Differential effects of undernutrition during pregnancy on the

animal

Animal (2009), 3:2, pp 294–306 & The Animal Consortium 2008 doi:10.1017/S1751731108003558

Differential effects of undernutrition during pregnancy on the behaviour of does and their kids at parturition and on the establishment of mutual recognition A. Terrazas1,3-, V. Robledo2, N. Serafıń3, R. Soto1, H. Hernańdez4 and P. Poindron3,5 1

Secretarıá de Posgrado, Facultad de Estudios Superiores Cuautitlań, Universidad Nacional Autońoma de Me´xico, Medicina Veterinaria y Zootecnia, Edificio L8, Cubıćulo 5, Km 2.5 Carretera Cuautitlań – Teoloyucan, San Sebastian Xhala, Cuautitlań Izcalli, Edo. Me´xico, C.P. 54714, Me´xico; 2Escuela de Medicina Veterinaria y Zootecnia, Universidad Autońoma de Quere´taro, Me´xico; 3Instituto de Neurobiologıá, UNAM-UAQ, AP 1-141 Quere´taro, 76001 Quere´taro, Me´xico; 4 Universidad Autońoma Agraria Antonio Narro, Centro de Investigacioń en Reproduccioń Caprina Perife´rico Rau´l Lo´pez Sańchez y Carretera a Santa Fe y CP 27054, Torreoń, Coahuila, Me´xico; 5Laboratoire de Comportement, Neurobiologie et Adaptation, UMR 6175 INRA/CNRS/Universite´ de Tours, Haras Nationaux, 37380 Nouzilly, France

(Received 30 January 2007; Accepted 7 October 2008; First published online 19 November 2008)

We investigated whether undernutrition during the second half of pregnancy impaired the behaviour of does and their kids at parturition and early mutual recognition. Twenty-two control and 22 underfed mixed-breed, multiparous dairy goats were used, together with their respective kids (control, n 5 31: nine singles, 16 twins and six triplets; underfed, n 5 32: 11 singles, 18 twins and three triplets). Undernutrition involved limiting protein and energy intake at 70% of the nutritional requirements for maintenance and foetal growth from day 70 of pregnancy until birth. The behaviour of mothers and their two first-born kids was observed for 90 min from the birth of each kid. Maternal olfactory recognition of the kid was assessed at 4 h post partum by testing selective nursing behaviour. Non-olfactory recognition was assessed at 8 h in a two-choice test excluding olfactory cues. In kids, preference for the mother was assessed in a two-choice test at either 12 or 24 h post partum. Bodyweight of does and kids were lower in the underfed group up to 2 weeks post partum. At parturition, licking, maternal bleating frequency and latency to nursing did not differ between nutritional groups. Control kids were faster than underfed kids to stand, search for and reach the udder, but underfed kids bleated more and tended to spend more time at the udder. Both control and underfed does accepted their own kid and rejected the alien in the selectivity test at 4 h. In contrast, at 8 h post partum, only control goats showed a significant preference for their own kid in the non-olfactory recognition test. Both control and underfed kids showed a preference for their own mother at 12 and 24 h and undernutrition during pregnancy had little influence on the performance of kids. However, 12 h-old underfed kids tended to be less active than control kids and visited their own mothers less than control kids. There were no significant correlations between the behaviour of the mother or of the kid at parturition and their performance in the discrimination tests. Overall, undernutrition in the second half of pregnancy appears to be more detrimental for the behaviour of the mother than for the kid. Furthermore, it has more impact on the establishment of maternal non-olfactory recognition than on maternal care at parturition or the establishment of maternal selectivity. Keywords: bonding, kid vigour, maternal behaviour, non-olfactory recognition, selective nursing

Introduction Pregnancy and lactation are two important periods in the reproductive cycle during the life of any mammalian species and they are also the most expensive processes in terms of nutrient requirements (Wade and Schneider, 1992). For example, in farmed ruminants, nutritional deficit during gestation may produce a delay in maturation of the foetus, -

E-mail: [email protected]

294

low milk production and loss in live weight in the mother (Robinson et al., 1999). In addition to these negative physiological effects, undernutrition during pregnancy can also affect early mother–young relationships. In sheep, desertions of twin lambs were increased in Merino ewes experiencing low nutrition in the last 6 weeks of gestation compared to well-fed ewes (Putu et al., 1988). Undernourished ewes took longer to initiate nursing and attach to their lamb than well-fed ewes (Dwyer et al., 2003). In deer, underfed mothers were more likely to ignore, avoid and be

Mother–young recognition in underfed goats aggressive to their young than well-fed mothers (Langenau and Lerg, 1976). Furthermore, besides its effects on maternal care of the young, undernutrition seems also to impair the behaviour of the neonate. Thus, undernourished ewes have been reported to give birth to lambs of poor vigour (Thomson and Thomson, 1949; Moore et al., 1986 cited by Dwyer et al., 2003). Low birth weight impairs the behaviour of the newborn lamb and undernutrition during pregnancy can exacerbate this problem (Dwyer et al., 2003). As a whole, it seems therefore possible that undernutrition during pregnancy will have negative consequences on the behavioural performances of the young as well as of the mother, including the establishment of the mother–young bond in the immediate post-partum period. One aspect of mother–young bonding that may be important for successful rearing of the young in ruminants is the establishment of recognition between the mother and her neonate. This is well recognized in sheep (Nowak et al., 2000). However, the possible impact of undernutrition during pregnancy on this specific aspect of bonding remains largely unknown. Therefore, the main aim of the present study was to investigate whether undernutrition alters the early ability of the mother and her neonate to recognize each other in the goat, in which the characteristics and mechanisms of bonding and mother–young recognition are similar to those encountered in sheep (reviewed in Poindron et al., 2007a and 2007c). Relying on the literature in sheep, we hypothesized that undernutrition during pregnancy would impair the behaviour of the mother and of the kid at parturition and the ability of does and their kids to show a preference for each other. To verify this, we studied the post-partum behaviour of does and their kids that had either received adequate nutrition during pregnancy or had been fed 70% of their nutritional requirements during the second half of pregnancy. We compared their behaviour in the 90 min following parturition, as well as their ability post partum to discriminate between their kin (own kid or doe) and an alien equivalent goat. Sheep and goat possess two systems of recognition of their neonate. At very short range (,0.25 m in ewes, Alexander, 1978; ,1 m in goats, Poindron et al., 2003), recognition depends primarily on olfactory cues (Le´vy et al., 1996; Kendrick et al., 1997) and it controls the selective access of their own young to the udder (Le´vy et al., 2004). At greater distances recognition depends on visual and acoustic cues (Alexander and Shillito, 1977; Alexander, 1978; Poindron et al., 2003; Se`be et al., 2007). As these two systems are independent (Poindron et al., 2007a and 2007c), they were both taken into account to assess maternal recognition in the present study. Therefore a test of maternal selectivity at nursing was carried out at 4 h post partum and a two-choice test of non-olfactory discrimination was performed at 8 h post partum. In kids, however, only a two-choice preference test was carried out at either 12 or 24 h after birth. The time of these various tests was determined according to the previously reported abilities of

mothers and kids to discriminate between their own and an alien kid or mother in these experimental situations (Romeyer and Poindron, 1992; Poindron et al., 2003 and 2007c; Terrazas et al., 2003). To assess the ability of does to recognize their kids, mothers underwent a test of selective nursing for olfactory discrimination (Hernandez et al., 2004) at 4 h post partum and a two-choice test of discrimination excluding olfactory cues (Poindron et al., 2003) at 8 h post partum. These two separate tests were carried out to take into account the fact that like sheep, goats use two separate systems of discrimination, depending on the distance at which recognition operates. Kids, on the other hand, underwent only a two-choice discrimination test involving all sensory cues (Poindron et al., 2007b), as there is no evidence to suggest that there are two separate systems of recognition as in the dams. This test was performed at either 12 or 24 h of age, as preference for the mother is already established at these times (Poindron et al., 2007b). Material and methods

General conditions of study Subjects. The study was spread over two consecutive years, with different animals each year. Forty-four multiparous crossbred goats from the Neurobiology Institute (UNAM) and their kids were studied. Animals were kept permanently under intensive management conditions in two 15 3 7 m2 pens at a density of about 5 m2 per animal, half of each pen being covered with a roof for sun and rain protection. Animals were fed lucerne hay, grains and minerals according to the physiological requirements of their reproductive state, until the beginning of the experimental treatment and had ad libitum access to water throughout. Oestrus was synchronized with vaginal sponges impregnated with fluorogestone acetate (Intervet, Mexico City, Mexico), followed by an intramuscular (i.m.) injection of 300 IU of eCG (Folligon) at sponge withdrawal and introduction of bucks at the same time. Experimental groups. Pregnancy and litter size were determined by ultrasound 8 weeks after mating, after which goats were immediately allocated to either the control (n 5 22) or the underfed group (n 5 22), balancing groups for litter size according to the results of ultrasound diagnosis. In the control group, the females were fed 100% of their nutritional requirements according to their bodyweight, stage of pregnancy and litter size (National Research Council (NRC), 1981). In this group, the composition of the diet was as follows: 43.16% of chaffed maize straw, 33% of worn-out flour maize, 19.8% alfalfa hay, 2.2% of soybean meal and 1.9% of minerals. This represented 2.083 Mcal/kg with 11.2% crude protein. In the underfed group, the females received the same type and amount of food as the control group until week 11 of gestation, after which energy and protein were limited to 70% of requirements until parturition. To achieve this, the diet was modified as follows: 25% alfalfa hay, 73% chaffed 295

Terrazas, Robledo, Serafıń, Soto, Hernańdez and Poindron maize straw, 2% minerals and free access to water, resulting in a diet of 1.72 Mcal/kg with 7.2% crude protein. Therefore, underfed goats received the same quantity of dry matter as control goats, but the nutritive value of the food was 30% lower. From parturition onwards, all animals in both nutritional groups were fed according to the full requirements of their reproductive state.

Bodyweight of goats and kids. Since animals were managed in groups, including feeding, it was not possible to monitor their individual intake. Nonetheless, the overall consumption was monitored daily in each group. Leftover feed was weighed each day and the quantity of food distributed the next day was adjusted accordingly, ensuring that underfed goats always received on a given day 5% more than what they had consumed the previous day. This meant that they always had sufficient amounts to ingest. Therefore, from the first to the last week of feed restriction, underfed goats consumed 99%, 77.5%, 75%, 70%, 69%, 67.5%, 67.5%, 67.5%, 65% and 56% of the energy they would normally have required if not restricted (i.e. 71% in average over the 10 weeks of undernutrition), taking into consideration their weight in each given week. Finally, we monitored the bodyweight of the goats by weighing the animals every 2 weeks from week 11 of gestation until parturition, and again at 15 and 30 days post partum, to verify whether the feeding regimens actually resulted in differences of nutrition level between nutritional groups. Also, kids were weighed at birth, 15 and 30 days after birth. Observations and testing procedures Due to the high number of parturitions over short periods of time and limitation of manpower, it was not possible to carry out the observations at parturition and the tests of recognition in all mothers and kids. Thirty-one mothers (14 control and 17 underfed) and their 44 kids were observed at parturition; 26 of these mothers were also tested for recognition of the kid at 8 h while their kids were tested for recognition of the mother at 12 or 24 h. For two additional mothers observed at parturition, kids were also tested for recognition, while the three remaining mothers were only observed at parturition. Finally, 13 mothers could not be observed at parturition and were only tested for recognition of the kid at 8 h and their kids tested at either 12 or 24 h for recognition of the mother. Thus, 20 control and 19 underfed mothers were tested for recognition of their kid at 8 h post partum, while 30 control kids and 28 underfed kids were tested for recognition either at 12 h (control 5 14 and underfed 5 11) or at 24 h (control 5 16 and underfed 5 17). Observations at parturition. When parturition was imminent (frequent abdominal contractions, rupture of water bag or hooves of kid visible), the doe was placed in a 2 3 2 m2 pen made of openwork steel panels, so that animals were not isolated from the rest of the flock. Starting at parturition, the behaviour of the doe and her 296

kid(s) was recorded with a Sony V-8 camcorder placed on a tripod outside the pen, with an observer making sure that the framing of the subjects would allow later analysis in the laboratory. In the case of a single birth, the recording lasted 90 min; in the case of twin births, the recording ended 90 min after the birth of the second kid (control: single births 5 7, twin births 5 12; underfed: single births 5 9, twin birth 5 16). The video-recordings were analysed later in the laboratory, using the program Observer Video-Pro, version 4.0 (Noldus, The Netherlands). Not only the behaviour of the mother towards the two first-born kids but also the behaviour of these two kids were analysed. The individual behaviours taken into account were as follows: (a) Mothers (1) Latency to start licking the kid and total duration of licking (s). (2) Frequency of emission of low- and of high-pitched bleats. (3) Latency of acceptance of the kid at the udder for more than 5 s without interruption by the mother or the kid and total time (s) spent nursing the kid (sum of all nursing bouts .5 s). (b) Kids (1) Frequency of emission of low- and high-pitched bleats. (2) Latency to try to stand up (behaviourally try to stand up means when the newborn begins to synchronize movements specially in hinder regions in order to stand up). (3) Latency to stand up for more than 5 s. (4) Latency to start nosing the body of the mother, which signifies udder-seeking behaviour (Alexander and Williams, 1966). (5) Latency in seconds to reach the udder from birth and total time spent with the head engaged in the inguinal region (s). In addition, indices of maternal behaviour and of kid activity were computed to obtain an overall assessment of the behaviour of the does and their kid(s) during the first 90 min following birth of the kids. The index of maternal behaviour (IMB) towards a kid consisted of the sum of the standardized values obtained for the following individual variables during the 90 min of observation of that kid: IMB 5 total duration of licking 1 total number of bleats emitted by the mother 1 total duration of nursing. For the kids, the index of kid behaviour (IKB) consisted in the sum of the standardized values of the following variables: IKB 5 total time spent at the udder 1 total number of bleats emitted by the kid 2 latency to start nosing the body of the mother 2 latency to stand up 2 latency between standing up and reaching the udder. For latencies, standardization resulted in the most negative values for the shortest latencies, which were indicative of higher kid activity. Therefore, values of latencies were subtracted so that negative values would contribute positively to the index.

Mother–young recognition in underfed goats

Tests of discrimination in does and in kids (a) Maternal selectivity at the udder at 4 h. Four hours after parturition, a test of selective acceptance of the kid at the udder was performed in this pen in 18 control and 21 underfed does. All kids were removed from the pen and the dam was submitted to two successive 5-min tests with either the first-born or the second-born kid and an alien kid of similar age and physical aspect. The order of presentation of their own and the alien kid was randomized across goats within each experimental group. The following behavioural parameters were measured: (a) number of low-pitched bleats emitted by the goat, (b) number of acceptances at the udder, (c) duration of suckling, (d) number of refusals at the udder, (e) number of head butts at or biting of the kid and (f) number of high-pitched (protest) bleats. The first three parameters are indicative of acceptance of the kid and the last three of rejection. The overall effect of nutrition was studied by comparing these behavioural variables between control and underfed does. For individual classification of the does, a mother was classified as non-selective if she nursed the alien kid for more than 5 s without interruption and without displaying any aggressive behaviour towards it during the whole test. A doe was classified as ambivalent if she nursed the alien kid for more than five consecutive seconds but also showed aggressive behaviour towards the kid during the test. In all other instances does were classified as selective. At the end of the test, goats and their kids were transferred in a larger pen (8 3 11 m2) together with other mothers and kids, to allow some degree of mother–young separation and interactions with other animals. (b) Two-choice test of maternal preference for their own kid in the absence of olfactory cues at 8 h post partum. Goats were submitted to a test of choice between their own and an alien kid of the same age at 8 h post partum (20 control and 19 underfed), in which choice relied only on visual and acoustic cues (Poindron et al., 2003). Goats were tested only once to avoid possible habituation to the test (Lindsay and Fletcher, 1968). Testing conditions were the same as those described in the study of Poindron et al. (2003). Briefly, the testing area was a 10 m 3 10 m 3 10 m triangular enclosure, delimited by 1-m high, solid-metal barriers (Figure 1). The testing area was divided into three main zones: two 1-m wide zones of contact in front of the two pens for the kids and a neutral zone. Alien kids were matched for size and age to the goat’s own kids. The goat was put into the starting pen and released after 30 s, giving her the opportunity to see and hear both kids before being released. In all cases, both kids had bleated before the goat was released. Two experimenters recorded the following parameters over 5 min: (1) latency to reach a contact zone; (2) identity of the first kid reached;

10 m 5a

5b

4

4

3a

3b

2 10 m

1

Figure 1 Testing pen used in goats to test the non-olfactory recognition of kids by their mother: 1 – waiting area for the doe; 2 – neutral zone; 3a and 3b – zones of contact near each kid; 4 – zone inaccessible to the animals, thus preventing perception of individual olfactory cues and 5a and 5b – holding pens for the kids.

(3) total time spent in the contact zone near each kid; (4) number of maternal visits to the contact zone; (5) total time spent looking towards each kid regardless of the position of the goat in the testing area. Looking towards was defined as the rear-front axis of the goat’s head being directly oriented towards a kid. (c) Two-choice test of preference of kids for their mother at 12 or 24 h post partum. Two separate groups of kids born from control and underfed goats were tested either at 12 h (control n 5 14: five single, nine twins; underfed n 5 10: three single, seven twins) or at 24 h after birth (control n 5 16: four single, six twins and six triplets; underfed n 5 17: seven singles, eight twins and two triplets). This time of test was selected because it had been shown in a previous study that in our experimental conditions, kids were able to show a preference for their mother at 12 h of age (Poindron et al., 2007b). The tests were carried out in a roofed building adjacent to the pens holding the groups of pregnant and postparturient animals. The testing area consisted of a 4 m 3 4 m enclosure delimited by 1-m high, solid-metal barriers (Figure 2). This area itself was divided in one section of 4 m 3 3 m for the kids and two 2 m 3 1 m sections to hold the mothers. These three sections were delimited by openwork panels separating the does from each other and from the kid, so that the kid could see, hear and smell the does and get in nasal contact with them, but the kid could not suckle and the does could not pass their head through the panels. A 0.5-m-wide zone of contact was defined in front of each pen holding a mother. The two stimulus goats used in one test had given birth at about the same time and were coming from the same group (control or underfed). The kid to be tested was placed in the middle of the testing 297

Terrazas, Robledo, Serafıń, Soto, Hernańdez and Poindron 2 meters

Goat on the left 3a

Goat on the right 3b

2a

2b

1 meter

0.5 meter

2.5 meter 1

Figure 2 Testing pen used in kids to test the recognition of mother goats by their kid: 1 – neutral zone; 2a and 2b – zones of contact with each mother and 3a and 3b – holding pens for the mothers.

area, 1.5 m away from the contact zone. The test started as soon as the kid was placed in the testing area. The tested subjects could not see other animals, apart from the two mothers they were tested with, but acoustic isolation from the rest of the flock was not possible. For the test, all kids belonging to the two mothers involved were removed except the one to be tested. These unused kids were kept in a pen in another building and out of the mothers’ sight and earshot. The two mothers were placed in their holding pen and the kid to be tested could not see in which pen its dam was placed. The side of the pen (right or left) where the own mother stood was alternated between tests, so that half of the animals were tested with their mother on the right and half with their mother on the left. During the test, which lasted 5 min, the following variables were recorded on a preformatted sheet: (1) Latency to reach a mother: time (s) taken by the kid to reach a contact zone. (2) Identity of mother (own or alien) that the kid reached first. (3) Time spent in each contact zone (s). (4) Number of kid’s visits to each contact zone. Indices of maternal preference for each kid and of kid preference for each mother were computed on the same principle as for behavioural indices at parturition. The index of maternal preference for a kid was computed in the following manner. First, each variable to be included in the index was standardized, with the values for the doe’s own kids and for the alien kids included in a single standardization process. Then the index was computed for each kid by summing the standardized values of Time spent close to the doe 1 number of visits in the contact zone for the does 1 first choice (initially coded as 0 for no choice, 1 for wrong choice and 2 for correct choice). The procedure was the same for the index of kid preference for each mother, using the same behaviours towards each mother, except for Time looking towards each mother, which was not measured in kids. 298

Statistical analyses Statistical analyses of individual behavioural parameters were carried out by nonparametric tests (two tailed) because of the lack of normality of the data. Intragroup comparisons (behaviour towards the two stimulus subjects) were performed with the Wilcoxon signed-ranks test. Comparisons between the control and the underfed groups were performed with the Mann–Whitney U-test. The proportions of kids or goats that reached their own mother or their own kid first were compared between the two groups by a Fisher exact probability test. Live weights of mothers and kids at parturition were analysed by Student’s t-test, and the general effect of treatment over time was tested using an ANOVA for repeated measures followed by the Tukey procedure for post hoc comparisons. All tests were performed with the statistical package Systat, version 10.0 (Evanston, IL, USA). Exact values of P are indicated in the test and the level of statistical significance was set at P < 0.05. Results for individual behavioural data are presented in terms of medians and quartiles. Results of nonbehavioural data are presented in terms of their means and s.e. Finally, as behavioural indices followed a normal distribution, they were analysed using parametric statistical tests, including Pearson correlations with Bonferroni corrections to investigate the relations between indices, and the results are presented as means and s.e. Ethics This work was carried out according to the local ethic protocol and according to the guidelines for the ethical use of animals in applied ethological studies (Sherwin et al., 2003). Results

Bodyweight of goats and kids Goats. In the goats, there was an effect of time and of nutritional group on bodyweight, as well as an interaction between time and nutritional group (ANOVA; P , 0.05). Mean bodyweight did not differ significantly between control and underfed goats until week 13 of pregnancy (t-test, P . 0.05). In contrast, at weeks 15 and 17 of pregnancy, at parturition and until the second week after birth, control females were significantly heavier than underfed females (t-test, P , 0.05; Figure 3). Kids. Control kids were significantly heavier than underfed kids at birth (3.19 6 0.22 v. 2.43 6 0.14 kg, t-test, P , 0.001). In addition, bodyweight of kids was affected by time and nutritional group, with a significant interaction between these two factors. Control kids were still heavier at 15 days of age than underfed kids (6.93 6 0.45 v. 5.34 6 0.41 kg, t-test, P 5 0.001) and also at 30 days (9.12 6 0.61 v. 7.33 6 0.61 kg, t-test, P 5 0.05). Behaviour at parturition Behaviour of the mother. When considering the behaviour of the mothers towards their first-born kid (singles and

Mother–young recognition in underfed goats first-born twins), the latency of onset and duration of licking over the 90 min of observation did not differ significantly between control and underfed goats (P > 0.11; Table 1), while mothers of singles licked their kid longer than mothers of twins (Mann–Whitney U-test, P 5 0.018). In contrast, when considering the behaviour of mothers towards their second-born kid, control does licked their kid significantly longer than underfed mothers (Mann–Whitney U-test, P 5 0.022). Bleating activity (low-pitched, highpitched or total bleats) did not differ significantly between control and underfed goats, regardless of whether maternal bleating activity concerned the period of observation for the first-born kid, or the period for the second-born kid in twins. The latency to nurse a kid did not differ significantly between control and underfed goats for the first- or the second-born kid, whereas underfed goats tended to nurse their first-born kid longer than controls (Mann–Whitney U-test, P 5 0.054). However, there was no global significant effect of litter size on the duration of nursing for first-born kids or of birth order for twins. The maternal behaviour index of does did not differ between the control and underfed groups, either for the first-born (20.138 6 0.548 and 0.895 6 0.542) or for the second-born kid (20.494 6 0.298 and 21.473; t-test, P > 0.17). On the other hand, independent of the nutrition group, this index was significantly higher for single kids than for first-born or second-born kids (1.100 6 0.530, 20.502 6 0.491 and 21.021 6 0.344; t-test, P 5 0.042 60

Body weight (kg)

** *

40 30 20

Control

10

Underfed

0 11

13

15

17

Birth

2

Behaviour of the kids. The latency of udder-seeking behaviour was shorter in control kids than in underfed kids (Mann–Whitney U-test, P 5 0.027; Table 2) as was the latency to stand up (Mann–Whitney U-test, P 5 0.050). The latency to reach the udder was also significantly shorter in control than in underfed kids (Mann–Whitney U-test, P 5 0.048) and was significantly shorter in first-born than in second-born twins (P 5 0.042). As a whole, the time spent by kids engaged in the inguinal region did not differ significantly between control and underfed kids or according to birth order in twins. However, single control kids spent less time engaged in the inguinal region than underfed single kids (P 5 0.026), whereas this was not the case in twins. The frequency of low-pitched bleats of kids was significantly higher in underfed kids than in control kids (P 5 0.020) and this tended to be also the case for the total number of bleats emitted by kids (P 5 0.10), whereas the difference was not significant for high-pitched bleats (P 5 0.63). In kids, the behavioural index did not differ significantly between the control and the underfed groups (0.556 6 0.551 and 20.463 6 0.699) or between singles and twins (0.996 6 0.572 and 20.690 6 0.640 ANOVA, P 5 0.19 and 0.14). Similarly there was no significant difference between first- and second-born kids in litters (20.747 6 0.947 and 20.632 6 0.900). Correlations between index of maternal behaviour, index of kid behaviour and birth weight of kids In the control group, the Pearson correlation between the indices for maternal and kid behaviour was 0.30 and those between these indices and the birth weight of the kid were 0.16 and 0.06 (P > 0.61). In the underfed group, these correlations were 0.52, 0.45 and 0.20 (P 5 0.026, 0.077 and 1.00). Considering both groups together did not result in reinforcing these correlations (r 5 0.43, 0.28 and 0.19; P 5 0.012, 0.21 and 0.67).

** *

50

and 0.005), while there was no significant difference between the first- and the second-born kids in twins.

4

Time before and after parturition (weeks)

Figure 3 Bodyweight (mean 6 s.e.) of goats during pregnancy and after parturition in control (n 5 19) and underfed groups (n 5 21). *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01.

Selective nursing behaviour at 4 h post partum At 4 h post partum, the proportions of selective mothers did not differ between the two nutritional groups (16/18 and

Table 1 Maternal behaviour of goats during the first 90 min following the birth of each their kid (s) Control group (n 5 11) First kid Latency of start of licking (s) Duration of Licking (s) Frequency of emission of low-pitched bleats Frequency of emission of high-pitched bleats Latency of acceptance of the kid at the udder (s) Total time spent nursing the kid (s)

4 1196 101 0 1647 286

(2–10) (1140–1483) (53–278) (0–1) (1247–2160) (177–424)*

Underfed group (n 5 16)

Second kid 22 1121 105 0 1619 434.5

(3–74) (985–1296)x (59–190) (0–0) (1400–2685) (334–630)

First kid 7 1549 120 0 2447 525

(3–11) (1209–1910) (62–281) (0–1) (1898–3152) (313–811)*

Second kid 44 631 89 0

(26.5–173.5) (556.5–684.5)y (58–256) (0–0) (1891–4447) 113 (8–519.5)

Goats had received either 100% (control group) or 70% (underfed group) of their nutritional requirements during the second half of pregnancy. x v. y between control and underfed goats for a given variable: P , 0.05, Mann–Whitney U-test; *P 5 0.054.

299

Terrazas, Robledo, Serafıń, Soto, Hernańdez and Poindron Table 2 Behavior of first (singles and first-born twins) and second-born (twins) kids during the first 90 min of their life Control group First kid (n 5 14)

Second kid (n 5 6)

Underfed group First kid (n 5 17)

142.5 (50–216)x 246 (153–361)b Frequency of emission of low-pitched bleats 158 (99–217)a Frequency of emission of high-pitched bleats 69 (27–213) 102.5 (46–143) 55 (27–109) Latency to try to stand up (s) 439 (258–632) 509.5 (359–607) 560 (416–651) Latency to stand up (s) 901 (819–1175)a 920 (833–1217) 1189 (775–1798)b a Latency to start nosing the body of the mother (s) 1051.5 (734–1329) 1120 (985–1758) 1458 (1040–2252)b Latency to reach the udder (s) 1213 (1019–1547)a 1426.5 (1185–2623) 1653 (1284–3048)b Total time spent with head engaged in 967 (849–1378)a 1150.5 (909–1394) 242 (1066–1843)b inguinal region

Second kid (n 5 7) 234 171 1043 1816 1593 2931 577

(142.5–339.5)y (32–186) (467.5–1221) (1008.5–2525.5) (1465.5–2471) (1414.5–2986.5) (201–1214.5)

Control group: mothers had received 100% of their nutritional requirements during the second half of pregnancy; underfed group: mothers had received 70% of their nutritional requirements during the second half of pregnancy. a v. b(first kid) and x v. y(second kid) between control and underfed goats for a given variable: P , 0.05, Mann–Whitney U-test.

Table 3 Selectivity of nursing behaviour at 4 h post partum in goats having received either 100% (control group) or 70% (underfed group) of their nutritional requirements during the second half of pregnancy Control group (n 5 18) Own kid Low-pitched bleats (f) High-pitched bleats (f) Nursing duration (s) Rejection at the udder (f) Acceptances at the udder (f) Aggressive behaviour (f)

9.5 0 90.5 0 4 0

(4–17) (0–0)a (25–190)a (0–0)a (3–7)a (0–0)a

Underfed group (n 5 21)

Alien kid 16.5 4 0 1 0 1

(5–35) (0–28)b (0–0)b (0–4)b (0–0)b (0–2)b

Own kid 7 0 95 0 3 0

(5–13)* (0–1)a (5–174)a (0–0)a (1–4)a (0–0)a

Alien kid 12 23 0 3 0 1

(1–30)* (2–80)b (0–0)b (0–5)b (0–0)b (0–4)b

Different letters between the own and the alien kid for a given variable indicate a significant difference of behaviour for that variable between the two kids (Wilcoxon test, P , 0.05). *P 5 0.059. There were no significant differences between the two nutritional groups (Mann–Whitney U-test, P . 0.05). Duration of test: 5 min for each kid, which were presented successively.

20/21, Fisher exact P 5 0.59). Only one control and one underfed doe nursed the alien kid for 6 and 12 s (v. 215 and 238 s for their own kid) without showing any aggressive behaviour. One additional control mother nursed the alien kid for 11 s (v. 25 s for her own kid), but displayed aggressive behaviour towards it, while all other control and underfed goats were selective, nursing their own kid while the alien was rejected with aggressive behaviour or the emission of numerous high-pitched bleats. No significant differences were found for any of the behaviours recorded in this test between the underfed and the control groups (Mann–Whitney U-test, P > 0.15; Table 3). All behaviours indicative of rejection were significantly higher for the alien kid than for the own kid in both nutritional groups (Wilcoxon test, P < 0.004), with the exception of the lowpitched bleats. These did not differ between own and alien lambs in the control group (P 5 0.36) but tended to be higher with the alien kid than with the own kid in the underfed group (P 5 0.059). When both nutritional groups were considered together, mothers emitted significantly more low-pitched bleats with the alien kid than with their own kid (14 [4.5–33] v. 7 [4–14.5]; Wilcoxon test, P 5 0.039), as in the case of high-pitched bleats (Table 1). 300

Two-choice test of maternal preference for the own kid at 8 h post partum Initial behaviour of does. Underfed mothers took longer to reach a contact zone compared to control mothers (11 s [10–17.5] v. 28 s [14–62]; P 5 0.027). The proportions of goats reaching their own kid first did not differ from a random choice (binomial test, P . 0.05) or between control and underfed groups (14/20 v. 10/19; Fisher exact P 5 0.33). Total time spent by mothers in each contact zone. Control goats spent more time near both kids than underfed goats (P 5 0.032). Control mothers also spent more time in the contact zone near their own kid than underfed mothers (P 5 0.021), but the time near the alien kid did not differ between nutritional groups (P 5 0.37). Also, control goats spent more time near their own kid than near the alien kid (P 5 0.001). In contrast, in the underfed group, there was no significant difference between the time mothers spent near the own kid and near the alien kid (P 5 0.19; Figure 4). Total time spent looking towards each kid, regardless of the position of the mother in the testing area. Control goats spent more time looking towards both kids than underfed

Mother–young recognition in underfed goats Own Kid Alien Kid

Time (s)

250 200

a **

10 b

a **

8 **

150 100

6 *

b

0

4 2

50 Control Underfed Time spent close to each kid

Control

Underfed

Time spent looking toward each kid

Control

Underfed

Frequency / 5 min

12

300

0

Number of visits to each kid

Figure 4 Preference by mothers for 8-h-old kids in a two-choice test excluding olfactory cues. Goats were fed either 100% (control) or 70% (underfed) of their requirement for the second half of pregnancy. Results are shown as box plots (median and interquartile range) of the mother’s behaviours towards their own (open box) or the alien (black box) kid for left: time spent by goats in the contact zone near each kid; centre: time spent looking at their own or the alien kid; right: frequency of maternal visits to their own or the alien kid. **P < 0.01, *P < 0.05 for own v. alien kid (Wilcoxon signed-ranks test). a, b for control v. underfed goats (Mann–Whitney U-test). Duration of the test: 5 min.

goats (P 5 0.002). Control goats also spent more time looking towards their own kid than underfed goats (P 5 0.003; Figure 4), while this was not the case for the time spent looking towards the alien kid (P 5 0.28). Also, control goats spent more time looking towards their own kid than towards the alien kid (P 5 0.001), whereas this was not so in the underfed group (P 5 0.15).

Number of maternal visits to the contact zones. In both nutritional groups, mothers visited the contact zone near their own kid more frequently than near the alien kid, although the difference did not reach significance in underfed goats (control: P 5 0.005; underfed: P 5 0.053; Figure 4). Level of nutrition of the doe did not affect the number of maternal visits near the own kid, near the alien kid or the total number of visits near both kids (P > 0.41). Indices of preference for each kid. The preference index of control mothers for their own kid was significantly higher than in underfed mothers (control: 2.770 6 0.688, underfed: 0.170 6 0.652, P 5 0.004) while the preference index for the alien kid did not differ significantly between the two groups (control: 21.668 6 0.503, underfed: 20.990 6 0.424, P 5 0.31). The control does showed a higher preference for their own kid compared to the alien kid (P , 0.001), whereas the underfed does showed no difference in preference index between their own and the alien kid (P 5 0.42). Both nutrition of the doe (P 5 0.006) and identity of the kid (P 5 0.001) had an impact on the preference index and there was also an interaction between these factors (P 5 0.016). Two-choice test of preference for the mother in 12-h-old kids Initial behaviour of kids. The latency to reach a mother did not differ between control and underfed kids (67.5 s [32–218] v. 147.5 s [60–238], P 5 0.29). All the kids of the

control group reach a mother, while two kids of the underfed group did not reach a mother. For the kids that reached a mother, the proportions of kids reaching their own mother first did not differ significantly between groups (control kids: 11/14; underfed kids: 6/8; Fisher exact probability P 5 1) or from a random choice in each nutritional group taken separately (binomial test, control: P 5 0.057; underfed: P 5 0.29) but did so when considering both groups together (17/22; P 5 0.017).

Time spent in each contact zone (Figure 5). For those kids that reached a mother, the total time spent by kids near the two mothers did not differ significantly between nutritional groups (P 5 1) (Figure 5). Kids spent more time near their own mother than near the alien dam in the control group (P 5 0.002). This was also the case for kids in the underfed group, but the difference failed to reach significance (P 5 0.069). The times spent near the own mother or near the alien mother did not differ between control and underfed kids (P > 0.84). Number of visits by the kids to each contact zone (Figure 5). The total number of visits to both mothers did not differ significantly between the two groups of kids (P 5 0.15). Control kids tended to visit their own mother more frequently than underfed kids (P 5 0.063) while the number of visits to the alien mother did not differ significantly between groups (P 5 0.48). Both control and underfed kids visited their own dam more frequently than the alien mother (P < 0.041). Preference index For those kids that reached a mother at 12 h, the preference index for their own mother was higher than for the alien mother (P 5 0.001) but there was no affect of nutrition (P 5 0.37) and no interactions (P 5 0.74; control own: 1.75 6 0.48; control alien: 21.11 6 0.56; underfed own: 1.10 6 0.67; underfed alien: 21.31 6 0.60). 301

Terrazas, Robledo, Serafıń, Soto, Hernańdez and Poindron Own dam 6 300 *

5

* 4

Time (s)

200 *

150

3

100

2

50

1

0

Control

Underfed

Time spent near each doe

Control

Underfed

Frequency / 5 min

** 250

Alien dam

0

Number of visits to each doe

Figure 5 Preference of 12-h-old kids for their mother in a two-choice test involving visual, acoustic and olfactory cues. Kids were born from does that had been fed either 100% (control, Co) or 70% (underfed, UF) of their requirement for the second half of pregnancy. Results are shown as box plots (medians and interquartile ranges) of the kids’ behaviours towards their own (open box) or the alien (black box) dam for on the left: lengths of time spent in the contact zone either near each dam, on the right: frequency of visits to their own or the alien dam. **P < 0.01, *P < 0.05, for own v. alien dam (Wilcoxon signed-ranks test). a, b for control v. underfed kids (Mann–Whitney U-test). Duration of the test: 5 min.

Two-choice test of preference for the mother in 24-h-old kids Initial behaviour of kids. The latency to reach a mother did not differ significantly between control and underfed kids at 24 h (67 s [34.5–91] v. 47 s [36–144], P 5 0.82). All the kids of the control group reached a mother, while two kids of the underfed group did not reach a mother. When considering only the kids that reached a mother, the proportion of kids reaching their own mother first did not differ between groups (control: 11/16; underfed: 13/15; Fisher exact P 5 0.39) or from a random choice in each group separately (control: P 5 0.21; underfed: P 5 0.073), but did so when the two groups were considered together (24/31; P 5 0.003). Time spent in each contact zone. In kids that reached a mother, the total time spent near the two mothers did not differ significantly between groups (P 5 0.94). Similarly, the time spent by kids near their own or near the alien mother did not differ between control and underfed kids (P > 0.89). On the other hand, in both groups, kids spent more time near their own dam than near the alien dam, although the difference just failed to reach significance in the control group (control: 111 s [67.5–216] v. 8.5 s [1–105.5], P 5 0.056; underfed: 131 s [48–189] v. 27 s [1–43], P 5 0.005). Number of visits by the kids to the contact zones. The total number of visits made by the kids to the two mothers did not differ significantly between control and underfed kids (P 5 0.60). Also, the frequency of visits by the kids to their own mother or to the alien dam did not differ between the two groups (P > 0.51). Finally, in both nutritional groups kids visited their own mother more frequently than the alien one (control: 2.5 [1–3.5] v. 1 [0–2], P 5 0.02; underfed: 3 [1–3] v. 1 [0–2], P 5 0.002). Preference indices at 24 h. For kids that reached a mother at 24 h, the index of preference was significantly higher 302

for their own mother than for the alien doe in both nutritional groups (control, own: 0.994 6 0.54, control, alien: 20.798 6 0.51; underfed, own: 0.744 6 0.673; underfed, alien: 20.928 6 0.322; ANOVA, P , 0.001), while there was no significant difference between nutritional groups and no significant interaction between nutritional group and identity of the goat (P > 0.46).

Comparison of preference for the own mother in kids at 12 and 24 h Regarding individual behaviours, there were no significant differences between 12 and 24 h-old kids in any of the studied variables in the control group (Mann–Whitney U-test, P > 0.16). In the underfed group, there was only some influence of testing time on the number of visits paid by the kids to the mothers: 12 h-old kids tended to pay less visits to both mothers and paid significantly less visits to the alien mother than 24 h-old kids (P 5 0.052 and 0.031). Twelve-hour-old underfed kids also tended to pay less visits to their own mother than 24 h-old kids (P 5 0.072). When considering the indices of preference for the own and the alien dam in kids that reached a mother, there was a significant effect of time and of the identity of the doe (ANOVA for repeated measures, P 5 0.049 and 0.001), but not of nutrition (P 5 0.15): indices at 24 h were overall higher than at 12 h. There were no significant interactions between any of these factors (P > 0.29). Correlations between behaviour at parturition and behaviour in the recognition tests Mothers. There were no significant correlations between the index for maternal or kid behaviour at parturition and the index of preference for the own kid in the recognition test at 8 h, whether the two nutritional groups were considered separately (controls, n 5 12: r 5 0.26 and 20.013; underfed n 5 14: r 5 0.011 and 20.19) or together (n 5 26, r 5 20.045 and 20.024).

Mother–young recognition in underfed goats

Kids. Considering the limited number of kids that had been observed at parturition and tested for discrimination in each nutritional group at a given time, we pooled the data of the tests carried out at 12 h and at 24 h. When considering separately the control and the underfed groups (n 5 18 and 20), the correlations between the indices for the behaviour of the mother or the behaviour of the kid at parturition and the preference index of the kids during the two-choice test were 0.10 and 0.14 in the control group and 0.41 and 0.10 in the underfed group. When both nutritional groups were pooled, these correlations were 0.28 and 0.06. However, none of these values were significant (P > 0.22).

Discussion Our hypothesis that undernutrition during the second half of pregnancy would impair the display of early doe and kid behaviour, including the establishment of recognition between goats and their kid, was partly supported by our results. In parturition behavioural undernutrition impaired the behaviour of the does and also had an important impact on the behaviour of the kids. Also, undernutrition impaired the doe’s non-olfactory discrimination of the kid at 8 h post partum. At this time control goats displayed discrimination between their own and the alien kid for all considered behaviours and their different preference indices for the two types of kids reflect this. Underfed does were not as good as control does at discriminating between their own kid and the alien kid. Underfed does showed a preference for their kid only by the higher number of visits they paid to it than to the alien kid. All other behaviours did not differ significantly for their own and for the alien kid. In contrast to this effect of undernutrition at 8 h, there was no evidence of any impairment of selective acceptance of the young at the udder at 4 h post partum and very marginal effects on the display of maternal behaviour at parturition: only licking of second-born kids was reduced in underfed does. In particular, there was no evidence to suggest that maternal motivation at parturition had been affected by undernutrition, since neither the latencies to initiate licking and to nurse nor the IMB differed significantly between control and underfed does. It is unlikely that the little effect maternal undernutrition had on the behaviour of the mothers at parturition and on maternal selective behaviour could be attributed to a failure of the treatment to attain its goals. Indeed, underfed goats ingested an average 30% less energy than controls over the period of undernutrition and the level of restriction imposed induced significant differences in live weights of does as early as week 15 of pregnancy and for at least 2 weeks after restriction had ceased. Similar effects were also found for the weight of kids at birth and at 2 weeks of age. In this respect, our results are congruent with those of other studies in sheep (Russel et al., 1967 and 1977; Robinson and Aitken, 1985; Dwyer et al., 2003) and goats (Schdeva et al., 1973; Sahlu et al., 1992 and 1995) with similar

schemes of food restriction. Therefore, it follows that the level of undernutrition applied in the present study impaired more specifically the ability of the doe to develop nonolfactory recognition of her young, while having little influence on other aspects of maternal behaviour. Undernutrition during pregnancy may have impaired the display of maternal preference of the doe for their own kid at 8 h in various ways, given the multi-factorial nature of maternal care. For example, maternal motivation may have been reduced in underfed does through some effect of undernutrition on maternal physiological factors involved in the facilitation of maternal behaviour, as suggested by results in sheep (Dwyer et al., 2003). This could have in turn impaired their performances in the two-choice test since underfed mothers spent less time near and looked at the two kids less during the test and also took more time to reach a kid than control mothers. This suggests that the underfed does were less motivated to reach their young. However, there are several elements indicating that a difference of maternal motivation between the two nutritional groups is unlikely to account for the lower discrimination performances in underfed does. Instead, the extended latency of underfed does to reach a kid may be directly related to the greater difficulty they had to discriminate between the two kids. When mothers were deprived of their own kid during the selectivity test while being tested with the alien, their vocal response to the separation of their own kid did not differ between the two nutritional groups, as was also the case for the overall selectivity outcome of the test. This indicates that maternal motivation or strength of bonding was not impaired by undernutrition. Similarly, the low correlations found between the maternal behaviour index at parturition in the two groups – which depends on maternal motivation – and the indices of preference for each kid during the recognition test, do not support the hypothesis that undernutrition impaired the non-olfactory discrimination of kids through some effect on maternal motivation or through the quality of maternal or kid behaviour at parturition. Another possibility would be that the display of a preference for their own kid was impaired in underfed mothers because both kids, also from the underfed group, were less active during the test than control kids, thus rendering discrimination more difficult. Nonetheless, there is no clear evidence to support this hypothesis. While underfed kids took significantly longer to stand or to reach the udder than controls in the first 90 min of their life, they also spent more time at the udder and bleated more. Furthermore, in the test at 12 h they performed as well as control kids. On the whole it would appear that undernutrition directly affected some parameter specific to non-olfactory maternal discrimination. Further studies are warranted to identify the exact mechanisms involved in this impairment. Contrary to what was found in the mothers, undernutrition during the second half of pregnancy had only a very limited impact on the ability of kids to display a preference for their mother since both at 12 h and at 24 h, both 303

Terrazas, Robledo, Serafıń, Soto, Hernańdez and Poindron control and underfed kids did display a preference for their own dam. In particular, 12-h-old underfed kids displayed a preference for their mother despite the fact that they paid less visits to their own dam than 12-h-old controls and also paid less visits to the dams than 24-h-old underfed kids. In contrast to this lack of influence of undernutrition on the ability of kids to develop a preference for their mother, there was some indication that the locomotor behaviour of kids at birth was impaired by undernutrition of the does during pregnancy. Latencies for all motor activities (udderseeking, standing, reaching the udder) were shorter in control kids than in underfed kids. On the other hand, time spent at the udder and bleating activity were higher in underfed kids, particularly in singles, possibly indicating lower fat reserves and/or higher feeding motivation. These opposite effects may have compensated each other, resulting in underfed kids being able to recognize their mother as efficiently as controls. The ability of kids to discriminate and display a preference for their mother at 12 h of age, especially in underfed kids, is consistent with previous results obtained with the same type of goats and in the same conditions (Poindron et al., 2007b). However, our results contrast with the lack of discrimination reported before the age of 48 h in West African dwarf goats (Addae et al., 2000; Awotwi et al., 2000). Therefore it seems unlikely that undernutrition was the cause for the later display of mother recognition in the studies of Addae et al. (2000) and Awotwi et al. (2000), unless it had been very severe. Other factors, such as differences between breeds’ testing conditions and criteria used, could still account for these discrepancies. As a whole, our results are consistent with those reported in sheep, in which undernutrition impaired maternal behaviour and attachment to the lamb and significantly reduced birth weight, and have impact on early behavioural development of the young (Dwyer et al., 2003). The fact that non-olfactory preference for the kid by the doe and therefore its recognition was affected by undernutrition during pregnancy is congruent with the finding of these authors that undernutrition impaired the strength of maternal bonding. Indeed, mothers need to establish a preference for their young so that bonding can be formed. However, both in sheep and in goats, maternal bonding depends mainly on the olfactory recognition of the neonate, which establishes within less than 2 h post partum in the majority of mothers in both species (Le´vy et al., 2004; Poindron et al., 2007a). In that respect, the lack of difference in selective behaviour at 4 h between underfed and control goats may appear to contradict the effect found by Dwyer et al. (2003) on maternal bonding score. Nonetheless, as tests for selective nursing were not conducted in their study, it is difficult to conclude whether maternal selectivity at nursing was affected in their ewes or whether the bonding score they used is a measure of bonding involving elements other than maternal selectivity at nursing. Indeed, maternal behaviour scores used in sheep result from the response of the mother to a conflict including components specific of maternal 304

behaviour and bonding (those linked to reunion with the young), but involving also components linked to aspects not directly related to maternal behaviour (presence of a human: O’Connor et al., 1985; Lambe et al., 2001; EverettHincks et al., 2005). Therefore, we cannot rule out that the effect of undernutrition on maternal bonding score may have been partly due to some indirect influence on the response to the presence of humans as well as to influences on maternal bonding. The comparison of our results on maternal selectivity with those of Dwyer et al. (2003) on bonding score is also difficult because we did not carry out a test of maternal behaviour score. In the form it is used in sheep, such a score may not be well adapted in goats as they are ‘hiders’ and do not necessarily respond strongly to mother–young separation (Addae et al., 2000; Awotwi et al., 2000). The behaviour of the mother in the presence of an alien kid during the test of selectivity at nursing is certainly a good alternative for assessing maternal bonding, although the absence of conflict with a human makes it difficult to compare with the maternal behaviour score used in sheep. In any case, the fact that undernutrition affected non-olfactory discrimination at 8 h and maternal selectivity at nursing differently matches the fact that these two systems of recognition function independently from each other (Poindron et al., 2007a and 2007c). It demonstrates further the multi-factorial basis of maternal care and indicates that undernutrition can affect differentially the various factors involved in the display of maternal care, possibly in relation to the passive or active nature of the sensory cues provided by the neonate (olfactory and visual v. postural, tactile and acoustic: Pryce, 1992). Our results and those obtained in sheep by Dwyer et al. (2003) both indicate that undernutrition during pregnancy had significant effects on the birth weight of the young, but a more limited impact on their behaviour than on that of the mothers. Together, these findings may suggest that (1) the foetus is somewhat more protected from the adverse effects of nutrient limitation than the mother and (2) that the nervous system and functions of the foetus are also less affected than its overall body growth. Whether such a level of restriction may influence kid survival and production in commercial systems still needs more investigation, but undernutrition is considered as one of the potentially important factors leading to preweaning mortality of kids (Ramı´rez-Bribiesca et al., 2001; Torres-Acosta et al., 2001). Furthermore, it must be underlined that the various components of early mother–young relationships that were not impaired in the present study may have been affected with a more severe restriction of nutrition or if the does had had to forage for their food, thus expending more energy. Finally, some of our results suggested the possibility of an interaction between order of birth in litters and undernutrition (e.g. maternal licking, suckling behaviour of the kid). The limited number of animals in each class of animals, especially to study the possible relations between behaviour at parturition and performance in the two-choice test of discrimination, did not permit a full investigation of

Mother–young recognition in underfed goats these possible interactions. Nonetheless, given the importance of colostrum ingestion for filial bonding in sheep (Nowak and Poindron, 2006) and the impact of nutrition on initial colostrum production (Banchero et al., 2006), undernutrition during pregnancy is likely to have more marked consequences in multiple-bearing than in singlebearing mothers. Therefore, future studies should focus more on the effects of undernutrition and strategic feeding in multiple-bearing does, as they are the most likely to be affected in terms of both production and welfare. Acknowledgements The authors are grateful to F. Hernandez, H. Sańchez, S. Viveros, S. Cervantes and A. Olazabal for their assistance during the experiments and to R. Paulin and F. Paulin for the care of the animals. They are also grateful to Dr P. Vercoe and Ms. M. Chadwick for revision of the English in the final version and to the referees for their constructive comments. This work was supported by PAPIIT grant IN217205 - FIS B/3872-1 and CATEDRA IN2-07 and VR was supported by a CONACyT grant.

Le´vy F, Keller M and Poindron P 2004. Olfactory regulation of maternal behavior in mammals. Hormones and Behavior 46, 284–302. Lindsay DR and Fletcher IC 1968. Sensory involvement in the recognition of lambs by their dams. Animal Behaviour 16, 415–417. Moore RW, Millar CM and Lynch PR 1986. The effects of pre-natal nutrition and type of birth and rearing of lambs on vigour, temperature and weight at birth, and weight and survival at weaning. Proceeding of the New Zealand Society of Animal Production 46, 259–262. National Research Council (NRC) 1981. Nutrient requirements of goats. National Academy of Sciences, Washington, DC. Nowak R and Poindron P 2006. From birth to colostrum: early steps leading to lamb survival. Reproduction Nutrition Development 46, 431–446. Nowak R, Porter RH, Levy F, Orgeur P and Schaal B 2000. Role of mother–young interactions in the survival of offspring in domestic mammals. Reviews of Reproduction 5, 153–163. O’Connor CE, Jay NP, Nicol AM and Beatson PR 1985. Ewe maternal behaviour score and lamb survival. Proceedings of the New Zealand Society of Animal Production 45, 159–162. Poindron P, Gilling G, Hernandez H, Serafin N and Terrazas A 2003. Early recognition of newborn goat kids by their mother: I. Nonolfactory discrimination. Developmental Psychobiology 43, 82–89.

Alexander G and Williams D 1966. Teat-seeking activity in lambs during the first hours of life. Animal Behaviour 14, 166–176.

Poindron P, Levy F and Keller M 2007a. Maternal responsiveness and maternal selectivity in domestic sheep and goats: the two facets of maternal attachment. Developmental Psychobiology 49, 54–70. Poindron P, Gilling G, Hernandez H, Serafıń N and Terrazas A 2007b. Preference of 12-h-old kids for their mother goat is impaired by pre-partum-induced anosmia in the mother. Animal 1, 1328–1334. Poindron P, Terrazas A, Navarro-Montes de Oca ML, Serafıń N and Hernańdez H 2007c. Sensory and physiological determinants of maternal behavior in the goat (Capra hircus). Hormones and Behavior 52, 99–105. Pryce CR 1992. A comparative systems model of the regulation of maternal motivation in mammals. Animal Behaviour 43, 417–441. Putu IG, Poindron P and Lindsay DR 1988. A high level of nutrition during late pregnancy improves subsequent maternal behaviour of Merino ewes. Proceeding of Australian Society of Animal Production 17, 294–297. Ramı´rez-Bribiesca JE, To´rtora JL, Hernańdez LM and Huerta M 2001. Main causes of mortalities in dairy goat kids from the Mexican plateau. Small Ruminant Research 41, 77–80.

Awotwi EK, Oppong-Anane K, Addae PC and Oddoye EOK 2000. Behavioural interactions between West African dwarf nanny goats and their twin-born kids during the first 48 h post-partum. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 68, 281–291.

Robinson J and Aitken R 1985. Effects of nutrition on prenatal growth and implications for perinatal survival in lambs. In Factors affecting the survival of newborn lambs (ed. JD Alexander, JD Barker and J Slee), pp. 177–189. Commission of European Communities, Brussels.

Banchero G, Perez R, Bencini R, Lindsay DR, Milton JTB and Martin GB 2006. Endocrine and metabolic factors involved in the effect of nutrition on the production of colostrum in female sheep. Reproduction Nutrition Development 46, 1–15. Dwyer C, Lawrence A, Bishop S and Lewis M 2003. Ewe–lamb bonding behaviours at birth are affected by maternal undernutrition in pregnancy. The British Journal of Nutrition 89, 123–136.

Robinson J, Sinclair K and Mcevoy T 1999. Nutritional effects on foetal growth. Animal Science 68, 315–331.

References Addae PC, Awotwi EK, Oppong-Anane K and Oddoye EOK 2000. Behavioural interactions between West African dwarf nanny goats and their single-born kids during the first 48 h post-partum. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 67, 77–88. Alexander G 1978. Odour, and the recognition of lambs by merino ewes. Applied Animal Ethology 4, 153–158. Alexander G and Shillito EE 1977. Importance of visual clues from various body regions in maternal recognition of the young in merino sheep (Ovis aries). Applied Animal Ethology 3, 137–143.

Everett-Hincks JM, Lopez-Villalobos N, Blair HT and Stafford KJ 2005. The effect of ewe maternal behaviour score on lamb and litter survival. Livestock Production Science 93, 51–61. Hernandez H, Delgadillo JA, Serafıń N, Rodrı´guez AD and Poindron P 2004. Prepartum peripherally-induced hyposmia does not reduce postpartum anoestrus duration in nursing goats. Reproduction Nutrition Development 44, 251–259. Kendrick KM, Da Costa AP, Broad KD, Ohkura S, Guevara R, Le´vy F and Keverne EB 1997. Neural control of maternal behaviour and olfactory recognition of offspring. Brain Research Bulletin 44, 383–395. Lambe NR, Conington J, Bishop SC, Waterhouse A and Simm G 2001. A genetic analysis of maternal behaviour score in Scottish Blackface sheep. Animal Science 72, 415–425. Langenau EE and Lerg JM 1976. The effects of winter nutritional stress on maternal and neonatal behavior in penned white-tailed deer. Applied Animal Ethology 2, 207–223. Le´vy F, Kendrick K, Keverne EB, Porter RH and Romeyer A 1996. Physiological, sensory and experiential factors of parental care in sheep. Advances in the Study of Behavior 25, 385–473.

Romeyer A and Poindron P 1992. Early maternal discrimination of alien kids by post-parturient goats. Behavioural Processes 26, 103–112. Russel AJ, Doney JM and Reid RC 1967. The use of biochemical parametrics in controlling nutritional state in pregnant ewes and the effect of undernourishment. The Journal of Agricultural Science 68, 351. Russel AJ, Maxwell TJ, Sibbald AR and McDonald D 1977. Relationships between energy, intake nutritional state and lamb birth weight in grayface ewes. Journal of Agricultural Science 89, 667. Sahlu T, Fernandez CD and Totchoiba MJ 1992. Influence of dietary protein on performance of dairy goats during pregnancy. Journal of Dairy Science 75, 220–227. Sahlu T, Hart SP, Le-Trong T, Jia Z, Dawson L, Gipson T and Teh TH 1995. Influence of prepartum protein and energy concentrations for dairy goats during pregnancy and early lactation. Journal of Dairy Science 78, 378–387. Schdeva KK, Sengar OPS, Singh SN and Lindhal IL 1973. Studies on goats: I. Effect of place nutrition on the reproductive performance of does. The Journal of Agricultural Science 80, 375–379. Se`be F, Nowak R, Aubin T and Poindron P 2007. Establishment of vocal communication and discrimination between ewes and their lamb in the first two days after parturition. Developmental Psychobiology 49, 375–386. Sherwin C, Christiansen SB, Duncan IJ, Erhard H, Lay DC Jr, Mench JA, O’Connor CE and Petherick JC 2003. Guidelines for the ethical use of animals in applied ethology studies. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 81, 291–305.

305

Terrazas, Robledo, Serafıń, Soto, Hernańdez and Poindron Terrazas A, Serafin N, Hernandez H, Nowak R and Poindron P 2003. Early recognition of newborn goat kids by their mother: II. Auditory recognition and evidence of an individual acoustic signature in the neonate. Developmental Psychobiology 43, 311–320.

Torres-Acosta JF, Aguilar-Caballero A, Williams J and Ortega-Pacheco A 2001. Tasa de mortalidad verdadera por estrato de edad y causa de muerte en un rebanõ de cabras criollas en el tro´pico subhu´medo de Yucatań, Me´xico. Revista Biomedica 12, 11–17.

Thomson AM and Thomson W 1949. Lambing in relation to the diet of the pregnant ewe. The British Journal of Nutrition 2, 290–305.

Wade GN and Schneider JE 1992. Metabolic fuels and reproduction in female mammals. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews 16, 235–272.

306