Fighting witches and vampire in rice!

5 downloads 0 Views 7MB Size Report
Fighting witches and vampire in rice! Sowing time as a measure to regulate host plant-parasitic weed interactions in rain-fed rice production systems. Dennis E.
Fighting witches and vampire in rice! Sowing time as a measure to regulate host plant-parasitic weed interactions in rain-fed rice production systems. Dennis E. Tippe, Centre for Crop Systems Analysis - Wageningen University and Research, the Netherlands.

1

Background  In Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA), rice is an important cereal food crop and source of income.  Rice demand is growing at a rate of >6% annually. - population growth (4% annually) - urbanization - dietary shift  Rice production is increasing across SSA, but the continent still imports some 40% of its rice! 2

Background Constraints in rice production  In SSA, rice is produced in three main eco-systems:  upland rain-fed  lowland rain-fed  irrigated  In rain-fed eco-systems, rice production is constrained by:  drought  poor soil fertility  diseases  weeds 3

Background Constraints in rice production

 In SSA, farmers are losing

yearly half a million tons of rice because of parasitic weed infection

 Root parasitic weeds, connect to their host plant and:  Extract assimilates and

nutrients  Reduce photosynthetic rate

Rodenburg J. et al., 2016. Parasitic weed incidence and related economic losses in rice in Africa. Agriculture, Economics and Environment 235 (2016), 306-317

 Main parasitic weeds in rain-fed rice:  Striga spp. – witchweed (uplands)  Rhamphicarpa fistulosa – rice vampire (lowlands) 4

Parasitic weeds in rain-fed rice S. asiatica (witchweed)

Rhamphicarpa fistulosa (rice vampire)

 Obligate hemi-parasite  Cereal crops, wild grasses...  Free-draining uplands

 Facultative hemi-parasite  Cereal crops, wild grasses...  Water-logged lowlands

5

Parasitic weeds management constraints Few research focused on parasitic weeds in rain-fed rice; most focus was on maize and sorghum.

 With maize and sorghum, various management options were proposed: e.g,

 use of fertilizers  crop rotation  use of resistant varieties  weeding/herbicides

 Yet, few control strategies have been effective and adopted  Farmers need locally accessible and affordable strategies 6

Rationale: Developing affordable parasitic weed management strategies Rice production in Tanzania. Farmers’ hypothesis:

 Sowing time can be used to reduce parasitic weed infection in rice.

 However, late sown crops frequently face drought during grain filling, specially the traditional long duration varieties

 Experiment: sowing dates x rice varieties with different growth cycles

7

Treatments: Sowing dates x rice varieties To investigate the effect of sowing time on infection level and growth of S. asiatica and R. fistulosa, and of rice grain yield



Rice sowing dates:  Five sowing times (20 Dec – 15 Feb)  Two weeks intervals (14 days) used



3 rice cultivars (similar resistance level):

 NERICA-14 (short),  Supa India (medium/long)  Mwangulu and (long)  IR64 (short),  NERICA-L-20 (medium)  Supa India (long)

upland

lowland

8

Treatments: Sowing date x Variety  Experimental design  split-plot - rice variety on main plot  sowing date on sub-plot  5 replicates (75 plots in total)

 Artificial parasite seed infestation in 2012  Crop establishment and management:  rice seeds sown directly  rice gap filled (21 DAS) to 3 plants hill-1  fertilizer: N-P-K (20-10-10) at (30 DAS)

 Data: parasite number, biomass and rice grain yield

9

140 d

120 100

c c

80 60 40 20 0

d c

b

c b a

b b a

b

b

2013

50

2013 S. asiatica biomass (g m-2)

S. asiatica maximum numbers (plants m-2)

Results: S. asiatica

b

40 30

ab

ab

20 10

a

0

b

ab

a a a

n.s

a

a

S1 S3 S5 S1 S3 S5

S1 S3 S5 S1 S3 S5 S1 S3 S5

Mwangulu Supa India NERICA-14 Sowing time x Variety

Mwangulu Supa India NERICA-14 Sowing time x Variety

S1 S3 S5

 Parasite numbers and biomass decreased with later sowing -

in late sowing, Striga seeds returned to a state secondary dormancy 10

Results: S. asiatica 2013

2.5 b ab

2

Rice grain yield (t ha-1)

b ab

1.5

 Early sowings resulted in

b 1

lower rice yields.

ab ab

ab

a

a 0.5

a

b

 Short growth cycle variety

a

a

(NERICA-14) resulted in stable relatively high yields with delay in sowings.

-

0

S1

S3

S5

Mwangulu

S1

S3

S5

Supa India Sowing x Variety

S1

S3

S5

NERICA-14

11

 -

2012

70

c

b

60 50

c

a a

40

c

a

b b

30

a

20

a

a

10 0

-

S1

-

-

S3

S5

S1

S3

S5

S1

Supa India NERICA-L-20 Sowing time x Variety

S3 IR64

S5

2012

120 R. fistulosa dry weight (g m-2)

R. fistulosa maximum numbers (plants m-2)

Results: R. fistulosa c

100 80 60 b

40 ab

20 0

S1

a S2

S3 S4 Sowing time

S5

Parasite number and biomass increased with delay in sowing time. early sowing resulted in partial escape of parasite infection of the rice. 12

Results: R. fistulosa 9

2012

c

Rice grain yield (t ha-1)

8 7 6 5

 Early sowing times yielded

c c

4

ab ab

b

3 2

ab a

-

S1

a

-

S3

S5

Supa India

higher rice grain yields, because of lower infection rates.

a

1 0

b

b

S1

-

S3

S5

NERICA-L-20 Sowing time x Variety

S1

S3

S5

IR64

13

Conclusion  Sowing

time influenced parasite development and rice grain yield, but the effect was very different for the two ecosystems.

 In upland, with S. asiatica:  Sowing rice from two to four weeks after the onset of the rain was found to be optimal, as parasite infection decreased and rice grain yields increased.  Improved short-duration varieties can help to avoid risks of drought stress associated to late sowings.

 In lowland, with R. fistulosa  The best strategy is early sowing, as in this way parasite infection delays, resulting in low parasite infection and the highest rice grain yields 14

Thank you for your attention!  Acknowledgments: 

Financed by Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research through Science for Global Development (NWO-WOTRO;W01.65.327.00)



Additional funds was received from the CGIAR research programs funded by CCAFS and GRiSP

Jonne R.

Marc S.

Aad van A

Niels A.

Kayeke J.

Derek M.

Tippe, D. E

Daniel and Kamanda

Lammert B.

15