Evaluation of corneal biomechanical properties

0 downloads 0 Views 649KB Size Report
[8] CH was also observed to be significantly lower in eyes with descemetorhexis with endothelial keratoplasty versus those in normal subjects. Descemetorhexis.
[Downloaded free from http://www.ijo.in on Thursday, December 25, 2014, IP: 27.124.7.14]  ||  Click here to download free Android application for this journal

Original Article Evaluation of corneal biomechanical properties following penetrating keratoplasty using ocular response analyzer Vanathi Murugesan1, Ravi Bypareddy1, Mahesh Kumar1, Dada Tanuj2, Panda Anita1 Purpose: To evaluate corneal biomechanical properties in eyes that has undergone penetrating keratoplasty (PK). Materials and Methods: Retrospective observational study in a tertiary care centre. Data recorded included ocular response analyzer (ORA) values of normal and post‑keratoplasty eyes [corneal hysteresis (CH), corneal resistance factor (CRF), Goldmann‑correlated intraocular pressure (IOPg), and cornea‑compensated intraocular pressure (IOPcc)], corneal topography, and central corneal thickness (CCT). Wilcoxon signed rank test was used to analyze the difference in ORA parameter between post‑PK eyes and normal eyes. Correlation between parameters was evaluated with Spearman’s rho correlation. Results: The ORA study of 100 eyes of 50 normal subjects and 54 post-keratoplasty eyes of 51 patients showed CH of 8.340 ± 1.85 and 9.923 ± 1.558, CRF of 8.846 ± 2.39 and 9.577 ± 1.631 in post-PK eyes and normal eyes, respectively. CH and CRF did not correlate with post‑keratoplasty astigmatism (P = 0.311 and 0.276, respectively) while a significant correlation was observed with IOPg  (P = 0.004) and IOPcc (P