Internaational Journal of Indusstrial Engineering & Prroduction Research (201 16) December 2016, Volum me 27, Numberr 4 pp. 309-3320
DOI: 110.22068/ijieepr.27.4.309
htttp://IJIEPR..iust.ac.ir/
Cuckooo Optimiization Algorith A m for a Reliable R e Locatioon-Allocation of Hubs aamong th he Clientts Mohamm mad Mehd di Nasiri*, Nafiseh Shamsi S Gamchi & Seeyed Ali Torabi T Mohammadd Mahdi Nasirri, School of Industrial I Eng gineering, Colllege of Engin neering, Univeersity of Tehraan Nafiseh Shaamsi Gamchi,, School of Inddustrial Enginneering, Colleege of Engineeering, Universsity of Tehrann Seyed Ali Torabi, To School of Industrial Engineering, College of Enngineering, University U of Tehran Te
RDS KEYWOR Hub locationn, Allocation, Reliable Patth, Fully Intercoonnection, COA.
ABSTRACT A T H Hubs are criitical elemennts of transpo ortation netw works. Locattion of hubs a and allocatiion of demaands to them m are of high h importaance in the n network dessign. The most m importa ant purpose of these models m is to m minimize thee cost, but path p reliabiliity is also annother important factor w which can in nfluence the location of hubs. h In this paper, we propose a Pc center hub location l moddel with full interconnection among hubs, while t there are diff fferent pathss between origins and deestinations. The T purpose o the model is to determ of mine the reliaable path witth lower costt. Unlike the p prior studiess, the number of hubs in the path is not n limited to t two hubs. T This paper presents a bi-objectivee model whhich includees cost and r reliability too determine the t best loca ations for huubs, the finesst allocation o the demannds to hubs, and of a the mostt efficient paath. In order to illustrate t proposedd model, a nuumerical exaample is pressented and solved the s using t Cuckoo Optimization the O n Algorithm. © 2016 IUST T Publication,, IJIEPR. Voll. 27, No. 4, All A Rights Resserved
1.
In ntroduction n1
Public traansportation is a veryy challenging problem inn many deeveloped annd developing countries. In I addition, hubs are criitical elemennts of telecoommunicatioon and transportation networks because b they y play an impportant role in controlling the traffic. Hubs are sppecial facilitiies in many-too-many distrribution systems, and thhey are used to connect the origins and destinations in i of coonnecting eaach a network. Therefore, instead a pair of origin-destinaations directtly, hubs are located bettween them to consolidaate, route, and distribute thhe traffic in order to take advantage of economies of scale on o inter-hubb connection ns. ms arise in most of the t Hub locatiion problem network ddesign problems. The hub location *
Correspondin ng author: Moha ammad Mehdi Nasiri N
Email:
[email protected] Received 4 Maay 2015; revised d 4 March 2017;; accepted 10 Appril 2017
prroblem is co oncerned with h locating huub facilities annd allocatingg demand no odes to hubs in order to rooute the trafffic between origin-destinnation pairs. Thhis area is riich and incluudes many models m most off which are aimed a to minnimize the coosts and just diiffer in theirr constraintss. Capacity constraints, seervice level constraints, c me, single or delivery tim m multiple alloccation, etc. are a the mainn constraints inn the modeels. Howeveer, the impportance of coonsidering th he reliability of the netwoorks is often neeglected andd few paperss discuss it. In hub and sppoke networkks, any malffunction at thhe path may caause degradaation of the whole w netwoork’s ability too transfer floows; moreovver, due to thhe fact that thhe current networks are quite vulnerable, deesigning moore reliable networks in hub-andsppoke systemss is a critical issue. C Campbell [1] classified hub locationn problems acccording too the optiimization criteria: c (i) m minimization of the totall transportattion cost in thhe p-hub med dian problem m (which is the original
International Journal of Ind dustrial Engineeering & Producttion Research, December D 2016, Vol. V 27, No. 4
310
M. M. N Nasiri, N. Sha amsi Gamchi & S. A. Toraabi
model propposed in [2]); (ii) minim mization of the t total transpportation coost and the fixed cost of establishingg hubs (un-ccapacitated/capacitated huub location pproblem); (iiii) minimizzation of the t maximum transportatiion cost (p-hub ( centter problem); (iv) minimiization of thhe number of hubs whiile serving each paair within a predeterminned bound (h hub coveringg problem). Alumuur, Nickel [3 3] introducedd a multimod dal hub locatioon and netw work design with differeent possible ttransportation n modes. They jointtly considered transportatiion costs annd travel tim mes parately in different huub which are studied sep location prooblems. Theey also considdered differeent service levvels for diffferent types of customers. Contreras, Fernández [4] presentedd a model for f m, where the t hubs are a hub locatiion problem connected by means of a treee. The mod del ork combines several aspeects of locaation, netwo design, andd routing problems. Oktal and Ozger [5] developed the tradition nal model of uun-capacitateed multiple allocation huub location pproblem. Thhe new coonstraints are a consideringg the value and compoonents of coost including ddirect operaating cost, total t operating cost, fixedd and variiable costs for aircraffts. Alumur annd Kara [6] reviewed r thee network huub location pproblems. Since S hubs are special facilities thhat serve ass switching, transshipmeent and sortingg points in many-to-man m ny distribution systems, thhey classifieed and survveyed netwo ork hub locatioon models. They categoorized the huub location models m as follows: p-hub p mediian problem, huub location problem p withh fixed cost, phub center problem, and hub coveriing problem. Kim and O'Kelly [7] discussed reliable p-huub in teleccommunication location problems nted a new w hub location networks. They presen which focuses on maxim mizing netwo ork problem w performancce in terms of reliabilitty by locating hubs for deelivering flow ws among citty nodes. Zhou and Liu [88] formulateed a capacittated locatioonallocation problem with w stochaastic demannds expected value moodel, channce-constrainned annd deppendent-channce programmiing, programmiing accordinng to diffe ferent criterria. Their objecctive is to minimize m the transportation cost. Melkkote and Dasskin [9] com mbined faciliity location/neetwork desiggn problem. In this moddel, the capacitty of facilitiees is limited to the amouunt of demand they can seerve. Klose and a Drexl [1 10] on networkk which is a designed a distributio strategic isssue. In thiis model, thhey developped continuous location moodels and network location models. Daskin, Snydder [11] presented faciliity
Cuckooo Optimization n Algorithm for f a Reliablee …
loocation decissions in a suppply chain ddesign. They reeviewed cllassical mo odels incluuding the traditional fix xed charge faacility locatiion problem d to annd the conteext of facilitty location decisions inncorporate addditional feattures of a suppply chain. Bashiri, Mirzzaei [12] discussed the qualitative paarameters whhich have crritical roles to locate the huubs in thee best placces. They considered paarameters, such s as quaality of serrvice, zone traffic, enviroonmental isssues, and caapability for deevelopment, in the futuree, in additionn to cost and tim me. Alumu ur, Yamann [13] prroposed a hiierarchical multimodal m h location problem in hub w which two typpes of hubs and hub linkks are to be esstablished. In this modeel, they connsidered the tim mer-definite deliveriess. de Cam margo, de M Miranda [14]] worked on o the MM MHLRP and coombined tw wo models: the vehiccle routing prroblem and the single-hhub location problem to deevelop a new formulatiion for the problem of frreight industtry in a paarcel deliverry network deesign. In thhis problem, several faacilities are reesponsible foor assemblinng flows froom origins, ree-routing, dissassembling, and deliverring them to thhe final desttinations. Geelareh and Nickel N [15] prresented a MIP M hub loccation modell for public transport. In their moddel, several levels of ( locating deecisions are made simulltaneously: (1) huub nodes; (2) ( choosing the connnecting hub eddges to havee a connecteed hub-levell graph; (3) roouting the floows through the cheapestt paths. R Razmi, Zahed di-Anaraki [16] [ proposeed a model foor reliable warehouse network deesign. They prresented a bi-objective stochastic s miixed-integer linnear program ming modell to minimiize average coosts of prod duction, trannsportation, relocation, annd capacity extension and to maaximize the cooverage perccent of custo omer demannd delivered w within preferrred delivery y lead time. Eghbali, A Abedzadeh [ [17] propossed a mullti-objective m model which consists of cost minim mization and m minimization i of the total number of intermediate linnks (betweeen all origgins and deestinations). A Although theey considereed a constrraint which asssured that the t reliabilityy of a routee is not less thhan a specifieed value. A mathematicaal model for thhe dynamic single alllocation hubb covering prroblem was proposed by b Zare Meehrjerdi and H Hosseininasab b [18], which w consiidered the coovering radiius of hub nodes as one o of the deecision variaables in order to save tthe costs of esstablishing additional hub nodees. Davari, Zarandi [19] presented an a HLP whiich aims to m maximize thee reliability of the rooutes. They
International Journal of Ind dustrial Engineeering & Producttion Research, December D 2016, Vol. V 27, No. 4
Cuckoo Optiimization Algoorithm for a Reliable R ……
considered the reliabiility of eacch arc in the t network off hub-and-spooke as fuzzy variables. m to design a reliab ble Kim [20] ddiscussed a model and survivaable hub netw work. Kim [19] considerred the substanntial aspectss of the cuurrent netwoork systems suuch as locaations demannding servicce, their interaactions, the role r of hubs,, and inter-huub links. Karim mi, Eydi [21] presented a model for the t capacitatedd single allocation a hub location problem with a approcch. hierarchiccal Tavak kkoli-Moghaaddam [2 22] Mohammaddi, presented a mixed-intteger prograamming mod del mproved metta-heuristic algorithms to and two im solve a cappacitated sing gle allocationn hub covering location pproblem. Ghodratnama G a, TavakkooliMoghaddam m [23] comppared three proposed p mettaheuristics to solve a new p-hhub locatio onallocation problem. Yahyaei, Bashhiri [24] ussed m undder multi-criterria decisionn making methods criteria weights uncertaainty to solvve logistic huub Moghaddam, Gholipouurlocation. Tavakkoli-M osed a multi-objecti m ive Kanani [[25] propo imperialist competitivee algorithm for f solving the t capacitatedd single-alllocation hhub location problem. Z Zarei, Mahhdavi [26] presented the t multi-level capacity approach too specify the t t appropriatee link typess to be insstalled on the network eddges leadingg to deteminnination of the t correct opptimum hu ub locationn and spooke allocation. Tavakkoli-M Moghaddam m, Baboli [227] proposed a new robust mathematiccal model forr a p-hub coveering probleem, which coped with the t intrinsic unncertainty of some param meters. Cuckoo seaarch (CS) is an optimizaation algorithhm developed by Yang and Deb [228]. A mulltiw objective ccuckoo searrch (MOCS)) method was formulatedd to deaal with multi-criterria ms. This appproach usses optimizatioon problem random weeights to combine multiiple objectiv ves to become a single objeective. As the weights vaary nts can be found, so the t randomly, Pareto fron t points cann be distribbuted diverssely over the fronts. The signifiicant shortcooming of the papers in thhis scope is thhat the researrchers considder one or tw wo hubs betweeen the origiins and destiinations, while there may bbe more thann two hubs inn the path. The T situation arrises when thhe cost of ussing three huubs in a path iss less than using two hubbs, such as the t non-Eucliddean TSP. Therefore, T in this paper, we w propose a P P-center hub b location model m with full fu interconnecction amon ng hubs, annd there are a different paaths between n origins and destination ns. In this model, m we consider c thee cost to be minimized and the relliability to be b maximizeed.
M. M. Nasiiri, N. Sham msi Gamchi, S. A. Torabi
311
ws between Thhe model finnds the best path for flow orrigins and deestinations. Thhe remainder of the paper p is orrganized as foollows. We would have the nottations and asssumptions of o the model in Section 2. 2 The main boody and form mulation of the problem is i presented inn Section 3. 3 Section 4 discussees a short deescription of o COA. Numerical N e example is diiscussed in Section 5 to t illustrate the model. Fiinally, Secttion 6 conccludes the paper and prresents the potential areaa for further studies. s
2. Nottations and d Assumptiions Thhis section n introducess the notaations and foormulations of our model. m Here,, we state deecision varriables, inpput parameeters, and asssumptions underlying u ou ur models. 2--1. Input parameterrs and deecision
vaariables Inn this paper, we introducce two diffeerent sets of pootential hubss. One of them m is a subsett of demand noodes potentiaal for constiituting a hubb. The other onne is a subseet of non-dem mand nodes. Therefore, w define the following seets: we : Set of Cllients; This set includess all of the cuustomers in the t problem. : Set of pottential hub locations within demand noodes ( ⊆ ) : Set of potential p hubb locations within w nondeemand nodess ( ∩ ∅) Inn this moddel, we connsider diffeerent costs, inncluding fixeed cost of esstablishing huubs, cost of alllocating the customers to t the hubs, and cost of transportationn. The notattions of diffferent costs arre as follows: : Fixed costt of installing g hub at nodee ∈ : Fixed costt of installing g hub at nodee ∈ : The cost of o allocating node i to huub j. : Unit cosst of transpo ortation amonng clients k annd l via path a Each demand d node has a flow to annother node nt of this flow w is an inputt parameter. annd the amoun : Demand flow betweeen nodes k annd l Thhe capacity of each hub b is distinctiive and the am mount of demand d cannnot be moree than this caapacity. : Capacityy of hub i Siince a P-ccenter hub location problem p is suupposed, it is necessary to locate P hubs in the neetwork and allocate a the customers c to these hubs. : Number off hubs Inn this modell, there are different d patths between orrigins and destinations, d and also eacch path has diifferent reliab bility as folloows:
International Journal of Ind dustrial Engineeering & Producttion Research, December D 2016, Vol. V 27, No. 4
312
M. M. N Nasiri, N. Sha amsi Gamchi & S. A. Toraabi
: Reliaability of path h a among cllient k and l We consideer that it is possible p to have h more thhan one hub in a path betweeen two dem mand nodes. : Set off hubs in pathh a between clients k andd l In additionn, the decisioon variables are defined as follows. 1 0 1 0 1 0
2-2. Assum mptions The propossed model inn this paper is i based on the t following aassumptions:: 1. Thhere are P hubbs to be locaated. 2. Eacch client is just allocateed to one huub (single alloocation). 3. Thhe hubs are fu ully interconnnected. 4. Thhere are diffferent paths between tw wo clients bassed on the number off hubs in the t determinedd path. The total t numberr of paths is as follows: | N | | N p' TNP p P
| P i ! i 1
( (1)
we would hav ve: 1, 2, 2 …, . and then, w 5. Thhe number off hubs in eacch path is leess than the tottal number of hubs. | ∈ ((2) , , | where | .
3. The Pro oposed Mod del There are many paperrs, including hub locatio onhe main shhortcoming of allocation models. Th t determ mine a speciffic these models is that they e path, and they juust number off hubs in each consider thhe cost, but as in realityy, maximizing the reliabiility of the path is as important as t minimizingg the cost off establishingg hubs and the cost of trannsportation between two clients. c Here, we have a bi--objective fuunction whiich consists off minimizingg the cost annd maximizing the reliabiliity. Min OB1
C y C y C z C i
iN p
i
i
iN 'p
i
ij ij
i
j
Max OB 2 Rkla xkla k
l
a
yi P
zij 1, j N
kla
k
l
a
iN p N 'p
zij yi 0, i N p N p' , j N
xkla k yi 0, i Fkla
xkla k
(8)
ziki 0, i Fklaa
(9)
k N N p N 'p
wkl xkla capi , i Fkla xkla k , yi , zij {0,1}
(10) (11)
Thhe first objecctive functioon minimizess the cost of innstalling hubs in demand nodes and non-demand n noodes, the cosst of allocatinng a node too a hub, and thhe cost of flo ow between origin and destination. Thhe second one o maximizes the reliabbility of the paath, which is i selected to transport the flows. C Constraint (1)) shows the number of hubs in the m model. We haave a single allocation a in this model, i.ee., each dem mand node should be allocated a to onnly one huub. This concept c is shown by coonstraint (2).. Constraintss (3) allow a node to be alllocated to a hub only if i that hub is installed. C Constraints (4 4) guarantee that the pathh between k annd l includees hub i if that t hub is established. C Constraints (5 5) show that the path bettween k and l can exist if k and l are assigned to the t existing huubs in that path. p Since each hub haas a limited caapacity, the amount a of floow cannot be more than itss capacity. This T constrainnt is shown in (6).
4. Cucko oo Optimizzation Algoorithm Thhe model is solved by the t cuckoo optimization o allgorithm (CO OA) which iss suitable forr continuous noonlinear optiimization prooblems. COA A has some addvantages in n comparisonn to other metaheuristic m m methods such as rapidd convergennce, higher acccuracy, and ability of loocal search inn addition to gllobal search.. Applying MOCS, M we use u random w weights to coombine two objectives to a single obbjective. In this algorithhm, cuckooss with their egggs are initiaalized and loccated in diffe ferent places ass the initiaal solution. Some of the initial soolutions (egggs) are detected d as infeasible soolutions, annd thus rem moved. Theen, a new geeneration of cuckoos is produced p annd the profit vaalues and in nfeasible solutions are ddetected. At laast, the beest places for the cuuckoos are deetermined as a the opptimum soluution. The flowchart of thhis algorithm m is as in Figg. 1 [29].
4--1. Solution n representtation
w
(3)) (4)) (5))
iN p N 'p
Cuckooo Optimization n Algorithm for f a Reliablee …
Thhe random key representation iss used for enncryption annd the smalleest position value v (SPV) ruule is appliied to decrrypt and caalculate the obbjective funcctions.
(6)) (7))
International Journal of Ind dustrial Engineeering & Producttion Research, December D 2016, Vol. V 27, No. 4
Cuckoo Optiimization Algoorithm for a Reliable R ……
M. M. Nasiiri, N. Sham msi Gamchi, S. A. Torabi
3133
Main Effects Plo ot for Means Data Me eans No. of cuckk os
MaxNo of Eggs
MaxIter
2.5000E+14 2.4800E+14
Mean of Means
2.4600E+14 2.4400E+14 2.4200E+14 1
2
1
No of Clusters
2 3 Mottion Coefficient
4
1
4
1
2 3 Ma axNo of cuck oos
4
2.5000E+14 2.4800E+14 2.4600E+14 2.4400E+14 2.4200E+14 1
2
3
4
1
2
3
2
3
4
Fig. 2. Result R of thee Taguchi method m
5.. Numericaal Example
Fig. 1. Flow wchart of CO OA [29] meter tuningg 4-2. Param We designn different experiments e t based on the important factors f of CO OA such as the number of cuckoos, tthe maximu um number of eggs, the t maximum number of iterations, the t number of n coefficiennt, and the t clusters, the motion o to set the t maximum nnumber of cuckoos. In order parameters, the Taguch hi method is used for the t design of experimentss. The levells of differeent T 1, and the results are a factors are shown in Table Fig. 2. shown in F Tab. 1. Levels L for diifferent facttors of COA A M Ma x No. Maax No. of Motion Max No. No. of of Cucko Cooeffici Iterati o of Cuckko Clust ent os on E Eg oss ers ggs 4 1 5 0 100 10 10 6 12 2 2 6 120 20 8 14 4 3 7 140 10 16 6 4 8 160 We have also variedd populationn size n and probabilityy . We have used n = 15, 20, 50, 1000, 150 and = 0, 0.1, 0.115, 0.2, 0.25,, 0.3, 0.35. The T simulationss show that n = 20 and = 0.25 are a sufficient fo for this optim mization probblem.
Suuppose that a country with w 24 citiess and all of thhem are potential locationns for hubs among a nondeemand and demand d nodees. Also, supppose that a 5--center hub location-alloocation probblem. There w would be at most m 5 hubss in each paath between tw wo clients, and a the purppose is to deetermine the loocation of hu ubs and alloccate the clieents to them (ssee Appendixx A). Then, the t path betw ween origins annd destinattions wouldd be deteermined to m maximize thee reliability and minimizze the cost. Thhe model is solved by the t cuckoo optimization o allgorithm (CO OA), and the results are as a follows: Tab. 2. Hubs H selecteed by the prooposed algorithm B locationns for hubs Best Tehraan, Mashhad,, Isfahan, Keerman, Tabrriz
T Tab. 3. Alloccation of citiies to the selected hubs Huub Tehran Mashhad Isfahan
Kerman Tabriz
Allocated City C Mazandaaran, Gilan, Ghazvin, Zanjan, Z Hamedan, Karaj Golestann, Semnan, Khorasan__N Ghom, M MarKazi, ChaharMahhalVaBakht iari, Yazd Hormozggan, SistanVaBaluchestan, Khorasan__S Urmia, Kordestan, K Ardabil
o hubs and By solving thhe model, thee locations of d cities are determined d a in Tables as thheir allocated
International Journal of Ind dustrial Engineeering & Producttion Research, December D 2016, Vol. V 27, No. 4
314
M. M. N Nasiri, N. Sha amsi Gamchi & S. A. Toraabi
2 and 3. They show that the cost c would be ble minimized by using these hubs. The reliab d as well. For example, paths are determined consider thhat someone in Yazd wannts to travel to Urmia. Usiing this moddel leads to the following path: “Yazd- Isfaahan- Tehran n- Tabriz- Urmia” Ur with the t reliability oof 0.9234 which w is moree reliable thhan the path “Y Yazd- Isfahan n- Tabriz- Urmia” Ur with the t reliability oof 0.7302. The paths between thhe hubs are different, and since we hhave 20 citiess and five huubs, we wouuld have lots oof paths whiich are deterrmined by the t model.
Cuckooo Optimization n Algorithm for f a Reliablee …
b strategy a bi-objective model to find out the best t demand foor establishinng the hubs,, allocating the noodes to the hubs, h and deetermining thhe best path beetween two clients c in ordder to minim mize the cost annd maximizee the reliabiliity. The moddel is solved byy Cuckoo Opptimization Algorithm A foor a country w with 31 citiees and diffeerent reliablee paths are deetermined beetween origiin and destinnation. The sttochastic dem mand for thee customers or different loocation-allocaation probleem with reeliable path appproach can be consideered for futuure research sttudies. Furth hermore, onee can study a hub-tree neetwork insteaad of fully innterconnectedd hubs.
Refereences [11]
Camppbell, J.F., Integer prrogramming formuulations of discrete huub location probleems. Eurropean Joournal of Operaational Reseearch. Vol. 72, No. 2, (1994 4), pp. 387-40 05.
[22]
O'kellly, M.E., A quadrattic integer progrram for the location off interacting hub facilities. European JJournal of Operaational Reseearch. Vol. 32, No. 3, (1987 7), pp. 393-40 04.
[33]
Alum mur, S.A., Nickel, N S.,Saldanha-daGamaa, F., Hub H locatioon under uncerrtainty. Transsportation Reesearch Part B: Methodologic M cal. Vol. 46, 4 No. 4, (2012 2), pp. 529-54 43.
[44]
Contrreras, I., Fernández, E.,Marín, A., The tree of hu ubs locationn problem. Europpean Journnal of Operational Reseaarch. Vol. 202, No. 2, (2010), pp. 390-4 400.
[55]
Oktal, H. , Ozger,, A., Hub loccation in air cargo o transportaation: A case c study. Journal of Air Transport T M Management. 2 No. (20133), pp. 1-4. Vol. 27,
[66]
Alum mur, S. , Kara, B.Y., N Network hub locatiion problemss: The state of the art. Europpean Journnal of Operational Reseaarch. Vol. 1990, No. 1, (20008), pp. 121.
[77]
Kim, H. , O'Kellyy, M.E., Reliiable p‐Hub Locattion Problems in Telecoommunicatioon Networks. Geogrraphical Anaalysis. Vol. 41, No. 3, (2009 9), pp. 283-30 06.
Fig.. 3. Iran map p by determ mined hubs
Figg. 4. Converggence of the proposed algorith hm (
6. Conclusion Public traansportation is a veryy challenging problem inn many deeveloped annd developing countries. In I addition, hubs are criitical elemennts of telecoommunicatioon and transportation networks, bbecause they y play an im mportant role in controlling the traffic. In I this paperr, we propossed
International Journal of Ind dustrial Engineeering & Producttion Research, December D 2016, Vol. V 27, No. 4
Cuckoo Optiimization Algoorithm for a Reliable R ……
[8]
[9]
[10]
Zhhou, J. , Liu, B., New stocchastic modeels forr capacitaated locattion-allocation prooblem. Co omputers & industrial enggineering. Vol. V 45, No. 1, (2003), pp. p 111-125. D M.S S., Capacitatted Meelkote, S. , Daskin, faccility loccation/netwoork desiggn prooblems. E European journal of opeerational ressearch. Vol.. 129, No. 3, (20001), pp. 481 1-495. Kloose, A. , Drrexl, A., Faacility location moodels for diistribution system s desiggn. Euuropean Joournal of Operation nal Research. Vol. 162, No. 1, (2005), pp. 429..
[11]
V.,Berger, R.T T., Daaskin, M.S., Snyder, L.V Facility locatio on in supplyy chain desiggn, in Logistics systems: Design and opttimization. (2 2005), Springer. p. 39-655.
[12]
M M.,Randall, M., M Baashiri, M., Mirzaei, Moodeling fuzzyy capacitatedd p-hub centter prooblem and d a genettic algorith hm sollution. Applied A Mathematiccal Moodelling. Vool. 37, No. 5, (2013), pp. p 3513-3525.
[13]
[14]
H B.Y Y., Aluumur, S.A.,, Yaman, H.,Kara, Hieerarchical multimodal m hub location prooblem with time-definiite deliveriees. Traansportation Research Paart E: Logistiics andd Transportaation Review w. Vol. 48, No. N 6, ((2012), pp. 1107-1120. 1 d Mirandda, de Camargo, R.S., de n, A., A new formulation G.,,Løkketangen andd an exact approach a forr the many-ttomaany hub loocation-routting problem. Appplied Mathematical Modelling. Vo ol. 37,, No. 12, (20 013), pp. 7465-7480.
[15]
Geelareh, S. , Nickel, S., Hub location prooblems in transportatiion networkks. Traansportation Research Paart E: Logistiics andd Transportaation Review w. Vol. 47, No. N 6, ((2011), pp. 1092-1111. 1
[16]
Raazmi, J., Zahhedi-Anaraki, A.,Zakerinnia, M., A bi-objecttive stochastiic optimization moodel for reliable warehhouse netwoork reddesign. Matthematical and a Computter
M. M. Nasiiri, N. Sham msi Gamchi, S. A. Torabi
[117]
3155
Modeelling. Vol. 58, 5 No. 11, (2013), pp. 1804--1813. Eghbaali, M., Abeedzadeh, M..,Setak, M., Multi--objective reliable r hubb covering locatiion connsidering customer conveenience usingg NSGA-II. Innternational Journal of System Assurance Enginneering and Managemennt. Vol. 5, No. 3, (2014), pp. 450-460.
[118]
Zare Mehrjerdi, Y. Y , Hosseinninasab, H., Dynam mic Hub Covering C Prooblem with Flexibble Coveringg Radius. Innternational Journal of Industrrial Engineerring & Produuction Reseaarch. Vol. 226, No. 3, (2015 5), pp. 175-19 92.
[119]
Davarri, S., Zaranddi, M.F.,Turkksen, I. The fuzzy reliable hub location problem. p in Fuzzyy Informatioon Processiing Society (NAFI FIPS), 2010 Annual A Meeeting of the North h American. (2010). ( IEEE E.
[220]
Kim, H., Reliable p-hubb location probleems and prootection moddels for hub netwoork design. (2008), ( The Ohio State Univeersity.
[221]
Karim mi, M., Eydi, E A.,K Korani, E., Modeeling of the Capacitaated Single Alloca ation Hub Location Probblem with a Hiera archical Appproch. Innternational Journal of Engineering (1025--2495). Vol. 27, No. 4, (2014).
[222]
Mohaammadi, M., et al., Genetic G and improoved shuff ffled frogg leaping algoriithms for a 2-stage 2 moddel of a hub covering location n network. Innternational Journal of Induustrial Engiineering & Produuction Reseaarch. Vol. 222, No. 3, (2011), pp. 179-18 87.
[223]
A., TavakkoliGhodrratnama, Moghhaddam, R.,B Baboli, A., Comparing three proposed p meeta-heuristiccs to solve a new p-hub p locatiion-allocatioon problem. Internnational Jouurnal of E EngineeringTransactions C: Aspects. A Vol. 26, No. 9, 3), pp. 1043. (2013
[224]
Yahyaaei, M., Baashiri, M.,Gaarmeyi, Y., multi--criteria loggistic hub location l by netwoork segmentation undeer criteria weighhts uncertainty (reseaarch note). Internnational Jouurnal of E Engineering-
International Journal of Ind dustrial Engineeering & Producttion Research, December D 2016, Vol. V 27, No. 4
316
M. M. N Nasiri, N. Sha amsi Gamchi & S. A. Toraabi
[25]
Cuckooo Optimization n Algorithm for f a Reliablee …
Traansactions B: B Applicatiions. Vol. 27, 2 Noo. 8, (2013), pp. p 1205. Tavvakkoli-Mogghaddam, R., R GholipouurKaanani, Y.,Shhahramifar, M., A mulltiobjjective i imperialist competitiive alggorithm forr a capaciitated singllealloocation hub locatioon problem. Intternational Journal of EngineerinngTraansactions C: C Aspects. Vol. V 26, No. 6, (20013), pp. 605 5-612.
[26]
Level Capacity Zarrei, V., et all., A Multi-L App pproach to the Hub and Spoke Sp Networrk. Intternational Journal of o Industrial Enngineering & Production Research. R Vo ol. 24,, No. 1, (2013), pp. 1-15..
[27]
oli, Tavvakkoli-Mogghaddam, R., Babo A.,,Vahdani, B., B A Robustt Optimization App pproach for a p-Hub Covvering Probleem witth Producction Faciilities, Tim me Hoorizons and Transporterr. Internation nal Jouurnal of Inddustrial Enggineering. Vo ol. 25,, No. 4, (2014).
[28]
D S. Cuckkoo search via v Yaang, X.-S. , Deb, Lévvy flights. in i Nature & Biologically Insspired Comp puting, 2009.. NaBIC 20009. Woorld Congresss on. (2009)). IEEE.
[29]
ajabioun, R., R Cuckoo optimization Raj alggorithm. Appplied soft coomputing. Vo ol. 11,, No. 8, (2011), pp. 5508-5518.
International Journal of Ind dustrial Engineeering & Producttion Research, December D 2016, Vol. V 27, No. 4
M. M. Nasirii, N. Shamsi Gaamchi, S. A. Torabi
Cuckoo Optimization O Algorrithm for a Reliable ……
31 17
Appendix A A- Daata Gathering
Tab.. A. 1. Cost of transshipment t from hub k to hub l City
Tehran
Mashhad Isfahan Karaj
Tabriz
Tehran
100000
883
446
51
626
939
967
151
502
3333
Mashhad
883
100000
1,252
940
1,514
1,344
1,762
953
1,378
1,2222
909
Isfahan
446
1,252 100000
462
936
480
522
316
641
6645
734
462 100000
579
944
1,004
187
524
2287
1,084
579 100000
1384
1,097
766
778
4492
1,662
1,384 100000
527
798
1,021
1,1127
595
1,561
527 100000
831
638
1,1160
1,170
1,272
443
4472
906
907
100000
5549
1,364
636
1,368
633
1,,915
100000
1,806
537
Karaj
51
940
Tabriz
626
1,514
901
Shiraz
939
1,344
570
944
Ahvaz
967
1,762
522
1,004
1,097
Shiraz
Ghom
151
953
316
187
766
798
Kermanshah
502
1,378
641
524
778
1,021
Rasht Kerman Urmia
Ahvaz
Ghom
831 100000 638
443
333
1,222
645
287
492
1,127
1,160
472
1,047
909
734
1,084
1,662
595
1,170
906
Kermanshah Rashht
549 1000000 1,364
1,3368
Kerman Urmia 1,047
768
Zaheedan Arak
Bandar B e Ghazvin Ardabil Abbas A
Zanjan
Khoram Abad Sanandaj Gorgan Sari
S Shahrekord Bushehr Bojnu urd Birjand Ilam
1,,579
288
321
626
152
592
1,530
334
629
492
414
280
538
1,068
1,657
943
1,087
1,198
917
1,042
1,482
1,634
1,222
1,505
1,369
567
730
1,333
1,079
1,,275
333
530
313
471
904
988
651
768
702
852
718
123
722
1,,631
309
343
662
106
546
1,567
287
651
514
423
319
574
152
2,,210
726
597
1,241
471
277
1,891
295
905
455
1,032
898
989
1,,102
815
1,012
439
953
1,386
580
1,133
909
1,183
1,333
1,200
1,,677
753
797
812
987
1,358
1,245
972
550
866
1,367
1,233
1,,447
135
321
484
291
731
1,389
474
570
492
544
1,,904
313
199
942
418
660
1,620
486
193
229
911
493
384
946
178
247
1,726
200
692
483
1,049
1,180
419
1,190
1,631
496
1,370
1,487
1,351
768
1,657
1,079
722
152
1,561
1,272
907
636
6633
1,579
943
1,275
1,631
2,210
1,102
1,677
1,447
1,904
1,9915
537
2,348
Arak
288
1,087
333
309
726
815
753
135
313
4493
1,049
719
1,,590 100000
Hamedan
321
1,198
530
343
597
1,012
797
321
199
3384
1,180
533
1,,722
188
Yazd
626
917
313
662
1,241
439
812
484
942
9946
419
1,380
960
Ghazvin
152
1,042
471
106
471
953
987
291
418
1178
1,190
610
Ardabil Bandar Abbas
592
1,482
904
546
277
1,386
1,358
731
660
2247
1,631
2,030
1,530
Zahedan
Hamedan Yazd
1,806 100000
Semnaan Yasuj
82 25
1,120
670
21 17
783
1,645
26 62
1,645
1,547
66 68
1,303
615
1,19 90
900
810
58 86
330
1,104
87 79
1,172
692
27 71
819
1,518
1,45 52
1,751
757
84 48
1,233
523
287
1,34 49
1,071
960
1,06 68
252
478
436
1,70 01
1,429
601
1,09 93
425
410
397
926
89 92
1,184
612
28 84
641
777
527
906
1,31 17
1,607
167
70 08
833
500
366
735
1,263
80 06
1,456
734
55 52
979
1,141
1,128
879
850
1,00 08
581
1,525
97 74
815
2,,348
719
533
1,380
610
2,030
2,119
436
769
411
1,171
1,037
1,128
1,657
1,59 96
1,890
713
98 88
1,372
100 0000
1,590
1,722
960
1,735
2,175
710
1,917
2,026
1,893
1,300
1,423
1,375
1,346
1,10 08
453
2,067
1,36 64
1,311
188
628
317
690
1,416
434
437
362
698
564
309
953
1,02 25
1,323
479
41 17
668
100000
764
242
566
1,595
305
312
175
735
601
464
1,132
1,13 36
1,431
353
52 28
847
628
764 10 00000
766
1,206
916
949
1,060
927
752
740
463
730
93 38
638
1,101
58 81
388
1,,735
317
242
766
100000
435
1,550
179
545
409
558
424
560
1,089
98 80
1,277
587
37 72
804
2,,175
690
566
1,206
435
100000
1,982
261
811
538
746
612
954
1,483
1,05 53
1,715
911
81 12
1,198
00000 1,982 10
e 1,634
1,078
1,567
1,981
670
1,245
1,389
1,620
1,7726
496
2,119
710
1,416
1,595
916
1,550
1,730
1,574
1,780
1,555
1,543
1,120
952
1,71 19
1,174
1,162
1,38 88
932
Zanjan Khoram Abad
334
1,222
608
287
296
1,091
972
474
486
2200
1,370
436
1,,917
434
305
949
179
261
1,599 100000
613
285
740
606
697
1,226
1,16 60
1,459
654
55 56
941
629
1,505
768
651
905
909
550
570
193
6692
1,487
769
2,,026
437
312
1,060
545
811
1,574
613
100000
357
905
771
354
818
1,44 44
1,297
292
83 35
660
Sanandaj
492
1,369
702
514
455
1,183
866
492
229
4483
1,351
411
1,,893
362
175
927
409
538
1,780
285
357
100000
898
764
647
1,062
1,30 07
1,593
303
69 99
1,010
Gorgan
414
567
852
423
1,032
1,333
1,367
544
911
5500
1,141
1,171
1,,300
698
735
752
558
746
1,555
740
905
898 100000
132
935
1,464
30 05
850
1,071
30 05
1,180
Sari
280
730
718
319
898
1,200
1,233
410
777
3366
1,128
1,037
1,,423
564
601
740
424
612
1,543
606
771
764
132 100000
804
1,334
43 36
968
940
19 97
1,049
Shahrekord
538
1,333
123
574
989
523
478
397
527
7735
879
1,128
1,,375
309
464
463
560
954
1,120
697
354
647
935
804
100000
554
1,27 71
1,017
697
66 63
269
Bushehr
1,068
1,645
615
1,104
1,518
287
436
926
906
1,2263
850
1,657
1,,346
953
1,132
730
1,089
1,483
952
1,226
818
1,062
1,464
1,334
554
100000
1,80 01
1,478
914
1,19 93
454
Bojnurd
825
262
1,190
879
1,452
1,349
1,701
892
1,317
8806
1,008
1,596
1,,108
1,025
1,136
938
980
1,053
1,513
1,160
1,444
1,307
305
436
1,271
1,801
10000 00
650
1,485
60 06
1,516
Internationall Journal of Industriall Engineering & Production Research, Deceember 2016, Vol. 27, N No. 4
318 Birjand Ilam
M. M. M Nasiri, N. Sham msi Gamchi & S. A. A Torabi
Cuckoo Optimization O Algorrithm for a Reliab ble …
1,120
1,645
900
1,172
1,751
1,071
1,429
1,184
1,607
1,4456
581
1,890
453
1,323
1,431
638
1,277
1,715
1,174
1,459
1,297
1,593
850
968
1,017
1,478
670
1,547
810
692
757
960
601
612
167
7734
1,525
713
2,,067
479
353
1,101
587
911
1,162
654
292
303
1,071
940
697
914
65 50 100000 1,48 85
1,781
90 05
1,146
1,781 100000
87 77
858
10000 00
908
Semnan
217
668
575
271
847
1,058
1,093
284
708
5552
974
988
1,,364
417
528
581
372
812
1,566
560
835
699
305
197
663
1,193
60 06
905
877
Yasuj
783
1,303
330
819
1,233
252
425
641
833
9979
815
1,372
1,,311
668
847
388
804
1,198
932
941
660
1,010
1,180
1,049
269
454
1,51 16
1,146
858
Tab. A. 2. Cost of transp portation betweeen origin and destination Ban Khora nda Mashh Isfaaha Kerma Kerma Ghazv Ardabi r m Sanann Gorga Semna Zahed Hame Shahre Bushe Bojnur Birjan e City Tehran ad n Urmia an in l bas Zanjan Abad daj Ilam I n Yasuj Karaj Tabriz Shirazz Ahvaz Ghom nshah Rasht n Arak dan Yaazd Abb n Sari kord hr d d 10000 Tehran 460 510 6260 939 90 9670 1510 5020 3330 10,470 7680 15,790 288 3,210 6260 1,520 5920 15,3 300 3340 6,290 4920 4,140 2800 5,380 10,680 8250 11,200 6,700 2170 7,830 00 8830 44 10000 Mashhaad 8830 00 12,5 520 9400 15,140 13,44 40 17,620 9,530 13,780 12,220 9,090 16,570 9,430 1,087 11,980 9 9,170 10,420 14,820 16,3 340 12,220 15,050 13,690 5,670 7,300 13,330 16,450 2,620 16,450 15,470 6,680 13,030 100 000 6,450 7,340 10,790 12,750 8,520 7,180 1,230 6,150 11,900 9,000 8,100 5,860 3,300 Isfahan 4460 12,520 00 5,220 3,160 6410 333 5,300 3 3,130 4,710 9,040 9,8 880 6,510 7,680 7,020 00 4620 9,360 4,80 10000 2870 10,840 7220 16,310 4,230 3190 5,740 11,040 8790 11,720 6,920 2710 8,190 Karaj 510 9400 46 620 00 5790 944 40 10,040 1870 5240 309 3,430 6620 1,060 5460 15,6 670 2870 6,510 5140 10000 6260 15,140 90 010 5790 00 1384 40 10,970 7660 7,780 2,410 4,710 2,770 18,9 910 2,950 9,050 4,550 10,320 4,920 16,620 1,520 22,100 8,980 9,890 15,180 14,520 17,510 7,570 8,480 12,330 Tabriz 726 5,970 12 1000 00 5950 15,610 11,020 5,230 2,870 13,490 10,710 9,600 10,680 2,520 9390 13,440 57 700 9440 13,840 00 0 5270 7980 10,210 11,270 815 10,120 4 4,390 9,530 13,860 5,8 800 11,330 9,090 11,830 13,330 12,000 Shiraz 10000 4,780 4,360 17,010 14,290 6,010 10,930 4,250 Ahvaz 9670 17,620 5,2 220 10,040 10,970 527 70 00 8,310 6,380 11,600 11,700 12,720 16,770 753 7,970 8 8,120 9,870 13,580 12,4 450 9,720 5,500 8,660 13,670 12,330 10000 4,720 9,060 9,070 14,470 5,440 4,100 3,970 9,260 8,920 11,840 6,120 2,840 6,410 Ghom 1510 9,530 3,1 160 1870 7660 798 80 8,310 00 4,430 135 3,210 4 4,840 2,910 7,310 13,8 890 4,740 5,700 4,920 10000 5,490 13,640 6,360 19,040 9,110 7,770 5,270 9,060 13,170 16,070 1,670 7,080 8,330 Kerman 6,380 4,430 00 nshah 5020 13,780 64 410 5240 7,780 10,210 313 1,990 9 9,420 4,180 6,600 16,2 200 4,860 1,930 2,290 10000 00 13,680 6,330 19,150 5,000 3,660 7,350 12,630 8,060 14,560 7,340 5,520 9,790 Rasht 3330 12,220 6,4 450 2870 4,920 11,27 70 11,600 4,720 5,490 493 3,840 9 9,460 1,780 2,470 17,2 260 2,000 6,920 4,830 10000 00 18,060 8,790 8,500 10,080 5,810 15,250 9,740 8,150 Kerman n 10,470 9,090 7,3 340 10,840 16,620 595 50 11,700 9,060 13,640 13,680 5,370 1,049 11,800 4 4,190 11,900 16,310 4,9 960 13,700 14,870 13,510 11,410 11,280 10000 6,330 18,060 00 23,480 7,130 9,880 13,720 9,070 6,360 Urmia 7680 16,570 10,7 790 7220 1,520 15,610 12,720 719 5,330 13 3,800 6,100 20,300 21,1 190 4,360 7,690 4,110 11,710 10,370 11,280 16,570 15,960 18,900 10000 5,370 23,480 4,530 20,670 13,640 13,110 Zahedan n 15,790 9,430 12,7 750 16,310 22,100 11,02 20 16,770 14,470 19,040 19,150 9 9,600 17,350 21,750 7,1 100 19,170 20,260 18,930 13,000 14,230 13,750 13,460 11,080 00 1,590 17,220 10000 4,930 10,490 7,190 15,900 6,980 5,640 3,090 9,530 10,250 13,230 4,790 4,170 6,680 Arak 2880 10,870 3,3 330 3090 7,260 8,15 50 7,530 1,350 3,130 0 1,880 6 6,280 3,170 6,900 14,1 160 4,340 4,370 3,620 10000 3,840 11,800 5,330 17,220 7,350 6,010 4,640 11,320 11,360 14,310 3,530 5,280 8,470 3,210 11,980 5,3 300 3,430 5,970 10,12 20 7,970 3,210 1,990 188 00 7 7,640 2,420 5,660 15,9 950 3,050 3,120 1,750 Hamedaan 10000 9,460 4,190 13,800 7,520 7,400 4,630 7,300 9,380 6,380 11,010 5,810 3,880 Yazd 6260 9,170 3,1 130 6620 12,410 4,39 90 8,120 4,840 9,420 9,600 628 7,640 160 9,490 10,600 9,270 00 7,660 12,060 9,1 10000 1,780 11,900 6,100 17,350 5,580 4,240 5,600 10,890 9,800 12,770 5,870 3,720 8,040 Ghazvin 317 2,420 n 1,520 10,420 4,7 710 1,060 4,710 9,53 30 9,870 2,910 4,180 7 7,660 00 4,350 15,5 500 1,790 5,450 4,090 10000 2,470 16,310 20,300 21,750 7,460 6,120 9,540 14,830 10,530 17,150 9,110 8,120 11,980 Ardabil 5920 14,820 9,0 040 5460 2,770 13,86 60 13,580 7,310 6,600 690 5,660 12 2,060 4,350 00 19,8 820 2,610 8,110 5,380 Bandar 100 e 000 4,960 21,190 9,520 17,190 11,740 11,620 13,880 9,320 Abbas 780 15,670 19,810 6,70 00 12,450 13,890 16,200 17,260 7,100 1,416 15,950 9 9,160 15,500 19,820 15,300 16,340 10,7 00 17,300 15,740 17,800 15,550 15,430 11,200 10000 2,000 13,700 4,360 19,170 7,400 6,060 6,970 12,260 11,600 14,590 6,540 5,560 9,410 3340 12,220 60 080 2870 2,960 10,910 434 3,050 9 9,490 1,790 2,610 15,9 990 00 6,130 2,850 Zanjan 9,720 4,740 4,860 10000 Khoram m 6,920 14,870 7,690 20,260 9,050 7,710 3,540 8,180 14,440 12,970 2,920 8,350 6,600 Abad 680 6,510 9,050 9,09 90 5,500 5,700 1,930 437 3,120 10 0,600 5,450 8,110 15,7 740 6,130 00 3,570 6,290 15,050 7,6 10000 4,830 13,510 4,110 18,930 8,980 7,640 6,470 10,620 13,070 15,930 3,030 6,990 10,100 Sanandaaj 4920 13,690 7,0 020 5140 4,550 11,83 30 8,660 4,920 2,290 362 1,750 9 9,270 4,090 5,380 17,8 800 2,850 3,570 00 10000 5,000 11,410 11,710 13,000 00 1,320 9,350 14,640 3,050 8,500 10,710 3,050 11,800 Gorgan 4,140 5,670 8,5 520 4,230 10,320 13,33 30 13,670 5,440 9,110 698 7,350 7 7,520 5,580 7,460 15,5 550 7,400 9,050 8,980 10000 3,660 11,280 10,370 14,230 1,320 00 8,040 13,340 4,360 9,680 9,400 1,970 10,490 Sari 2800 7,300 7,1 180 3190 8,980 12,00 00 12,330 4,100 7,770 564 6,010 7 7,400 4,240 6,120 15,4 430 6,060 7,710 7,640
Internationall Journal of Industriall Engineering & Production Research, Deceember 2016, Vol. 27, N No. 4
90 08 100000
M. M. Nasirii, N. Shamsi Gaamchi, S. A. Torabi
Cuckoo Optimization O Algorrithm for a Reliable …… Shahrek kord
31 19
5,380
13,330
1,2 230
5,740
9,890
5,23 30
4,780
3,970
5,270
7,350
8,790
11,280
13,750
309
4,640
4 4,630
5,600
9,540
11,2 200
6,970
3,540
6,470
9,350
8,040
10000 00
10,680
16,450
6,1 150
11,040
15,180
2,87 70
4,360
9,260
9,060
12,630
8,500
16,570
13,460
953
11,320
7 7,300
10,890
14,830
9,5 520
12,260
8,180
10,620
14,640
13,340
5,540
5,540 10000 00
12,710
10,170
6,970
6,630
2,690
14,780
9,140
11,930
4,540
14,850
6,060
15,160
9,050
11,460 8,580
Bojnurd d
8250
2,620
11,9 900
8790
14,520
13,49 90
17,010
8,920
13,170
8,060
10,080
15,960
11,080
1,025
11,360
9 9,380
9,800
10,530
15,1 130
11,600
14,440
13,070
3,050
4,360
12,710
18,010
18,010 10000 00
Birjand
11,200
16,450
9,0 000
11,720
17,510
10,710
14,290
11,840
16,070
14,560
5,810
18,900
4,530
1,323
14,310
6 6,380
12,770
17,150
11,7 740
14,590
12,970
15,930
8,500
9,680
10,170
14,780
6,500
6,500 10000 00
Ilam
6,700
15,470
8,1 100
6,920
7,570
9,60 00
6,010
6,120
1,670
7,340
15,250
7,130
20,670
479
3,530
11 1,010
5,870
9,110
11,6 620
6,540
2,920
3,030
10,710
9,400
6,970
9,140
14,850
17,810
17,810 10000 00
Semnan n
2170
6,680
57 750
2710
8,470
10,58 80
10,930
2,840
7,080
5,520
9,740
9,880
13,640
417
5,280
5 5,810
3,720
8,120
15,6 660
5,600
8,350
6,990
3,050
1,970
6,630
11,930
6,060
9,050
8,770
8,770 10000 00
Yasuj
7,830
13,030
3,3 300
8,190
12,330
2,52 20
4,250
6,410
8,330
9,790
8,150
13,720
13,110
668
8,470
3 3,880
8,040
11,980
9,3 320
9,410
6,600
10,100
11,800
10,490
2,690
4,540
15,160
11,460
8,580
9,080
Bushehrr
Tab. A.3. Reliability and cosst of some path hs Path
a
Cosst
Reliability
M-Te-I
1
1329 9
0.805
M-Sh-I
2
1914 4
0.812
M-Te-Sh-II
3
2392 2
0.733
M-Sh-Te-II
4
2729 9
0.698
M-Te-k
1
934 4
0.777
M-Sh-k
2
2288
0.856
M-Te-Sh-k k
3
2766 6
0.818
M-Sh-Te-k k
4
2334 4
0.674
M-Te-Ta
1
1509 9
0.932
M-Sh-Ta
2
2728
0.733
M-Te-Sh-Taa
3
3206 6
0.701
M-Sh-Te-Taa
4
2909 9
0.808
I-Te-M
1
1329 9
0.805
I-Sh-M
2
1914 4
0.812
I-Te-Sh-M M
3
2729 9
0.698
I-Sh-Te-M M
4
2392 2
0.734
I-Te-k
1
497 7
0.717
I-Sh-k
2
1424 4
0.876
I-Te-Sh-k
3
2329 9
0.754
I-Sh-Te-k
4
1560 0
0.690
I-Te-Ta
1
1072 2
0.859
I-Sh-Ta
2
1954 4
0.751
Internationall Journal of Industriall Engineering & Production Research, Deceember 2016, Vol. 27, N No. 4
9,080 10000 00
320
M. M. M Nasiri, N. Sham msi Gamchi & S. A. A Torabi
Cuckoo Optimization O Algorrithm for a Reliab ble …
I-Te-Sh-Taa
3
2769 9
0.646
I-Sh-Te-Taa
4
2135
0.827
K-Te-M
1
934 4
0.777
K-Sh-M
2
2288
0.856
K-Te-Sh-M M
3
2334 4
0.674
K-Sh-Te-M M
4
2766 6
0.818
K-Te-I
1
497 7
0.717
K-Sh-I
2
1424 4
0.876
K-Te-Sh-I
3
1560 0
0.690
K-Sh-Te-I
4
2329 9
0.754
K-Te-Ta
1
677 7
0.829
K-Sh-Ta
2
2328
0.791
K-Te-Sh-Taa
3
2374 4
0.623
K-Sh-Te-Taa
4
2509 9
0.872
Ta-Te-M
1
1509 9
0.932
Ta-Sh-M
2
2728
0.733
Ta-Te-Sh-M M
3
2909 9
0.808
Ta-Sh-Te-M M
4
3206 6
0.701
Ta-Te-I
1
1072 2
0.859
Ta-Sh-I
2
1954 4
0.751
Ta-Te-Sh-II
3
2135
0.827
Ta-Sh-Te-II
4
2769 9
0.646
Ta-Te-k
1
677 7
0.829
Ta-Sh-k
2
2328
0.791
Ta-Te-Sh-kk
3
2509 9
0.872
Ta-Sh-Te-kk
4
2374 4
0.623
Follow w This Article at The T Following Site G N, Torab bi S A. Cuckoo Optimization O Alg gorithm for a Nasiri M M, Shamsi Gamchi a the Clientts. IJIEPR. 2016;; 27 (4) :309Reliable Location-Alloocation of Hubs among RL: http://ijiepr.iiust.ac.ir/article-1 1-644-en.html 320 UR Internationall Journal of Industriall Engineering & Production Research, Deceember 2016, Vol. 27, N No. 4