Effect of sucrose on shoot regeneration in

2 downloads 0 Views 9MB Size Report
Jan 13, 2015 - Jouanin L, Vilaine F, Tourneur C, Pautot V, Muller JF, Caboche M ... on rapid in vitro regeneration for two Stevia genotypes. GJBB. 2:150–153.
Acta Physiol Plant (2015) 37:37 DOI 10.1007/s11738-015-1785-z

ORIGINAL PAPER

Effect of sucrose on shoot regeneration in Agrobacterium transformed Hypericum perforatum L. roots Branka Vinterhalter • Snezˇana Zdravkovic´-Korac´ • Nevena Mitic´ • Borut Bohanec • Dragan Vinterhalter Jelena Savic´



Received: 26 May 2014 / Revised: 13 January 2015 / Accepted: 13 January 2015 Ó Franciszek Go´rski Institute of Plant Physiology, Polish Academy of Sciences, Krako´w 2015

Abstract The aim of the present study was to investigate the effect of sucrose on shoot regeneration potential in Hypericum perforatum L. roots obtained by Agrobacterium rhizogenes transformation. The morphological evaluation of transgenic roots grown on media supplemented with sucrose (0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6 and 8 %) indicated that both genotype and sucrose concentration significantly affected root elongation and branching, as well as shoot regeneration. For two of five analyzed clones, lower sucrose concentrations (up to 2 %) led to intensive shoot regeneration, while the other three clones intensified shoot development only at elevated sucrose concentrations (4 %). For all clones, concentrations above 4 % had a deleterious effect on both root and shoot development. Genetic characterization of regenerated shoots revealed that all tested clones were diploid with an average of 0.670 ± 0.002 pg of DNA per nucleus, with no significant differences between transgenic and non-transformed plants and, according to PCR, with integrated A. rhizogenes rolA, -B, -C and -D genes. Real-time RT-PCR confirmed the expression of rolA, -B and -C, while expression of the rolD gene was not detected. Differences were detected in the absolute amounts of transcripts between analyzed clones, with the highest levels of expression for all

Communicated by M. Lambardi. B. Vinterhalter  S. Zdravkovic´-Korac´  N. Mitic´  D. Vinterhalter  J. Savic´ (&) Institute for Biological Research ‘‘Sinisˇa Stankovic´’’, University of Belgrade, Bulevar Despota Stefana 142, 11060 Belgrade, Serbia e-mail: [email protected] B. Bohanec Biotechnical Faculty, University of Ljubljana, Jamnikarjeva 101, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia

three analyzed rol genes in a clone previously defined as having high root differentiation and less effective shoot regeneration potential. The observed variations in morphogenesis potential could be attributed to different levels of expression of integrated rolA, -B and -C genes; while sucrose additionally pointed out these trends. Keywords Hypericum perforatum  In vitro  Shoot regeneration  Sucrose  Agrobacterium rhizogenes  rol genes

Introduction Hypericum perforatum L. (St. John’s wort) is an herbaceous perennial plant with five-petalled bright yellow flowers that has for centuries been utilized in traditional medicine for the treatment of wounds, neurological disorders and depression (Nathan 2001). A wide range of biologically active secondary metabolites, belonging to different chemical groups, are produced in several types of secretory structures, such as multicellular dark or translucent glands and secretory canals present on leaves, stems, flower petals and stamens (Zobayed et al. 2006; Ciccarelli et al. 2001). Hypericins and hyperforins are considered the main contributors to the anticancer, antidepressive and antimicrobial activities of Hypericum herbal extracts (Kubin et al. 2005; Beerhues 2006; Fiebich et al. 2011), and a broad spectrum of flavonoids and phenolic acids contributes to its potent antioxidant activity (Butterweck 2003; Silva et al. 2005). Cultivated for medical purposes, the plants require approximately 2 years to mature; unfortunately, breeding for increased secondary metabolite accumulation sometimes leads to a loss of biological activity (McCoy and Camper 2002). Also, commercial Hypericum preparations

123

37

Page 2 of 12

show inconsistency in their contents of bioactive compounds as a result of different field environments (Southwell and Campbell 1991; Bu¨ter et al. 1998; C¸irak et al. 2014). Consequently, natural populations are still highly exploited and endangered by human harvesting. The use of in vitro culture systems is an alternative strategy for the production of satisfactory amounts of plant material, as well as to obtain less variable preparations (Bourgaud et al. 2001; Zhou and Wu 2006; Karuppusamy 2009). Large-scale production of adventitious roots and secondary metabolites in bioreactors has recently been employed (Cui et al. 2010; Wu et al. 2014). In addition, genetic transformation by Agrobacterium rhizogenes results in hairy roots that can be subsequently propagated in vitro in growth regulator-free medium at low cost. Moreover, it has been reported that plants regenerated from transformed roots can produce secondary metabolites in greater quantities than untransformed ones (Chaudhuri et al. 2006; Gangopadhyay et al. 2010; Majumdar et al. 2011). Because of these convenient aspects, efficient A. rhizogenes-mediated transformation protocols have been established in many medicinal plants (reviewed by Roychowdhury et al. 2013), including H. perforatum (Di Guardo et al. 2003; Vinterhalter et al. 2006; Bertoli et al. 2008; Koperda´kova´ et al. 2009, 2011). In a previous report, transgenic hairy roots were successfully induced by inoculating in vitro-grown shoots of H. perforatum with A. rhizogenes agropine-type strain A4M70GUS (Vinterhalter et al. 2006). Spontaneous direct bud regeneration was achieved by culturing transformed roots on hormone-free medium. Since the main biologically active compounds of H. perforatum, hypericins and hyperforins, are predominantly found in the aerial parts of the plant (Karppinen and Hohtola 2008), improvement of shoot regeneration from established transgenic hairy root cultures and their growth was an objective of the present study. A preliminary experiment showed that sucrose significantly affected the shoot regeneration potential of H. perforatum hairy root clone 14 (Vinterhalter et al. 2006); thus, we focused further on the effects of sucrose on the shoot morphogenesis potential of transgenic hairy root clones and enhanced production of the aerial parts of plants. Molecular characterization of tested clones was also performed to provide further understanding of the processes involved in morphogenesis in transgenic H. perforatum.

Acta Physiol Plant (2015) 37:37

from the local (border area around Belgrade, Serbia) H. perforatum plant population, with Agrobacterium rhizogenes strain A4M70GUS (Vinterhalter et al. 2006). A4M70GUS carries the non-disarmed plasmid pRiA4 in which the uidA sequence (coding for the b-glucuronidase enzyme, GUS), under the 70S promoter (enhancer-doubled 35S CaMV promoter) and followed by nos polyadenylation sequence, was integrated between the rolC and rolD genes in the TL-DNA (Tepfer and Casse-Delbart 1987). The presence of the uidA gene was previously detected by PCR in clones 2, 14, 15, 27 and 29, obtained from individual transformation events (Vinterhalter et al. 2006). Root explants of all above mentioned clones were cultured in ˇ acˇak, Serbia) containing Petri plates (Ø 90 mm; Spektar, C 25 ml of basal medium (BM) with WPM macrosalts (Woody Plant Medium; Lloyd and McCown 1981), MS microsalts and vitamins (Murashige and Skoog 1962), 100 mg l-1 myo-inositol and 0.64 % (w/v) agar (Torlak Institute of Virology, Vaccines and Sera, Belgrade, Serbia). The pH of all media was adjusted to 5.8 before autoclaving at 114 °C and 80 kPa for 25 min. The cultures were maintained at 25 ± 2 °C, under cool white fluorescent light with a photosynthetic photon flux density of 55 lmol m-2 s-1 and 16-h light/8-h dark photoperiod. In vitro evaluation of hairy root regeneration potential Morphological measurements were done on 35-day-old roots grown on BM supplemented with varied concentrations of sucrose (0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6 and 8 %). Each treatment consisted of three to six Petri plates with ten root apical explants, each 15 mm long. The final length of the root explants, the number of lateral roots and regenerated shoots per root explant were scored. The effects of different sucrose concentrations and the genotype on the regeneration potential of transgenic roots were evaluated using standard two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). Data were subjected to square root transformation and percentage data to angular transformation prior to statistical analysis and inversely transformed for presentation. Differences between the corresponding means were separated using Fisher’s LSD test at P B 0.05. Statistical analyses were performed using SAS software (SAS Institute, 2002; SAS/STAT, ver. 9.00. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA). PCR

Materials and methods Hairy root cultures and growth conditions Hairy root clones used in this study were obtained by transformation of plants grown in vitro, initially established

123

For PCR analysis, genomic DNA from 5-week-old in vitrogrown transformed and non-transformed control plants was isolated according to the method of Zhou et al. (1994). The pairs of primers used for amplification of the rolA, -B, -C and -D genes from the TL-DNA region are shown in Table 1.

Acta Physiol Plant (2015) 37:37

PCR reactions were set up using GeneAmpÒ Gold PCR Reagent Kit (Applied Biosystems Co., Foster City, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. All reactions were carried out for 36 cycles of denaturation at 95 °C for 1 min, primer annealing at 60 °C for 1 min and extension at 72 °C for 1 min, after initial denaturation at 95 °C for 5 min. The PCR products were separated on a 1.2 % agarose gel and visualized under UV light after ethidium bromide staining. Real-time RT-PCR Total RNA was extracted from 5-week-old shoots spontaneously regenerated on transgenic hairy roots and grown in vitro on BM with 2 % sucrose. Extraction was performed according to the method of Gasic et al. (2004), including treatment with DNAseI (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). Reverse transcription was performed on 1 lg of total RNA, using the GeneAmpÒ Gold RNA PCR Core Kit (Applied Biosystems Co.) with oligo-dT primers, according to the manufacturer’s instructions. cDNA corresponding to 200 ng of RNA was used for setting up the real-time PCR reactions using MaximaTM SYBR Green/ROX Master Mix (Thermo Scientific) and an ABI PRISM 7000 Sequence Detection System (Applied Biosystems Co.). To amplify the rolA, -B, -C and -D genes, the specific primers shown in Table 1 were used. PCR reaction conditions included initial denaturation (95 °C for 5 min), followed by 40 cycles of denaturation at 95 °C for 30 s, annealing at 60 °C for 30 s and extension at 72 °C for 30 s. Additional melting curve analyses were performed by cooling the reactions to 60 °C and then increasing the temperature to 95 °C with a slope of 0.1 °C s-1, while measuring the fluorescence continuously. Constitutively expressed glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase gene (GAPDH, GenBank accession No. GU014528) served as the internal reference gene (Table 1). All reactions were carried out in triplicate and repeated twice. The results

Page 3 of 12

37

were analyzed using 7000 System SDS Software (Applied Biosystems Co.). For absolute quantification, standards were made from cDNA fragments of each rol gene amplified using conventional PCR with specific primers (Table 1) and the pRiA4M70GUS plasmid DNA as a template, and subsequently purified from agarose gels (GeneJET Gel Extraction Kit, Thermo Scientific). After spectrophotometric quantification, the number of recovered DNA molecules was calculated (http://endmemo.com/bio/dnacopynum. php) and serial dilutions of the DNAs were made (from 108–10 copies per ll). Overall efficiencies (E) of PCR were calculated from the slopes of the standard curves for serial dilutions. Results are presented as the mean transcript number per 1 ng of total RNA with the standard error (SE) of the mean. The statistical significance of the differences between the means was determined by ANOVA and Fisher’s LSD test (P B 0.05). Flow cytometry Shoots from in vitro-grown regenerants and young leaves of field-grown plants were collected and used for analysis. The DNA content was determined using flow cytometry on isolated nuclei stained with propidium iodide (PI), according to Dolezˇel (1991). Briefly, leaf tissue of the studied H. perforatum lines was chopped together with leaves of Trifolium repens L. cv. Milo (2C = 2.07; Arumuganathan and Earle 1991) in LB01 buffer. Nuclei were passed through a 10-lm nylon-mesh filter and stained with 50 lg ml-1 PI and 50 lg ml-1 ribonuclease. Measurements were done on a PAS flow cytometer (Partec, Mu¨nster, Germany) using a linear scale. Samples were analyzed using an argon laser tuned to 488 nm, with emissions measured through an RG 590 long-pass optical filter. Seven thousand nuclei per sample were measured with three repetitions for each line. Flomax software (Partec) was used for calculating the positions of the G0/G1 peaks.

Table 1 Primers used for real-time RT-PCR analyses of rol genes and GAPDH reference gene with the expected amplification product sizes

rolA

Primer sequences (50 –30 )

Product size (bp)

Reference

GTT-AGG-CGT-GCA-AAG-GCC-AAG

203

Mitic´ et al. (2012)

348

Mitic´ et al. (2012)

342

Mitic´ et al. (2012)

101

Komarovska´ et al. (2010)

134

He et al. (2012)

TGC-GTA-TTA-ATC-CCG-TAG-GTC rolB

AAA-GTC-TGC-TAT-CAT-CCT-CCT-ATG AAA-GAA-GGT-GCA-AGC-TAC-CTC-TCT

rolC

TAC-GTC-GAC-TGC-CCG-ACG-ATG–ATG AAA-CTT-GCA-CTC-GCC-ATG-CCT-CAC

rolD

CTG-AGC-GTG-TGG-CTC-ATG GGA-GGT-AAA-GAC-GAA-GGA-CAG-AG

GAPDH

ATG-GAC-CAT-CAA-GCA-AGG-ACT-G GAA-GGC-CAT-TCC-AGT-CAA-CTT-C

123

37

Page 4 of 12

Results and discussion Impact of sucrose concentration on shoot regeneration potential of hairy roots The morphological evaluation of the hairy root clones in response to 0.5–8 % sucrose indicated that both genotype and sucrose concentration affected regeneration processes (Fig. 1). ANOVA confirmed that factor interaction Fig. 1 Shoot regeneration on transgenic Hypericum perforatum hairy roots of clones 14 and 29 on BM supplemented with various concentrations of sucrose (0.5–8 %). Bars represent 1 cm

123

Acta Physiol Plant (2015) 37:37

significantly affected not only root elongation and branching, but also shoot regeneration potential (Table 2). The measurement of root elongation showed that clones responded differently to various sucrose concentrations in media (Fig. 2a). Roots of clones 2 and 29 elongated intensively even at the lowest sucrose concentration of 0.5 % with an almost tripling of the initial length. These two clones reached the highest root lengths of 68.3 and 61.0 mm, respectively, on 2 % sucrose. All other clones

Acta Physiol Plant (2015) 37:37 Table 2 ANOVA table of F and P values on the effect of genotype and sucrose concentration for morphological parameters of H. perforatum hairy roots * Significant differences at 95 % according to Fisher’s LSD test

Page 5 of 12

Clone F

Sucrose

37

Clone 9 Sucrose

P

F

P

F

P

Length of main roots (mm)

5.91

0.0003*

16.76

0.0000*

1.60

0.0479*

Roots with lateral roots (%)

13.72

0.0000*

2.71

0.0257*

1.46

0.0158*

Number of lateral roots per explant

15.19

0.0000*

6.79

0.0000*

0.88

0.6151

Roots with regenerated shoots (%)

2.98

0.0231*

10.40

0.0000*

1.97

0.0165*

Number of regenerated shoots per explant

4.67

0.0002*

12.41

0.0000*

1.21

0.4523

had length increases of about 5 mm at the lowest sucrose level and reached a maximum on 4 % sucrose (63.5, 58.6 and 67.7 mm for clones 14, 15 and 27, respectively). A similar response to sucrose was observed for lateral root differentiation (Fig. 2b, c). For clones 2 and 29, about 80 % of hairy roots developed more than six lateral roots per explant on 0.5 % sucrose. Conversely, for the other three clones, only 20 % of roots tended to form just one lateral root per explant. For these clones, the highest lateral root differentiation was obtained on medium with 4 % sucrose, but with significantly lower frequencies (60–70 %) and with a maximum of only six roots per explant. The highest number of lateral roots (almost 14) was scored for clone 2 grown on 4 % sucrose. On concentrations higher than 4 %, all clones showed a decline in the average number of lateral roots. Similar results showing that sucrose concentration affects the growth of in vitro-maintained hairy roots, with optimal responses on between 3 and 5 % sucrose, were obtained by Lourenc¸o et al. (2002) for Centaurea calcitrapa and Yu et al. (1996) for Solanum aviculare. Although it has been reported that hairy root clones of H. perforatum spontaneously regenerate shoots on hormone-free medium supplemented with sucrose at concentrations of 2 % (Vinterhalter et al. 2006) or 3 % (Di Guardo et al. 2003), our results show that this process is considerably affected by sucrose. Root segments of clones 2, 27 and 29 regenerated the maximum percentage of shoots at lower sucrose concentrations (2 % for clones 2 and 27 and 1 % for clone 29). In contrast, for the most intensive regeneration in clones 14 and 15, more sucrose (4 %) was required. The highest number of root explants with initiated shoots was recorded for clone 14 on 4 % sucrose (more than 80 %) (Fig. 3a), which also had a remarkably high number of regenerated shoots (6.5 shoots per root explant) (Fig. 3b). Plant cells and tissues grown in vitro due to a lack of autotrophic ability require the addition of an external carbon source into the growth medium. The most commonly used carbon supply is sucrose, which at an optimal concentration is sufficient for the energy requirements of basic cell division and differentiation. Moreover, it has been well-documented that sucrose is one of the factors that controls the induction and growth of shoots and that it can,

at physiologically relevant concentrations, significantly promote regeneration processes in plants grown in vitro (Gibson 2000; Pavlovic´ et al. 2010; Ilyas et al. 2013; Rathore et al. 2013), especially in non-autotrophic systems such as hairy roots (Yu et al. 1996; Lourenc¸o et al. 2002). In addition to acting as the main energy source, sugars also act as potent signaling molecules in plants (Hanson and Smeekens 2009). Since Wu et al. (2005) found that exogenous sucrose in the growth medium fully restored the elongation of the Arabidopsis growth-arrested stip mutants by reactivating their primary shoot and root meristems, there have been indications that sucrose has a signaling function regarding the sequence of events in the cell cycle and, in combination with auxins and cytokinins, regulates plant cell proliferation and development (Francis and Halford 2006; Hartig and Beck 2006). Some of the mechanisms by which sugar regulates morphogenesis have already been elucidated. Earlier reports found that sucrose can accelerate growth by activating D-type cyclin (CYCD) expression, which promotes the G1 to S cell cycle phase transition (Riou-Khamlichi et al. 2000; Gaudin et al. 2000). CYCD4 expression during the formation of lateral root primordia in Arabidopsis was also found to be induced by the addition of sucrose in a suspension culture (De Veylder et al. 1999). More recent studies have confirmed the regulatory role of sugar on CycD gene induction and expression (Kwon and Wang 2011; Rosa et al. 2013). In addition, Skylar et al. (2011) demonstrated that sugar signals also indirectly activate the transcription of key cell components for the G2 to M phase transition and thus affect meristem proliferation, size and structure. Therefore, differential reaction of an individual clone to a particular sucrose concentration could be explained by its individual genetic and physiological makeup, since sugar signals are linked in a signaling network to plant hormones, resulting in a specific morphogenetic pathway. Although the morphogenetic responses of the analyzed hairy root clones were different, we observed a strong influence of the sucrose concentration on this process. Low, suboptimal sucrose concentrations (below 2 %) probably could not provide enough energy and acted only as building blocks, so hairy roots developed few secondary roots and failed to regenerate shoot buds. However, when present

123

37

Page 6 of 12

Acta Physiol Plant (2015) 37:37

Fig. 2 Hypericum perforatum hairy root clones performance on BM with various concentrations of sucrose (0.5–8 %). Main root length (a), percentage of roots with developed lateral roots (b), and number of lateral roots per root explant (c) were scored after 35 days of

treatment. Results are expressed as mean ± SE (n = 30–60). Values with the same letters are not significantly different at the P B 0.05 level according to Fisher’s LSD test

in high, supraoptimal concentrations (6–8 %), sucrose had negative effects, possibly due to higher osmotic pressure, which has been shown to be deleterious to root primordium induction (Cui et al. 2010).

Interestingly, shoots regenerated from hairy roots did not show the phenotypic changes typical of so-called ‘‘hairy root syndrome’’ (Fig. 4a). This is quite unusual for A. rhizogenes transformed plants, since the expression of

123

Acta Physiol Plant (2015) 37:37

Page 7 of 12

37

Fig. 3 Shoot regeneration potential of Hypericum perforatum hairy roots grown on BM with various concentrations of sucrose (0.5–8 %). Percentage of roots with regenerated shoots (a) and the mean number of regenerated shoots per root explant (b) were scored after 35 days

of treatment. Results are expressed as mean ± SE (n = 30–60); values with the same letters are not significantly different at the P B 0.05 level according to Fisher’s LSD test

rol genes alters the normal phenotypic appearance in many plant species, including H. perforatum (Di Guardo et al. 2003; Koperda´kova´ et al. 2009). All transgenic Hypericum plants obtained by A4M70GUS transformation in the present study and regenerated on media with sucrose concentrations up to 4 % were phenotypically normal, with articulated apical growth, opposite, simple oval leaves, and characteristic black glands on the leaf edges (Fig. 4a, b). However, when applied at concentrations of 4 % and higher, sucrose had an adverse effect on the growth of both shoots and roots (Fig. 4c, d). Roots became dark brown, with red tips (Fig. 4c) and the dark glands were less prominent on most of the leaves (Fig. 4d).

phenotype, the presence of the rolA, -B, -C and -D genes was demonstrated by PCR in all clones (Fig. 5). No specific amplifications of rol transgenes were observed in control plants. Furthermore, Southern hybridization confirmed the stable integration of the 4.3 kb EcoRI fragment, containing the rolA, -B and -C genes, in all five clones (data not shown). These genes are essential and sufficient for induction and development of hairy roots (Jouanin et al. 1987). In addition, flow cytometric measurements revealed that all transgenic as well as non-transformed control plants were diploid with an average nuclear DNA content of 0.670 ± 0.002 pg per nucleus, with no significant differences between the analyzed lines. Since flow cytometry is a reliable tool used for the detection of variants among regenerated transgenic plants (Ochatt et al. 2013), the genomic stability found in the present study confirmed that it was not affected either by transformation or by the in vitro regeneration process, indicating trueness-to-type of the reported transgenic plants.

Genetic characterization of H. perforatum regenerated shoots Although hairy root-derived shoots displayed a lack of morphological alterations typical of the hairy root

123

37

Page 8 of 12

Acta Physiol Plant (2015) 37:37

Fig. 4 Shoot regeneration on transgenic Hypericum perforatum hairy roots of clone 15. Regenerated shoots on 2 % sucrose (a) with normal phenotypic appearance and black glands on leaf edges indicated by an arrow (b) and hairy roots grown on 8 % sucrose with no regenerated shoots and red root apices (c). Shoots regenerated on 6 % sucrose had fewer black glands on leaf edges (d). Bars represent 1 cm

According to their morphogenetic process, all analyzed H. perforatum transgenic clones were grouped into two categories. Clones 2 and 29 possessed high lateral root differentiation potential at lower sucrose concentrations (below 2 %), but with less effective shoot bud proliferation. On the other hand, clones 14, 15 and 27 had lower lateral roots, but higher shoot differentiation potential on sucrose-enriched media (2–4 %). We assumed that the observed differences in the morphogenic potential of the tested clones could also be result of the transformation process itself. Alternations in the development and metabolism of transformed plants could be attributed to unique transformation events, such as the number of inserted copies and their position in the plant genome, levels of expression, methylation and the chromatin structure at the insertion site (Kooter et al. 1999; Vaucheret and Fagard 2001). To determine the mRNA levels of the rolA, -B, -C and D genes, we used the real-time RT-PCR approach. Three of five analyzed clones were selected according to their morphogenetic performance (clones 2, 14 and 27). Realtime RT-PCR confirmed the expression of the rolA, -B and -C genes, while the expression of the rolD gene was not detected, although its presence was confirmed by PCR, as

123

mentioned above. Similar loss of expression for rolD has been reported by others (Slightom et al. 1986; Chriqui et al. 1996; Alpizar et al. 2008; Koperda´kova´ et al. 2009; Komarovska´ et al. 2010). For the other three analyzed rol genes, considerable differences were detected in the absolute amounts of the transcripts between clones (Table 3). The highest levels of expression for all three analyzed rol genes were detected in clone 2. About 13 times more rolA and rolB and 4 times more rolC transcripts were detected in the shoots of clone 2 than in clones 14 and 27, which had similar levels of expression. Differences in the relative proportions of the expression of each transgene were also documented by Koperda´kova´ et al. (2009), with decreased amounts of the rolC transcript compared to the rolA and rolB transcripts. In both cases, an effect of the differential position on the expression of each transgene, despite having been linked in the same inserted T-DNA, could be the explanation (Beltra´n et al. 2009). Taken altogether, our results show that clone 2, when grown on regular BM with 2 % sucrose, had higher expression of rol genes; this was reflected in the increased elongation of root explants and intensive lateral root development. Two other clones had significantly lower levels of rol gene transcripts, which correlated with shorter

Acta Physiol Plant (2015) 37:37

Page 9 of 12

37

Table 3 Real-time RT-PCR analysis of rolA, rolB and rolC expression in shoots of 5-week-old in vitro-grown transgenic Hypericum perforatum clones 2, 14 and 27, and non-transformed controls (NTC) rolA (104.1) NTC 2 14 27

rolB (87.4)



rolC (82.7)

– b

1946.07 ± 33.57 a

142.06 ± 24.67

a

154.08 ± 22.55

– b

155.96 ± 25.79

81.15 ± 4.90b

13.86 ± 1.77

a

18.98 ± 3.11a

10.65 ± 2.12

a

20.65 ± 1.00a

Efficiencies of qPCR reactions for each gene are given in brackets Amounts of transcripts are presented as number of copies per 1 ng total RNA. Results are expressed as mean ± SE (n = 6). Means marked with different letters in each column are significantly different according to Fisher’s LSD test (P B 0.05). The amplification efficiencies of the cDNAs for genes rolA, -B and -C were calculated according to the slopes (-3.35, -3.66 and -3.45, respectively) obtained for each linear regression corresponding to standard curves

Fig. 5 PCR analysis of rolA, -B, -C and -D genes in A. rhizogenesmediated transformed Hypericum perforatum in vitro-grown plants. L 100 bp DNA molecular weight marker, NTC non-transformed control, A.r. positive control (DNA from the plasmid used for A. rhizogenes-mediated transformation); B PCR blank. Numbers refer to individual H. perforatum transformed lines (2, 14, 15, 27 and 29)

roots and fewer lateral roots. In accordance with these findings, shoot development was more favored in clones 14 and 27 than in clone 2. We believe that more rol transcripts direct morphogenesis to root versus shoot development. There have already been some attempts to correlate the phenotypic appearance with the number of rol gene insertions in Hypericum. Komarovska´ et al. (2010) claimed that the number of rol genes integrated into clones transformed with the agropine ATCC 15834 strain influenced almost all analyzed quantitative characteristics, as well as the total content of hypericins. Plants with a higher

transgene copy number resembled the controls, while those with one or two integrations expressed the features typical of hairy root syndrome more intensively. These authors believed that post-transcriptional silencing, caused by a high number of copies, was responsible for the similarities between clones with more rol copies and controls. The behavior of hairy roots grown on elevated concentrations of sucrose (4 %) emphasized the role of rol genes in directing transformed plant development. An increase in the sucrose levels for clone 2 caused similar or even more intensive rooting, while the number of regenerated shoots significantly declined. For clones 14 and 27, sucrose promoted rooting, supporting the hypothesis of the inductive effects of sucrose on rol gene expression. Namely, it is known that sucrose can modulate the expression of the rolC promoter (Yokoyama et al. 1994; Nillson et al. 1996). Furthermore, it is thought that rolB has a crucial role for the induction of rhizogenesis, and that both sucrose and auxins, as regulators of its promoter, are necessary. Only cells with sufficient levels of these compounds will be competent to serve as targets for A. rhizogenes infection and will induce the formation of adventitious roots (Nilsson and Olsson 1997). At the same time, sucrose enhances the sensitivity of cells to auxins (Lazzeri et al. 1988), thereby stimulating rolB promoter activity. Elevated expression of the rolB and rolC unequivocally leads to intensified rhizogenesis as opposed to shoot development.

Conclusions Variations in shoot morphogenesis potential promoted by sucrose were observed for H. perforatum hairy root clones. Different sucrose concentrations in the growth media

123

37

Page 10 of 12

affected shoot development, with clones 2 and 29 more effective on lower sucrose concentrations, while the other three clones, 14, 15 and 27, intensified shoot development only on elevated sucrose concentrations (4 %). For all clones, concentrations above 4 % (6–8 %) had deleterious effects on both root and shoot development. Thus, in further investigation, selection of clones with intensified regeneration of morphologically normal shoots on the media with regular or slightly elevated sucrose concentration will be undertaken. We assumed the observed variations in morphogenesis potential could be attributed to different levels of expression of the integrated A. rhizogenes genes rolA, -B and -C. Clones with higher levels of rol genes expression had more intensive root development, which was expected according to their original role in the promotion of root formation. So far, H. perforatum hairy root cultures have not been subjected to phytochemical analysis of their secondary metabolite contents. Therefore, the established transgenic H. perforatum cultures represent a well-defined and powerful tool for further biotechnological and metabolomic investigations. The examination of the secondary metabolite content in regenerated shoots, as well as the influence of sucrose on this, will be the focus of subsequent studies. Author contribution statement B. V. and D. V. designed research; B. V. performed sucrose treatments and did statistical analyses; S. Z-K. performed Southern analysis and contributed in writing of the manuscript; N. M. performed PCR analyses and contributed in writing of the manuscript; B. B. performed flow cytometry; J. S. performed real-time RT-PCR analyses, wrote the manuscript and prepared figures. Acknowledgments This research was funded by Ministry of Education, Science and Technological Development of Serbia (Project ON173015).

References Alpizar E, Dechamp E, Lapeyre-Montes F, Guilhaumon C, Bertrand B, Jourdan C, Lashermes P, Etienne H (2008) Agrobacterium rhizogenes-transformed roots of coffee (Coffea arabica): conditions for long-term proliferation, and morphological and molecular characterization. Ann Bot 101:929–940 Arumuganathan K, Earle ED (1991) Nuclear DNA content of some important plant species. Plant Mol Biol Rep 9:208–218 Beerhues L (2006) Hyperforin. Phytochemistry 67:2201–2207 Beltra´n J, Jaimes H, Echeverry M, Ladino Y, Lo´pez D, Duque MC, Chavarriaga P, Tohme J (2009) Quantitative analysis of transgenes in cassava plants using real-time PCR technology. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Plant 45:48–56 Bertoli A, Giovannini A, Ruffoni B, Di Guardo A, Spinelli G, Mazzetti M, Pistelli L (2008) Bioactive constituent production in St. John’s wort in vitro hairy roots. Regenerated plant lines. J Agric Food Chem 56:5078–5082

123

Acta Physiol Plant (2015) 37:37 Bourgaud F, Gravot A, Milesi S, Gontier E (2001) Production of plant secondary metabolites: a historical perspective. Plant Sci 161:839–851 Bu¨ter B, Orlacchio C, Soldati A, Berger K (1998) Significance of genetic and environmental aspects in the field cultivation of Hypericum perforatum. Planta Med 64:431–437 Butterweck V (2003) Mechanism of action of St John’s wort in depression: what is known? CNS Drugs 17:539–562 Chaudhuri KN, Ghosh B, Tepfer D, Jha S (2006) Spontaneous plant regeneration in transformed roots and calli from Tylophora indica: changes in morphological phenotype and tylophorine accumulation associated with transformation by Agrobacterium rhizogenes. Plant Cell Rep 25:1059–1066 Chriqui D, Guivarc’h A, Dewitte W, Prinsen E, van Onkelen H (1996) Rol genes and root initiation and development. Plant Soil 187:47–55 Ciccarelli D, Andreucci AC, Pagni AM (2001) Translucent glands and secretory canals in Hypericum perforatum L. (Hypericaceae): morphological, anatomical and histochemical studies during the course of ontogenesis. Ann Bot 88:637–644 C¸irak C, Radusiene J, Ivanauskas L, Jakstas V, C¸amas¸ N (2014) Phenological changes in the chemical content of wild and greenhouse-grown Hypericum pruinatum: flavonoids. Turk J Agric For 38:362–370 Cui X-H, Chakrabarty D, Lee E-J, Paek K-Y (2010) Production of adventitious roots and secondary metabolites by Hypericum perforatum L. in bioreactor. Bioresource Technol 101: 4708–4716 De Veylder L, De Almeida-Engler J, Burssens S, Manevski A, Lescure B, Van Montagu M, Engler G, Inze´ D (1999) A new D-type cyclin of Arabidopsis thaliana expressed during lateral root primordia formation. Planta 208:453–462 Di Guardo A, Cˇella´rova´ E, Koperda´kova´ J, Pistelli L, Ruffoni B, Allavena A, Giovannini A (2003) Hairy root induction and plant regeneration in Hypericum perforatum L. J Genet Breed 57:269–278 Dolezˇel J (1991) Flow cytometric analysis of nuclear DNA content in higher plants. Phytochem analysis 2:143–154 Fiebich BL, Kno¨rle R, Appel K, Kammler T, Weiss G (2011) Pharmacological studies in an herbal drug combination of St. John’s Wort (Hypericum perforatum) and passion flower (Passiflora incarnata): in vitro and in vivo evidence of synergy between Hypericum and Passiflora in antidepressant pharmacological models. Fitoterapia 82:474–480 Francis D, Halford NG (2006) Nutrient sensing in plant meristems. Plant Mol Biol 60:981–993 Gangopadhyay M, Chakraborty D, Bhattacharyya S, Bhattacharya S (2010) Regeneration of transformed plants from hairy roots of Plumbago indica. Plant Cell Tiss Organ Cult 102:109–114 Gasic K, Hernandez A, Korban SS (2004) RNA extraction from different apple tissues rich in polyphenols and polysaccharides for cDNA library construction. Plant Mol Biol Rep 22:437a– 437g Gaudin V, Lunness PA, Fobert PR, Towers M, Riou-Khamlichi C, Murray JA, Coen E, Doonan JH (2000) The expression of D-cyclin genes defines distinct developmental zones in snapdragon apical meristems and is locally regulated by the Cycloidea gene. Plant Physiol 122:1137–1148 Gibson IS (2000) Plant sugar-response pathways. Part of a complex regulatory web. Plant Physiol 124:1532–1539 Hanson J, Smeekens S (2009) Sugar perception and signaling—an update. Curr Opin Plant Biol 12:562–567 Hartig K, Beck E (2006) Crosstalk between auxin, cytokinins, and sugars in the plant cell cycle. Plant Biol 8:389–396 He M, Wang Y, Hua W, Zhang Y, Wang Z (2012) De novo sequencing of Hypericum perforatum transcriptome to identify

Acta Physiol Plant (2015) 37:37 potential genes involved in the biosynthesis of active metabolites. PLoS One 7(7):e42081 Ilyas S, Naz S, Javad S, Shehzadi K, Tariq A, Munir N, Ali A (2013) Influence of cytokinins, sucrose and pH on adventitious shoot regeneration of Polyscias balfouriana (Balfour aralia). Global J Med Plant Res 1:31–37 Jouanin L, Vilaine F, Tourneur C, Pautot V, Muller JF, Caboche M (1987) Transfer of a 4.3-kb fragment of the TL-DNA of Agrobacterium rhizogenes strain A4 confers the pRi transformed phenotype to regenerated tobacco plants. Plant Sci 53:53–63 Karppinen K, Hohtola A (2008) Molecular cloning and tissue-specific expression of two cDNAs encoding polyketide synthases from Hypericum perforatum. J Plant Physiol 165:1079–1086 Karuppusamy S (2009) A review on trends in production of secondary metabolites from higher plants by in vitro tissue, organ and cell cultures. J Med Plants Res 3:1222–1239 Komarovska´ H, Kosˇuth J, Giovannini A, Smelcerovic A, Zuehlke S, Cˇella´rova´ E (2010) Effect of number of rol genes integrations on phenotypic variation in hairy root-derived Hypericum perforatum L. plants. Z Naturforsch 65c:701–712 Kooter JM, Matzke MA, Meyer P (1999) Listening to the silent genes: transgene silencing, gene regulation and pathogen control. Trends Plant Sci 4:340–347 ˇ ella´rova´ E Koperda´kova´ J, Komarovska´ H, Kosˇuth J, Giovannini A, C (2009) Characterization of hairy root-phenotype in transgenic Hypericum perforatum L. clones. Acta Physiol Plant 31:351–358 Koperda´kova´ J, Komarovska´ H, Kosˇuth J, Cˇella´rova´ E (2011) Transgenosis in the genus Hypericum: transgenic St. John’s wort plants. Medicinal Aromatic Plant Sci Biotech 5:53–61 Kubin A, Wierrani F, Burner U, Alth G, Gru¨nberger W (2005) Hypericin—the facts about a controversial agent. Curr Pharm Des 11:233–253 Kwon HK, Wang MH (2011) The D-type cyclin gene (Nicta;CycD3;4) controls cell cycle progression in response to sugar availability in tobacco. J Plant Physiol 168:133–139 Lazzeri PA, Hildebrand DF, Sunega J, Williams EG, Collins GB (1988) Soybean somatic embryogenesis: interactions between sucrose and auxin. Plant Cell Rep 7:517–520 Lloyd G, McCown B (1981) Commercially feasible micropropagation of mountain laurel, Kalmia latifolia by use of shoot tip culture. Proc Int Plant Propag Soc 30:421–427 Lourenc¸o PML, de Castro S, Martins TM, Clemente A, Domingos A (2002) Growth and proteolytic activity of hairy roots from Centaurea calcitrapa: effect of nitrogen and sucrose. Enzyme Microb Tech 31:242–249 Majumdar S, Garai S, Jha S (2011) Genetic transformation of Bacopa monnieri by wild type strains of Agrobacterium rhizogenes stimulates production of bacopa saponins in transformed calli and plants. Plant Cell Rep 30:941–954 McCoy JA, Camper ND (2002) Development of a micropropagation protocol for St. John’s Wort (Hypericum perforatum L.). Hort Sci 37:978–980 Mitic´ N, Dmitrovic´ S, Djordjevic´ M, Zdravkovic´-Korac´ S, Nikolic´ R, Raspor M, Djordjevic´ T, Maksimovic´ V, Zˇivkovic´ S, Krstic´Milosˇevic´ D, Stanisˇic´ M, Ninkovic´ S (2012) Use of Chenopodium murale L. transgenic hairy root in vitro culture system as a new tool for allelopathic assays. J Plant Physiol 169: 1203–1211 Murashige T, Skoog F (1962) A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol Plant 15:473–497 Nathan PJ (2001) Hypericum perforatum (St John’s Wort): a nonselective reuptake inhibitor? A review of the recent advances in its pharmacology. J Psychopharmacol 15:47–54 Nillson O, Little CHA, Sandberg G, Ollson O (1996) Expression of two heterologous promoters, Agrobacterium rhizogenes rolC and cauliflower mosaic virus 35S, in the stem of transgenic hybrid

Page 11 of 12

37

aspen plants during the annual cycle of growth and dormancy. Plant Mol Biol 31:887–895 Nilsson O, Olsson O (1997) Getting to the root: the role of the Agrobacterium rhizogenes rol genes in the formation of hairy roots. Physiol Plant 100:463–473 Ochatt S, Jacas L, Patat-Ochatt EM, Djenanne S (2013) Flow cytometric analysis and molecular characterization of Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated transformants of Medicago truncatula. Plant Cell Tiss Organ Cult 113:237–244 Pavlovic´ S, Vinterhalter B, Mitic´ N, Adzˇic´ S, Pavlovic´ N, Zdravkovic´ M, Vinterhalter D (2010) In vitro shoot regeneration from seedling explants in Brassica vegetables: red cabbage, broccoli, Savoy cabbage and cauliflower. Arch Biol Sci 62:337–345 Rathore S, Narender S, Singh SK (2013) Role of sucrose and season on rapid in vitro regeneration for two Stevia genotypes. GJBB 2:150–153 Riou-Khamlichi C, Menges M, Healy JM, Murray JA (2000) Sugar control of the plant cell cycle: differential regulation of Arabidopsis D-type cyclin gene expression. Mol Cell Biol 20:4513–4521 Rosa YBCJ, Aizza LCB, Armanhi JSL, Dornelas MC (2013) A Passiflora homolog of a D-type cyclin gene is differentially expressed in response to sucrose, auxin, and cytokinin. Plant Cell Tiss Organ Cult 115:233–242 Roychowdhury D, Majumder A, Jha S (2013) Agrobacterium rhizogenes-mediated transformation in medicinal plants: prospects and challenges. In: Chandra S, Lata H, Varma A (eds) Biotechnology for medicinal plants: Micropropagation and improvement. Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg, pp 29–68 Silva BA, Ferreres F, Malva JO, Dias ACP (2005) Phytochemical and antioxidant characterization of Hypericum perforatum alcoholic extracts. Food Chem 90:157–167 Skylar A, Sung F, Hong F, Chory J, Wu X (2011) Metabolic sugar signal promotes Arabidopsis meristematic proliferation via G2. Dev Biol 351:82–89 Slightom JL, Durand-Tardif M, Jouanin L, Tepfer D (1986) Nucleotide sequence analysis of TL-DNA of Agrobacterium rhizogenes agropine type plasmid: identification of open reading frames. J Biol Chem 261:108–121 Southwell IA, Campbell MH (1991) Hypericin content variations in Hypericum perforatum in Australia. Phytochem 30:475–478 Tepfer M, Casse-Delbart F (1987) Agrobacterium rhizogenes as a vector for transforming higher plants. Microbiol Sci 4:24–28 Vaucheret H, Fagard M (2001) Transcriptional gene silencing in plants: targets, inducers and regulators. Trends Genet 17:29–35 Vinterhalter B, Ninkovic´ S, Cingel A, Vinterhalter D (2006) Shoot and root culture of Hypericum perforatum L. transformed with Agrobacterium rhizogenes A4M70GUS. Biol Plant 50:767–770 Wu X, Dabi T, Weigel D (2005) Requirement of homeobox gene STIMPY/WOX9 for Arabidopsis meristem growth and maintenance. Curr Biol 15:436–440 Wu SQ, Yu XK, Lian ML, Park SY, Piao XC (2014) Several factors affecting hypericin production of Hypericum perforatum during adventitious root culture in airlift bioreactors. Acta Physiol Plant 36:975–981 Yokoyama R, Hirose T, Fujti N, Aspuria ET, Kato A, Uchimiya H (1994) The rolC promoter of Agrobacterium rhizogenes Ri plasmid is activated by sucrose in transgenic tobacco plants. Mol Gen Genet 244:15–22 Yu S, Kwok KH, Doran PM (1996) Effect of sucrose, exogenous product concentration, and other culture conditions on growth and steroidal alkaloid production by Solanum aviculare hairy roots. Enzyme Microb Tech 18:238–243 Zhou LG, Wu JY (2006) Development and application of medicinal plant tissue cultures for production of drugs and herbal medicinals in China. Nat Prod Rep 23:789–810

123

37

Page 12 of 12

Zhou X, Cao G, Lin R, Sun Y, Li W (1994) A rapid and efficient DNA extraction method of genus Fagopyrum for RAPD analysis. In: Javornik B, Bohanec B, Kreft I (eds) Proceedings of impact of plant biotechnology on agriculture. Biotechnical Faculty, Ljubljana, pp 171–175

123

Acta Physiol Plant (2015) 37:37 Zobayed SMA, Afreen F, Goto E, Kozai T (2006) Plant-environment interactions: accumulation of hypericins in dark glands of Hypericum perforatum. Ann Bot (Lond) 98:793–804