Density functional theory calculations of nuclear ...

6 downloads 0 Views 785KB Size Report
[35] LOVAS, F. J., and JOHNSON, D. R., 1973, J. cheitl. PI~vs.: 59. 7-37. ... ROBERT. J . B., MARSH. R. E., and ROBERTS. J., 1973. noel m:~rmik)gr. H, 29. 1611.
Density functional theory calculations of nuclear quadrupole coupling constants with calibrated 1 4 quadrupole ~ moments E. SICILIA'. G. DE LUCA', S. CHIODO? N . RCJSSO'*, P CALAMINICI~,', A. M . KOSTER~%and K . JUG?. ' Dipartimc.nto di Chimica. Universita della Calabria, 87037 Arcavacata di Kcnde (CS). Italy 'Theoretische Chemie. LlniversitSt Hannovcr. Am Kleinen Felde 30, 30167 Hannover, Germany %cpartamallo de Quimica, CINVESTAV, Av. Institute Politecnico Nacional 2508, A.P. 14-740 Mexico D.F. 07000. Mexico

Density functional c:tlculations of the electric field gradient tensor at the nitrogen nucleus in 13 test molecules. containing 14 nilrogen sites, have been performed using the linear combina~ion ofciaussian-tyy*: orbital Kohn-Sham density functiond theory (LCGTO-KSDFT) approxch. Local and gradient corrected functional.; were used for all-electron calculations. All the inolecular structurts were optimized at their respective levels of theory with extentled basis sets. Calibrated 14N nuclear quadrupole monlents were chtained through a fitting procedull: between calculated electric lield gradients and experi~nen~al nuclear quadrupok: coupling constants of the test set of ~noleculesfor each basis set and funclional considered. With these calibrated I4N nuclear quadrupok moment^ tllz nuclear quadrupok coupling constants o r the fillowing selecttxl systems were derem-niined: Huoron~ethylisonitrile,pyridine, pyrrole, inladazole. .pyrazole. 1.8-bis(dime1hy1-amino)n;1phrhde1~.c y c l o i e ~ r m e t h y l e ~ l e ~ e t r r ~ n i t r a ~ n i n ~ . cocaine and heroin.

1. Introduction Developments in density Suunctional theory (DFT) during the last decade have provided a new and increasingly powerful loo1 for the calculation of lnolecular properties. Attenlion has been focused recently on electrostatic properties [ 1 4 ] and nuclear quadrupolc. coupling constants [SS] (NQCCs) and nuclear quadrupole resonance (NQR) frequencies [9]. The NQCCs can be obtained experinlentally by microwave spectroscopy [10-121. Usually. accurate values for NQCCs can be found in the literature only for m a l l molecules. A theoretical contribution is therefore highly desirable to close this gap and to extend thc applicability of NQR spectroscopy. A step in this direction was given by the works of Ludwig cJt NI., who suggested and performed calculations [ l j , 141 with a generalized scheme for the prcdiction of NQCCs at the Hartree-Fock and highly correlated levels of theory. We adopted their scheme of DFT calc~~lations and demonstrated that there is a greater variability due to the choice ~ ~only o t of difTerent basis sets but also of diiTerent f~mctionals.The success of this work on "0 compounds [15] ~notivatedus to extend * A u ~ h o ihr r correspondence e-mail: nrusso@$unicd.it

the work to the quadrupole moment calibration ol' L 4 ~ For this nucleus the most recently determined value [16] of the nuclear quadrupole mon~enlis 2.044(3) fm'. Very reccntly Bailey [8] investigated thc efficacy of DFT nlcthods for the calculation of '% coupling constants using several exchange-correlation f~mctionalsand basis sets and employing, Tor the calibration procedure, the experimental gecmetries of the target molecules. As a lirst step in our work we describe the calibralion results for the test lnolecules NF,, N2, HCN, CF;CN, HCCCN, FCCCN, CH;CN. NH3, CNCN. IJF2.NH2, FCN, HCCNC, and CF3NC, for which accurate experinlental NQCCs are available. For all the n~oleculesconsidered? f ~ dgeometry l optimization has been perftmned. B a e d on the results we then apply the method for the NQCCs calculation to other nlediunl and large size nitrogen containing compounds, including aromatic (pyridine, pyrrole, irnidazole, pyrazole, 1.8-bis(dimethyl-an1ino)ilaphthalene) and other ring systems (cyclotetrar~~etl~yleneteI~a~~itramiie , cocaine, heroin). 2. Computational details All the calculations have been performed using the density Sunctional program Allchenl [17] in which both

,2Iolrr.zrli~rYt~y,si[.s ISSN 0076-.YWh p~int/lSS%11362 -3028 online !:,2001 Taylor & Ik~ncisLtd hr tp:i:i\-\~~ ;A~~JI.C~.>.II~!~(?IITIIAIS D01: 10.l OSOlO02M9701I Ol)42XZ O

.

the linear conlbination of Gaussian-type orbital local spin density (LCGTO-LSD) and the corresponding generalized gradient approximation (LCGTO-GGA) methods are imple~nented.For the local spin density calculations the exchange correlation functional proposed by Vosko er d. [18] (VWN) has been used. The gradient corrected density f~~nctionals chosen are those oT Perdew and Wang [19] and Pcrdew [20] (PW86-P86). of Becke [21] and Perdew (B88-P86) and Becke and Lee et (11. [22. 231 (B88-LYP). The orbital basis sets enlployed were the TZVP [24], EPR-111 [25? 261 and A N 0 [27]. For fitting the density the auxiliary fuiunction set A2 [24] was used. All molecular structures werc fully optimized using analytical energy gradients and the Berny qmsiNewton update [2S]. The theoretical evaluation 01' NQCCs requires the calculation of thc electric field gradient (EFG) tensor at a nucleus. Indeed, the largest absolute conlponent of the Waceless EFG tensor Y,, in its principal axis system is related to the corresponding nuclear quadrupole coupling constant by

2 Q TL, x ( M H ~= ) -= h

2.3496Qiin fin') TJ,,(in au), ( 1)

whcre the factor 2.3496 includes all thc constants and takes care 01' thc units. T o obtain a unique orientation of the principal axis system at 1he nucleus we used the convention:

For the calculalion of the EFG tensor colnponenls a1 the m~cleusof interest. lhe following expression is used

PI :

where the first tern1 on the right of equation (3) represents the contribution to the EFG tensor conlponents from the electrons, whereas the second term represents the contribution from nuclei A with charge Z. The notation (plA(~,+ I3))v) is used Tor the electric field gradient integrals over contracted Gaussian-type orbitals. P,,,, are elen~entsof the density matrix and the summation over A refers to all atoms of the molecules except that for which the calculation is performed. For the calc~rlation of these integrals a newly developed algorithm based on that of Obara and Saika [29] and of McMurchie and Davidson [30] was used. After obtaining lhese E F G components the traceless tensor

V is diagonal~zedto obtam 11s principal components chosen according to the convention oT equation (2). The eigenvalues of the EFG tensor. C',,, I;,) and TTzI. and the cal~brated''N quadrupolc inolnent Q h a w bcen used to calculate NQCCs and rl throush equation (1) and

3. Calculation of I4N nuclear quadrupole moments In order to calibrate the "N ~ ~ u c l e aquadrupole r moment, the n~olecularstructures oT the target ~nolecules were optimized by using local and gradient corrected Tunctionals and diflerent extended basis sets. A co~nparisonbetween optimized molecular structures and available experin~entalones [-71--77], from table I, shows that better general agreement is obtained by using the VWN l'unctional. T o derive the calibrated D F T 1 4 nuclear ~ quadrupolt. nmnlent a least-squares linear regression analysis of the calculated T', (table 2) versus the corresponding experimental NQCCs [38-491, was employed. In tablc 3 the calibrated DFT "N nuclear quadrupole moments Q and the corresponding correlation coefficients, Tor dill-ere111 functionals and basis sets, are listed. The best correlation coeficient is obtained by using the local VWN functional, as expected due to the agreement between theoretical and experimental geometries. and the EPKlIlIA2 basis set. It is worth noting that the correlation coeflicient obtained at the same level of theory with the relalively small TZVI'IA2 basis and auxillary function sets is allnost identical. This result indicates that the relatively small and co~l~pulationallyless expensive TZVPIA3 basis is appropriate for highly accurate NQCC calculations. In this last case the good ayeemen1 can be ascribed to lhe fact the basis set is oplimized fix local DFT calculations, and we may conclude that DFT optimized basis set may be used to conqxnsate for some failures in the functionals. A graphical display of the derived calibrated quadrupole monlents against the diiTeren1 functionals is given in figure 1 for all the basis sets used. For a given basis set the corresponding Q show a non-negligible dependence on lhe functional. The calibrated values of Q for the VWN Tunctional are. generally, larger than the GGA values. Althougli it is not the goal of this work to obtain an accurate Q value for ' 4 ~ the 7 values obtained are all close to the rccomnlended experimental value 01' 2.044 fin2 reported in [I_(].This value corresponds lo a scale factor oT 0.975. 11 is noteworthy that our best calibrated value (I.!M2 lin2) agrees with that (1 .!MI (2) fl') obtained by Bailey [8] at B3PW9116-311+ G(df,pd) level using for the calibration 39 lnolecules at experi-

Table 1.

Bond lzngths ( i n

Molecule

Bdsis

Slructure

NFI

TZVPIA?

NF FNF

EPR-IIIIAZ AN OIA2 N2 HCN

TZVPIA2 EPR-IIIIAZ .4N 0 1A2 TZVPIA2

NN

CN HC

EPR-IIl1.U AN OIA? C'F3CN

TZVPlA2

CN CC FC FCC

HCC'CN

TZVPIA2

CN CC CC HC

EPR-I II1.U

FCCCN

TZVPIA2

CN C7C

c:c

FC EPR-IIIIA1

CN CC HC HCC

A)and angles (in cleg) for optimird molecular structures VWN

PW86-P86

B88-P86

B88-L'r-P

Exp.

Table 1. Molecule

Basis

Structure

EP R-1IIIA2

AN 0 1A2

NH.7

TZVPlA2

NH HNH

EPR-IlII.42 .4N 01.42 CNCN

TZVPIA?

CN NC C'N

EPR-IIIIAZ

ANOlA2

BF2NH2

TZVPIA7

BF BN NH FBF HNB

EPR-IIIIA2

FCN

TZVPIA7

CN FC

EPR-I I I1.U

HC'CNC

TZVPIA2

EPR-IIIIA2

NC CN CC HC

W N

li~ntir~tled

PW86-PS6

B88-P86

B88-L'rT

Esp.

Molecule

Basis

Structure

C'CFINC

TZVPlA2

CN NC FC FCN

EPR-1 IIIM

AN OIA2

W N

PW86-P86

B88-P86

B88-LkT

1.075 1.395 1.181 1.333 109.2 1.398 1.174 1 .326 109.3 1.393 1.178 1.328 109.3

1.068 1.410 1.189 1.359 109.1 1.413 1.182 1.353 109.2 1.393 1.178 1.328 109.3

1.071 1.409 1.185 1.347 109.3 1.41 3 1.183 1.345 109.1 1.409 1.186 1.348 109.1

1.068 1.413 1.188 1.359 109.2 1.416 1.1871.354 109.1 1.416 1.183 1.354 109.3

Esp.

1.407* 1.171" 1.324" 108.8'

"Refirzncx [31]. k~rference[32]. 'Refzrzncx [33]. "~efzrznw[MI. 'Rzfennce [35]. '~eference[36]. Rzference [37]. mental geometries. By using the calibsated D F T "N quadrupole moment, NQCCs for the target molecules have been calculated with the aid of equation (1). They are listed in table 4 together with thc experitncntal values. The correlalion between calculated and experiment NQCCs is plotted in figure 3. Both table 4 and figure 7 reveal that the local VWN values are closer to the experiment, the ~naximunlerror being 0.13, 0.33 and 0.65 MHz for the TZVP. EI'KIII m d A N 0 basis sets, respectively. The corresponding average errors are 0.13 MHz for TZVPlA2, 0.13, MHz for EPRIIIlA2 and 0.23 MHz for ANOIA2. We underline again that the calibrated 1 4 VWNITZVP ~ value of quadrupole moment is accurate enough for reliable prediciioris o l "N NQCCs. Figure 3 presents the calculated NQCCs (N) using experimental structure parameters at VWN/EI'K-I11 level of theory in conjunction to the "N recommended value [15] or Q = 7.044 fm2. The deviations in these calculated NQCCs with respect to the experinlental ones is reduced by using both experimental structure (0) and optimized paramelers (0) coupled with the calibraied "N nuclear quadrupole moment at the same level of theory. 4. Application to aromatic and other ring systems In order to prove the uscfulncss of the prcsenl approach, we hake carried out thc conlputation of the EFG tensor con~ponents,f r o n ~which thc NQCC and the asynmctry parameter 71 can be obtaincd. for s o n ~ c aromatic and non-aromatic compound\. On the basis of the results of the calibration of the "N quadrupole moment. the EPRIllIA2 basis in conjunction with the VWN functional were used for these computations. The n~olecularstructu~ es (31 all the selected compounds were l ~ ~ l optimi~ed ly at t h ~ slewl of theory.

4.1. Aromatic sysrsns Nuclear quadrupole constants and anisotropy parameters, calculated using the procedure just discussed, of the selected aro~naticsystem are listed in table 5 along will] cspcrimental values. Coupling constants have derived from microwave spectra for pyridine [50. 511, pyrrolc [52], imidazole [53], and pyrazole [53]. The agreement between expcrimental and theorelical values for these four hctcrocyclic conlpounds is good. with a larger deviation being found in the case of i~niclaiole.The differences with rcspect to a recent theoretical evaluation 1161 of NQCCs for thc same molecules rcfect thc differences in the approach used in the calibralion procedure. The aromatic diamine 118-bis(di~nethyla~nino)naphlhalcne (DMAN) has already attracted considerable attention for iis structure :und properties. The crystal and molecular structure of DMAN have been determined by X-ray drffraction [54]. It has been shown that the molecule is strained, wilh a large dcviation of the naphthalene skeleton from planarity. The central C C bond is twisted so that the N(CH3)? groups are on dnerent sides of the naphthalene plane. On the basis of a previous uh inito and fluorescence study [55] the optimization of the geometry for two difTerent conformations of the molecule has been performed. The structure of the most stable conformer is depicted in figure 4 and the corresponding most relevant geometrical parameters are reported in table 6 and compared will1 those obtained in the crystallographic studies. Results o l calculations coniirm that the n~oleculeis markedly non-planar and has C symme~ry in the absence of any crystal packing forces. The values of the largest conlaoncuts of the EFGs for the nitrogen atoms in DMAN have been determined by Wozniak cr crl. with "N NQR spectroscopy a i room temperature

E. Sicilia cl 01. Table 2. Molecule

NF;

N2 HC'N

CF;CN

H CCCN

FCCCN

CHlCN

NH? CNCN#

BF2NH2

FCN

HC'CNC

CF;NC

CNKN

Calculated principal components Vr, ( i n au) of the clec~riclield gradient tensor for difTerent e x c l ~ a n g e ~ o r r c l a i ofut~ctionals n and basis sels using optimizd nmolecular structures.

Basis

VWN

PWP86-P86

B88-P86

B88-LYP

TZVPI A? EPR-IIIlA2 ANOlA2 TZVPIA2 EPR-IIIlA2 ANOIA2 TZVPI A2 EPR-IIIIA2 .WO/A2 TZVPIA2 EPR-IIIIA? ANOIA? TZVPI A2 EPR-IIIIA2 ANOlA2 TZVPIA? EPR-I IlIA3 ANOIA2 TZVPlA2 EPR-IIIIA2 .AN OlA2 TZVPI A? EPR-IlIIA3 ANOIA? TNPIA2 EPR-IIIlA2 AN OIA? TZVPI A? EPR-IIIIA? ANOlA2 TZVPIA2 EPR-I IIIA? ANOIA1 TZVPI A? EPR-IIIIA2 .WO/A2 TZVPIAZ EPR-I IIIA? ANOIA? TZVPI A2 EPR-IIIIA2 .WO/A2

[56] and at 77 K [57]. Thc authors, assuming a value of 2.02 lin' for "N nuclear quadrupole constant [58] and measuring the components of the EFG tcnsor, have obtained the corresponding nuclear quadrupolc coupling constants for thc two non-cquivalent nitrogns reported in table 5. It is evident that the good agreement of the calculated values with the experimental ones obtained at 77 K is due to the increase of sylnnletry of

the moleculc at low tcmpcraturcs, whik thc discrepancy in the anisotropy paramcter rcflccts thc crystallographic

environment. 4 . 2 . Otlwr riirg s,v.stc~rns The calculated coupling constants and asymmetry paramenters for the selected other ring conlpounds are collected in table 7 together with the experimental

Table 3. Cklibraretl nuclear quadrupole nom me nts Q (in fm'). for the density funcctiond methods considered obtaitml by using the correlation berrveen the calculated V z , (table 2) and the experimental nuclear quadrupok coupling constants y. The corresponding correlation codficients are reportal in parentheses.

Basis TZVPI A? EPRl IUA2 ANOIA',

Figure 1.

VWN

PW86-P86

BS8-P86

BSR-LYP

2.0162 (0 9974) 1.9922. (0 9979) 2.011 1 (0.9969)

1.0750 (0.9891) 1.9711 (0.9921) 2.Wl I (0.989 1)

2.0037 (0.9918) 1.9976 (0.9041 ) 2.020 1 (0.9920)

1.9773 (0.9898) 1.962.3 (0.9917) 1 .9871 (0.9893)

2

Dependenct: of the calibrated ''N nuclear qudrupole molnent (in fin ) on the excl~ailge-corl~I~~tic>n functional and basis ser .

results. The choice of lhese liloleculcs is due to considerable dlim made in recent years to use '%. Lhrougli NQR spectroscopy, as a sensor for the detection or colnpounds with physiological or energetic interest. The o p t i m i d structure of Lhe cyclotetranietliylei~etetranitramine (0-HMX) is reported in figure 5. In tliis molecule there are four peripheral and Tour ring nitrogen atoms. but because of the C2 type rotational symmetry about the line joining the atoms N(2) and N(6). the nitrogen atoms can be grouped in four pairs. two in tlie ring and two in the peripheral NO, groups, each pair containing two equivalent "N nuclei. Experi-

nientally nuclear quadrupole interaction parameters (1 and TI) have been measured for ring nitrogens by the conventional NQR teclinique [59] and tl~rouglithe use or special double-resonance techniques [MI for tlic two pairs or equivalent nuclei in Lhe NO2 groups. For tlie two sets or ring nuclei, termed equatorial and axial. the measured coristaiits and anisotropy parameters have been assigned on h e basis of he temperature dependance of h e NQR frequencies. On the other hand. no assiglin~entsof the nuclear quadrulmlc interaction parameters has been made experinlentally for the peripheral nitrogen nuclei. We have calculated the coupling

1046

1

E. Sicilia

cl 01.

NF, N2

3 HCN 4 CF3CN

5 HCCCN 6 FCCCN 7 CH,CN NH3

9 CNCN# 10 BF2NH2

11 FCN 12 HCCNC

Exp. NQCC ( M H z )

Exp. NQCC (MHz)

B88-P86

-8

-7

-6

-5

-4

-3

-2

-1

0

1

2

-8

-7

-6

Exp. NQCC (MHz)

Figure 2.

-5

-4

-3

-2

-1

0

1

BP. NQCC W )

Cwnparison between calculated and measured nuclear quadrupole coupling constants (in MHz).

constants and the asymmetry parameter for ' 4 nuclei ~ hotli in the ring and in peripheral NO, groups, attempting in the latter case an assignment of the observed values. Analysing the results reported in table 7, it appears ihat there is excelleni agreement hetween theory and experiment, the larpest deviation being lound in the values of ihe asynmetr y paranieier for the ring nitrogen atoms. Experiinental information on the 'N nuclear quadrupole interaction of cocainc and heroin molecules is available [61, 631. In both n~olecules,see figures 6 and 7, there is one ' 4 nucleus, ~ and then only one set 01 nuclear quadrupole interaction parameless, 2 and 17, has been observed experimenta.11~by NQR spectroscopy in polycrystalline samples. The agreement beiween theoretical

and experinlent NQCC \ d u e s is satisfactory (see table 7), hut poorer than for the previously considered co111pounds not. included in the calibration. The source of the existing discrepancies can be the use of the ophlizcd geometrical structures in conjunction with the calibraied Q va.lues. Indeed, this coupling, as shown in iipure 3 for the NF, molrtcule. could be a rough choice for the com~ u t a t i o nof NQCCs. Moreover, the influence of the environnleni would also not be neglected. 5.

Conclusion

Wc have r e p r i e d thc values of the nuclear quadru-

pole moments of ''N obiaincd through a calibration procedure in ihe lraniework o l density lu~ictional theory. The calibration involved ihe optimization o l

Table 4. Molecule NF:

N2 HCN

C'FqCN

HCC'CN

FC'CC'N

CH;C'N

NH;

CNCN#

BF2NH2

FCN

HCC'NC

C'FqNC

CN E N

Calculatecl nuclear quadrupole coupling constanis x (in MHz) using optimized nmolec~~lar structures ;md calibrated nuclear q u a d r u p l e moments. Basis

VWN

PWP86-P86

B88-P86

B88-LYI'

Exp.

T Z W I A2 EPR-IIIIA2 AN01 A2 TZVP1.42 EPR-IIIlA2 AN01A2 TZWlA2 EPR-IIIIA? AN01A? TZVP/,4? EPR-IIIIA2 ANOIA2 T Z W I A2 EPR-IIIIA? ANOlA2 TZVPIA2 EPR-IIIIAZ ANOIA2 TZVPI A2 EPR-IIIIA? ANOIA? TZVPI A2 EPR-IIIIA2 AN01A2 TZVPIA? EPR-IIIlA2 ANOIA? TZVPIAZ EPR-IIIIA2 ANO1.42 TZVPIA? EPR-IIIlA2 ANOIA:! TZWIA2 EI'R-IIIlA2 ANO1.42 TZVPI A3 EPR-IIIlA2 ANOIA2 TZWIA2 EPR-IIIIA? ANOIA?

"Reference [3X]. "~eference[39]. ' Reference [MI. "~eference[41]. "Referenw [42]. '~eference[43]. 'Rel'erence [MI. '~eference[45]. [46]. .i~e~el-ence 1471. "~eference1481. '~eferencc:[49].

i Rel'erence

peolnetrical paranlelers and the calculation uf the EFG tensors at several levels of theory for a chosen set of molecules. Since cxperinlcntal structural data are not enlployed, the techniclue used can greatly expand the range of the theoretical description of NQR spectro-

scopy. This nlipht help in obtaining nlore reliable knowlcdgc of many i~npurtantclasses of cu~npouildfor which experimental information is not available or has to be interpreted. By using the nuclear cluadrupole nlornents obtained, highly accurate NQCCs were calculated for

2

Geom. ExpJQ

ref

0

-2

-4

-6

Geom. ExpJQcaI

0

Exp. NQCC (MHz) Figure 3.

Comparison brtwzen nleasured and VWNIEPR-I11 calculated. by using diferent approaches, nuclear quadrupole coupling consrants (in MHz).

Table 5.

'

4 I I~L L C ~ I Tqundrupok

coupling constr1ni.s y (in MHL) and a sqlnmetl) paranlerer systelns.

Nucleus

Pyndine Pq rrole Imidazole Pyra~ole DMAN

- 2.691 No) N(3) N(1) N(2) N(11) N(13)

Exy.

Theory

Exp.

-4.87 f0.01" - 4.908~ - 2.704' - 2.537" - 4.032" - 3.03d -4.4~~ 5.5541 ' : 5.6315 5.6033"; 5.6975'

0.394

0.43"

0.101 0.149 0.083 0 503 0.673 0.018 0.014

0.04' 0.18" 0.12" 0.523" 0.647" 0.0419': 0.0302' 0.0439': 0.0385 !

Tl~eory - 5.071

- 2.501 -

4.104

- 3.053 - 4.53 1

5.541 5.563

for aronlaric

'I

Y

Molecule

7,

'

"Referencv [%I. "~ei'erence[51]. 'Relkrence [51]. "~eferencv[53]. 'Reference [57]. ' ~ e l r e n c t [%I. :

medium and large size systems. The best correlated value of the nuclear quadrupole momcnt was obtained by using the VWN lunctional in conjunction with the cxtended EPKIlllA2 basis and auxiliary sets. Finally. the value of the correlation coeficient for Q calibration, obtained using the same furlcfional and the less computalional expensive TZVP basis s e ~is, allnost identical to

the VWNIEPR-Ill. Then, the corresponding value of Q is highly recommended for studying medium and large s i ~ esystenls to obtain reliable results. Work is in progrcss in our laboratories to extend the same calibralion method to the density functional evaluation of nuclear quadrupole inornents for other nuclei of chemical interest.

'.,5 n.

Figure 1.

Table 6.

Figure 5.

Numbering scheme and atomic arrangement of DMAN molecule.

Selecrecl ~eomerricalparameters (in DMAN.

Parameter

VWNIEPRIII

C(1)-C(6) C(5)-C(6) CI(4)-C(5) C(3)-C(4) C(S'kN(1 I) N( 11)-C(12) C(4)-C(5)-C(h) C(3)-c'(4)-C(5) C(6)-C(5]-N(1 I ) C(5)-N( 1 1)-C(12) CI( 5)-N(I 1)-C( 1 5) C(Z)-C(3)-C(4)-C(S) C(1)-C(6)-C'(5j-N( 11) C(6)-C(5)-N(l l)-C'( 12) C(6)-C(5)-N(lI)-C(15)

1.419 1.434, 1.135 1.383, 1.385 1.392, 1.395 1.389. 1.391 1.441. 1.MO 11Y.l. 119.0 122.1. 121.8 120.9, 170.7 117.5, 117.4 116.0, 116.3 3.3, 3.1 166.4, 1fh.O - 56. I . - 6 . 6 167.8. 167.5

Nu~nberingscheme and alomic arrangement of 3HMX molecule.

A. deg) of up."

1.425 1.429. 1.408 1.383. 1.353 1.387. 1.410 1.395, 1.399 1.465, 1.165 119.4 118.6 121.4: 121.4 120.8. 120.1 118.5 118.0 117.1. 117.2 3.0, 3.0 168.5, 167.9 - 59.4, -60.6 162.7: 160.9

,;

Figure 6. A ~ o m i carrangelnent of cocaine molecule.

"Reference [.j4]. For double entries the first refe~sto the parameter denoted in the lirst columq while the second the o t h a half of the naphthalene system. entry refers

This work was partially supported by the VlGONl exchange program. Finailcia1 support fiom thc Universit5 clegli Studi Calacria and MURST is gatefully acknowledged. References [l] D UFFY . P.. CHONG D . P.. ;md Dnrurs, M., 1095. J . chum.. P / Q x , 102, 3312. [2] K ~ S T E K -4. , M.. LEBOIJF,M.: and S ALAHUB , D . R.. 1996, T/worcticd m ~ dC'an~pirtirio?ui/C:/~etni.rtr)*.Vol. 3, edited by .I.S. Murray and K . Sen (Amslerdan~:Elsevier).

Figure 7.

Atomic arrangement of heroin ~nolecule.

Table 7.

"N nuclex yuxlrupok coupling constants 1 (in MHz) and asymmetry parameter ring systems.

8-H MX

for other

'I

X

Molec~ilz

1)

Nucleus

Theor

Exp.

Thzory

Exp.

N(10). N(13) N(9). N(11) N(2). N(6) N(4). N(8)

0.840 0.703 (7.098 6.175 5.753 5.955

0.810" 0.806" 5.791" 6.025~ 5.02YL 5.3136"

0.005 0.02 3 0.445 0.378 0.074 0.017

0.42" 0.4gR (1.4977~ 0.51 80" 0.395" 0.028~

Cocaine Heroin

"Reference [(d)]. "~zference[SO]. 'Reference [(,I]. "~ei~erence [(,?I

[3] De L UCA . G., SI(.ILIA,E., RUSSO.N.. and T o s c ~ ~h4., o. 1995. J. clicm. Pltys.. 105, 2306. [4] LEHOIJF. L., K ~ ~ S T GM.. R . and S ALAHIJU . D . R., 1997. Tlic!orct.