Conditional expression of the dominantnegative ... - Wiley Online Library

19 downloads 0 Views 1MB Size Report
Jan 30, 2013 - TGF-b signaling in K141 cells, invasive carcinomas developed on the ventral surface of the tip of the ...... NUT midline carcinoma by epigenomic.
DEVELOPMENTAL DYNAMICS 242:444–455, 2013

RESEARCH ARTICLE

a

Conditional Expression of the DominantNegative TGF-b Receptor Type II Elicits Lingual Epithelial Hyperplasia in Transgenic Mice

Developmental Dynamics

Feng Li1* and Mingliang Zhou2

Background: The transforming growth factor-b (TGF-b) signaling pathway is generally believed to be a potent inhibitor of proliferation. However, many epithelia lacking the essential Tgfbr2 gene still maintain normal tissue homeostasis. Here, transgenic mice expressing rtTA from the human keratin 14 (K14) promoter were used to generate an inducible dominant-negative TGF-b receptor type II (Tgfbr2) mutant model, which allowed us to distinguish between the primary and secondary effects of TGF-b signaling disruption by Doxycycline treatment in K141 epithelial stem cells. Results: We showed that in mice lacking TGF-b signaling in K141 cells, invasive carcinomas developed on the ventral surface of the tip of the tongue, while filiform papillae on the dorsal surface showed different pathological changes from the tip to the posterior of the tongue. In addition, acetylation levels of histone H4 and histone H3 rapidly increased, while pMAPK activity was enhanced and Jagged2 inactivated in lingual epithelia after disruption of TGF-b signaling. Conclusions: Our results contribute to the understanding of TGF-b signaling in regulating homeostasis and carcinogenesis in lingual epithelia. Developmental Dynamics 242:444–455, C 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. 2013. V Key words: TGF-b signaling; lingual epithelia; adult tongue; keratin 14; papillae Key Findings:  Mice lacking TGF-b signaling in K141 cells during 35 days of TGF-b signaling disruption develop invasive carcinoma on the ventral surface of the tip of the tongue, while filiform papillae on the dorsal surface show different pathological changes from the tip to the posterior of the tongue.  Acetylation levels of histone H4 and histone H3 rapidly increase in the tip of the tongue after disruption of TGF-b signaling.  pMAPK activity is enhanced and Jagged2 inactivated in lingual epithelia after 3 days of TGF-b signaling disruption. Accepted 14 January 2013

INTRODUCTION The mouse tongue is known to contain four types of papillae, filiform,

fungiform, circumvallate (CV), and foliate, with the filiform papillae being the most abundant type

(Cameron, 1966; Delay et al., 1986; Kinnamon et al., 1985), but the mechanism of papillae formation remains

Additional Supporting Information may be found in the online version of this article. 1 School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, People’s Republic of China 2 Monell Chemical Senses Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania Contract grant sponsor: National Institutes of Health; Contract grant number: R01 DC007487; Contract grant sponsor: National Science Foundation; Contract grant number: DBJ-0216310; Contract grant sponsor: Shanghai Municipal Education Commission. Contract grant sponsor: Technological Innovation Projects; Contract grant number: 08YZ42. *Correspondence to: Feng Li, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 280 South Chongqing Road, Shanghai 200025, People’s Republic of China. E-mail: [email protected] or [email protected] DOI: 10.1002/dvdy.23933 Published online 30 January 2013 in Wiley Online Library (wileyonlinelibrary.com).

C 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. V

Developmental Dynamics

TGF-b PROMOTES CARCINOMA IN LINGUAL EPITHELIA 445

unclear. Recent studies have implicated multiple signaling pathways in the regulation of epithelial stem cell proliferation, such as the Wnt (Blanpain et al., 2007; Lowry et al., 2005), Notch (Fre et al., 2005), and Bone Morphogenetic Protein (BMP) pathways (Andl et al., 2004). Moreover, it has also been reported that components of the TGF-b (Nakamura et al., 2009), Notch (Seta, 2005), and b-Catenin/Wnt (Liu et al., 2007; Schneider et al., 2010) signaling pathways are expressed in lingual epithelia and/or taste buds (TB). Several investigations have provided evidence for an important role of TGF-b in this orchestration of signals (Bierie and Moses, 2006; Blokzijl et al., 2003; Falk et al., 2008; Shi and Massague, 2003; Siegel and Massague, 2003). TGF-b, which signals through activation of TGF-b receptors type I and II (Tgfb r1 and Tgfb r2) and phosphorylation of the signaling mediators Smad2 and Smad3, elicits multiple cellular responses, including a cytostatic effect on various cell types (Bierie and Moses, 2006; Siegel and Massague, 2003). In cultured epithelial cells, TGF-b molecules act as potent inhibitors of proliferation and show tumor suppressor characteristics (Cameron et al., 1989; Cameron et al., 1997). Given the ascribed effects of TGF-b signaling on growth inhibition, many normal epithelia are still observed when conditional targeting of the Tgfbr2 gene is performed (Bhowmick et al., 2004; Cheng et al., 2005; Forrester et al., 2005; Guasch et al., 2007). However, it is surprising that ablation of Tgfbr2 in stromal fibroblasts generates spontaneous invasive cell carcinomas (SQCC) of the forestomach epithelium (Nolasco et al., 1987). Other strategies used to analyze the function of TGF-b signaling are dominant-negative mutants and an overexpression transgenic mouse model. However, results have often been conflicting, and the interplay between extrinsic and intrinsic factors may contribute to some of these disparate results (Amendt et al., 1998, 2002; Cui et al., 1995, 1996; Frugier et al., 2005; Wang et al., 1997). Recent studies have further suggested several functions of TGF-b signaling in vivo through conditional targeting of the Tgfbr2 gene, such as shortening of the

cell cycle without changing cell fate (Falk et al., 2008). Given the reported effects of TGF-b signaling on growth inhibition and cell cycle, it is very surprising that K14Cre/Tgfbr2 conditional knockout mice are viable and appear phenotypically normal through early adulthood. Interestingly, it is rectal and genital epithelia, not skin epithelia, that develop SQCC with age in these mice (Guasch et al., 2007). Thus far, no reports have shown the effect of TGFb signaling on the proliferation of lingual epithelia and papillae in the adult tongue. In the current study, we used a keratin 14 (K14) promoter to conditionally disrupt TGF-b signaling. After crossing with a transgenic mouse line carrying an EGFP-pBi-DeltaTgfbr2 construct (PTR) (Frugier et al., 2005), the progeny express rtTA under the control of a cell-type-specific promoter, which leads to cell-type-specific expression of a dominant-negative TGF-b receptor. In a previous study using this model, we showed that K14 is differentially expressed from the tip to the posterior along the surface of the tongue, and a cell migration stream was revealed in lingual epithelia and filiform papillae (Li and Zhou, 2012). Here, we further showed that mice lacking TGF-b signaling in K14positive cells developed invasive carcinoma in the ventral surface of the tongue tip. By contrast, Tgfbr2 mutant lingual epithelia on the dorsal surface of the tongue were phenotypically normal, although filiform papillae showed different pathological changes from the tip to the posterior of the tongue. We also investigated changes in epigenetic modifications and signaling pathways when TGF-b signaling was disrupted in an effort to understand the intrinsic and extrinsic factors affecting the development/differentiation of lingual stem cell/progenitors.

RESULTS Disruption of TGF-b Signaling Promotes Invasive Carcinoma on Tip of Tongue After 35 Days of TGF-b Signaling Disruption Multiple stem cell populations have been described in a previous cell genesis model of the tongue, including

K14þ and Sox2þ progenitor cells (Okubo et al., 2006, 2009). K14þ cells continuously give rise to both mature TB receptor cells and surrounding keratinocytes (Okubo et al., 2009). Many studies have reported that the normal epidermal phenotype is still present after targeted and conditional expression of the Tgfbr2 gene in K14or K5-positive cells, and oncogenic transformation with Ha-Ras is required to promote invasive SQCC (Guasch et al., 2007; Lu et al., 2006). In order to further investigate the nature of K14þ progenitor cells in lingual epithelia, we crossed K14-rtTA (X-linked K14-rtTA transgene) mice with PTR mice (Xie et al., 1999). The double-transgenic K14-rtTA-PTR mice specifically express K14 in the lingual epithelia and also co-express EGFP and the dominant-negative DTgfbr2 genes upon treatment with Doxycycline (Dox) (see Supp. Fig. S1, which is available online) (Frugier et al., 2005). Adult K14-rtTA-PTR mice were exposed to Dox and sacrificed at 5 hr, 9 hr, 1 day, 3 days, 7 days, 35 days, and 75 days after induction (Supp. Fig. S1). As the rtTA protein is retained in daughter cells originating from K14þ progenitors due to a shortened cell cycle after disruption of TGF-b signaling (Falk et al., 2008; Li and Zhou, 2012), Dox induction should continually induce GFP expression in those daughter cells (Supp. Fig. S1). With extended exposure to Dox, mutated cells should gradually be found in the lingual epithelia and papillae. By observing the morphology of lingual epithelia and papillae, we were able to investigate the role of TGF-b signaling on maintaining the homeostasis of lingual epithelia and filiform papillae. First, the expression levels of keratin 14 (K14) and Tgfbr2 were observed by immunostaining. Immunostaining with anti-K14 showed that K14 was expressed in lingual epithelia covering the fungiform papillae, TB, and connective tissue of filiform papillae and fungiform papillae. It should be noted that K14 expression was detected along the basal membrane (Supp. Fig. S2A and B). As expected, Tgfbr2 expression was also detected in lingual epithelia, papillae, and TB. However, expression of the

446 LI AND ZHOU

surface (Supp. Fig. S4M), while the invasion of lingual epithelia was observed on the ventral surface (Fig. 1D and Supp. Fig. S4N). The current results collectively showed that 24 hr of TGF-b signaling disruption interfered with the formation of filiform papillae, which recovered by day 3, while 35 days of TGF-b signaling disruption severely inhibited the formation of filiform papillae on the dorsal surface and promoted development of invasive carcinoma on the ventral surface of the tongue tip.

Developmental Dynamics

Fig. 1. Tongue tip histology. Hematoxylin-stained section from the tongue tip (frontal section) of animals without Dox treatment (A) or with Dox treatment for 24 hr, 7 days, and 35 days (B–D, respectively). B: After 24 hr, abnormal filiform papillae were found on the dorsal surface and ventral surface. C: After day 7, abnormal filiform papillae continued to be seen on the dorsal surface and ventral surface. D: After day 35, abnormal filiform papillae were still found in the dorsal surface, and epithelial cells had invaded into the connective tissue on the ventral surface. Scale bar ¼ (A–C) 200 mm; (D) 500 mm.

Tgfbr2 gene was obviously different from that of K14, which was confined to suprabasal cells (Supp. Fig. S2C and D). Our previous study revealed that GFP expression (representing cells with disrupted TGF-b signaling) was obviously distributed throughout the dorsal surface and in both papillaeand non-papillae-containing areas of the ventral surface of the tongue. Further analysis showed that GFP expression was variable, depending on the location of the tongue, papillae, and the time of Dox induction (Li and Zhou, 2012). Meanwhile, we observed GFP expression in the back skin of the mice, as expected (Supp. Fig. S3A). Another study has shown that constitutive expression of activated ErbB2 driven by the K14 promoter induces hair follicle abnormalities and severe skin hyperplasia in transgenic mice (Xie et al., 1999). The mice in this study had bleeding skin from day 30 (Supp. Fig. S3B), and their condition had deteriorated to such a degree with necrotizing ears and bleeding skin that ethical concerns mandated sacrificing them by day 75. In order to further investigate the effect of TGF-b signaling on the differentiation/development of lingual epithelial cells, we focused on their morphological changes and that of papillae throughout the tongue in the current study. The tongue was separated into three parts: (1) tip of tongue, 1.0 mm; (2) middle of tongue

and posterior of tongue including the “V” region; (3) posterior of tongue near CV papillae. Histological sections were made in three different planes to separate the three parts: (1) frontal section for the tip of the tongue; (2) sagittal section along the mid-line for the middle-posterior tongue; (3) horizontal section for the posterior tongue containing CV papillae. The morphological changes of filiform papillae and lingual epithelia were observed at five sites (sites 1–5) (Supp. Fig. S3C) and are described below in turn from anterior to posterior after disruption of TGF-b signaling over time. The frontal section of the tongue tip (site 1) was first observed. It is well known that abundant papillae cover the surface of the tongue tip. Two main types, fungiform and filiform papillae, could be observed on the dorsal surface (Fig. 1A and S4A), ventral surface (Supp. Fig. S4B), and side surface (Supp. Fig. S4C). After 24 hr of TGF-b signaling disruption, the ordered arrangement of the hookshaped filiform papillae was lost on the dorsal surface (Supp. Fig. S4D) as well as on the ventral surface (Supp. Fig. S4E). After 3 days (Supp. Fig. S4G–I) or 7 days (Fig. 1C and Supp. Fig. S4J–L) of TGF-b signaling disruption, abnormal filiform papillae continued to be observed. After 35 days of TGF-b signaling disruption, the formation of filiform papillae was significantly blocked on the dorsal

Hyper-Proliferation of Lingual Epithelia Occurs From the Middle to Posterior of Tongue After TGF-b Signaling Disruption According to traditional Chinese medicine, observations of the tongue surface (dorsal surface) can provide strong visual indicators of an individual’s overall harmony or disharmony (Liu et al., 2003; Wu et al., 2005). Our previous study revealed that K14 expression varies along the tongue within 3 days of Dox induction (Li and Zhou, 2012). Given the above hypothesis, one can speculate that different pathological changes may be observed along the tongue after disruption of TGF-b signaling over time in the same Dox induction model (Li and Zhou, 2012). Along the dorsal surface of the tongue, a large number of filiform papillae were observed in control mice (Fig. 2A,B and Supp. Fig. S5A). After 5 hr of TGF-b signaling disruption, hyper-proliferation of lingual epithelia was seen in the “V” region of the posterior tongue (Fig. 2C and D). After 24 hr of TGF-b signaling disruption, the hyper-proliferation of lingual epithelia was still present (Fig. 2E and F). Meanwhile, many keratinized fila accumulated on the surface of the tongue (Supp. Fig. S5B and C). After 3 days of TGF-b signaling disruption, the hyper-proliferation of lingual epithelia ceased, and we also failed to observe the orderly arrangement of filiform papillae in the “V” region of posterior tongue, which normally points posteriorly (Fig. 3G). In the middle tongue, thickened epithelia on the dorsal surface was observed after

Developmental Dynamics

TGF-b PROMOTES CARCINOMA IN LINGUAL EPITHELIA 447

Fig. 2. Histology of the middle-posterior tongue (low magnification). Hematoxylin-stained section from the middle-posterior tongue (sagittal section) of animals without Dox treatment (A, B) or with Dox treatment for 5 hr (C, D), 24 hr (E, F), and 3 days (G, H), respectively. In the posterior tongue from control mice, many filiform papillae were observed in lingual epithelia (B). After 5 hr (D) or 24 hr (F) of TGF-b signaling disruption, hyper-proliferation of filiform papillae was observed in the posterior tongue. After 3 days of TGF-b signaling disruption, hyper-proliferation of filfiorm papillae disappeared (H). Scale bar ¼ 500 mm.

disruption of TGF-b signaling (Fig. 3B–G), compared with control mice (Fig. 3A). As expected, lingual epithelia were significantly thickened after

35 days of TGF-b signaling (Fig. 3E,G). On the other hand, the striated muscle cells under the lingual epithelia were arranged in a disorderly

manner after disruption of TGF-b signaling (Fig. 3B–E), compared with control mice (Fig. 3A). In the posterior tongue containing CV papillae (site

448 LI AND ZHOU

Developmental Dynamics

Acetylation Levels of Histone H4 and Histone H3 Rise Rapidly in Lingual Epithelia After Disruption of TGF-b Signaling

Fig. 3. Histology of the middle tongue (higher magnification). Hematoxylin stained section from the tongue tip (saggital section) of animals without Dox treatment (A) and with Dox treatment for 5 hr (B), 9 hr (C), 24 hr (D), 3 days (E), and 35 days (F). Note the pathological changes in the connective tissues under the lingual epithelia (A–E, arrows). Arrows indicate the connective tissue and muscle tissue under the dorsal surface of tongue, which show the pathological changes since 5 hr Dox induction. G: The thickness of lingual epithelia in the middle tongue significantly increased after 5 hr of TGF-b signaling disruption (a, b: P < 0.05; c, d: P < 0.05). Scale bar ¼ 200 mm.

5), hyper-proliferation of lingual epithelia was also observed after 35 days of TGF-b signaling disruption (Fig. 4B). In essence, the hyper-proliferation of epithelia was observed on the dorsal surface of the middle-posterior

tongue, including the area containing the CV papillae after 35 days of TGFb signaling disruption. Unexpectedly, the disruption of TGF-b signaling quickly ( 0.05). B, basal cell layer; CT, connective tissue; FuP, fungiform papillae; FP, filiform papillae. Scale bar ¼ 50 mm.

disrupted by application of RU486 to the oral cavity daily for 5 days. However, activation of either K-ras or H-ras in combination with the deletion of Tgfbr2 induces squamous cell carcinoma of head-and-neck epithelia (Lu et al., 2006). The K14-Cre-Tgfbr2 CKO mice are viable and appear phenotypically normal through early adulthood, and the loss of Tgfbr2 does not affect back skin epidermis and the appendages. However, adult K14-Tgfbr2 null mice develop SQCCs in their anal and genital regions, displaying visible signs of tumor formation with age. Further histological analyses revealed frequent spontaneous SQCCs arising in this model within transitional zones between two merging but distinct epithelial tissue types (Guasch et al., 2007). We speculate that there may be different connective tissues under the dorsal or ventral surface of the tongue, which contribute to the different pathological changes between these two locations. Indeed, we observed pathological changes of connective tissues under the dorsal surface in the first half of the tongue after TGF-b signaling disruption. Previous tissue recombination studies have also demonstrated that the reciprocal inductive interactions between the mesenchyme and the overlying epithelium are indispensable for the fate induction of various epithelia (Blanpain et al., 2007). Although the Tgfbr2 gene is conditionally disrupted, many epithelia still develop normally. When carcinogenesis protocols are applied to transgenic mice or CKO mice that disrupt all TGF-b signaling, skin tumorigenesis is promoted, suggesting that loss of Tgfbr2 is not an initiating event in skin tumorigenesis. Furthermore, cancer progression occurs rapidly when oncogenes are activated (often oncogenic Ha-Ras) in Tgfbr2 null epithelial tissues (Guasch et al., 2007; Lu et al., 2006), and invasive squamous cell carcinoma of the forestomach appears when the Tgfbr2 gene is conditionally inactivated in mouse fibroblasts (Bhowmick et al., 2004). Thus, activation of various growth factors is one of the possible mechanisms for stimulation of epithelial proliferation in selected tissues after disruption of TGF-b signaling. Consistent with those studies, the current results revealed the rapid increase of

Developmental Dynamics

452 LI AND ZHOU

Fig. 7. Inactivation of Jagged2 after 3 days of Dox induction. A: In the control mouse, we detected Jagged2 in lingual epithelia and filiform papillae. B: After 3 days of Dox induction, Jagged2 was sparsely detected in lingual epithelia and filiform papillae. Note that Jagged2 was detected in muscle tissue (B, arrow). C: In the control mouse, cleaved Notch1 (Val1744) was detected in connective tissue of fungiform papillae (arrow). D: After 3 days of Dox induction, cleaved Notch1 still could not be detected in lingual epithelia but was also observed in muscle tissue (arrow). E: In the control mouse, p42/44 MAPK (erk1/2) was observed in connective tissues and lingual epithelia. After 3 days of Dox induction, p42/44 MAPK was still detected in papillae and lingual epithelia, with the stronger signal in lingual epithelia covering the surface of papillae compared with control mice. CT, connective tissue; FuP, fungiform papillae; FP, filiform papillae. Scale bar (A, B, D, E) ¼ 50 mm; (C, F) ¼ 20 mm.

AcH3þ and AcH4þ cells after 5 hr of TGF-b signaling disruption in lingual epithelia. In addition, the AcH3þ cells and AcH4þ cells also showed a different distribution along the whole tongue. It is well known that total cellular histone acetylation is involved in the regulation of gene expression (Ellis et al., 2009; Kouzarides, 2007; Magklara et al., 2011). Several studies have associated the effect of histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitors on gene transcription with an increased accumulation of acetylated histones H3 and H4 in total cellular chromatin (Heitman et al., 1983; Jeter and Cameron, 1971; Jiang et al.,

2008; Schwartz et al., 2011). Histone acetylation up-regulates p21WAF1 expression in human colon cancer cell lines (Chen et al., 2004). Furthermore, acetylation of histone H3 lysine 56 is involved in the core transcriptional network in human embryonic stem cells (Xie et al., 2009), and acetylation of histone H4 on lysine 16 (H4K16Ac) regulates chromatin structure and protein interactions (Kouzarides, 2007). In short, the higher levels of acetylated histones H3 and H4 can disturb the cellular gene expression profile, generating an abnormal microenviroment in lingual epithelia after the disruption of TGF-b signal-

ing. The consequence is ectopic expression of the K14 gene, as GFP expression previously has been observed in the filiform papillae after 3 days of Dox induction (Li and Zhou, 2012). Combined with the results from the above epigenetic study, it is reasonable to think that the complex phenotypic changes revealed in this study may be the result of the interplay between the changes in epigenetic modifications and abnormal gene expression. Cultured primary keratinocytes, obtained from the backskin epidermis of K14-Tgfbr2 null mice, have been shown to display increased b1-intergrin, FAK, Src, and MAPK activities, as well as enhanced migration and invasion (Guasch et al., 2007). In agreement with those results, we also found enhanced pMAPK activity in lingual epithelia after the disruption of TGF-b signaling. Unexpectedly, we also found the loss of Jagged2 expression in lingual epithelia and papillae after 3 days of TGF-b signaling disruption. Although the function of Jagged2 is unknown, activation of Jagged2 by hypoxia in tumor cells induces epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) and also promotes cell survival in vitro (Valsecchi et al., 1997; Xing et al., 2011). Jagged2 also plays an important role in promoting the survival and proliferation of hematopoietic progenitors (Van de Walle et al., 2011). In conclusion, although future studies will be necessary to illuminate the molecular mechanisms underlying the pathological changes of lingual epithelia as we have described, our results provide a mechanistic framework for understanding the role of TGF-b signaling in regulating homeostasis and carcinogenesis in lingual epithelia.

EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES Double Transgenic Mice and Dox Treatment K14-rtTA and TetO-EGFP-Tgfbr2 (PTR) mouse lines obtained from Jackson Laboratories (Bar Harbor, ME) were bred and maintained at the Monell Chemical Senses Center animal facility. All procedures involving animals were approved by the Monell

TGF-b PROMOTES CARCINOMA IN LINGUAL EPITHELIA 453

MD) in serial sections of the tongue. The thickness of lingual epithelia and ratio of the area of positively stained cells to total lingual epithelia were quantitatively calculated with ImagePro Plus (Media Cybernetics Inc., Silver Spring, MD) in serial sections. These data were analyzed by one-way analysis of variance using SPSS11.5 software. Differences were considered to be significant when P < 0.05.

Developmental Dynamics

REFERENCES

Fig. 8. b-catenin expression in lingual epithelia and filiform papillae. A,B: In control mice, bcatenin expression was observed in lingual epithelia, filiform papillae, and fungiform papillae, and many b-cateninþ cells were seen in the interpapillary epithelia. C,D: After 35 days of TGF-b signaling disruption, b-catenin expression was still observed in lingual epithelia and papillae. A nickel solution was added into the substrate solution to produce the desired gray-black stain. Arrows indicate the positive gray-black staining in lingual epithelia (A and B). CT, connective tissue; B, basal cell layer; FuP, fungiform papillae; FP, filiform papillae. Scale bar ¼ 50 mm.

Chemical Senses Center Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee. For Dox administration (Sigma, St. Louis, MO), the drug was diluted in 5% sucrose in water to a final concentration of 0.3–0.5 mg/ml and supplied as drinking water. Animals were allowed unlimited access to the Doxcontaining water, which was changed every 2–3 days. A single intraperitoneal injection of Dox (10 mg/kg body weight) was also administered while the mice began receiving Dox-containing water.

Histology and Immunostaining Procedure For immunocytochemistry, mice were perfused transcardially with 2– 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS; pH 7.2– 7.4). The tongue tissues were dissected, post-fixed in PFA for 2–12 hr, and cryoprotected in 30% sucrose in  PBS at 4 C overnight. After sectioning on a cryostat, 10–12-mm sections were collected onto Superfrost Plus Microscope slides (Fisher Scientific, Pittsburgh, PA). Polyclonal primary antibodies used were specific for GFP (goat, Abcam [Cambridge, MA]

ab-5450; rabbit, ab-6556), anti-acetyl histone H4 (rabbit, Millipore, Billerica, MA; 06–866), b-catenin (rabbit, Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA; 9562), cleaved Notch1 (Val1744 rabbit, Cell Signaling Technology, 2421), Jagged2 (goat, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA; sc8158), and acetyl histone H3 (rabbit, Millipore 06–599). Monoclonal primary antibodies were against p42/44 MAPK (Cell Signaling Technology, 9106). Staining was performed with the TSA Plus system from Perkin Elmer (Waltham, MA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Fluorescent images were captured with the Leica TCS SP2 Spectral Confocal Microscope (Leica Microsystems Inc., Mannheim, Germany). Stainings against GFP and anti-acetyl histone H4 were performed with the standard immunocytochemical procedure according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Vectastain Elite ABC Kits, Vector Labs, Burlingame, CA). Standard hematoxylin and eosin staining was used in the current study. Brightfield images of the sections were digitally captured with ImagePro Plus (Media Cybernetics Inc., Silver Spring,

Amendt C, Schirmacher P, Weber H, Blessing M. 1998. Expression of a dominant negative type II TGF-beta receptor in mouse skin results in an increase in carcinoma incidence and an acceleration of carcinoma development. Oncogene 17:25–34. Amendt C, Mann A, Schirmacher P, Blessing M. 2002. Resistance of keratinocytes to TGFbeta-mediated growth restriction and apoptosis induction accelerates re-epithelialization in skin wounds. J Cell Sci 115:2189–2198. Andl T, Ahn K, Kairo A, Chu EY, WineLee L, Reddy ST, Croft NJ, CebraThomas JA, Metzger D, Chambon P, Lyons KM, Mishina Y, Seykora JT, Crenshaw 3rd EB, Millar SE. 2004. Epithelial Bmpr1a regulates differentiation and proliferation in postnatal hair follicles and is essential for tooth development. Development 131:2257–2268. Androutsellis-Theotokis A, Leker RR, Soldner F, Hoeppner DJ, Ravin R, Poser SW, Rueger MA, Bae S-K, Kittappa R, McKay RDG. 2006. Notch signalling regulates stem cell numbers in vitro and in vivo. Nature 442:823–826. Bhowmick NA, Chytil A, Plieth D, Gorska AE, Dumont N, Shappell S, Washington MK, Neilson EG, Moses HL. 2004. TGF-beta signaling in fibroblasts modulates the oncogenic potential of adjacent epithelia. Science 303:848–851. Bierie B, Moses HL. 2006. TGF-beta and cancer. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev 17:29–40. Blanpain C, Horsley V, Fuchs E. 2007. Epithelial stem cells: turning over new leaves. Cell 128:445–458. Blokzijl A, Dahlqvist C, Reissmann E, Falk A, Moliner A, Lendahl U, Ibanez CF. 2003. Cross-talk between the Notch and TGF-beta signaling pathways mediated by interaction of the Notch intracellular domain with Smad3. J Cell Biol 163:723–728. Cameron IL. 1966. Cell proliferation, migration, and specialization in the epithelium of the mouse tongue. J Exp Zool 163:271–283. Cameron JD, Waterfield RR, Steffes MW, Furcht LT. 1989. Quantification of corneal organ culture migration: central and peripheral epithelium. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 30:2407–2413.

Developmental Dynamics

454 LI AND ZHOU

Cameron RS, Ruffin JW, Cho NK, Cameron PL, Rakic P. 1997. Developmental expression, pattern of distribution, and effect on cell aggregation implicate a neuron-glial junctional domain protein in neuronal migration. J Comp Neurol 387:467–488. Chen YX, Fang JY, Zhu HY, Lu R, Cheng ZH, Qiu DK. 2004. Histone acetylation regulates p21WAF1 expression in human colon cancer cell lines. World J Gastroenterol 10:2643–2646. Cheng N, Bhowmick NA, Chytil A, Gorks AE, Brown KA, Muraoka R, Arteaga CL, Neilson EG, Hayward SW, Moses HL. 2005. Loss of TGF-b type II receptor in fibroblasts promotes mammary carcinoma growth and invasion through upregulation of TGF-&agr-, MSP- and HGF-mediated signaling networks. Oncogene 24:5053–5068. Cui W, Fowlis DJ, Cousins FM, Duffie E, Bryson S, Balmain A, Akhurst RJ. 1995. Concerted action of TGF-beta 1 and its type II receptor in control of epidermal homeostasis in transgenic mice. Genes Dev 9:945–955. Cui W, Fowlis DJ, Bryson S, Duffie E, Ireland H, Balmain A, Akhurst RJ. 1996. TGFbeta1 inhibits the formation of benign skin tumors, but enhances progression to invasive spindle carcinomas in transgenic mice. Cell 86:531–542. De Gobbi M, Garrick D, Lynch M, Vernimmen D, Hughes JR, Goardon N, Luc S, Lower KM, Sloane-Stanley JA, Pina C, Soneji S, Renella R, Enver T, Taylor S, Jacobsen SE, Vyas P, Gibbons RJ, Higgs DR. 2011. Generation of bivalent chromatin domains during cell fate decisions. Epigenet Chrom 4:9. Delay RJ, Kinnamon JC, Roper SD. 1986. Ultrastructure of mouse vallate taste buds: II. Cell types and cell lineage. J Comp Neurol 253:242–252. Ellis L, Atadja PW, Johnstone RW. 2009. Epigenetics in cancer: targeting chromatin modifications. Mol Cancer Ther 8:1409–1420. Falk S, Wurdak H, Ittner L, Ille F, Sumara G, Schmid M, Draganova K, Lang K, Paratore C, Leveen P. 2008. Brain area-specific effect of TGF-b signaling on Wnt-dependent neural stem cell expansion. Cell Stem Cell 2:472– 483. Forrester E, Chytil A, Bierie B, Aakre M, Gorska AE, Sharif-Afshar AR, Muller WJ, Moses HL. 2005. Effect of conditional knockout of the type II TGF-beta receptor gene in mammary epithelia on mammary gland development and polyomavirus middle T antigen induced tumor formation and metastasis. Cancer Res 65:2296–2302. Fre S, Huyghe M, Mourikis P, Robine S, Louvard D, Artavanis-Tsakonas S. 2005. Notch signals control the fate of immature progenitor cells in the intestine. Nature 435:964–968. Frugier T, Koishi K, Matthaei KI, McLennan IS. 2005. Transgenic mice carrying a tetracycline-inducible, trun-

cated transforming growth factor beta receptor (TbetaRII). Genesis 42:1–5. Frye M, Fisher AG, Watt FM. 2007. Epidermal stem cells are defined by global histone modifications that are altered by Myc-induced differentiation. PLoS One 2:e763. Gu B, Watanabe K, Dai X. 2010. Epithelial stem cells: An epigenetic and wntcentric perspective. J Cell Biochem 110:1279–1287. Guasch G, Schober M, Pasolli HA, Conn EB, Polak L, Fuchs E. 2007. Loss of TGFbeta signaling destabilizes homeostasis and promotes squamous cell carcinomas in stratified epithelia. Cancer Cell 12:313–327. Heitman DW, Grubbs BG, Heitman TO, Cameron IL. 1983. Effects of 1,2-dimethylhydrazine treatment and feeding regimen on rat colonic epithelial cell proliferation. Cancer Res 43:1153–1162. Jeter JR Jr, Cameron IL. 1971. Cell proliferation patterns during cytodifferentiation in embryonic chick tissues: liver, heart and erythrocytes. J Embryol Exp Morphol 25:405–422. Jiang Y, Kumada T, Cameron DB, Komuro H. 2008. Cerebellar granule cell migration and the effects of alcohol. Dev Neurosci 30:7–23. Kanwal R, Gupta S. 2010. Epigenetics and cancer. J Appl Physiol 109:598– 605. Kinnamon JC, Taylor BJ, Delay RJ, Roper SD. 1985. Ultrastructure of mouse vallate taste buds. I. Taste cells and their associated synapses. J Comp Neurol 235:48–60. Kouzarides T. 2007. Chromatin modifications and their function. Cell 128:693– 705. Li F, Zhou M. 2012. Local microenvironment provides important cues for cell differentiation in lingual epithelia. PLoS One 7:e35362. Li F, Cao J, Zhou M. 2012. NTPDase2þ cells generate lingual epithelia and papillae. Front Genet 3. Lie D-C, Colamarino SA, Song H-J, D esire L, Mira H, Consiglio A, Lein ES, Jessberger S, Lansford H, Dearie AR, Gage FH. 2005. Wnt signalling regulates adult hippocampal neurogenesis. Nature 437:1370–1375. Liu F, Thirumangalathu S, Gallant NM, Yang SH, Stoick-Cooper CL, Reddy ST, Andl T, Taketo MM, Dlugosz AA, Moon RT, Barlow LA, Millar SE. 2007. Wntbeta-catenin signaling initiates taste papilla development. Nat Genet 39:106–112. Liu Q, Yue XQ, Ling CQ. 2003. Research into the modernization of tongue diagnosis: in retrospect and prospects. Zhong Xi Yi Jie He Xue Bao 1:66–70. Lowry WE, Blanpain C, Nowak JA, Guasch G, Lewis L, Fuchs E. 2005. Defining the impact of beta-catenin/Tcf transactivation on epithelial stem cells. Genes Dev 19:1596–1611. Lu SL, Herrington H, Reh D, Weber S, Bornstein S, Wang D, Li AG, Tang CF, Siddiqui Y, Nord J, Andersen P, Corless

CL, Wang XJ. 2006. Loss of transforming growth factor-beta type II receptor promotes metastatic head-and-neck squamous cell carcinoma. Genes Dev 20:1331–1342. Magklara A, Yen A, Colquitt BM, Clowney EJ, Allen W, Markenscoff-Papadimitriou E, Evans ZA, Kheradpour P, Mountoufaris G, Carey C, Barnea G, Kellis M, Lomvardas S. 2011. An epigenetic signature for monoallelic olfactory receptor expression. Cell 145:555– 570. Nakamura S-i, Kawai T, Kamakura T, Ookura T. 2009. TGF-b3 is expressed in taste buds and inhibits proliferation of primary cultured taste epithelial cells. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim 46:36–44. Nolasco FE, Cameron JS, Hartley B, Coelho RA, Hildredth G, Reuben R. 1987. Abnormal podocyte CR-1 expression in glomerular diseases: association with glomerular cell proliferation and monocyte infiltration. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2:304–312. Okubo T, Pevny LH, Hogan BLM. 2006. Sox2 is required for development of taste bud sensory cells. Genes Dev 20:2654–2659. Okubo T, Clark C, Hogan BL. 2009. Cell lineage mapping of taste bud cells and keratinocytes in the mouse tongue and soft palate. Stem Cells 27:442–450. Robertson MJ, Cameron C, Lazo S, Cochran KJ, Voss SD, Ritz J. 1996. Costimulation of human natural killer cell proliferation: role of accessory cytokines and cell contact-dependent signals. Nat Immun 15:213–226. Schneider FT, Schanzer A, Czupalla CJ, Thom S, Engels K, Schmidt MH, Plate KH, Liebner S. 2010. Sonic hedgehog acts as a negative regulator of {beta}catenin signaling in the adult tongue epithelium. Am J Pathol 177:404–414. Schwartz BE, Hofer MD, Lemieux ME, Bauer DE, Cameron MJ, West NH, Agoston ES, Reynoird N, Khochbin S, Ince TA, Christie A, Janeway KA, Vargas SO, Perez-Atayde AR, Aster JC, Sallan SE, Kung AL, Bradner JE, French CA. 2011. Differentiation of NUT midline carcinoma by epigenomic reprogramming. Cancer Res 71:2686– 2696. Seta Y. 2005. Regulation of taste bud cell differentiation by notch signaling pathway. Chem Senses 30:i48–i49. Shi Y, Massagu e J. 2003. Mechanisms of TGF-b signaling from cell membrane to the nucleus. Cell 113:685–700. Siegel PM, Massagu e J. 2003. Cytostatic and apoptotic actions of TGF-beta in homeostasis and cancer. Nat Rev Cancer 3:807–821. Valsecchi C, Ghezzi C, Ballabio A, Rugarli EI. 1997. JAGGED2: a putative Notch ligand expressed in the apical ectodermal ridge and in sites of epithelial-mesenchymal interactions. Mech Dev 69:203–207. Van de Walle I, De Smet G, Gartner M, De Smedt M, Waegemans E, Vandekerckhove B, Leclercq G, Plum J, Aster

TGF-b PROMOTES CARCINOMA IN LINGUAL EPITHELIA 455

Developmental Dynamics

JC, Bernstein ID, Guidos CJ, Kyewski B, Taghon T. 2011. Jagged2 acts as a Delta-like Notch ligand during early hematopoietic cell fate decisions. Blood 117:4449–4459. Wang XJ, Greenhalgh DA, Bickenbach JR, Jiang A, Bundman DS, Krieg T, Derynck R, Roop DR. 1997. Expression of a dominant-negative type II transforming growth factor beta (TGF-beta) receptor in the epidermis of transgenic mice blocks TGF-beta-mediated growth inhibition. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 94:2386–2391.

Wu J, Zhang Y, Bai J. 2005. Tongue area extraction in tongue diagnosis of traditional chinese medicine. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 5:4955–4957. Xie W, Chow LT, Paterson AJ, Chin E, Kudlow JE. 1999. Conditional expression of the ErbB2 oncogene elicits reversible hyperplasia in stratified epithelia and up-regulation of TGFalpha expression in transgenic mice. Oncogene 18:3593–3607. Xie W, Song C, Young NL, Sperling AS, Xu F, Sridharan R, Conway AE, Garcia BA, Plath K, Clark AT, Grunstein M.

2009. Histone h3 lysine 56 acetylation is linked to the core transcriptional network in human embryonic stem cells. Mol Cell 33:417–427. Xing F, Okuda H, Watabe M, Kobayashi A, Pai SK, Liu W, Pandey PR, Fukuda K, Hirota S, Sugai T, Wakabayshi G, Koeda K, Kashiwaba M, Suzuki K, Chiba T, Endo M, Mo YY, Watabe K. 2011. Hypoxia-induced Jagged2 promotes breast cancer metastasis and self-renewal of cancer stem-like cells. Oncogene 30:4075–4086.