Dermatoglyphics in diabetes

Short report

Dermatoglyphics in diabetes: a prospective diagnostic aid and early preventive tool Introduction Dermatoglyphics are ridged patterns on the palmar and plantar surfaces of humans (fingerprints, palm prints and foot prints), which develop approximately between the 13th and 18th weeks of gestation. They manifest complex genetic backgrounds that are currently not fully explained, but polygenic multifactorial inheritance is the most agreed upon inheritance mechanism.1,2 Among the numerous quantitative and qualitative dermatoglyphic traits, commonly assessed variables include: fingerprint patterns (whorl, loop, or arch), finger ridge counts (total [TFRC] and absolute [AFRC]), palmar angles (‘atd’, ‘adt’, and ‘dat’), palmar a–b ridge counts, and palmar axial triradius positions (t, t’, t’’). (See Figures 1 and 2.) This article refers to recent widespread research which has drawn attention to dermatoglyphic differences between individuals or groups affected by diabetes and those without diabetes; such research highlights the possibility of employing dermatoglyphic differences as diagnostic aids and preventive tools to alert those with a genetic predisposition. The strengths and weaknesses of these studies are underlined, thus serving as a guide for future research in this area.

Dermatoglyphics: medical aspects Clinical research on dermatoglyphics highlights the possibility of employing these as preventive counselling techniques and/or diagnostic aids for several disorders, with such studies generally following two types of analysis techniques. The first involves an indirect method which underlines the importance of realising that dermatoglyphic deviations manifested in affected subjects might reflect environmental and/or genetic stresses (developmental noise) during prenatal development; these have been shown to be attributable to the generation of

50

PRACTICAL DIABETES VOL. 32 NO. 2

A

B

C

Figure 1. The three basic fingerprint patterns: (A) whorls; (B) loops; (C) arches. Ridge counts are determined by drawing lines that connect the core/centre of the patterns with the respective delta (triradius), thus yielding two ridge counts for the whorls, one for the loops, and none for the arches (since they lack a delta). (Images taken from Google and in the public domain, further edited and arranged together for convenience)

random deviations from the expected bilateral symmetry of organisms quantifiable as the degree to which fluctuating asymmetry is present within phenotypic traits.3,4 The second involves the direct comparison of dermatoglyphic variations among affected/predisposed subjects relative to the healthy norm; a case control study design is used, aiming to single out peculiarities that are distinctive to the affected individuals or those with an ascertained risk of developing diabetes. Fluctuating asymmetry has recently turned out to be a valuable tool popularly employed to quantify the effects of developmental noise faced by fetuses on the eventual physical and psychological states of wellbeing during adolescence or

adulthood.3,4 Stressors during prenatal development have been shown to cause fluctuating asymmetry in varying degrees, with such factors as extreme temperatures, environmental pollution, psychological stress, population density and inbreeding being significantly associated with its manifestation.3–6

Fluctuating asymmetry and diabetes It has recently been shown that fetuses whose mothers have faced hunger during their prenatal development have a higher risk of developing diabetes later during their lives as adults.7,8 Similarly, a group of researchers measured the glucose tolerances of adolescents whose mothers had been exposed to the

COPYRIGHT © 2015 JOHN WILEY & SONS

Short report Dermatoglyphics in diabetes

catastrophic 1998 Quebec ice storm; it was found that, among the adolescents, the severity of maternal stress experienced was directly proportional to increased insulin secretions and central obesities, both of which are recognised risk factors for the development of diabetes.9 Increases in insulin levels are known to be an early feature of insulin resistance that gradually lead to diabetes.10,11 Such findings point to the importance of measuring prenatal developmental homeostasis to assess a possible predisposition to diabetes, with dermatoglyphic variables being able to play a pivotal role in quantifying the degree to which such stressors have affected the fetuses.4,9,12,13

Dermatoglyphic case control studies For most of the parameters evaluated by such studies, distinctions among the parameters of significance vary from one report to another; more strikingly, some findings contradict those reported by their counterparts, even those done from the same subcontinent. With this in mind, the most commonly shared findings among studies that at this stage can be cited to have positive predictive values – being indicative of a predisposition to diabetes – include: a decrease in ulnar loops on the digits entailing a simultaneous increase in the whorls;14,15 increased mean palmar and digital ridge counts;16,17 increased palmar ‘atd’ angles,18,19 and distally deviated axial triradii20,21 for type 2 diabetes; and an overall increase in whorls with simultaneously decreased loops,22 more pronounced on the left thumbs of the diabetic group23 for type 1 diabetes. Drawbacks of the studies so far There are several weaknesses in the studies done thus far, possibly explaining the numerous contradictory findings among them. The foremost drawback relates to the noticeably low sample sizes in the majority of studies. Age and sex matched standard case control studies following predefined calculated sample sizes are limited. Secondly, some studies have not distinguished between the types of diabetes mellitus, with a few studies having included both types of diabetes in their case group, despite


c

b

a

d t” t’ t

Figure 2. Different palmar triradii. The ‘atd’, ‘dat’, and ‘adt’ angles are measured after drawing lines connecting the ‘a’, ‘d’ and ‘t’ triradii. (Adapted from Gasiorowski A, Hajn V. A report on the occurrence of accessory triradii in the subdigital area, and carpal triradii on the palm in Polish and Czech populations. Anthropol Rev 2000;63:127–32)

the fact that their aetiologic features and underlying genetic mechanisms are very distinct. Thirdly, due consideration regarding the age of onset of diabetes has not been a focus for most studies; this might have important implications given that variants of type 2 diabetes itself exist and these differ, among other features, in their ages of onset. The fourth drawback observed in the majority of the studies is that, in their case groups, they overlook the possible occurrence of other commonly concurrent disorders such as hypertension and cardiac disorders, each of which have their own effects on dermatoglyphics.24,25 Finally, only a limited number of studies12 have emphasised the importance of prenatal developmental disturbances (measured by fluctuating asymmetry) in comparisons of cases and controls.

and ascertained resistance/susceptibility genes for the disorders. Secondly, any study which is to be conducted in the future regarding dermatoglyphic markers in diabetes should adhere to the standard case control study designs with ample and pre-defined sample sizes. Thirdly, due emphasis should also be given to the importance of differentiating between the diabetes types and subtypes, as well as the commonly occurring manifestations of concurrent disorders such as hypertension and cardiac disorders among the cases, which, per se, have an impact on dermatoglyphic manifestations. Seile Yohannes,1 Lecturer, Genetics Getachew Alebie,1 Lecturer, Biomedical Science Lemessa Assefa,1 Lecturer, Reproductive Health

Recommendations Future investigators ought to carry out more intensive research eliciting the genetic background of the various dermatoglyphic traits. This is invaluable in generating a framework in order to understand better the underlying mechanism by which dermatoglyphic traits are related to the various disorders with which they have been associated, thereby establishing a link between these genes

1Jigjiga

University, Jigjiga, Ethiopia

Correspondence to: Seile Yohannes, Jigjiga University, PO Box 1020, Jigjiga, Ethiopia; email: [email protected]

References References are available in Practical Diabetes online at www.practical diabetes.com.


51

Short report Dermatoglyphics in diabetes

References 1. Penrose LS. Dermatoglyphics. Sci Am 1969;221(6): 72–83. 2. Medland S, et al. Linkage analysis of a model quantitative trait in humans: finger ridge count shows significant multivariate linkage to 5q14.1. PLoS Genet 2007;3(9):1736–43. 3. Livshits G, Kobyliansky E. Fluctuating asymmetry as a possible measure of the developmental homeostasis in humans. Hum Biol 1991;63:441–66. 4. Pechenkina EA, et al. Genetic and environmental influence on the asymmetry of dermatoglyphic traits. Am J Phys Anthropol 2000;111:531–43. 5. Graham JH, et al. Fluctuating asymmetry: methods, theory, and applications. Symmetry 2010;2: 466–540. 6. Benderlioglu Z. Fluctuating asymmetry and steroid hormones: a review. Symmetry 2010;2:541–53. 7. Gerard J, et al. Instrumental variable estimation of the causal effect of hunger early in life on health later in life. IFAU Institute for Evaluation of Labour Market & Education Policy 2012;6:1–44. 8. Weiss R. Impaired glucose tolerance and risk factors for progression to type 2 diabetes in youth. Pediatr Diabetes 2007;8(9):70–5. 9. Dancause KN, et al. Prenatal stress due to a natural disaster predicts insulin secretion in adolescence. Early Hum Dev 2013;89:773–6. 10. Zia A, et al. Genetic susceptibility to type 2 diabetes

51a


11. 12.

13.

14. 15.

16.

17.

and implications for therapy. J Diabetes Metab 2013;4:248–9. Guja C, et al. Genetic factors involved in the pathogenesis of type 2 diabetes. Proc Rom Acad 2012; B(1):44–61. Ravindranath R, et al. Fluctuating asymmetry in dermatoglyphics of non-insulin dependent diabetes mellitus in Bangalore-based population. Ind J Hum Genet 2005;11(3):149–53. Kobyliansky E, et al. Relationship between genetic anomalies of different levels and deviations in dermatoglyphic traits – dermatoglyphic sexual dimorphism in control healthy group of Israeli Jews. Studies in Historical Anthropology 2006; 4:61–121. Ferozkhan P, Anjali GG. Dermatoglyphics in type 2 diabetes mellitus. J Med Educ Res 2011;1(1):6–8. Pathan FKJ, Hashmi RN. Variations of dermatoglyphic features in non insulin dependent diabetes mellitus. Int J Recent Trends Sci Technol 2013; 8(1):16–9. Ojha P, Gupta G. Dermatoglyphic study: a comparison in hands of type 2 diabetes mellitus patients and normal persons of Udaipur Region. J Evolution Med Den Sci 2014;3(47):11358–68. Rakate NS, Zambare BR. Comparative study of the dermatoglyphic patterns in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients with non diabetics. Int J Med Res Health Sci 2013;2(4):955–9.

18. Trivedi PN, et al. Correlation of atd angle with non-insulin dependent diabetes mellitus in Gujarati population. J Res Med Den Sci 2014; 2(2):47–51. 19. Srivastava S, Rajasekar SS. Comparison of digital and palmar dermatoglyphic patterns in diabetic and non-diabetic individuals. IOSR J Res Med Den Sci 2014;13(7-2I):93–5. 20. Rajnigandha V, et al. Digito-palmar complex in noninsulin dependent diabetes mellitus. Turk J Med Sci 2006;36(6):353–5. 21. Sharma MK, Sharma H. Dermatoglyphics: a diagnostic tool to predict diabetes. J Clin Diagnostic Res 2012;6(3):327–32. 22. Nezhad HR, Shah NM. Application of dermatoglyphic traits for diagnosis of diabetic type 1 patients. Int J Environmental Sci Devel 2010; 1(1):36–9. 23. Shield JPH, et al. Dermatoglyphics, fetal growth, and insulin dependent diabetes in children under 5 years. Arch Dis Child 1995;72:159–60. 24. Eberechi DU, et al. A comparative study of the digital pattern, position of triradii, b-c and a-d palmar distances of diabetic subjects and essential hypertensive individuals in River State. Int J Adv Biotechnol Res 2012;3(2):615–20. 25. Rathva A, et al. A study of dermatoglyphic pattern in coronary artery disease patients. Int J Res Med 2013;2(2):5–11.
