children's social evaluations

Download PDF
13 downloads 0 Views 1MB Size Report
Comment
g T ime (sec.) 0. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. Kuhlmeier et al. (2003). 0. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Hamlin et al. (2007). 0. 1. 2. 3. 4. Hinten et al. (2016). Results. HELPER. HINDERER ...
CHILDREN’S SOCIAL EVALUATIONS

Ashley E. Hinten & Damian Scarf

Nurture

Nature

Study infants  understand where humans begin morally.

Violation of Expectation longer looking = something unexpected happened Consistency

Normalcy

Human behaviour is predictable. Efficiency

Paradigm

Eye-Tracking

Hill Paradigm HELP

HINDER

APPROACH

HELPER HINDERER

Mean Looking Time (sec.)

8

Results 6

7

4

5

6

3 4

5 4

2

3

3

2

2

1 1

1 0

0

0 Kuhlmeier et al. (2003)

Hamlin et al. (2007)

Hinten et al. (2016)

Replication = core feature of science

Potential Explanations 1. Not mutually exclusive

Like helper

2. Forgiveness Norms

Surprised hinderer approached

3. Lab Effect

Morality is not black and white.