[Enter Presentation Name Here]

1 downloads 150 Views 481KB Size Report
Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility. Page 1. Concepts for ELIC- a High Luminosity. CEBAF based Electron-Light Ion Collider. Ya. Derbenev, B. Yunn ...
Concepts for ELIC- a High Luminosity CEBAF based Electron-Light Ion Collider Ya. Derbenev, B. Yunn, A. Bogacz, G. A. Krafft, L. Merminga, Y. Zhang Center for Advanced Studies of Accelerators

XX-th Russian Accelerator Conference BINP, Novosibirsk September 10-14 , 2006

Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility

Page 1

Outline ƒ Nuclear Physics Motivation / Requirements ƒ ELIC: An Electron-Light Ion Collider at CEBAF ƒ Achieving the Luminosity of ELIC ƒ Achieving Polarization in ELIC ƒ ELIC Parameters ƒ Advantages/Features of the ELIC Design ƒ R&D Required ƒ Summary Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility

Page 2

Nuclear Physics Motivation ƒ A high luminosity polarized electron – light ion collider has been proposed as a powerful new microscope to probe the partonic structure of matter.

ƒ Over the past two decades we have learned a great amount about the hadronic structure.

ƒ Some crucial questions remain open …

Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility

Page 3

CEBAF II/ELIC Upgrade - Science Science addressed by the second Upgrade: • How do quarks and gluons provide the binding and spin of the nucleons? • How do quarks and gluons evolve into hadrons? • How does nuclear binding originate from quarks and gluons? From A. W. Thomas at NSAC LRP implementation review (2005) Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility

Page 4

Nuclear Physics Requirements ƒ The features of the facility necessary to address these questions:



Center-of-mass energy between 20 GeV and 65 GeV with energy asymmetry of ~10, which yields Ee ~ 3 GeV on Ei ~ 30 GeV up to Ee ~ 7 GeV on Ei ~ 150 GeV



CW Luminosity from 1033 to 1035 cm-2 sec-1



Longitudinal polarization of both beams in the interaction region ≥ 50% –80% required for the study of generalized parton distributions and transversity



Transverse polarization of ions extremely desirable



Spin-flip of both beams extremely desirable

Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility

Page 5

ERL-based ELIC Design I on L i na c

and

pre-

boos ter

Electron Cooling

IR IR Solenoid

IR

3-7 3 -7 GeV electrons

Snake

30--150 30 150 GeV light ions

Electron Injector

CEBAF with Energy Recovery

Beam Dump Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility

Page 6

Challenges of ERL-based ELIC ƒ Polarized electron current of 10’s of mA is required for ERL-based ELIC with circulator ring. Present state of art ~0.3 mA. ƒ A fast kicker with sub-nanosecond rise/fall time is required to fill the circulator ring. Present state of art is ~10 nsecs. ƒ Substantial upgrades of CEBAF and the CHL (beyond the 12 GeV Upgrade) are required. Integration with the 12 GeV CEBAF accelerator is challenging. ƒ Exclusion of physics experiments with positron beam. ƒ Electron cooling of the high energy ion beam is required.

Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility

Page 7

A New Concept for ELIC Electron Cooling Snake

IR

30-150 GeV light ions

IR Snake

3-7 GeV electrons

Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility

Page 8

Polarized Electron Injection & Stacking J

Injector 3000 pulses 5μs

4ms*

1 mA

t J

Storage ring

t *4 ms is the radiation damping time at 7 GeV Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility

Page 9

Ion Complex “Figure-8” boosters and storage rings • Zero spin tune avoids spin resonances. • No spin rotators required around the IR. • Ensure longitudinal polarization for deuterons at 2 IP’s simultaneously, at all energies. Ion Collider Ring Collider Ring

spin Source Source

200 MeV CCL DTL RFQLinac

120 keV 3 MeV 50 MeV 200 MeV Pre-Booster Pre-Booster 3 GeV/c 3 GeV/cm C~75-100 C~75-100 m

Ion Large Booster 20 GeV Large Booster (Electron (CR)Storage Ring) 20 GeV

Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility

Page 10

Positrons! Generation of positrons: (based on CESR experience) ƒ Electron beam at 200 MeV yields unpolarized positron accumulation of ~100mA/min ƒ ½ hr to accumulate 3 A of positron current

Possible applications: ƒ e+i colliding beams (longitudinally polarized) ƒ e+e- colliding beams (longitudinally polarized up to 7x7 GeV) ƒ …..

Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility

Page 11

Positron Production at CEBAF injector Transverse emittance filter

10 MeV

5 MeV e+ Longitudinal emittance filter

converter

epolarized source

e-

15 MeV

dipole

e-

e-

e+

e+ 115 MeV

ee+

dipole

eunpolarized source

15 MeV

During positron production: - polarized source is off - dipoles are turned on

Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility

Page 12

dipole

Achieving the Luminosity of ELIC Ni Ne L= f *2 b 4πσ For 150 GeV protons on 7 GeV electrons, L~ 7.7 x 1034 cm-2 sec-1 compatible with realistic Interaction Region design. Beam Physics Issues

ƒ Beam – beam interaction between electron and ion beams (ξi ~ 0.01 per IP; 0.025 is presently utilized in Tevatron)

ƒ High energy electron cooling ƒ Interaction Region • High bunch collision frequency (f = 1.5 GHz)

• Short ion bunches (σ

z

~ 5 mm)

• Very strong focus (β* ~ 5 mm) • Crab crossing Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility

Page 13

3 THE ELIC LUMINOSITY CONCEPT The concept of ELIC luminosity has been established based on considerations of the beam-beam, space charge, IBS and EC 1. EC in cooperation with bunching SRF resonators provides very short ion bunches (5 mm or less ), thus design a correspondently short betastar 2. Reduction of transverse emittance by EC allows one to increase extension beam in the final focusing magnet, hence, reach a lower beta-star 3. Short bunches make it possible implementation of the crab-crossing colliding beams that allows one to eliminate parasitic beam-beam interactions 4. Reduction of charge/bunch increases beam stability against microwave interaction (electron cloud, in particular) 5. Large synchrotron tune ( exceeding beam-beam tune shift) eliminates the synchro-betatron non-linear resonances in beam-beam interaction 6. Flat beams (at fixed beam area) reduce IBS rate against EC 7. Equidistant fraction phase advance between four IPs of ELIC normalizes the critical beam-beam tune shift to one IP

Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility

Page 14

ELIC Parameters Parameter Beam energy Bunch collision rate Number of particles/bunch Beam current Cooling beam energy Cooling beam current Energy spread, rms Bunch length, rms Beta-star Horizontal emittance, norm Vertical emittance, norm Beam-beam tune shift (vertical) per IP Laslett tune shift (p-beam) Luminosity per IP, 1034 Number of interaction points Core & luminosity IBS lifetime

Unit

ERL

GeV GHz 1010 A MeV A 10-4 mm mm μm μm

150/7 1.5 .4/1.0 1/2.4 75 2 3/3 5/5 5/5 1/86 .04/3.4 .01/.086

-2

-1

cm s h

.015 7.7 4 24

Ring-Ring 150/7

100/5

30/3

.4/1.0 1/2.4 75 2

.4/1.1 1/2.7 50 2

.12/1.7 .3/4.1 15 .6

1/86 .04/3.4 .01/.086

.7/70 .06/6 .01/.073

.2/43 .2/43 .01/.007

.015 7.7

.03 5.6

.06 .8

24

24

> 24

Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility

Page 15

Stacking polarized proton beam over space charge limit in pre-booster To minimize the space charge impact on transverse emittance, the circular painting technique can be used at stacking. Such technique was originally proposed for stacking proton beam in SNS [7]. In this concept, optics of booster ring is designed strong coupled in order to realize circular (rotating) betatron eigen modes of two opposite helicities. During injection, only one of two circular modes is filled with the injected beam. This mode grows in size (emittance) while the other mode is not changed. The beam sizes after stacking, hence, tune shifts for both modes are then determined by the radius of the filled mode. Thus, reduction of tune shift by a factor of k (at a given accumulated current) will be paid by increase of the 4D emittance by the same factor, but not k2. Circular painting principle: transverse velocity of injected beam is in correlation with vortex of a circular mode at stripping foil

Stacking proton beam in pre-booster over space charge limit: 1 – painting resonators 2, 3 – beam raster resonators 4 – focusing triplet 5 – stripping foil

Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility

Page 16

Overcoming space charge at stacking Stacking parameters

Unit

Value

Beam energy

MeV

200

H- current

mA

2

Transverse emittance in linac

μm

.3

Beta-function at foil

cm

4

Focal parameter

m

1

Beam size at foil before/after stacking

mm

.1/.7

Beam radius in focusing magnet after stacking

cm

2.5

Beam raster radius at foil

cm

1

Increase of foil temperature

oK