in conjunction with a neurosugeon. A paediatric ENT surgeon must be able to manage the complications of childhood head and neck sepsis. This will include deep neck space infections, orbital complications of rhinosinusitis and the intracranial and intratemporal complications of acute and chronic otitis media. A paediatric ENT surgeon must have demonstrable skills in this area that constitutes, along with airway obstruction, a significant component of on-call commitment. As paediatric ENT departments expand the services provided to children are becoming increasingly comprehensive. To meet these varying clinical demands paediatric ENT surgeons are often required to have undertaken a paediatric ENT fellowship during their training. Collaborative working with paediatricians, neurologists, intensivists, anaesthetists, audiologists, respiratory physicians and cardiologists is an essential and rewarding aspect of working as a paediatric ENT surgeon. !

Anatomical sites

Pathologies

Neck

Deep neck space infections Congenital abnormalities Thyroglossal cysts Branchial abnormalities Lymphovascular abnormalities Teratoma Malignancies Rhabdomyosarcomas Thyroid Salivary gland

Airway

Oropharygeal OSA Micrognathia Adenotonsillar hypertrophy (for example MPS, Down syndrome) Macroglossia (Beckwith Weidermann syndrome) Lingual thyroid Supraglottic Laryngomalacia Vallecular cysts Cystic hygroma (microcystic) RRP Glottic Vocal cord palsy Laryngeal webs RRP Post-intubation injury Laryngeal clefts Subglottic Subglottic stenosis (congenital or acquired) Haemangioma Subglottic cysts Trachea and bronchus Tracheobronchomalacia Foreign bodies

Ears

OME in children with comorbidity Chronic otitis media Complications of AOM and COM Microtia and atresia Surgical rehabilitation of moderate to profound hearing loss Bone anchored hearing aids Middle ear implants Cochlear implants

Nose

Congenital nasal obstruction and masses Choanal atresia Nasal dermoid Glioma Teratoma Encephalocele Craniosynostosis

Have you visited our website? • Over 1,300 diary listings online

• Society links

• Over 500 journal reviews archived

• Resources for ENTs and Audiologists

www.entandaudiologynews.com • Bookmark us now! ENT & audiology news | www.entandaudiologynews.com

7

Paediatric ENT: why choose this subspecialty? Miss Sujata De, FRCS(ORL-HNS), Consultant Paediatric ENT Surgeon. Correspondence Alder Hey Children’s Hospital, Eaton Road, Liverpool, L12 2AP, UK. E: Su.de@ alderhey.nhs.uk Declaration of Competing Interests None declared.

T

he vast majority of ENT surgeons have some element of paediatric practice – indeed our ‘bread and butter’ has historically comprised grommet insertion and adenotonsillectomy. The old adage ‘children are not little adults’ remains true and Paediatric ENT as a distinct subspecialty was born of a necessity to recognise this in ENT. Essentially paediatric ENT is the practice of ENT surgery in children. This encompasses the common procedures as mentioned above but also the management of conditions that are unique to infants and children such as congenital anomalies and airway disorders that are sequelae of prolonged intubation and / or prematurity. In any case children are not little adults and so it is only fair that their ENT needs are addressed accordingly. Paediatric ENT is a relatively young subspecialty in its own right. It is only in the last 20 years or so that it has had its own subspecialty association – BAPO in the UK, ESPO in Europe, and ASPO in the United States. As a result the paediatric ENT community is a relatively small one with the resulting ease of exchange of ideas, and rapid uptake of innovation. An example of this is the speed at which the treatment of subglottic haemangioma has been revolutionised by the use of propranolol. Paediatric ENT has been incorporated into the assessment and examination process of most ENT training programmes. Specialist experience can be 8

gained by seeking fellowships both in the UK and abroad. There are two types of paediatric ENT surgeon; one who works in general ENT practice but who perhaps takes on the role of paediatric lead in a District General Hospital (DGH). A large proportion of children who require an ENT opinion or management can be seen and managed in a DGH. This paediatric ENT surgeon in this case would be responsible for ensuring that children are treated according to the highest standards possible and to create referral pathways with the local tertiary unit for conditions that cannot be dealt with at a DGH either because of lack of suitable anaesthetic cover or lack of nursing / surgical expertise or ICU backup. The other type of paediatric ENT surgeon works in a tertiary paediatric hospital and in addition to dealing with common childhood ENT disorders in both ‘normal children’ and children with other challenging conditions, also manages conditions specific to children. The tertiary ENT consultant is a ‘generalist’ in that he / she will have to manage all ENT conditions in children. These are fairly evenly spread between otology, rhinology, laryngology and head and neck surgery. One can therefore put to use all the skills accumulated during years of ENT training. There are specialist areas such as paediatric airway, congenital anomalies, cochlear implantation that require specific skills and

ENT & audiology news | www.entandaudiologynews.com

feature expertise. In addition, a lot of collaboration is required particularly in managing children with challenging conditions such as Down’s syndrome, craniofacial conditions and neurological conditions. One has the great privilege of working closely with paediatricians, neonatologists, geneticists and intensivists. Of course the main advantage of being a paediatric ENT surgeon is the opportunity to work with children and to make a real difference to the quality of life of individuals who have the whole of their lives ahead of them. I still remember the surgeon who took out my tonsils. Trivial operation maybe, but he’s the person who inspired me to be a surgeon! One of the challenges of paediatric practice is the lack of a strong evidence base for much of our practice. This has led some to question whether what we do is necessary at all!1 Clinical/ pharmaceutical research in children is obviously much more difficult than in adults. We sometimes have to rely upon evidence from adult research to guide our management principles. Even good research conducted in children has to be interpreted carefully as conclusions cannot be generalised across the board. For example OME poses a very different management challenge in a two year old when compared to a 13 year old with Down’s syndrome! Of course life is not without its challenges and working with infants and children inherently means having to deal with their parents and carers. Infants and younger children cannot communicate and are therefore completely reliant on their parents or carers to express their needs and concerns. Taking a history therefore is a challenge as the parent or carer may bias the explanation of symptoms towards a course of action that they prefer. At some point in time (and this varies from child to child), the child becomes quite capable of expressing him / herself; and then the consultation can be like a game of ping pong with the child claiming one thing while the parents claim another. It is the clinician’s job to decipher the real story and to make an appropriate decision that is in the child’s best interest. Most of the time managing parents and their expectations is a positive part of the experience but there will be occasions when there is disagreement between you and the parents as to what is in the child’s best interests. Most conflict can be resolved with good communication, careful explanation and if necessary mediation by another member of the team. It is always unfortunate when management plans do not result in a favourable outcome. It sometimes becomes necessary particularly in children with complex morbidity to take a step back and decide whether less intervention is a kinder course of action. The loss of a young life is particularly harrowing. Thankfully, in paediatric ENT mortality is rare but it does occur and can be heartbreaking. On the whole paediatric ENT is a very rewarding subspecialty, one that makes a difference to its patients and their families, and one that challenges one’s clinical skills, both outside and inside the operating theatre. !

References 1. Spence D. Bad medicine: paediatric ear, nose and throat surgery. BMJ 2010;341:c6560. British Association for Paediatric Otorhinolaryngology [www.bapo.org.uk]

promote your event in

courses & conferences Ensure your event features in ENT & audiology news, REACHING APPROXIMATELY 16,500 POTENTIAL DELEGATES across the world per issue

RAISE AWARENESS by announcing your event details to our readers well in advance!

ENHANCE your PROFILE by submitting an eye-catching advert to us. . .

. . . or USE OUR DESIGNERS to create a striking advert for you.

For further details contact: Helen Stuart T. +44 (0)131 478 8401 (direct) or +44 (0)131 557 4184 E. [email protected]

www.entandaudiologynews.com

European Society of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology [www.espo.eu.com] American Society of Pediatric Otolaryngology [www.aspo.us]

ENT & audiology news | www.entandaudiologynews.com

9

Combining Adult and Paediatric Practice – is it still feasible? Fiona B MacGregor, MBChB, FRCS, FRCS(ORL), Consultant Otolaryngologist and Honorary Senior Lecturer. Correspondence Gartnavel General Hospital, Great Western Road, Glasgow, G12 0YN, UK. E: Fiona.MacGregor@ ggc.scot.nhs.uk

O

ne of the factors that originally drew me to ENT surgery over 20 years ago was the opportunity to work with both adults and children. Indeed, most consultants would see adults and children in the same clinic and combined operating

lists were commonplace. Practice has changed since then and children are usually seen in

dedicated paediatric clinics by ENT surgeons with a paediatric subspecialty interest. Operations are carried out on paediatric lists with the involvement of paediatric anaesthetists, nurses and other healthcare professionals. Almost all would agree that this is a significant improvement in the delivery of ENT care for the paediatric population.

Declaration of Competing Interests None declared.

There has been much debate about paediatric ear disease and who should manage it

Royal Hospital for Sick Children, Glasgow.

10

Specialising solely in paediatric otolaryngology was unheard of until around 20 years ago. Now, some children’s hospitals in the UK are staffed by a number of ENT surgeons whose sole practice is paediatric. However, there remain a significant number of surgeons who work between the adult and children’s sectors both in teaching and district general hospitals. Generally speaking, specialist paediatric ENT surgeons will turn their hands to all things paediatric – choanal atresia, subglottic stenosis, thyroglossal cysts and even cholesteatomas. In the adult sector, ENT surgeons are often specialised in terms of otology, rhinology, or head and neck surgery. Partly as a consequence of this many ENT surgeons have become reluctant to cover children in the on call setting – often citing a concern about managing the challenge of the difficult airway in a child. This concern has resulted in debate, disagreement and even downright disorder in some ENT departments in the UK! Some would argue that having some experience in adult ENT surgery can enhance a surgeon’s paediatric practice and vice versa. Others believe that it is in the interest of both children and clinicians if the two are entirely separate. At The Royal Hospital for Sick Children,

Glasgow, I work with four full time paediatric ENT colleagues in addition to an associate specialist and a consultant audiological physician. My practice is split approximately 30% paediatric and 70% adult with a specialist interest in head and neck surgery, both benign and malignant, and voice disorders. Three of my colleagues share the complex paediatric airway work and hence I do little in the way of assessment and intervention in the paediatric airway. I cover both adults and children when I am on call and for me (and hopefully my patients) this works, but it has its challenges. In this article I hope to illustrate the advantages and disadvantages of a split workload through my own experiences. I will start with one of the most contentious issues…

On call The common paediatric emergencies include post-tonsillectomy bleeds, tonsillitis, neck abscesses, a variety of foreign bodies in the nose and ear, traumatic injuries and less commonly periorbital cellulitis and mastoiditis. Inhaled foreign bodies are uncommon and are usually referred to specialist paediatric centres. A few of the larger paediatric ENT departments in the UK have separate adult and

A child-friendly environment in a paediatric centre.

ENT & audiology news | www.entandaudiologynews.com

feature

paediatric on call rotas. However, this is more difficult to organise in smaller centres where there may be only two or three ENT surgeons with specialist paediatric skills. Working a ‘1 in 2’ or ‘1 in 3’ is no longer accepted by most and a compromise is usually sought. In Glasgow we now have a hybrid rota with three consultants covering both adults and children, a further four colleagues covering children only and the remainder covering adults only. Does this work? Well, it’s not perfect. It’s difficult to make a swap when you cover both rotas and forward planning is essential. It is no doubt busier for those of us who cover both rotas and it is not possible to be in two places at once. Personally, I have to ensure that I maintain my core skills in paediatric emergencies (for airways please read on). Some major ENT centres remain committed to involve all consultants in both the paediatric and adult rotas. There is certainly the very reasonable argument that consultants should endeavour to maintain their core skills in all subspecialties including paediatrics. After all we still expect otologists to deal with epistaxis, rhinologists to manage neck trauma and head and neck surgeons to drain a mastoid abscess in the emergency situation. Fortunately most of us are in the position that we have helpful colleagues who can assist us when we encounter challenging patients. To maintain skills in paediatric airway intervention I would suggest attending the occasional specialised paediatric airway list and instructional paediatric airway course. It is necessary to understand how to perform a tracheostomy on a young child and to recognisie the differences from the adult procedure, in addition to being comfortable in assembling a paediatric bronchoscope.

From a personal point of view I very much enjoy seeing routine paediatric ENT patients and it is a refreshing contrast to my adult head and neck workload in the West of Scotland!

Head and neck surgery Fortunately, the majority of head and neck pathologies in children are benign – congenital cysts and sinuses, cervical lymphadenopathy and so on; interesting and rewarding to manage. Malignancies in the head and neck region in children are rare and I have found my experience in the adult sector to be invaluable in this situation. Regularly performing for example thyroidectomies and neck dissections in adults is extremely useful when faced with the rare thyroid carcinoma in a child. Having access to the adult head and neck managed clinical network has been invaluable when considering the treatment of rare head and neck tumours, perhaps more often seen in adults. For instance I managed a 12 year old boy with a laryngeal synovial cell sarcoma who ultimately required a total laryngectomy. Decision making was gratefully shared with the network and my adult head and neck team including the theatre staff and speech and language therapist were invaluable in the management and rehabilitation of this young man.

Airway I work in the recognised national paediatric airway centre for Scotland and the vast majority of paediatric airway work is performed electively. Three of my colleagues take on most of this work and I am fortunate that they make themselves available to deal with the problems that sometimes arise.

Otology General paediatric ENT surgery The vast majority of children seen in ENT clinics have problems related to tonsillitis, middle ear effusions, sleep disordered breathing and rhinitis. This is of course managed extremely well by the majority of general ENT surgeons in teaching and district general hospitals. Indeed, the limiting factor in continuing to see children outwith specialist centres is often down to the anaesthetists and their desire to maintain their paediatric anaesthetic skills. No doubt this has been frustrating for many capable surgeons and has resulted in an increased workload of routine ENT procedures in specialist centres. But that is a subject for another day…

There has been much debate about paediatric ear disease and who should manage it. Traditionally, adult otologists have provided this service to paediatric hospitals but the workload has in general been taken up by a number of paediatric surgeons with a particular otological subspecialty interest. What is well recognised is that surgery should be performed by those familiar with the anatomical and pathological variations in young children – and that surgery should be something that he or she performs on a regular basis. In Scotland we have one national cochlear implant centre which is situated at Crosshouse Hospital in Ayrshire. There the surgeons operate on both adults and

ENT & audiology news | www.entandaudiologynews.com

children. However, a small number of the very young and children with complex problems are operated on by these same surgeons at Yorkhill because of the availability of paediatric ICU and specialist anaesthetists and paediatricians. This situation works well for us and we have a good relationship with our implantation colleagues. The insertion of bone anchored hearing aids and aural reconstructions have often been performed by otologists working in the adult sector but an increasing number of paediatric surgeons have developed a specialist interest and expertise in this field.

Rhinology Apart from the snotty nose, adenoidal hypertrophy and allergic rhinitis much of the pathology found is unique to paediatrics – choanal atresia, nasal dermoids, encephaloceles and so on. Functional endoscopic surgery is rarely required (for example cystic fibrosis) and one could argue that this might be an instance where the adult rhinologist may have specific skills to offer.

Logistics Working between the two sectors usually means working at more than one site. Not uncommon these days but there are logistical challenges associated with having two secretaries, two IT systems, two destinations for postal mail, and the supervision of two surgical teams. In addition, I find myself asked to commit to teaching, training and administration commitments in both sectors...

Summary In practice most UK paediatric ENT centres are staffed by a combination of those who work solely with children assisted by a variable number of surgeons who have a combined adult / paediatric practice. The challenge of providing an adequate paediatric on call rota continues. Surgical expertise should be provided by those with specialist paediatric skills but that does not necessarily mean these skills cannot be provided by a surgeon who also works in the adult sector. In my opinion and from personal experience combining adult and paediatric practice is feasible. I find it enjoyable and rewarding despite the challenges. It does however depend on having a good working relationship with your colleagues and I am indebted to mine. I thank my paediatric colleagues throughout the UK who have provided me with information regarding their local paediatric services and their (differing!) opinions on the feasibility of combined practice. ! 11

Failed Extubation in Children: assessment and management options Mr Joe Grainger, FRCS, Consultant Paediatric ENT Surgeon.

D

espite neonatologists’ and paediatric intensivists’ best efforts to reduce laryngeal injury during periods of intubation, approximately 5% of children spending time on the Paediatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU) will require an

unanticipated reintubation within 48-72 hours of being extubated. One of the roles of the paediatric ENT surgeon is to assist in the assessment and management of the child who ‘fails’ extubation, usually following critical illness or major surgery. This article aims to provide an overview of the assessment of these children and look at some of the current management strategies.

Mr Michael Kuo, FRCS, Children’s Ear, Nose & Throat Surgeon. Correspondence Birmingham Children’s Hospital, Steelhouse Lane, Birmingham, B4 6NH, UK. E: [email protected] Declaration of Competing Interests None declared.

Initial assessment Although the child who has failed extubation is likely to have been reintubated long before you as an ENT surgeon arrives on PICU, there is a lot of information to be gleaned from both the staff on the unit and the parents of the child. The history surrounding the intubation episode will give you a significant insight into the likely causes of the failure and whether or not an endoscopic examination of the larynx is likely to be helpful.

What do you want to know? A reasonable approach would be to find out about three areas: the child’s history prior to intubation, the reason for the intubation and what happened around the time of the trial of extubation. Were there problems during the pregnancy or following delivery? If the child spent time on the neonatal unit, try and ascertain if they were intubated and if so how long for. Parents frequently get confused between intubation for ventilation and the passing of a nasogastric tube so try and be as clear as possible. Did the child have noisy breathing of any kind and was this ever investigated? If they are slightly older, have they had issues such as recurrent croup as this may suggest underlying airway disease? Was this admission and intubation related directly to an airway problem or was it for another reason? Frequently, children who fail extubation are not known to have a pre-existing airway problem – they may have been intubated for surgery or for a medical reason such as severe sepsis. These children may have an underlying mild airway problem that has been 12

exacerbated by intubation, or may have developed an airway issue solely as a result of the intubation episode. Upper airway factors such as micrognathia will also have a role and an assessment of the oropharnx should form part of the assessment process. What happened during the admission and around the time of extubation is crucial. A knowledge of the child’s ventilatory requirements and oxygen requirements will indicate whether there is an underlying chest problem. Ideally, prior to extubation, the child should require an FiO2 of less than 0.35 and minimal pressure support. High pressures and a large oxygen requirement may suggest a lower respiratory tract problem. The endotracheal tube size and whether there is an air leak will give an indication as to the size of the subglottis, although with the increasing use of low pressure cuffed paediatric tubes, this information is becoming less useful. Overall, prior to extubation the child should be as well as possible from a cardiac and respiratory point of view in addition to having as little sedation on board as possible. A good relationship between the ENT surgeon and PICU is vital. Whilst in the past it was commonplace for intensivists to attempt extubation multiple times before contacting their local ENT surgeon, it is now becoming more common to involve the ENT surgeon at a much earlier stage. A further trial of extubation may be appropriate if there are factors that can be corrected or improved. However, repeated extubation and reintubation cycles should be avoided as these are likely to result in further laryngeal damage. Twenty-four to

ENT & audiology news | www.entandaudiologynews.com

feature

Table 1. Common causes of failure to extubate. Respiratory Cardiac Neurological Above the larynx

choanal atresia Pierre-Robin sequence

Laryngeal

laryngomalacia bilateral vocal cord immobility granulation tissue/oedema subglottic cysts subglottic stenosis

Below the larynx

repeated extubation and reintubation cycles should be avoided

tracheomalacia bronchomalacia

Figure 1: Intubation related granulation tissue of the glottis – small areas will usually resolved spontaneously following extubation.

Figure 2: Subglottic cysts.

48 hours of dexamethasone (100 micrograms / kg 8 hourly) along with anti-reflux medication (ranitidine 4mg / kg 8 hourly or omeprazole 750 micrograms / kg 12 hourly) may facilitate extubation by reducing oedema and is generally recommended.

Airway endoscopy Assuming that the child's cardiorespiratory status was optimal for their trial of extubation, an airway endoscopy in theatre is likely to be required if the child needs reintubation. This allows the diagnosis to be established, appropriate treatment to be commenced and provides reassurance to those looking after the child. However, if there are factors that can be corrected, these should be addressed prior to considering endoscopy. It is always preferable to perform an assessment on an airway that has not been recently intubated. A formal endoscopic assessment of the airway is performed following removal of the endotracheal tube in the operating theatre. An assessment of vocal fold mobility should be made. The Storz ventilating bronchoscope provides a safe means of assessing the airway whilst at the same time facilitating ventilation if necessary. The summary of the potential causes of failed to extubation can be found in Table 1 although this list should not be regarded as exhaustive.

Figure 4: Early soft subglottic stenosis.

Figure 3: Image of the airway seen in Figure 2, following endoscopic deroofing of cysts.

laryngeal rest. The child is intubated for a period of around two weeks without a further trial of extubation during this time. A smaller tube size is utilised and anti-reflux treatment is optimised. Histological studies have shown that mucosal ulceration may heal without stenosis and therefore, laryngeal rest may represent an alternative option to the cricoid split. However, a two week period of intubation on PICU is not without its problems and this option is therefore used infrequently.

Removal of granulation and deroofing of cysts

Figure 5: Balloon dilatation of the subglottis for a soft granular stenosis.

Initial management Once the diagnosis has been established, treatment can be tailored accordingly. The therapeutic options include the following:

A period of 'laryngeal rest' Providing there is no established firm subglottic stenosis, minor ulceration and oedema may settle with a period of

ENT & audiology news | www.entandaudiologynews.com

Intubation related granulation tissue and cysts are a common finding (Figures 1 and 2). Small areas of granulation can be removed endoscopically following the application of topical epinephrine. Subglottic mucous retention cysts can be carefully de-roofed aiming to leave an area of undamaged mucosa in between cysts to prevent circumferential fibrosis (Figure 3).

Balloon dilatation Extensive granulation and soft stenosis around the endotracheal tube responds well to balloon dilatation (Figures 4 and 5). Radial dilatation crushes granulation and reduces damage to normal mucosa. Balloon dilatation may also be used where 13

feature

Figure 6: Suggested algorithm for the management of children who have failed attempted extubation.

there is an element of firmer stenosis after radial division of the fibrous tissue along with local infiltration of corticosteroid.

Cricoid split The anterior cricoid split was first described by Cotton and Seid in 1980. It is best utilised in neonates that have failed extubation because of significant oedema and developing subglottis stenosis as an alternative to tracheostomy. The cricoid ring is divided anteriorly, allowing an age appropriate endotracheal tube to be passed and any glottic oedema to disperse. The larynx is then rested for five to seven days before a further trial of extubation. The original procedure was described without a graft, however, both thyroid and hyoid cartilage are readily available in the operative field and may be used as in a laryngeal reconstruction to hold open the cricoid ring. Up to 90% of children will be successfully extubated after an anterior cricoid split, thus avoiding the need for tracheostomy. The cricoid ring can also be split endoscopically using a sickle knife. This technique is best performed by those with significant endoscopic airway experience in order to prevent complications and ensure adequate division.

Tracheostomy Whilst a tracheostomy may be regarded as a failure by some, for children who have 14

significant chest disease, severe laryngeal disease, bilateral vocal cord immobility or have failed extubation attempts multiple times, it provides a means of providing a secure airway that can be managed on a ward and avoid the associated morbidity of prolonged ventilation. A tracheostomy enables the larynx to settle and enables airway surgery to be performed electively.

facilitate successful extubation. Therefore, unless there are correctable cardiorespiratory issues, diagnostic endoscopy should be utilised early in cases of extubation failure in order to prevent further mucosal damage. A suggested algorithm for the management of children who have failed extubation is shown is Figure 6. !

Subsequent management Even following successful extubation, the subglottis will continue to evolve over the following weeks as areas of ulceration heal and any residual granulation tissue fibroses. Subsequent follow-up of these children is therefore required until their airway is stable in order to identify developing stenosis. Many will have sustained significant mucosal damage and may require more definitive surgery including laryngotracheal reconstruction.

Summary ‘Failure of extubation’ may be due to many causes and it is important that cardiorespiratory function is optimised prior to further attempts. A detailed history relating to the child’s preintubation status, their reason for intubation and the events surrounding their extubation attempt are important to establish. The paediatric ENT surgeon has, at their disposal a number of endoscopic and open techniques to ENT & audiology news | www.entandaudiologynews.com

FURTHER READING Albert D. Post intubation laryngotracheal stenosis. In Pediatric ENT. Edited by Graham JM, Scadding GK, Bull PD). Berlin: Springer; 2007:223-7. Baisch SD, Wheeler WB, Kurachek SC, Cornfield DN. Extubation failure in pediatric intensive care: incidence and outcomes. Pediatr Crit Care Med 2005;6(3):312-8. Cotton RT, Seid AB. Management of the extubation problem in the premature child. Anterior cricoid split as an alternative to tracheostomy. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1980;89(6 Pt 1):508-11. Eze NN, Wyatt ME, Hartley BE. The role of the anterior cricoid split in facilitating extubation in infants. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2005;69(6):843-6. Lusk RP. Congenital anomalies of the larynx. In Ballenger’s Otorhinolaryngology. Edited by Snow JB, Wackym PA. Connecticut: BC Decker Inc; 2009:815-28.

Paediatric Nasal Emergencies Miss Ann-Louise McDermott, BDS, FDSRCS, PhD, FRCS(ORL-HNS).

N

asal and sinus problems are very common in children however clinicians should be mindful that they do have a risk of serious morbidity and even mortality if not managed appropriately. The following article highlights the main paediatric emer-

gencies and their management.

1. Choanal atresia

Mr Tom Beech, MSc, FRCS(ORL-HNS). Correspondence Miss Ann-Louise McDermott, BDS, FDSRCS, PhD, FRCS(ORL-HNS), Department of Paediatric Otorhinolaryngology, Birmingham Children’s Hospital, Steelhouse Lane, Birmingham, B4 6NH, UK. E: [email protected] Declaration of Competing Interests None declared.

Although nasal and sinus problems are very common in children, clinicians should be mindful that they do have a risk of serious morbidity and even mortality if not managed appropriately

Choanal atresia was first described by Roederer in 1775 and is now accepted as one of the more common congenital abnormalities of the nose.1 It is thought to affect 1:8,000 live births and females are more commonly affected. Choanal atresia may be bilateral or unilateral. The unilateral case may not become apparent until later childhood and may only cause difficulties during breast feeding when the unaffected side is occluded by contact with the breast. Association with other malformations is reported and CHARGE syndrome is the most widely reported. Paediatric assessment and screening for CHD 7 mutation is recommended for infants with bilateral choanal atresia. Bilateral choanal atresia typically presents as a respiratory emergency very soon after birth as neonates lack the ability to mouth breathe. Previous diagnostic tests have included bilateral failure of nasal misting on a metal spatula and failure to pass a soft suction tube through each nasal passage. The gold standard test however is computerised tomography (CT). This confirms the diagnosis, indicates whether the atresia is bony, membranous or mixed and furthermore the thickness and relation to other anatomical structures can be assessed. The airway needs securing in the first instance, usually by means of a endotracheal airway although modifications of a nipple from a feeding bottle have been described.2 Definitive surgery is recommended in the first week of life to create bilateral choanal patency. Orogastric tube feeding is necessary if surgery is delayed. Endoscopic intranasal choanotomy techniques are the most commonly performed and the removal of the posterior vomer is common practice. Surgery for choanal atresia has a significant risk of re-stenosis. It is reported to be higher in children with CHARGE syndrome. It is estimated that a mean of 1.5 to 3 operations are required per patient.2,3 The application of mitomycin C and the use of choanal stents are

still popular with many surgeons in an attempt to reduce the re-stenosis risk.

2. Anterior pyriform aperture stenosis Congenital nasal pyriform aperture stenosis is an unusual cause of nasal emergency presenting as respiratory distress in neonates. The problem is caused by bony overgrowth of the nasal process of the maxilla. The clinical presentations mimic those of bilateral choanal atresia and a CT scan is required to confirm the diagnosis. A pyriform aperture width of 11mm or less associated with a single central incisor, in a term baby is diagnostic.4,5 Early management is to secure the neonatal airway. Bony overgrowth of the pyriform aperture is removed via a sublabial surgical approach. The use of nasal stents is common in the postoperative period. Not all neonates require surgery. Some may be managed conservatively with a simple nasal airway.

3. Sinusitis and its complications Rhinosinusitis is very common in children, and often more extensive than seen in adults. It also has the tendency to resolve spontaneously as the child grows and develops. Acute rhinosinusitis commonly follows an URTI and can have severe complications with spread of infection locally into the orbit with threat to vision and also intracranial spread with a mortality rate quoted as high as 2030%.3 A child presenting with periorbital cellulitis requires an urgent ENT and ophthalmological examination. The presence of proptosis, chemosis, restriction of eye movement, red colour desaturation and reduced visual acuity should alert the clinican to the urgency of the situation. Nasal decongestion and broad spectrum antibiotic therapy should be commenced immediately. It is difficult to clinically identify whether cellulitis is pre- or postseptal. An urgent CT scan with intravenous contrast of the paranasal sinuses, orbits and brain is the investigation of choice.

ENT & audiology news | www.entandaudiologynews.com

15

feature Urgent drainage of the affected sinuses should be performed and orbital infection may be drained either by an endoscopic and / or external approach. For those children with intracranial complications, close cooperation with neurosurgical team is necessary. Early surgical drainage of the involved sinuses is necessary and should ideally be performed at the time of the neurosurgical drainage procedure.

4. Nasal foreign bodies This group of patients constitutes the largest component of paediatric nasal emergencies. Typically the history includes nasal obstruction, foetor and unilateral rhinorrhoea. The important factor is the nature of the foreign body. Ideally the foreign body should be removed in the outpatient setting at the time of presentation however some children require a general anaesthetic. Controversy exists regarding the true risk of aspiration of nasal foreign bodies if they are not removed immediately. Review of the literature reveals very little evidence to support this aspiration risk.6 Inert and nontraumatic nasal foreign bodies are managed on a semielective basis however foreign bodies such as the ‘button’ battery are urgent. The button battery rapidly causes tissue destruction when placed in a damp environment such as the nose, and results in extensive soft tissue destruction which in turn leads to nasal deformity. Examination of both nostrils is advised after foreign body removal to ensure no other foreign matter is present.

5. Epistaxis This a very common problem in childhood but it is often self limiting and of short duration. Epistaxis is most commonly seen in children between the age of three and eight years. Clinicians should have a high index of suspicion for any child that presents with excessive bleeding that fails to settle conservatively. Epistaxis may be the first sign of underlying systemic disease or tumours such as an angiofibroma. The management of paediatric epistaxis depends on the age of the child. Adequate resuscitation is the first line of treatment for epistaxis. Unlike adults however, it is rarely required in children. Digital pressure should be applied to control the bleeding. Topical application of cotton wool soaked in local anaesthetic to the nose is often not tolerated by younger children. Silver nitrate topical nasal cautery may be used. Soft and malleable (resorbable) nasal packs such as Nasopore may also be considered. In children known to have a bleeding diathesis, cautery and nasal packing is best avoided wherever possible and haematology 16

Figure 1: Axial CT scans demonstrating bilateral bony and membranous choanal atresia.

Figure 2: Axial CT scans illustrating Pyriform Aperture Stenosis and a midline central incisor.

Figure 3. Sublabial surgical approach to widen the nasal pyriform aperture.

Figure 4: Axial CT scan (without contrast) showing subperiosteal collection within the right orbit and complete opacification of the right ethmoidal air cells.

advice regarding administration of appropriate clotting factors should be sought.

6. Nasal trauma and septal haematoma Paediatric nasal trauma is a common presentation to the Accident and Emergency department but not all cases are then referred to ENT. In the face of any paediatric nasal trauma it is important for the nasal septum to be properly examined for any signs of a septal haematoma. Failure to identify such an injury may result in cartilage necrosis, abscess formation and later a saddle deformity. The external structure of the nose in young children is predominantly cartilaginous and the nasal bones are soft. Fracture of the nasal bones is therefore very rare particularly in children under the age of six years and displacement is a more common finding. Manipulation is usually all that is required for such displacements. A septal haematoma (both unilateral or ENT & audiology news | www.entandaudiologynews.com

bilateral) requires urgent evacuation if the cartilage is to be saved and abscess formation is to be avoided. Broad spectrum antibiotic therapy is advised for five to seven days. !

References 1. Devgan BK, Harkins WB. Congenital choanal atresia. Twenty years experience. Int Surg 1977;62(8):397-9. 2. Froehlich P, Ayari-Khalfallah S: Management of Choanal Atresia. In: Pediatric ENT. Edited by Graham JM, Scadding GK, Bull PD. New York: Springer; 2007;291-4. 3. Samadi DS, Shah UK, Handler SD. Choanal atresia: a twenty year review of medical co morbidities and surgical outcomes. Laryngoscope 2003;113(2):254-8. 4. Belden CJ, Mancusso AA, Schmalfuss IM. CT features of congenital nasal piriform aperture stenosis: initial experience. Radiology 1999;213(2):495-501. 5. Rollins N, Booth T, Biavati M. Case 40: congenital pyriform aperture stenosis. Radiology 2001;221(2):392-4. 6. Qureshi AA, Lowe DA, McKiernan DC. The origin of bronchial foreign bodies: a retrospective study and literature review. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2009;266(10):1645-8.

Neck Abscesses in Children Louise Melia, MBChB, MRCS, ST5 ENT, Royal Hospital for Sick Children, Yorkhill, Glasgow, G3 8SJ, UK.

C

ervical lymphadenopathy in children is extremely common, and neck infections account for a significant proportion of acute paediatric otolaryngology admissions and therefore resource allocation. Although a high proportion of

acute lymphadenitis resolve with antibiotic therapy, a significant number will progress to a suppurative collection requiring surgical incision and drainage, as well as intravenous antibiotics and prolonged hospital stay.

Superficial lymph node abscess Haytham Kubba, Consultant Paediatric Otolaryngologist, Royal Hospital for Sick Children, Yorkhill, Glasgow, G3 8SJ, UK. Correspondence E: louisemelia07@ gmail.com Declaration of Competing Interests None declared.

Acute lymphadenitis is common in children, and usually presents as a swollen lymph node or nodes after an upper respiratory tract infection (URTI). Superficial lymph node abscesses tend to present with a triad of neck swelling, neck pain and pyrexia. In addition, patients may have poor oral intake. Children may have signs or symptoms of sepsis, and may be dehydrated, and this needs addressed immediately.1 Lymph node abscesses are usually of bacterial aetiology, with infections potentially arising from the oropharynx or anterior nares. The most frequently isolated organism is Staphlococcus aureus.2,3 Treatment for superficial neck abscesses is surgical and medical. Small abscesses of less than 3ml volume can be treated with intravenous antibiotics only. Initial surgical incision and drainage with cultures is reserved for patients presenting with typical rapid onset neck mass and symptoms consistent with abscess such as fever

and increased white blood cell count.4 The main issue for the surgeon is to distinguish those children who require incision and drainage from those who can be managed conservatively. Clinical assessment for fluctuance, and ultrasound for liquefaction are the usual means for doing this, although both are fallible.

Peritonsillar abscess This can be difficult to diagnose. In a frightened, toxic child it may not be possible to examine the oropharynx due to trismus and poor co-operation. An experienced ultrasonographer may get surprisingly good views of the tonsil to allow diagnosis. Some cases will improve with intravenous antibiotics, but most will need to proceed to surgery with a presumptive diagnosis only. A senior anaesthetist and a gas induction are mandatory. The trismus will usually relax once the child is anaesthetised. At this point, a tonsillectomy is probably the most reasonable course of action if quinsy is confirmed.

Floor of mouth Infection in the floor of mouth is usually secondary to a dental source, and can present with swelling in the submandibular, submental or submasseteric regions (Figures 1a and 1b). Life threatening airway compromise can develop rapidly and intubation or tracheostomy may be needed. Management should include drainage of the abscess as well as treatment of the primary infective source, therefore a dentist or maxillofacial surgeon should be involved. Antibiotics must provide anaerobic cover.

Deep neck space infections

Figure 1a: Floor of mouth infection.

Figure 1b: Intraoperative image of floor of mouth infection.

Deep neck infections spread along the fascial planes and spaces of the head and neck region. Despite the widespread use of antibiotics for the early treatment of cervical infections and worldwide

ENT & audiology news | www.entandaudiologynews.com

17

feature

Figure 2: CT scan of large parapharyngeal abscess.

improvements in dental care and oral hygiene, deep neck infections remain relatively frequent. Life threatening complications such as airway damage, jugular vein thrombosis, mediastinitis, pericarditis, pneumonia, and arterial erosion may develop because of delays in diagnosis and treatment.5 Abscesses in the retropharyngeal space often present as airway emergencies in infants. They develop from suppuration in retropharyngeal lymph nodes. The presentation is similar to epiglottitis with pyrexia, drooling and soft stridor. Drainage can be achieved transorally, but an experienced anaesthetist is essential to secure the airway. Infection in the parapharyngeal space can be due to dental infection or tonsillitis as well as the usual URTI. Presentation can be insidious with little external swelling in the neck and only ‘soft’ signs such as low grade pyrexia, malaise and torticollis. CT scanning is helpful in confirming the diagnosis and planning the surgical approach (Figure 2).6 An external approach allows a drain to be placed to prevent reaccumulation. In some cases, depending on the position of the abscess in relation to the great vessels and oropharyngeal mucosa, it may be possible to drain intraorally and avoid a scar, but the risk of reaccumulation is higher.

Atypical mycobacterial infection This is surprisingly common and often misdiagnosed. The organisms (M. bovis, M. avium intracellulare, and so on) are widely present in the soil and in the limescale deposits in your shower head. They enter via oral ingestion and pass to the regional lymph nodes, typically parotid and submandibular nodes. The child presents with a neck lump, which develops violet-red skin discolouration, with eventual skin breakdown (Figure 3a). A sinus discharges for months before healing with a puckered scar (Figure 3b). This whole process can take up to three years to complete. 18

Figure 3a: Typical appearance of atypical mycobacterial infection.

The diagnosis is clinical on the basis of the characteristic skin appearance in a child who remains systemically well and apyrexial and whose history is longer than would be expected for a bacterial abscess (usually a few weeks). Aspiration is controversial: while it may provide a sample for Ziehl-Neelsen staining, this comes at the cost of potentially causing skin breakdown and a discharging sinus, compromising the ultimate cosmetic result. Incision and drainage should clearly be avoided for the same reason. Culture takes six weeks and is only positive in a minority of cases. A chest x-ray is mandatory, but tuberculin testing is only necessary for children at high risk of TB. Some children will resolve spontaneously in a short time, or respond to prolonged treatment (3-9 months) with antibiotics. Single-agent regimens (clarithromycin, ciprofloxacin) and multi-agent regimens have been used (clarithromycin plus ethambutol, isoniazid or rifabutin). How many children will settle with antibiotics is currently unknown. For the remainder, surgery should be considered if it will shorten the duration of the disease and if the cosmetic result is likely to be better than that resulting from natural resolution. If antibiotics are to be used, follow-up should be early and frequent to identify those who are not resolving: in these children surgery should be done early to prevent skin loss and optimise the cosmetic outcome. Surgical excision is the treatment of choice if the skin is at risk of breakdown or if the disease progresses despite antibiotic therapy. Surgery is difficult due to the large mass of matted nodes and overlying collarstud abscesses in the subcutaneous plane. A block dissection of lymph nodes will suffice for limited disease but a partial parotidectomy and supraomohyoid neck dissection are not uncommonly required for extensive disease. Discoloured skin can usually be saved if it is in a cosmetically obvious place

Figure 3b: Burnt-out atypical mycobacterial infection allowed to run its course without treatment over 2.5 years – early surgery is recommended to avoid this sort of cosmeticallyobvious scarring.

(such as the cheek) by curetting the subcutaneous abscess from the deep surface of the dermis. The skin colour will eventually return to normal. In such cases, we would suggest clarithromycin for three months postoperatively, but there is currently no evidence to support this. In cases where the skin has already broken down, skin must either be excised or the disease left alone to run its course.

Conclusion Neck abscesses in children can present in a variety of forms. Clinical assessment should be used in conjunction with ultrasound and CT scanning to determine those children that require surgical management with incision and drainage. It is vital that the airway remains safe throughout, and that an experienced anaesthetist is involved in cases where there is any concern. Dentists or maxillofacial surgeons need to be involved if there is any suspicion of a primary dental source. !

References 1. Butler KM, Baker CJ. Cervical lymphadenitis. Paediatric Infectious Diseases. Philadelphia: WB Sauders Company; 1992:220-30. 2. Simo R, Hartley C, Rapado F, Zarod AP, Sanyal D, Rothera MP. Microbiology and antibiotic treatment of head and neck abscesses in children. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci 1998;23(2):164-8. 3. Inman JC, Rowe M, Ghostine M, Fleck T. Pediatric neck abscesses: changing organisms and empiric therapies. Laryngoscope 2008;118(12):2111-4. 4. Dodds B, Maniglia AJ. Peritonsillar and neck abscesses in the pediatric age group. Laryngoscope 1988;98(9):956-9. 5. Marioni G, Staffieri A, Parisi S, Marchese-Ragona R, Zuccon A, Staffieri C, Sari M, Speranzoni C, de Filippis C, Rinaldi R. Rational diagnostic and therapeutic management of deep neck infections: analysis of 233 consecutive cases. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 2010;119(3):181-7. 6. Wetmore RF, Mahboubi S, Soyupak SK. Computed tomography in the evaluation of pediatric neck infections. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1998;119(6):624-7.

ENT & audiology news | www.entandaudiologynews.com

Congenital Midline Nasal Masses Compared Mary-Louise Montague, MBChB (Hons), FRCS ORLHNS, Consultant Otolaryngologist, Honorary Senior Clinical Lecturer, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK. Correspondence Department of ENT Surgery, The Royal Hospital for Sick Children, 9 Sciennes Road, Edinburgh, EH9 1LF, UK. E: mary-louise.montague @luht.scot.nhs.uk Declaration of Competing Interests None declared.

N

asal dermoid cysts, encephaloceles and gliomas are the most frequently seen congenital midline nasal masses. Overall congenital midline nasal masses are rare. Although rare they are clinically important because of their

potential for connection to the central nervous system. Their potential to cause disfig-

urement, destruction of the cranial base and meningitis should not be underestimated. This article compares the embryological development, clinical presentation, optimal imaging, complications and surgical management of nasal dermoid cysts, encephaloceles and gliomas.

Embryology Congenital midline nasal masses are believed to share similar embryogenetic origins. A failure of the normal separation of the different germ cell layers is considered to be causative. Consequently, all patients with congenital midline nasal masses must be considered as potentially having an intracranial extension. During formation of the skull base and nose the mesenchymal structures are formed from several centres which eventually fuse and ossify. Before fusion there are recognised spaces between these elements – the fonticulus frontalis, prenasal space, and foramen cecum (Table 1). They are important in the development of congenital midline nasal masses. During development dura projects through the foramen cecum and attaches to skin. This connection is normally lost when dura separates from nasal skin and retracts through the foramen cecum. If skin maintains an attachment to the underlying fibrous tissue, nasal capsule, or dura, epithelial elements may be pulled into the prenasal space with or without dural connection, this predisposing to dermoid cyst formation.1 The hypothesis for the formation of gliomas is similar to that of nasal dermoids.

They are thought to develop from extracranial rests of glial tissue persisting after abnormal closure of the fonticulus frontalis. A second theory hypothesises that they may represent encephaloceles that have lost their cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) connection. Encephaloceles are thought to develop as a result of abnormal closure of the fonticulus frontalis resulting in herniation of meninges with or without brain tissue.

Clinical presentation Of the three anomalies, nasal dermoid cysts are the most common accounting for approximately 60% of all congenital midline nasal lesions.2 The mode of presentation and other characteristics of these lesions are compared in Table 2. A positive Furstenberg test refers to expansion of a lesion with crying, Valsalva manoeuvre, or compression of the ipsilateral jugular veins.

Optimal imaging All suspected congenital abnormalities of the nose require radiological evaluation, the objective being to confirm the clinical diagnosis, delineate any intracranial involvement and detect associated abnormalities. It is crucial not to biopsy or excise any intra- or extranasal mass in infants and children prior to complete work-up,

Table 1. Potential spaces important in the development of congenital midline nasal masses. ●





Fonticulus frontalis – space between the frontal and nasal bones which eventually fuses with the foramen cecum to create a separation between intracranial and extracranial structures Prenasal space – space between the nasal bones and the nasal capsule (the precursor of the septum and nasal cartilages) Foramen cecum – formed by articulation of a small notch at lower end of the frontal crest of the frontal bone with the ethmoid

ENT & audiology news | www.entandaudiologynews.com

19

feature Table 2. Nasal dermoid cysts, encephaloceles and gliomas compared. Nasal Dermoid Cyst

Nasal Encephalocele

Nasal Glioma

Sex predilection

Occur equally between sexes

More frequent in males

Occur equally between sexes

Presentation

Slow growing midline mass, midline sinus or combination of these

Midline mass

Firm mass

Nasal obstruction

Slow growing firm, non pulsatile unilateral nasal

Hypertelorism

Polyp – reddish coloured sometimes with telangiectasias

Hair protruding from sinus tract/cyst pathognomonic

Site

Broad nose

Intermittent discharge of sebaceous material

CSF Rhinorrhoea

Nasal obstruction

Inflammation/abscess

Recurrent meningitis

CSF Rhinorrhoea

Anywhere from glabella to philtrum of lip. Lower 1/3 of nasal bridge most common

Root of nose or inferior to nasal bones

60% Extranasal – near root of nose 30% Intranasal – typically medial to middle turbinate 10% Combined

a

c

Transillumination

No

Yes

Compression

May be fluctuant -ve Furstenberg test

Soft and compressible +ve Furstenberg test

Non compressible -ve Furstenberg test

Contents

Skin and dermal elements including hair follicles, sweat glands and sebaceous glands

Meninges with or without brain tissue

Benign masses of glial tissue containing large aggregates of astrocytes and fibrous connective tissue enveloping blood vessels

Intracranial extension

Up to 20-45%

All

15%-20%

Frequency of associated abnormalites

40% associated with craniofacial malformations

30-40%

Generally isolated anomalies

b

d

Figure 1: CT and MRI demonstrating a nasal dermoid cyst with intracranial extension. (a) Axial CT showing separation of the nasal bones. (b) Widening of the foramen cecum on coronal CT. (c & d) T1 and T2-weighted sagittal MR views respectively showing multiple cysts extending intracranially with attachment to dura.

20

No

including imaging, due to the risk of CSF leakage and meningitis if there is an intracranial connection. The complimentary roles of high resolution computed tomography (HRCT) and multiplanar MRI in congenital midline nasal masses are much quoted in the literature.3 But MRI is undoubtedly the best imaging modality with the distinct advantages of more precise soft tissue imaging, direct sagittal imaging planes and the possibility to generate multiple tissue contrasts. Many infants and children will require general anaesthesia for adequate MRI evaluation but this is justified in the knowledge that surgical planning is optimised. Common CT findings in nasal dermoid cysts are bifid nasal bones, a thickened or bifid nasal septum, and a circular translucency under the nasal bones. The presence of a widened foramen cecum or a bifid crista galli on CT suggests intracranial extension of the dermoid. Non visualisation of an intracranial mass on CT does not exclude the possibility of intracranial extension. False positives may also be seen with CT and may be accounted for by anatomic variants and incomplete ossification of the crista galli and foramen cecum (14% of children younger than one year of age). Nasal dermoids appear strikingly hyperintense on T1-weighted MRI due to their fat content (Figure 1).

ENT & audiology news | www.entandaudiologynews.com

feature

Figure 2: A midline nasal dermoid cyst presenting with local infection and abscess formation extending superolaterally. The dorsal midline pit or sinus is apparent.

Figure 3: Intranasal glioma obstructing the right nasal cavity of a neonate. This had no intracranial attachment and was removed endoscopically with a microdebrider. A nasopharyngeal airway was required preoperatively.

Nasal gliomas are usually isodense on CT. Calcifications are reported rarely and cystic changes occasionally within them. On MRI nasal gliomas are usually hyperintense on T2-weighted images with variable intensity on T1-weighted images. Because of its high soft-tissue resolution MRI is particularly useful in imaging encephaloceles. MRI demonstrates the pathway of intracranial herniation and the presence of associated anomalies more clearly than CT. MRI will also differentiate encephalocele from glioma if an adjacent communicating CSF space is present. The lack of ionising radiation associated with MRI is especially important in children who may on occasion require follow-up imaging.

causing remodelling and deformity of the nasal bones as well as progressive facial disfigurement. Obstruction of the nasal passage and nasolacrimal duct can occur causing respiratory distress in the neonate and epiphora on the affected side respectively (Figure 3).

Complications Prompt diagnosis and management is essential in light of the potential for complications.

Dermoid cysts Failure to recognise and treat this condition promptly may lead to progressive enlargement of the cyst and bony and cartilaginous distortion of the nose. There is also potential for primary or recurrent infection that may progress to loss or scarring of overlying skin, meningitis, brain abscess, cavernous sinus thrombosis, or periorbital cellulitis (Figure 2). Encephaloceles and gliomas Untreated these may be complicated by CSF rhinorrhoea, meningitis and intracranial abscess. Both may also expand gradually

Surgical management Treatment of congenital midline nasal masses requires early, well-planned, careful, complete surgical resection. Nasal dermoid cysts must be removed intact as even a small epithelial remnant can lead to recurrence. The external rhinoplasty approach has largely replaced midline vertical and lateral rhinotomy incisions.4 It provides excellent exposure of the nasal dorsum and allows sinus tracts to be followed and removed in their entirety by providing an adequate angle of approach to and visualisation of the anterior skull base. More control can be exerted during osteotomies and the aesthetic outcome is vastly superior compared to a midline dorsal incision. Cartilage grafts are occasionally required for dorsal augmentation. For dermoids with substantial intracranial components a combined procedure with a neurosurgeon may be required. A neurosurgical approach combined with either an external rhinoplasty approach or lateral rhinotomy is generally recommended for encephaloceles and gliomas with intracranial extension. A number of cases of successful endoscopic microdebrider excision of small gliomas with and without evidence of intracranial extension have now also been reported. !

ENT & audiology news | www.entandaudiologynews.com

It is crucial not to biopsy or excise any intra- or extranasal mass in infants or children prior to complete work-up, including imaging, due to the risk of CSF leakage and meningitis if there is an intracranial connection References 1. Charrier JB, Rouillon I, Roger G, Denoyelle F, Josset P, Garabedian EN. Craniofacial dermoids: an embryological theory unifying nasal dermoid sinus cysts. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 2005;42(1):51-7. 2. Brown K, Brown OE. Congenital Malformations of the nose. In: Pediatric Otolaryngology Head & Neck Surgery, 3rd edition. Edited by Cummings CW. St Louis: Mosby; 1998:92-8. 3. Barkovich AJ, Vandermarck P, Edwards MS, Cogen PH. Congenital nasal masses: CT and MR imaging features in 16 cases. Am J Neuroradiol 1991;12(1):105-16. 4. Bilkay U, Gundogan H, Ozek C, Tokat C, Gurler T, Songur E, Cagdas A. Nasal dermoid sinus cysts and the role of open rhinoplasty. Ann Plast Surg 2001;47(1):8-14 5. Agirdir B, Derin A, Ozbilim G, Ozçaglar H. Endoscopic management of intranasal glioma. J Pediatric Surg 2004;39(10):1571-3.

21

Virus Infection of the Paediatric Airway and Chronic Disease Effects Adam J Donne, PhD, FRCS(ORL-HNS), Consultant Paediatric Otolaryngologist and Honorary Senior Lecturer.

W

ithin the realms of Paediatric ENT arguably the most important airway infecting viruses are the types that result in bronchiolitis and Recurrent Respiratory Papillomatosis (RRP). Both Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV)

and Human Papillomavirus (HPV) can result in chronic conditions. This article reviews some of the evidence published on the effect of these viruses upon the paediatric airway. This article does not intend to explore all viral aetiologies of bronchiolitis but rather indicate the relative complexity of this condition. Chronic airway disease implies a group of airway diseases, typically chronic obstrucMichael P Rothera, Royal Manchester Children's Hospital, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9WL, UK. Correspondence Adam J Donne, PhD, FRCS(ORL-HNS), Consultant Paediatric Otolaryngologist and Honorary Senior Lecturer, Alder Hey Children’s NHS Foundation Trust, Alder Hey, Eaton Road, Liverpool, L12 2AP, UK. E: ajdonne@ doctors.org.uk Declaration of Competing Interests AJD has spoken /lecturered at events sponsored by Sanof Pasteur MSD.

22

tive pulmonary airway disease. RSV may indeed result in chronic airway disease however this article focuses on the longer term viral effects. HPV infections can result in a disease of chronic duration Recurrent Respiratory Papillomatosis.

RSV

who have a predisposed risk. A 20 year prospective study reports that croup before two years of age generates an increased risk of asthma until adulthood independently of development of atopy.3 Viruses are not the only risk for bronchiolitis as passive smoking is a significant risk.4

RSV usually causes simple coryzal symptoms but it can result in bronchiolitis and pneumonia. RSV infection is common however, premature babies are more at risk as they have weaker immunity and a possibility of chronic lung disease. Chronic lung disease of prematurity is also termed bronchopulmonary dysplasia. It is thought to result from damage to lung tissue especially in the very premature hence low birth weight babies requiring mechanical ventilation. RSV is associated with an increased rate of asthma. Term babies who have RSV as infants are ten times more likely to have bronchodilators by eight to 10 years of age.1 This has been confirmed in other studies that identified asthma was present in 30% of children previously hospitalised for RSV compared to 3% in age and gender-matched controls.2 Controversy exists as to whether RSV causes asthma or simply highlights the children

Croup (laryngotracheobronchitis) is characterised by a barking cough, stridor and hoarseness. Numerous definitions appear to exist in the published literature but they are based upon the clinical picture. Croup is caused by a viral infection resulting in swelling of the subglottis and on a chest radiograph would classically give a church steeple outline in the subglottis (Figure 1). On endoscopy the subglottic inflammation is visible (Figure 2). Croup is most commonly caused by parainfluenza virus type 1 and 2, other causes include RSV,

Figure 1: Image of church steeple sign on chest radiograph is characteristic of croup.

Figure 2: Endoscopic image demonstrating laryngeal inflammation and reduced subglottic airway.

Croup

ENT & audiology news | www.entandaudiologynews.com

feature coronavirus, adenovirus, metapneumovirus, etc.5 The severity of croup can be classified by the Westley score into mild, moderate or severe;6 though this is primarily of research value. Recurrent croup is poorly defined. Originally, it was thought that recurrent croup did not have a viral aetiology however RT-PCR studies indicate that the viral aetiologies are similar. Up to 6% of children under four years suffer from recurrent croup.7 The causes of recurrent croup include: Subglottic stenosis,8 Asthma 17%9 and GERD 60%.9 However, inhaled steroids and GERD therapy result in an improvement in 77%.9 The rate of subglottic stenosis in reports on recurrent croup does vary and may reflect referral practices.

Recurrent Respiratory Papillomatosis RRP is caused by HPV, predominantly types 6 and 11. This condition affects children and adults and typically has a more locally aggressive nature in children but very rarely undergoes malignant transformation. The likelihood of transformation has resulted in the terminology low risk (6 and 11) and high-risk (types 16 and 18) of malignant change. RRP is extremely difficult to treat due to the recurrent nature and the varied activity over the course of the disease. Many fundamental questions about RRP remain unanswered, perhaps the most important being why so many people are infected (albeit transiently) by HPV but so few develop disease. There is geographical variation in HPV prevalence from cervical smear study data, however the prevalence varies according to age and there in now a recognised U-shaped age-dependent distribution curve for prevalence.10 The prevalence for the UK is approximately 520% depending upon age group.

Why does HPV manifest as RRP? This may be due to a problem with host immunity or HPV factors / cofactors which are currently undefined. Detection of HPV has improved over the last 20 years. Originally techniques were in situ hybridisation methods but PCR techniques are more sensitive however even these reply upon searching for a specific DNA sequence. This explains why additional HPV types have only recently been identified in RRP tissue. Could it be that different HPV have different prognostic potential? Many now believe that HPV 11 causes more aggressive disease than HPV6 though age of onset is more important than either 6 or 11.11 There are 19 HPV6 variants and 10 HPV11 variants

Figure 3: Endoscopic image of Recurrent Respiratory Papillomatosis.

and no commercially available test attempts to identify these.12 It is highly probable that the variants are important and differ in activity. Indeed in vitro studies go some way to prove this to be the case for some variants.13

Clinical management The endoscopic appearance of RRP is characteristic (Figure 3). There is difficulty in defining how frequently to perform MLTB surgery and papillomatous tissue clearance. Obviously the first surgery depends upon the extent of disease and potential for airway compromise at presentation. The second surgery should probably be around four to six weeks later. This will allow an assessment of the aggressiveness of the condition, though each patient’s condition does vary throughout its course. There are numerous methods for papillomatous clearance but cold techniques allow less collateral thermal damage hence better voice quality outcomes than laser techniques14 and the more laser procedures the worse the voice quality.15 This, plus the addition of more controllable techniques such as small laryngeal microdebriders, means that lasers seem to be used less frequently now even though they do offer a very precise area to be targeted. Coblation is a relatively new method which allows covalent bonds within tissue to be broken down due to generation of a flux of sodium ion yet the temperature generated is not greater than 60°C. Irrespective of the method used best practice should include a tissue biopsy at every surgery as the naked eye cannot differentiate between papillomatosis and early carcinoma. This is the safest way to ensure that an emerging carcinoma is not missed.

Adjuvant therapy There have been many adjuvant therapies used, most with no direct scientific foundation for their use in RRP. The most contemporary is cidofovir which is a nucleoside analogue which, on entering the cell

ENT & audiology news | www.entandaudiologynews.com

undergoes two stage phosphorylation process. At this point the molecule resembles a nucleotide and can then be incorporated into expanding DNA. Scientific studies have shown that cidofovir has effects against HPV 16 (high risk)16 but no study has demonstrated such an effect with HPV6 or 11 (low risk).17 It was reasonable to assume that cidofovir may have been effective and the patient is more complex than a simple cell model. However, evidence does show that cidofovir in altered human cells that contain an HPV 6 gene (E6) results in changes in gene expression and results in an environment in which malignancy may develop.18 The cells that did not contain HPV did not demonstrate the same gene expression. So the risk of malignancy is cidofovir plus HPV. Rodent studies have shown cidofovir to be carcinogenic though this was not found to be the case in primates.19 There are no absolutely convincing reports of carcinoma following cidofovir exposure though it may be that the effects have not been fully appreciated. For example smoking is thought to be very carcinogenic yet only causes cancer in 10-15%.20 Radiation causes thyroid cancer but anything from three to 60 years post exposure.21 It could be that cidofovir has a low potency with a long duration before malignant effect is seen. The in vitro work demonstrated that at high enough doses cidofovir killed all cells. However, at lower (sub-lethal) doses a genetic environment was created in which malignant transformation might be possible.18 HPV exists not only at the point of the papillomas but also other areas of the neighbouring airway tissue and trachea.22 There must be a lowering gradient of drug the further away from the cidofovir injection site. Indeed, it is conceivable that HPV infected (but otherwise normal in appearance) trachea might develop a malignancy if exposed to this low dose. Indeed, such a report does exist.23 At the very least when taking consent for cidofovir administration to control RRP a risk of ‘unquantifiable malignant potential’ should be identified to the patient. Summarising the outcomes of cidofovir treatments from numerous published articles it does appear that cidofovir has some positive effect24 but it is not a cure and the administration regime should be carefully controlled. In vitro work has indicated that sub-lethal doses appear to stimulate growth of cells containing HPV genes and this observation has been made clinically with too long an interval between cidofovir administrations.25 23

feature trials and initial post-marketing surveillance conducted in several continents show both vaccines to be safe.”27

Current research

Figure 4: Gardasil vaccine.

Alpha-interferon has historically been used and summarising the results would indicate that the numbers undergoing some element of resolution is less than with cidofovir. Interferon works by stimulating the immune response against virus infections. The side-effects of alpha-interferon were frequently nausea and vomiting with a potential for hepatic derangement. The usage of an adjuvant should only be considered when there have been at least four interventions per year to control the airway (RRP task force guideline). Prevention is better than cure and it seems appropriate to offer a prophylactic vaccine if possible. Unfortunately the current UK HPV vaccination programme

administers Cervarix which is effective against high risk HPV whereas Gardasil is also effective against HPV 6 and 11 (Figure 4). From the perspective of RRP it seems more appropriate to offer Gardasil. There have not been studies to evaluate the effect of Gardasil directly upon the rate of RRP due to numerous problems, not least the relative rarity of the condition. Genital warts (condylomata accuminata) are caused by the same HPV types 6 / 11 and it has been shown that Gardasil did reduce the development of genital warts.26 The implication is that Gardasil would do the same for RRP. Given the potential concerns of cidofovir safety it is reassuring that the WHO reports that, “Data from clinical

Dr Farrel Buchinsky in Pittsburg, USA is working to identify the genetic susceptibility links to the development of RRP. He requires blood and tissue samples from patients for this major NIHR funded study. Ethical approval has been granted for the first UK site and involvement is encouraged to make this important study a success. For information contact Adam Donne at the email address provided above.

Conclusion Viral infections are common and potentially important in childhood. They may have long-term effects. Increasing numbers of viruses are being found to result in bronchiolitis and the balance of evidence would suggest this is important in the development of asthma. HPV is remarkably common also yet predominantly transient. The factors that make HPV result in disease are not understood. There is no antiviral agent which effectively targets HPV 6 / 11. Vaccines and further research provide hope for the future. ■

References 1 Noble V, Murray M, Webb MS, Alexander J, Swarbrick AS, Milner AD. Respiratory status and allergy nine to 10 years after acute bronchiolitis. Arch Dis Child 1997;76(4):315-9. 2 Sigurs N, Bjarnason R, Sigurbergsson F, Kjellman B. Respiratory syncytial virus bronchiolitis in infancy is an important risk factor for asthma and allergy at age 7. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2000;161(5):1501-7. 3 Piippo-Savolainen E, Remes S, Kannisto S, Korhonen K, Korppi M. Asthma and lung function 20 years after wheezing in infancy: results from a prospective follow-up study. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2004;158(11):1070-6. 4 Jones LL, Hashim A, McKeever T, Cook DG, Britton J, Leonardi-Bee J. Parental and household smoking and the increased risk of bronchitis, bronchiolitis and other lower respiratory infections in infancy: systematic review and meta-analysis. Respir Res 2011;12:5. 5. Wall SR, Wat D, Spiller OB, Gelder CM, Kotecha S, Doull IJ. The viral aetiology of croup and recurrent croup. Arch Dis Child 2009;94(5):359-60. 6 Westley CR, Cotton EK, Brooks JG. Nebulized racemic epinephrine by IPPB for the treatment of croup: a double-blind study. Am J Dis Child 1978;132(5):484-7. 7 Hide DW, Guyer BM. Recurrent croup. Arch Dis Child 1985;60(6):585-6. 8 Kwong K, Hoa M, Coticchia JM. Recurrent croup presentation, diagnosis, and management. Am J Otolaryngol 2007;28(6):401-7. 9. Arslan Z, Cipe FE, Ozmen S, Kondolot M, Piskin IE, Yöney A. Evaluation of allergic sensitization and gastroesophageal reflux disease in children with recurrent croup. Pediatr Int 2009;51(5):661-5. 10. de Sanjosé S, Diaz M, Castellsagué X, Clifford G, Bruni L, Muñoz N, Bosch FX. Worldwide prevalence and genotype distribution of cervical human papillomavirus DNA in women with normal cytology: a meta-analysis. Lancet Infect Dis 2007;7(7):453-9.

24

11. Buchinsky FJ, Donfack J, Derkay CS, Choi SS, Conley SF, Myer CM 3rd, McClay JE, Campisi P, Wiatrak BJ, Sobol SE, Schweinfurth JM, Tsuji DH, Hu FZ, Rockette HE, Ehrlich GD, Post JC. Age of child, more than HPV type, is associated with clinical course in recurrent respiratory papillomatosis. PLoS ONE 2008;3(5):e2263. 12. Donne AJ, Hampson L, Homer JJ, Hampson IN. The role of HPV type in Recurrent Respiratory Papillomatosis. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2009;74(1):7-14. 13. Heinzel PA, Chan SY, Ho L, O'Connor M, Balaram P, Campo MS, Fujinaga K, Kiviat N, Kuypers J, Pfister H, Steinberg BM, Tay SK, Villa LL, Bernard HU. Variation of human papillomavirus type 6 (HPV-6) and HPV11 genomes sampled throughout the world. J Clin Microbiol 1995;33(7):1746-54. 14. Holler T, Allegro J, Chadha NK, Hawkes M, Harrison RV, Forte V, Campisi P. Voice outcomes following repeated surgical resection of laryngeal papillomata in children. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2009;141(4):522-6. 15 Crockett DM, McCabe BF, Shive CJ. Complications of laser surgery for recurrent respiratory papillomatosis. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1987;96(6):639-44. 16. Abdulkarim B, Sabri S, Deutsch E, Chagraoui H, Maggiorella L, Thierry J, Eschwege F, Vainchenker W, Chouaïb S, Bourhis J. Antiviral agent Cidofovir restores p53 function and enhances the radiosensitivity in HPV-associated cancers. Oncogene 2002;21(15):2334-46. 17 Donne AJ, Hampson L, He XT, Rothera MP, Homer JJ, Hampson IN. Effects of cidofovir on a novel cellbased test system for recurrent respiratory papillomatosis. Head Neck 2007;29(8):741-50. 18. Donne AJ, Hampson L, He XT, Day PJ, Salway F, Rothera MP, Homer JJ, Hampson IN. Potential risk factors associated with the use of cidofovir to treat benign human papillomavirus-related disease. Antivir Ther 2009;14(7):939-52.

19 Inglis AF Jr. Cidofovir and the black box warning. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 2005;114(11):834-5. 20 Dubey S, Powell CA. Update in lung cancer 2007. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2008;177(9):941-6. 21 Seaberg RM, Eski S, Freeman JL. Influence of previous radiation exposure on pathologic features and clinical outcome in patients with thyroid cancer. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2009;135(4):355-9. 22. Smith EM, Pignatari SS, Gray SD, Haugen TH, Turek LP. Human papillomavirus infection in papillomas and nondiseased respiratory sites of patients with recurrent respiratory papillomatosis using the polymerase chain reaction. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1993;119(5):554-7. 23 Lott DG, Krakovitz PR. Squamous cell carcinoma associated with intralesional injection of cidofovir for recurrent respiratory papillomatosis. Laryngoscope 2009;119(3):567-70. 24 Donne AJ, Rothera MP, Homer JJ. Scientific and clinical aspects of the use of cidofovir in recurrent respiratory papillomatosis. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2008;72(7):939-44. 25. Albright JT, Pransky SM. Update on the use of cidofovir for managing recurrent respiratory papillomatosis. ENT News (Mar/Apr) 2003;12(1);71-3. 26. Muñoz N, Kjaer SK, Sigurdsson K, Iversen OE, Hernandez-Avila M, Wheeler CM, Perez G, Brown DR, Koutsky LA, Tay EH, Garcia PJ, Ault KA, Garland SM, Leodolter S, Olsson SE, Tang GW, Ferris DG, Paavonen J, Steben M, Bosch FX, Dillner J, Huh WK, Joura EA, Kurman RJ, Majewski S, Myers ER, Villa LL, Taddeo FJ, Roberts C, Tadesse A, Bryan JT, Lupinacci LC, Giacoletti KE, Sings HL, James MK, Hesley TM, Barr E, Haupt RM. Impact of human papillomavirus (HPV)-6/11/16/18 vaccine on all HPV-associated genital diseases in young women. J Natl Cancer Inst 2010;102(5):325-39. 27. World Health Organization, Human Papillomavirus (HPV) [www.who.int/nuvi/hpv/en/index.html]

ENT & audiology news | www.entandaudiologynews.com

The Rehabilitation of the Deaf Child Konstance Tzifa, MPhil, FRCS(ORL-HNS), DLO, Consultant ENT Surgeon, Birmingham Children’s Hospital, Birmingham, UK.

R

ehabilitation usually refers to restoration of a skill that is lost. In paediatric deafness the ability to hear may have not been there in the first place, therefore the term ‘habilitation’ is more appropriate because the skill needs to be taught. ‘Aural

habilitation’ for children with congenital or acquired deafness depends on many factors relevant to the onset and type of deafness, and also on the mode of communication.

Kate Hanvey, Specialist Speech and Language Therapist, The Midlands Hearing Implant Programme – Children’s Service, Birmingham Children's Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK. Correspondence E: Konstance.tzifa@ bch.nhs.uk E: Kate.hanvey@ bch.nhs.uk Declaration of Competing Interests None declared.

The importance of a critical learning period for language development is well accepted. This learning must occur very early in life to avoid greater social, educational and psychological disadvantages. Delays in diagnosis of deafness can be detrimental for the child’s language development. Therefore, the focus for clinicians is early diagnosis and intervention. For most children with normal hearing, listening and spoken language develops in line with other developmental milestones. This is not the case for most children who have a severe to profound hearing loss. Where listening skills are impaired, the development of spoken language becomes a challenge. Communication through visual language is limited by the skills of the parents and primary carers. Therefore the following are essential. 1. Early identification of hearing impairment in infants and children 2. Determine aetiology and progression of hearing loss 3. Provision of amplification, sound philosophy 4. Early educational options Infants can be fitted with hearing aids as soon as the hearing loss is confirmed, even prior to age three months. Binaural amplification and education facilitates the acquisition of speech and language by the child with profound hearing loss.1 The use of binaural hearing aids for amplification in children is well accepted.2 Monitoring of the child wearing hearing aids and hearing aid assessment is essential because changes in hearing performance are commonly seen in children using hearing aids. There are many causes for changes in hearing performance including malfunctioning hearing aids, additional acquired cause of hearing loss and progression of the existing hearing loss. For children with profound hearing loss, where hearing aids offer little or no benefit, a cochlear implant is the device of choice. Cochlear implant candidates should receive them as early in life as possible. In the UK, most

centres aim for around 10 to 12 months of age. Since the first two implantations by Graeme Clarke3 and his group at the University of Melbourne in Australia, experience of cochlear implantation and rehabilitation for children has increased and proved cochlear implantation to be a remarkable achievement in habilitation of deafness and speech and language development. How the brain learns to interpret signals from the cochlear implant as meaningful is an amazing process. Hearing aids amplify sound to the cochlea. Cochlear implants replace the cochlea function through electrical stimulation of the hearing nerve. Hearing aids rely on existing hair cells. Implants restore the sensation of hearing, whereas hearing aids exploit existing hearing. Fitting of optimal amplification is just the beginning of the parental journey in helping their hearing impaired child develop competent and effective communication. The task that is faced by parents cannot be underestimated. To illustrate this, in a recent presentation, Carol Flexer4 shared some startling research conducted with normally hearing children. By the age of four years, children in ‘professional’ families have heard 46 million words spoken whereas children from ‘welfare’ families have heard 13 million words. This puts children from welfare families at such a disadvantage, the gap cannot be closed.5 For a congenitally profoundly deaf child awaiting cochlear implant fitting, a conservative assumption is that they will have already lost 12 months of listening experience and once fitted, their hearing is not comparable to their normal-hearing peers. Yet with carefully structured guidance and support, it is possible for some hearing impaired individuals to close the gap. One may assume that if optimal amplification is fitted ‘early enough’, then therapy and / or early educational intervention may not be required. However the following issues remain:6

ENT & audiology news | www.entandaudiologynews.com

25

feature

1. Reduced ‘listening time’ during the day during times when amplification cannot be worn (for example sleeping, bathing and so on), by comparison with 24/7 listening in normal hearing 2. Reduced opportunities for incidental learning through overhearing (90% of learning and knowledge in children is incidental), due to background noise and distance listening 3. Learning to listen begins after a period of sensory deprivation and therefore the early building blocks of communicative interactions that come through hearing, have not been established. Of course, all children and their families are different. There are several factors that affect outcomes of cochlear implantation and also play an important role in rehabilitation and education. A significant proportion of children who are born with a profound hearing loss will have additional needs.7 These sometimes impede learning and are often related to the primary aetiology. Awareness of the cause of deafness and any additional impairment is important for counselling as this may impact on the communication options chosen by parents or recommended by professionals. There may be individual family circumstances that make it difficult to access or take on board the support offered. In particular, in the early stages following diagnosis, parents may need time to grieve, to adjust and consider the options on behalf of their child. Therefore there is no unique intervention option that suits all, circumstances change over time and children and their families require a highly individualised programme which has been tailored to their needs.8 Ninety to 95% of children with hearing impairment are born into families where both parents have normal hearing.9,10 Many parents from this group would like their children to learn to listen and talk as their primary means of communication, to attend a mainstream school and to have the same opportunities available to them as their normal-hearing peers. Although not without its challenges, this is now a realistic desire for many, particularly for children who do not have significant additional needs above and beyond their hearing impairment. Auditory-Verbal Therapy and / or Auditory-Oral programmes can support parents who have chosen this route. It should be noted that these approaches are not the same, and sources of further information can be found at the end of this article. A high quality service should 26

provide support to parents and families to guide, coach, engage and empower them with confidence, skill and knowledge to develop their child’s auditory brain for listening and talking. Total Communication is a philosophy that includes a wide range of communication strategies using hearing, vision and touch. It appears to be most commonly interpreted to mean that individuals are using some sign language in addition to spoken language. Unfortunately, the result can be an impoverished rather than enhanced communicative exchange whereby the child does not receive a good language model in either modality.11 However a total communication approach does have a place. Some parents find it particularly useful to help establish basic meaningful communication in the absence of appropriate amplification (for example whilst waiting for a cochlear implant in toddlers) and some also like to use a total communication approach as a way of keeping options open. In addition, some children require a degree of sign language to augment their spoken communication and for these individuals sign support may be required throughout their educational career. Choosing a total communication route as a long-term option implies that all family members and other key carers will learn to sign to a competent level in order to provide enriched models of language. Sign Bilingualism aims to develop competent and age appropriate language using a formal sign language system (such as British Sign Language). Functional understanding and use of written and spoken language is also encouraged. Within the UK, Sign Bilingual programmes are usually delivered in some Special Schools for the Deaf and are therefore not usually available until a child is of Nursery age (around three or four years old). Parents who have little or no experience of deafness and sign language should be encouraged to think about the long-term implications of choosing this option for their child, as it is absolutely essential that all family members and other significant carers become fluent in the Sign Language used in the school. Learning sign language to a fluent level requires significant financial investment and takes several years. Without this, their children may become isolated from the rest of the family and may grow up being unable to communicate effectively within the family unit. Regardless of the amplification device and communication modality, the aim of an early intervention programme should be to prevent significant language delay and

educational underachievement, and habilitate through a normal developmental sequence, rather than to rehabilitate disordered communication that has developed over time as a consequence of hearing loss. Not all roads lead to the same destination. Choices made when the child is 12 months old may not fit with the parents’ long-term hopes, dreams and wishes for their child. Parents should therefore be encouraged to obtain information from a range of sources in order to come to an informed decision about the choices they make on behalf of their child. !

Further information National Deaf Children’s Society, Communicating with your deaf child [http://www.ndcs.org.uk/family_support/ communication_m/communicating_with_your_ deaf_child/] Carol Flexer homepage [http://www.carolflexer.com/] Auditory Verbal Lounge [http://auditoryverballounge.co.uk/] Auditory Verbal [http://www.auditoryverbal.org.uk/] Deaf Education Through Listening and Talking [http://www.deafeducation.org.uk/]

References 1. McConnel F, Liff S. Symposium on sensorineural hearing loss in children: early detection and intervention. The rationale for early identification and intervention. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 1975;8(1):77-87. 2. Downs MP. Amplification in the habilitation of the young deaf child. In Early management of hearing loss. Edited by Mencher GT, Gerber SE. New York, NY: Grune & Stratton; 1981;199-224. 3. Clark G, Tong Y, Black R, Foster I, Patrick J, Dewhurst D. Multiple electrode cochlear implant. J Laryngol Otol 1983;91:41-4. 4. Flexer C. Cochlear implantation and neuroplasticity: linking auditory exposure and practice. Presented at the British Cochlear Implant Group annual conference, Nottingham, UK; 2011. 5. Hart B, Risley TR. The social world of children: learning to talk. Baltimore: Brookes Publishing Company; 1999. 6. Tyszkiewicz E, Stokes J. Paediatric habilitation. In Cochlear Implants A Practical Guide, Second edition. Cooper HR, Craddock LC. London: Whurr Publishers; 2006. 7. Condon M-C. Unique challenges, children with multiple handicaps. In Pediatric Amplification, Omaha. Edited by Feigin JA, Stemachowicz PG. Boys Town National Research Hospital; 1991. 8. Wyatt JR, Niparko JK. Evaluation of the benefit of the multichannel cochlear implant in children in relation to its cost. In: Cochlear Implant Rehabilitation in Children and Adults. Edited by Allum DJ. San Diego, CA: Singular: 1996;20-30. 9. Mitchell RE, Karchmer MA. Chasing the mythical ten percent: Parental hearing status of deaf and hard of hearing students in the United States. Sign Language Studies 2004;4(2):138-63. 10. NDCS factsheet. Statistics on childhood deafness in the UK; 2003. 11. Wilcox S. American deaf culture. Silver Spring, MD: Linstok Press; 1989.

ENT & audiology news | www.entandaudiologynews.com

Serious Complications of Acute Otitis Media: mastoiditis and intracranial sepsis Mr William PL Hellier, MBChB, FRCS(ORL-HNS), Consultant ENT Surgeon. Correspondence Department of ENT, Southampton University Hospital and Royal Hampshire County Hospital, Hampshire, SO16 6YD, UK. E: [email protected] Declaration of Competing Interests None declared.

A

cute Otitis media (AOM) is one of the most common diseases diagnosed in the paediatric population. Rates of AOM vary between countries, but approximately 30-60% of children will have an episode in their first year of

life, and up to 70-80% by the time they are three years old. The greatest risk of AOM occurs in the second six months of life.1 In the USA it is the most common indication

for antibiotic therapy.

Mastoiditis Most cases of AOM will involve infection of both the middle ear cleft and mastoid air cells with purulent exudate. However in certain serious episodes, possibly due either to mastoid obstruction because of mucosal oedema leading to mucopus under pressure, or possible bacterial virulence, bacteria may penetrate the middle ear or mastoid mucosa. This leads to an infective osteitis or acute mastoiditis, often with involvement of the periosteum either by direct spread or via venous channels. If the infiltrative and destructive infective process continues, progression to coalescent mastoiditis may occur with breakdown of the normal mastoid architecture, associated, or followed by spread beyond the mastoid either intra or extra cranially. Serious complications of AOM are unusual but are of great interest to the otolaryngologist, as they will need management under the care of the ENT surgeon.

Serious complications are classically divided into extracranial / intratemporal complications and Intracranial complications. These are detailed in Table 1. Mastoiditis is the most common of the serious complications of AOM. The classic presentation is that of a child with a history of AOM who develops a reddened, tender posterior auricular sulcus often with a degree of effacement, and protrusion of the auricle. This occurs due to the underlying osteitis and periosteitis. If left untreated this will progress and pus will collect under the periosteum forming a subperiosteal abcess or infection may spread further, potentially intracranially. There have been a number of studies that have examined the incidence of mastoiditis in different populations. In Norway the incidence from 1999-2005 of mastoiditis was found to be 4.3-7.1 / 100,000 in the two to 16 year old age group, but 13.5-16.8 in the under two year old population.2 In the UK a

Table 1. Complications of Acute Otitis Media Intratemporal Complications

Acute Mastoiditis Facial paralysis Labyrinthitis

The significance of mastoiditis is that it is the ‘staging post’ to intracranial complications

Sensorineural hearing loss Petrositis / Gradenigo’s Syndrome Extratemporal Complications

Subperiosteal mastoid abscess Bezold’s abscess

Intracranial Complication

Extradural abscess Subdural abscess Cerebral / cerebellar abscess Sigmoid sinus thrombosis Otitic hydrocephalus Meningitis

ENT & audiology news | www.entandaudiologynews.com

27

feature

Figure1: Mastoiditis. CT scan showing opacification of the right middle ear and mastoid, post-auricular swelling with abscess formation.

recent study has estimated the incidence as 0.15 / 1,000 child-years.3 Other studies have quoted incidences of between 1.1 and 12 / 100,000. Most have found higher rates in the under two years of age group.4 This is unsurprising as this group is when this incidence of AOM is at its greatest. Certainly this reflects the experience from my own unit where the vast majority of AOM complications have been in this age group. The incidence of mastoiditis after AOM has also been studied and, in the UK this was found to be approximately 2.4 cases of mastoiditis per 10,000 cases of AOM (0.024%), but this was higher in children not treated with antibiotics (0.038%).3 Historically Rudberg in 19545 reported mastoiditis occurring in 17 % of cases of AOM. Palva in 1959 described the incidence of mastoiditis after AOM in Finland as 0.3%.6 Palva reported again in 19857 showing an incidence of mastoiditis of 4 / 100,000, which he described as a marked reduction, and which he attributed to the increased use of antibiotics. However there may have been other factors such as a change in living standards over this time, which may have also influenced the rate of AOM. There has been some debate over the recent years whether there has been an increase in the incidence of mastoiditis, as there has been a growing trend for not prescribing antibiotics for AOM. Van Buchem in 1985 published a paper in the BMJ examining this subject,8 finding only a small effect of antibiotic use on the rate of mastoidtitis. However children under two were excluded from the study, and this is the most common age group to suffer from complications of AOM. Other recent studies have shown a reduced incidence of mastoiditis in countries where antibiotic prescribing is higher (rates in Holland where antibiotic use is low are 3.8 / 100,000, and 1.2-2.0 / 100,000 in 28

countries with high rates of prescribing).9 There have been a number of papers that have suggested no change in mastoiditis rates (including a recent publication from the UK comparing 1991-1998 and 19902006),3 but a few suggesting a rise in cases over the last few years.10,11 The picture is therefore a little mixed. This issue is further confused however when one examines the literature, as in most series approximately 4060% of children admitted with a complication of AOM had already been started on antibiotics by their primary care physician for the preceding AOM. Although 50% of children have had no prior treatment, it would seem a high proportion of cases of complications have occurred despite oral antibiotic therapy. This could be related to the virulence of the bacteria involved, the incorrect antibiotic or poor patient compliance.

Bacteriology Reviews of the bacteriology of mastoiditis show that in a high proportion of cases, 40-50%, no growth will be found on microbiological swab analysis.4,12-14 This is possibly due to the previous administration of antibiotics. Of those cases with positive microbiology, in most series Streptococcus pneumoniae is the most frequent bacteria isolated. Strep. pyogenes, Staphylococcus aureus and Haemophilus influenzae are the next most common, with Pseudomonas aeruginosa and a mixture of anaerobes and other bacteria found infrequently. Antibiotic therapy for mastoiditis or a complication of AOM must therefore be targeted at these organisms.

Intracranial complications The most concerning sequelae of AOM are undoubtedly those of intracranial septic complications, where there may be high morbidity and potentially mortality. The significance of mastoiditis is that this is the ‘staging post’ to intracranial complications. In all series intracranial sepsis occurs in nearly all cases as a combination with or after mastoiditis (the only exception is meningitis which may occur without signs of mastoiditis). This is the reason mastoiditis must be treated seriously and with urgency. Intracranial complications occur due to direct spread of infection from the mastoid ostetitis, but also via a septic thrombophlebitis of the local venous system or mastoid emissary veins. Inflammation of the neighbouring middle or posterior fossa dura may occur with localised abscess formation. Thrombophlebitis from the inflamed dura may lead to intracerebral or intracerebellar abscess collections. The walls of the sigmoid

sinus are formed by dural folds, infection or inflammation of which leads to localised mural thrombus formation that may progressively reduce or totally obstruct venous flow. Propagation of this sigmoid sinus thrombus (SST) may extend into the internal jugular vein, the transverse sinus, or other venous sinuses. This thrombus may become infected leading to frank pus, or cause the obstruction of the cerebral venous drainage system leading to hydrocephalus (otitic hydrocephalus). In the preantibiotic era the mortality of sigmoid sinus thrombosis and intracranial abscess was almost 100%, however in modern times this mortality has fallen sharply but death still occurs. The incidence of intracranial complications after mastoiditis varies between modern series but is in the order of 4-20%.12,13 There seems to be reasonably even distribution between extra and intradural abscesses and infective SST. However there may well be a combination of these complications.

Management The management of a child with mastoiditis has changed over the years. In the preantibiotic era surgery was the mainstay of treatment with mastoidectomy with myringotomy. In the antibiotic era there has been a marked change in management. A number of recent series have shown that the percentage of children with mastoiditis who need to undergo mastoidectomy has fallen to 1634.5%.15 The majority of children with mastoiditis, especially if early in its course, will resolve with intravenous antibiotics +/myringotomy. Some studies16,17 have shown that myringotomy does not always need to be performed but should be considered if the tympanic membrane is still intact to allow middle ear drainage, and also to collect microbiological samples. If a subperiosteal mastoid abscess is present at admission or develops subsequently, this will need drainage.15 Usually this will be performed by formal surgical incision, but some series have described management with simple needle aspiration in addition to myringotomy and antibiotics.17,18 Careful observation of a child with mastoiditis is needed because if the condition does not improve or deteriorates, further intervention with cortical mastoidectomy may be needed. This will probably be required if the child has developed an intracranial or severe extracranial complication. However there are a number of children where the decision to perform a mastoidectomy is more finely balanced. If there is a subperiosteal abscess, the child is systemically

ENT & audiology news | www.entandaudiologynews.com

feature

Figure 2: Sigmoid Sinus Thrombosis. Axial CT scan with contrast showing enhancement of the right sigmoid sinus walls due to inflammation with no luminal flow due to thrombus. This is often called the Delta Sign.

Figure 3: Cerebellar Abscess. Axial MRI scan showing opacification of the left middle ear and mastoid with a large cerebellar abscess.

Figure 4: Sigmoid Sinus thrombosis. MRA showing no flow in the left sigmoid sinus (arrow).

unwell or there is failure of resolution over 2448 hours, many otologists would argue that cortical mastoidectomy, with drainage of the abscess, should be carried out. However some series have managed such patients conservatively, and in the modern day era of subspecialisation not all otolaryngologists may be entirely comfortable exploring the mastoid of a 14 month old child. There have been a number of studies that have looked at features of mastoiditis that may predict for the need for mastoidectomy (high white cell count and CRP seem to be predictive), but none have shown any absolute indications, and there still remains a degree of clinical judgement. There is also no information that suggests whether a complete cortical mastoidectomy or a purely drainage procedure is most appropriate. Some children with AOM and mastoiditis will have established intracranial sepsis when they present to secondary care, others will develop this during the course of their disease. The classic symptoms of intracranial complications are an unwell child, with high fever (with spiking pyrexias, the so called ‘picket fence’ chart), often drowsy or lethargic and possibly with neurological signs. Children presenting in this way, or whose mastoiditis is not resolving need radiological investigation to assess the temporal bone and intracranial compartment. In the era of broad spectrum antibiotics, it must be remembered that not all children with an intracranial complication will present with classic signs however, and a high index of suspicion, and a low threshold for radiological investigations is important. CT scanning with contrast will give good bony information, and can show intracranial sepsis. MRI scanning gives far more brain and dural detail and will show peri-dural

infection, cerebritis or cerebral abscess. Adding MRA gives more information about the sigmoid sinus,19,20 especially showing thrombus formation or cerebral sinus occlusion (Figures 2, 3, 4). Treatment of the intracranial complication will depend upon its nature but may need involvement of the neurosurgeons or paediatric neurologists. Extradural abscesses may be drained by complete cortical mastoidectomy with drilling down of the posterior or middle fossa plate to expose the extradural pus and exteriorise this into the cortical cavity. Subdural abscesses may be drained in a similar way but with needle aspiration through the exposed dura in combination with the neurosurgeons. Intracerebral or cerebellar abscesses are often drained by the neurosurgery team via a separate burr hole. A common finding in these cases is generalised dural inflammation with granulation tissue. All intracranial complication will need a prolonged course of intravenous antibiotics. Sigmoid sinus thrombosis (SST) presents a condition which is not usually managed by the neurosurgeons, as it is more often seen in children with clotting derangements and presents usually to the paediatric neurologists where it is managed medically, typically with anticoagulation. The treatment of SST secondary to AOM is different however and has slowly changed over the years. In the pre- and early antibiotic era thrombus extension and septic emboli were not uncommon, and internal jugular vein ligation (IJVL) with sigmoid venotomy, thrombus removal and packing were performed regularly. More modern series have shown that IJVL is now rarely needed, and surgical treatment has become more conservative, although there is still discussion over the optimum

management.19-24 Cortical mastoidectomy can be indicated and it is important to fully expose the sigmoid sinus walls and some of the posterior fossa dura. This allows drainage of any perisinus collections or granulation tissue.21 Many papers have suggested that placing a needle into the sinus gives information about whether there is any blood flow, but this may be unnecessary as MRA now gives excellent preoperative information regarding blood flow and sinus patency. A number of series have indicated that in the presence of thrombus, the sinus should be opened and a thrombectomy performed.22-24 Recent studies however have shown that this may not be needed, and if the thrombus is noninfected, the sinus can be left intact and recannalisation may occur in a number of cases.19-21 If there is infection of the intrasinus thrombus then the sinus must be opened and the pus drained. My own experience from a number of cases of SST is that with thrombus alone the dural walls of the sigmoid sinus were thickened with granulations and could be left in situ, but in three of the cases where the thrombus had become infected the dural walls had already thinned and the area of the sinus was filled with purulent material and gas which was easily opened and drained. If a SST has occurred there is debate in the literature whether anti-coagulation is needed.20,21,24 A number of earlier case series routinely anticoagulated such children. However there have been reports of haemorrhagic complications,25 and recently there have been a number of series where anticoagulation has not been instituted, without any progression of the thrombus or septic emboli. 20-22 The need for anticoagulation needs consideration and

ENT & audiology news | www.entandaudiologynews.com

29

feature

discussion with the paediatric neurology team, but the indication is certainly not absolute. !

References 1. Teele DW, Klein JO, Rosner B. Epidemiology of otitis media during the first seven years of life in children in greater Boston: A prospective, cohort study. J Infect Disease 1989;160(1):83-94. 2. Kvaerner KJ, Bentdal Y, Karevold G. Acute mastoiditis in Norway: No evidence for an increase. Int J Paed Otorhinolaryngol 2007;71(10):1579-83. 3. Thompson PL, Gilbert RE, Long PF, Saxena S, Sharland M, Wong ICK. Effect of antibiotics for acute otitis media on mastoiditis in children: A retrospective cohort study using the United Kingdom genral practice research database. Pediatrics 2009;123(2):424-30.

9. Van Zuijlen DA, Schilder AGM, Van Balen FAM, Hoes AW. National differences in incidence of acute mastoiditis: relationship to prescribing patterns of antibiotics for acute otitis media? Pediatr Infect Dis J 2001;20(2):140-4. 10. Finnbogadottir AJ, Petersen H, Laxdal P, Gudbrandsson F, Gudnason P, Haraldsson A. An increasing incidence of mastoiditis in children in Iceland. Scand J Infect Dis 2009;41(2):95-8. 11. Benito MB, Gorricho BP. Acute mastoiditis: Increase in the incidence and complications. Int J Paed Otorhinolaryngol 2007;71(7):1007-11. 12. Dhooge IJM, Albers FWJ, Van Cauwenberge PB. Intratemporal and intracranial complications of acute suppurative otitis media in children: renewed interest. Int J Paed Otorhinolaryngol 1999;49 Suppl 1:S109-14.

17. Taylor MF, Berkowitz RG. Indications for mastoidectomy in acute mastoiditis in children. Ann Otol, Rhinol, Laryngol 2004;113(1):69-72. 18. Lahav J, Handzel O, Yehuda MP. Postauricular needle aspiration of subperiosteal abscess in acute mastoiditis. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 2005;114(4):323-7. 19. Bales BB, Sobol S, Wetmore R, Elden LM. Lateral sinus thrombosis as a complication of otitis media: 10-year experience at the children’s hospital of Philadelphia. Paediatrics 2009;123(2):709-13. 20. Chistensen N, Wayman J, Spencer J. Lateral sinus thrombosis: A review of seven cases and proposal of a management algorithm. Int J Paed Otorhinolaryngol 2009;73(4):581-4. 21. Wong I, Kozak FK, Poskitt K, Ludemann JP, Harriman M. Pediatric lateral sinus thrombosis: Retrospective case series and literature review. J Otolaryngol 2005;34(2):79-85.

4. Leskinen K, Jero J. Complications of acute otits media in children in southern Finland. Int J Paediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2004;68(3):317-24.

13. Luntz M, Brodsky A, Nusem S, Kronenberg J Luntz M, Brodsky A, Nusem S, Kronenberg J, Keren G, Migirov L, Cohen D, Zohar S, Shapira A, Ophir D, Fishman G, Rosen G, Kisilevsky V, Magamse I, Zaaroura S, Joachims HZ, Goldenberg D. Acute mastoiditis – the antibiotic era: a multicenter study. Int J Paed Otorhinolaryngol 2001;57(1):1-9.

5. Rudberg RD. Acute otitis media: comparative therapeutic results of sulphonamide and penicillin administered in various forms. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl 1954;113:1-79.

14. Quesnel S, Mguyen M, Pierrot S, Contencin P, Manach Y, Couloinger V. Acute mastoiditis in children: a retrospective study of 188 patients. Int J Paed Otorhinolaryngol 2010;74(12):1388-92.

23. Manolidis S, Kutz JW Jr. Diagnosis and management of lateral sinus thrombosis. Otol Neurotol 2005;26(5):1045-51.

6. Palva T, Pulkkinen K. Mastoiditis. J Laryngol Otol 1959;73:573-88.

15. Tamir S, Shwartz Y, Peleg U, Shaul C, Perez R, Sichel JY. Shifting trends: mastoiditis from a surgical to a medical disease. Am J Otolaryngol 2010;31(6):467-71.

24. Bradley DT, Hashisaki GT, Mason JC. Otogenic sigmoid sinus thrombosis: What is the role of anticoagulation? Laryngoscope 2002;112(10):1726-9.

16. Geva A, Oestreicher-Kedem Y, Fishman G, Landsberg R, DeRowe A. Conservative management of acute mastoiditis in children. Int J Paed Otorhinolaryngol 2008;72(5):629-34.

25. Shah UK, Jubelirer TF, Fish JD, Elden LM. A caution regarding the use of low-molecular weight heparin in pediatric otogenic lateral sinus thrombosis. Int J Paed Otorhinolaryngol 2007;71(2):347-51.

7. Palva T, Virtanen J, Makinen J. Acute and latent mastoiditis in children. J Laryngol Otol 1985;99(2):127-36. 8. Van Buchem FL, Peeters MF, Van ‘t Hof MA. Acute otitis media: a new treatment strategy. BMJ 1985;290(6474):1033-7.

22. Lee HL, Choi JC, Park K, Choung Y. Managements for lateral sinus thrombosis: does it need ligation of internal jugular vein or anticoagulants? Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2009;266(1):51-8.

www.entandaudiologynews.com Why not list your event in our online diary?

It’s free Click and complete the simple interactive PDF form. It couldn’t be easier!

30

ENT & audiology news | www.entandaudiologynews.com

Reassembling the Auditory World in Children with Cochlear Implants Blake C Papsin, MD.

I

t has been over twenty years since cochlear implants (CI) were first approved for use in children with sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) and at the Hospital for Sick Children in Toronto, we recently implanted our 1,000th CI. While our under-

standing of CI in children has evolved dramatically, we still cannot fully predict or explain their benefits and limitations for any one child. Clearly there are many research

questions left to answer. Improved surgical techniques have minimised complications, Sharon L Cushing, MD.

allowing us to reduce the age of implantation and CI is now routinely performed bilaterally on infants with safe, reliable and incredibly sophisticated devices.1 Likewise criteria for implantation have evolved and we now provide CI to individuals not originally considered to be candidates. Implanted children are developing linguistic skills on par with their peers, albeit with the aid of significant intervention from auditory verbal therapists. The outcome is magnificent when we measure speech perception in quiet or even with controlled background noise. By contrast, important questions regarding auditory plasticity and how children with early onset SNHL function in the real world

Karen A Gordon, PhD. Correspondence Blake C Papsin, MD, Department of Otolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery, Hospital for Sick Children, 555 University Avenue, Elm Wing 6103-C, Toronto, ON, Canada, M5G 1X8. E: blake.papsin@ utoronto.ca Declaration of Competing Interests None declared.

remain. Whilst we were once thrilled with any improvements in hearing following CI, our present objectives are no less than to restore ‘normal’ auditory function. This brief communication will not act as a review of the current literature, but rather takes advantage of this rare opportunity to speculate on what we think is fundamental to CI outcomes in children based on questions we are presently asking in our laboratories.

The auditory system, stimulated by either normal hearing or auditory prostheses, does not act in isolation. There is ample evidence that the auditory pathways can be modulated by other sensory and arousal mechanisms.2 As humans, we need to take in multiple, diverse inputs, focus on those which are important at that time, and decide how to integrate and respond to this information. The perception of the signal is as important as the context in which it resides. For example, a siren in most cases elicits a basic instinct to run for the exits. However, when a siren is heard in Bob Dylan’s Rainy Day Women No. 12 & 35 (which opens his 1966 album Blonde on Blonde), our reaction is completely different. Clearly the context in which sound is presented is key to understanding this input and deciding how to react to it. In the lab, we start to see the limitation of CI when we ask recipients to reassemble auditory information by judging the emotion in a spoken sentence. We found that these children are less accurate and

Figure 1: Plain radiograph demonstrating bilateral cochlear implants with the electrode array within the cochlea (white arrowhead).

respond more slowly than their normal hearing peers when doing this task.3 Increased reaction times strongly suggest that additional processing time is required to reconstruct the auditory environment and react to it. Along the same line, we have been studying musical perception in children with CI and have found that their ability lags far behind their normal hearing

ENT & audiology news | www.entandaudiologynews.com

31

feature

The human brain rapidly assembles and processes multi-sensory information for both survival and enjoyment. Assembly of the auditory environment in children with significant hearing loss is best achieved by early cochlear implantation, ideally performed bilaterally, to encourage auditory development which is as close to normal as possible

Figure 2: Histologic section of the cochlea with cochlear implant electrode array in situ in the basal turn (white arrow). Photo courtesy of Cochlear Limited.

peers. These deficits reflect the poor temporal information provided by the CI.4 Despite these limitations, however, children with CI are still able to distinguish between happy and sad music and that they love to listen to music.3 Again, we see that they compensate for limited input and enjoy using what they have.

Measuring progress It is important to note that our ‘standard’ battery of speech perception tests provides a narrow view of auditory perception. Such measures do not elucidate how children use their CI in daily life as they develop socially, scholastically, preparing for employment and 32

adulthood, nor the complex neural network involved in hearing. Although the fundaments of auditory perception can be examined in the laboratory by asking listeners to identify the properties of simple sounds, more complex and ‘real world’ auditory processing is often left unexamined. The use of complex stimuli and listening tasks can help define the limits of hearing in children using CI and allow us to study how these children might compensate to meet these listening challenges. It follows then that the real test of CI effectiveness should be how well the sensory input it provides steers the contextual reassembly of the auditory environment.

It is reasonable to assume that hearing is compromised when auditory input is limited or degraded. Yet, the auditory pathways appear remarkably adept at using whatever information it receives. To our initial surprise, even children with significant anatomic malformations of the cochleae perceive reasonably well in test environments.5 This speaks to the complexity and redundancy that must exist in the auditory system which, when fully functional, is able to perceive subtle cues in speech such as innuendo and sarcasm. Efforts to 1) increase the amount of information made available to the auditory system, 2) improve the ability to extract information from the

ENT & audiology news | www.entandaudiologynews.com

feature

environment and / or 3) promotes normal development of the auditory system, would enhance the ability to reconstruct the auditory environment for CI users. These three principles should provide the motivation for improved implant technology and novel methods to test CI outcomes in the future.

Reorganisation of the hearing network Is it naïve to think that one or even two CIs could provide sufficient information for children to reassemble the auditory environment and make important decisions about how to interact or react? To answer this, we need to understand how the underlying mechanisms of auditory perception develop. It is clear that the normal interplay between different brain areas is altered in congenital deafness, resulting in abnormal reorganisation.6 Although we would like the early restoration of audition through CI to eliminate any changes away from normal, we realise that reorganisation likely begins with the onset of deafness and is already underway even when we provide CIs in early infancy.7 Given that the CI cannot fully mimic the normal hearing ear, we do not know whether CI use can halt or reverse the effects of deafness in early development. It is important to remember that the CI may not be treating the same deafness or the same effects of deafness in all children. We have recently shown a high degree of heterogeniety in cortical responses in children at initial CI use. Interestingly, responses look more uniform in children with biallelic GJB-2 mutations. 8 This suggests that the etiology of the hearing loss may define the state of the auditory pathways at the time of CI and perhaps even predict how the auditory system will respond to CI stimulation. This issue could become more important as more discrete and focused stimulation of the auditory nerve is provided through advances in technologies.

Binaural input In addition to the possible limitations of CI stimulation on auditory development, we must acknowledge the implications of unilateral auditory deprivation through the provision of a single sided CI. We are finding that the auditory cortex becomes reorganised after long periods of unilateral CI use (no contralateral hearing aid). This reorganisation persists even when a second CI is provided and the bilateral

implants are used for three to four years.9 Our recent data shows that the auditory brainstem is able to detect interaural level and timing cues after sequential bilateral implantation (long inter-implant delay), but that binaural input is not normally processed in the cortex. Perhaps this is why these children are unable to perceive changes in interaural timing cues in a behavioural lateralisation task.10 Even with these abnormalities, we see that bilateral implantation has been beneficial, providing an improvement in spatial hearing for sound localisation and detecting speech in noise.11 Although these skills are far from normal in this group, the benefits attest to the remarkable ability of the child to integrate and use whatever information is available to make sense of the world around them.

Auditory support of non-auditory tasks The auditory environment is often used to support non-auditory tasks. Normal binaural auditory processing allows us to construct a spatial organisation of sounds in our environment and directs our visual attention to the sound source. These instinctive reactions allow us to navigate safely through traffic or locate a friend in a crowd and it is these fundamental hearing skills which we should strive to restore for children with SNHL and CI. Up until recently, most individuals received a single CI which precludes binaural processing, challenging sound localisation. The advent of bilateral, and particularly simultaneous bilateral CI, allows us to re-approximate, at a minimum, the physiology of binaural sound input with the aim of restoring binaural processing and localisation and our ongoing studies suggest that we are making progress. Another example of how auditory information supports non-auditory tasks, is the statistically significant improvement in balance function (on the BruininksOseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency 2 balance subset) observed when the CI is used during the balance task.12 These data provide a strong case for improved balance function using the reconstructed auditory environment as an additional source of sensory input.

Conclusion and future directions Of late, our thinking is less about the implant and more about plasticity, and current efforts are focused on improving the child’s ability to correctly reassemble all the inputs that contribute to their

ENT & audiology news | www.entandaudiologynews.com

auditory environment. Can implant recipients detect emotion in music and speech? Can they understand sarcasm? Can they perceive innuendo? These critical aspects of the auditory environment allow the listener more than just survival; they comprise the ‘fine points’ of listening and allow maximal enjoyment of the auditory world. Can the implant recipient reassemble the auditory environment accurately and quickly enough to allow the full use of short-term memory and how does that affect the ability to learn? Should different strategies be employed in educating children with CI? The technology, though magnificent, has been reasonably static and the real gains in our opinion have been in understanding how the human uses this limited information so completely in an attempt to accurately reassemble the auditory world that surrounds them. !

References 1. James AL, Papsin BC. Cochlear implant surgery at 12 months of age or younger. Laryngoscope 2004;114(12):2191-5. 2. Shimojo S, Shams L. Sensory modalities are not separate modalities: plasticity and interactions. Curr Opin Neurobiol 2001;11(4):505-9. 3. Hopyan T, Gordon KA, Papsin BC. Identifying emotions in music through electrical hearing in deaf children using cochlear implants. Cochlear Implant Int 2011;12(1):21-6. 4. Rubinstein JT. How cochlear implants encode speech. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2004;12(5):444-8. 5. Papsin BC. Cochlear implantation in children with anomalous cochleovestibular anatomy. Laryngoscope 2005;115(1 Pt 2 Suppl 106):1-26. 6. Rapin I. Consequences of congenital hearing loss – a longterm view. J Otolaryngol 1978;7(6):473-83. 7. Gordon KA, Valero J, Jewell SF, Ahn J, Papsin BC. Auditory development in the absence of hearing in infancy. Neuroreport 2010;21(3):163-7. 8. Gordon KA, Tanaka S, Wong DD, Stockley T, Ramsden JD, Brown T, Jewell S, Papsin BC. Multiple effects of childhood deafness on cortical activity in children receiving bilateral cochlear implants simultaneously. Clin Neurophysiol 2011;122(4):823-33. 9. Wong D, Gordon KA. Hemispheric Lateralization of Evoked Potentials in Bilaterally Implanted Cochlear Implant Users. In: 32nd Annual Midwinter Meeting of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology. Baltimore, MA; 2009. 10. Salloum CA, Valero J, Wong DD, Papsin BC, van Hoesel R, Gordon KA. Lateralization of interimplant timing and level differences in children who use bilateral cochlear implants. Ear Hear 2010;31(4):441-56. 11. Litovsky RY, Johnstone PM, Godar S, Agrawal S, Parkinson A, Peters R, Lake J. Bilateral cochlear implants in children: localization acuity measured with minimum audible angle. Ear Hear 2006;27(1):43-59. 12. Cushing SL, Chia R, James AL, Papsin BC, Gordon KA. A test of static and dynamic balance function in children with cochlear implants: the vestibular olympics. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2008;134(1):34-8.

33

The Future of Paediatric ENT Surgery Gavin Morrison, MA, FRCS, Consultant Paediatric Otolaryngologist. Correspondence Evelina Children’s Hospital, Guy’s & St Thomas’s NHS Foundation Trust, London, SE1 7EH, UK. E: gajm@ gavinmorrison.com Declaration of Competing Interests None declared.

increasing numbers of young children requiring surgery are being transferred to regional tertiary centres for both emergency and elective surgery, without this transfer being planned, managed or resourced 34

I

wish to discuss the future provision of ENT services within the UK. To determine where we are going, it should be helpful to look at where we have come from and at recent trends. Many factors will influence how paediatric ENT

services are delivered across the UK. These include changes in medical education and surgical training, a reduction in experience resultant from years of compliance to the European Working Time Directive (EWTD), healthcare politics, driven by central government, and perhaps most importantly, what is happening to the allied specialties with whom we work so closely. Specifically, we will be driven by the changes we have seen in anaesthetic practice, over the past decade or more.

Look back in anger

The way we live now

Since 1948, the NHS has tried to address healthcare inequalities. The model of our NHS ‘free at the point of delivery’ but centrally funded out of taxation and thus politically directed makes it vulnerable to the constant shifting of party politics. During my training and consultant years, I have witnessed endless initiatives, frameworks, plans and guidelines for the provision of health delivery and medical education. The 1983 ‘Griffiths Report’, the 1991 The Patients’ Charter and ‘Designed to Care’ – the White Paper of 1997 all had their merits. Through The NHS Plan (2000) we witnessed competition and the internal marketplace, fundholder GPs came and went, yet the Wanless Report of 2002 further increased the power and influence of primary care. More personally we have all been influenced by Action on ENT, MMC, The New Consultant Contract, PMETB, PBR, Patient Choice / Choose and Book, NICE and more. The current political will is going to see GP consortia handling ‘real’ budgets to buy care (from ‘any willing provider’) on behalf of their local communities; the abolition of all primary care trusts and of strategic health authorities, and the creation of a new NHS Commissioning Board. A similar American Model showed mixed success over a 20 year period and only a small proportion of these groups have survived.1 We are about to boldly go where no man has gone before with the ‘starship’ of the Health and Social Care Bill to guide us.2

Are we in a position to influence the future of Children’s ENT healthcare? We should be, as only the paediatric ENT surgical body itself has the understanding and experience to see what is really needed, and what is practicable. Above all, the need should be patient focused. The 1989 NCEPOD Report3 highlighted that surgeons and anaesthetists should not undertake occasional paediatric practice. The concept of a ‘minimum case load’ was introduced, as was the increasing centralisation of paediatric services. In 1989, over 80% of consultant anaesthetists had anaesthetised one or more infants of less than six months of age, within that year. Nine years later, that number had fallen to 40%. Evidence from Hospital Episode Statistical data (HES) confirms the perception that children’s surgery has shifted from District General Hospitals to specialist centres. In 2005, The Royal College of Surgeons Children’s Surgical Forum reported on trends in children’s surgery, in England.4 Marker operations for the study included grommets, tonsillectomy and adenoidectomy. Over the 10 year period from 1994 to 2004, the percentage of procedures undertaken in DGHs dropped from almost 80% to just over 60%, with the specialist centres showing the inverse of these percentages. The evidence is strong that there has been a significant shift in children’s ENT surgery from DGHs into specialist centres, and a reduction in overall number of procedures. Trends in general

ENT & audiology news | www.entandaudiologynews.com

feature paediatric surgery will also influence paediatric ENT. In 2006, a joint statement on general paediatric surgery provision in DGHs was made on behalf of the relevant colleges.5 It confirmed that increasing numbers of young children requiring surgery are being transferred to regional tertiary centres for both emergency and elective surgery, without this transfer being planned, managed or resourced. A future was foreseen in which almost all children under five years and most under eight, presenting with paediatric surgical emergencies, would be transferred from a DGH to a specialist centre for treatment. The development of paediatric surgical regional networks between groups of hospitals was envisaged. A three centre model for paediatric surgery, comprising small DGHs, intermediate centres which were large DGHs and some university hospitals, and thirdly, specialist or tertiary centres was proposed. This same model could be applied with benefit to paediatric ENT services. A recent review of children’s surgery6 highlighted minimum ages for emergency or urgent surgery to be under five or even under eight years of age. If these ages applied to paediatric ENT surgery many children would be disadvantaged as they could not receive ENT procedures locally and the specialist centres do not have sufficient resources to treat more three to eight year olds. Let us now consider how anaesthetic services are being driven in the UK. The Royal College of Anaesthetists (RCoA) in their publication ‘Raising the Standard: a Compendium of Audit Recipes’7 confirmed that avoidable deaths were identified in the under-10 age group. They proposed that a target for best practice should be that a consultant anaesthetist or equivalent be expected to hold core competencies in the management of simple elective procedures in fit children who are ASA 1 or 2 down to at least five years of age. The more up to date RCoA publication of April 2010, ‘Guidance on the Provision of Paediatric Anaesthesia Services’,8 broadly suggests that children with significant acute or chronic medical problems, those undergoing more complex procedures, neonates and small infants should be referred to specialist units or tertiary paediatric centres. Nevertheless, DGHs should have arrangements for treating simple surgical emergencies and should be able to resuscitate and stabilise seriously ill children of all ages, prior to their transfer. All consultant anaesthetists with a CCT or equivalent should be competent to provide care for common

Table 1: ASA Physical Health Classification •

ASA 1 is a normal healthy patient in all respects



ASA 2 has no functional limitations, but may have a well controlled disease in one body system, or mild obesity. These are the patients who can be treated in the DGH setting with an age limit to be agreed



ASA 3 patients have some functional limitation and controlled disease in more than one body system or in one major system



ASA 4 has poorly controlled severe disease with possible risk of death



ASA 5 is not expected to survive 24 hours without surgery and has imminent risk of death or multi-organ failure



ASA 6 is declared brain dead for organ donorship

surgical conditions, both elective and emergency, for children aged three years and older. Day care surgery was considered appropriate for children for non-complex surgery in the healthy child with no comorbidities. In 2008, when President of BAPO, Peter Robb discussed and reported on the provision of ENT services highlighting that ENT training differs from general surgical training.9 Paediatric subspecialist work is embedded into both the syllabus and the final intercollegiate examination in ENT. Thus our consultants across the UK have experience and the expertise to manage younger children. In December 2010 The RCS of England published a survey10 in which of 305 DGHs, less than half were actually able to provide an emergency paediatric surgical service. Many of the Trusts faced problems sustaining anaesthetic services for children and 33% of hospitals were unable to anaesthetise children under the age of three. The London Specialised Children’s Services Review, commissioned by the NHS11 is suggesting organisation and coordination of currently fragmented services across London, where 28 hospitals provide children’s services, yet the number treated per annum ranged from 14 to 2,795! The key recommendations for change are to

ENT & audiology news | www.entandaudiologynews.com

focus a wide range of specialised children’s services in fewer hospitals, and to establish networks that co-ordinate specialised services in a defined area. The 8,000,000 population would support only two networks. Similarly, the ongoing ‘Safe and Sustainable NHS Review’ is dictating on the future of children’s congenital heart services and neurosurgery, in England.12 The result will be fewer tertiary specialised services, each with the potential for the best of outcomes.

Back to the future I believe that the same principles currently being applied in other paediatric surgical specialties will, and should be, taken up by paediatric otolaryngology. The model of regional networks is essential but will in fact be driven by changes in anaesthetic practice. We are a strong sub-specialty group with the highest levels of training. Both our current close attention to agreed guidelines for Tonsillitis and OME, and our representation of the specialty at the international paediatric ENT meetings demonstrates that we have much to be proud of. Nevertheless, co-ordinated and resourced planning should enhance our delivery of safe care. I envisage a model in which paediatric ENT care continues to be delivered across the range of NHS settings. Primary care and community based ENT delivery could have an important place for certain outpatient services. Secondary care provision in hospitals should continue to provide the majority of routine paediatric ENT surgery in the over three year olds if possible. However, the routine paediatric ENT procedures will probably only be undertaken in secondary care DGHs where the children are ASA 1 or 2 and over the agreed age. If the anaesthetists’ current training guidelines are adopted, then children from three years and over should be accepted. If the trends in general paediatric surgery wield undue influence, then the cut-off age could become five (or even eight). This would disadvantage many; children would have to travel great distances for their ENT surgery and a much greater increase in the resources at the bigger centres would be required. The model of smaller (intermediate secondary care) and larger DGHs or university hospitals, networking together, is the right one. Those larger centres perhaps with maternity services and higher dependency critical care, will certainly be able to routinely undertake the slightly more complex and younger child. The tertiary centres will inevitably continue to receive more and more of the specialist problems, 35

feature

the paediatric ENT emergencies and small children. Thus any young child with a potentially life threatening airway problem, and indeed many of the more complicated septic conditions such as neck abscesses, mastoiditis and complicated sinusitis, will not meet the criteria of being ASA 1 or 2, and all those under three will need to be retrieved or transferred to the tertiary centres. The ASA (American Society of Anaesthesiologists) classification system,13 together with a younger age cut off point, does provide a simple and practical means of determining healthcare policy. All children considered ASA 3 or above are likely to require transfer to tertiary or specialist centres. I envisage that we need in the region of a dozen tertiary centres across the UK. Currently, we have at least nine very strong providers of tertiary paediatric ENT care. The few major centres that are weaker should be actively developed with new recruitment and funding. These tertiary centres should all undertake the full range of paediatric ENT surgery and are also largely well positioned to encompass paediatric cochlear implantation. A smaller subset of these regional tertiary units, which might be termed quaternary, should provide for paediatric oncology, neurosurgery and the most demanding of the airway problems such as complex low tracheal work and other rarer congenital disease. I believe this model would be successful, but there are numerous problems, including training issues, ENT on-call rotas and who should undertake the paediatric ENT surgery in the DGH setting. To achieve a critical load, the ENT surgeon should perform an operating list at least once a fortnight and ideally, weekly. The other non-paediatric ENT operators should not undertake occasional surgery on children, but the whole department will need to be updated in emergency stabilisation and resuscitation of paediatric life-threatening complications, for on-call to be manageable. CME and revalidation could valuably include mandatory annual update training in these areas, run by the regional tertiary centres. Within the expanded tertiary centres, the emergency workload will be much greater than our current representation of 30%. To accommodate this really requires a significant expansion in consultants and facilities and would allow the emergence of stand alone paediatric ENT on call rotas. Training of all ENT surgeons in the UK already robustly includes paediatric otolaryngology. It 36

could be enhanced if all trainees are obliged to spend six months in a tertiary unit and if post-CCT fellowships were to be undertaken by all who intend to undertake DGH paediatric ENT surgery as the local lead clinician. There is a need for organised planning of these resources. If the principles of the pathways for care are agreed, then appropriate central funding of highly specialised services, together with the primary care commissioners, should allow a successful and financially viable integrated networked service. The difference between ‘high volume, low tariff’, ENT procedures and ‘low volume, high tariff ones’, needs to be recognised and the tariffs adjusted to ensure the viability of hospital services. The specialist tertiary centres will be undertaking remarkably little in the way of routine care and the low volume airway cases as well as emergency care in the under threes will need to attract much larger tariffs or the units will become unsustainable. I personally believe that there is no place for paediatric ENT services in the treatment centres (CATS/ICATS/SPMS). To meet the exacting criteria of the healthcare commission and to have facilities for safe resuscitation and emergency management and transfer, would be very costly. Current tariffs make it non-viable and would see both educational and financial destabilisation of NHS secondary care. Similarly the private sector is unlikely to wish to compete for NHS surgery on cost. The trends we have seen for a reduction in the overall numbers of tonsils and grommet surgery, across the UK, will almost inevitably continue because of financial impecunity. Whilst academic debate may still rage about the value of these operations, the prospect for the next two public spending reviews looks tight for the NHS up to perhaps 2017, and increased healthcare rationing in some form seems inevitable. This future as I have envisaged it is realistic. It would provide a structure for a safe and enhanced delivery of care to children across the whole spectrum of ENT conditions. It would allow for closely controlled audit, but has not addressed the need for paediatric ENT research in the UK. Currently, no structure exists for the choice to become a primary researcher in paediatric ENT as a career. I would love to see a future in which this deficit is addressed. That would truly enhance paediatric ENT care into the far future – the final frontier. !

References 1. O’Dowd A. GP consortiums will need first class management support. BMJ 2011;342:d337 2. Health & Social Care Bill, 2010-2011 [http://www.dh.gov.uk/en/Publicationsandstatistics /Legislation/Actsandbills/index.htm] 3. National confidential enquiry into patient outcome and death, 1989. [http://www.ncepod.org.uk/1989.htm] 4. Trends in Children’s Surgery 1994-2005: Evidence From Hospital Episode Statistics Data. [http://www.bipsolutions.com/docstore/pdf/ 16070.pdf] 5. Joint statement on General Paediatric Surgery on behalf of the Association of Paediatric Anaesthetists, the Association of Surgeons of GB and Ireland, the British Association of Paediatric Surgeons, the Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health and the Senate of Surgery for GB and Ireland, 2006. [http://www.rcseng.ac.uk/service_delivery/ children2019s-surgical-forum/ the-csf-e-newsletters/documents/ Aug%2006%20Joint%20statement%20GPS.pdf] 6. Pye JK. Survey of General Paediatric Surgery Provision in England, Wales and Northern Ireland, on behalf of the Association of Surgeons of Great Britain and Ireland. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2008;90(3):193-7. 7. ‘Raising the Standard: a Compendium of Audit Recipes’ The Royal College of Anaesthetists [http://www.rcoa.ac.uk/index.asp?PageID=125] 8. Guidance on the Provision of Paediatric Anaesthesia Services, The Royal College of Anaesthetists 2010 [http://www.rcoa.ac.uk/docs/GPAS-Paeds.pdf] 9. Robb,P. Provision of Children’s ENT Services, 2008 [http://www.rcseng.ac.uk/service_delivery/ children2019s-surgical-forum/ the-csf-e-newsletters/documents/PJR%20Newsletter %20Childrens%20ENT%20March%2008.pdf] 10. Royal College of Surgeons of England, General paediatric surgery service provision Survey summary, 2010 [http://www.rcseng.ac.uk/publications/docs/ general-paediatric-surgery-service-provision-survey] 11. The London Specialised Children’s Services Review, 2011 NHS Commissioned. [http://www.londonhp.nhs.uk/ wp-content/uploads/2011/03/ FINAL-London-specialised-childrens-services -review-summary-guidance.pdf] 12. National Paediatric Surgery Reviews: Safe and Sustainable 2011 [http://www.specialisedservices.nhs.uk/ safeandsustainable] 13. American Society of Anaesthesiologists Physical Status Classification System [http://www.asahq.org/For-Members/ Clinical-Information/ASA-PhysicalStatus-Classification-System.aspx]

ENT & audiology news | www.entandaudiologynews.com

audiology matters

Paediatric Audiology Guest edited by Josephine Marriage

Post Newborn Hearing Screening ABR: quality assurance and the role of peer review Helping Families Accept Technology Auditory Verbal Therapy Provision in the UK Unilateral Hearing Loss in Early Childhood: what are we doing about it? Amplification Options for Mild Bilateral Hearing Loss & Unilateral Hearing Loss in Children: a literature overview Paediatric Tool Development: developing a rationale for empowering children with hearing loss

In this issue...

Paediatric Audiology Josephine Marriage, PhD, UCL Ear Institute, 332 Grays Inn Road, London, WC1X 8EE, UK. E: [email protected]

I

am delighted to have been asked to edit this section on Paediatric Audiology for ENT & audiology news. The implementation of newborn hearing screening programmes (NHSP) around the world has reduced the age of diagnosis of hearing loss for children and improved potential outcomes for speech and language for these children. The fact that the UK was the first country to introduce universal coverage of newborn screening is testament to the innovative nature of its audiology base, but paediatric audiology is now at a cross roads in the UK. Screening is only the first step of the complex process of defining extent and type of hearing loss and expanding family choices for intervention. Guy Lightfoot gives a candid reflection of the pitfalls and challenges of evaluating hearing levels on which options for hearing aid amplification are based and the need for continuous training and peer-review to develop clinical skills in recording and interpreting ABR traces. While nationally-based policies and regulation are possible within an integrated healthcare system, the lessons for constantly evolving effective practice are equally important for all those engaged in assessing ABRs in infants. The benefits offered by early hearing aid fitting to provide neural stimulation from the first months of life need to be matched by exposure to meaningful, socially-relevant auditory communication. The use of hearing aids in infancy relies primarily on parents, who may be struggling to consolidate the life changes inherent with the arrival of a new baby with the devastating identification of hearing loss. Jane Madell has outlined her excellent thoughts on helping to support the use of technology by parents and other family members at this crucial time. As non-verbal responses of an infant with hearing loss are not the same as those of a typically hearing infant there is a need to support the auditory-based communication dynamic. It is an equally critical component in realising the benefits of early identification of hearing loss. Without this support David Luterman’s comment that “Screening efforts have far out stripped our habilitation efforts, leaving parents with diagnosis but without support” has a ring of truth. Parents are entitled to consider all options in finding a technique or strategy that addresses their own goals and wishes for their child. If the onus of responsibility for use of amplification is conferred on the parents, they are equally central to communication choices. Elizabeth Tyszkiewicz provides an overview of the Auditory Verbal Therapy (AVT) approach which, although widely available in other countries with early screening programmes, until recently has only been available through non-government providers in the UK. The adoption of AVT at Manchester and Birmingham Cochlear implant programmes marks an important stage in expanding choices for auditory-oral communication in the UK. One of the incidental challenges that has materialised from NHSP is the identification of unilateral hearing loss, a proportion 38

of which will develop into bilateral hearing loss. Here, Priya Singh provides an up-to-date and comprehensive review of the known impact of unilateral hearing loss (UHL) in childhood, reviewing the impact of UHL on susceptibility to speech delay, educational underachievement and social disadvantage. This perspective is far removed from the traditional advice proffered that ‘one ear is enough’. Cherilee Rutherford then goes on to describe the developing range of amplification technologies appropriate for children with UHL emphasising that careful assessment and management consideration for each individual case is required in the same way as for bilateral hearing loss. It is intriguing to note that this collection of articles has been provided by seven people who were trained at universities in four of the five continents of the world. A global resource now exists for paediatric audiology, a necessary requirement if the challenges and complexities in this specialised area of audiology are to be faced head-on. Amplification and implantable devices are more complex, and both the human interface between technology and fundamental communication needs and the range of assessment techniques available requires constant up-skilling and new patterns of training. It is deeply unsettling therefore to report that the training of graduate audiologists in the UK is regressing back to a diagnostic science curriculum, to be combined with vision and diagnostic neurosciences delivered by means of a three-year training, in-service programme. The current economic climate and Government cuts have reduced resources within the NHS UK healthcare system, the universities and social support for deaf people to the point that recent advances in hearing healthcare are in real peril. The apparent solution to these challenges – a fundamental regression of audiology primarily to that of a diagnostic healthcare science – will not only cost more to deliver but (in terms of the actual spend required to produce graduates) it will likely generate a large pool of poorly-trained healthcare workers, possessing only low-level, generic qualifications and little currency within the international team of paediatric audiology professionals. Audiologists are autonomous practitioners for long-term management of hearing and balance impairments. These needs are not, and never will be, met solely by the fitting of a hearing aid, as will become apparent to the increasing proportion of the population with hearing loss. There is no possibility that generically-trained ‘neurosensory’ diagnosticians will work in vision science one week, diagnostic neuroscience the next and audiology the following week, and still be able to fulfil the needs of infant, teenage, adult and elderly hearing impaired people. As with many politicallycontrived schemes, this programme for the modernisation of scientific careers will be soon be found to be unfit for purpose but, for the coming decade of children born with hearing loss and their families, the future looks opaque indeed. !

ENT & audiology news | www.entandaudiologynews.com

Post Newborn Hearing Screening ABR: quality assurance and the role of peer review Guy Lightfoot

T

Graham Sutton Sally Wood Correspondence English Newborn Hearing Screening Programme Clinical Group E: [email protected] Declaration of Competing Interests GL has acted as an expert witness for the plaintiff in legal cases involving misdiagnosis associated with poor ABR practice. In all cases to date, the defendant has settled out of court.

he English Newborn Hearing Screening Programme (NHSP) began in 2001 and implementation was completed across England in March 2006. The NHSP Programme Centre then embarked upon a Quality Assurance programme to assess performance against the agreed Quality Standards.1 The Quality Assurance programme encompassed early audiological assessment, habilitation and early intervention as well as screening activity. This QA process began to identify problems with the quality of ABR assessment; some audiology departments’ standards of performing and interpreting ABR tests were so poor that there were serious risks of misdiagnosis. Indeed in some cases the ABR service had to be suspended and was only reinstated when further training, supervision and ongoing quality assurance had been implemented. These errors are usually an example of unconscious incompetence – people thinking that they know what they are doing, when they do not. This tends to arise when staff do not understand the underlying concepts of the task (were

never properly trained), do not update their knowledge (CPD), or do not invite external scrutiny of their work (peer review). This is often linked to managerial pressure on staff to accept new responsibilities without the necessary specialist training or support. Another contributory factor can be how often tests are performed. Too small a catchment population and / or too great a number of staff doing the work may result in an individual performing tests too infrequently to develop or maintain the required degree of competence. To address this urgent training need a series of ABR refresher days was initiated to disseminate the important principles needed to ensure good ABR practice, together with individual training visits and mentoring of some departments. These refresher days continue and are a good means for testers to check their understanding of the latest guidance and to benchmark their own standards. Figures 1 and 2 give a ‘before and after’ example of ABR waveforms from one department that had a ‘serious incident’

for a peer review system to work effectively

Figure 1

practitioners must feel confident and comfortable in submitting their own results for review

Figure 2

ENT & audiology news | www.entandaudiologynews.com

39

feature

One important weakness of any regional peer review group is that it can be only as good as its best contributor and subsequently had NHSP specialist training and mentoring. Both cases were discharged but the child shown in Figure 1 was actually profoundly deaf. Aficionados of ABR will be able to identify the specific errors made in this example. Such cases are rare but do continue to occur. Figure 2 is an example of the same department’s current work, with unequivocal 4kHz clear responses down to discharge level. Like many other departments, this centre also routinely tests at 1kHz although this exceeds the NHSP requirement for discharge. It helps keep skills sharp for those cases that require multifrequency assessment prior to amplification. NHSP guidance for conducting and interpreting ABR tests has been updated2,3 based on certain important requirements designed to minimise the scope for serious misdiagnosis. One significant development included in these recent documents is the move away from clicks toward 4kHz tone pips as the primary stimulus upon which discharge is based. This was a move that NHSP resisted for some time because frequency-specific ABR responses are smaller than click responses and this presents a more challenging task, with greater scope for interpretive error. We did not want to compound existing errors of procedure and interpretation by making the task more difficult. However, this change has now been introduced because the skills of the majority of ABR staff have improved to the required level. An ABR discussion forum was added to the NHSP web site so that interesting and difficult cases could be submitted, ideas shared and expert opinion given.

So what about peer review? A pilot scheme in which all ABR test results were reviewed at a regional (Strategic Health Authority) level has been undertaken, after first training local ABR staff to review tests to standards described in current NHSP guidance. An infrastructure including the anonymous distribution of tests to reviewers and central support with a team of national ‘expert’ reviewers was necessary. This approach did demonstrably improve practice but was clearly too expensive and unwieldy to roll out as a national model. The feedback provided by the reviewers to testers was constrained by 40

the reviewing spreadsheet used and was sometimes perceived as stark, impersonal and negative with therefore limited effectiveness in terms of a catalyst for change. A full report on this pilot is in preparation. More attractive and manageable is the establishment of regional peer review groups. Some areas have successfully used a regional peer review model for some time. There are a number of models that could be used, ranging from the independent review of every case by local peers, to the occasional group meeting over coffee to discuss ‘difficult cases’. The former is labour intensive and in practice simply doesn’t happen; the latter is probably not very effective in raising and maintaining standards. In our opinion for a peer review system to work effectively practitioners must feel confident and comfortable in submitting their own results for review. There must be systematic selection of cases for review otherwise there is a risk that only the best results will be submitted for review. There needs to be a systematic approach to the review (we have a new spreadsheet that can be used to structure the review) and individuals must be prepared to openly critique the work of other (sometimes more senior) clinicians, and we sometimes observe an understandable reluctance to do this. Other features of a peer review model include: ● rotation of reviewers with sufficient cover for holiday and sickness ● a quick (typically 48-72 hours) review turnaround time for specific cases to allow the feedback to be used in the management of that case ● use of a standard review format plus phone discussions between reviewer and tester when helpful ● regular meetings between reviewers to check and benchmark their own practice ● access to NHSP experts for disagreements, queries and periodic moderation ● annual report to include an audit and review of arrangements and results of an external moderation One important weakness of any regional peer review group is that it can be only as good as its best contributor and errors could continue to occur if poor methods or standards are considered acceptable by all participants. For this reason, all peer

review groups should have both an initial training element and periodic independent external moderation. We would also like to strongly suggest there needs to be a system of formal assessment and accreditation of competence of individuals before they start routinely performing newborn ABRs. This is equally important for those performing VRA and other behavioural tests on young children. We hope that the professional bodies, DH and HEIs will move rapidly towards such a scheme. Getting the right balance between conflicting practical and technical requirements is difficult. NHSP are currently helping establish a number of regional peer review groups and will continue to learn what works and what doesn’t.

Closing remarks To use a motoring analogy, the UK still has an ‘MOT’ test to check that cars are roadworthy. Many countries have abandoned this idea, arguing that it is actually more cost effective to allow accidents to happen than to pay for the infrastructure around the MOT. In pure financial terms that is probably correct. That is also what most countries have, by default, with their current postscreening ABR test services: no systematic check of performance, with occasional misdiagnoses leading to substantial financial settlements. NHSP believe that our profession can and should do better than that; we also think it is important to consider the cost to the child of a missed opportunity to optimally develop language. QA and peer review may be somewhat inconvenient and have financial implications but they are the right thing to do. This is what marks us out as professionals. !

References 1. NHSP Quality Standards. Newborn Hearing Screening Programme (England) [http://hearing.screening.nhs.uk/standardsandprotocols] 2. Guidance for Auditory Brainstem Response testing in babies. Version 1.1 April 2010. Newborn Hearing Screening Programme (England) [http://hearing.screening.nhs.uk/ audiologicalassessment] 3. Guidelines for the early audiological assessment and management of babies referred from the newborn hearing screening programme. Version 2.5 March 2011 Newborn Hearing Screening Programme (England) [http://hearing.screening.nhs.uk/ audiologicalassessment]

ENT & audiology news | www.entandaudiologynews.com

Helping Families Accept Technology Jane R Madell, PhD, CCC A/SLP, ABA, LSLS Cert AVT, Director, Paediatric Audiology Consulting, Correspondence 450 West 23rd Street New York, NY 10011 E: Jane@ JaneMadell.com

W

ith the technology that is currently available, almost every child should be able to hear sufficiently to use audition to develop listening and spoken language. However, children will only be able to use audition to develop

spoken language if they wear the technology which means that parents have to under-

stand and accept the need for full time use of technology. Why then, do parents have difficulty accepting technology?

Declaration of Competing Interests None declared.

It is not really about the technology. Today’s parents are comfortable with technology – they use cell phones, computers and so on. But hearing aids are different. Accepting hearing aids means accepting the hearing loss. To succeed in getting kids to use hearing aids full time, families must accept the hearing loss. For each family, we need to know what is interfering with the family accepting the hearing loss. Why can some families move ahead through their sadness and fit hearing aids and start therapy, while other families seem paralysed and cannot move ahead. While there is a little time to spare, we need to get hearing aids on relatively quickly to help children become auditory learners and develop an auditory brain.

Our ability to assist parents in accepting hearing loss is closely tied to how we, as clinicians, feel about hearing loss. Although I feel sad for the family when I diagnose a hearing loss, I am very optimistic about what is possible for a child identified with hearing loss in 2011. I know technology available today will enable virtually every child to hear and learn, especially when paired with auditory based early intervention services. Part of counselling families is passing on optimism about the future of children with hearing loss. If we are not optimistic, we do families a disservice. The first reason is, because we will not provide them with the hope to move on. Secondly, we may not push as hard as we might to be sure

ENT & audiology news | www.entandaudiologynews.com

41

feature

Children will only be able to use audition to develop spoken language if they wear the technology which means that parents have to buy into the need for full time use of technology

kids are hearing as well as they can, accepting ‘good enough’ in place of ‘excellent’. We can become more optimistic by getting to know families who have kids who are successful, by talking to and listening to kids who have had the advantage of current technology, by meeting today’s young adults, who did not have the advantage of current technology, and are still successful. The more optimistic we are, the more optimistic we can help families become.

therapists in understanding performance and planning remediation.

Keeping the technology on the head

Parents need to believe that technology will help Parents need to understand that the ears are the pathway to the brain, and that audition is critical for auditory brain development which results in both spoken language and academic learning. They need to understand that children learn language by overhearing. Unless they are hearing soft speech all day long, they are going to miss out on incidental learning. They need to know that auditory access leads to reading. Parents are anxious that their children should be able to fulfill their potential and be successful. Helping them understand the relationship between hearing, language, reading and learning is critical in helping them understand the importance of wearing technology on a full time basis.1

The technology needs to be working optimally The most encouraging thing for a parent is seeing the child respond to sound. On the other hand, if a child does not seem to be responding, it is difficult for parents to fight with children to keep the equipment on. When a parent first sees a child alert, turn to sound, or search for a sound, they feel hopeful – “maybe this will be okay,” and they can work on being sure the technology is kept on. How do we know if technology is working optimally? It is not guesswork. We need to test. With tiny ones, we start off with an ABR, but we need to move to behavioural testing quickly. ABR cannot 42

be used to monitor hearing aid performance but behavioural testing can. Behavioural observation audiometry (BOA) can be used to test infants under six months of age,2,3 VRA and Conditioned Play can be used for older children. Obtaining aided thresholds and detection levels for the Ling sounds with hearing aids will let us, and parents, know if the hearing aid is providing sufficient gain throughout the frequency range. Moeller et al. (2010)4 have reported that 40% of children are not receiving sufficient gain from their hearing aids. Real Ear testing tells us what is reaching the ear drum, but not what is reaching the auditory brain. While Real Ear testing is critical, it is not sufficient. Aided thresholds can be accurately obtained by starting below threshold and presenting short duration warble tones or noise bands. This should not set off compression and should provide reliable results. If the child is not hearing softly enough, hearing aid settings can be adjusted to provide sufficient hearing to receive all auditory information. Once a child is old enough, speech perception testing should be added to the test protocol at normal and soft conversational levels in quiet and in competing noise.5 This information is useful both for parents and for

Parents sometimes have difficulty keeping technology on. It is important to know why in order to make the appropriate suggestions. Children sense their parent’s discomfort and may remove hearing aids for that reason. Parents need to understand that they must give a very clear message to their children indicating that the hearing aids may not be removed. If the child takes it off, it has to go right back on. Children should be using the hearing aids full time after two weeks. Parents need to understand that it will be a difficult two weeks but once accomplished, the child is on his / her way. Keeping the child entertained helps. Children are less likely to take technology off while they are being read to and more likely to remove it when alone in the back seat of the car (FM can help in that situation). A bonnet covering the ears and tied under the chin will help in keeping hearing aids on during the early weeks. Being optimistic about what is possible for children with hearing loss, will help parents be optimistic. Our job is to keep them from giving up. !

References 1. Robertson L. Literacy and Deafness: Listening and Spoken Language. Plural Publishing; San Diego: 2009. 2. Madell JR. Using Behavioral Observation Audiometry to Evaluate Hearing in Infants from Birth to 6 Months. In Pediatric Audiology: Diagnosis, Technology, and Management. Edited by Madell JR, Flexer C. New York; Thieme: 2008. 3. Madell J. Behavioral evaluation of hearing in babies: Yes, you can! AudiologyOnline Recorded Course 12919, eLearning library; 2009. [http://www.audiologyonline.com] 4. Moeller PM. Outcomes of children with Hearing Loss. ASHA Conference, Boston; 2010. 5. Madell JR. Evaluation of Speech Perception in Infants and Children. In Pediatric Audiology: Diagnosis, Technology, and Management. Edited by Madell JR, Flexer C. New York; Thieme: 2008.

ENT & audiology news | www.entandaudiologynews.com

Auditory Verbal Therapy Provision in the UK Elizabeth Tyszkiewicz, Auditory Verbal Therapist. Correspondence Children's Service, Midlands Hearing Implant Programme, Optegra Building, Aston University, Birmingham, B4 7ET, UK. E: Elizabeth.Tyszkiewicz @bch.nhs.uk

A

uditory verbal therapy, is “an individual, auditory, developmental programme, implemented by the child’s family in close collaboration with a therapist, with the goal of achieving age appropriate spoken language ability, and full social partici-

pation throughout childhood and beyond.” (AVUK, 2003). It has particularly urgent rele-

vance now, as NHSP and early amplification fitting presents support services with what Carol Flexer, Distinguished Professor Emeritus, University of Akron and Northeast Ohio AuD Consortium (NOAC), calls ‘a new paradigm’: “Rapid infant brain growth requires prompt intervention, typically including amplification

Declaration of Competing Interests None declared.

and a program to promote auditory skill development. In the absence of sound, the brain reorganises itself to receive input from other senses, primarily vision: …this reduces auditory neural capacity.” (Carol Flexer, 2011).

The parent is at the centre of each AVT session (photo by kind permission of Auditory Verbal UK).

AVT is labour intensive, requiring whole-family commitment and active participation

Auditory Verbal Therapy (AVT) practice developed in North America, and is well established in Australia. It increasingly informs mainstream thinking about service provision for children with early-identified hearing impairment in UK and Europe, as well as many other countries around the world. AVTs are licensed practitioners in Audiology, Speech and Language Therapy or Education, who have undergone a three year post-qualification training and mentoring programme. The knowledge base for this programme of study encompasses a range of domains, including parent guidance, education and support, child development, spoken language communication, auditory functioning, hearing and hearing technology, strategies for listening and spoken language development. A key

element of the practice is the provision of regular, individual hour-long parent and child sessions, until the child is shown to have attained age-appropriate spoken language ability, or makes the transition to another, more appropriate programme. The approach is founded on the principle that language is learned by all children from the main carers, usually the parents. The therapist provides an intensive, individual coaching programme, through which they gradually gain confidence and expertise to become the main ‘agent of change’ for the listening and spoken language development of their child with impaired hearing. Families who research options when they find out their child has impaired hearing often identify AVT as relevant to them, but have difficulty in finding a suitably qualified

ENT & audiology news | www.entandaudiologynews.com

43

feature

therapist. Until recently, the limited resources available in the UK were all in the independent sector, either as private practitioners, or within voluntary sector organisations. Now, two of the Cochlear Implant programmes in the UK offer follow-up from Certified AVTs – others employ therapists who have an interest, or have undergone training in AVT. There is considerable interest from both specialist educators, and speech language therapy services, as they are increasingly asked to provide for the children identified via the NHSP. However, there is still no therapy offered in NHS departments which fit non-implantable hearing technology, and which cater for the majority of children with permanent hearing impairment in the UK. In Auditory Verbal Therapy, an informed choice to ‘opt in’ is involved, from the family’s and the therapist’s point of view. You don’t find yourself in an AVT programme by default, or by accident. Especially in the early years, AVT is labour intensive, requiring whole-family commitment and active participation. It sets clear short and long-term goals for the child, and constantly generates new diagnostic information which must be incorporated into day to day living. The child’s family must regularly attend AVT sessions, and also, inform and enlist the support of the wider team, working to ensure the child has access to mainstream education. People often imagine there is ‘homework’ for the parents. In fact, it is more a matter of learning to interact with the child at all times in a way that stimulates the development of the ‘auditory brain’ through spoken language embedded in play, problem solving, and the most apparently mundane activities of daily living. It takes far more energy than the already considerable demands of bringing up young children. For the therapist, the programme means hour-long, packed and very detailed sessions, tailored to the learning needs of the specific family and child. Although good therapy is often mistaken by observers for a relaxed and playful time, each session contains careful planning, goal-setting, and targeted activities. Regular individual assessment and reporting are crucial, and there is hands-on coaching for parents throughout the session. The emphasis is strongly on audition, with a consequent need to monitor / maintain technology, feeding back immediately to audiologist or ENT specialist when hearing is not optimal. Each session yields diagnostic information which must be turned into action to be implemented. The therapist must also inform, 44

and enlist the support of the team around each child in the school / local area. At the early stages, the therapist, working against the adults’ natural belief that information must be made visually easy for the child, has to make changes in the learning environment and ‘kickstart’ the neural connections between sound and meaning. It is crucial that the family feels successful, and sees progress as a result of their effort. Sometimes the steps are very small, and the therapist has a crucial role in helping them to observe changes in their child’s learning. All the above are in conflict with trends in public sector service delivery, which are away from individually tailored care, and towards generic ‘advisory’ programmes, or group-based interventions. You cannot ‘grow’ an early developing auditory brain in a group. If true spoken language competence is to emerge, the child needs an optimised version of the opportunities given to the typically hearing newborn: individual, highly audible, and exactly tailored to move the learning on to the next developmental stage. Where there is no hearing difficulty, parents provide all this without a second thought. In the presence of hearing impairment, and using hearing technology, AVTs are there to map the route, support the process, and measure the outcome at regular intervals to ensure learning is on track. Within an NHS service such as the Midlands Hearing Implant Programme Children’s Service in Birmingham, the caseload is extremely diverse, in terms of social circumstances, hearing history, and the presence of complicating factors in addition to hearing impairment. While families make an informed choice to have a cochlear implant for their child, they may not wish, or be able, to opt into an intensive AVT follow-up programme. Other family pressures or social needs may come first, or, indeed, they may have other goals for their child than those defined by AVT, which aims for fluent spoken communication and mainstream schooling. Flexibility and adaptability are also key features of AVT practice in the course of the diagnostic assessment. Hearing impairment doesn’t mean there are no other complications which interfere with learning. It may be necessary for the AVT practitioner to become the ‘hearing adviser’ on a multidisciplinary team which addresses the child’s predominant needs. A great strength of AVT is its rigorous use of ongoing diagnostic observation and formal assessment in the domains of audition, speech, language, cognition and social interaction. There is very little ‘watchful waiting’

in AVT practice. The clear understanding of each child’s latent auditory potential, and of the typical developmental trajectory, leads to active investigation of the reasons why milestones are not reached in a timely fashion. Sadly, there is inequity of access to services, not only because certified therapists are still rare (totalling approximately ten in the UK) but because some people now believe that AVT is ‘only for children with cochlear implants’, as this is the group that most readily gains access to AVT services in the public sector. Ideally all children with impaired hearing would be offered the strong diagnostic benefits of AVT to optimise use of hearing technology, inform management, and identify complicating factors. If paediatric hearing aid departments had a staff AVT, a missing piece of the NHSP puzzle might be slotted into place: intervention would begin on the day of amplification fitting, and dovetail smoothly with follow-up from the local multidisciplinary team. The need for quality intervention to ensure that children with impaired hearing fulfil their true listening and speaking potential has colossal training implications. The ‘paradigm change’ in the last few years means that not enough people know how to harness the tremendous human potential of the next generation of young children with impaired hearing, or what it is reasonable to expect from them and from their families. On the other hand, there is a groundswell of interest and initiative which bodes well for the future: some trainee audiologists receive a grounding in the theory and practice of Auditory Verbal Therapy, special interest groups (SIGs) meet regularly to learn and network, short courses and training days are offered in the public and voluntary sectors, web based resources are easily accessible (see references below), and a Post-Graduate Diploma course is offered at Aston University in Birmingham. ! References Dornan D, Hickson L, Murdoch B, Houston T, Constantinescu G. Is Auditory-Verbal Therapy Effective for Children with Hearing Loss? The Volta Review (Fall) 2010;110(3):361-87. Goldberg DM, Flexer C. Auditory-verbal graduates: outcome survey of clinical efficacy. J Am Acad Audiol 2001;12(8):406-14. Hogan S, Stokes J, White C, Tyszkiewicz E, Woolgar A. An evaluation of Auditory Verbal therapy using the rate of early language development as an outcome measure. Deafness Educ Int 2008;10(3):143-67. Alexander Graham Bell Association for the Deaf and Hard of Hearing [www.agbell.org] Auditory Verbal UK [www.avuk.org] Equal Voice for Deaf Children [www.evdcweb.org]

ENT & audiology news | www.entandaudiologynews.com

Unilateral Hearing Loss in Early Childhood: what are we doing about it? Priya Singh, AuD, Senior Clinical Lecturer, Correspondence UCL Ear Institute, 332 Grays Inn Road, London, WC1X 8EE, UK. E: [email protected] Declaration of Competing Interests None declared.

T

he impact of unilateral hearing loss (UHL) on children was recognised and reported by Bess, Tharpe and colleagues in 1986. Since then, evidence has continued to emerge to change the popularly held misconception that UHL

is a benign condition that requires little more than identification. The introduction of newborn hearing screening programs (NHSP) has allowed cases of UHL to be identified earlier in life than was previously the case. However, there are no recommendations for specified early intervention for these children. Management therefore varies from one centre to the next, from no intervention to amplification with or without support services. The purpose of this review is to remind ourselves of what we know, what we don’t know and to ensure that we make best use of the early identification to start management as soon as possible.

Benefits of binaural hearing Research has enlightened thinking on the benefits of binaural hearing in all listening environments. Studies on binaural listening and amplification have shown favourable effects from binaural summation on speech understanding and ease of listening. Studies on the head shadow effect have demonstrated that children with UHL had poorer speech discrimination scores than normal hearing peers regardless of which ear the signal and noise were directed at (that is, monaural direct or indirect). This has implications for the child in a classroom, or kindergarten, from poor signal to noise ratios, even when the child has preferential seating arrangements. It is known that children with UHL require a higher signal to noise ratio than adults when listening to speech in noise. When assessing the impact of the squelch effect, it is necessary to look specifically at noise effects in children as they are less efficient in suppressing background over the primary signal in order to improve speech perception. When the negative impact of background noise is coupled with reverberation and poor classroom acoustics as is the commonest context for learning speech, language or academic skills, it is clear that there are good theoretical reasons for there being a functional negative impact from UHL in these areas of childhood learning.

Howard et al. (2010) measured listening effort using a dual task paradigm in a typical classroom and found that while children were able to maintain performance on the primary task, the higher listening effort required greater cognitive resources, and that performance decreased on the secondary task. Tharpe’s studies on dual task paradigm (2002) found that even children with normal hearing had difficulties with these tasks.

Impact of UHL on speech and language development, and educational achievement The literature on speech and language development shows mixed outcomes, with some studies reporting delay in speech and language development in children with UHL and others not. A number of studies showing disadvantage experienced by this population are given in Table 1 below. The majority of the studies were on school aged children, and it is important to note that in most it is not known whether the hearing losses were congenital or acquired or whether pre- or postlingually acquired, which may impact on the findings. Further, these early studies were conducted before the introduction of newborn hearing screening, implying later identification rather than late onset of the hearing loss.

children with UHL require a higher signal to noise ratio than adults when listening to speech in noise ENT & audiology news | www.entandaudiologynews.com

45

feature

Table 1. Studies looking at speech and language development in UHL vs normal hearing children. Study and Year

Severity of UHL

Number of subjects

Speech / Language Problems

Klee & Davis-Dansky (1986)

>= 40dB

25

Few differences on 6 standardised language subtests (6-13 years)

Borg et al. (2002)

>= 20dB

58

Delayed language development

Kiese-Himmel (2002)

>= 30dB

31

Normal first words but delayed acquisition of 2-word phrases

Colorado HIP (2002)

Varied

15

Significant or borderline language delay in 33%

Colorado Study II (2003)

30-120dBHL

155

8% received speech and language therapy, and in total 53% had other interventions

Table 2. Impact of UHL on education and academic development. Study and year

Severity of UHL

Number

Educational Findings

Bess and Tharpe (1986)

>= 45dB HL

60

51% satisfactory, 35% repeated a grade, 13% needed assistance

Bovo et al. (1988)

Profound

115

22% failed a grade, 12% needed assistance

Oyler et al. (1988)

>= 25dB HL

54

27% failed a grade, 41% needed assistance

Watier-Launey et al. (1998))

>= 20dBHL

175

40.4% repeated a grade compared to 16% in general population

Hallmo et al. (1986)

>= 20dB HL

56

School results & linguistic development normal (NB: no testable or repeatable measures used, no comparison group)

One of the challenges in evaluating the literature with respect to UHL in children is the lack of a universally accepted definition Table 2 above summarises the findings of studies regarding the impact on educational and academic outcomes for children with UHL. Many of these studies show that a significant proportion of the children with UHL repeated a grade, with an additional number requiring additional educational support. The failure rate at school in the Bess and Tharpe (1986) study found that children with UHL were 10 times greater than the failure rate of the general school population, which was only 3.5%. Waber-Launay et al. (1998) had a larger number of children in their study and had a similar finding, with 40% of the children with UHL failing a grade compared to 16% of the normal hearing population. It is important to note that in the majority of the studies listed in Tables 1 and 2, the findings were similar irrespective of the degree of UHL, thus suggesting that even mild unilateral loss can have a functional impact on achievement and should not be ignored. This may be shown to relate to reduced neural inhibition within the brainstem pathways, thereby changing the input to the ‘normal hearing’ ear, in future physiological research. 46

Behaviour at school and quality of life considerations In addition to educational achievement, behaviour at school is another factor for children with UHL. Brookhauser (1991), in a five year study of 391 children with UHL, found that 59% had academic and behavioural problems. Behavioural issues in school were also noted by Bess and Tharpe (1984) and Stein (1983) who reported that 24% of the group of 19 had behavioural problems in spite of adequate grades. These issues could be related to frustration and fatigue created by the concentration level necessary for UHL children in poor listening conditions, resulting in a lack of co-operation and perceived inattention at school. If we are to be truly comprehensive in the assessment and management of children with UHL, then their mental well-being must also be considered. Studies on children with bilateral hearing loss demonstrated lower scores on tests which assess quality of life (QoL) than normal hearing individuals. The negative emotional and social impact of UHL in adults has been documented. At present there is limited data available regarding the QoL in children with UHL,

which requires further investigation and consideration.

Co-exisiting intrinsic and extrinsic factors UHL has not been fully explored with respect to other co-existing factors like cognitive deficits, developmental disabilities, and demographic factors such as socioeconomic status, level of language stimulation at home, child care quality and common childhood diseases like otitis media with effusion (OME). This co-existence may create a negative synergy, and these children are at greater risk for speech and language delays during the critical period of development, which then impacts on educational progress.

Challenges in evaluating the evidence base One of the challenges in evaluating the literature with respect to UHL in children is the lack of a universally accepted definition. Bess et al. (1998) provided a definition which was adopted by the CDC in 2005 but there are a number of other definitions used in research for example Niskar et al.

ENT & audiology news | www.entandaudiologynews.com

feature

(1998) and BAAP (2009). These differences probably contribute to the high variability in the prevalence figures for children with UHL (Ross et al., 2010). From an estimation of 1 to 3 per 1,000 newborns and 1 to 5% of school aged children having UHL, Davis (2005) reports a prevalence of 0.7/1,000 identified with UHL in the NHSP. It must be noted however that there is the possibility of underestimation of true prevalence figures not solely due to definitions, but also the types of losses included in these figures, poor follow-up rates, acquired aetiologies and newborn screening programs not being specifically designed to identify UHL. It is important to recognise the importance of new skills in applying appropriate masking in follow-up testing with both objective and behavioural testing. In addition, late identification has led to causes of the hearing loss not being fully investigated, thus making it difficult to know whether the losses are congenital or acquired and, more importantly, which losses are likely to deteriorate or progress to bilateral hearing loss.

Clinical strategy for children with UHL With newborn hearing screening programmes (NHSP) identifying UHL in early life and in greater numbers than was the case a decade ago, audiology teams are in a better position to intervene early on. Full evaluation of the aetiology of UHL ensures that risk of progression to bilateral HL is identified, and can be addressed in the treatment planning. This allows parents to be part of the decision-making and management for their children to minimise speech / language and education delays. There needs to be ongoing audiological assessment to monitor progressive and fluctuating losses and to identify cases that may become bilateral as soon as possible, usually associated with enlarged vestibular aqueduct syndrome (EVAS). It seems that early neural stimulation of the auditory system through both ears applies just as much to UHL as to bilateral HL. Full and effective masking to define true hearing levels in the impaired ear, are critical in deciding on the potential benefit of amplification, which has no benefit on a profoundly deaf ear. Management options, including amplification, acoustic modifications and FM systems, must all be considered and trialled where appropriate. Amplification trials should not be based merely on degree of loss and speech perception scores, but quality of life as well. Appropriately high expectations can play a very important role and as such the intermittent use of

amplification may have to be considered if there is the potential for improving academic and QoL outcomes for these children in certain situations. In addition, functional auditory assessments for both the child and the parents can contribute valuable information for rehabilitation, together with speech / language assessment and monitoring. Even if we are uncertain of the benefits of the intervention strategy, we are obligated to consider them and evaluate outcomes before they are discounted, ensuring that informed choices are being made for the child with the family. A study conducted by the NHSP team in the UK (Bears study) recognised that the impact of diagnosis of UHL in early life could be just as devastating for families as for those with bilateral hearing loss, which lead into a structured intervention plan.

Conclusion The negative impact of UHL on children’s speech and language development and academic outcomes is now well recognised. With the NHSP detecting cases of UHL in early life, there is a clear need to define the population, to identify risk factors for speech, language, educational and social delay in UHL and to establish consistency, timely and effective management for each case aiming to reduce the gap between detection and appropriate intervention. The management plan starts at diagnosis and continues into school and beyond. We have an obligation to contribute to policy across audiology teams and to be the advocates for these children and families, improving their QoL and levelling the playing field for equal opportunities and choices into adulthood. The current evidence base for UHL is clear; UHL is not benign and therefore should not be treated as such. Our approach to management of UHL in children may be expressed by a quotation by Michaelangelo: “The greater danger for most of us lies not in setting our aim too high and falling short; but in setting our aim too low, and achieving our mark.”! Further reading Davis A, Devoe S, Robertson H. UK Trial of Early amplification in children with unilateral or mild hearing impairments. National workshop on mild and unilateral hearing loss, Colorado, CDC and Marion Downs Centre; 2005. Watier-Launcey C, Soin C, Manceau A, Ployet MJ. Necessity of auditory and academic supervision in patients with unilateral hearing disorders: retrospective study of 175 children. Ann Otolaryngol Chir Cervicofac 1998;115(3):149-55. Ross DS, Visser SN, Holstrum WJ, Qin T, Kenneson A. Highly variable population-based prevalence rates of unilateral hearing loss after the application of common sense definitions. Ear Hear 2010;31(1):126-33.

ENT & audiology news | www.entandaudiologynews.com

Borg E, Risberg A, McAllister B, Undemar BM, Edquist G, Reinholdson AC, Wiking-Johnsson A, WillstedtSvensson U. Language development in hearing-impaired children. Establishment of a reference material for a 'Language test for hearing impaired children. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2002;65(1):15-26. Fitzpatrick EM, Durieux-Smith A, Whittingham J. Clinical practice for children with mild bilateral and unilateral hearing loss. Ear Hear 2010;31(3):392-400. Bess FH, Tharpe AM. Case history data on unilaterally hearing-impaired children. Ear Hear 1986;7(1): 20-6. Lieu JE, Tye-Murray N, Karzon RK, Piccirillo JF. Unilateral hearing loss is associated with worse speech-language scores in children. Pediatrics 2010;125(6):1348-55. Kiese-Himmel C. Unilateral sensorineural hearing impairment in childhood: analysis of 31 consecutive cases. Int J Audiol 2002;41(1): 57-63. Lieu JE. Speech-Language and educational consequences of unilateral hearing loss in children. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2004;130(5):524-30. Lieu JE. Children with unilateral hearing loss. Semin Hear 2010;31(4):275-88. McKay S. To aid or not to aid: children with unilateral hearing loss; 2002. [http://www.audiologyonline.com/ articles/pf_article_detail.asp?article_id=357] Kenworthy OT, Klee T, Tharpe AM. Speech recognition ability of children with unilateral sensorineural hearing loss as a function of amplification, speech stimuli and listening condition. Ear Hear 1990;11(4):264-70. Brookhauser PE, Worthington DW, Kelly WJ. Unilateral hearing loss in children. Laryngoscope 1991;101(12, part 1):1264-72. Oyler RF, A. Oyler AL, Matkin ND. Unilateral hearing loss: demographics and educational impact. Language, Speech and Hearing Services in Schools 1988;19:201-10. Bovo R, Martini A, Agnoletto M, Beghi A, Carmignoto D, Milani M, Zangaglia AM. Auditory and academic performance of children with unilateral hearing loss. Scand Audiol Suppl 1988;30:71-4. Borton SA, Mauze E, Lieu JE. Quality of life in children with unilateral hearing loss: a pilot study. Am J Audiol 2010;19(1):61-72. Stein DM. Psychosocial characteristics of school-age children with unilateral hearing losses. J Acad Rehabil Audiol 1983;16:12-22. Klee TM, Davis-Dansky E. A comparison of unilaterally hearing-impaired children and normal hearing children on a battery of standardized language tests. Ear Hear 1986;7(1):27-37. Tharpe AM. Minimal hearing loss in children: the facts and the fiction. Sound foundation through early amplification, Chicago; 2007. Tharpe AM. Unilateral hearing loss in children: a mountain or a molehill? Hear J 2007;60(7):10-17. Tharpe AM. Unilateral and mild bilateral hearing loss in children: past and current perspectives. Trends Amplif 2008;12(1):7-15. Bess FH, Tharpe AM. Unilateral hearing impairment in children. Pediatrics 1984;74:206-16. Holstrum WJ, Gaffney M, Gravel JS, Oyler RF, Ross S. Early intervention for children with unilateral and mild bilateral degrees of hearing loss. Trends Amplif 2008;12(1):35-41. Yoshinaga-Itano C. Johnson CD, Carpenter K, Brown AS. Outcomes of children with mild bilateral hearing loss and unilateral hearing loss. Semin Hear 2008;29(2):196-210.

47

Amplification Options for Mild Bilateral & Unilateral Hearing Loss in Children: a literature overview Cherilee Rutherford, AuD, Lecturer and Director of the MSc Advanced Audiology & Audiology Short Courses. Correspondence The Ear Institute, University College London, 332 Gray’s Inn Road, London, WC1X 8EE, UK. E: cherilee.rutherford@ ucl.ac.uk Declaration of Competing Interests None declared.

T

he past few years has shown a growing interest from professionals in the diagnosis and management of children with minimal hearing loss, including mild bilateral (MBHL) and unilateral hearing loss (UHL). In addition to moderate

and more severe losses, MBHL and UHL are sometimes identified through universal newborn hearing screening programs, but more often these type of hearing losses are identified later during the school age years. The impact of moderate and severeprofound hearing loss on language, communication and academic development is well documented and subsequent management in terms of amplification, parental guidance, and early communication intervention is well established. The management involved with MBHL and UHL is less clear and many questions remain unanswered. In 2005 the Centre for Disease Control and the Marion Downs Hearing Centre hosted a national workshop on mild and unilateral hearing loss to consolidate current knowledge regarding prevalence, screening, diagnosis, amplification, outcomes, and early intervention. This review will attempt to (1) highlight the differences between MBHL, UHL, and single-sided deafness (SDD) and, (2) summarise the amplification options as part of the holistic treatment approach for children with MBHL or UHL.

Definitions of MBHL, UHL & SDD Historically there has been no consensus on the definitions of MBHL and UHL and terms like ‘slight’, ‘mild’, and ‘minimal’ were used to describe a variety of permanent, sensorineural, conductive, and unilateral hearing losses ranging from 16-45dB HL. For the purpose of this review the definitions of MBHL and UHL will be used as proposed by the 2005 CDC National Workshop: MBHL: “Calculated or predicted average pure tone air conduction (PTA) thresholds for both ears at 500Hz, 1kHz, 2kHz between 20 and 40dB HL or PTA thresholds greater than 25dB HL at two or more frequencies above 2kHz (that is, 3, 4, 6, 8kHz)”. UHL: “Calculated or predicted average PTA threshold in the low frequencies (500Hz, 1kHz, and 2kHz) of any level greater than 20dB HL, or, in the high frequencies, PTA thresholds greater than 25dB HL at two or more frequencies above

2,000Hz in the affected ear. PTA average thresholds in the good ear should be less than or equal to 15dB HL”. Ross et al. (2008)1 described terms such as ‘mild’, ‘slight’, ‘minimal’ as confusing and indicated that the terminology could be misleading as to how serious the effects of these types of hearing losses potentially could be. Single-sided deafness (SDD): Sometimes the terms UHL and SDD are used interchangeably and again these can be confusing. Although there is currently no clinical consensus, the more typical reference to SDD is in the context of permanent, severe-to-profound sensorineural hearing loss in the poor ear, with normal hearing in the other ear.2,3

Hearing aids Hearing aid fitting to children with MBHL presents parents and clinicians with quite a few dilemmas. Does the benefit of amplification outweigh the cost associated with

...terms such as ‘mild’, ‘slight’, ‘minimal’ as confusing and indicated that the terminology could be misleading as to how serious the effects of these types of hearing losses potentially could be 48

ENT & audiology news | www.entandaudiologynews.com

feature it? Should children be fitted monaurally or binaurally? What type of ear mould coupling is preferred and which dynamic features are proven to deliver the best outcomes? Would non-amplification be detrimental to their development and when is the best time to provide hearing aids? More importantly, what are the benefits of amplification for this group? Davis, Reeve & Hind (2001)4 suggested that benefit assessments for amplification should include acceptance of amplification, use of amplification, development of speech, language and communication, quality of life for the child, and quality of family life. These are questions that clinicians are faced with in everyday practice and unfortunately the evidence base is currently not yet there to support decision making. While the clinical community is awaiting the results of research efforts in this field, clinicians are encouraged to follow existing guidelines (American Academy of Audiology Paediatric Amplification Protocol, 2003; JCIH 2007 Position Statement)5,6 until more evidence becomes available. McKay, Gravel, & Tharpe (2008)7 suggested that the lack of acoustic stimulation could lead to auditory deprivation. Children who have been wearing amplification for longer were found to have better speech recognition abilities. They propose that, in a conservative effort to reduce poor speech recognition in the future, hearing aids should be considered and offered to children with MBHL or UHL. Following current best practice guidelines, this means that a binaural fitting would be recommended for MBHL patients. According to the American Academy of Audiology Pediatric Amplification Protocol (2003),5 children with MBHL should be considered for amplification and / or FM systems. Decisions about trialling hearing aids and / or FM systems should be made with the family and child’s preferences in mind, and considering the child’s educational and communicative development. When the decision has been made to fit hearing aids, standard good practice guidelines should be followed, including the use of probe microphone measures and existing prescriptive methods such as the Desired Sensation Level (DSL i/o). Several input levels should be measured to prevent over-amplification in this population. Probe microphone measures should also be performed at every appointment to accommodate the child’s growing ear canal that could influence gain settings on the instrument. RECD’s should be used when possible. When a child rejects the use of hearing aids, it may be that some acoustic cues have been reduced by the

fitting of a full shell earmould. Open fittings should be considered to maintain the natural quality of the child’s own voice perception, although an external vent may be more suitable for infants with small ear canals. McKay, Gravel, & Tharpe (2008)7 provided these practical guidelines on hearing aid features and settings for children with MBHL: 1. Hearing instrument features need to be considered for each patient individually. 2. Feedback cancellation may not be necessary due to limited gain settings, but it may be required in certain conditions such as when the child is wearing a hat or lying down. 3. Other features such as multiple memories and directional microphones should be considered in light of the child’s ability to manipulate the controls and choosing the correct situation to make the adjustment in. The use of automatic microphone switching could be beneficial. Alternatively, the hearing aid could be set to directional mode during instruction time.

Tharpe, Eiten & Abbot Gabbard (2008)8 suggested further that: 1. Linear amplification with low threshold compression could be appropriate on the basis that children with MBHL have a larger dynamic range of hearing so WDRC is not needed. 2. Omni-directional microphone setting should be used for infants / toddlers who are mostly in the home environment perhaps with auto switching for schoolage children with the option to manually override. 3. Clinicians should carefully consider the internal noise floor in certain hearing aids that may interfere with speech perception. The issue of binaural interference (poorer bilateral performance with asymmetric auditory input) may be a problem in children with UHL who have been provided with a hearing aid on the poor ear and therefore should be monitored closely by the clinician.

FM systems FM is a type of wireless technology that helps with speech understanding in noise. The person speaking typically wears a transmitter microphone and speech signals are then sent directly to the listener via harmless radio waves to an FM receiver which the user wears as part of a small behind-the-ear hearing aid. It is well known that children with HI need a much better signal to noise ratio (SNR) than normally hearing (NH) children

ENT & audiology news | www.entandaudiologynews.com

for optimum speech understanding in background noise. FM systems provide the best improvement in SNR (perhaps as much as 12-18dB) over directional hearing aid microphones (Hawkins, 1984).9 As a general guiding principle, Hawkins recommended that HI children in mainstream education should have the best sound quality from amplification and SNR as reverberation times and SNR in typical classrooms are often outside recommended optimal levels. There is a common perception among professionals that FM use is reserved for more severe-profound hearing losses and that the high cost of personal FM systems often discourage patients from making use of it. Perceptions like these need to be challenged by evidence about the real world benefits of FM use in children with milder losses. A combination of speech perception scores, functional measures, and survey data could be used to demonstrate the efficacy of such an approach to amplification. When should an FM system be offered to a child with MBHL? Tharpe, Eiten & Abbot Gabbard (2008)8 suggested that candidacy be considered when a child performs more poorly than normative data in speech in noise tasks, struggles academically, shows listening fatigue, or struggles to listen in noisy situations. This decision needs to be made while taking the parents’, teacher’s and, importantly, the child’s views into account. A monaural FM fitting configuration is recommended, leaving the other ear unoccluded and free for surround listening when the speaker is not using a microphone.8 Hawkins (1984)9 recommended that the teacher’s transmitter microphone should be set to directional mode as the standard configuration (this would lead to an additional 3dB advantage). McKay et al. (2008)7 pointed out that sound level FM / infrared devices could potentially benefit all children in a classroom (HI and NH), as well as the teacher (less vocal strain), but it might not be sufficient for the HI child who may still require an ear level FM system in addition. It is recommended that this be provided on a trial basis and that an assessment tool such as the SIFTER is used to monitor functional listening. Tharpe & Bess (1999)10 outlined some of the advantages of soundfield FM: (1) The child is not being isolated and labelled as hearing impaired; (2) Reasonable cost – ear level FM systems are more expensive than soundfield systems; (3) Normal hearing children could also benefit from SNR improvements. For infants and toddlers there is currently no evidence to suggest benefit from FM systems, but theoretically they should benefit from an improved SNR. Guidance 49

feature should be provided on when to use FM with infants & toddlers, for example in the stroller, in the car, in day care or preschool during instruction time.7

CROS aids, Bone anchored solutions and Transcranial amplification CROS aids may be considered as an option for older children with SDD as they are more able than younger children to monitor their environment, change their head position, and change settings on the device to accommodate changes in the listening environment.3 Limited outcome data exist for the use of bone anchored devices in children. The two studies found in the literature had typically small sample sizes, and reported outcomes for mostly teenage children. The data, however small, does seem to indicate some benefit for users post-fitting with increases in speech performance in noise and listening abilities.11,12 Transcranial devices like Transear™ and Transcranial CROS work on the principle of providing stimulation to the better cochlea through placement on / in the poorer ear using a BTE, ITE or CIC device. Again, these technologies are showing some promise but currently have very limited outcome data to support an evidence-based recommendation to parents of children with SDD. The interested reader may refer to www.transear.com and Valente & Oeding (2010)13 for a more detailed review on these devices.

Cochlear implants Some preliminary data for cochlear implants as a treatment option for SDD are starting to emerge,14-16 but these are based

focus groups of parents indicated they want to know as soon as possible of any HI, regardless of the degree of loss 50

on adult patients and predictions about the applicability to the paediatric population may be premature. In the UK, this approach is not currently supported by the NICE (National Institute of Clinical Excellence) guidelines, which governs decision making regarding implantation, but it is an interesting concept to watch for the future. No discussion of treatment options for hearing impairment however can be complete by simply referring to technology alone, and must always be accompanied by early intervention considerations, parental counselling and other rehabilitative efforts to ensure optimal outcomes for the HI child and his / her family.

Early intervention Davis, Reeve & Hind (2001)4 noted that in focus groups, parents indicated they want to know as soon as possible of any HI, regardless of the degree of loss. This could have important implications for screening practices and equipment / algorithms to detect mild losses and more international surveys should be done to add data to this issue highlighted by parents. These authors also suggested such children be monitored for progressive HL and that genetic counselling may also have to be part of the management process. Davis et al. (2001)4 suggested management of mild HL in four areas: (1) Family support, including education; (2) Ongoing assessment and review, mainly audiological monitoring of hearing loss; (3) Communication including the encouragement of early communication, speech and language development; (4) Management choices such as amplification and FM device usage.

McKay, Gravel & Tharpe (2008)7 recommended that if parents preferred to follow a ‘wait & see’ approach before fitting amplification, this time should be used to educate them on assessing auditory behaviours, managing the acoustic environment for optimal communication, and to stimulate and model good communication. Referral to early intervention services should be made and speech & language development should be proactively monitored.

Parental counselling A list of recommended activities and practices for informational counselling is attached in Appendix A. A downloadable reference document for parents on functional auditory measures is also available in Appendix B. Another excellent resource for parents has been developed by McKay (2010),3 entitled Infants and Toddlers with UHL – A Parent’s Guide, and is well worth a read. Tharpe, Eiten & Abbot Gabbard (2008)8 noted that children typically have large RECDs and therefore gain predictions may only show a few decibels. The counselling implication is therefore a discussion on the cost effectiveness of wearing hearing aids. Perhaps counselling the family on effective communication strategies should take greater prominence. Hearing aids as a treatment option can then again be considered later on. Part of the counselling discussion should also incorporate awareness training of hearing conservation and noise protection, and the benefits of binaural hearing (localisation, binaural squelch, binaural summation, head shadow effect). !

Appendix A Suggested Early Intervention Strategies for children and families with MBHL or UHL.17 ● As a minimum, family members must receive information about MBHL or UHL. Provide information to help them observe their child, provide ideas for early intervention activities, and help them monitor their child for signs of progressive hearing loss or bilateral hearing loss. ● Audiologists must provide information regarding functional auditory skills, provide hearing aids and / or FM systems on a trial basis, help the family





ENT & audiology news | www.entandaudiologynews.com

with use of amplification and developing communication skills in more challenging acoustic environments. Create or modify the acoustic environment to suit learning: reduce background noise, distance from the teacher / speaker, reduce reverberation, use carpets / drapes, cover feet of chairs with felt, ensure good lighting, keep the child’s interest by adjusting activities, help family read infant cues to stimulate reciprocal communicative behaviour. Put parents of children with MBHL / UHL in touch with each other to share experiences.

feature ●







Provide informational support to the teacher / caregivers regarding the effects of MBHL / UHL. Provide visual information in addition to auditory information to aid understanding. Write instructions down. Help child to see speaker’s lips so they can benefit from lipreading. Make eye contact and obtain child’s attention before speaking to him / her. Speak a little bit louder. Maintain face-to-face contact with family / caregivers (not just ‘phone calls / emails) to ensure the importance of the situation in perceived.

Appendix B Incorporating functional auditory measures into paediatric practice (Tharpe & Flynn) http://www.oticonusa.com/eprise/ main/SiteGen/Uploads/Public/ Downloads_Oticon/Pediatrics/ Inc_Functional_Measures_Guide.pdf

References 1. Ross DS, Holstrum WJ, Gaffney M, Green D, Oyler RF, Gravel JS. Hearing screening and diagnostic evaluation of children with unilateral and mild bilateral hearing loss. Trends Amplif 2008;12(1):27-34. 2. Lieu JEC. Unilateral hearing loss in children. Semin Hear 2010;31(4):275-89. 3. McKay S. Audiological management of children with single-sided deafness. Semin Hear 2010;31(4):290-312. 4. Davis A, Reeve K, Hind SB. Children with mild and unilateral hearing loss. In A Sound Foundation Through Early Amplification – Proceedings of the Second International Conference; 2001:179-186. 5. American Academy of Audiology. Pediatric Amplification Protocol; 2003. [http://www.audiology.org/resources/documentlibrary/Documents/peda mp.pdf] 6. Joint Committee on Infant Hearing (JCIH) Year 2007 Position Statement: Principles and Guidelines for Early Hearing Detection and Intervemtion Programs. [http://www.soundbeginnings.org/download/JCIH_Executive_Summary.p df] 7. McKay S, Gravel JS, Tharpe AM. Amplification considerations for children with minimal or mild bilateral and unilateral hearing loss. Trends Amplif 2008;12(1):43-54. 8. Tharpe AM, Eiten L, Abbot-Gabbard S. Hearing technology. Semin Hear 2008;29(2):169-77. 9. Hawkins DB. Comparisons of speech recognition in noise by mildly tomoderately hearing impaired children using hearing aids and FM systems. J Speech Hear Disord 1984;49(4):409-18. 10. Tharpe AM, Bess FH. Minimal progressive and fluctuating hearing losses in children. Characteristics, identification & management. Pediatr Clin North Am 1999;46(1):65-78. 11. Christensen L, Dornhoffer JL. Bone anchored hearing aids for unilateral hearing loss in teenagers. Otol Neurotol 2008;29(8):1120-2.

Now you can Subscribe Securely online. Subscribe to ENT& audiology news for 1 year (6 issues)

and receive

2 issues FREE

12. Christensen L, Richter GT, Dornhoffer JL. Update on bone anchored hearing aids in pediatric patients with profound unilateral sensorineural hearing loss. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2010;136(2):175-7. 13. Valente M, Oeding K. Transcranial contralateral routing of the signal as a fitting option for patients with single-sided deafness. Semin Hear 2010;31(4):366-77. 14. Anrdt S, Aschendorff A, Laszig R, Beck R, Schild C, Kroeger S, Ihorst G, Wesarg T. Comparison of Pseudobinaural Hearing to Real Binaural Hearing Rehabilitation After Cochlear Implantation in Patients With Unilateral Deafness and Tinnitus. Otol Neurotol 2011;32(1):39-47. 15. Baguley DM. Cochlear Implants in Single-Sided Deafness and Tinnitus. Semin Hear 2010;31(4):410-3. 16. Buechner A, Brendel M, Lesinki-schiedat A, Wenzel G, Frohne-Buechner C, Jaeger B, Lenarz T. Cochlear Implantation in Unilateral Deaf Subjects Associated With Ipsilateral Tinnitus. Otol Neurotol 2010;31(9):1381-5. 17. National Workshop on Mild and Unilateral Hearing Loss: Workshop Proceedings. Breckenridge (CO). Centres for Disease Control and Prevention (2005).

scan the QR code above for your instant link

ENT & audiology news | www.entandaudiologynews.com

51

Tool Development: developing a rationale for empowering children with hearing loss Melanie Gregory, Staff Audiologist. Correspondence Ida Institute, Egebaekvej 98, DK-2850, Naerum, Denmark. E: [email protected] Declaration of Competing Interests None declared. The Ida Institute is a non-profit making educational organisation, funded by the Oticon Foundation, whose mission is to ‘foster a better understanding of the human dynamics associated with hearing loss’. W: www.idainstitute.com

Real life knowledge and experience of the field is a key element for the innovation process as it is the starting point for developing a shared understanding of the dilemmas experienced by the participants 52

A

s an educational institute, we design and create processes and tools to enhance communication between the patient and hearing care professional and to facilitate a patient-centred approach to rehabilitation. In this article we

outline the Ida institute’s approach to innovation and tool development for professionals working with children with hearing loss and their families and describe a prototype of a new tool that we are developing to empower older children with hearing loss within their own rehabilitation process. In January 2011 the Ida Institute held a paediatric focus group in Skodsborg, Denmark. The purpose of this group was to address the following question: “What are the unique challenges facing professionals who work with children with hearing loss and their families? How can existing Ida Institute tools be adapted or improved to address these challenges?”

A co-creative process to develop new tools The focus group was designed as a cocreative laboratory, which means we bring professionals together from around the world to engage with each other and to bring their expertise, knowledge, ideas and everyday clinical experience to the innovation process. The process has three interdependent stages: 1. To develop a shared understanding of the topic 2. To explore the challenges experienced by hearing care professionals who work within the area of paediatric audiology 3. To create ideas that can be transformed into a tangible form for tools that address these dilemmas. The aim is to identify a specific clinical dilemma or challenge and to develop ideas into a practical tool that can be used in a clinical situation. The tool could be a board game, a metaphor, a new process, a service on the internet… the possibilities are limitless.

Developing the rationale for the paediatric tool Understanding the challenges experienced by paediatric audiologists Eileen Rall, PhD described the holistic role of the paediatric audiologists when she said: “Audiologists not only help enhance communication by improving access to sound through technology, but also have a role to play in promoting the healthy development of the child, as hearing can

impact on the social, emotional and cognitive development of the child. Part of our role can be seen as helping parents to understand the importance of healthy attachment within the family system, supporting parents through their feelings associated with grief and helping parents to understand the impact of hearing loss on communication.” “Some of the challenges facing paediatric audiologists are: limited training opportunities for student audiologists within the field of paediatrics, quality assurance is frequently focused on protocols, rather than the real life experience of the patient and an ‘expert’ model does not always lead to a satisfying experience of audiological services for parents or their children.” Josephine Marriage, Skodsborg, 2011. Real life knowledge and experience of the field is a key element for the innovation process as it is the starting point for developing a shared understanding of the dilemmas experienced by the participants. Real life case examples were assigned before the focus group, allowing group discussions in a closed web forum and during group sessions in the focus group.

Three specific challenges emerged: 1. The management of hearing loss in paediatrics carries a unique responsibility The impact of hearing loss goes beyond the ear and can impact on other areas of development with a profound impact on the family system. Therefore there is a need

ENT & audiology news | www.entandaudiologynews.com

feature

Figure 1: Collage of ideas.

Figure 2: A tool draft presented during role play.

to not only support the family in management of the hearing loss, but to understand how the family is integral to the overall development of the child. Often the technology or tools used in paediatric audiology are adapted from adult technologies, with little consultation of professionals at an early stage in the development process and therefore these technologies do not fully address the needs of the paediatric population.

2. Effective communication with children and families is critical The first appointment with a family is the beginning of a long journey and participants felt it was imperative to start the journey well together. It is difficult to get a complete picture of daily life for a child from within the clinical setting. Participants wanted to be able to set the scene for positive, proactive interaction despite significant appointment time constraints. Their goal was to enable the child to express his / her own needs and to participate in decision making.

3. Managing hearing loss is a dynamic process There are challenges in understanding the changing circumstances of the family and different cultural backgrounds, alongside the current needs of children with hearing loss through different developmental stages. They wanted to be better equipped to see the whole child within his or her own personal context.

the dilemmas was developed.

Transforming ideas into tools Participants presented their new tool prototype using role play, which was filmed so that the rest of the group could review and evaluate each tool prototype. The tool drafts that were presented displayed some common themes and patterns. Some of the patterns included the use of pictures to represent and describe the individual daily routines of children with figures of family members and friends and objects that could be used by the child.

Reflections from the tool draft presentations We interviewed each group after the role play presentation so that they could describe what happened when they used the tool. These are some of the reflections about the new tool drafts from participants: “By using open-ended questions and the situations, we became more child-focused. The appointment is more focused on the child’s own routine and daily activities.” “The audiologist spent more time listening” “There was a balanced three-way dialogue between the audiologist, child and parent” “The child had a voice” “The parent, child and audiologist problem solve together” Figure 3: The My World Tool prototype.

Exploring the challenges and possible new solutions During this phase live theatre and role play were used based on clinical cases to further explore the dilemmas and to enact some clinical scenarios to explore the use of new or different approaches to those they might usually employ. Through reflection on ethnographic videos and discussion of case examples, a deeper understanding of

ENT & audiology news | www.entandaudiologynews.com

“It felt safe and empowering to manipulate the figures and objects” “I can concretely show what happens to me in daily life”

A new tool prototype Through a combination of the design elements, a new clinical tool emerged and was subsequently developed into an applicable prototype named ‘My World’. It is a booklet with schematic room drawings in which the child manipulates items relevant to different scenarios and shows the challenges or positive events linked to the situations of his / her real world experience. The My World framework allows the child to express himself / herself in pictures of daily events, including challenges and successes. My World is still in the development phase, and will be completed in cooperation with audiologists in the UK, Australia and the USA.

Conclusion From the point of view of the participants, the rationale for developing the tool in this format was to facilitate a child-centred dialogue reflecting the child’s own experience and so focus on important hearing and communication issues for the child at that time. The tool prototypes aimed to engage the child as an active participant giving him or her an equal voice with the parent and the audiologist. The tool gave a window for the parent and audiologist to understand the child’s experience of daily life. Each situation described by the child became an opportunity to understand the communication, social interaction and emotional response to that situation for the child. In addition, the description provided the possibility to review effective communication strategies and to problemsolve together. ! 53

features

European Society of Paediatric Otolaryngology May/June 2009

Paediatric Audiology at Alder Hey Children’s NHS Foundation Trust Sept/Oct 2009

Imaging the Paediatric Airway Jan/Feb 2010

Bone Anchored Hearing Aids in Children Mar/Apr 2010

Epidemiology of Paediatric Sleep Disordered Breathing Jul/Aug 2010

The European Society of Pediatric Otolaryngology Mr John Graham, Consultant Otolaryngologist. Correspondence Mr John Graham, Royal National Throat Nose and Ear Hospital, Gray's Inn Road, London WC1X 8DA, UK. E: john.graham10@ virgin.net Declaration of Competing Interests None declared. Acknowledgements I am very grateful to Carel Verwoerd and Chris Raine for input to this article and to Chris for the photograph of the ESPO Board.

Evolution of ESPO 1968-2010 ESPO was born in 1968, when Carlo Gatti Manacini, Renato Fior and Guilio Pestelozza, three ENT surgeons in the north of Italy, admired the existence of paediatric ENT as a separate subspecialty in Poland and other Eastern Bloc nations and decided to put their own primary interest in paediatric otolaryngology on a more formal footing. They organised a meeting of likeminded paediatric otolaryngologists in Sirmione, home of the Latin poet Catullus, on Lake Garda. The outcome of this meeting was that the European Working Group in Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology was formed. This fairly informal group grew and recruited members from other European countries, including the United Kingdom, where Robert Pracy in Liverpool and John Evans at Great Ormond Street were already established in the field of paediatric ENT. The First International Congress of Pediatric ENT was organised by the working group, again in Sirmione, in April

ESPO fosters strong links between British otolaryngologists and our colleagues on the continent and between specialists in ‘Western’ Europe and our colleagues in the previous Eastern Bloc, who have contributed greatly to ESPO throughout its life and are now well placed to take a leading role in its future

1977 and attracted 400 delegates. John Evans volunteered to host the next meeting in Bath, UK in 1981 and many of us who had recently been appointed to consultant jobs in the UK checked in, greedy for advice from experts like Sylvan Stool, Robin Cotton, John Evans and others on how to do a safe tracheotomy in a neonate weighing 1,200 grams and how to correct the laryngeal stenosis produced as a complication of the new lifesaving method of intubating and ventilating premature infants; as well as the new methods of objective hearing tests in infants. Cochlear implants were still largely in the future, but we were aware of their potential. Subsequently the main rôle of the European Working group was to hold four, then two yearly meetings, to introduce colleagues working in this expanding field to each other and encourage and present research, and to expose younger surgeons to teaching from experienced colleagues. The attendance at these meetings grew from the original 400 in Sirmione, and a more formal organisation, ESPO, was founded during the meeting hosted in Rotterdam, the Netherlands by Carel and Jetty Verwoerd in 1994. At subsequent congresses in Helsinki (1998), Oxford (2002) and Paris (2006) as many as 1,200 delegates registered. Prof Robert Ruben, from New York, attended the first Sirmione meeting in 1977 and two years later founded the International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology; Bob Ruben has remained a strong supporter of ESPO and always encourages authors to publish the papers they have read at ESPO meetings.

Structure and functions of ESPO ESPO is run by its board, consisting of past (me), present (Noel Garabedian) and future (Javier Cervera) presidents, a General Secretary (Carel Verwoerd), the Treasurer (Chris Raine, who else?) and the chair of the Members committee (Jetty VerwoerdVerhoef). ESPO Council has representatives from 23 European countries. Peter Robb

ENT & audiology news | www.entandaudiologynews.com

55

feature

and David Albert are the current UK reps. The national societies of paediatric ENT in Europe: Dutch-Flemish, Hungarian, Italian, Polish, Spanish, Greek, French and British (BAPO) are all associated with ESPO. The next president after Javier will be Anne Schilder from Utrecht, who will organise the 2012 congress in Amsterdam, the Netherlands. We also have liaison delegates from the US (ASPO), South America (IAPO) and India (APOI). The Japanese society (JSPO) has also contributed to meetings. Noel Garabedian is our current liaison link with ASPO. Carel Verwoerd, from Rotterdam, took over the job of General Secretary of ESPO in 2001 from the founding General Secretary, Renato Fior and acts as a point of liaison with other organisations. Javier Cervera, from Madrid will be the next President and he and Manuel Manrique will host the next meeting in Pamplona in Spain: June 5th-8th, 2010 (please note this in your diary NOW). We visited Pamplona and found it an excellent city to spend a few days; friendly and small enough to allow exploration on foot. Good range of hotels and excellent food and drink. The new conference centre seems the right size for an ESPO meeting. The St Firmin festival, when bulls are let loose in the streets of Pamplona, is held a month after the congress, in July, perhaps just as well. The congress website can be found at: www.espopamplona2010.com.

What of the current role of ESPO? I’m glad to say that ESPO does not have anything as tiresome as a Mission Statement, however it does have clear objectives, which are set out in the website:

to disseminate knowledge of ENT disorders in children and their treatment, ● to encourage co-operation across national boundaries and establish links between organisations involved with the care of children with ENT disorders, ● to promote clinical and basic research. Although ESPO does not have funds to pay for research, it can put researchers in touch with others in similar fields in other countries, ● to hold regular scientific congresses, ● to promote training programmes and help define standards for professional practice in Paediatric ENT. The ESPO website www.espo.eu.com has more details of the Society’s basic structure and functions, and the membership form. ●

Why join ESPO? • ESPO members normally join because they have a clear interest in paediatric ENT. Many are members of their national paediatric otolaryngology societies. In fact the UK has the highest number of members of any country. This is partly because of the success of BAPO, partly due to effective recruiting by Chris Raine and partly because of: • £££ / €€€ You get a discount on the registration fee for all ESPO meetings. You also get the International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology at the significantly reduced subscription of €120 a year. • The membership subscription is absurdly low, at €25 for one year, ---50 for two years. The application form is on the ESPO website. • You can attend, at a reduced rate (see

The ESPO Board. (L-R): John Graham, Jetty Verwoerd-Verhoef, Chris Raine, Noel Garabedian (President), Carel Verwoerd, Javier Cervera.

previous column) an ESPO congress every two years, meet old friends and update yourself from experts in the rapidly advancing fields of paediatric ENT. What’s the use of attending conferences? Some hospital managers certainly doubt the value of ‘jaunts for doctors’. One of our own dear managers provided the view that she didn’t “see the point of people being paid to have a holiday”, before disappearing out of contact on a series of totally essential management away days… My view is that medical conferences remain extremely valuable, even when they take us away from the important business of removing myriad tonsils to boost hospital income from the UK’s primary care trusts. Web searches, books (even Pediatric ENT: edited by Graham, Scadding and Bull; now in paperback – order your copy today!), emails and telecongresses cannot really replace live presentations that include time for indepth questions and discussion and total immersion in a topic, with unlimited time for sharing problems and setting up lifelong professional links that a three day meeting provides. Our own paediatric ENT association, BAPO, was founded as a spin-off from the Ghent ESPO meeting in 1990 when Peter Bull and I locked all the British delegates into a lecture room, only letting them out after we had all agreed to found our own society; the final details being sorted out during lively discussions with David Proops in the bar of the crosschannel ferry going home.

Conclusion ESPO is a lively organisation with excellent links across all European countries. In particular it fosters strong links between British otolaryngologists and our colleagues on the continent and between specialists in ‘Western’ Europe and our colleagues in the previous Eastern Bloc, who have contributed greatly to ESPO throughout its life and are now well placed to take a leading role in its future. ESPO is also highly respected and well placed to influence training and the organisation of services in paediatric ENT in Europe. Join now! !

FURTHER INFORMATION

Website: www.espo.eu.com www.espopamplona2010.com

56

ENT & audiology news | www.entandaudiologynews.com

feature

Paediatric Audiology at Alder Hey Children's NHS Foundation Trust Apart from the medical staff, the department is backed up by non-medical audiologists. The full spectrum of audiological services is offered here. Since I have been in this department, I have been involved in testing and managing the hearing of all age groups of children including those who have severe learning disabilities, syndromes, and neurological difficulties. As a Staff Grade in a busy teaching hospital, I have made a significant contribution to providing a comprehensive range of out-patient services for the children. My experience has allowed me to contribute to the development and improvement of the Audiology Service in the region and I have set up a peripheral clinic at May Logan in South Sefton which I run independently. I have one clinic per month for fast-track assessment of children hearing after meningitis and I am the key person to see the children referred to audiology for targeted follow-up from Newborn Hearing Screening. I

also share one clinic per week with an ENT Consultant to assess the children who have hearing problems and need surgical intervention. In addition, I have made a considerable contribution to the teaching programme of the medical and audiological students. ! Dr Ezeddin El Tabal, Staff Grade in Paediatric Audiology, Alder Hey Children's Hospital, Merseyside, UK. E: [email protected]

reprints available > > > >

Peer reviewed ABPI compliant Translations available Multiple country coordination

For more information and quotes, contact

[email protected]

matters ENT & audiology news | www.entandaudiologynews.com

57

Imaging the Paediatric Airway Laura Coleman, MRCP, Specialist Registrar in Radiology

M

ultidisciplinary co-operation in the assessment of the paediatric airway is essential to the safe management of infants and children with respiratory compromise. This article is not intended to be a comprehensive atlas of

airway anomalies but seeks to illustrate some of the situations where high quality imaging is central to diagnosis and management.

General considerations in radiology Helen Williams, FRCR, Consultant Paediatric Radiologist

Kate Parkes, Radiology Clinical Systems Manager

Michael Kuo, FRCS, Children’s Ear, Nose and Throat Surgeon

Correspondence Michael Kuo, Children’s Ear, Nose and Throat Surgeon, Birmingham Children’s Hospital, Steelhouse Lane, Birmingham B4 6NH, UK. E: [email protected] Declaration of Competing Interests None declared.

58

Many aspects of current imaging, such as Computed Tomography (CT) and Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), require a degree of patient co-operation and control in order to obtain adequate images. However, with a young child, especially those with developmental delay, this may not be possible. Therefore sedation and general anaesthesia have to be considered. Sedation can produce excellent results, avoiding invasive procedures, but requires careful monitoring at all times (respiratory rate, oxygen saturation). It poses the risk of destabilising the airway, increasing the risk of aspiration and causing respiratory compromise. Therefore only suitable candidates must be chosen and resuscitation equipment needs to be close by. Multidetector spiral CT is often used in paediatric imaging due to its faster acquisition times, reduction in ionising radiation exposure and ability to produce better 3D image reconstructions. Faster scanning helps to reduce movement artefact which is of particular benefit with a paediatric population who can't necessarily follow instructions and co-operate with, for example, breath-holding. If there is any risk of destabilising the airway in a child, especially one with known or suspected airway abnormality, then general anaesthesia is by far the safest option. It is important to remember that neonates and young infants are obligate nasal breathers, so any form of nasal airway obstruction can lead to acute respiratory compromise. Airway control aided by general anaesthesia is best considered on a planned basis rather than as an emergency procedure in the CT or MRI suite. It should be carried out and closely supervised by a fully trained paediatric anaesthetist. Care must be taken to use MRI compatible equipment when necessary.

Foetal imaging Rapid improvements in ultrasound technology, particularly in improved image resolution, have facilitated the diagnosis of more complex disorders . Of particular relevance to the airway are the diagnoses of neck / thoracic masses causing compression of the airway and disease entities such as laryngeal atresia, both needing immediate intervention at birth. Apart from ultrasound visualisation of mass lesions, polyhydramnios picked up on foetal ultrasound may be an indirect indicator of possible foetal airway abnormalities, prompting further investigation. Where a mass lesion is detected in the neck, foetal MRI can be used to further define the mass, contributing to the differential diagnosis as well as defining its relationship to the airway (Figure 1). This aids the obstetrician and the paediatric airway surgeon in counselling the prospective parents particularly with respect to airway Figure 1: Sagittal T2 weighted foetal MRI image showing mass in the anterior neck.

ENT & audiology news | www.entandaudiologynews.com

feature

Figure 2A: Axial CT scan showing congenital piriform aperture stenosis.

Figure 2B: Coronal CT scan of same patient showing single incisor associated with congenital piriform aperture stenosis.

management during delivery and the appropriateness of an ex-utero intrapartum therapy (ExIT) procedure.

Neonates are obligate nasal breathers for the first few months of life and significant nasal obstruction results in respiratory distress, apnoea and cyanosis. Less acutely, it may manifest itself as difficulty feeding and a failure to thrive. The paediatric otolaryngologist may be asked to review a child in whom it has been impossible to pass a nasogastric tube down one nostril to assess for unilateral choanal atresia. The availability of fine neonatal endoscopes (1.8mm) allows endoscopic examination, but CT remains the modality of choice for defining bony anatomy and is able to highlight the absence of nasal bones as well as the presence and thickness of bony atresia plates. Three-dimensional CT imaging can be used for planning nasal construction / reconstruction surgery in those paediatric patients who are developmentally normal or near normal. Multiplanar CT or MRI is used to assess the intracranial contents in order to aid prognosis. MRI provides more detailed neuroanatomy and is able to confirm the

presence or absence of the olfactory nerves. Congenital anterior piriform aperture stenosis / central midline incisor syndrome arises from overgrowth of the nasal process of the maxilla, narrowing the nasal piriform aperture and is an uncommon cause of upper airway obstruction in the neonate. Clinically, there is a narrowing of the anterior choana. CT demonstrates a narrowed anterior nasal cavity: piriform aperture