Effects of postural change on transesophageal echocardiography ...

6 downloads 0 Views 1MB Size Report
Dec 16, 2016 - Hirsch, R., Kilner, P. J., Connelly, M. S., Redington, A. N., St John Sutton, M. G.. 300 and Somerville ... McConahay, D. R., Martin, C. M. and Cheitlin, M. D. 1972. Resting and .... Vorys, N., Ullery, J. C. and Hanusek, G. E. 1961.
Advance Publication

The Journal of Veterinary Medical Science Accepted Date: 24 Nov 2016 J-STAGE Advance Published Date: 16 Dec 2016

1

Internal Medicine

2

FULL PAPER

3

Effects of Postural Change on Transesophageal Echocardiography Views and

4

Parameters in Healthy Dogs

5 6

Seijirow Goya 1) *, Tomoki Wada 1), Kazumi Shimada 1), Daiki Hirao 1), Ryuji

7

Fukushima 1), Norio Yamagishi 2), Miki Shimizu 3) and Ryou Tanaka 1)

8 9

1)

Department of Veterinary Surgery, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Tokyo

10

University of Agriculture and Technology, 3-5-8 Saiwai-cho, Fuchu-shi, Tokyo, 183-

11

0052, Japan

12

2)

13

University, 3-18-8 Ueda-cho, Morioka-shi, Iwate, 020-8550, Japan

14

3)

15

Tokyo University of Agriculture and Technology, 3-5-8 Saiwai-cho, Fuchu-shi,

16

Tokyo, 183-0052, Japan

Department of Veterinary Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Agriculture, Iwate

Department of Veterinary Diagnostic imaging, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine,

17 18

*Correspondence to

19

Goya S., Department of Veterinary Surgery, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Tokyo

20

University of Agriculture and Technology, 3-5-8 Saiwai-cho, Fuchu-shi, Tokyo, 183-

21

0052, Japan. e-mail: [email protected]

22 23

Running head

24

EFFECTS OF POSTURAL CHANGE ON TEE PARAMETERS 1

25 26

ABSTRACT The purpose of the present study is to investigate the effect of postural change on

27

transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) views and parameters of interest anesthesia

28

monitoring in healthy dogs. Twelve Beagle dogs were anesthetized and randomly

29

positioned in one of four postures: right lateral-recumbency, left lateral-recumbency,

30

supine position and prone position. After examinations in one posture, the same

31

examination was demonstrated in another posture and repeated in all postures. In each

32

posture, several standard TEE views were demonstrated: longitudinal cranial-

33

esophageal aorta long-axis-view, transverse middle-esophageal mitral valve long-

34

axis-view and transgastric middle short-axis-view. Additionally, echocardiographic

35

parameters were attempted to measure, and direct blood pressure monitoring was

36

performed in each view. As a result, oriented views, except for transgastric middle

37

short-axis-view, could be obtained in all postures. Stroke volume and peak early

38

diastolic velocity of mitral inflow were lower in supine position compared with those

39

in right and left lateral-recumbency. Heart rate (HR) and systemic vascular resistance

40

were higher in supine position compared with those in right and left lateral-

41

recumbency. Left ventricular pre-ejection period/left ventricular ejection time

42

corrected and uncorrected by HR were higher in supine position compared with those

43

in right and left lateral-recumbency. In conclusion, longitudinal cranial-esophageal

44

aorta long-axis-view and transverse middle-esophageal mitral valve long-axis-view

45

provide useful information of interest anesthesia monitoring, because of their views

46

enable to certainly obtain TEE parameters in various postures. Furthermore, TEE

47

parameters allow to detect the changes of preload, afterload and HR that occur in

48

supine position dogs. 2

49

KEY WORDS: cardiovascular system, dog, echocardiography, ultrasound

50

In human medicine, transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) has been recognized

51

as a useful tool not only for diagnosis of congenital heart disease [14, 24] and for an

52

assessment tool of interventional cardiology [1, 28], but also for a noninvasive

53

intraoperative monitoring of cardiac function in patients with severe conditions, such

54

as heart failure [10, 31, 34]. Although TEE has been mainly used as an assistant tool

55

for catheter intervention in veterinary medicine [23, 30, 33, 35], few reports on the

56

intraoperative cardiac evaluation are available in dogs with heart failure. To enhance

57

anesthetic safety, intraoperative blood pressure has been monitored by way of

58

prevention of acute renal disorders and cerebral ischemia [21].

59

Considering fully understanding of intraoperative hemodynamics, however, blood

60

pressure measurement alone is not always the answer to explain the mechanism of

61

hypotension. Hypotension can be caused by several factors: decrease in preloa d,

62

afterload, and contractility and echocardiographic measurements allow to reveal these

63

cardiac information during surgery. For the intraoperative echocardiography

64

monitoring under anesthesia, animal positions undergoing surger y usually depend on

65

the operative procedure and transthoracic echocardiography is sometimes unavailable

66

for evaluation. Therefore, TEE parameters should be the only option for the purpose

67

of intraoperative monitoring. Several experimental reports addressing the utility of

68

TEE parameters in evaluating canine cardiac function were performed only in lateral-

69

recumbency [7, 13]. Postural change may alter the positional relation of the

70

intrathoracic organs and influence echocardiographic views, and the effects of

71

postural differences on TEE views and parameters should be considered. The present

3

72

study was conducted to elucidate the effects of postural change on conventional TEE

73

views and echocardiographic parameters.

74

MATERIALS AND METHODS

75

During the study, the dogs were managed and cared for in accordance with the

76

standards established by the Tokyo University of Agriculture and Technology

77

(TUAT) and described in its ‘‘Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals.”

78

This study was approved by the Experimental Animal Committee of TUAT

79

(acceptance no. 26-87).

80

Animals: We used twelve, 1- to 2-year-old Beagle dogs (8 males and 4 females)

81

weighing 10.0 ± 1.0 kg (range, 8.4 - 11.7 kg). The dogs were evaluated with general

82

physical examination, blood and serum biochemical evaluations, electrocardiography,

83

thoracic radiography and echocardiography, and then, all were declared as healthy.

84

Anesthesia and preparatory procedures: Dogs were premedicated with meloxicam

85

(0.2 mg/kg, SC), butorphanol tartrate (0.2 mg/kg, IV) and midazolam hydrochloride

86

(0.2 mg/kg, IV). Induction was achieved with propofol (4 mg/kg, IV), after which the

87

dog was intubated. Anesthesia was maintained by administering a mixture of 1.5 -

88

2.0% isoflurane and oxygen. The respiratory rate and airway pressure were

89

maintained with a mechanical ventilator. End-tidal CO 2 was monitored and

90

maintained between 35 and 45 mmHg using a monitoring instrument. A 5 MHz rotary

91

plane transesophageal probe (Aloka UST-52119S, Hitachi Aloka Medical, Tokyo,

92

Japan) connected to an ultrasound machine (Prosound α10, Hitachi Aloka Medical)

93

was navigated according to the technique as described in literatures [9, 19]. The dogs

94

were randomly positioned in one of four postures: right lateral recumbency, left

95

lateral recumbency, supine position and prone position. After the examination in a 4

96

posture was finished, another posture was selected randomly, and then, the dogs were

97

changed their position quietly. This process was repeated consecutively until the end

98

of examination in all postures. In each posture, the examination was conducted for at

99

least 10 min after hemodynamics stabilization was achieved.

100

TEE measurements: In accordance with reports [9, 19], the following three views

101

were attempted to be displayed in each posture. Echocardiographic measurements

102

were performed at the end of the expiration period. Data was collected and analyzed

103

by a single investigator. The mean value of 3 heart beats was calculated excluding the

104

maximum and minimum values among the 5 consecutive cardiac cycles.

105

Longitudinal cranial-esophageal aorta long-axis-view: The probe was inserted in the

106

cranial esophagus in neutral position (not flexed). Then, the transducer tip was

107

retroflexed (bend backward) and advanced caudally until an image of the heart base

108

was produced [9]. With the array angle set to 75°-85°, longitudinal views were

109

obtained. By orienting the beam centrally, the aortic arch could be seen. The sample

110

volume was placed at the place between pulmonary artery and right auricle in the

111

center of ascending aorta (Fig. 1). Stroke volume (SV) and cardiac output (CO) were

112

calculated using the cross sectional area of the aorta. Left ventricular pre-ejection

113

period (LVPEP) and ejection time (LVET) were measured, and LVPEP per LVET

114

ratio (LVPEP/LVET) was calculated by using pulsed Doppler in conjunction with

115

electrocardiography. The HR-corrected left ventricular ejection time (LVETc) and

116

LVPEP per LVETc ratio (LVPEP/LVETc) were calculated according to the report

117

[29]. HR is determined from the RR intervals of the beats immediately after preceding

118

those measured.

5

119

Transverse middle-esophageal mitral valve long-axis-view: From cranial-esophageal

120

position, by further advancing the probe in neutral position until the point in which

121

interference by the trachea was no longer present, middle-esophageal position views

122

could be produced. A 4 chamber long axis view could be achieved with 0° array angle

123

from this position [9, 19]. Doppler inflow across the mitral valve was measured by

124

use of this view, with the 2 mm sample volume positioned at the tip of the mitral

125

valve (Fig. 2). The transmitral flow velocities were measured to determine the pe ak

126

early diastolic velocity (E) and peak atrial systolic velocity (A), and peak early

127

diastolic velocity per peak atrial systolic velocity ratio (E/A) was calculated. After

128

that, tissue Doppler echocardiographic examination was performed by use of the same

129

view. The sample volume was placed at the septal mitral annulus, and the peak

130

systolic velocity of mitral annulus (Sm), the peak early diastolic velocity of mitral

131

annulus (Em), peak atrial systolic velocity of mitral annulus (Am) and peak early

132

diastolic velocity per peak early diastolic velocity of mitral annulus ratio (E/Em) were

133

determined.

134

Transgastric middle short-axis-view: The probe was advanced into the stomach until

135

the liver image was seen on the screen. The transducer tip is then completely

136

anteflexed (bend forward), and the whole probe is slightly pulled to have the stomach

137

wall adhere [9, 19]. Loyer and Thomas reported [19] that there is a short-axis-view of

138

the left ventricle at the level of the papillary muscles. The short-axis-view image of

139

the left ventricle was attempted to measure certain parameters.

140

Arterial blood pressure measurements: In a total of dogs, 24-gauge intravenous

141

catheter was inserted into the dorsalis pedis artery for direct pressure monitoring [40].

142

The invasive arterial blood pressure was directly recorded by means of a pressure 6

143

transducer (DX-300, Nihon Kohden, Tokyo, Japan) connected to the catheter. Systolic

144

arterial pressure (SAP), mean arterial pressure (MAP) and HR were determined from

145

the arterial pulse and recorded by use of the monitoring instrument. Systemic vascular

146

resistance (SVR) was calculated as SVR (Wood) = (MAP - central venous

147

pressure)/CO [41]. Central venous pressure was defined as 5 mmHg, considering a

148

lack of right atrium enlargement or jugular distension.

149

Statistical analysis: All data are reported as mean ± standard deviation (SD). The

150

differences among postures in normally distributed data were analyzed using one -way

151

repeated measures analysis of variance and Tukey’s multiple comparisons test. Non -

152

normally distributed data were analyzed using the Kruskal -Wallis test and Dunn’s

153

multiple comparisons test. Linear regression analysis for R and P values was

154

conducted to determine the Pearson correlation coefficient. Statistical significance

155

was defined as P < .05. GraphPad Prism (GraphPad Prism version 5.0a, GraphPad,

156

San Diego, CA, U.S.A.) was used to perform these statistical analyses.

157

RESULTS

158

Longitudinal cranial-esophageal aorta long-axis-view was obtained by the same

159

technique among any posture in all dogs. In regard to the effects of postural change

160

on echocardiographic parameters, SV and LVET in supine position were significantly

161

lower compared with those in right and left lateral-recumbency. LVPEP was

162

significantly prolonged in supine position compared with that in right and left lateral-

163

recumbency. LVPEP/LVET and LVPEP/LVETc were significantly higher in supine

164

position compared with those in right and left lateral-recumbency (Table 1).

165 166

Transverse middle-esophageal mitral valve long-axis-view was obtained by the same technique among any posture in all dogs. E was significantly lower in supine position 7

167

compared with that in right and left lateral-recumbency. Em was significantly lower

168

in supine position compared with that in right and left lateral-recumbency, and

169

significantly lower in prone position compared with right lateral -recumbency (Table

170

2).

171 172

Transgastric middle short-axis-view was not obtained by the clear image among any posture in all dogs.

173

HR and SVR increased significantly in supine position compared with those in right

174

and left lateral-recumbency. SAP, MAP and DAP did not show significant differences

175

among postures (Table 3). Fig. 3-1 and 3-2 shows the correlation between HR and

176

SV, LVET. HR was weakly correlated with SV (P < 0.0001, R= -0.55) and LVET (P

177

= 0.0005, R = -0.48).

178 179 180

DISCUSSION In the present study, conventional TEE techniques allowed to display longitudinal

181

cranial-esophageal aorta long-axis-view and transverse middle-esophageal mitral

182

valve long-axis-view and to measure echocardiographic parameters in any posture.

183

On the other hand, the present study also revealed the difficulty of obtaining

184

transgastric middle short-axis-view with TEE in any posture. Loyer and Thomas

185

reported [19] that transgastric middle short-axis-view could seldom be obtained by

186

TEE in dogs, lacking image or additional useful information. Unlike in humans, the

187

anatomical spatial gap between the heart and stomach results from the vertical

188

positional relationship between the cardiac longitudinal axis and esophagus. This is

189

why the transgastric middle short-axis-view was not available in dogs.

8

190

In human medicine, transgastric middle short-axis-view is used for the calculation of

191

fractional area change, which is a reliable, quick index of cardiac contractilit y [32].

192

Fractional shortening, an index of contractility, measured in transgastric middle short-

193

axis-view, is also obtained using transthoracic echocardiography in veterinary

194

medicine. Sm, which correlated with the peak value of the positive first derivative of

195

left ventricular pressure, is detectable in transverse middle-esophageal mitral valve

196

long-axis-view. Longitudinal cranial-esophageal aorta long-axis-view also can show

197

SV and CO and provides the important information related to anesthesia monitoring.

198

The longitudinal cranial-esophageal aorta long-axis-view and transverse middle-

199

esophageal mitral valve long-axis-view are views available for contractility

200

monitoring in any postures in dogs.

201

The decrease in SV and the increase in LVPEP/LVET and LVPEP/LVETc were

202

observed in supine position compared with that in right and left lateral-recumbency in

203

the present study. Several studies have reported that the corrected and uncorrected

204

LVPEP/LVET are better correlated with the ejection fraction, dP/dt and SV [6, 11,

205

12, 22]. These results show a reduction in pump function in supine position. This

206

hemodynamic change could be considered to be caused by several factors: an increase

207

in afterload, a decrease in preload and a reduction in cardiac contractility. However,

208

the effect of the reduction in contractility is likely negligible, because a significant

209

difference was not observed in Sm. The increase in SVR shows the increase in

210

afterload in supine position than right and left lateral -recumbency. The preload was

211

decreased in supine position, as shown by the reductions in E and Em [26]. LVETc is

212

a preload indicator [16, 20]; however, LVETc is also affected by afterload [36] and

213

cardiac contractility [2, 18]. Unchanged LVETc indicates the simultaneous decrease 9

214

of preload and/or the increase of afterload. A prolonged LVPEP indicates the increase

215

in afterload and/or depression of cardiac contractility [4, 42]. To summarize the

216

above, the reduction of pump function in supine position was caused by the increase

217

in afterload and the decrease in preload. Postural change significantly affects

218

hemodynamics in human [8, 17, 37-39] and animals [3, 15, 27]. In normal pregnant

219

women, cardiac output was increased by postural change from supine to lateral

220

position [17, 38, 39]. Compression and relief of the inferior vena cava by the gravid

221

uterus caused this physiological phenomenon. Furthermore, the decrease in cardiac

222

output was observed in not only pregnant women but also anesthetized dogs [27].

223

Nakao et al. suggested that the preload reduction in supine position resulted from the

224

compression of the inferior vena cava by intra-abdominal organs [27]. Hoffman et al.

225

also observed altered SV caused by postural change, which is associated with the

226

Frank-Starling mechanism [15]. If the compression of the inferior vena cava by intra-

227

abdominal organs occurs also in our study, the increase in afterload might also be

228

derived from the compression of the celiac artery. The reduction of SV along with

229

postural change is a physiological change, detected and assessed by TEE parameters.

230

Furthermore, the postural change influenced the modulation of the cardiac

231

autonomic nervous system [5, 25]. Cardiac vagal activity is greatest in right lateral-

232

recumbency, and the sympathetic tone is increased in supine position in normal

233

human subjects [5] and patients with congestive heart failure [25]. The finding that

234

HR was higher in supine position than in lateral-recumbency concurs with the canine

235

study made by Bornscheuer et al [3]. Consequently, CO was unchanged due to the

236

rise of HR compensating for the reduction in SV. The rise of HR along with postural

237

change related to the variation of several TEE parameters, such as SV and LVET, and 10

238

significant difference is not found in CO and LVETc among 4 postures. The effect of

239

HR should be considered when assessing cardiovascular function using TEE.

240

Longitudinal cranial-esophageal aorta long-axis-view and transverse middle-

241

esophageal mitral valve long-axis-view provide the same views and stable parameters

242

in any posture: however, some parameters are influenced by the physiological

243

changes in supine position.

244

A limitation of the study reported here is that no catheter examination was

245

performed for the accurate assessment of cardiac function. There may be some

246

differences between the actual values obtained using a catheter and the TEE

247

parameters. Therefore, the dogs in this study are all normal, so we cannot reveal

248

whether the healthy dogs are the same as the dogs with cardiovascular disease. Also,

249

we cannot exclude the possibility of the anesthetic effect on the TEE parameters.

250

Finally, only 1 breed of 1 particular body weight and chest conformation was assessed

251

in our study. The results might not be automatically transferable to dogs of different

252

breeds, age, body weights and chest conformations.

253

Although postural effects on TEE parameters must be considered, longitudinal

254

cranial-esophageal aorta long-axis-view and transverse middle-esophageal mitral

255

valve long-axis-view obtained using TEE provide useful information for monitoring

256

intraoperative hemodynamics in dogs.

257 258

REFERENCES

259

1.

260

Applebaum, R. M., Cutler, W. M., Bhardwaj, N., Colvin, S. B., Galloway, A. C., Ribakove, G. H., Grossi, E. A., Schwartz, D. S., Anderson, R. V., Tunick, P. A. and

11

261

Kronzon, I. 1998. Utility of transesophageal echocardiography duri ng port-access

262

minimally invasive cardiac surgery. Am. J. Cardiol. 82: 183-188.

263

2.

Belz, G. G., Aust, P. E., Doering, W., Heinz, M. and Schneider, B. 1982.

264

Pharmacodynamics of a Single Dose of Quinidine during Chronic Digoxin Treatment

265

- a Randomized Double-Blind Placebo and Sparteine Controlled Crossover Study.

266

Eur. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 22: 117-122.

267

3.

Bornscheuer, A., Mahr, K. H., Botel, C., Goldmann, R., Gnielinski, M. and Kirchner,

268

E. 1996. Cardiopulmonary effects of lying position in anesthetized and mechanically

269

ventilated dogs. J. Exp. Anim. Sci. 38: 20-27.

270

4.

Cacioppo, J. T., Berntson, G. G., Binkley, P. F., Quigley, K. S., Uchino, B. N. and

271

Fieldstone, A. 1994. Autonomic Cardiac Control .2. Noninvasive Indexes and Basal

272

Response as Revealed by Autonomic Blockades. Psychophysiology 31: 586-598.

273

5.

274 275

Chen, G. Y. and Kuo, C. D. 1997. The effect of the lateral decubitus position on vagal tone. Anaesthesia 52: 653-657.

6.

Cokkinos, D. V., Heimonas, E. T., Demopoulos, J. N., Haralambakis, A., Tsartsalis,

276

G. and Gardikas, C. D. 1976. Influence of Heart-Rate Increase on Uncorrected Pre-

277

Ejection Period Left Ventricular Ejection Time (Pep-Lvet) Ratio in Normal

278

Individuals. Brit. Heart J. 38: 683-688.

279

7.

de Figueiredo, L. F. P., Cruz, R. J., Silva, E. and Silva, M. R. E. 2004. Cardiac output

280

determination during experimental hemorrhage and resuscitation using a

281

transesophageal doppler monitor. Artif. Organs 28: 338-342.

282 283

8.

Doering, L. and Dracup, K. 1988. Comparisons of Cardiac-Output in Supine and Lateral Positions. Nurs. Res. 37: 114-118.

12

284

9.

285 286

Domenech, O. and Oliveira, P. 2013. Transoesophageal echocardiography in the dog. Vet. J. 198: 329-338.

10.

Fusini, L., Tamborini, G., Gripari, P., Maffessanti, F., Mazzanti, V., Muratori, M.,

287

Salvi, L., Sisillo, E., Caiani, E. G., Alamanni, F., Fiorentini, C. and Pepi, M. 2011.

288

Feasibility of intraoperative three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography in

289

the evaluation of right ventricular volumes and function in patients undergoing

290

cardiac surgery. J. Am. Soc. Echocardiogr. 24: 868-877.

291

11.

Garrard, C. L., Jr., Weissler, A. M. and Dodge, H. T. 1970. The relationship of

292

alterations in systolic time intervals to ejection fraction in patients with cardiac

293

disease. Circulation 42: 455-462.

294

12.

Gillebert, T. C., de Veire, N. V., De Buyzere, M. L. and De Sutter, J. 2004. Time

295

intervals and global cardiac function. Use and limitations. Eur. Heart J. 25: 2185-

296

2186.

297

13.

Gunn, S. R., Kim, H. K., Harrigan, P. W. J. and Pinsky, M. R. 2006. Ability of pulse

298

contour and esophageal Doppler to estimate rapid changes in stroke volume. Intens.

299

Care Med. 32: 1537-1546.

300

14.

Hirsch, R., Kilner, P. J., Connelly, M. S., Redington, A. N., St John Sutton, M. G.

301

and Somerville, J. 1994. Diagnosis in adolescents and adults with congenital heart

302

disease. Prospective assessment of individual and combined roles of magnetic

303

resonance imaging and transesophageal echocardiography. Circulation 90: 2937-

304

2951.

305

15.

Hoffman, J. I., Guz, A., Charlier, A. A. and Wilcken, D. E. 1965. Stroke volume in

306

conscious dogs; effect of respiration, posture, and vascular occlusion. J. Appl.

307

Physiol. 20: 865-877. 13

308

16.

Lee, J. H., Kim, J. T., Yoon, S. Z., Lim, Y. J., Jeon, Y., Bahk, J. H. and Kim, C. S.

309

2007. Evaluation of corrected flow time in oesophageal Doppler as a predictor of

310

fluid responsiveness. Brit. J. Anaesth. 99: 343-348.

311

17.

312 313

of recumbent postural change in late pregnancy. Clin. Sci. 32: 453-465. 18.

314 315

Lees, M. M., Scott, D. B., Kerr, M. G. and Taylor, S. H. 1967. The circulato ry effects

Li, Q. and Belz, G. G. 1993. Systolic-Time Intervals in Clinical-Pharmacology. Eur. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 44: 415-421.

19.

Loyer, C. and Thomas, W. P. 1995. Biplane Transesophageal Echocardiography in

316

the Dog - Technique, Anatomy and Imaging Planes. Vet. Radiol. Ultrasoun. 36: 212-

317

226.

318

20.

Madan, A. K., UyBarreta, V. V., Aliabadi-Wahle, S., Jesperson, R., Hartz, R. S.,

319

Flint, L. M. and Steinberg, S. M. 1999. Esophageal Doppler ultrasound monitor

320

versus pulmonary artery catheter in the hemodynamic management of critically ill

321

surgical patients. J. Trauma. 46: 607-611.

322

21.

323 324

Mazzaferro, E. and Wagner, A. E. 2001. Hypotension during anesthesia in dogs and cats: Recognition, causes, and treatment. Comp. Cont. Educ. Pract. 23: 728-737.

22.

McConahay, D. R., Martin, C. M. and Cheitlin, M. D. 1972. Resting and exercise

325

systolic time intervals. Correlations with ventricular performance in patients with

326

coronary artery disease. Circulation 45: 592-601.

327

23.

328 329 330

Miller, S. J. and Thomas, W. P. 2009. Coil embolization of patent ductus arteriosus via the carotid artery in seven dogs. J. Vet. Cardiol. 11: 129-136.

24.

Miller-Hance, W. C. and Silverman, N. H. 2000. Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) in congenital heart disease with focus on the adult. Cardiol. Clin. 18: 861-892.

14

331

25.

Miyamoto, S., Fujita, M., Sekiguchi, H., Okano, Y., Nagaya, N., Ueda, K., Tamaki,

332

S., Nohara, R., Eiho, S. and Sasayama, S. 2001. Effects of posture on cardiac

333

autonomic nervous activity in patients with congestive heart failure. J. Am. Coll.

334

Cardiol. 37: 1788-1793.

335

26.

Nagueh, S. F., Sun, H., Kopelen, H. A., Middleton, K. J. and Khoury, D. S. 2001.

336

Hemodynamic determinants of the mitral annulus diastolic velocities by tissue

337

Doppler. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 37: 278-285.

338

27.

Nakao, S., Come, P. C., Miller, M. J., Momomura, S., Sahagian, P., Ransil, B. J. and

339

Grossman, W. 1986. Effects of Supine and Lateral Positions on Cardiac -Output and

340

Intracardiac Pressures - an Experimental-Study. Circulation 73: 579-585.

341

28.

Perk, G., Lang, R. M., Garcia-Fernandez, M. A., Lodato, J., Sugeng, L., Lopez, J.,

342

Knight, B. P., Messika-Zeitoun, D., Shah, S., Slater, J., Brochet, E., Varkey, M.,

343

Hijazi, Z., Marino, N., Ruiz, C. and Kronzon, I. 2009. Use of real time three -

344

dimensional transesophageal echocardiography in intracardiac catheter based

345

interventions. J. Am. Soc. Echocardiogr. 22: 865-882.

346

29.

347 348

Pipers, F. S., Andrysco, R. M. and Hamlin, R. L. 1978. A totally noninvasive method for obtaining systolic time intervals in the dog. Am. J. Vet. Res. 39: 1822-1826.

30.

Porciello, F., Caivano, D., Giorgi, M. E., Knafelz, P., Rishniw, M., Moise, N. S.,

349

Bufalari, A., Fruganti, A. and Birettoni, F. 2014. Transesophageal echocardiography

350

as the sole guidance for occlusion of patent ductus arteriosus using a canine ductal

351

occluder in dogs. J. Vet. Intern. Med. 28: 1504-1512.

352 353

31.

Reich, D. L., Konstadt, S. N., Nejat, M., Abrams, H. P. and Bucek, J. 1993. Intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography for the detection of cardiac preload

15

354

changes induced by transfusion and phlebotomy in pediatric patients. Anesthesiology

355

79: 10-15.

356

32.

Ryan, T., Burwash, I., Lu, J., Otto, C., Graham, M., Verrier, E. and Spiess, B. D.

357

1996. The agreement between ventricular volumes and ejection fraction by

358

transesophageal echocardiography or a combined radionuclear and thermodilution

359

technique in patients after coronary artery surgery. J. Cardiothor. Vasc. An. 10: 323-

360

328.

361

33.

Saunders, A. B., Achen, S. E., Gordon, S. G. and Miller, M. W. 2010. Utility of

362

transesophageal echocardiography for transcatheter occlusion of patent ductus

363

arteriosus in dogs: influence on the decision-making process. J. Vet. Intern. Med. 24:

364

1407-1413.

365

34.

Schulmeyer, M. C., Santelices, E., Vega, R. and Schmied, S. 2006. Impact of

366

intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography during noncardiac surgery. J.

367

Cardiothorac. Vasc. Anesth. 20: 768-771.

368

35.

Silva, J., Domenech, O., Mavropoulou, A., Oliveira, P., Locatelli, C. and Bussadori,

369

C. 2013. Transesophageal echocardiography guided patent ductus arteriosus

370

occlusion with a duct occluder. J. Vet. Intern. Med. 27: 1463-1470.

371

36.

Singer, M. 2009. Oesophageal Doppler. Curr. Opin. Crit. Care 15: 244-248.

372

37.

Tanabe, K., Yoshitomi, H., Oyake, N., Asanuma, T., Ohta, T., Ishibashi, Y.,

373

Shimada, T., Morioka, S. and Moriyama, K. 1994. Effects of Supine and Lateral

374

Recumbent Positions on Pulmonary Venous Flow in Healthy-Subjects Evaluated by

375

Transesophageal Doppler-Echocardiography. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 24: 1552-1557.

376 377

38.

Ueland, K., Novy, M. J., Peterson, E. N. and Metcalfe, J. 1969. Maternal cardiovascular dynamics. IV. The influence of gestational age on the maternal 16

378

cardiovascular response to posture and exercise. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 104: 856-

379

864.

380

39.

381 382

various positions in pregnancy. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 82: 1312-1321. 40.

383 384

Vorys, N., Ullery, J. C. and Hanusek, G. E. 1961. The cardiac output changes in

Waddell, L. S. 2000. Direct blood pressure monitoring. Clin. Tech. Small Anim. Pract. 15: 111-118.

41.

Winterhalter, M., Simon, A., Fischer, S., Rahe-Meyer, N., Chamtzidou, N., Hecker,

385

H., Zuk, J., Piepenbrock, S. and Struber, M. 2008. Comparison of inhaled iloprost

386

and nitric oxide in patients with pulmonary hypertension during weaning from

387

cardiopulmonary bypass in cardiac surgery: A prospective randomized trial. J.

388

Cardiothor. Vasc. An. 22: 406-413.

389

42.

Winzer, A., Ring, C., Carroll, D., Willemsen, G., Drayson, M. and Kendall, M. 1999.

390

Secretory immunoglobulin A and cardiovascular reactions to mental arithmetic, cold

391

pressor, and exercise: Effects of beta-adrenergic blockade. Psychophysiology 36:

392

591-601.

393 394

FIGURE LEGENDS

395

Fig. 1. Longitudinal cranial-esophageal aorta long-axis-view was obtained with the

396

array angle set to 75-85°. The sample volume was set at 2 mm and was located in the

397

center of the ascending aorta between PA and Rau. LVPEP was the duration from Q

398

of ECG to left ventricular ejection onset. LVET was duration of the blood flow from

399

the left ventricular. PA: pulmonary artery; Rau: right auricle; LVPEP: left ventricular

400

pre-ejection period; LVET: left ventricular ejection time.

401 17

402

Fig. 2. Transverse middle-esophageal mitral valve long-axis-view was obtained with

403

the array angle set to 0°. The sample volume was set at 2 mm and was placed at the

404

tip of mitral valve. LA: left atrium; LV: left ventricle; MV: mitral valve; RA: right

405

atrium; RV: right ventricle; E: the peak early diastolic velocity; A: the peak atrial

406

systolic velocity.

407 408

Fig. 3-1. Relationship between SV and HR in all postures. A significant negative

409

correlation was found between SV and HR. SV: stroke volume; HR: heart rate.

410 411

Fig. 3-2. Relationship between LVET and HR in all postures. A significant negative

412

correlation was found between LVET and HR. LVET: left ventricular ejection time;

413

HR: heart rate.

414

18

FIG. 1

FIG. 2

FIG. 3-1

FIG. 3-2

Table 1. Mean ± SD values for the aortic flow parameters obtained from longitudinal cranial-esophageal aorta long-axis-view in 4 postures (n = 12)

Posture Left lateralRight lateralVariable Supine position Prone position recumbency recumbency SV (ml) 14 ± 3 14 ± 2 13 ± 3 10 ± 3a,b) CO (l/min) 1.3 ± 0.3 1.3 ± 0.3 1.0 ± 0.3 1.2 ± 0.2 a,b) LVPEP (ms) 61 ± 5 59 ± 5 66 ± 9 72 ± 11 a,b) LVET (ms) 210 ± 9 212 ± 15 201 ± 20 185 ± 11 LVPEP/LVET 0.29 ± 0.03 0.28 ± 0.03 0.33 ± 0.06 0.40 ± 0.08a,b) LVETc (ms) 338 ± 21 337 ± 17 338 ± 29 335 ± 25 a,b) LVPEP/LVETc 0.29 ± 0.02 0.28 ± 0.02 0.31 ± 0.03 0.35 ± 0.04 SV: stroke volume; CO: cardiac output; LVPEP: left ventricular pre-ejection period; LVET: left ventricular ejection time; LVPEP/LVET: a ratio of PEP to ET; LVETc: HR-corrected LVET; LVPEP/LVETc: a ratio of LVPEP to LVETc. a) Significant difference with left lateralrecumbency (p