Crosstalk-Free Single Photon Avalanche Photodiodes ... - IEEE Xplore

1 downloads 0 Views 912KB Size Report
Abstract—Advances in single photon avalanche detector. (SPAD) arrays propose ... with the photodiode, active inhibition (MP0/INH) and active reset (MN0/RST) ...
IEEE ELECTRON DEVICE LETTERS, VOL. 35, NO. 1, JANUARY 2014

99

Crosstalk-Free Single Photon Avalanche Photodiodes Located in a Shared Well Anna Vilà, Eva Vilella, Oscar Alonso, and Angel Dieguez, Member, IEEE

Abstract— Advances in single photon avalanche detector (SPAD) arrays propose improving the fill factor by confining several SPADs in the same well, with a main issue related to crosstalk. In applications that measure at fixed times, the pixels can be inhibited before the arrival of the crosstalk charge. This letter reports the crosstalk characterization in an array of SPADs, where the sensors share the same n-well (fill factor 67%), and fabricated in a conventional CMOS technology. The reduction of the gating time 1 ns [11]. Presumably, the slope of the curve in figure 3 is related to the position distribution in which the avalanches are generated. The experiment agrees with the previous theoretical results, demonstrating the possibility to eliminate crosstalk by means of the time-gated operation of the SPAD with tobs shorter than 2.5 ns. Consequently, the dynamic range (ratio between maximum and minimum detectable intensities) can be extended. To be sure that coincidences are only due to crosstalk, it has been verified there are no additional contributions due just to random simultaneity of dark counts. To do that, a photodiode with a high sensitivity (large Dark Count Rate, DCR) in a relatively quiet environment offers the ideal situation [10]. So, pixel 1 (with a DCR of 42.48 kHz, between pixel 0,

[1] M. Ramilli, A. Allevi, L. Nardo, et al., “Silicon photomultipliers: Characterization and applications,” in Photodetectors. Rijeka, Croatia: InTech, 2012, pp. 77–100. [2] A. Vilà, A. Arbat, E. Vilella, et al., “Geiger-mode avalanche photodiodes in standard CMOS technologies,” in Photodetectors. Rijeka, Croatia: InTech, 2012, pp. 175–204. [3] C. Niclass, M. Soga, H. Matsubara, et al., “A 100-m range 10-frame/s 340×96-pixel time-to-flight depth sensor in 0.18-μm CMOS,” IEEE J. Solid-State Circuits, vol. 48, no. 2, pp. 559–568, Feb. 2013. [4] E. Vilella, O. Alonso, and A. Dieguez, “3D integration of Geiger-mode avalanche photodiodes aimed to very high fill-factor pixels for future linear colliders,” Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. A, Accel., Spectrometers, Detectors Assoc. Equip., 2013, to be published. [5] C. Niclass, A. Rochas, P. A. Besse, et al., “A 4s integration time imager based on CMOS single photon avalanche diode technology,” Sens. Actuators A, Phys., vols. 130–131, pp. 273–281, Mar. 2006. [6] D. Stoppa, D. Mosconi, L. Panchieri, et al., “Single-photon avalanche diode CMOS sensor for time-resolved fluorescence measurements,” IEEE Sensors J., vol. 9, no. 9, pp. 1084–1090, Sep. 2009. [7] M. W. Fishburn and E. Charbon, “System tradeoffs in gamma-ray detection utilizing SPAD arrays and scintillators,” IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci., vol. 57, no. 5, pp. 2549–2557, Oct. 2010. [8] E. Vilella, A. Arbat, A. Comerma, et al., “Readout electronics for low dark count pixel detectors based on Geiger mode avalanche photodiodes fabricated in conventional CMOS technologies for future linear colliders,” Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. A, Accel. Spectrometers Detectors Assoc. Equip., vol. 650, pp. 120–124, Sep. 2011. [9] I. Rech, A. Ingargiola, R. Spinelli, et al., “Optical crosstalk in single photon avalanche diode arrays: A now complete model,” Opt. Express, vol. 16, no. 12, pp. 8381–8394, Jun. 2008. [10] T. Frach, G. Prescher, C. Degenhardt, et al., “The digital silicon photomultiplier—Principle of operation and intrinsic detector performance,” in Proc. IEEE Nucl. Sci. Symp. Conf. Rec., Orlando, FL, USA, 2009, pp. 1959–1965. [11] E. Vilella and A. Dieguez, “Readout schemes for low-noise single photon diodes fabricated in standard HV-CMOS technologies,” Microel. J., vol. 44, no. 10, pp. 941–947, Oct. 2013, DOI: 10.1016/j.mejo.2013.01.008.