Characteristics of Surface Radiative Fluxes and Cloud ...

4 downloads 0 Views 1MB Size Report
ative for most of the year and only positive during midsummer in the Arctic. The global net .... the ice station of the Surface Heat Budget of the Arc- tic Ocean ...


第 22 卷 第 4 期 2 0 0 0 年 12 月







JOU RNAL OF GL ACIOLOGY AND GEOCRYOL OGY

V ol. 22 N o. 4 Dec. , 2 0 0 0

Article ID: 1000-0240( 2000) 04-0384-07

Characteristics of Surface Radiative Fluxes and CloudRadiative Forcing with a Focus on the Arctic ( 北极地区地面辐射量和云辐射强迫特征) LIU Feng- jing( 刘凤景) 1, 2 , SU N Jun-ying( 孙俊英) 3 , ZHAN G T ing- jun( 张廷军) 4, CHENG Guo- dong( 程国栋) 2 ( 1. D ep ar t ment of G eography and Insti t ute of A rcti c and A lpi ne Research , Uni v ersi ty of Colorado, Bou lder , C O 80309, USA ; 2. St ate K ey L aboratory of Frozen Soil Engi neeri ng , CA REERI , CAS , L anz hou G ansu 730000, Chi na ; 3. L abor atory of I ce Core and Col d Regi ons E nv ir onmen t , CA REERI , CA S , L anz hou Gansu 730000, China ; 4. Cooper ati ve Insti t ute f or R esearch i n Env ir on me ntal S ciences, U niv ersity of Col orado, Bould er , CO 80309, USA )

Abstract: In this paper t he character istics o f sur face radiativ e flux es and cloud- radiative forcing are review ed w ith a focus o n the Arctic. T hree aspects are addressed, including ( i) changes in radiation flux over the global surface; ( ii) character istics of surface flux es in the A rct ic; and ( iii) character istics o f cloud-r adiative for cing in t he Arctic. T he clouds not only sig nificantly reduce the peak summer radiativ e heat ing of the surface but also r educe the wintertime radiativ e cooling at t he surface in higher latitudes. T he dow nw ard longw ave flux es dominates the incident radiativ e fluxes in the A rctic dur ing most of the y ear. I ncoming shortwave flux es are neglig ible during late fall, w inter and ear ly spring, and even during the midsummer the incoming shor twave fluxes are only slig htly greater than the downward lo ngw ave flux es. T he total net surface radiativ e flux is negative for most of the y ear and only positive during midsummer in the A rct ic. T he g lobal net cloud- radiative forcing is negative, but the cloud- radiative for cing is positive in the Arctic, showing a warming effect , ex cept for a short period in mid- summer. P ositive cloud- radiative forcing in the A rct ic is attributed to the presence of snow and ice with high albedo and the absence of solar r adiation dur ing the polar nig ht. Key words: surface radiative fluxes; cloud- r adiative forcing ; review; Arctic CLC number: P422. 3 Document code: A

1 INT RODU CT ION

- based Eart h [ LL ] Radiat ion Budget Ex periment ( ERBE ) show t hat t he annual mean albedo of t he

T he g lobal cloud distribution is recognized as

nort hern and sout hern hemispheres is nearly t he

forming a m ajor component of t he Earth s clim at e in it s influence on bot h t he energy and moist ure ex-

sam e . T his lack of hemispherical asymmetry in t he

changes in t he eart h - at mosphere system. Clouds

albedo reveals the dominant influence of clouds over

cover approx imately 50% of the surface area of the Earth, and account for about t wo- thirds of t he mean

surf ace ef fects in det ermining t he hemispherical mean albedo, since wit hout t he cloud ef fects the sig nificant

planetary albedo

1

. Observ at ions from t he sat ellit e

2

diff erences in t he surf ace feat ures bet ween the tw o hemispheres w ould have introduced large differences

Recei ved date: 1999- 12-27; Modi fied date: 2000-08- 14 Biography: LIU Feng-jing ( 1964~ ) , male, born in N angong of H ebei Province, graduat ed from Lanzhou U niversit y ( B. S . ) and Lanzhou Inst-i tut e of Glaciology and G eocryology ( M . S . ) , wit h research int erest s in w at er resources and hydrology. E - mail: Fengjing@ col orado. edu

4期

刘凤景等: 北 极地区地面辐射量和云辐射强迫特征

385

in t he hem ispherical albedo. Overall, clouds appear to

tudes, w ith a sect ion describing the eff ect of clouds

cool t he earth - at mosphere syst em according to

on the surf ace radiat ion budget

ERBE observation. T he global mean cooling varied from 14 to 21 W m - 2 bet ween April 1985 and Jan-

recent st udies w ill be present ed here in order t o update Crane and Barry s review , including ( i) changes

uary 1986. Hemispherical, the long wave and short-

in radiat ion f lux over the global surface; ( ii) charac-

w ave cloud f orcing nearly cancel each ot her in the

terist ics of surface f luxes in t he Arct ic; and ( iii) char-

w int er hemisphere, w hile in the summer t he negative shortw ave cloud f orcing is significantly lower than the

acterist ics of cloud- radiat ive forcing in the Arct ic.

posit ive longw ave cloud forcing in magnitudes, pro-

2 CHANGES IN RADIAT ION FL UX OVER T H E GLOBAL SU RFACE

ducing a strong cooling. T hus, clouds signif icantly reduce t he seasonal chang es in t he net radiative heating of the planet

3, 4

.

T he physical processes occurring in the Arctic climate system are in many ways unique compared w it h other regions of t he g lobe, part icularly due to the presence of t he highly reflecting snow and ice, the absence of solar radiat ion for a long port ion of the year, low temperatures and w ater vapor amount s, and presence of t emperat ure inversions 1 . Clouds di rectly af fect surface t em perature and surf ace albe5

do , and also indirectly affect t he st abilit y of t he atmospheric boundary layers and thus t he surface sensi

1

. M ajor results f rom

By using global observat ions of the propert ies of clouds, t he at mosphere and t he surf ace for m any years, Rossow and Zhang calculated global shortw ave and longwave fluxes at the t op of t he at mosphere and at t he surface at a resolut ion of 280 km and 3 hours for every t hird month f rom April 1985 to January 1989 15 . T he results show t hat t he annual mean net radiat ive balance at the surface is heating everyw here ex cept over t he high Antarctic Plateau ( F ig . 1) . T he ba-l ance results from a large shortw ave heating t hat isopposed by a small long wave cooling.

ble and latent flux es 6 . Calculat ions using a one- di mensional t hermodynamic model of sea ice suggest that t he pack ice could t otally melt during summert ime as a result of increasing cloud fraction 7 and al so by increasing the optical dept h of the wint ert ime 8

low er tropospheric ice cryst al clouds . In the Arct ic, t he cloud - radiation feedback is inext ricably linked w it h the snow

ice albedo feedback. It has

been hypot hesized that chang es in surface albedo associated w ith changes in snow and ice cover as a result of tem perature changes provides a signif icant positive feedback on climate change 9 . Over t he Arctic, accurate det ermination of the surface radiat ion fluxes is of part icular import ance due to t he sensit ivit y of snow and ice to the surface radiat ion fluxes

5, 6, 9, 10

net LW ( dashed) , and total net ( dashed- doted line) radiat ive flux es at the surface 15

. Impact of clouds on surface

fluxes and cloud- radiative forcing in t he Arctic have been st udied by many invest ig ators, for example, recent ones including Curry et al . 12

Fig . 1 A nnual, zonal mean values of net SW ( solid) ,

13

11

, Curry and E14

F ig. 2a shows t he annual, January and July zonal mean net radiat ion at surface 15 . T he large seasonal changes are caused almost ent irely by changing t he

bert , Zhang et al . , and T say et al . . Crane and Barry have exhaust ively review ed t he influ-

net shortw ave radiat ion associat ed wit h solar zenith angle variat ion. Not e t hat t he Arctic undergoes weak

ence of clouds on clim at e wit h a focus on high lati

net radiative heat ing at t he surf ace in summer but

386









22 卷

t hat the surface of t he Ant arct ic Plat eau st ill shows a small net radiat ive cooling even in summer. Comparing F igures 2a and 2b shows t hat clouds not only signif icantly reduce the peak summer radiat ive heat ing of t he surf ace but also shif t t he polew ard edge of t he peak heat ing zone equatorw ard by about 30 of lat itude. At t he same time, clouds reduce t he w intertime radiat ive cooling at t he surface at higher lat itudes and shift the equatorw ard edge of t he cooling zone t oward t he pole by about 10 of lat it ude. T he patt ern of zonal mean cloud flux chang e show s t he major cloud zones and their seasonal shift s more clearly ( Fig. 2c) . T he cloud change of net radiation is primarily a short w ave flux change result ing in a decrease of net radiation relat ive t o clear condit ions in summer, but t he w eak longw ave eff ect s play a more important role in the high lat it udes of the w inter hemisphere, causing an increase of net radiat ion relat ive to clear condit ions in w inter ( F ig . 2c) . Ramanat han et al . found t hat in April 1985 t he short wave radiation cloud f orcing peaked in midlat-i tudes, unlike the longw ave forcing w hich peaked over t he t ropics 16 . In t he t ropics, large negative values w ere observed in t he tropical monsoon and deep convect ive reg ions. T he shortw ave forcing was also large nort h of 30 N in t he Atlantic and P acif ic. In t hese regions, the reduct ion of absorbed solar radiat ion as a result of clouds exceeded 100 W m - 2 . T able 1 cont ains some global cloud forcing estimates f rom ERBE data. When clouds are present , t he at mospheric column radiat es less t herm al energy and reflects more solar radiat ive flux es int o space than it w ould clear .

if

t he

skies

w ere

T he preliminary analyses of the dat a for f our

Table 1 Comparison of global cloud f orcing estimates using ERBE data ( W m - 2) A pril 1985

F ig. 2 Annual ( thin solid lines) , Januar y ( dashed lines) , and July ( thick solid lines) zonal mean v alues of ( a) fullsky net r adiative flux es, ( b) clear sky net fluxes, and ( c) cloud changes of net fluxes at the surface as a function of latitude 15

16, 17

July 1985 O ctober 1985 January 1986

Longw ave cloud f orcing

31. 3

30. 0

32. 0

30. 6

Short wave cloud f orcing

- 44. 5

- 46. 4

- 49. 4

- 51. 9

N et cloud f orcing

- 13. 2

- 16. 4

- 17. 4

- 21. 3

4期

刘凤景等: 北 极地区地面辐射量和云辐射强迫特征

387

mont hs show n in T able 1 conf irm t hat clouds have a

short wave fluxes are only slightly g reat er than t he

net cooling ef fect on t he global climat e.

dow nw ard longw ave flux es. Net shortw ave and long-

3 CHARACT ERIST ICS OF SU RFACE RADIAT IVE FL UXES IN T HE ARCT IC

w ave surf ace fluxes are g iven in F ig. 4. It is seen t hat t he t otal net radiat ive flux is negat ive for most of t he year and only posit ive during m idsummer.

T he most comprehensive in sit u measurem ent s of the surface radiat ion balance over t he Arct ic are the Russian measurements made f rom drif t ing ice st at ions 18~ 20 and t he most recent measurements from the ice st at ion of t he Surface Heat Budget of the Arct ic Ocean ( SH EBA)

21

. T he early observat ions f rom 22

Russia were assessed and int erpreted by F letcher . F let cher inf erred that values report ed by M ashunova

18

are the most com plete and reliable ( F ig. 3) .

F ig. 4

Annual cycle of modeled net shortw av e

and long wave flux es at the surface 12

T he modeled incoming shortw ave fluxes show ex cellent agreement w it h t he M ashunova values 18 , w it h t he modeled dow nw ard longw ave flux es not agreeing quite well w it h M ashunova s values ( Fig. 3) . T he discrepancies betw een t he model and Marshunova s w intertime longw ave v alues presumably ref lect Fig. 3

Annual cycle of the modeled inco ming shor twave

and downward longw ave fluxes at the surface

12

. Dots and

diamo nds corr espond to LW and SW v alues, r espectiv ely, as determined by M ashunova

18

. ( T he day starts on

Januar y 1; the follow ing figur es ar e the same as this one)

diff erences in the assumed phase of the condensate and the cont ribution of clear- sky ice crystal precip-i t at ion. T he summertime discrepancies in surf ace longw ave flux possibly ref lect dif ferences in cloud height , cloud- base temperature, and/ or cloud emissivit y. Com parison of t he sat ellit e

derived surf ace

By using available data on cloud f ract ion and

f lux es using ISCCP clouds w ith t he aforementioned

cloud microphysical propert ies, Curry and Ebert derived the annual cycles of surface temperature, sur-

Curry and Ebert analysis are show n in F ig. 5 and F ig. 6, w here t he surface radiat ive fluxes were deter-

f ace albedo, and cloud f ract ion and cloud opt ical prop-

mined follow ing Rossow and Zhang

erties, and furt her determined t he surf ace f luxes by

t here is agreement to w it hin 10 ~ 20 W m -

coupling the radiat ive calculations t o a one - dimensional t hermodynamic sea- ice model ( for 80 N) 12 .

April, the incoming shortw ave fluxes of t he ISCCP values in July are about 40 W m - 2 hig her than

As show n in F ig . 3, the dow nw ard longw ave f lux es

t hat f ound by Curry and Ebert , primarily because of

dominat es t he incident radiat ive f luxes in t he Arctic during most of t he year. Incoming shortw ave f lux es

t he much low er sum mert ime cloud cover in the ISC-

15

. Although 2

in

w inter and early

CP analysis ( F ig. 5) . How ever, t he higher surf ace albedo in the ISCCP analysis produces almost t he

spring, andeven during the midsummer the incoming

sam e net short w ave f luxes at t he surf ace as found by

are negli gible during late fall,



388

Curry and Ebert.



W m



22 卷

T he agreement of downw ard

long wave flux es at surf ace in July is w it hin about 1 0 - 2



despit e the larg e dif ferences in cloud cover

because t he clouds included in the ISCCP analysis, al t houg h they have hig her tops t han the clouds t hat are missed, have about the same base heig ht s in t hese

4 CHARACT ERIST ICS OF CLOUD- RADIAT IVE FORCING IN TH E ARCT IC Ramanat han et al . def ined t he cloud longw ave ( C LW ) and short w ave ( C SW ) radiat ive f orcing to be

calculations ( F ig . 6) . In wint ert ime, t he ISCCP

C LW = F ( A c ) - F( 0)

analysis overest imates t he downward longw ave f lux es relat ive to Curry and Ebert because the clouds have

C SW = Q ( A c) - Q( 0)

much higher optical thickness. How ever, in t he ISC-

Where A c is t he cloud fract ion and Q and F are t he short wave and longw ave flux es, respect ively ( note

CP analysis t he surf ace temperatures, w hich are w armer t han t hat of Curry and Ebert , produce larger

t hat here the radiat ive f luxes are defined to be posit ive

outgoing long wave fluxes so t hat t he net surface f luxes in bot h Curry and Ebert Z hang

15

12

agree t o w ithin 10 W m

and Rossow and - 2

16

dow nw ard) . T he values of cloud f orcing are negat ive for cooling and posit ive for w arming. T he net cloud forcing, C , is t he sum

.

C = C LW + C SW Using t he aforement ioned model of t he at mosphere and sea ice syst em, Curry and Ebert evaluat ed t he cloud radiat ive forcing at t he surf ace ( F ig. 12

7) . Strong seasonal variat ions w ere determined for surf ace C SW , w it h lit t le variation in C LW , resulting in a strong annual variation in C . Values of surface C are positive except for tw o weeks in midsummer. Over t he course of the y ear, clouds have a net w arming eff ect on t he surface in the Arct ic; this is in conFig . 5 A nnual cycle of incoming surface shortw ave r adiative flux for 80 N. Curry and Ebert Rosso w and Zhang

15

12

analysis ( heav y solid) .

analysis based on ISCCP for four

t rast to low er lat it udes, w here clouds have a net coo-l ing effect . T his difference arises due to absence of solar radiat ion during t he polar

months in 1985 ( thin solid) ; smoot hed annual cycle fit to the four- month ISCCP analysis ( dashed)

Fig. 7

Annual cycle of mo deled cloud forcing at the surface 12

Fig . 6 A nnual cycle of downward surface longw av e radiative flux for 80 N. Curry and Ebert Rossow and Zhang

15

12

analysis ( heav y solid) .

analysis basedon ISCCP fo r four

months in 1985 ( thin solid ) ; smoot hed annual cycle fit to the four- month ISCCP analysis ( dashed)

night and due to the hig h surface albedo of the sea ice. It is noted here t hat C SW and t hus C are strongly sensit ive to t he value of surf ace albedo. By using the data from the Arct ic Stratus Cloud

4期

刘凤景等: 北 极地区地面辐射量和云辐射强迫特征

389

Table 2 Shortwave, longwave and net cloud forcing over dif ferent geotypes determined from AVHRR data ( W m

- 2

)

Ice/

O cean/

O cean/

Lan d/

Snow

Land

Ice

Snow

- 108. 5

- 35. 3

- 115. 6

- 80. 5

- 69. 1

19. 7

33. 1

9. 6

25. 3

12. 6

15. 2

- 100. 7

- 75. 4

- 25. 7

- 90. 3

- 67. 9

- 53. 9

O cean

Land

SW cloud f orcing

- 120. 4

LW cloud forcing N et cloud f orcing

Ex periment collect ed on June 20 and 28 in 1980,

over land and ocean have the larg est mag nitudes, and

T say et al . provided tabulat ing results of fluxes for solar and near - inf rared radiat ion w it h various com-

over ice the mag nitude is the smallest. T he largest

ponents in the at mospheric profiles

14

. T he net

longw ave forcing is over land, w here temperatures are w armest , and t he sm allest forcing is over ice. T he

cloud- radiat ive forcing at surface, aft er recalculat ing, are 278 W m - 2 for June 20 and 373 W m - 2 for

net cloud forcing is neg at ive for all geot ypes and may

June 28, show ing a cooling effect . It is f urther in-

is based on midsummer data.

f erred t hat a clear sky condit ion results in more avail able dow nward f lux for snow m elt than does a cloudy

5

be explained for snow and ice because the calculat ion

CONCLU SIONS

sky condit ion in June. Zhang et al . investigated the impact of clouds on surface radiative fluxes and snowmelt in t he Arct ic and subarct ic f rom March to M ay and concluded t hat during t he period of

Globally, t he annual mean net radiat ive balance at the surface is heating everywhere ex cept over t he high Antarct ic plat eau. T he clouds not only signif-i

snowmelt in the Arct ic and subarct ic clouds t rend to

cant ly reduce the peak summer radiative heating of

at tenuate incoming short w ave radiat ion less t han clouds w hich enhance dow nw ard longw ave radiat ion,

t he surf ace but also reduce the w intertime radiat ive

resulting

on

w ard longw ave fluxes dominat e t he incident radiat ive

snowmelt . T he discrepancy betw een t hem arises ow ing to diff erence in surface albedo. T he albedo

f lux es in t he Arct ic during most of t he year. Incom-

used by Zhang et al . ( > 0. 8) is much higher t han

w inter and early spring, and even during the m id-

that used by T say et al . ( 0. 57) as the data of Zhang

summer the incoming short w ave f luxes are only

et al . is at least one and half months earlier t han the dat a of T say et al . Actually , both analyses are con-

slig ht ly greater t han t he downward longw ave f luxes. T he tot al net surface radiative flux is negat ive for

in

a

w arming

ef fect

of

cloud

13

sistent w it h Curry and Ebert

12

, w hose data shows

cooling at the surface at higher lat it udes. T he dow n-

ing shortw ave fluxes are negligible during lat e f all,

most of the year and only positive during midsummer

that over the course of the year the net cloud forcing at the surf ace is posit ive ex cept f or tw o weeks in mid-

in the Arct ic.

sum mer.

t ive forcing of bot h shortw ave and longw ave, w ith

T he net cloud- radiative forcing varies over diff erent geot ypes at t he surface because each geotype has

negative values f or shortw ave radiation and posit ive

it s unique albedo. L i et al . studied t he scene identifi

net cloud- radiat ive forcing is negative, the cloud-

cat ion and it s impact on cloud radiative forcing using

radiat ive forcing is posit ive in the Arctic, show ing a

AVHRR ( Advanced Very H igh Resolut ion Radiomet er) data 23 . T able 2 list s short wave, longw ave and

w arming effect , except for a short period in midsummer. Positive cloud- radiat ive forcing in the Arc-

net cloud radiat ive forcing over land, ocean, snow

t ic is att ributed t o t he presence of snow and ice w ith

andice for 4 days in July 1985 in the region nort h of 67. 5 N. As expect ed, shortw ave cloud forcing

high albedo and t he absence of solar radiat ion during

Clouds have a signif icant impact on surf ace radia-

values for long wave radiat ion. Alt hough the global

t he polar night .

390





Acknowledgments:

冻 11

References: 1

2

3

R amanathan V . The role of eart h radiat ion budget st udies in cli mat e and general circulat ion research [ J] . Journal of G eophysical

4

5

Curry J A, Ebert E E. Annual cycle of radiat ion fluxes over t he A rctic O cean: sensit ivit y t o cloud optical properties [ J] . Journal of Climat e, 1992, 5: 1 267~ 1 273.

13

Zhang T J, St amnes K , Bow ing S A. Impact of clouds on surface radiat ive f luxes and snow melt in t he A rct ic and subarctic

14

15

16

7

G eophysical R esearch , 1995, 100: 1 167~ 1 197. Ramanat han V , Cess R D, Harrison E F, et al . Cloud radiat ive f orcing and climat e: R esults from t he Earth Radiat ion Budget Experiment [ J] . S cience, 1989, 243: 57~ 63.

17

t ernational G eophysics Series, V ol. 54 [ C] . New York: Academic Press, 1993. 151~ 173.

Lockw ood J G . Clouds and the at mospheric radiat ion balance [ J ] . Progress in Physical Geography, 1990, 14( 1) : 89~ 96.

18

M arshunova M S. Principle regularit ies of t he radiation balance of t he underlying surf ace an d of the atmosphere in t he Arctic [ A ] .

Sh ine K P, Henderson - Sellers A . The sensit ivit y of a t hermodynamic sea ice model t o changes in surface albedo param eteriza-

Flet cher J O , K eller B, Olenicof f S M . Soviet D ata on t he Arct ic Heat Budget and its Climat ic Inf luence [ C ] . The Rand Corporat ion, RM - 5003- PR, 1961. 51~ 132.

Ebert E E. R adiat ive interact ions bet w een A rct ic sea ice and boundary layer st rat us clouds [ D ] . U niversity of W iscinsinM adison, 1984. Ebert E E, Curry J A. A n int ermediate one- dimensional t hermodynamic sea ice model for invest igat ing ice- atmosphere int er-

19

Curry J A , Ebert E E. Sensit ivit y of th e thickn ess of A rct ic sea ice t o t he opt ical propert ies of clouds [ J] . A nnals of G laciology,

9

1990, 14: 43~ 46. Curry J A , R ossow W B, Randall D , Schram m J L. O verview

10

of Arct ic cloud and radiat ion charat erist ics [ J] . Journal of Cli mat e, 1996, 9: 1 731~ 1 764. M aykut G A , U nt ersteiner N . Some results f rom a time dependent thermodynamic model of sea ice [ J] . Journal of G eophysical R esearch, 1971, 76: 1 550~ 1 575.

Chernigovskiy N T. The main charact eristics of t he radiat ion cl-i mat e of the cent ral A rctic [ J ] . A ct inometry, At mospheric O ptics and Nuclear M et eorology, A kademiya N auk Lit ovskoy U SSR , 1964, 23 ( N A SA Tech. T ransl. F- 150, June 1964) .

20

actions [ J] . Journal of G eophysical Research, 1993, 98: 10 085 ~ 10 109. 8

Rossow W B, Zhang Y - C. Calculat ion of surface and t op- of at mosphere radiative fluxes from physical quant ities based on ISCCP dat aset s, part : validat ion and first result s [ J] . Journal of

18 687~ 18 703. H artmann D L. R adiat ive eff ect s of clouds on Earth s climat e [ A ] . Hobbs P V . Aerosol - Cloud - Climat e Interact ions, In-

t ion [ J] . Journal of G eophysical R esearch, 1984, 90: 2 243~ 2 250. 6

[ J] . Journal of Climat e, 1996, 9: 2 110~ 2 123. Tsay S C, Stamnes K , Jayaw eera K . Radiative energy budget in t he cloudy and hazy Arct ic [ J] . Journal of th e A tmospheric Sc-i ences, 1989, 46( 7) : 1 002~ 1 018.

R esearch, 1987, 92: 4 076~ 4 095. Harrison E F, M inn is P, Barkstrom B R. Seasonal variation of cloud radiat ive forcing derived from t he Eart h R adiat ion Budget Ex perim ent [ J] . Journal of Geophysical Research, 1990, 95:

Curry J A , Schramm J L, Ebert E E. Impact of clouds on t he

12

Crane R G , Barry R G. T he influence of clouds on climat e wit h a f ocus on high lat it ude int eractions [ J] . Journal of Cl imatology, 1984, 4: 71~ 93.

22 卷

surf ace radiat ion balance of the Arct ic ocean [ J ] . M et eorology and A tmospheric Physics, 1993, 51: 197~ 217.

T his work w as support ed by the Polar Research Off ice of State Oceanic Bureau and t he Chinese Academy of Sciences ( KZ951- A1- 205) .



21

22

V ow inckel E, Orvig S. Radiation balance of t he t roposphere and of t he eart h- atm osphere syst em in t he A rct ic [ M ] . M cG ill U niversity, 1964( A FCRL 64~ 35) . Perovich D K , A ndreas E L, Curry J A , et al . 1999: Y ear on ice gives climate insight s [ J ] . EOS ( T ransact ion , A GU ) , 1999, 80( 41) : 481~ 484. Fl etcher J O . T he heat budget of t he Arct ic basin and its relat ion to climat e [ R ] . 175.

23

T he R and Corporation, R-444-PR, 1965.

Li Z Q , Leight on H G . Scene identif icat ion an d it s eff ect on cloud radiat ive f orcing in t he A rctic [ J] . Journal of G eophysical Research, 1991, 96: 9 175~ 9 188.