Challenge Background Methods Results

2 downloads 0 Views 2MB Size Report
artefacts from the robotic components and vibrations have to be suppressed. Challenge. Positioning and Stabilization of a minimally invasive Laser Osteotome.
Positioning and Stabilization of a minimally invasive Laser Osteotome Manuela Eugster1, Philippe C. Cattin3, Azhar Zam2, Georg Rauter1 1BIROMED-Lab, 2BLOG, 3CIAN, all from the Dept. of Biomedical Engineering, University of Basel

Background

Challenge

Goal: Replacing conventional mechanical bone cutting tools by a robotic laser endoscope while changing the setup from an open surgery to minimally invasive surgery.

System Setup: The robotic endoscope 1 is guided by a serial robot 2 . The endeffector 3 at the tip of the endoscope contains the laser optics and the laser beam exits the end-effector perpendicular to the bone.

First Application: Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty…

3 A

D

1 R

2

D

[1]

… is a surgical treatment for unicompartmental osteoarthritis. Nowadays, bone resection is executed using surgical instruments such as oscillating saws and drills.

Compared with mechanical tools, Laser Osteotomy provides… • • • •

Faster bone healing[2],[3] Cutting with higher precision[4] and good depth control Higher flexibility in the planar ablation geometry[4] Smaller cut width

D

Main Challenges: Accuracy: The positioning and stabilization of the end-effector requires high accuracy A (0.25 ) in order to enable a good performance of the laserosteotome for enabling continuous cuts through point-wise ablation (laser diameter 0.5mm). R Registration: The relative pose between the laser optics and the bone surface has to be determined in order to enable cutting at the desired location.

Combining Laser Osteotomy with a robotic tool for minimally invasive surgery allows… • • • •

Smaller incisions → faster healing and less damage Precise cutting-geometry and depth Improved planning → more possibilities and increased coherence A less extensive tool assortment in the operational theatre

D

Disturbance compensation: Several disturbances such as patient motion, movement artefacts from the robotic components and vibrations have to be suppressed.

Methods

Results

Concept: A bone-attached six bar mechanism with integrated actuation for positioning. Robotic Endoscope

Patella

2 1

Design Synthesis: An exhaustive search algorithm was used to find the optimal design parameters of the mechanism which correspond to the maximal workspace.

Actuation: Femur

max

Sliders Linear rails Legs Rotatory joints Anchoring point

, ,

,

s.t. :

Laser

3

,r,

,

Laser

Bowden cable Pre-tension spring Tibia

[EP 17177760.0]

This bone-attached mechanism is a six bar mechanism. The main components are: the body of the end-effector 1 and two legs 2 on each side. Additionally, the legs on each side are connected to a respective anchoring point 3 which is rigidly fixed on the bone surface and which is building the base of the mechanism. Mobility: When fixed to the base, the mechanism can move in the plane with 3 degrees of freedom. During insertion and retraction the legs can be folded away, making the mechanism suitable for minimally invasive surgery. 3

Parameter Leg length

Unit mm

Lower limit

Upper limit

Rail length Rail distance Anchoring distance

mm mm mm

15 4 15

35 15

Outcome: • Optimal parameters: , , • Reachable workspace: • Cut length: 30 / 40

2⋅

, 1.5 ⋅ Footprint 40

First Prototypes:

Insertion and Retraction

Rotation around z-axis

Translation along x-axis

1

Translation along y-axis

3

35

x

2

y

z

Decoupling: When fixed to the bone, the end-effector can be decoupled from the robotic → For example by releasing endoscope and move on its own.

1

2

115

the tension of the tendon-driven links

End-effector Laser

Robotic Endoscope Bone Surface

Decouple

3:1 Prototype

1:1 Prototype

References [1] [2] [3] [4]

[Online]. Available: http://pennstatehershey.adam.com/content.aspx?productId=115&pid=3&gid=100225, [Accessed: 31 Aug- 2016] Baek, K.-W et al., “A comparative investigation of bone surface after cutting with mechanical tools a3nd Er: YAG laser”, Lasers in surgery and medicine, 47, 426-432, Rajitha Gunaratne, G. D., et al. ,“A review of the physiological and histological effects of laser osteotomy”, Journal of Medical Engineering & Technology, 41.1, 1-12, 2017 Baek, K.-W et al., “Clinical applicability of robot-guided contact-free laser osteotomy in cranio-maxillo-facial surgery: in-vitro simulation and in-vivo surgery in minipig mandibles”, British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 53, 976-98, 2015 [5] Eugster et al., “Positioning and Stabilisation of a Minimally Invasive Laser Osteotome”, The Hamlyn Symposium on Medical Robotics, 10, 21-22, 2017

Funding Werner Siemens-Foundation, Zug, Switzerland

[email protected]