Indian Heart Journal 6403 (2012) 261–262
Contents lists available at SciVerse ScienceDirect
Indian Heart Journal
Editorial
Diagnostic accuracy of coronary computed tomography angiography in patients post-coronary artery bypass grafting James K. Min*, Minisha Kochar Associate Professor of Medicine, Imaging, and Biomedical Sciences, Cedars-Sinai Heart Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Centre, Los Angeles, CA .
Coronary artery disease (CAD) is the leading cause of mortality in this world with a rate expected to double by the year 2020.1 Of those diagnosed with CAD, approximately 800,000 patients worldwide undergo bypass surgery every year due to advanced coronary disease and the presence of medical comorbidities.2 At 10-years after surgery, 50% of vein grafts and 10% of internal mammary grafts are occluded.3 As the prevalence of CAD is increasing worldwide, the number of patients who will be receiving bypass surgery will likely increase as well. Thus, the need for the accurate diagnosis and quantification of disease in bypass grafts as well as native vessels in coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) patients will continue to grow. Intracoronary angiography (ICA) remains the definitive diagnostic test for the diagnosis and quantification of bypass graft and native vessel stenoses, with non-invasive stress testing serving the role of localising perfusion defects.4 A newer, non-invasive modality being used to assess patency of vessels in CABG patients is multidetector-row computed tomography (MDCT).5 In most studies, the accuracy with which graft occlusion can be diagnosed by this method approaches 100%.6–21 The utility of MDCT in diagnosing disease in bypass grafts lies in the fact that venous grafts are typically larger than native coronary arteries (4–10 mm vs. 2–5 mm) and also subject to less cardiac motion, making them easier to visualise by computed tomography than native coronary vessels. With the newest generation of scanners, the negative predictive value (NPV) of ruling out occlusion has reached close to 100% with a sensitivity and specificity > 95%. A study of 52 patients using 16-detector MDCT demonstrated 99.4% accessibility of grafts, with a sensitivity and specificity of 100% for occlusion and 96% sensitivity and 100% specificity for detecting highgrade stenoses in patent grafts.6–21 A limitation of MDCT as the sole diagnostic test for the diagnosis of stenoses in CABG patients is that, often times, the *Corresponding author. E-mail address:
[email protected] ISSN: 0019-4832 Copyright © 2012. Cardiological Society of India. All rights reserved. doi: 10.1016/S0019-4832(12)60083-2
native coronary vessels are heavily calcified, limiting visualisation.17,22 De novo coronary disease in these native vessels may be the cause of symptoms and therefore may be underdiagnosed. In addition, the post surgical patient may present with metallic clips and surgical wires which may render portions of the vessels unevaluable. The limitations of MDCT in all patients, irrespective of CABG status also remain and include difficulty in imaging patients with arrhythmias and the risks of contrast nephropathy and radiation exposure. Intracoronary angiography as the sole diagnostic tool, however, is not a viable option. This procedure also carries the risks of contrast nephropathy and radiation exposure. In addition, the risks of arrhythmia, stroke, native vessel or graft dissection, myocardial infarction, and embolic stroke in these patients portend a morbidity and mortality within the ranges of 0–2% and 0.14–0.28%, respectively.22 In spite of the few limitations of MDCT, due to its high NPV and paucity of complications from the imaging, this modality serves as a very useful role in the evaluation of the patency of bypass grafts in CABG patients with low pre-test probability of disease and those with little calcification of the native coronary vessels.
References 1. 2.
3.
4.
Okrainec K, Banerjee D, Eisenberg M. Coronary artery disease in the developing world. Am Heart J 2004;148:7–15. Goldman S, Zadina K, Moritz T, et al. VA Cooperative Study Group #207/297/364, long-term patency of saphenous vein and left internal mammary artery grafts after coronary artery bypass surgery: results from a Department of Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004;44:2149–56. Eagle KA, Guyton RA, Davidoff R, et al. ACC/AHA 2004 guideline update for coronary artery bypass graft surgery. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004;44:e213–311. Türkvatan A, Biyikog˘lu SF, Büyükbayraktar FG, et al. Noninvasive evaluation of coronary artery bypass grafts and native coronary arteries: is 16-slice multidetector CT useful? Diagn Interv Radiol 2009;15:43–50.
262
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
J.K. Min and M. Kochar / Indian Heart Journal 6403 (2012) 261–262
Budoff M, Achenbach S, Blumenthal R. A scientific statement from the American Heart Association Committee on Cardiovascular Imaging and Intervention, Council on Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention, and Committee on Cardiac Imaging, Council on Clinical Cardiology. Circulation 2006;114:1761–91. Knez A, von Smekal A, Haberl R, et al. The value of ultrafast computerized tomography in detection of the patency of coronary bypasses [in German]. Z Kardiol 1996;85:629–34. Achenbach S, Moshage W, Ropers D, Nossen J, Bachmann K. Noninvasive, three-dimensional visualization of coronary artery bypass grafts by electron beam tomography. Am J Cardiol 1997; 79:856–61. Ha JW, Cho SY, Shim WH, et al. Noninvasive evaluation of coronary artery bypass graft patency using three-dimensional angiography obtained with contrast-enhanced electron beam CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1999;172:1055–9. Marano R, Storto ML, Maddestra N, Bonomo L. Non-invasive assessment of coronary artery bypass graft with retrospectively ECG-gated four-row multi-detector spiral computed tomography. Eur Radiol 2004;14:1353–62. Lu B, Dai RP, Zhuang N, Budoff MJ. Noninvasive assessment of coronary artery bypass graft patency and flow characteristics by electron-beam tomography. J Invasive Cardiol 2002;14: 19–24. Hoshi T, Yamauchi T, Kanauchi T, et al. Three-dimensional computed tomography angiography of coronary artery bypass graft with electron beam tomography. J Cardiol 2001;38:197–202. Engelmann MG, von Smekal A, Knez A, et al. Accuracy of spiral computed tomography for identifying arterial and venous coronary graft patency. Am J Cardiol 1997;80:569–74. Burgstahler C, Kuettner A, Kopp AF, et al. Non-invasive evaluation of coronary artery bypass grafts using multi-slice computed tomography: initial clinical experience. Int J Cardiol 2003;90: 275–80.
14. Rossi R, Chiurlia E, Ratti C, Ligabue G, Romagnoli R, Modena MG. Noninvasive assessment of coronary artery bypass graft patency by multislice computed tomography. Ital Heart J 2004;5:36–41. 15. Gurevitch J, Gaspar T, Orlov B, et al. Noninvasive evaluation of arterial grafts with newly released multidetector computed tomography. Ann Thorac Surg 2003;76:1523–7. 16. Ropers D, Ulzheimer S, Wenkel E, et al. Investigation of aortocoronary bypass grafts by multislice spiral computed tomography with electrocardiographic-gated image reconstruction. Am J Cardiol 2001;88:792–5. 17. Nieman K, Pattynama PM, Rensing BJ, Van Geuns RJ, De Feyter PJ. Evaluation of patients after coronary artery bypass surgery: CT angiographic assessment of grafts and coronary arteries. Radiology 2003;229:749–56. 18. Martuscelli E, Romagnoli A, D’Eliseo A, et al. Evaluation of venous and arterial conduit patency by 16-slice spiral computed tomography. Circulation 2004;110:3234–8. 19. Schlosser T, Konorza T, Hunold P, Kuhl H, Schmermund A, Barkhausen J. Noninvasive visualization of coronary artery bypass grafts using 16-detector row computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004;44:1224–9. 20. Anders K, Baum U, Schmid M, et al. Coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) patency: assessment with high-resolution submillimeter 16-slice multidetector-row computed tomography (MDCT) versus coronary angiography. Eur J Radiol 2006;57:336–44. 21. Raymond L, Jimmy L, Gregory K, et al. Comprehensive noninvasive evaluation of bypass grafts and native coronary arteries in patients after coronary artery bypass surgery: accuracy of 64slice multidetector computed tomography compared to invasive angiography. J Cardiovasc Med 2010;2:81–90. 22. Gobel F, Stewart W, Campeau L, et al. Safety of cornary arteriography in clinically stable patients following coronar bypass surgery. Post CABG Trial investigators. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 1998; 45:376–81.
