Central Japan Triple Junction revisited - Wiley Online Library

7 downloads 0 Views 619KB Size Report
boundaries meet, taking as an example the only one on earth at the present time, in central Japan. In this area, the Pacific,. Philippine. Sea, and Eurasian. (PAC ...
TECTONICS,VOL. 6, NO. 1, PAGES35-45, FEBRUARY 1987

CENTRAL

Xavier

JAPAN

TRIPLE

JUNCTION

REVISITED

Le Pichon and Philippe

D•partement Sup•rieure,

Abstract.

de G•ologie, Paris, France

We

dimensional

show

Huchon Ecole

that

kinematic

Normale

the

two-

discussion

of

McKenzie and Morgan's TTT-type triple junction is not sufficient, as it ignores the interaction of the sinking plates. We derive

a

dimensional

junctions

relation

for

existence

and show that

of

it

TTT does not change (is stable) or cVA//bc (Figure 1, inset).

the

three-

present

situation

TTT

triple

evolve

to

is satisfied

at

the unstable central Japan triple junction. We then use the geometry of the subducting Pacific plate beneath the Philippine Sea and Eurasian plates to show that the present situation did not hold before about 3 Ma. Before that time, the triple junction was probably located north of the present one and very close to the pole of relative motion. Finally, we discuss the geological implications of this

plate boundaries intersect in TTT (Figure 1). They showed that the geometrical configuration of the plate boundaries at

model.

INTRODUCTION

McKenzie and Morgan [1969]

first

discussed the evolution of triple junctions where three consuming plate boundaries meet, taking as an example the only one on earth at the present time, in central Japan. In this area, the Pacific, Philippine Sea, and Eurasian (PAC, PHS, and EUR hereafter, respectively) consuming

a

is

if ab//ac Thus, the

unstable

different

one

and should as

Paper

Union.

number 6TO258.

0278-7407/87/006T-0258510.00

been

this paper, we show that a kinematic discussion in the plane tangent to the earth in TTT is not sufficient, as it ignores the three-dimensional (3-D) interaction of the sinking plates. We use simple geometrical considerations to deduce

an

existence

condition

for

such

a

TTT. Before applying this condition to the geometry of the central Japan triple junction, we briefly discuss the kinematics of the Philippine Sea plate. Because the motion along the Sagami trough is nearly transform (boundary (a,c) in Figure 1), the triple junction is nearly a TTF-type triple junction. Then, we will show that although the existence condition is satisfied, the present situation did not

hold

before

about

3 Ma

and

previously, the triple junction probably located further north, very

to the PHS/EUR pole of relative Copyright 1987 by the American Geophysical

has

discussed by Fitch and Scholtz [1971], Matsubara and Seno [1980], and most notablyby Senoand Maruyama[1984]. In

THREE-DIMENSIoNAL

GEOMETRICAL

The two-dimensional

(2-D)

that,

was close

motion.

DISCUSSION

discussion

of

McKenzieand Morgan[1969] concernsthe

36

Le Pichon and Huchon: Central

135'

Japan Triple

Junction

145 ø

140 ø

45 o

EUR • M

PAC I

40ø

I

/ / !

•. ø

c)

/ ! / / ! EURASIAN / / I•,

--

// Kashima selmount

35 o

Triple junction

N • % \ \\ \ \ PHILIPPINE SEA \ • • PLATE

•,c•



-TT tb,c)

•5 e

Fig. 1. General geodynamic context of central Japan triple lines are isobaths (in kilometers) of the descending Pacific

and Hasegawa[1982] relative

triple

velocity

junction. Contour plate after Umino

and T. Maki (personal communication,1985). Arrows:

vectors

(scaled values:

see text).

Right inset:

TTT(a)-type

junction configuration of McKenzieandMorgan[1969]. (a,b): boundary

between plates A and B, and similarly for (a,c) and (b,c). A, Eurasia; B, Pacific; C, Philippine Sea; PHS/EU and PHS/HS, poles of rotation of PHS

with respectto EUCHuchon, 1986]and to hot spotscomputed fromHuchon E1986] and CoxandEngebretson [1985]. Left inset: velocity triangle at central Japan triple

junction

(34.5øN, 142øE). PAC/EURis computed from Minster and Jordan's

[1978] parameters. The position of PHSin the triangle is given for the

following parameters: H[Huchon, 1986], KS•arig, 19;]5!, MEMinster and

Jordan, 1979], R [Rankenet al., 1984] and [Seno, 197 Note that K and R producedivergenceat the triple junction (see discussionby Huchon,[1986]).

Le Pichon and Huchon: Central

Japan Triple

geometric stability of TTT triple junctions. A stable triple junction keeps the same geometric configuration through time, whereas an unstable one changes to another configuration. However, if trenches are involved in the triple junctions, some configurations are impossible because of geometric interference from the sinking plates. Thus, another condition should be met in order to avoid this space problem. We call it

the 3-D existence condition. If all three subductions have

the

same

polarity (case TTT(b) of McKenzie and Morgan), such a triple junction can exist because the sinking plates do not interfere. If both polarities exist (case TTT(a) of McKenzie and Morgan), interference between plates may arise unless

a

is met.

In the following,

certain

3-D that

existence

condition.

Note

independent conditions

of the of McKenzie

applies to stable configurations. An

obvious

of a TTT(a)

cVA

condition

is

as

to

unstable

triple

for

junction

the

existence

is that

vector

is to the west of boundary (a,b)

and

that consequently• > O (see Figure 2). If • = 8, the triple junction is stable. If 0 < • < 8, the triple junction migrates along boundary (a,c) . If • > 8, it migrates Let

plate

the

of

plate

A

C is

ZC - (y cos ¾ - x sin ¾) tan e + P Along vector L, ZB - ZC. Assuming the same trench (a,c),

depth

along

boundaries

(a,b)

and

x tan • - ( y cos ¾ - x sin ¾) tan • The

coordinates -

cos

of

¾ tan

vector

L are



y - tan • + sin ¾ tan • z -

tan



tan



cos

¾

To obtain

the corresponding

relative

motion

axis (a,c) computations,

.

direction

in the horizontal L by an angle

of

plane,

e about

the

After some numerical one obtains the coordinates

of the rotated vector LH (see Figure 2) x'

- sin • cos ¾ + tan • sin ¾ cos ¾ (cos

y'

- sin • sin ¾

z'

-0



-

1 )

+ tan a sin 2 ¾ (cos • - 1) + tan •

along boundary (b,c). us now consider

bottom

where P is the depth at the trench axis. The depth to the bottom of plate A above

one must rotate

condition

the

ZB - x tan s + P

x

this

2-D stability and Morgan and

as well

C. The depth to above plate B is

condition

we derive this

Junction

general

case

where • > O. The existence condition must be

discussed

in

the

instantaneous

domain

because the vector LH is in the horizontal

because, except for the case where • -8,

plane.

the geometric configuration changes through time. The existence condition is that the subduction vector, originating at material triple point O in plate C be such that it still lies above plate B. Consider Figure 2, where the origin O is taken at the triple junction and where

motion is defined by angle • (Figure 2) such that tan •> x'/y'. Thus

The critical

direction

of

relative

tan• >cos ¾/ [sin¾+tan,•5 (sin e + tan • sin ¾ (cos •-

which is direction

the

of

critical relative

condition motion

for

1))

the with

Oy coincides with consuming boundary (ab). The coordinate system is orthonormal and direct, with the z axis positive downward. Working near the triple junction, we neglect changes in dips of plates along the boundaries. We also neglect differences in depths of trenches. Let • be the dip of the sinking plate B and e the dip of the sinking plate C. Let ¾ be the angle (ac, Ox) (counted positive clockwise from Ox). From figure 2, where

configuration is not stable. If • > 8, the triple junction migrates along (a,c) and,

we also

as can be seen in

show isodepth

lines

of the

bottom

of plate A, cVA cannot be closer to the y axis than the vector L, which is the intersection between subduction planes limiting

plates

A and B, and plates

A and

geometrical

parameters •,

•,

and ¾.

Note that, if 8 = •, the configuration is

stable,

in

the

sense

of McKenzie

and

Morgan•1969], and the above inequality should

exist.

be met for

this

configuration

This case is discussed further

to

by

Hamano •1986]. In

the

general

case,

Figure

however,

3a,

point

the

T J1

subducts during an interval of time It l, t2] along line TJ1-P, whichis parallel to the motion vector in the subducted portion of plate C (line L of Figure 2). No point

]8

Le Pichon and Huchon: Central

Japan Triple

Junction

Before discussing the application of this condition to the actual centra! Japan triple junction, we briefly discuss the present kinematics.

Y

PRESENT

KINEMATICS

CENTRAL

JAPAN

Although

AROUND

TRIPLE

the

THE

JUNCTION

data

set

used

for

the

determination is essentially the same, the parameters of rotation of the PHS plate vary widely according to various authors.

(a,c)

SenoE1977] andMinster andJordanE1979] located

Y

the pole of rotation

far

away from

(b,c) Fig. 2. Reference frame used for the computations (see text). Here ,• and e are the dip angles of plates A and C, respective ly.

of the subducted (a,b) than line existence

condition

plate C is TJ1-P so is

valid

in

closer that the

TJ1

TJ2

to our

finite

time domain. Physically, however, the previous discussion is not entirely valid because it assumes that, during the migration of the triple junction along (a,c), plate B immediately develops a scissor-type fault along segment TJ1-TJ2, which is probably unrealistic.

If

O < • < •,

migrates that

in

our

the

the triple

along (b,c), existence

finite

time

domain.

is

3b shows

also

However,

are again some significant problems because the previous

1

junction

and Figure

condition

2

TJ2

valid

there

physical discussion

assumes the existence of a bend along TJ1-P in the sinking plate C, as portion TJ1-TJ2-P of the sinking plate C does not have the same dip as the remaining part of the sinking plate C. To summarize, we have demonstrated that the previous inequality is the general existence condition for a TTT(a)-type triple junction in three dimensions,

although the idealized geometric cases raise significant physical problems. This

TJ1

0