The publication by Housley et al. (1997) of a model for lateglacial recolonization of north- ern Europe opened a lively debate on this ques- tion (Blockley et al.
Hiatus or continuity? New results for the question of pleniglacial settlement in Central Europe THOMAS TERBERGER & MARTINSTREET * The authors present n e w dating evidence for a refined understanding of human presence in Central Europe between 23,000 and 14,000 RP. Key-words: central Europe, radiocarbon. Late Glacial Maximum
Introduction The publication by Housley et al. (1997) of a model for lateglacial recolonization of northern Europe opened a lively debate on this question (Blockley et al. 2000; Housley et al. 2000). A review of available radiocarbon dates for the Upper Palaeolithic suggested that the region was largely deserted by humans at around the Late Glacial Maximum sensu strictn (LGM: FT(:URE 1) of the last Cold Stage: ‘The AMS I4C data clearly indicate an hiatus in occupation in many of the regions of northern Europe’ (Housley et al. 1997: 35).The text makes clear that the ‘northern Europe’ of the model includes large areas of western central Europe north of the Alps and extending to the British Isles as the most northwesterly outlier of Europe. The postulated lateglacial reoccupation of Europe, with origins in southwestern Europe, apparently reached the upper Rhineland (the Kesslerloch site) in a ‘pioncer phase’ at c. 14,200BP, only reaching the British Isles after 13,000BP. The subsequcnt ‘residential phasc’, characterized by increased site density, would follow some f“-800 14Cyears later. Shortly after the above model was presented, new research in the Khineland suggested that the concept of a complete pleniglacial desertion of ccntral Europe was in need of revision. Excavation during the 1990s at the open-air loess site Wiesbaden-Igstadt (FIGURE 2) had uncovered the remains of a small camp of horse and reindeer hunters. Initial doubts as to the age of the site, due to unclear stratigraphy and inconsistent radiometric dating, were removed by a coherent series of AMS radiocarbon dates pro-
vided bj7 the Oxford Radiocarbon Accelerator LJnit (ORAIJ) (Terberger 1998; Pettitt eta].1998; Street & Terberger 1999). The six results lie between 17,820f240 BP (OxA-7500) and 19,320f240 BP (OxA-7502), with a mean value c. 1 8 , 7 2 0 HP, close to the older result (TABLE 1). They show that occupation can most plausibly be dated to a period shortly after the LGM. The lack of parallels for Igstadt in the Rhineland prompted the authors to examine the evidence for contemporareneous human presence in central and western Europe at a larger regional scale (Street & Terberger 1999). With the cooperation of R.E.M. Hedges and P.B. Pettitt (ORAU) it was possible to date samples from a number of sites, the results of which are presented and discussed by this paper. New dates for the Kastelhohle-Nord cave, northwestern Switzerland The Kastelhohle cave is one of a number of important Upper Palaeolithic stations concentratcd in thc neighbouring Kaltbrunnental and Birstal valleys (FICXJRE 2) in the Basel-Land Canton ofthe Swiss Jura (Sedlmeier 1998;Leesch 1993). The double cave entrance opens over a breadth of 2 3 m at an elevation of some 30 m above the valley floor. Excavation took place from 1948-1950 and in 1954 under the direction of T. Schweizer in cooperation with E. Schmid (Schweizer 1959). In the North Cave, a long trcnch extending from thc cave interior located three Palaeolithic cultural layers separated by sterile deposits (Schmid 1959).A Middle Palaeolithic level was
* Strccl, Forschungsbereich Altsteinzeit, RoiiiisLh-Germanisches Zentralmuseum, Schloss Monrcpos, D-56567 Neuwierl, ( k m a n y . iiijs.moiireposQrz-online.rle Terberger, Lcllrstuhl fur Ur- u n d Priihgeschichte. Universitit Greifswald, Hans-Fallad-a-Strasse 1,D-17487 Greifswald, Germany. terhergeBuni-greifswaid.de Received 19 September 2001, accepted 31 January ZUO2, revised 6 June 2002 i%NTlQLTITY 76 ( 2 0 0 2 ) : 691-8
692
4
THOMAS TERBERGER & MARTIN STREET
Badegoulien ancien 13
q?
21
zo
19
ia
17
(n= 6)
16
FIGURE I.
Kastelhiihle-Nord
(n= 3)
Calibrated age of sites discussed in the text shown against climatic data f r o m the Greenland ice
core GISP.2. LGM:
I
-28
23
22
21
20
19
18
23
22
21
20
1q
18
17
16
15
14
13
12
11
10
I?
76
15
74
73
12
7;
10
- 30
73
34
- 36 38 % 0 4
24
[ k a cilBC J
covered by a deep deposit of eboulis-rich loess a n d loam, itself overlain by a deposit of speleothem. A second archaeological layer was locatnd between this unit and a new overlying deposit containing cryogenic debris, above which followed the third, greyish-black cultural
Late Glacial &Iaxirnun~sensu stricto; GI2, GI1: Greenland Interstadials 2 a n d 1 . Culibrution using the CulPul prvgra in111e developcd by 0. Jiiris [KomischCkmanisches Zentralm u s e u m Mainz) and B. Weninger (Cologne Universig): http:// www.calpa1, d e
deposit. On the basis of the lithic assemblage and organic artefacts such as eyed needles, awls and projectile points, the uppermost cultural horizon was classified as Upper Magdalenian or ‘TypeE Magdalenian’ (Sedlmeier 1998;Leesch 1993: 162). This attribution provides a fermi-
HIATUS OR CONTINIJI'I'Y? THE QUESTION OF PLENIGLACIAL SETTLEMENT IN CENTKAL EUROPE
693
FKIJKE 2 . Mup of sites discussed in the text. The maximum extent of the Scandinavian and Alpine ice sheets at the LGM is shown schsmntically. Central Europe: 1 Wiesbaden-lgstadt; 2 Kastelhohle-Nord [Middlc Lcvclj; 3 Mittlere Klause bnrial; 4 *Gera-Zoitzberg;5 Grubgraben; 6 "Bockstein-Torle; 7 "Langmanncrsdorf; 8 Rinsliof-Speyer cranium
(now redated as Bronze Age. [* LGM date uncertain/unconfirnied.j France (SolutrGen re'cent): 9 Abri Fritsch: 10 Solutre; 11 Laugerie-Haute Ouest; 12 Coinhe Saunidrc; 1 3 Cuzoul a Vers. (Badegoulien ancien): 9 Abri Fritsch: 11 Laugcrie-Haute Est; 1 3 Ci1zoi11ri Vers; 14 Pegourie's.
nus ante queni for the underlying, middle cultural horizon which is of interest here. This Middle Horizon delivered a relatively poor assemblage of 260 lithic artefacts and some fragmented bones. The lithic assemblage is characterized by poorly standardized blade technology with a high proportion of flakes, which were often retouched into tools. Only two of the total of nine scrapers are classic blade scrapers, while one scraper on a thick flake resembles a carinated form. Another feature of the asscmblage is the total absence of abrupt backed or retouched bladelcts. Already in 1959, R. Bay had drawn attention to parallels between the Kastelhiihle-Nord
Middle Horizon and the early Magdalenian of western Europe (Bay 1959) (FKXJRE 3). This comparison was pursued more recently and J.-M. Le Tensorer (1986: 31) subsequently suggested affinities with the Magdalcnian I11 at Laugerie Haute. In an even more recent synthesis of the Swiss Magdalenian, the Kastelhohle-Nord Middle Horizon was defined as the 'Type A Magdalenian' and linked to the French Badegoulian, this being the now generally accepted term for what was once referred to as Magdalenian 0 and 1 (Leesch 1993, 155; Lc Tensorer 1998). The Badegoulian hypothesis could not be supported by two radiocarbon dates obtained in the 1980s of 13,990f150HP (B-4636)
THOMAS TERBERGER & MARTIN STREET
694
site
lab. no.
Solutreen recent A bri Fritsch 8d GrN-5499 Cuzoul a Vers 30
uncalibrated AMS date (BP)
19,180 f 2 3 0
Gif-6699
19,400 f 2 1 0
Ly-15 3 3
19,590 i 2 8 0
IV-9
OXA-489 OXA-752 OXA-753
19,450 f 3 3 0 19,490 +350 19,630 f 3 2 0
5 5 2 2
GrN-4442 GrN-4495 GrN-4605 GrN-4441
19,600 f 1 4 0 19,740 f 1 4 0 19,870 f l 9 O 20,000 f 2 4 0
Solutrk Combe Sauniere IV-1
IV-8
Laugerie Haute Ouest
western central Europe Wiesbaden-Igstadt
Gru bgraben A.L.1 A.L.2b A.L.3 A.L.2a A.L.2-4 A.L.4 A.L.2b A.L.4 A.L.4
Kastelhohle-Nord
UZ-3768 OXA-7500 OXA-7501 OXA-6809 OXA-6808 OXA-7406 OXA-7502
17,210fl35 17,820 f 2 4 0 18,220 +180 18,670 f 1 6 0 19,080 + I 6 0 19,200 + I 6 0 19,320 f 2 4 0
Lv-1825 Lv-182 1 Lv-18 1 0 Lv-1823 Lv-1 660 Lv-1 680 Lv-1 822 GrN-2 1893 GrN-2 1790
i6,800+280 17,350+190 18,030f270 18,070f270 18,170f300 18,4005330 18,620f220 18,820+160 19,270i80
OXA-9737 OXA-9739 OXA-9738
18,530 f 1 5 0 19,200 f 1 5 0 19,620 f 1 4 0
UCLA-1869 OXA-9856
18,200 f 2 0 0 18,590 f 2 6 0
Mittlere Klause
Badegoulien ancien Cuzoul a Vers 23 24
Gif-6370 Gif-6798
Laugerie Haute Est
18,300 f 2 0 0 18,400 f 2 0 0
Ly-972
18,260 f 3 6 0
5b 6
Ly-112 3 Ly-1124
17,280 +350 17,980 +150
9a
Ly-18 3 6
17,420 +390
18
Abri Fritsch Pggourik
and 7200k160 BP (B-4638) (Honeisen et al. 1993: 156).The clear deviation of the absolute dates from the expected age of the assemblage was considered to be due to contamination and it is probably this absence of reliable radiometric dates for the Kastelhohle-Nord Middle Horizon which has prevented it being generally recognized as evidence for a Badegoulian presence in central Europe ( e g by Housley et ul. 1997). Against this background it seemed important to attempt once again to date the Kastelhohle-Nord Middle Horizon assemblage by absolute methods. That this was finally successful is due to the efforts of J. Sedlmeier, whose systematic review of the entire assemblage enabled him to identify faunal material unaffected by consolidants, from which three samples carrying traces of human modification were selected for AMS dating. The results are quite consistent, with a mean age of 19,100 BP (TABLE l),and demonstrate conclusively a human presence in northwest Switzerland shortly after the LGM of the last glaciation. The burial at Mittlere Klause, Neuessing, Bavaria The importance of the Palaeolithic burial of a 30-40-year-old man from the Mittlere Klause cave in Bavaria has been recognized since its discovery in 1914, although the exact chronological context of the find has been the subject of some discussion (e.g. by Orschiedt 1999). The presence of foliate points in the lithic material recovered from the cave and the fact that the grave had been disturbed by an overlying Magdalenian level suggested a Solutrean context to the excavators, a n interpretation which is today of purely historical interest. Nevertheless, a conventional radiocarbon date of 18,200f200 BP (UCLA-1869), obtained during the 1970s (Protsch & Glowatzki 1974),suggested that the grave was indeed older than the Magdalenian. This interpretation has sometimes been criticized, most recently by B. Wiiller (1999: 53), who rejects the radiocarbon date and argues for an attribution of the grave to the Magdalenian. On the initiative of the authors a renewed dating of the skeleton was undertaken and an ochre-stained fragment of vertebra weighing c. TABLE1, Uncalibrated A M S 14C dates for archaeological sites occupied close to the LGM.
695
HIATUS OR CONTINUITY? THE QUESTION OF PLENIGLACIAL SETTLEMENT IN CENTRAL EUROPE
4
3-
I
5
6
7
8
9
FIGURE 3. Selected stone tools of the Badegoulian sites Wiesbaden-Igstadt (1-4) and Kastelhohle-Nord, Middle Horizon (5-9, after Bay 1959). 3 g was dated following the usual ORAU pretreatment. The correspondence at one standard deviation between the ORAU AMS result (OxA-9856) of 18,590 f 2 6 0 BP (table 1)and the UCLA date is close and, in the view of the authors, confirms a date for the Mittlere Klause burial close to the LGM.
The Badegoulian in western central Europe? The new radiocarbon dates presented here provide information on the human occupation of central Europe around the LGM which can be discussed only briefly here.l Wiesbaden-Igstadt, Kastelhohle-Nord Middle Horizon and the Mittlere Klause burial together demonstrate human presence in western central Europe between c. 19,500 and 18,000 BP. Calibration of the radiocarbon ages and their 1 The following delibcrations are presented in detail by a thesis (Hubilitutionsschrift) by T. Terberger (2001).
correlation with climatic data from Greenland ice cores suggests a (perhaps causal) relationship with Greenland Interstadial GI 2 (see WeiDmuller 1997;Joris & Weninger 1998; 1999), i.e. after the end of the LGM sensu stricto. Wiesbaden-Igstadt and Kastelhohle-Nord Middle Horizon reveal great similarities, not only in their chronological position but also in the recovered lithic assemblages. At both sites the production of regular blades is unimportant, whereas the use of flakes for the production of tools is common. Equally, both assemblages are characterized by the presence of ‘archaic’ elements, such as nosed and carinated end scrapers, while backed components are absent. At the Swiss site a retouched flake can be regarded as a ‘raclette’, while the German assemblage contains transverse burins. The most pertinent parallels for both sites appear to be assemblages of the French Bad6ggoulien ancienlEarly Badegoulian (e.g. Hemingway
696
THOMAS TERBERGER & MARTIN STREET
1980: 233; Trotignon 1984: 85), which suggests the presence of this technocomplex as far east as the Swiss Jura and the central Rhineland. The dates for the Mittlere Klause burial indicate human presence at this time even further to the East. Against this background a site in Thuringia known since the 1920s is of especial interest. A Palaeolithic locality on the Zoitzberg close to Gera was indeed already described by R. Feustel (1965) as early Magdalenian or Badegoulian, but has found little recognition in the subsequent literaturen2 There are no preserved organic remains which might enable absolute dating of the site, but in the light of the results from Wicsbaden-Igstadt and Kastelhohle-Nord Middle Horizon the authors feel that, on typological analogy, the Zoitzberg assemblage might indeed be provisionally referred to the Badegoulian, extending the range of this technocomplex as far as Thuringia (FIGURE 2). It seems that it is only a matter of time before further assemblages of this type are recognized in western central Europe.
French Late SolutreanISoliitrBen re‘rent (Bosselin & Djindjian 1997a). Values for this group fall in the 20th millennium BP and are very consistent, irrespective of whether they are conventional dates or, as in the case of Combe SauniBre, AMS results (TABLE1).In addition, it can be seen that the dates for the Late Solutrean and the Early Badegoulian are mutually exclusive; the central European dates straddle the divide between them. In summary, the authors believe that both of the central European sites assigned here to the Badegoulian are at least as old as and, on the present evidence, probably older than, the Early Badegoulian sites in France, which makes the scenario of a Badegoulian expansion into central Europe from the west appear unlikely If we look to the east, the main phase of occupation at the site of Grubgraben in Lower Austria begins with Level 4 at c. 18,860 BP (Damblon et al. 1996: 185; Einwagerer & Kiifer 1998).Both this mean value of all radiocarbon dates and the oldest date at Grubgraben (19,2703330 BP: GrN21790) are very similar to those from WiesbadenIgstadt. The lithic assemblage from Level 4 (to East meets West - long-range European date only partially published) and that from contacts immediately after the LGM? It has been argued abovc that the distribution Levels 312 both have features also found in the Badegoulian (cf Montet-White 1990; Brandiner of industries typologically and chronologically similar to the Badegoulian can now be extended 1996). Blade production is less important and to western central Europe. However, a closer tools are commonly made on flakes, while nosed examination of the absolute dates of the sites and carinated end scrapers and also a number of in question opens u p a further point of inter- side scrapers give the assemblage a somewhat est. Radiocarbon dates for the Early Badegoulian archaic or ‘aurignacoid’ appearance. Characterin France (Bosselin & Djindjian 1997a) fall be- istic are multiple ‘star-shaped’awls or perforators tween 18,400?200 BP (Gif-6798: cuzoul 2 Vers and, although small retouched forms are present, classic backed bladelets appear to be rare. On 24) and 17,280k350 BP (Ly-1123: Abri Fritsch 5b) and are thus appreciably younger than both balance, the Grubgraben finds revcal great simithe oldest dates for Wiesbaden-Igstadt larities to Badegoulian assemblages and can be (19,320f240 BP) and the Kastelhohle-Nord interpreted as an eastern central European pheMiddle Horizon (19,620+140BP) and the mean nomenon equivalent to the latter. In this light values of all dates at the two sites (TABLE1). the description of the Grubgraben assemblage How can this tentatively younger age for the by the broad term ‘Epigravettian’ appears less than satisfactory. French Badegoulian be explained? In our present state of knowledge we can Methodological problems might be considered first. The French chronology is largely based propose contact and cultural exchange between on series of conventional radiocarbon dates and eastern central Europe and western Europe at new AMS results might possibly tend to give a a time (c. 19,000 BP) very soon after the LGM. higher age. This argument can be countered by This phase of contact appears to have been iniexamining radiocarbon dating results for the tiated by, and continued after, the Greenland Interstadia12 phase of warming (FIGURE 1).This can probably be equated with the Laugerie 2 A new analysis of the assemblage will be carried out Interstadial in France, where it is associated by M. KuDrier and T. Terberger.
HIATUS OR CONTINIJITY:, THE QUESTION OF PLENIGLACIAL SETTLEMENT IN CENTRAL EIJROPE
with the Late Solutrean. At Grubgraben this more humid episode is probably marked by the Level 4 cultural horizon (Haesarts 1990). It is arguable that eastern influences at this time contributed to the development of the Badcgoulian in western Europe.
Concluding remarks: neither hiatus nor continuity The authors have pointed out elsewhere [Street & Terberger 2000) that there are only few indications of a Gravettian presence younger than 25,000 BP in western central Europe. Two conventional radiocarbon dates between 23,000 and 20,000 BP from the Bockstein-Torle in BadenWiirttemberg should be controlled by new measurements. If the reliability of the dating is confirmed, an occupation of the Bockstein Torle at this time would indicate a sporadic presence of humans in western central Europe during the coldest phase of the last Glacial. This might find a parallel at Langmannersdorf in Lower Austria (Hahn 1977: 168) and would be broadly equivalent to the ‘Aurignacicn V (or ‘Protosolutr&n’) of southwestern France (Bosselin & Djindjian 1997a; 1997b). By contrast, the human calvarium from Binshof-Speyer in the Rhineland, until now assigned to the Pleniglacial on the basis of a radiocarbon date, has recently been shown by AMS dating to be a Bronze Age human and irrelevant to the present discussion (Terberger & Street 2001). AMS dates presented here for the Middle Horizon at Kastelhohle-Nord in the Swiss Jura and previously obtained results for WiesbadenIgstndt in the central Rhineland show that humans were present in western central Europe very soon after the LGM. Features of the lithic assemblages suggest a relationship with the French Early Badegoulian. On the evidence of the Zoitzberg site and the Mittlere Klause burial, it is suggested that the distribution of assemblages of Badegoulian type, or at least contemporary human presence, might be extcnded to Thuringia and Bavaria respectively. Similarities between Swiss, German and Austrian lithic assemblages dated by radiocarbon to shortly after the LGM and French Badegoulian industries suggest that by the time of Greenland Interstadid2 (LaugerieInterstadial)environmental conditions might have so far improved as to al-
697
low renewed contacts between eastern central and western Europe. The mean absolute age of the Swiss (Kastelhohle-Nord, Middle Horizon: 19,100BP), German (Wiesbaden-lgstadt: 18,720 BP) and Austrian (Grubgraben c. 19,000BP) sites is higher than that of the French Early Badegoulian sites and does not suggest that the central European assemblages can simply be regarded as a peripheral expansion of/derived from the Badegoulian. The chronological priority of the central European sites instead suggests that influences from eastern Europe could have played a formative role in the emergence of the western Badegoulian industries. After 18,000 BP there follows a renewed gap in the record of the human occupation of western central Europe, but the sporadic indications for a human presence in the 16th millennium BP (Pasda 1998),i.e. before the well-documented expansion of the Upper Magdalenian, will not be discussed here. In summary, and in a revision of previous views (Housley et al. 1997), we believe that the radiocarbon-dated archaeological record for western central Europe in the period 23,00014,000 BP demonstrates neither an extended hiatus in settlement nor continuous occupation. Humans showed great flexibility in their reactj ons to the extreme climatic fluctuations of the last glacial period and hunter-gatherer groups appear to have occupied (or at least traversed or exploited) regions deserted during the LGM as soon as improved conditions (e.g. Greenland Interstadial Z/Laugerie Interstadial) allowed (FIGURE 1).As a result, the period around and following the LGM was characterized not only by the generally accepted cultural isolation of eastern and western Europe, but also by phases of contact between them, across central Europe north of the Alps (Terberger 2001). These would inevitably lead to exchanges and influcncing of material culture and technology. At an earlier period, now documented by this paper, the direction of this influence on lithic technology appears to be from east to west, leading to the development of ‘rudimentary’, flakedominated industries, while during tho much better documented Latc Glacial ‘recolonization’ (cf.Housley et al. 1997) the direction of influence (Upper Magdalenian expansion) is clearly from the west to the east.
698
THOMAS TERBERGER & MARTIN STREET
Acknowledgements. T h e authors thank Dr Jiirg Sedlmeier [Himmelried) a n d the Kantonsarchaologie in Solothurn for their support of the prcsent project. Thanks are due to Prof. Dr G. G r u p e a n d Dr P. Schroter [Anthropologische
Staatssammlung Munchen) for authorization to take radiocarbon samples and fur helpful information. The authors thank M. Kiifiner, Halle University, for the reference to the Zoitzberg site. T h e authors thank Olaf Joris for help with FIGUW2.
References BAY,R. 1959. Werkzeuge und Kunst, in Die 'Kaslelhiihlc' i m Kaltbrunnental, Gemeinde Hinirnelried (Solothurn), Jahrbuch fur Solothurnische Geschichte 32: 13-50. BLOCKLEY, S.P.E., R.E. DOKAHUE &A.M. POLLARD. 2000. Rapid human response to Late Glacial climate change: a reply to Houslcy ef a]., Antiquity 74: 427-8. BOSSELIN, B. & F. DJINDJIAN. 1997a. Tine rAvision du Sohitreen de Laugerie-Haute et le prohlBmc dcs transitions Gravettien-Solutreen et SolutrBen-Badegoulicn en Aquitaine. Bulletin de lo Soci6li Pr6historiqiie Franpise 9 4 : 443-54. 1 9 9 7 h. L'Aurignacicn tardif un facies d e Transition du Gravctticn au SolutrBen, Prdhistoire EuropBenne 10:1117-
LE TENSORER, J.-M. 1986. Palaolilhikum und Mcsolithikum, in Chronologie. Archiiologische Daten der Schweiz, Antiqua 15: 25-33. Baslc. 1998. Le Paleolithique en Suisse. Grenoble: JBrBme Millnn. Prehishire d ' h r n p e 5, MONTET-WHITE, A. (ed.). 199U. T h e Epigruvnttion site of Grubgraben, Lower Austria: the 1986 nnd 1987 excuvutions. Liege: ERAIJL. ORSCIIIEDT, J. 19Y9. Manipulotionen or1 rrierischlichen Skelettresten. Tnphonornische Prozesse, Sckundarbestntfnngen oder Knnnibulismus? 'I'iihingen: Mo Vince Verl ag. Urgeschiuhlliche Mtrferialheftc 13, PHSDA, C. 1998. Oer Ueginn des Magdalenien in Mitteleuropa, 25. Arch aologisches Korrespondenzblatt 2 8: 175-90. URANDTNER, F. 1996. Zur geostratigrapliischen und kullurellcn PETTITT, P.B., M. STREET h T. TERBERGEK. 1998. Comments on Zuordnung der Palaolithstalion Grubgraben bei Kammern, the dating of Wildscheuer Cave, Archaeometrv Datelist NO, in J. Svoboda (cd.), Palaeolithic in the iMiddle DanZ t i , Archneometry40: 4 4 3 4 . ube Region (Festschrift Mima): 121-46. Brno: Spisy PROTSCH, R.R.R. & H. GLOWATZKI. 1874. Das ilbsolutc Alter dcs Archeologick6ho Ustavu AV CR. paliolithischen Skelettes aus der Mittleren Klause bei DAMRT.ON, F., P. HAESAKTS & J. VANDER PLICHT 1996. N e w datings Neuessing, Kr. Kelheiin in Bayern, Anthroi,ologi,~rhnr and consideratioris on the chronology of Upper Palaeolithic Anzeiger 34: 140-44. sites in the Great Eurasiatic Plain, Prehistoire Europkenne SEDLMEIER, J. 1998. Palaolithikuin u n d Mcsolilhikurn: Die Zcit 9: 177-231. dur Jager und Samniler, in J. Ewald & 1. 'I'auber (ed.], Tafort EINCZ'BCEREK, T. & B. KAFKK.1998. Eiue jungpal?iulithisclie Vcrgangenheif:29G-301. Basle: Wiese Verlag. Knochenflote aus der Slation Grubgraben bci Kammern, SCHMID, E. 1959. Die Schichtenfolge. in Die 'Kastelhnhle' im Nicdcrus lcrrcich, Archaologisches Korrespondenzblatt 28: Kaltbrunnental, Gemeinde Himmelried (Solothurn). Jahrbuch f u r Solothurnische Geschichte 32: fi-13. 21-30. PEUSTEL,R. 1965. Das Aurignacien vom Zoitzberg hei Gera, SCHWEIZER, T. 1959. Einleitung, in Die 'Kastelhohle' i m Kaltbrunnental, Gemeindn Himmelried [Solothiirn), Alt-Thuringen 8: 15-39. HAES.RTS,P. 1990. Stratigraphy of the Grubgraben loess SRjuhrbuch f o r Solothurnischp C;eschichte 92: 3-5. quence, in Montet-White (ed.): 15-36. %REET, M. & T. TEmERGFX. 1999. Thc last Phiiglaciad tuid the huHAHN,J. 1977. Aurignacien. Das Zltere Jungpalaolithikum in m m settlement of Central Europe: new information 'from the Khineland site of Wieshaden-Igstadt, Antiquity 73: 2 5 S 7 2 . Millel- und Osteuropa, Fundarnenta AS. Kiiln - Wien: Bijlil~i~i Vcrlag. 2000. The German Upper Palaeolithic 35,000-15,000 BF. New HEMIPIGWAY, M.1'. 1980. The Initial Magdalenian in France. dates and insights with emphasis on the Rhineland, in Oxford: British Archaeological Reports. International series W. Roebroeks, M. Mussi, J. Svoboda & K. Fennema (ed.), Hunters of the Golden Age. Papers from the European SYO. Science Foundation Colloquium at Pavlov: 281-98. Leiden: HONEISEN, M., D. UESCH & J.-M. LC TLNSORXR. 1YY3. Die Schweiz 1Jniversity of Leiden. t w i n Pnldolithikurn his z u m Mittrlolter I. Rasle: TERRERGER, T. 1998. Sicdluogsspuren zwisrhen 20.11011 iind Schweizerischc Gcscllschaft fiir Ur- und Fruhgcschichtc. 16,000 B.l? am Mittelrhcin. Gurmuniu 76: 403-37. HOL-SLEY, R.A.. C.S. GAMBLE, M. STREET& P. PETTITT.1997. 2001. Vom Gravetticn Zuni Magdalhicn in Mittclcuropil Radiocarbon cvidcncc for the Latcglacial h u m a n Aspekte der menschlichen Besiedlungsgeschichte in der recolonisation of Northern Europe. Proceedings of the Zeit urn das zweite Kaltemaximiim der letzten Eiszeit. Prehistoric Society 6:i: 25-54. HoLIsLEY,R.A.,C.S. G A M L I L ~ & & . P E ~ . ~ . ~ ~ ~ . ~ O O O . R ~ ~Habilitationsschrift, ~ ~ ~ ~ S . P . E . 1Jiiiversitat Greifswald. TERBERGER, T. & M. STREET.2001. Ncuc Forschungen zuni Blockley, 1 U . Donahue &A.M. Pollard, 'Kadicarbon cali'jungpalaolithischen' Menschenschadel von Hinshof bvi bration and Late Glacial occupation in northwest Europe', Speyer. Rheinland-Pfalz. Archdologisches Antiquity 74: 119-21. Korresportdmzhlntt 31: 33-7. JORIS,0 . & U.WENIXGER. 1998. Extension of the ''C calihratiun TROTIGNON, 1'. 1984. Les industries litliirpes Badegouliens. curve to ca. 40,000 cal BC by synchronizing Greenland ktudes siir 1'Abri Frilscli (Tndre), Collin PrPhistoire lXO/'bOice core records and North Atlantic foraminifera Supplement 19: 13-100. Paris. profiles: a comparison with UiTh coral data, RadiocarWEISSMULLER. W. 1997. Eine Korrelation der d'Y-Ereignissc dcs hon 4n(i]: 495-5114. gronlandischen Festlandeises mit den lnterstadialcn dcs 1999. Calenrlric age-cmiversimi of glacial radiocarbon data atlantischen und des kontinentalen Europa i m Zeitrauni at the transition from thc Middle Lo Upper Palaeolithic 4 5 bis 1 4 ka. QunrtQr47/48:89-111. i n Europe, Bullctin d c la Sncietb Prthistoriqiie WULW.K,R.1999. Die Ganzkiirperhestattungen des Magdalenien, Luxembourgeoise 1 8 (1996): 43-55. Universitatsforsch11 ngen znrpriihistorische~iArchuologie LEESCH, D. 1993. Das spate Jungpalaolithikum. Zeitlicher Rahmen 57. Bonn. und Fundinventare, in Honeisen et al: 153-64. ~
