Author Guidelines for 8

3 downloads 0 Views 1MB Size Report
Dr. Aghareed M. Tayeb, Chemical Engineering Dept., Faculty of Engineering, Minia .... fields induce due to the rest of the charged particles of the solar wind, there is .... But the acceleration of P1 towards the black hole changes with time. ..... f < n * 6.63 * 10-34 * 3.142 / ( 4* 9.11 * 10-31 * 1.89 * 1022 ) for all n natural number.
How Does A Super Massive Black Hole Interact with Its Host Galaxy? By K.H.K. Geerasee Wijesuriya Volume 26, 2018

ISSN (Print) 2313-4410 & ISSN (Online) 2313-4402

© ASRJETS THESIS PUBLICATION http://asrjetsjournal.org/

ASRJETS research papers are currently indexed by:

© ASRJETS THESIS PUBLICATION http://asrjetsjournal.org/

How Does A Super Massive Black Hole Interact with Its Host Galaxy?

Copyright © 2018 by K.H.K. Geerasee Wijesuriya All rights reserved. No part of this thesis may be produced or transmitted in any form or by any means without written permission of the author. ISSN (Print) 2313-4410 & ISSN (Online) 2313-4402

The ASRJETS is published and hosted by the Global Society of Scientific Research and Researchers (GSSRR).

Members of the Editorial Board EDITOR IN CHIEF Dr. Mohammad Othman, Global Society of Scientific Research and Researchers. Tel: 00962788780593, [email protected], Jordan

EXECUTIVE MANAGING EDITOR Dr. Mohammad Othman, Global Society of 00962788780593, [email protected], Jordan

Scientific

Research

and

Researchers.

Tel:

COORDINATING EDITOR Dr. Daniela Roxana Andron, Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu, Departamentul Drept Privat și Științele Educației, Universitatea Lucian Blaga din Sibiu, http://dppd.ulbsibiu.ro, http://drept.ulbsibiu.ro/centrul-ccap, tel. +40-269-211 602, fax +40-269-235 [email protected], Romania

SECTION EDITORS Prof. Dr. Hye-Kyung Pang, Business Administrations Department, Hallym University, #1, Ockcheon-dong, Chooncheonsi, Kangwon-do, [email protected], [email protected]/ (office)82-33-248-3312/ (cell) 82-10-5311-6131, Korea, Republic of Prof. Dr. Felina Panas Espique, Professor, School of Teacher Education, Saint Louis University, Baguio City. Dean of the School of Teacher Education. Bonifacio St., Baguio City, 2600, (074) 447-0664 (landline), Mobile Number 099-89763236, [email protected], Philippines Prof. Dr. Indrani Pramod Kelkar, Department of Mathematics,Chief Mentor, Acharya Institute of Technology, Soldevanahalli, Hesaraghatta Main Road, Banavara Post, Bangalore560 107. Cell : 9164685067,[email protected], India

LAYOUT EDITORS & COPYEDITORS Dr. Christina De Simone, Faculty of Education, University of Ottawa.333 Chapel Street, Suite 305, Ottawa, Ontario, K1N 8Y8, tel. 613-562-5800,4112, [email protected], Canada

EDITORIAL BOARD MEMBERS AND REVIEWERS Associate Professor Zaira Wahab, Iqra University, Pakistan

Asso. Prof. Girish Chandra Mishra, O.P.Jindal Institute of Technology,Raigarh(C.G.), [email protected], Tel: 09827408085., India Dr. Ankur Rastogi, O.P.Jindal Institute of Technology, Raigarh(C.G.),Mob.: 91 97559 27688, [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], India Dr.

Kabita

Kumari

Satapathy,

O.P.Jindal

Institute

of

Technology,Raigarh,

C.G.,

phone:

9770695159,

[email protected], India Dr. Salman Shahza, Institute of Clinical Psychology, University of Karachi, Pakistan Dr. Daniel Hailegiorgis Haile, Wollo University, Dessie, Ethiopia Dr. Lowida L. Alcalde, Northwestern Mindanao State College of Science and Technology, Philippines Dr. Fazal Shirazi, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Texas,Phone: 7133064951, [email protected], United States Asso. Prof. Mario Amar Fetalver, College of Arts & Sciences, Romblon State University, Philippines Dr. Esther Patrick Archibong, Dept. of Sociology, University of Calabar, [email protected], Nigeria Prof. Dr. Samir El-Sherif, College of Agriculture, Cairo University, Egypt Dr. Chandan Kumar Sarkar, IUBAT- International University of Business Agriculture and Technology, Telephone: 01717314333, 01726077766, E- Mail : [email protected], Bangladesh Dr. Narayan Ramappa Birasal, KLE Society’s Gudleppa Hallikeri College Haveri (Permanently affiliated to Karnatak University Dharwad, Reaccredited by NAAC),[email protected], 94491 22732, India Dr. Rabindra Kayastha, Kathmandu University, Nepal

Dr. Rasmeh Ali AlHuneiti, Brunel university, Telephone: (+974) 443070364, Mobile: (+97466190008) Email: [email protected], [email protected], United Kingdom Dr. Florian Marcel Nuta, Faculty of Economics/Danubius University of Galati,[email protected], 040722875933, Romania Dr. Arfan Yousaf, Department of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, PMAS-Arid Agriculture University Rawalpindi .Pakistan ,[email protected], +92-333-6504830, Pakistan Dr. Daniela Roxana Andron, Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu, Departamentul Drept Privat și Științele Educației, Universitatea Lucian Blaga din Sibiu, http://dppd.ulbsibiu.ro, http://drept.ulbsibiu.ro/centrul-ccap, tel. +40-269-211 602, fax +40-269-235 [email protected], Romania. Asso. Prof. Zakaria Ahmed, PRIMEASIA UNIVERSITY, MICROBIOLOGY DEPARTMENT, HBR TOWER, 9 BANANI, DHAKA 1213, Bangladesh Prof. Dr. Hamed Hmeda Kassem, Department of Zoology , Faculty of Science, Benghazi University, phone : + 218925476608, [email protected], Libya Dr. Hulela Keba, Botswana College of Agriculture Faculty of Agriculture Private Bag 0027. [email protected], [email protected], Botswana Dr. Aleksandra K. Nowicka, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, [email protected], Phone: +1 713792- 7514, United States Prof. Dr. Mahmoud Younis Mohammed Taha, Department of Dental Basic Sciences, College of Dentistry, Mosul University, Iraq Prof. Dr. Akbar Masood, Dean, Faculty of Biological Sciences Head, Department of Biochemistry, the University of Kashmir,[email protected], +91-9906966281, +91-194-2415697, India Prof. Dr. Ramel D. Tomaquin, Dean, CAS Surigao Del Sur State University Tandag City Surigao Del Sur, Philippines Prof. Dr. Iryna Morozova, Romance-Germanic Faculty, Odesa Mechnikov University, [email protected] (professional), [email protected] (personal) tel. +380506572043, +380487254143, Ukraine Prof. Dr. Ayhan Esi, Adiyaman University, Science and Art Faculty, Department of Mathematics, Turkey Prof. Dr. Felina Panas Espique, Professor, School of Teacher Education, Saint Louis University, Baguio City. Dean of the School of Teacher Education. Bonifacio St., Baguio City, 2600, (074) 447-0664 (landline), Mobile Number 099-89763236, [email protected], Philippines Prof. Dr. Hye-Kyung Pang, Business Administrations Department, Hallym University, #1, Ockcheon-dong, Chooncheonsi,

Kangwon-do, [email protected], [email protected]/ (office)82-33-248-3312/ (cell) 82-10-5311-6131, Korea,

Republic of Prof. Dr. Aghareed M. Tayeb, Chemical Engineering Dept., Faculty of Engineering, Minia University Minia, Egypt Prof. Dr. Maria Luisa A. Valdez, Dean of Colleges and Head of Graduate School, Batangas State University ARASOF Nasugbu Campus, Nasugbu, Batangas, Philippines Dr. Tahira Naz, Centre of excellence in Marine biology, karachi University pakistan., Pakistan Prof. Dr. Indrani Pramod Kelkar, Department of Mathematics,Chief Mentor, Acharya Institute of Technology, Soldevanahalli,

Hesaraghatta

Main

Road,

Banavara

Post,

Bangalore-

560

107.

Cell

:

9164685067,[email protected], India Dr. Agustin Nuñez Arceña, School Administrator/Dean of Colleges/Principal - University of the Visayas – Danao City Campus, Philippines Dr. Joseph Djeugap Fovo, University of Dschang, Faculty of Agronomy and Agricultural Science (FASA) Department of Plant Protection, Plant Pathology Laboratory, [email protected], Cameroon Asso. Prof. Fateh Mebarek-Oudina, Département des Sciences de la Matière, Faculté des Sciences, Université 20 Août 1955- Skikda (Skikda University, Algeria), Route El-Hadaeik, B.P. 26, Skikda 21000, Algeria Asso. Prof. Evangelos P. Hinis, National Technical University of Athens - NTUA, [email protected],Tel. +30 2107722911, Greece Prof. Dr. Manu Rathee, Head of Department Department of Prosthodontics and Crown & Bridge Post Graduate Institute of Dental Sciences Pt. B. D. Sharma University of Health Sciences, +91-9416141376 Rohtak, Haryana, India Dr. Christina De Simone, Faculty of Education, University of Ottawa.333 Chapel Street, Suite 305, Ottawa, Ontario, K1N 8Y8, tel. 613-562-5800,4112, [email protected], Canada.

How Does A Super Massive Black Hole Interact with Its Host Galaxy?

Doctor of Philosophy in Physics Short Thesis number 05 Carlfield University United States of America February 2018 K.H.K. Geerasee Wijesuriya Carlfield University Student ID: 2017-10-195618 Email address: [email protected] , [email protected] I1

Table of Content Abstract ………………………………………………………..…………………….…..…...03 Notations ………………………………………………………….………………….......…..03 Acknowledgement ……………………………………………….……………………...…...04 Keywords ……………………………………………………………..…………….........…..04 Introduction…………………………………………………………………………..…..…...05 Literature review …………………………………………………………….…………..…...06 Conceptual Theoretical Framework ……………………………………………………...…..07 Research Content……………………………………………………………………….….….07 Section 1……………………………………………………………………08 Section 2……………………………………………………………………17 Result Evaluation ……………………………………………….……………….……….…...21 Discussion ……………………………………………………………………………..….…..21 Conclusion ……………………………………………………………………….……....…....21 References ……………………………………………………………………….……..…......22 Appendix ………………………………………………………………………………………22

2II

Abstract Black hole is an object that is frequently appearing at the center of most of the galaxies in the distant universe. Supermassive Black hole is a black hole with a high mass density in the core of the black hole inside. But astronomers have already dealt with the high massive black holes (in another words, supermassive black holes). But the attempt of this research is to provide detailed innovative arguments regarding the real nature of supermassive black holes.

Notations Ψ1 = Wave function of the particle P1 Bi = the total magnetic field that influences on ‘i’ th particle qi

= the charge of the ‘i’th particle interact with the considering charged particle P1

mi = the mass of the ‘i’th particle interact with the considering charged particle P1. M = the mass of the black hole c

= speed of light

rs = the Schwarzschild radius of the massive body rs = 2GM / c2, where G is the gravitational constant.

III 3

Acknowledgement

I would like to thank and acknowledge my parents who are behind in my all achievements

Keywords

Schwarzschild radius ; Electromagnetic wave ; Black hole ; Supermassive ; charged particles; Solar wind ; Particle

IV 4

Introduction Black hole is an object that is frequently appearing at the center of most of the galaxies in the distant universe. Supermassive Black hole is a black hole with a high mass density in the core of the black hole inside. If some object has arrived the radius of Schwarzschild radius, any Electromagnetic wave (EM) that propagates towards the black hole never goes out of the black hole. But usually identified black holes are the objects those have radius less than the Schwarzschild radius. Therefore any EM wave that propagates towards a black hole never goes out. Since no any EM wave goes out of the black hole, it appears to be dark. That’s why it called as a ‘black hole’. But according to the General Theory of Relativity, the space-time near to a high massive object bends due to the influence of the ‘high gravity’ of it. Since the black holes are much high gravity objects in the universe, the space-time near to a black hole bends with a large angle. According to such EM bending near to a black hole, there is an observation in Astronomy called as ‘gravitational lensing’. When a light ray propagates near to a black hole, due to the space-time curvature near to the black hole, the same star (that emitted the considering EM waves) appears at several positions in the image of it. But at the center of a black hole there is a place called as a ‘Singularity’. At the singularity, the curvature of space-time tends to infinity. And all the laws of physics break at the singularity. Therefore the discoveries regarding the black hole singularity have not been much developed. But astronomers have already dealt with the high massive black holes (in another words, supermassive black holes). But the attempt of this research is to provide detailed innovative arguments regarding the real nature of supermassive black holes.

5

Literature Review Although Newton’s Universal theory of Gravitation was acceptable before several centuries, it has been limited by recent and present investigations. The most recent theory of gravity is Einstein’s general theory of relativity. Instead of using the gravitational attractions to explain the nature of gravity, Einstein used the curvature of the space-time to explain the nature of the gravity. Since General theory of relativity has involved in all the areas of astrophysics all most, the applications of the theory are useful indeed. According to Einstein’s General theory of relativity, there is a radius limit away from a black hole identified as ‘Schwarzschild radius’. Once the radius of an object in the universe arrived this radius limit, no any electromagnetic wave or a particle can go away from the influence of the black hole. Usually at the center of a supermassive black hole, there is a place called as ‘singularity’. At the singularity position, all the physics laws break down and no one did explain the nature of the singularity in detail. We know that our sun and almost other highly energized stars in the distant universe eject a soup of charged particles to the outer space with high speeds. Those charged particles are much energized and capable to interact with outer environment of space. But when a charged particle of the solar wind arrives the force acting area of a supermassive black hole, there may be special situations under that particular status. First part of this research will explore regarding that situation. Generally, at the center of a high massive galaxy there is a supermassive black hole and its density is much greater than the mass density of other black holes. Supermassive black holes are much energized and it is capable to control the host stars, planets and other host objects which are nearby to the supermassive black hole.

6

Conceptual Theoretical Framework

Supermassive Black hole is a black hole with a high mass density in the core of the black hole inside. Although astronomers have already dealt with the supermassive black holes, the attempt of this research is to provide detailed innovative arguments regarding the real nature of supermassive black holes and the nature of the interactions of the supermassive black hole with the host of its galaxy.

Research Content With this research, I intend to explore how the supermassive black hole controls the solar winds of the nearby stars and how the supermassive black hole controls the orbiting velocity of nearby stars/planets (we know that most of the black holes create the whole galaxy to rotate around the center of the galaxy). That means with this research, I will explore the supermassive black holes in two sections. 1st section is : how the supermassive black hole controls the solar winds of the nearby stars 2nd section is: how the supermassive black hole controls the orbiting velocity of nearby stars/planets

7

Section 01: How the supermassive black hole controls the solar winds of the nearby stars We know that in our solar system, the main power source is the Sun. While the sun is radiating energy, it emits solar winds also towards the atmosphere. Our Earth also influenced by that wind which generates by the Sun. The solar wind contains highly energized charged particles those are harmful for the life. Since the solar wind consists of charged particles, a high gravitational object (near to the exiting and propagating area of solar wind) can influence on the solar wind. In this case, I will study how the high gravitational force of the supermassive black hole influences on the charged particles of the solar wind of the nearby stars. Since the charged particles those emitted by the solar wind move though the free space, there is a magnetic field that induces near to those charged particles. Moreover rather than the magnetic fields induce due to the rest of the charged particles of the solar wind, there is another magnetic field that influences on the solar wind’ particles. That is the magnetic field due to the black hole. Let’s consider the solar wind that emits by a star near to the black hole. But due to the gravitational field of the black hole, the potential energy of the solar wind particles changes with time. As well as the kinetic energy also varies. Moreover, there are electric and magnetic potential energy variations with the solar wind particles. Thus when the solar wind particles oscillate, high energy photons emit and those emitting photons are influenced by the high gravity field of the black hole. Let’s find the wave function for a charged particle (P1) in the solar wind as below: (-ħ2 /2M1). ∇2 Ψ1 + {Σ [q 1 .qi ] / 4.π. ri – Σ GM1 mi /ri - GM1.M / R1 - Σ μ. Bi .cos θi} Ψ1 = E1 .Ψ1 Where M1 is the mass of the considering charged particle of the solar wind, q1 is the charge of the considering particle P1 of the solar wind, Ψ1 is the wave function of P1, E1 is the eigenvalue for the charged particle, Bi is the total magnetic field that influences on ‘i’ th particle (which interacts with the considering charged particle P1 ), qi is the charge of the ‘i’th particle interact with the considering charged particle P1 , mi is the mass of the ‘i’th particle interact with the considering charged particle P1. ri is the distance between P1 and ‘i’th charged particle in the solar wind. μ is the Bohr Magneton. M is the mass of the supermassive black hole, R1 is the distance between the center of the black hole and P1.

8

Then (-ħ2 / 2M1). ∇2 Ψ1 = E’1 Ψ1 . Thus , ∇2 Ψ1 = [ -2M1 E’1 / ħ2 ]. Ψ1 where E’1 = E1 - Σ [q 1 . qi ] / 4.π. ri + Σ GM1 mi / ri + GM1.M / R1 + Σ μ. Bi .cos θi …..(1.0) Then ∇2 Ψ1 + [2.E’1 .M1 / ħ2 ] Ψ1 = 0 Then Ψ1 = A.cos (x1 .r1) + B. sin (x1.r1) where x1 = [2.E’1 .M1 / ħ2 ] , r1 is the radial coordinate of the wave function Ψ of P1. But we consider the center of the black hole as the origin. Then r1 = R1 ………………………………….(01) And A, B are complex constants. But when r1 = 0, Ψ1 = 0 by (01) (since at the singularity, there is no any particle as P1) Thus A = 0 . Thus Ψ1 = B. sin (x1.r1). But at r1 = rs , Ψ1 = 0 (at the event horizon also there is no a physical particle). Thus B.sin (x1.rs) = 0. Thus sin (x1.rs) = 0. Thus (x1.rs) = nπ . Thus x1 |r1 = rs = nπ / rs ; where n is an integer (positive or negative). Thus [2.E’1 .M1 / ħ2 ] |

r1 = rs

= nπ / rs

E’1 | r1 = rs = [nħ2π / 2.M1 rs ] ………………………….(02) Thus Ψ1 = B. sin ( [2.E’1 .M1 / ħ2 ]. r1 ) ………………………..(03) By (02): [ E1 - Σ [q 1 . qi ] / 4.π. ri + Σ GM1 mi / ri + GM1.M / rs + Σ μ. Bi .cos θi ] = [nħ2π / 2.M1 rs ] ……………………………..(04) But Time dependent wave function can be written as: Ψ1 . e-i [ (E1’/ ħ) ] t = Ψ(t)1 Thus ∂ Ψ(t)1 / ∂t = (-i.E’1 / ħ). Ψ(t)1 . Then ∂2 Ψ(t)1 / ∂t2 = (-i.E’1 / ħ)2. Ψ1 = - (E’1 / ħ)2. Ψ(t)1

……………………..(05)

By (04): [ E1 - Σ [q 1 . qi ] / 4.π. ri + Σ GM1 mi / ri + Σ μ. Bi .cos θi ] = [nħ2π / 2.M1 rs ] - GM1.M / rs By (1.0): E’1 = E1 - Σ [q 1 . qi ] / 4.π. ri + Σ GM1 mi / ri + GM1.M / R1 + Σ μ. Bi .cos θi

9

Thus E’1 = [nħ2π / 2.M1 rs ] - GM1.M / rs + GM1.M / R1 = [nħ2π / 2.M1 rs ] - GM1.M / R’1 , where R’1 = r1 . rs / (r1 - rs) Thus E’1 = [nħ2π / 2.M1 rs ] - GM1.M / R’1 ……………………………(06) By (05) and (06): ∂2 Ψ(t)1 / ∂t2 = {[ GM1.M / ħ2 R’1 ] - [nπ / 2.M1 rs ] }2. Ψ(t)1 = a(t) = the linear acceleration of P1...(07) Equation (07) indicates the acceleration of P1 (a particle from the solar wind) towards the supermassive black hole. But the particle P1 attracts towards the black hole in a spiral manner. But the angular acceleration of P1 at time t (time t is the moment which the particle completes one orbit along the spiral motion path. i.e [ ti = t – 0] is the orbital time of P1) = a(t) / d (t) = Δω / Δti . But the acceleration of P1 towards the black hole changes with time. And d(t) is the radius of one circle of motion of spiral motion (towards the black hole) at time ‘t’. Δti = [ d(t) . Δω ] / a(t) = [ (d(t). vt2 / d(t2) ) – (d(t). vt1 / d(t1) ) ] / a(t) = [ d(t2) / a(t2) ] * [vt2 / d(t2) ) – vt1 / d(t1) ] ……………………(07) Here Δti ( = [t2 – 0] ) is an arbitrary time duration starting from the beginning of time (i.e. starting from t = 0. i.e. t1 = 0 But v(t1) = ∂ Ψ(t)1 / ∂t |t = t1 = (-i.E’1 / ħ). Ψ(t)1 | t= t1 = (-i.E’1 / ħ). B0.i. sin ( [2.E’1 .M1 / ħ2 ]. r1 ). e-i [ (E1’/ ħ) ] t1 (Where (B0 .i ) = B ). and v(t2) = ∂ Ψ(t)1 / ∂t |t = t2 = (-i.E’1 / ħ). Ψ(t)1 | t= t2 = (-i.E’1 / ħ). B0.i. sin ( [2.E’1 .M1 / ħ2 ]. r1 ). e-i [ (E1’/ ħ) ] t2 (Where (B0 .i ) = B ). Thus v (t1) = (E’1 / ħ). B0.sin ( [2.E’1 .M1 / ħ2 ]. r1 ). e-i [ (E1’/ ħ) ] t1 ……………………(08) and v(t2) = (E’1 / ħ). B0. sin ( [2.E’1 .M1 / ħ2 ]. r1 ). e-i [ (E1’/ ħ) ] t2 ……………………….…(09)

10

By (07): Δti = [ d(t2) / a(t2) ] * [vt2 / d(t2) ) – vt1 / d(t1) ] = [ v(t2) / a(t2) ] – [v(t1). d(t2) / ( d(t1).a(t2) ) ]…..(10) But t1 is consider as the beginning of the motion of the particle P1 towards the black hole. Therefore I consider t1 as 0. Thus by (08): v (t1) |t1 = 0 = (E’1 / ħ). B0.sin ( [2.E’1 .M1 / ħ2 ]. r1 )…………………………….(11) By (08), (09) and (10) Δti = [ v(t2) / a(t2) ] – [v(t1). d(t2) / ( d(t1).a(t2) ) ] But [ v(t2) / a(t2) ] = (E’1 / ħ). B0. sin ( [2.E’1 .M1 / ħ2 ]. r1 ). e-i [ (E1’/ ħ) ] t2 / {[ GM1.M / ħ2 R’1 ] - [nπ / 2.M1 rs ] }2. Ψ(t)1 = (E’1

/ ħ). B0. sin ( [2.E’1 .M1 / ħ2 ]. r1 ). e-i [ (E1’/ ħ) ] t2 / {[ GM1.M / ħ2 R’1 ] - [nπ / 2.M1 rs ] }2. B. .sin ( [2.E’1 .M1 / ħ2 ]. r1 ). e-i [ (E1’/ ħ) ] t2

= (E’1 / i.ħ). / { [ GM1.M / ħ2 R’1 ] - [nπ / 2.M1 rs ] }2………………………….(12) [v(t1) / a(t2) ) ] = (E’1 / ħ). B0.sin ( [2.E’1 .M1 / ħ2 ]. r1 ) / { [ GM1.M / ħ2 R’1 ] - [nπ / 2.M1 rs ] }2. B. sin ( [2.E’1 .M1 / ħ2 ]. r1 ). e-i [ (E1’/ ħ) ] t2 = (E’1 / iħ) /

{ [ GM1.M / ħ2 R’1 ] - [nπ / 2.M1 rs ] }2. e-i [ (E1’/ ħ) ] t2 …………………..(13)

Thus Δti = (E’1 / i.ħ). / { [ GM1.M / ħ2 R’1 ] - [nπ / 2.M1 rs ] }2 – (k. E’1 / iħ) /

{ [ GM1.M / ħ2 R’1 ] - [nπ / 2.M1 rs ] }2. e-i [ (E1’/ ħ) ] t2 ; where k = d(t2) / d(t1)

Δti = (E’1 / i.ħ). { [ 1 / { [ GM1.M / ħ2 R’1 ] - [nπ / 2.M1 rs ] }2 k ei [ (E1’/ ħ) ] t2 / [ GM1.M / ħ2 R’1 ] - [nπ / 2.M1 rs ] }2. }

Δti = (E’1 / i.ħ). [ ( k ei [ (E1’/ ħ) ] t2 - 1) / { [ - GM1.M / ħ2 R’1 ] + [nπ / 2.M1 rs ] }2 ]

11

Δti = E’1 . ( k ei [ (E1’/ ħ) ] t2 - 1) / [ (iħ). { (nπ / 2.M1 rs ) – (GM1.M / ħ2 R’1 ) }2 ]

*** DO NOT confuse on ‘i’ term in Δti and ‘i’ term in (iħ). ‘i’ term in (iħ) is √(-1) . And ‘i’ term in Δti is just the order number. But for some k0 complex number , I can write k.ei [ (E1’/ ħ) ] t2 as e [ ( i [ (E1’/ ħ) ]. k0. t2 ] . Δti = E’1 . ( e i. (E1’/ ħ) . k0. t2 - 1) / [ (iħ). { (nπ / 2.M1 rs ) – (GM1.M / ħ2 R’1 ) }2 ] Δti = E’1 .(1 + [ i. (E1’/ ħ) .k0 .t2] + [ i. (E1’/ ħ) .k0. t2]2 / 2! +… + [ i.(E1’/ ħ) . k0 .t2 ]n / n! +..-1) / [ (iħ). { (nπ / 2.M1 rs ) – (GM1.M / ħ2 R’1 ) }2 ] Thus Δti = (E’1 / ħ) * [ 1 / { (nπ / 2.M1 rs) – (GM1.M / ħ2 R’1 ) }2 ] * ∑∞ 𝑗=1 ( = (E’1 / ħ) * [ 1 / { (nπ / 2.M1 rs) – (GM1.M / ħ2 R’1 ) }2 ] * 𝑒 (𝐸

′ 1.𝑘0.𝑡2) ħ

E′ 1 . k0.t2 ħ

𝑗

) .(

i𝑗−1 𝑗!

* δj ………………(14)

Where δj = 1, -1, i or -i ; (δj ) = 1 ; if

j-1 = 4. b ,

b is a natural number

(δj ) = -1 ; if

j -1 = 2.b ,

b is a natural number

(δj ) = i

; if

j-1 = 1+4b , b is 0 or a natural number

(δj ) = -i ; if

j-1 = 3+4b , b is 0 or a natural number

By (06): E’1 = [nħ2π / 2.M1 rs ] - GM1.M / R’1 = ħ2 [nπ / 2.M1 rs ] - GM1.M / ħ2 .R’1 ] Thus { [nπ / 2.M1 rs ] - GM1.M / ħ2 .R’1 ] }2 = [ E’1 / ħ2 ]2 By (14): Δti = (E’1 / ħ)* [ ħ4 / ( E’1 )2 ] * 𝑒 (𝐸 Δti = [ ħ3 / E’1 ] * 𝑒 (𝐸

′ 1.𝑘0.𝑡2) ħ

′ 1.𝑘0.𝑡2) ħ

* δj

* δj

But for some k’ positive real number, [ ħ3 / E’1 ] * 𝑒 (𝐸 Thus Δti = 𝑒 (𝐸

′ 1.𝑘 ′′ .𝑡2) ħ

′ 1.𝑘0.𝑡2) ħ

= 𝑒 (𝐸

′ 1.𝑘0.𝑘 ′ 𝑡2) ħ

* δj …………………..(15) where k’’ = k’. k0

12

)

= 𝑒 (𝐸

′ 1.

𝑘′′

𝑡2 ) ħ

But [ ħ3 / E’1 ] = 𝑒 (𝐸

′ 1.𝑘0.𝑘 ′ 𝑡2) ħ

/ 𝑒 (𝐸

′ 1.𝑘0.𝑡2) ħ

= 𝑒 (𝐸

′ 1.𝑘0.𝑘 ′ 𝑡2)− (𝐸 ′ 1.𝑘0.𝑡2 ) ħ ħ

= 𝑒 (𝐸

′ 1.𝑘0.𝑡2 ) [𝑘 ′ −1] ħ

Thus E’1 > 0…………………………………..(15.1) Thus; [ ħ / ( E’1 . k0 . t2 ) ] * [ ln (ħ3 / E’1) ] + 1 = k’ ……………………….(16) And ln (ħ3 / E’1)ħ / (E’1. k0. t2) + 1 = k’ But k.ei [ (E1’/ ħ) ] t2 = e [ ( i [ (E1’/ ħ) ]. k0. t2 ] Thus k = e [ ( i [ (E1’/ ħ) ]. k0. t2 ] – i . [ (E1’/ ħ) ] t2 = e i . [ (E1’/ ħ) ] t2 [k0 - 1] Thus i . [ (E’1 / ħ) ] t2 .ln k + 1 = k0 ………………………..(17) By (16) and (17): k’ = [ ħ / [ ( E’1 . { i . [ (E’1 / ħ) ] t2 .ln k + 1 } . t2 ) ] * [ ln (ħ3 / E’1) ] + 1 But k’’ = k’. k0 = { [ ħ / [ ( E’1 . { i .[ (E’1 / ħ) ] t2 .ln k + 1 } . t2 ) ] * [ ln (ħ3 / E’1) ] + 1 } *{ i . [ (E’1 / ħ) ] t2 .ln k + 1 }

= [ ħ / (t2 E’1 ) ] * [ ln (ħ3 / E’1) ] + [ ( i . [ (E’1 / ħ) ] t2 .ln k ) + 1 ] Thus k’’ = [ ħ / (t2 E’1 ) ] * [ ln (ħ3 / E’1) ] + [ ( i . [ (E’1 / ħ) ] t2 .ln k ) + 1 ]………………..(18) By (15): Δti = 𝑒 (𝐸

′ 1.[ ħ / (t2

Δti = 𝑒 ( [ ln (ħ3 / E’1) ] ) * 𝑒

𝑡2 ħ

E’1 ) ] ∗ [ ln (ħ3 / E’1) ] . )

* 𝑒 (𝐸 𝑡2 ħ

i .[ E1′ . t2 / ħ)]^2 (ln k ) + E′1 .

′ 1.[ ( i .[ (E’1 / ħ) ] t2 .ln k

𝑡2 ħ

) + 1 ]. )

* δj

* δj

= (ħ3 / E’1 ) * eE1’. t2 / ħ * δj * ( eln k )i. [E’1. t2 / ħ]^2 Thus Δti = (ħ3 / E’1 ) * eE1’. t2 / ħ * δj * k i. [E’1. t2 / ħ]^2 here E’1 = [nħ2π / 2.M1 rs ] - GM1.M / R’1 real (Δti ) = (ħ3 / E’1 ) * eE1’. t2 / ħ * (-1)κ ; κ is a natural number. But E’1 = [nħ2π / 2.M1 rs ]*R’1 – [ GM1.M / R’1 ] e - E1’. t2 / ħ . Δti = e - E1’. Δti t=T Then

∫e t=0



. Δti =

(ħ3 / E’1 ). (-1)κ t=T

- E1’. Δti / ħ

. (Δti ) dt = (-1)κ * ħ3 t=0

13

∫ ( 1 / E’ ) dt 1

Where we consider T as the orbital time period of the particle P 1 (arbitrary taken from the solar wind particle soup) one complete oscillation, while moving towards the Black hole.



(- ħ / E’1 ). ( e - E1’. T / ħ – 1 ). [T – 0] - 1. (- ħ / E’1 ). ( e - E1’. t2 / ħ ). dt = (-1)κ * [ ħ3 / E’1 ] * T Thus (- ħ / E’1 ). ( e - E1’. T / ħ – 1 ). [T – 0] - (ħ / E’1)2.[ e - E1’. T / ħ – 1 ] = (-1)κ * [ ħ3 / E’1 ] * T But (ħ / E’1)2.[ e - E1’. T / ħ – 1 ] > 0. Thus (- ħ / E’1 ). ( e - E1’. T / ħ – 1 ). T > (-1)κ * [ ħ3 / E’1 ] * T Thus - ( e - E1’. T / ħ – 1 ) > (-1)κ * [ ħ2 ] But e - E1’. T / ħ < 1 . Thus [ 1 – (e - E1’. T / ħ) ] > 0. Thus [ 1 – (e - E1’. T / ħ) ] > (-1)κ * [ ħ2 ] ……………………………..(19) But the result (19) is valid for all κ natural number. Thus [ 1 – (e - E1’. T / ħ) ] > ħ2 Thus e - E1’. T / ħ < 1 – ħ2 . But ( 1 – ħ2 ) < e- 2 . Thus e - E1’. T / ħ < e-2 . Thus T > ( 2 ħ / E’1 ) Thus f < ( E’1 / 2.ħ ) …………………………….(20) Where f is the frequency of oscillation of the particle that has been released from the solar wind. Here T is the Orbital Time period for one complete oscillation, while moving towards the Black hole. Here f is the frequency of electromagnetic waves emits by the solar wind particle (that is accelerating towards the black hole). But here, [nħ2π / 2.M1 rs ] - GM1.M / R’1 = E’1 . By (20): f < [ nħ.π / 4.M1 rs ] – [ GM1.M / 2.ħ R’1 ] ……………………..(21) Here f is the frequency of electromagnetic waves emits by the solar wind particle (that is accelerating towards the supermassive black hole). Here R’1 = r1 . rs / (r1 - rs) But 1 / [ 2.ħ. R’1 ] = (r1 - rs) / (2.ħ. r1. rs). But rs = 2GM / c2 . Where M is the mass of the super massive black hole. c is the speed of light in vacuum. G is the Newton’s universal gravitational constant. 14

Then 1 / [ 2.ħ. R’1 ] = (r1 - rs) / (2.ħ. r1. rs) = ( r1 - 2GM / c2 ) / (2.ħ. r1 . 2GM / c2 ) = [ r1 .c2 - 2GM ] / [ 4. ħ. G. M. r1 ] . Then [ GM1.M / 2.ħ R’1 ] = ( [G.M1. M ]* [ r1 .c2 - 2GM ] ) / [ 4. ħ. G. M. r1 ] = M1 * ( r1 .c2 - 2GM ) / 4. ħ. r1 But ( r1 - rs ) > 0. Thus r1 – 2GM / c2 = r1. c2 – 2GM / c2 > 0. Thus = ( r1. c2 – 2GM ) > 0. Thus M1 * ( r1 .c2 - 2GM ) / 4. ħ. r1 > - 2.G.M.M1 / 4.ħ. r1 = - G.M.M1 / 2.ħ. r1 Thus by (21): f < [ nħ.π / 4.M1 rs ] – [ GM1.M / 2.ħ R’1 ] < [ nħ.π / 4.M1 rs ] – [G.M.M1 / 2.ħ. r1 ] Thus f < [ nħ.π / 4.M1 rs ] – [ G.M.M1 / 2.ħ. r1 ] ……………………………(22) ; where n is a natural number But the usual mass of a Supermassive black hole is M = (1.989 × 1030 * 16 * 109 ) = 31.824 * 1039 kg But rs = 2GM / c2 = 2 * 6.754 × 10−11 * 31.824 * 1039 / (2.998 * 108 )2 = 47.82 * 1012 meters Then by (22) , ( f ) < [ nħ.π / 4.M1 rs ] - [ G.M.M1 / 2.ħ. r1 ] < [ nħ.π / 4.M1 rs ] But we know that the solar wind mostly consists of mostly electrons, protons and alpha particles. Case 1 (Consider P1 as an electron) Then M1 = 9.11 * 10-31 kg . Then by (22): f < n * 6.63 * 10-34 * 3.142 / ( 4* 9.11 * 10-31 * 1.89 * 1022 ) for all n natural number. Then [ n * 6.63 * 10-34 * 3.142 / ( 4* 9.11 * 10-31 * 1.89 * 1022 ) ]min = 6.63 * 10-34 * 3.142 / ( 4* 9.11 * 10-31 * 1.89 * 1022 ) = 0.302 * 10-25 . Thus f < 0.302 * 10-25 Hz . But the minimum frequency of a photon that is possible is greater than 0.302 * 10-25 Hz .

15

Case 2 (Consider P1 as a proton) Then M1 = 1.67 * 10-27 kg . Then by (22): f < n * 6.63 * 10-34 * 3.142 / ( 4* 1.67 * 10-27 * 1.89 * 1022 ) for all n natural number. Then [ n * 6.63 * 10-34 * 3.142 / ( 4* 1.67 * 10-27 * 1.89 * 1022 ) ]min = 6.63 * 10-34 * 3.142 / ( 4* 1.67 * 10-27 * 1.89 * 1022 ) = 1.65 * 10-29 . Thus f < 1.65 * 10-29 Hz . But the minimum frequency of a photon that is possible is greater than 1.65 * 10-29 Hz . Case 3 (Consider P1 as an alpha particle) Then M1 = 1.65 * 10-27 kg . Then by (22): f < n * 6.63 * 10-34 * 3.142 / ( 4* 1.65 * 10-27 * 1.89 * 1022 ) for all n natural number. Then [ n * 6.63 * 10-34 * 3.142 / ( 4* 1.65 * 10-27 * 1.89 * 1022 ) ]min = 6.63 * 10-34 * 3.142 / ( 4* 1.65 * 10-27 * 1.89 * 1022 ) = 1.67 * 10-29 . Thus f < 1.67 * 10-29 Hz . But the minimum frequency of a photon that is possible is greater than 1.67 * 10-29 Hz . Thus for all cases 1 , 2 , 3 ; P1 particle cannot emit EM radiations anyway under the previously conditions. Therefore the particles of solar wind, those move towards the supermassive black hole do not emit any electromagnetic radiations to the outer space………………………..(23)

16

Section 2 : How the supermassive black hole controls the orbiting velocity of nearby stars/planets According to the well-known knowledge, GMM’ / r2 = M’ .V2 / r M = mass of the supermassive black hole according to planet’s reference frame M’ = mass of the considering planet according to planet’s reference frame r (t) = the distance between supermassive black hole and the planet at time ‘t’ according to the planet’s reference frame V = the orbiting linear velocity of the planet around the central object Then V = √ (GM / r) ……………………………………………(24) But the equation (24) is valid only according to classical physics theories. We know that there is a magnetic field that is spreading from the supermassive black hole’s magnetic axis, towards the space. But usually there is another magnetic field that is due to the magnetic field of the planet (which orbits around the black hole).Also there are some other magnetic fields that is existing in that system. Those are the magnetic fields due to the magnetic fields of other planets/stars near to the considering main planet. Then there is a magnetic attraction/repulsion among those magnetic fields. Depending on the direction of the considering main planet’s magnetic axis and the total equivalent magnetic axis of rest of the matters nearby to the main planet, the velocity of the main planet (A1) changes. Then let’s try to find the total equivalent magnetic force (F1) that acts on A1 (due to the total magnetic field because of the black hole and the magnetic fields of rest of other planets/stars nearby to A1) as below. F1 = ( πμ0 / 4 )* (M1. M2. R1 2 . R22 ) * [

1 𝑥2

1

1

1

+ (𝑥+𝐿1+𝐿2)2 − (𝑥+𝐿1)2 − (𝑥+𝐿2)2 ]……………(25)

μ0 is the permeability of space, which equals to 4π*10−7 T·m/A M1 , M2 identified as the magnetization of the magnet in A1 and the magnetization of the total equivalent magnet of the host planets/black hole respectively (the virtual magnets which produced by the magnetic field of the black hole/ host planets of A1) 17

x is the distance between the two virtual magnets in meters (in the black hole/nearby planets/ nearby stars) - identified as the distance between magnet in A1 and the equivalent magnet of the host planets/ black hole. R1 , R2 are the radiuses of two magnets in meters - identified as the radius of the magnet in A1 and the radius of the total equivalent magnet of the host planets/black hole respectively (the virtual magnets which produced by the magnetic field of the black hole/ host planets of A1) L1 , L2 are the lengths of two magnets in meters- identified as the lengths of the magnet in A1 and the length of the total equivalent magnet of the host planets/black hole respectively (the virtual magnets which produced by the magnetic field of the black hole/host planets of A1). But we know that the magnetization of A1 ( = M1 ) < magnetization of the supermassive black hole/host planets (= M2 ). And radius of the magnet in A1 (virtual magnet that causes A1 ‘s magnetic field) (= R1) < radius of the total equivalent magnet of the host planets/supermassive black hole (= R2) Thus by (25): F1 < ( M1. M2. R1 2 . R22 ) < ( M2 . R2 )2 . Thus F1 < ( M2 . R2 )2 ………….(26) Here R2 is also a vector. But the gravitational force acting on A1 , due to other host planets and host star of it (F2) at time t = GmM’ / L2 (t)_ Here L (t) is the distance between A1 and the gravitational center of the host planets and the host star of A1 at time t. m is the total mass of the of the host planets and the host star of A1. The gravitational force acting on A1 due to the supermassive black hole (F3) (supermassive black hole has located at the center of the galaxy which the A1 has located) = GMM’ / r2 (t)_ Here r(t) is the distance between A1 and the supermassive black hole at time t. Here L2 (t)_ means that L2 (t) is a vector. And r2 (t)_ means r2 (t) is a vector. Then the projection of F2 on the direction of F1 = GmM’ / L2 (t). cos θ And the projection of F3 on the direction of F1 = GMM’ / r2 (t). cos ϕ

18

Here θ is the angle between the direction of F1 and F2 and ϕ is the angle between the direction of F3 and F1 . But A1 is orbiting around its host star. As well as A1 and its solar system is revolving around the supermassive black hole (Supermassive black hole is at the center of the galaxy which A1 has located). Then let F4 is the total centrifugal force acting on A1 . Then F4 = M’. V0 / D2 The projection of F4 on the direction of F1 = [ M’. ( V0 / D2 ) .cos δ ] for some V0 and D. Here δ is the angle between the direction of F1 and F4 . Here V0 is the total equivalent linear velocity of A1 (along the direction which is perpendicular to the total centrifugal force acting direction at time t). And D is the distance between A1 and total centrifugal force acting center. Thus total external force acting on A1 (due to the supermassive black hole/host objects) at time t = F = F1 + F2 + F3 - F4 (Because the total centrifugal force acting in the opposite direction of rest of the forces acting on A1). = F1 + GmM’ / L2 (t). cos θ + GMM’ / r2(t). cos ϕ - [ ( M’. V0 / D2 ).cos δ ] But A1 is stable in the system at time t. Thus F = 0. Thus F1 + GmM’ / L2 (t). cos θ + GMM’ / r2(t). cos ϕ - [ ( M’. V0 / D2 ).cos δ ] = 0. Thus F1 + GmM’ / L2 (t). cos θ + GMM’ / r2(t). cos ϕ = [ ( M’. V0 / D2 ).cos δ ] ……………..(27) By (25): F1 = ( πμ0 / 4 )* (M1. M2. R1 2 . R22 ) * [ 1

1 𝑥2

1

1

1

+ (𝑥+𝐿1+𝐿2)2 − (𝑥+𝐿1)2 − (𝑥+𝐿2)2 ]

1

1

Consider 𝑥 2 + ( 𝑥+𝐿1+𝐿2)2 = [ 2𝑥 2 + (𝐿1)2 + (𝐿2)2 + 2. 𝐿1. 𝐿2 + 2 𝑥. 𝐿1 + 2. 𝑥. 𝐿2 ] 𝑥 2 (𝑥+𝐿1+𝐿2)2 1 1 1 2 2 2 (𝐿1) (𝐿2) + = [ 2𝑥 + + + 2𝐿1. 𝑥 + 2. 𝐿2. 𝑥 ] (𝑥 + 𝐿1)2 (𝑥 + 𝐿2)2 (𝑥 + 𝐿1)2 . (𝑥 + 𝐿2)2 But 𝑥 2 (𝑥 + 𝐿1 + 𝐿2)2 = x2 [ x2 + L21 + L2 2 + 2.L1 . L2 + 2x. L1 + 2x.L2 ] = x4 + x2 L21 + x2 L2 2 + 2.x2 L1.L2 + 2x3. L1 + 2x3 L2 And (𝑥 + 𝐿1)2 . (𝑥 + 𝐿2)2 = (x2 + L21 + 2.x. L1 )* (x2 + L22 + 2.x. L2)

19

Thus obviously, 𝑥 2 (𝑥 + 𝐿1 + 𝐿2)2 < (𝑥 + 𝐿1)2 . (𝑥 + 𝐿2)2 Thus obviously

1 𝑥2

1

+ ( 𝑥+𝐿1+𝐿2)2 >

1 (𝑥+𝐿1)2

+

1 (𝑥+𝐿2)2

Thus by (25), F1 > 0. By (27):

GMM’ / r2(t). cos ϕ < [ ( M’. V0 / D2 ).cos δ ] < ( M’. V0 / D2 )

Thus GM * [ D / r ]2 * [cos ϕ] < V0 GM * [ cos ϕ / r2 ] < GM * [ D / r ]2 * [cos ϕ] < V0 Thus GM * [ cos ϕ / r2 ] < V0 ………………………………….(28) By (27): F1 + GmM’ / L2 (t). cos θ + GMM’ / r2(t). cos ϕ = [ ( M’. V0 / D2 ).cos δ ] F1 + GmM’ / L2 (t). cos θ + GMM’ / r2(t). cos ϕ < F1 + GmM’/ L2 (t) + GMM’ Thus ( M’. V0 / D2 ).cos δ < F1 + GmM’/ L2 (t) + GMM’ V0 < { (D2 / M’ ). F1 + Gm* [ D2 / L(t) ] + G.M. D2 } / cos δ < { ( D2. F1 ) + Gm* [ D2 / L(t) ] + G.M. D2 } / cos δ = D2 [ F1 + (Gm / L (t)) + GM ] / cos δ Thus V0 < D2 [ F1 + (Gm / L (t)) + GM ] / cos δ ………………………(29) By (28) and (29): GM * [ cos ϕ / r2 ] < V0 < D2 [ F1 + (Gm / L (t)) + GM ] / cos δ ……..(30) Here V0 is the total equivalent linear velocity of A1 along its path of orbiting, M is the mass of the supermassive black hole, D is the distance between A1 and total centrifugal force acting center, r(t) is the distance between A1 and the supermassive black hole at time t, F1 is the total equivalent magnetic force that acts on A1 , m is the total mass of the of the host planets and the host star of A1 , L (t) is the distance between A1 and the gravitational center of the host planets and the host star of A1 at time t, ϕ is the angle between the direction of F3 and F1 , δ is the angle between the direction of F1 and F4 .

20

Result Evaluation

According to (23): the particles of solar wind, those move towards the supermassive black hole do not emit any electromagnetic radiations to the outer space. Therefore the nearby area of a supermassive black hole is also dark rather than the region of the supermassive black hole.

According to (30): GM * [ cos ϕ / r2 ] < V0 < D2 [ F1 + (Gm / L (t)) + GM ] / cos δ That implies that there is a range for the total equivalent linear velocity of a planet that along its path of orbiting. And that limit of the linear velocity depends on the mass of the host supermassive black hole as well.

Discussion There are particles those eject by the solar surface (as the particles of the solar wind) and when those particles accelerate towards the supermassive black hole, those solar wind particles cannot emit any electromagnetic radiations to the outer space. Therefore no one can see those solar wind particles in the sky those are accelerating towards the supermassive black hole. And there is a range for the orbital velocity of a planet if that planet is considerably influenced by a supermassive black hole.

Conclusion Charged particles those are accelerating towards a supermassive black hole cannot emit any electromagnetic wave. Therefore the nearby area of a supermassive black hole is dark and cannot observe directly. Moreover, there is a range for the orbital velocity of a planet that is orbiting around a star under the influence of a supermassive black hole. Therefore we can apply this mathematical method to explain more observations in astrophysics/cosmology and in physics as well. 21

References 

Wikipedia Magnetic Field, Last modified on 31 January 2018

Retrieved from: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnetic_field 

Wikipedia Solar Wind, Last modified on 13 January 2018

Retrieved from: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solar_wind 

The production of EM waves

Retrieved from: http://labman.phys.utk.edu/phys222core/modules/m6/production_of_em_waves.html 

Wikipedia Super massive black hole, Last modified on 03 February 2018

Retrieved from: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supermassive_black_hole 

Wikipedia Force between magnets, Last modified on 04 February 2018

Retrieved from: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Force_between_magnets 

Wikipedia Magnetization, Last modified on 14 December 2017

Retrieved from: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnetization

Appendix The magnetic force (F1) that acts on a planet can be written as below (When there is an own magnetic field with the planet and by considering the magnetic fields of the host black hole and with the magnetic field of the host planets): F1 = ( πμ0 / 4 )* (M1. M2. R1 2 . R22 ) * [

1 𝑥2

1

1

1

+ (𝑥+𝐿1+𝐿2)2 − (𝑥+𝐿1)2 − (𝑥+𝐿2)2 ]……………(25)

μ0 is the permeability of space, which equals to 4π*10−7 T·m/A

22

M1 , M2 identified as the magnetization of the magnet in A1 and the magnetization of the total equivalent magnet of the host planets/black hole respectively (the virtual magnets which produced by the magnetic field of the black hole/ host planets of A1) x is the distance between the two virtual magnets in meters (in the black hole/nearby planets/ nearby stars) - identified as the distance between magnet in A1 and the equivalent magnet of the host planets/ black hole. R1 , R2 are the radiuses of two magnets in meters - identified as the radius of the magnet in A1 and the radius of the total equivalent magnet of the host planets/black hole respectively (the virtual magnets which produced by the magnetic field of the black hole/ host planets of A1) L1 , L2 are the lengths of two magnets in meters- identified as the lengths of the magnet in A1 and the length of the total equivalent magnet of the host planets/black hole respectively (the virtual magnets which produced by the magnetic field of the black hole/host planets of A1).

23