Chapter 14
Working with Students who have Basic Skills Needs in Transfer Courses: Completing the Building Part II Primary Authors: Marcy Alancraig, Cabrillo College (faculty) Janet Fulks, Bakersfield College (faculty) With gratitude for contributions from: Joan Córdova, Orange Coast College (faculty) Joel Levine, Southwestern College (faculty) Dianne McKay, Mission College (faculty) Martine Shelley, Sierra College (faculty) Sierra College ESL faculty
1
Chapter 14
Working with Students who have Basic Skills Needs in Transfer Courses: Completing the Building Part II Picture this: You’ve just received the first set of assignments for your transfer level class. Quickly, you skim them over. The first few make you smile – oh good, they got it! Then you look at the next. This student really missed the boat. You quickly thumb through the rest. Oh dear. Some students have done great work, but others seem not to have even addressed the assignment. Some of the writing is difficult to comprehend; you can’t understand what some students are trying to say. The assignment is without structure and where, oh where, is the critical thinking? Or perhaps the student has misinterpreted or ignored data. Some of the mathematics, requiring elementary skills that students should have mastered before ever walking through the door of your classroom, is incorrect. You put the set of papers down on your desk with a sigh. What the heck is going on here? This chapter is written by two faculty that teach transfer level courses. One of us teaches a course where assessment tests place students into the course or the students have passed up to two prerequisite courses, the other has three pre-requisites before students can enter the course. In both cases, we have found that we have students with basic skills needs. In other general education classes, where there are no prerequisites or co-requisites for reading, English or mathematics, the percentage of students with basic skills needs is even higher. Here are the facts from the Chancellor’s Office’s Report on Basic Skills: 1. 70-85% of all California community college students assess into some sort of basic skills class when they first enter our institutions.
2. Only 27.3% of them actually enroll in basic skill level classes. 3. Where are the rest of the students that assessed into a basic skills course?
They are sitting in your classroom, wrestling with the transfer-level material that you teach and struggling mightily to succeed. They may or may not have been the students who completed the Chapter 14
2
assignments that you find so disturbing in your pile – the poorly written ones, the ones with misused vocabulary or incorrect basic mathematics. They may or may not be the students who seemed to completely misunderstand the task. How can you know whether they need help with basic skills issues or if they failed because they simply blew off the assignment? Most importantly, if they do need help, what can you do about it? This chapter is written for transfer faculty who have students with basic skills needs in their classroom. Based on the statistics listed above, that’s ALL of us. Though the carefully constructed pre-requisites for transfer courses should ensure that students with developmental needs get them met before encountering the complex material that you teach, we know that this is not always the case. Perhaps your class doesn’t have any pre-requisites, or they are only advisory, and students ignore them. Or maybe your course only requires the most basic of reading and mathematics skills, yet to truly master its subject at college level, the student needs more. In this chapter you’ll find some suggestions for easy early assessments that you can do in the first couple of weeks of the semester to discover who has learning needs. Better yet, the chapter also contains some techniques that you can use to help developmental students master the discipline that you teach. In fact, these techniques work well for all students and are simple enough that you can use them tomorrow in class if you like. An important factor that will influence all of our students is the Fall 2009 implementation of the increased graduation requirements for California community colleges. The section of primary relevance to English and mathematics graduation requirements reads: "Effective for all students admitted to a community college for the Fall 2009 term or any term thereafter, competence in mathematics shall be demonstrated by obtaining a satisfactory grade in a mathematics course at the level of the course typically known as intermediate algebra (either intermediate algebra or another mathematics course at the same level, with the same rigor and with elementary algebra as a prerequisite, approved locally) or by completing an assessment conducted pursuant to subchapter 6 of this chapter (commencing with section 55500) and achieving a score determined to be comparable to satisfactory completion of the specified mathematics course” (Basic Skills Initiative Website). Further information specific to courses and Title 5 changes are available at http://www.cccbsi.org/resources. So let’s go back to the scenario that began the chapter, but this time let’s make it real. Think back to a recent assignment in your own class. How did your students do? Did any perform poorly? Why? What do you think caused the weak performance? We do not want to oversimplify this; we know there will be a complexity of reasons. Can you list, from your experience, what they might be? Fill in the concept map on the next page with potential causes that may have led to why the majority of the students missed the mark on the assignment. You may add more circles with potential reasons if you need them.
Chapter 14
3
Factors based on deficient writing skills
Factors based on deficient math skills
Poor Student Performance on an Assignment
Factors based on deficient reading skills
Factors based on deficient study skills
Now, let’s sort the factors out. List them again, but this time, divide them into two groups 1. The factors you or your institution have some potential to change or affect 2. The factors which are beyond your ability or the college’s to shift
Factors that can be Addressed
Factors that are Impossible to Effect
.
If your list of the impossible is long, don’t give up hope. We believe there may be information in this chapter that will help you to move some of them to the other list. Chapter 14
4
But First, Assessing Your Attitude Before we dive into the specific solutions to this issue, it’s important to know how you feel about it. Many transfer faculty are troubled by the increasing number of students with developmental needs in their courses and react in various ways to this challenging situation. In fact, we’ve found that Dr. Elizabeth Kübler-Ross’ five stages of grief can be adapted to describe the range of faculty responses to student lack of preparedness. For some reason, when we mention Kübler-Ross, people always laugh. But perhaps it’s laughter at a truth that isn’t always acknowledged. Things have changed in the community college system, and change often leads to grief. As transfer faculty who have worked hard on this issue, we’ve found that this grief has to be acknowledged before it can transform into something else. So where are you at this moment? We know that your feelings may change from day to day, class to class, assignment to assignment. And there’s no right way to respond, no feeling that you should have about all of this. Each of us has probably felt every specific stage at one moment or another. Read the sample thoughts below, some of which are exaggerated and written tongue-incheek to make the point. Circle the one group that best captures how you feel today.
Denial
I don’t have any developmental students in my transfer classes. The pre-requisites take care of that, and the ones who aren’t prepared simply fail. It’s just not my problem. I became a higher education professor to teach college, not high school, so someone else needs to deal with this, All I want is for the problem to be fixed. Isn’t that why we have basic skills specialists at my school, plus a reading and ESL department? It’s their job and not mine.
Anger
What is wrong with students today? Why can’t they do the work? I labor so hard for the class, and they don’t respect my efforts. They don’t even know the basics. What is wrong with the faculty teaching the pre-requisites courses? They must be doing a terrible job because too many of my students don’t have the basics. How am I supposed to teach them more? And why haven’t the English, ESL or basic skills mathematics classes prepared them? It makes me too furious to even talk about all the high schools aren’t doing to prepare students for college! What has happened to education these days?
Bargaining
All right, so yes, I have some unprepared students. I want to work with them, but can’t hold back the rest of the class. What small things can I do to help them? I recommend tutoring, going to the Writing Center or mathematics lab, but I just don’t have the time to do much. What is the least I have to do to assist them so they can succeed?
Chapter 14
5
Depression
I must be a terrible teacher. My students keep getting worse, no matter what I do. What used to work doesn’t succeed anymore. I think I’ll retire soon.
Acceptance
I know that I have many students with basic skills needs that affect their performance in my course. Some of this is due to the changing demographics of California which has resulted in many more students entering the community college system with low literacy skills. But many of my students just don’t read and write at the level they should have completed in high school. Other adult students simply have very rusty or absent writing and study skills. For whatever reason, these students are in my transfer level courses. I want to help them achieve their academic dreams. Though solving this challenge is complex and will involve the efforts of a great many, I know there are concrete steps that I can take inside my classroom to help these students. I’m eager to learn what I can possibly do.
Attitude Adjustment
As two transfer faculty, we have run the gamut of the emotions listed above. It wasn’t until we started working on the Basic Skills Initiative and learned the facts that we settled into acceptance on a permanent basis. Just understanding what was going on from a statewide perspective helped us get a handle on what was happening in our own courses. We also discovered wonderful tools to assist us in working with students with basic skills needs and, though we teach very different disciplines in the sciences and humanities, incorporating these tools into our classes has resulted in better success – for all of our students. Here are the five most important things we learned that shifted us from feeling discouraged to feeling empowered that we could affect a change. These things may not be news to you, but they were to us. 1. Statistics support the fact that the majority of the students on our campuses have some basic skills needs. We weren’t crazy in observing that students were less prepared. Mind you, they weren’t any less smart, eager or unwilling to try, but some of them had developmental needs, even in transfer classes. It was the simple truth. Chapter 1 of this handbook provides some background on the students in our classrooms today; have a look at what the data are telling us. 2. We cannot assume that because a student has basic skills needs in one area, he or she is uniformly low in all areas of basic skills. Some are and some are not. A student may be below college level in mathematics, yet have college level reading and writing skills or vice versa. We discovered that we could not treat the students in our courses as if they all had the same issues or learning needs.
Chapter 14
6
3. For many students, previous educational experiences have not taught them the primary pre-requisite of having a learner identity (Please read Chapter 6 of this handbook for an extended discussion about this important key to learning). We found that we could not assume that our students had study and time management skills and knew how to become fully engaged in the learning process, no matter what level of course they are taking. It was no good hoping someone else would take care of this. The reality was that that if we wanted to help them succeed, we had to find creative ways of teaching them how to be students. Where else could they learn this except in each and every class that they were taking right at that very moment, no matter the level? 4.
Research clearly shows that in order for the students to grasp our specific discipline content, each course must also include metacognition (learning about learning). Students must be given an opportunity to reflect on their learning process in order to absorb the facts and intricacies of any subject. This was a shock – and an empowering moment. Metacognition is discussed in detail in Chapter 5 of this handbook, along with suggestions of exercises and techniques for fostering it.
5. We had to stretch our ideas about teaching. As discipline experts, we had received no training on how to teach students with basic skills needs. Hang on! To tell the truth, as discipline faculty, we’d received no training on how to teach at all. Perhaps we are old fogeys and graduate study is different now, but the effective practices associated with metacognition and pedagogy were not a part of our discipline-specific training. We had to learn this on our own. And guess what? Learning all this has made for more exciting and successful classes for our students and for us as faculty.
So let’s get started with a few important points. We have all heard about writing and reading across the curriculum. But what is the basis for this and how important is it compared to discipline content?
What is expected of freshman level college students? In Spring 2002, the Intersegmental Committee of Academic Senates (ICAS) of the University of California, California State Universities and California Community Colleges created an important document that explored the present competencies of entering freshman in conjunction with an examination of the expectations of faculty in the areas of academic literacy, reading, writing, and thinking critically. These competencies can be found in Part II of the document at http://www.asccc.org/Publications/Papers/AcademicLiteracy/statementCompetencies.pdf Look at this list of competencies. This is the target list of skills for entering freshman.
Chapter 14
7
Chapter 14
8
Chapter 14
9
Chapter 14
10
Chapter 14
11
Chapter 14
12
Which of these skills do students need to succeed in your courses? Can students be successful in your course without these skills? If so, they will not be successful when they get to other courses that require these skills or in subsequent California State University (CSU) or University of California (UC) courses. Part of our task is to diagnose the gap between our students’ performance and this level of competency. In order to do this diagnosis, we must take some vital signs and then describe where the students fall short of these competencies. You may already be doing this, but if not, here are a few ideas that we have learned from our colleagues.
Diagnosing Basic Skills Needs
Let’s go back to that first set of assignments sitting on your desk. You’ve pushed your emotions aside and diligently noted which students didn’t do so well. But what is the problem? Look at each one individually. Was his or her performance on the assignment weak because the student couldn’t write? Could it be a reading problem? Are there ESL issues? Mathematics? Might the student have a learning disability? Or is it that the student hasn’t learned yet how to be a student and employ college level study skills? Here are some easy steps to help you diagnose the mystery. Step 1: We are not basic skills experts, however, every campus has resources available to meet these needs. Become familiar with the resources on your campus. Most campuses have study skills classes that start at various points in the semester. Resources range from specific courses to tutoring labs (with DLAs- Directed Learning Activities for discrete needs) and programs such as Extended Opportunity Program and Services (EOPS). Many times students and sometimes faculty don’t know about the resources available. Get educated! Consider adding information about the availability of these classes in your syllabus or handing out a flyer. Step 2: Become proactive. Incorporate an early assessment that is integrated with your lessons and relevant to your content at the beginning of the semester. You don’t have to administer a separate diagnostic or become a reading or learning disabilities expert and you are not determining reading grade level or mathematics proficiency. You are taking the students general vital signs regarding their ability to function in your course in terms of reading, mathematics, writing, or study skills. You can use something quick and easy, that’s both active and enjoyable for students, in order to identify who may have learning issues. Actually, you probably already employ many of these assessments, but perhaps do not use them as an opportunity to investigate who may need extra help. Here are some quick examples. We know that you can invent many more. The key is to come up with something that doubles as a content learning activity as well.
Chapter 14
13
Reading • First, discover the reading grade level of your text book. Publishers may know this or your basic skills faculty or tutoring labs may have a simple program to figure this out. • Have the students read a paragraph related to the course content. Ask them to summarize the main point and give supporting details. • One biology faculty member gives a very simple safety quiz at the beginning of the second week of lab. She discovered that those who fail it usually have reading problems rather than a misunderstanding of the safety issues. • Use an essay question from an old exam. Ask the students to describe what the topic of the question is and to list some bullet points that may be relevant. • Give a few word problems or scenarios that are relevant to your class content. Mathematics faculty have told us that often times students who have problems interpreting mathematics word problems may not have trouble with mathematics, but rather reading. Reading and Writing • Have students read a short opinion piece relevant to your content. Ask them to write what the author’s opinion was and whether they agree or not. • Ask students to write a response to the syllabus (this doubles as a metacognitive exercise). Writing and ESL Issues • Ask students to complete an in-class writing within the first week of class. • Ask students to describe their writing process or history with writing (this is also a metacognitive exercise). • Do the above activity as a pair/share icebreaker and ask students to summarize their partner’s information in writing. Mathematics • Provide students with data, such as reading graphs or tables, and ask them to write a simple interpretation of it. See Appendix 1 for some examples. The Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) always has a large variety of graphs and tables about many current day topics from infections, to daylight savings accidents, to death rates by age and ethnicity. Find this treasure chest of data at www.cdc.gov. • Give students a problem to solve relevant to your course content that uses mathematic skills students should have mastered in previous courses. Disabled Students Programs Services (DSPS) • Use the quick diagnostic exercise found in Appendix 2 from Sierra College that specifically addresses Attention Deficit Disorder. Your DSPS office may have other simple diagnostics or even a list of hints to help you know when to refer a student to their services. Step 3: Identify those students who may have a potential learning issue and talk to them. Research has shown that students who feel that a faculty member has an interest in them become more engaged in the learning process. If it is available, you may review their transcript or assessment scores online for further information. Then consider referring them for assessment or to the other learning resources on campus. The key is to: Chapter 14
14
1) Check this out soon and try to get an intervention. You may have an early alert program on your campus; become familiar with your options to send these students to experts who will help them succeed. 2) Develop a relationship that communicates that you care about the student’s success. “But wait,” we hear you say. “I don’t have time to do this! I have to teach.” True. But we believe that this is a part of teaching. Besides, where is the best investment of your precious and limited time? Do you have time to wade through all the poorly written papers or misunderstood assignments later on? How about the students? Do they have time to sit in your class for a semester and receive a poor grade? We repeat: This doesn’t need to take a long time. You can easily create something that serves as a learning activity relevant to the content in your course AND is also a diagnostic.
Pedagogies that Address Basic Skills Needs
We discovered that you can also take a longer term approach to the needs of the developmental students in your classes. These activities will help them to better master the content of your courses by addressing the skill areas where they may be weak. To use the techniques, you may have to rethink how you introduce topics and/or get creative with embedding these into regular class activities. Oddly enough, we’ve found that these pedagogies also benefit the students who do not have basic skills needs. We’ve copied most everything listed here from previous chapters in this handbook, so you may want to read more about them in detail there.
Reading We were surprised to learn in our own classes that reading is often the make or break issue for students with basic skills needs. You may want to read Chapter 10 in detail to appreciate just what a complex task we ask of students when we assign reading texts. When students don’t have the skills to read or comprehend our content, they struggle greatly to succeed. Yet, some reading techniques turn out to be fairly easy to incorporate into classes across the disciplines. Since each subject area has its own vocabulary and viewpoint, we’ve found it valuable to spend time at the beginning of the semester teaching all students how to read the textbook using any of the methods listed below. This can be an active and engaging way to introduce students to the field and to preview the demands of the class.
Chapter 14
15
1. Reading Toolbox Developed by Joel Levine at Southwestern College, this handy page is jammed with techniques that you can use while students read a piece of discipline subject matter – something from the text book or other writing that they will encounter in your class. You can also use this as a diagnostic to discover who has reading issues. Give students a discipline-specific piece to read and ask them to complete any or all of the tools listed below. Please see Chapter 10 Appendix 1 for an example of the application of this tool box. OUR READING TOOLBOX
Elements of Thinking
Paraphrasing Putting a sentence that you have read into your own words.
INFORMATION
Headline Created Creating a headline (title) that you think expresses the main idea of the reading.
PURPOSE
Significant Sentence Selected Selecting the one sentence you think is most important in the reading, and telling why you selected it. Vital Question Posed Stating a question to the author or someone in the reading that you would really like an answer to.
INFORMATION QUESTION & PROBLEM
Identifying the main question at issue (problem) raised in the reading. Purpose Stating why you think this reading was written. SEEI S tating, E laborating, E xemplifying, and I llustrating certain words and concepts in the reading that you need to better understand. Conclusion Identifying what you think is the most important conclusion the author comes to in the reading. Assumptions Stating what you think the author is taking for granted in the reading. Implications & Consequences Stating what you think would happen if we follow, or do not follow what the author is suggesting we do. Solution/Recommendation Stating what you think should be done to deal effectively with the issue or problem being presented in the reading. Speaking in the Author’s Voice Stating ideas or answering questions about the reading as if you were the author herself or himself.
PURPOSE CONCEPTS CONCLUSION ASSUMPTIONS IMPLICATIONS & CONSEQUENCES INFERENCE POINT OF VIEW
Source: Joel Levine, Southwestern College
Chapter 14
16
2. SQ3R The authors of the reading chapter (Chapter 10 of this handbook) report that this is the “granddaddy” of reading approaches and works well for all learning styles. It also makes for a good in-class activity. Survey: Preview the text before reading to ascertain the main topics, organization, and to activate prior knowledge, Question: Generate a list of questions to guide ones’ reading – read with a questioning mind. Read: Actively read the text with the intention of looking for answers to questions, annotating important points and one’s reactions, and interacting with the text. Recite: After reading, actively do something with what was read, for example write answers to questions, talk about the reading with someone, teach it to a classmate Review: Review the section that was read to put it back into a coherent whole, review one’s notes and annotations, connect reading notes with lecture notes. Some faculty use this technique by having students ask each other the questions they have generated in study groups. The faculty member collects the questions and then selects the best questions to use on the exam. This creates value in the exercise, and students feel as though they have an inside track on at least one or two questions that may be on the exam. When you review the questions that students write, you’ll find that the ones with reading problems cannot even produce a relevant question. 3. KWL+ This is another one that helps students to assimilate what they have read and doubles as a metacognitive technique. In this activity, students ask four questions about what is to be read or learned: What do you KNOW about the subject? (Activates prior knowledge and stimulates commitment to learn.) What do you WANT to know about the subject? (Creates intention and purpose for reading.) What did you LEARN about the subject from the reading? (Provides review, comprehension check and opportunity for reflection on what was learned.) What do you still want to LEARN? (Provides opportunity for deeper exploration.) 4. PPPC This strategy combines both reading and note taking and annotation. One instructor we know teaches this on the first day of class and then creates a worksheet based on the questions. Those students who use it are allowed to use these notes when answering quiz questions. This provides a handy incentive for repeating the process throughout the semester.
Chapter 14
17
Preview: Preview the selection looking at the topics, organization and to activate prior knowledge. Predict: Predict what the reading will be about to set expectations, and begin to generate a questioning mind. Pre-read: Using skimming techniques read the first sentence of every paragraph because that is often where the main idea is in textbooks. It will give the reader a good context for reading the text in depth. Code: Take notes, write reactions to the text, generate questions that still need answering etc. This is the way to review, record and test what has been learned. (See Appendix 4 for more detail on this technique and others.)
Writing As Chapter 7 of this handbook explains, the best way for students to learn how to write is to do it often and to write at length. We’re sorry to be the bearers of bad news but:
The most effective way for faculty to help students improve their writing is to require them to write in all disciplines. Please, do not accept poorly written work. Make a percentage of the assignment’s grade based on clarity, spelling and grammar – even if it’s a small percentage. This will assist all students to realize that writing matters. If you don’t expect them to write properly, students rationalize that the writing skills they learn are limited to their English classes. Help them to understand that writing counts even in science and mathematics courses. Aside from earning the undying respect and admiration of your English colleagues, you will be holding students to the ICAS standards and preparing them for transfer and/or the world of work. (See the SCANS skills listed in Chapter 13 of this handbook.) Before you throw this chapter on the ground, protesting loudly -- “Just where do you expect me to find the time? How can I grade all of that?” -- we want to assure you that there are a few things that you can do to make this process easier on yourself. First off, read Chapter 7 for a detailed discussion of effective practices in teaching writing. Use any of the techniques there that seem useful to you. Here is a list of the ones we have found most helpful.
Chapter 14
18
1. Muddiest Point Use this Cross and Angelo Classroom Assessment technique after going over a lecture or an out-ofclass writing assignment. Ask students to anonymously write one sentence that describes the muddiest point or what most confuses them about the lecture or assignment. 2. Pre-writing Make time in class for some pre-writing activities to help students brainstorm paper topics and/or a thesis for your writing assignment. Chapter 7 describes pre-writing strategies in detail. 3. Student Sample Papers Show your classes examples of the assignment written by students from previous semesters. We’ve found that showing them an example of a mediocre paper and asking them to grade it or discuss how it succeeds and fails is a wonderful learning opportunity and results in better efforts on their behalf. If you are worrying about the time factor again, remember that taking the time in class to do this may save you hours of grading weak or unsuccessful papers later on. 4. Rubrics Speaking of grading, one way to save yourself tons of time is to create a rubric that precisely defines what you are looking for in the assignment by describing an A through F paper. If you share this with students in advance, it helps them to know what to do. You can use it when looking at sample papers as suggested in number 2 above. It also saves you time when actually grading, because the rubric has already spoken what you may have written in side or end comments. One instructor we know includes rubrics for each writing assignment in her syllabus, asks students to grade their own work using the rubric before they turn it in to her, and then comments on the differences between their grade and her own. She says that students tend to under-grade themselves (giving themselves lower grades than she would). An added bonus is that this process has resulted in very few distraught students coming up after class to challenge their grades. They already know why they have gotten a B instead on an A. If you’ve never written a rubric before, take a look at Appendix 3 in this chapter. It will take you step by step through the process. There are also many rubrics available online. A word of warning! Take the time to tweak any of the ones that you find elsewhere because the main point of a rubric is to accurately reflect how you actually grade. 5. Grading Take to heart the important information relayed in Chapter 7 of this handbook. You do not need to mark each and every error on a student’s paper. Research has shown that this does not actually help students improve because you are making the improvements for them. It’s more helpful if you correct an error the first time and then mark the general area where it occurs again, asking the student to find and correct it. 6. Revision Finally, in order to help students learn, consider allowing them to revise their papers. Give them the opportunity and incentive to find the errors you’ve indicated and make corrections. An English Chapter 14
19
teacher we know suggests that if you choose to do this, ask them to turn in both the previously graded version of the paper and their revision. This may allow you to quickly scan to see if they’ve made the corrections you’ve asked for instead of having to closely read the entire paper again.
ESL
When working with students who have second language issues, it’s important to understand the scope of the task. The following information from Chapter 8 of this handbook may provide you with some important background.
Acquiring a Second Language
The components involved in language acquisition- socio-cultural, linguistic, academic, and cognitive processes - are interdependent and complex. Research shows that …cognitive and academic development in the first language has an extremely important and positive effect on second language schooling (e.g. Bialystok, 1991; Collier, 1989, 1992b; Garcia, 1994; Genesee, 1987, 1994; Thomas & Collier, 1995). Academic skills, literacy development, concept formation, subject knowledge, and learning strategies developed in the first language will all transfer to the second language. As students expand their vocabulary and their oral and written communication skills in the second language, they can increasingly demonstrate their knowledge base developed in the first language. Furthermore, some studies indicate that if students do not reach a certain threshold in their first language, including literacy, they may experience cognitive difficulties in the second language (Collier, 1987; Collier & Thomas, 1989; Cummins, 1981, 1991; Thomas & Collier, 1995). Language Acquisition for School
(Copyright, Virginia P. Collier, 1994.
Source: Collier,V.P. (1994). Language Acquisition for School. http://www.ncela.gwu.edu/pubs/directions/04.htm
Research shows that it takes five to seven years to acquire academic proficiency in a second language. This kind of proficiency enables the learner to process information at a higher level of critical thinking, including finding relationships, making inferences, and drawing conclusions. As the Chapter 14
20
diagram above indicates, language acquisition for school involves a combination of interdependent factors that must all be addressed to ensure student success. A special subgroup of English language learners is known as Generation 1.5. In the literature, a student is generation 1.5 if he or she arrived in the U.S. as a pre-teen school-age child (Oropesa and Landale, 1997, pp. 429-455). This is a critical age in language and academic development, and these students have not acquired full literacy in their first language, which leads to special difficulties in acquiring English as their second language (ESL). A particular problem for these students is that they have been exposed primarily to conversational language (for basic communication), and that is the kind of language the student, in turn, produces. For many of the ESL students, and Generation 1.5 students in particular, entering community colleges, the greatest challenge is to process and produce language at a higher level of critical thinking which will allow them to succeed in college-level work (Oropesa & Landale, 1997, pp. 429-455). As described in the research below, the effect of this basic English language need in Generation 1.5 is different than non-English speaking immigrants with ESL needs. An increasing number of U.S. high school graduates enter college while still in the process of learning English. Referred to as generation 1.5 students because they share characteristics of both first- and second-generation immigrants (Rumbaut & Ima, 1988), they do not fit into any of the traditional categories of nonnative English speakers enrolled in college writing courses, nor have they been the focus of much research on students learning to write in English as a second language (Harklau, Losey, & Siegal, 1999). Familiar with U.S. culture and schooling, generation 1.5 students have different learning needs from other English language learners, such as immigrants with limited English proficiency and international students who travel to the United States for the express purpose of earning an American college degree. It takes many years for literacy in a second language to develop fully. To be successful in college, generation 1.5 students may need to unlearn previous practices and learn new ways of approaching writing. To do this, they need access to instruction that recognizes that they are different from other English language learners. This instruction needs to make room for their diverse backgrounds and strengths and prepare them for life outside the classroom. (Harklau, 2003, ¶1)
Important Facts about Generation 1.5 Language Learners Language Acquisition Oral/aural dominant
Use of Meta language In Speech and Writing Communication Skills Chapter 14
Acquired through informal interaction with friends, family, classmates and coworkers, English dominant siblings and radio and TV May not notice grammatical features; may use incorrect verb and word forms, confuse count and non count nouns, plurals, articles and prepositions (e.g. don’t see the difference between “confident” vs. “confidence”) Generally lack language for grammatical terms to understand grammar errors (when teachers talk about progressive verbs or gerunds, they look blank). Rely heavily on context – use body language, intonation, facial expressions to make themselves understood. Writing is difficult because they lack these clues. When proofreading, can’t identify mistakes. Highly proficient, but face difficulty in academic writing that demands a high level of grammatical accuracy. 21
As stated earlier, all faculty in the community colleges are dealing with Generation 1.5 students, plus other ESL students with more specific needs. What is it that we expect of them when they leave ESL and move on to other courses?
Academic Literacy: A Statement of Competencies As referenced earlier in this chapter, ICAS competencies provide some standard expectations of entering freshman. (Again, these competencies can be found in Part II of the document at http://www.asccc.org/Publications/Papers/AcademicLiteracy/statementCompetencies.pdf.) But here we would like to highlight the additional competencies necessary for L2 learners in the chart below.
You can reference Chapter 8 of this handbook for specific activities that are helpful for ESL learners and adapt them to your discipline if you determine this is a major concern for your course. You may also want to consider teaming up with an ESL faculty member and creating a learning community to address these issues if a large number of your students are L2 learners and particularly if you teach a lot of Generation 1.5 students. You should also consider consulting with any Puente instructors on your campus for additional help.
Mathematics
Look at Chapter 9 of this handbook for a variety of techniques used by mathematics faculty that might be converted to mathematics activities contextualized to your specific discipline needs. The following is a sample from the mathematics chapter that can be easily modified for any topic or discipline.
Chapter 14
22
Three by fives by Joan Córdova •
At the beginning of the semester my students are asked to add 3x5 cards to their list of school supplies. Virtually every class session they are asked to use the 3x5 cards in a variety of classroom assessment exercises. The exercises vary depending on what is needed including Muddiest Point, Minute Papers, and sample problems.
•
Often the class will start with a 3x5 question on the board that assesses the topic of the previous lesson. It takes a few minutes for the students to work and less than a minute to read through the cards to see how well the class understood the lesson.
•
The cards are then shuffled and used to call on students throughout the class session. The cards keep me from unknown biases I may have when calling on students. Maybe I only call on the kids with pony tails or something. With the cards it allows me to call on them by name. They know their card is in the stack so they have a possibility of being called on. By the end of the class I try to have made it all the way through the stack.
•
To help with the stress of being called on I use the “Who Wants to be a Millionaire” model. When a student is called on they have an opportunity for a life line or to poll the audience. What is interesting is that once they know they have an option, they will try the problem first. They are more willing to offer answers and opinions. This was a very interesting unexpected outcome. It also gives me an opportunity to ask “Is that your final answer” which gets them reviewing what they said.
Examples: •
The first class after discussing addition of fractions with different denominators the 3 x 5 card at the beginning of class might ask: When adding fractions, what is the first thing you need to know? Are the denominators the same? is the correct response but the actual responses provide valuable insight.
•
When working on word problems the 3 x 5 card at the beginning of class might ask them to identify the steps taken to work a word problem. Or perhaps ask the students what the first step in solving a word problem could be. The answers may vary but what would be acceptable would be Read the problem or something along the lines of Identify what the problem is asking.
Minute Paper Chapter 14
23
(Angelo and Cross, 1993, p 120) Description: No other technique has been used more often or by more college teachers than the Minute Paper. This technique -- also known as the One-Minute Paper and the Half-Sheet Response -provides a quick and extremely simple way to collect written feedback on student learning. To use the Minute Paper, an instructor stops class two or three minutes early and asks students to respond briefly to some variation on the following two questions: "What was the most important thing you learned during this class?" and "What important question remains unanswered?" Students write their responses on index cards or half-sheets of scrap paper and hand them in. Variations: •
What was the most important point of the section?
•
What was the most surprising idea or concept?
•
What question remains unanswered in your mind?
•
What question from this class might appear on the next quiz/test?
•
What was the muddiest point of the class?
•
What was the main concept illustrated in class?
Step-by-Step Procedure: 1. Decide first what you want to focus on and, as a consequence, when to administer the Minute Paper. If you want to focus on students' understanding of a lecture, the last few minutes of class may be the best time. If your focus is on a prior homework assignment, however, the first few minutes may be more appropriate. 2. Using the two basic questions from the "Description" above as starting points, write Minute Paper prompts that fit your course and students. Try out your Minute Paper on a colleague or teaching assistant before using it in class. 3. Plan to set aside five to ten minutes of your next class to use the technique, as well as time later to discuss the results. 4. Before class, write one or, at the most, two Minute Paper questions on the chalkboard or prepare an overhead transparency. 5. At a convenient time, hand out index cards or half-sheets of scrap paper. 6. Unless there is a very good reason to know who wrote what, direct students to leave their names off the papers or cards. 7. Let the students know how much time they will have (two to five minutes per question is usually enough), what kinds of answers you want (words, phrases, or short sentences), and when they can expect your feedback.
Chapter 14
24
Finally, if you have not visited FLAG Field-Tested Learning Assessment Guide at http://www.flaguide.org/ You should explore these easily downloadable resources for many different disciplines.
The FLAG offers broadly applicable, self-contained modular classroom assessment techniques (CATs) and discipline-specific tools for Science Technology Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) instructors interested in new approaches to evaluating student learning, attitudes and performance. Each has been developed, tested and refined in real colleges and universities classrooms. The FLAG also contains an assessment primer, a section to help you select the most appropriate assessment technique(s) for your course goals, and other resources. Another invaluable tool is a simple but terrific book on pedagogical techniques backed by research data called Scientific Teaching by Handelsman, Miller and Pfund, C. (2007). It takes about two hours to read but will reorient the way you run your course.
Chapter 14
25
Metacognition As we admitted earlier in the chapter, we were shocked to learn that students needed to reflect on their learning experience in order to absorb discipline content. Chapter 5 of this handbook contains valuable information about metacognition and the neuroscience behind it. We urge you to examine that material carefully because it will give rise to many ideas about how to incorporate metacognitive activities into your classes. Here are a few of our favorites. Student Self-Assessment Chapter 5 contains many sample self-assessments that you can use to have students look at what kinds of learning skills they possess at the moment and the skills needed to be a successful student. The Appendix of Chapter 5 includes several Student Study Checklists that you may want to borrow or tweak to fit your specific discipline. In addition to informing students about what is needed to succeed in your field, it also provides them with an opportunity to assess themselves, one of the keys to incorporating that invaluable “learner identity” lacking in so many students with basic skills needs (Again, see Chapter 6 for a discussion about this). Learning Styles Assessments You can easily turn a quick learning styles assessment into a class activity. Chapter 5 lists several that are free and available online. Best of all, they don’t take long to complete. Research has shown that students who are aware of their learning styles and the types of activities that help them to learn often have better success than those who do not. You can talk about specific techniques that students with differing learning styles can use to absorb the content of your discipline or create activities that provide opportunities to explore those techniques. Why would you want to take the time to do this during class? Because it may help you avoid the stack of woeful assignments you imagined at the beginning of this chapter. Some faculty have turned this metacognitive exploration into an extended activity. In an attempt to teach students argumentation and research, one English teacher we know asks students to assess their own learning style, research its particulars and then argue whether or not they agree with their categorization. Certainly those in the social sciences can also use this as an opportunity to allow students to think critically about this topic while learning some techniques that may help them to study. Exam Postmortem This activity, detailed in the Appendix to Chapter 5, has proven very helpful for those instructors who give major exams. Using the form shown in the Appendix, student are asked to assess their preparation and performance on an exam. Faculty report that they sometimes see a light bulb go on when students take a hard look at how they prepared and what they plan to do differently next time. It has even been known to improve their performance on the next test.
Chapter 14
26
Quick Takes There are lots of other ways to embed metacognitive moments into a class. Simply asking students to tell you what they learned from a major assignment (perhaps in the middle of doing it and also after it is done) allows them to reflect on their learning. Many Angelo and Cross Classroom Assessment Techniques are metacognitive in nature. In discussion-oriented courses, you can ask students to reflect on what they said and what they held back during a debate. Looking at why they spoke can be revealing. Likewise, asking them to give advice to next semester’s students provides them with an opportunity to reflect on what they’ve learned. Remember that each time you do this, you are helping students to assume a learner identity, learn about how they best learn and absorb the content you are teaching.
More about Time We imagine that many of you have been reading this chapter while shaking your heads. “These authors are nuts! I don’t have the time to do this. There’s so much I have to cover to prepare students for the next level in my field or to transfer. I can’t get through all the information now. How can I set aside time in class for all this other fancy stuff?” We know that no matter how lengthy your quarter or semester is, it just never seems long enough. We agree. That’s true, especially in the sciences. But this is also true – no matter at what breakneck pace you teach, you truly can’t get through all of a subject in one class. Microbiology? It changes every day. Computer Sciences? New developments make what you’ve been teaching obsolete very quickly. American History to 1865? Surely you are not able to teach the full complexity of two hundred years in sixteen weeks. Latin American Literature? Let’s get real. There’s just too much to cover. So you have to select. What are the most important things that students need to learn and know how to do to succeed at the next level? We want to remind you that you are already making those choices. The question you need to answer is: How can you best prepare students to succeed? We believe that spending a little time assessing the difficulties that students are having in learning your field and providing them with tools and the opportunity to reflect on their knowledge may prepare them better than if you “covered” all of your content without including this. We know that many faculty love to debate the differences between teaching in depth versus teaching for breadth. We’re proposing to add another ingredient to the controversy: teaching about learning.
Set up a Research Study
While you’re debating, why not set up a research study to explore if any of these methods really work. Of course, you’ll want to assess the student learning outcomes for your course and discover if using any of these methodologies improve student success. You may also be interested in forming a Faculty Inquiry Group (FIG) to gather other faculty who would also like to investigate these techniques. FIGs are explained in detail in Chapter 20 of this handbook, as part of the discussion of professional development. Other suggestions there may prove fruitful for you as well.
Chapter 14
27
Prerequisites: Recognizing Student’s Basic Skills Needs and Guiding them to Success Perhaps one of the most important issues that needs to be discussed in this chapter and considered by faculty that teach transfer courses revolves around assessment and pre-requisites. If we know we have more and more students in our colleges with basic skills needs in reading, writing or math, how do they pass our college level general education courses? How can a student pass a transfer –level history course if they read at an eighth grade level? How do they pass a transfer-level economics course if they can not understand graphs and have basic mathematics skills? How do they pass a college-level philosophy course if they can not write at college level? The truth is, many do not pass. Many drop out of the courses and others struggle to the end and fail. A quick look at the statewide success rates for basic skills students who take general education courses, compared to students without basic needs that take the same courses, reveals a meaningful disparity. TABLE 1 State-wide Student Success in Basic Skills and Non-Basic Skills Courses
State-wide Success Rate Spring 2007 All Disciplines Note: The State-wide figures represent 112 reported out of total of 117 reporting entities statewide Total Success Basic Skills Program Type Status Enrollments Succeeded Rate (%) Business and Management (05) Basic Skills 1,510 579 38.34% Business and Management (05) Non-Basic-skills 232,185 149,364 64.33% Education (08) Basic Skills 1620 971 59.94% Education (08) Non-Basic-skills 325,413 238,497 73.29% Fine and Applied Arts (10) Basic Skills 232 114 49.14% Fine and Applied Arts (10) Non-Basic-skills 311,417 219,782 70.57% Foreign Language (11) Basic Skills 242 9 45.00% Foreign Language (11) Non-Basic-skills 97,539 65,324 66.97% Humanities (Letters) (15) Basic Skills 35,878 19,833 55.28% Humanities (Letters) (15) Non-Basic-skills 417,808 272,946 65.33 Social Sciences (22) Basic Skills 14 6 42.86 Social Sciences (22) Non-Basic-skills 437,291 274,886 62.86 These data are from the California Community College Chancellor’s Office Datamart at http://www.cccco.edu/SystemOffice/Divisions/TechResearchInfo/MIS/DataMartandReports/tab id/282/Default.aspx. The table reports the student success of sample discipline courses by basic skills versus non-basic skills courses, representing the latest state-wide data for duplicated head count retrieved March 1, 2008. Title 5 requirements make applying prerequisites outside of a discipline a difficult task involving statistical analysis of student success, content review, and multiple options to meet the prerequisite requirements. “Prerequisites are an essential tool in the construction of curriculum for courses in Chapter 14
28
which student success is highly dependent on previously acquired knowledge or skills. However, effective use of prerequisites requires a balance of several countervailing factors (ASCCC, 1997).” Title 5 §55002(a)(2)(D) "determines, based on a review of the course outline of record, that a student would be highly unlikely to receive a satisfactory grade unless the student has knowledge or skills not taught in the course, then the course shall require prerequisites or corequisites...."
A Case Study
At Bakersfield College, faculty analyzed student success in the science general education courses and found that students reading below college level were likely to fail those courses. Some administrators were reticent to apply a prerequisite of college level reading, fearing that enrollment in the courses would drop. However, the textbooks used in the courses were analyzed and found to be 17th gradelevel reading. A review of the course content revealed that success in the class involved reading the textbook, lab manuals, online materials and outside research materials. Interestingly, additional studies found that English 1A was a better predictor of student success. But to establish a prerequisite, Title 5 requires a content review. In other words, the prerequisite must provide skills and content that enable a student to succeed in the target course. While success in English 1A equated with probable success in biology, there was not adequate agreement that writing assignments were robust enough to validate the writing prerequisite. The content in the English 1 A class did not match up with required entry skills. There were probably other factors that made it predict student success, such as student study and work skills, but it did not relate to course content. After a thorough discussion and analysis a prerequisite of college level reading was applied to all general education science courses. There was a slight dip in the number of students taking the courses the first year. But no measureable effect for the last 5 years. The courses have strong attendance and, in the biology courses, this translated into both retention and success rates for that exceeded statewide success and retention rates. Here are other data samples from research on Psychology and Sociology general educations courses. Translated these data indicate that a student is 20% less likely to succeed in Sociology if they do not have college level reading skills and that they have less than a 50/50 chance of passing without those skills. Table 2 Reading Prerequisite Analysis for Sociology 1 Sociology B1A Students from Fall 2001 to Summer 2003 Met the PreReq * Yes (1)
No (0)
SOCI B1 Course Success - Yes (1)
421
63.2%
216
43.1%
SOCI B1 Course Success - No (0)
245
36.8%
285
56.9%
Total
666
100.0%
501
100.0%
Grand Total All
1167
* To Meet the Prerequisite, a student must have: Chapter 14
29
1) Tested at College-Level Reading or above, and/or 2) Completed Coursework - Reading 50 (ACDVB50) with a C or Better Success is equal to a grade of C or better The data on the Psychology class reveals that students without college level reading skills is 24% less likely to succeed and has just over a 50/50 chance of passing the course. Table 3- Pyschology B1A PreReq Study Pysch B1A Students from Fall 2001 to Summer 2003 Reading Prerequisite Analysis Met the PreReq * Yes (1)
No (0)
Psych B1A Course Success - Yes (1)
1091
75.2%
547
51.0%
Psych B1A Course Success - No (0)
360
24.8%
525
49.0%
Total
1451 100.0% 1072 100.0%
Grand Total All
2523
* To Meet the Prerequisite, a student must have: 1) Tested at College-Level Reading or above, and/or 2) Completed Coursework - Reading 50 (ACDVB50) with a C or Better Success is equal to a grade of C or better What do these kinds of data tell us about applying prerequisites? What message are we sending to students if we do not have prerequisites on courses and allow them to fail, and then repeat and fail the course again? Is this effective use of the student’s time, the faculty members’ efforts and the funding to support this process? Our UC and CSU transfer institutions do not generally have basic skills prerequisites on general education courses because they select for students with high GPA’s and standardized test scores. They require specific level of high school course completion and assume students have reached college level skills. Should we be concerned that some students without college level reading can pass college-level transfer courses? Should our transfer partners be concerned? These are the important questions faculty who teach transfer level courses must consider in light of our large numbers of students with basic skills needs. What do you know about your success rates and the number of students with basic skills needs in your courses?
Chapter 14
30
Chapter 14
Working with Students who have Basic Skills Needs in Transfer Courses: Completing the Building Part II
Appendix 1: Graphs to Determine Mathematics Abilities Appendix 2: Attention Deficit Disorder (ADD) Checklist Appendix 3: Cabrillo College Directions for Writing a Rubric Appendix 4: Sample Rubrics Appendix 5: Resources for Chapter 14
Chapter 14
31
Appendix 1 Graphs to Determine Mathematics Abilities Look at the following graph and write a paragraph about the main points or conclusions this graph allows us to make. Do these data raise any further questions in your mind?
http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/products/pubs/pubd/hestats/teenpreg1990-2002/Figure4.png
Chapter 14
32
This is a typical graph used on a patient’s chart to represent growth. At Jason’s last check up the nurse circled two points on the graph. What does this tell us about Jason’s age, height and weight? How does he compare to other children his age?
Chapter 14
33
Appendix 2
Attention Deficit Disorder (ADD) Checklist Answer Yes or No to the following questions: Yes 1.
Are you easily distracted?
2.
Are you quickly bored?
3.
Do get impatient or easily frustrated?
4.
Are you disorganized?
5.
Do you often forget or lose things?
6.
Do you have poor listening skills?
7.
Do other people think you engage in high risk behaviors?
8.
Are you impulsive?
9.
Do you have difficulty delaying gratification?
10.
Do you have difficulty following through on assignments, projects or completing tasks?
11.
Do you have temper outbursts?
12.
Do other people consider you to be hyperactive or very talkative?
No
If you answered YES to more than three of these questions, you may have Attention Deficit Disorder. Please contact the Learning Opportunity Center (7810553) for more information. Revised 1/30/2009-Martine Shelley, Sierra College
Chapter 14
34
Appendix 3
Rubric Writing Workbook
By Marcy Alancraig, Cabrillo College SLO Assessment Coordinator 831-479-6366
[email protected] Some materials in this workbook have been taken from the Cabrillo College SLO web site, written by the author
Chapter 14
35
Overview How can you tell if students in your course have achieved mastery of your assignments? That’s easy. You simply grade them. But if you choose to use classroom assignments as a way to assess student learning outcomes, you may need to grade a bit differently.. Using classroom assignments as an assessment tool is called course embedded assessment; it is a legitimate and useful way to measure student learning, whether for individual courses or, when approached as a sampling methodology, for both programs and institutional student learning outcomes. Besides, it also can improve the regular work you do everyday in your classroom. This approach to teaching and assessment believes that students will perform better if they understand how they will be graded in advance. They need to know the precise standards and criteria that make up an A, B or C grade. “But, my students know that already,” you perhaps protest. “We talk about it on the first day of class. The percentages that make up their final grade are right in my syllabus. And I use a grading sheet when I return work.” I’ve worked with many excellent faculty across California who are certain that they are perfectly clear with students about grading. Sure, they have had some complaints over the years, but that is to be expected. Yet, when asked if they tell their classes exactly what elements compose an A paper, project or major assignment, most admit that they have not gone into it in that kind of detail. The good news is that once they did, through developing a grading rubric, they have found that students were much less confused. Students seemed to have a better grasp of what they needed to do to successfully complete an assignment. More importantly, once the assignments were graded using the rubric, students understood the marks they earned. Complaints about grades were greatly reduced! A rubric translates the standards and criteria that make up grading into some sort of chart or description. Rubrics can be used to score many kinds of written assignments or exams, papers, projects, speeches or portfolios. They are not useful, however, as a grading mechanism for multiple choice or short answer tests. However, you can analyze those kinds of assessments by looking at groups of questions to also determine how well students are mastering your outcomes. A rubric answers the question, “What precisely is an A on a particular assignment or project? How is it different from a B or C?” While this is information that many of us carry inside our heads, in order to clearly assess student learning outcomes, it must be articulated in writing. However, it is up to you – the expert in your classroom – to define these standards and criteria and how they will be applied to the class work that you assign. Your rubric will be as individual as your grading style and pedagogy.
Chapter 14
36
Sample Rubrics A rubric is an individual as an instructor, the assignment or the course. They can be organized and presented in many different ways. Before designing your own, it’s helpful to look at rubrics developed by other teachers in different disciplines. The following rubrics were created faculty across the state and have been used successfully by their instructors. Take a look at all the different ways you can organize and present your grading criteria to students. Note the sample grading sheet on the last page that is tied to an English 1A rubric. Students receive both the rubric and grading sheet before attempting the assignment. The sheet is used to summarize how well the students did on each aspect of the grading rubric. It also articulates what they need to do to improve their grade in the future. Here’s the bonus: some faculty who used rubrics combined with grading sheets for the first time reported that they spent less overall time grading.
Chapter 14
37
Sample Rubrics Short Essay Rubric (Used in a Human Genetics course.)
Score Content
Organization
Development
Use of Language
5
Answer is appropriate to the question. Content is factually correct.
Clear sense of order. Begins with a thesis or topic sentence. Supporting points are presented in a logical progression.
Develops each point with may specific details. Answers question completely.
Uses technical or scientific terminology appropriately and correctly. No major grammatical or spelling errors.
4
Answer is appropriate to the question. Content may have one or two factual errors.
May lack a thesis sentence, but points are presented in a logical progression.
Each point supported with some details and evidence. All important points included.
Accurate word choice. No more than 2 major errors and a few minor errors.
3
Content relates peripherally to the question; contains significant factual errors.
Logic of argument is minimally perceivable. Points presented in a seemingly random fashion, but all support argument.
Sparse details or evidence. Question only partially answered.
Ordinary word choice; use of scientific terminology avoided. Some serious errors (but they don’t impair communication).
2
Content unrelated to question.
Lacks clear organizational plan. Reader is confused.
Statements are unsupported by any detail or explanation. Repetitious, incoherent, illogical development.
Limited vocabulary; errors impair communication.
Developed by Denise Lim, Biology.
Chapter 14
38
Sample Rubric for Assessing Photographs 1. Concept, idea, visualization: 10 pts Shows coherency of the concept with a high degree of originality and sophistication. The idea is well stated with visual elements and cues. 9 pts
Shows coherency of the concept with some originality and sophistication. The idea is stated with visual elements and cues but needs to be more clear or more strongly evident.
8 pts
Shows some coherency of the concept with commonly sued, cliché or stereotyped imagery. The idea is obtuse, and requires greater clarity through the use of visual elements and cues.
7 pts
Lacks general coherency of the concept. Many of the visual elements and cues do not lead the viewer to the intended idea.
6 pts
Lacks any coherency of the concept. Visual elements and cues do not lead the viewer to the intended idea.
0 pts
The work was not presented to me.
2. Composition & design: 10 pts Shows strong internal integrity of the visual elements. Nothing needs to be added or removed – framing is superb. 9 pts
Shows internal integrity of the visual elements. A visual element needs to be added, moved or removed – framing needs some slight adjustment.
8 pts
Shows obvious weaknesses in the internal integrity of the visual elements. Many visual elements need to be added, moved or removed – framing needs definite adjustments.
7 pts
Image is breaking apart – there is very little internal integrity of the visual elements. Most visual elements need to be rethought – framing needs major readjustment.
6 pts
Visual integrity is nonexistent and image has broken apart. All of the visual elements need to be rethought – framing needs a complete overhaul.
0 pts
The work was not presented to me.
3. Technical: 10 pts Shows master in the use of photographic equipment and techniques to attain the assignment parameters. 9 pts
Shows a good command of the use of photographic equipment and techniques to attain most of the assignment parameters.
8 pts
Shows some command of the use of photographic equipment and techniques to attain some of the assignment parameters.
7 pts
Shows limited command of the use of photographic equipment and techniques to attain a few of the assignment parameters.
6 pts
Shows little or no command of the use of photographic equipment and techniques to attain a few or none of the assignment parameters.
0 pts
The work was not presented to me. Developed by Susan Hoisington, Photography.
Chapter 14
39
Sample Rubric for Oceanography 10 Lab Project Bathymetric Map and Cross Section (Lab #2) Grading Criteria An “A” grade (9 or 10 out of 10): • The contour lines are extremely smooth and evenly spaced with none of them touching each other. • Every water depth # has the appropriate contour line next to it and the entire map is “contoured”. • The overall presentation is excellent. • The cross section is accurate and complete and the bottoms of the canyons and top of the ridge are not flat. • The ends of the cross section are complete and the paper shows the vertical exaggeration. A “B” grade (8 out of 10): • The contour lines are neat and smooth and appropriately spaced and some are touching, but very few. • Nearly all the water depth #’s are contoured, some may be missing, but very few. • The overall presentation is good and very few “shadows” are showing. • The cross section is accurate, but some information is missing, particularly on the ends. • Vertical exaggeration may or may not be shown. A “C” grade (6 or 7 out of 10): • The contour lines are a little wide and show fringes, some may have double ends and some of them are obviously touching each other. • Some of the water depth #’s may not be contoured and the contour lines are all not evenly or properly spaced. There may be shadows on the map and the overall presentation is slightly sloppy. • The cross section is mostly accurate, but some information is off line and missing, particularly on the ends. • Vertical exaggeration may not be shown. A “D” and “F” grade (5 or less out of 10): • The contour lines are sloppy and inaccurate and some or many are touching each other. • Several of the water depth #’s are not accurately contoured and the map is not complete. • The overall presentation is below or far below average. • The cross section is inaccurate, and much information is off line and missing. • Vertical exaggeration may be shown. Developed by Dave Schwartz, Geology.
Chapter 14
40
English1A Essay Rubric
W0W!!! (90-100 Points - Grade A)
• Begins with an introduction that shows your understanding of the issues, grabs your readers’ attention, and presents a strong and insightful thesis or point of view. • Engages the topic in a thoughtful and individual way, showing originality, elegance and clear thinking. • Develops the topic using a strong detail, quotes from other sources, and a unique synthesis of ideas. • Utilizes library research and quotes from outside sources, always properly citing them using the MLA format. • Possesses a fully explained and logical progression of ideas that indicates the writer’s sensitivity to different ways of looking at the topic with an awareness of key counter arguments and a consideration of how those alternate positions shape your understanding of the topic. • Ends with a strong conclusion that clarifies the significance of the paper’s lessons • Chooses words aptly and sometimes inventively. • Demonstrates mastery of most of the grammar and usage conventions of Standard English. • Uses phrasing, tone, and expression that reflects a unique personal voice.
Good! Almost There (80-89 Points - Grade B)
• Begins with an introduction that shows some understanding of the issues, gives some background and has an adequate thesis or point of view. • Presents a thoughtful response to the topic, using appropriate reasoning and a partially realized analysis that is accurate. • Develops the topic showing appropriate details, a sense of orderly progress between ideas, and use of references that reveal a familiarity with the topic. • Uses words precisely if not creatively. • Varies sentence structure enough to read smoothly. • Utilizes library research and quotes from outside sources, usually properly citing them using the MLA format. • Uses competently the conventions of written English, containing few, if any, errors in sentence structure, punctuation and capitalization or usage. • Uses mostly consistent phrasing, tone and expression that reflects a personal world view and style.
Developed by Marcy Alancraig, English. Note grading sheet at the end.
Chapter 14
41
Getting there (70-79 Points - Grade C)
• Presents an adequate response to the topic, using superficial analysis and weak point of view. • Uses logical reasoning, but the supporting evidence is general and imprecise with few examples. There may be some small factual errors. • Uses a less precise vocabulary and may contain awkwardness of expression. • Utilizes library research and quotes from outside sources, with fairly consistent use of the MLA citation format. May make some errors. • Contains minor errors in mechanics and usage, and perhaps one or two more distracting errors in sentence structure. • Uses fairly consistent phrasing, tone and expression that reflect a personal world view and style with occasional inconsistencies.
Try Again (60-69 Points - Grade D) • • • •
Responds to the topic illogically, without a coherent structure or focus. Has no point of view, uses mostly summary and lacks evidence and support. Makes several large, factual errors. Makes enough errors in usage and sentence structure to cause a reader serious, if occasional, distraction. • Improperly uses the MLA format for citations. Makes major errors in quoting and uses few sources. • Uses frequently inconsistent phrasing, tone and expression, often formulaic and imitative; lacks evidence of a personal worldview and style.
Let’s not even go there (50-59 Points - Grade F)
• Doesn’t attempt the task or distorts it • Lacks organization or detail. • Contains many distracting errors in sentence structure, simplistic or inaccurate word choice, many repeated errors in grammar and usage. • Not enough is written to get a sense of personal worldview and style.
Chapter 14
42
English 1A Grading Sheet Paper #1-7 Grading Sheet Name: ____________________________________ Total Grade: _________ This paper is one of the pieces of evidence for Outcomes #3 and 4: • Use your unique voice to write papers that analyze the ecological, anthropological, historical and literary aspects of the Monterey Bay region. • Use the library to find information in books, magazines, electronic databases and on-line sources. Incorporate those sources in your writing, acknowledging them using MLA documentation style Based on the grading scale listed under Grading Requirements, your grade is divided into the elements listed in the chart below. Getting Try Let’s Not Elements of Grade Wow! Good There Again Go There Introduction Thesis or Claim Response to Topic Evidence to support thesis MLA citation and documentation Awareness of counter arguments Flow and order of Ideas Conclusion Word Choice Grammar and Punctuation Personal Voice
Comments:
Chapter 14
43
Cr e at i n g Ru b r i cs Wo r k sh e e t 1 Course Name and Number Core Competency or Course SLO Assessment Tool/Assignment
Assignment Components
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
Chapter 14
44
Cr e at i n g Ru b r i cs Wo r k sh e e t 2 Articulate your standards for each component
Score: A
Write a sentence that describes the component at this level. Be as specific as possible.
Component 1:
Component 2:
Component 3:
Component 4:
Component 5:
Component 6:
Component 7:
Component 8:
Chapter 14
45
Cr e at i n g Ru b r i cs Wo r k sh e e t 2 Articulate your standards for each component
Score:
B
Write a sentence that describes the component at this level. Be as specific as possible.
Component 1:
Component 2:
Component 3:
Component 4:
Component 5:
Component 6:
Component 7:
Component 8:
Chapter 14
46
Cr e at i n g Ru b r i cs Wo r k sh e e t 2 Articulate your standards for each component
Score: C
Write a sentence that describes the component at this level. Be as specific as possible.
Component 1:
Component 2:
Component 3:
Component 4:
Component 5:
Component 6:
Component 7:
Component 8:
Chapter 14
47
Cr e at i n g Ru b r i cs Wo r k sh e e t 2 Articulate your standards for each component
Score: D
Write a sentence that describes the component at this level. Be as specific as possible.
Component 1:
Component 2:
Component 3:
Component 4:
Component 5:
Component 6:
Component 7:
Component 8:
Chapter 14
48
Cr e at i n g Ru b r i cs Wo r k sh e e t 2 Articulate your standards for each component
Score:
F
Write a sentence that describes the component at this level. Be as specific as possible.
Component 1:
Component 2:
Component 3:
Component 4:
Component 5:
Component 6:
Component 7:
Component 8:
Chapter 14
49
Appendix 4 Sample Rubrics Sierra College ESL Departmental Writing Exam/Portfolio Scoring Rubric 0 (below 500): Demonstrates no or almost no writing competency • May include no response, copying of some text from prompt and nothing else, strings of words, memorized chunks or short response in native language • Provides no development of ideas • Uses very few English words • Lacks all control over grammar • May make errors in letter shape, size and spacing and/or use native language for spelling 1 (500): Demonstrates limited writing competency at the novice-mid level • Has limited writing skills characterized by strings of words or short sentences • Exhibits little development of ideas • Uses a limited vocabulary with word choice and form errors • Attempts sentences but with no control over most aspects of grammar • May rely on native language spelling or show little awareness of sound/letter correspondence and mechanics 2 (510): Demonstrates emerging writing competence at the novice-high level • Has emerging writing skills characterized by brief text • Produces paragraph-like writing that addresses the prompt at least marginally • Exhibits some evidence of development of ideas • Uses some common vocabulary with errors in word choice or form that interfere with meaning • Produces simple sentence structure with grammar errors that interfere with meaning • Employs some capitalization and punctuation but probably has extensive spelling errors 3 (520): Demonstrates developing writing competence at the intermediate–low level • Has moderately comprehensible text characterized by emerging paragraphing • Produces multiple paragraphs or one long paragraph that addresses aspects of the prompt • Develops paragraphs with topic sentences and some support although it may be general or with 1 limited example • Uses common vocabulary with some errors in word choice or form that may interfere with meaning • Produces a limited range of sentence structures with some grammar errors that may interfere with meaning • Shows some control of sentence boundaries, indenting, margins, spelling and mechanics Chapter 14
50
4 (530): Demonstrates basic writing competence at the intermediate-mid level • Has generally comprehensible text characterized by multiple paragraphs • Produces essay-like writing with basic organizational structure, including topic sentences, that addresses the topic but may lose focus at points • Demonstrates aspects of development with examples and details although specific details may be lacking or limited • Uses a greater range of vocabulary although some errors in word choice or form may interfere with meaning • Uses simple, compound and complex sentence structures with occasional grammar errors that may interfere with meaning • Shows general control over sentence boundaries and essay format with some errors in spelling and/or mechanics 5 (540): Demonstrates basic competence and control over many aspects of academic writing at the intermediate-high level • Has consistently comprehensible text characterized by essay format • Produces a short, possibly formulaic, essay with an introduction, body and conclusion that maintains focus on the topic • Demonstrates knowledge of how to expand upon a central idea with supporting ideas and specific details although development may be uneven or thin • Has a good command of vocabulary with word choice or form errors occasionally interfering with meaning • Uses a range of sentence and grammatical structures with some errors that rarely interfere with meaning • Shows control over sentence boundaries and essay format with occasional errors in spelling or mechanics 6 (30): Demonstrates competence and control over most aspects of the academic writing process at an advanced-low level • • • • • •
Has text with some depth and complexity Demonstrates good command of essay structure, including a thesis, and the ability to focus on the topic with minimal drifting Produces clearly organized and fully developed paragraphs with specific details and mostly relevant examples, possibly including the use of ideas from others Attempts higher-level vocabulary with occasionally distracting errors in word choice or form that do not interfere with meaning Controls a range of sentence and grammatical structures with occasional errors that do not interfere with meaning Has command of sentence structure and essay format with marginal errors in spelling or mechanics
7 (40): Demonstrates competence and control over most aspects of the academic writing process at the college level • Has text with depth and complexity Chapter 14
51
• • • • •
Demonstrates strong control over essay structure with effective and consistent focus on the topic Uses relevant examples and convincing details, probably including the use of ideas from others Uses higher-level vocabulary with only occasional errors that do not interfere with effective communication Controls a range of sentence structures for stylistic purposes using more complex grammatical structures with occasional errors that do not interfere with effective communication Has command of sentence boundaries and essay format with marginal errors in spelling or mechanics
8: (1B) Demonstrates college-level competence and control over the academic writing process • Has rhetorically effective text • Demonstrates a strong command of rhetorically effective and varied organizational strategies with clear and effective focus on the topic • Uses relevant examples and precise details as support appropriately integrating source material • Uses sophisticated vocabulary with minimal errors • Employs a range of sentence structures and stylistic devices to achieve an effect and has near native-like command of grammar with few or no errors • Has strong command of sentence boundaries, essay format, spelling and mechanics
Chapter 14
52
Reading and Writing Rubric Main Idea, Gives Supporting Details and Inferences Rubric Category Identifies Main Ideas in Reading
4 Attempts to identify the main idea(s); however, the main idea may be stated incorrectly or may be missing
3 Identifies the main idea(s), and includes some supporting details.
2 Identifies the main idea(s) correctly, and includes many supporting details.
Expresses Main Ideas and supporting details
May contain few, incorrect or irrelevant details
Much of the response is copied directly from the text. May contain major inaccuracies Makes a general inference about character(s) and/or event(s) with few/no supporting details or uses irrelevant details
Response is written mostly in the student’s own words. May contain minor inaccuracies
Makes and Fails to make an supports inference, or inferences makes an appropriately inference which is illogical or irrelevant
Makes a general inference about character(s) and/or events(s) with some supporting details, or uses irrelevant details.
1 Clearly and accurately identifies the main idea(s), and includes most of the relevant supporting details Response is written in the student’s own words.
Makes logical and relevant inferences about character(s) and/or event(s). Details from the reading support the inferences made.
Dianne McKay Mission College 9/25/2007
Chapter 14
53
Appendix 5 Resources for Chapter 14 Academic Senate for California Community Colleges (ASCCC). (1997). Good Practice for the Implementation of Prerequisites. Retrieved Jan 25, 2009, from http://www.asccc.org/Publications/Papers/good_practice_prerequis.html Alancraig, M. (2007). Rubric Writing Workbook. Aptos, CA: Author. Angelo, T. A., & Cross, K. P. (1993). Classroom Assessment Techniques: A Handbook for College Teachers. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Retrieved from http://honolulu.hawaii.edu/intranet/committees/FacDevCom/guidebk/teachtip/assess2.htm Collier,V.P. (1994). Language Acquisition for School. Retrieved from http://www.ncela.gwu.edu/pubs/directions/04.htm FLAG Field-Tested Learning Assessment Guide at http://www.flaguide.org/ Handelsman, J, Miller, S., & Pfund, C. (2007). Scientific Teaching. Freeman Publishing: New York, NY Harklau, L. (2003). Generation 1.5 students and college writing. Center for Applied Linguistics. Eric Clearinghouse on Languages and Linguistics. Washington. Retrieved January 29, 2009, from http://www.cal.org/resources/Digest/digest_pdfs/0305harklau.pdf. Intersegmental Committee of Academic Senates (ICAS). (2002 ) Academic Literacy: A Statement of Competencies Expected of Entering Students Entering California’s Public Colleges and Universities. p.42. Retrieved January 29, 2009, from http://www.asccc.org/Publications/Papers/AcademicLiteracy/main.htm Kübler-Ross, E. (1997). On Death and Dying: What the Dying Have to Teach Doctors, Nurses, Clergy, and Their Own Families. Simon and Schuster. Oropesa, R.S., & Landale, N.S. (1997). In Search of the New Second Generation: Alternative Strategies for Identifying Second Generation Children and Understanding Their Acquisition of English. Sociological Perspectives, 40(3), 429-455.
Chapter 14
54
