Nov 7, 2013 - Banas river basin falls in Udaipur district of. Rajasthan, India. The total area of the Banas river basin is 702.55 sq.km. The study area is.
Journal of Environmental Research And Development
J. Environ. Res. Develop. Vol. 8 No. 2, October-December 2013
HYDROCHEMISTRY AND QUALITY ASSESSMENT OF GROUNDWATER IN BANAS RIVER BASIN, RAJASTHAN, INDIA Ali Syed Ahmad and Khan Nazia* Department of Geology, Aligarh Muslim University, Aligarh (INDIA)
Received July 05, 2013
Accepted November 07, 2013
ABSTRACT The problems of water quality have become more serious than the quantity, as the environmental problems are getting more serious day by day in different parts of the world. A various number of factors like soil, geology, sewage disposal, effluents and other environmental conditions in which the water tends to stay or move and interact with ground and biological characteristics. This greatly influences the groundwater quality of an area. The Banas river basin occupying an area of about 702.55 km2, falls in Udaipur and Rajsamand district of Rajasthan, India. The study area falls under the tropical climate. It has high temperature in summer and very cold in winter. The mean annual rainfall is 625 mm. The major sources of water supply in the study area for drinking and industrial uses are surface water bodies (lakes) and groundwater. Currently, groundwater (wells and handpumps) is the major source of irrigation. Assessment of groundwater quality and hydrochemical evolution of groundwater has been studied. Hydrochemical analysis has been carried out based on concentrations of Ca2+, Mg2+, Na+, K+, Cl-, SO42-, CO32- and HCO3-. Sodium Adsorption Ratio (SAR), percent sodium (% Na), Permeability Index (PI), pH, Total Dissolved Solids (TDS), Total Hardness (TH) and trilinear diagrams have been studied. SAR value ranges from 5.76 mg/L – 30.68 mg/L. Percent sodium value ranges from 64.76 – 94.26%. Permeability Index ranges from 33.46 – 99.58%. PH values ranges from 7.71 – 8.61. The value of hardness ranges from 76 – 1024 % . Na and PI results indicate that the groundwater in the basin is suitable for irrigation use. Thus, the present study reveals that the groundwater in the basin is of moderate to good quality and is suitable for all uses.
Key Words : Groundwater quality, Hydrochemical facies, Sodium Adsorbtion Ratio (SAR), Total Dissolved Solids (TDS), Permeability Index (PI)
INTRODUCTION Water is one of the valuable natural resources whose quality has vital concern for the human welfare.1 Groundwater is the main source of water that meets the agricultural, industrial and household requirements.2 The availability of groundwater depends upon the nature of rocks and their water bearing characteristics. Some of the research scientists have studied on groundwater and drainage morphometric analysis in different parts of India.3-6 Groundwater is one of the most valuable natural resource, which supports human health, socio-economic development and functioning of ecosystems.8-10 Geoscientists applied different methods for mapping and structural interpretation11-13, lithostratigraphical *Author for correspondence
study14, identification of unstable zone, tectonics net erosion rate15 and landuse/landcover change detection.16,17 Anthropogenic activities have exerted small to large scale changes on the hydrological cycle. Water quality plays an important role in promoting agricultural production and standard of human health. The over exploitation of groundwater has detrimentally affected groundwater in terms of the quality and quantity. Residential, municipal, commercial, industrial and agricultural activities affect groundwater quality.18
AIMS AND OBJECTIVES
Water quality data are utilized in the present study to analyse the groundwater chemistry. Hydro geochemical data are used in the analysis, 280
Journal of Environmental Research And Development
including Electrical Conductivity (EC), Total Dissolved Solids (TDS), Total Hardness (TH) and Sodium Adsorption Ratio (SAR), Percent sodium and Permeability Index (PI).
MATERIAL AND METHODS Study area Banas river basin falls in Udaipur district of Rajasthan, India. The total area of the Banas river basin is 702.55 sq.km. The study area is located lies between latitude 25000’ – 24 045’N and longitude 73 025’ – 73045 ’E falling in Survey of India toposheets No.45H/5 and 45H/9 on 1:50,000 scale (Fig. 1). It has tropical climate, high temperatures in summer and very cold in winters. The summers have a mean maximum of 40 0C and a mean
J. Environ. Res. Develop. Vol. 8 No. 2, October-December 2013
minimum of 25.80C, while the winter mean maximum is 220C and the mean minimum is 8.3 0C. Monsoon arrives in the month of July heralded by dust and thunderstorms. It annually receives around 637mm of rainfall. This scanty amount of rainfall makes more humid. The humidity reaches to the extent of 90 percent during the month of monsoons. The river Banas originating from the Khamnor hills of the Aravalli ranges (about 5 kms from Kumbalgarh) is one of the major rivers of the state which, in its entire course, flows through Rajasthan. It flows from Kumbalgarh towards the south upto Gogunda plateau and after cutting the Aravalli ranges at right angles; it flows through Nathdwara, Rajsamand and Railmagra.
Fig. 1 : Location map of the study area Eighteen types of geologic lithology namely, (1) biotite schist and calc biotite schist, (2) biotite schist and calc schist, (3) biotite schist and gneiss, (4) calc silicate rocks, (5) cherty breccias, (6) chloritic phyllites and meta tuff, (7) dolomite, (8) dolomitic marble, (9) epiclastic conglomerate, (10) feldspathic schist, (11) garnetiferous mica schist, (12) granite and gneiss, (13) hornblende schist, (14) meta siltstone and phyllite, (15) mica schist, (16) pegmatite and composite gneisses, (17) phyllite and mica schist, (18) quartzite are
found in the study area (Fig. 2). Study of the lithofacies and bedding characteristics and groundwater of Udaipur area, Rajasthan has been carried out.19,20 These litho units are soft and friable. Gneiss is grey to dark colored, medium to coarse grained rocks. Schist litho units are hard and compact, fine to medium grained and characterized by alternating bands of light and dark colored ferromagnesian minerals. Granite is grey colored, medium to coarse grained rock mainly composed of quartz, feldspar with biotite and hornblende as
281
Journal of Environmental Research And Development
minor constituents. Quartzites are grey, pink, pale and light green. Quartzites occupy west and south west part of the study area. The water samples were collected from the field at different locations (Fig. 3). 23 samples were collected in plastic bottles that had been thoroughly washed and rinsed with distilled water. The plastic bottles were closed tightly to avoid any spillage during transportation. Samples were analyzed for various physical parameters and chemical constituents following standard methods. Hardness and calcium was calculated by titration agents EDTA. Hardness (mg/L) Calcium (mg/L)
=
EDTA used x 1000 mL of sample =
EDTA used x 400.8 mL of sample
J. Environ. Res. Develop. Vol. 8 No. 2, October-December 2013
Chloride was calculated by titration against silver nitrate (mL x N of AgNO3) 1000 X Chloride 35.5 = (mg/L) mL of sample Magnesium was calculated by (y-x) 400.8 Magnesium = (mg/L) Vol. of sample x 1.645 y = EDTA used in hardness x = EDTA used in calcium Sulphate was calculated by gravimetric method (BaSO4 in mg) 411.5 Sulphate = (mg/L) mL of sample Sodium and potassium was calculated by Flame Photometer. The whole analysis was carried out in the geochemistry lab, Department of Geology, Aligarh Muslim University, Aligarh, India.
Fig. 2 : Geological map of Banas river basin showing water sample location 282
Journal of Environmental Research And Development
J. Environ. Res. Develop. Vol. 8 No. 2, October-December 2013
Fig. 3 : Photographs showing collecting water samples in the study area
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION Assessment of groundwater quality for irrigation use and hydrochemical evolution of groundwater has been studied. Hydrochemical analysis has been carried out based on concentrations of Ca2+, Mg2+, Na+, K+, Cl-, SO2-, CO32- and HCO3-. Sodium Adsorbtion Ratio (SAR), Percent sodium (% Na), Permeability index (PI) and Trilinear diagram have been studied (Table 1). The Piper Trilinear diagram (Fig. 4) is commonly used in water chemistry studies, which can show the percentage composition of
different ions. By grouping Na+ and K+ together, the major cations were displayed on the trilinear diagram. Likewise, CO32- and HCO3- are grouped resulting in 3 groups of the major anions. The cations and anions were plotted in left and right triangles as a single point. These points are then projected into the central diamond shaped area parallel to the upper edges of the central area. All these points in the diamond shaped area represent the total ionic distribution. For each water sample, a single point was obtained in the diamond shaped area, which represents the total ionic distribution.
Source : Data obtained from American geophysical union, Washington DC, USA
Fig. 4 : Chemical facies of groundwater of study area in Piper diagram 283
J. Environ. Res. Develop. Journal of Environmental Research And Development
Vol. 8 No. 2, October-December 2013
TDS Hardness (mg/L) SAR (mg/L)
% Na Na+ K+ Ca2+ Mg2+ CO32- HCO3- Cl – PI (%) (%) (mg/L) (mg/L) (mg/L) (mg/L) (mg/L) (mg/L) (mg/L)
EC SO42RSC micromhos (mg/L) (epm) /cm
pH
SW
8.61
248
1885
9.28
76.09
86.99
335
48
43.28
34.11
160
360
161.88
411.5
720
6.27
HP
8.16
184
1750
9.34
78.70
87.90
290
39
35.27
23.39
80
180
124.96
493.8
1220
1.93
3
Delwara lake Near Delwara lake Nathdwara
HP
8.17
172
1
10.96
81.64
88.82
330
37
24.04
27.28
100
130
122.12
493.8
680
2.02
4
Banas river
SW
8.45
240
1
9.74
76.97
82.83
345
41
25.65
42.88
120
120
159.04
576.1
640
1.16
5
Nichla Nohra
HP
7.97
180
1
10.71
80.85
85.41
330
33
6.41
39.95
180
60
79.52
411.5
920
0.38
6
Mundawala Chchota Bhanuja Bada Bhanuja
HP
7.85
1024
1
23.11
78.74
79.70
1700
81
94.58
191.99
80
110
17.04
1069.9
880
16.06
HP
8.07
308
1
17.65
83.97
83.37
710
54
84.96
23.39
0
0
522.56
576.1
1395
-6.16
HP
7.97
472
1
13.43
76.76
79.81
670
81
36.87
92.58
40
170
340.8
658.4
1815
-5.34
HP
7.98
244
1
8.64
74.67
82.96
310
37
19.23
47.75
60
190
90.88
493.8
2010
0.22
HP
8.09
464
1
12.74
81.49
76.59
630
528
57.71
77.96
100
30
389.08
823
1516
-5.47
11
Gaon guda Jhalo ki madaar Machind
HP
8.33
92
1
30.68
94.26
99.58
6670
42
19.23
10.72
100
180
198.8
658.4
705
4.44
12
Tula
HP
7.72
272
1
12.20
81.68
85.11
460
168
16.03
56.52
120
170
244.24
576.1
3260
1.33
13
Gogunda
HP
7.77
288
1
11.45
82.59
84.75
445
312
59.31
34.11
140
230
210.16
329.2
1005
2.66
14
Jaswantgarh
HP
7.7
404
1
7.94
68.31
73.59
365
61
41.68
73.09
40
190
215.84
740.7
4290
1.35
15
Tarpal
HP
8.43
368
1
7.51
67.81
68.66
330
46
64.12
50.67
80
20
218.68
576.1
5183
-4.39
16
Kagdi
Well
8
256
1
13.27
87.64
98.69
305
36
32.06
42.88
60
200
144.84
411.5
635
0.15
17
Semol
HP
7.66
312
1
11.56
87.05
89.53
335
272
41.68
50.67
60
110
187.44
493.8
1210
-2.45
18
Kamol
HP
8.14
76
1
14.57
79.71
81.83
630
27
22.44
4.87
60
150
235.72
493.8
760
3.2
19
Semod
HP
7.82
136
1275
5.95
64.76
33.46
18
32.06
13.64
20
150
59.64
411.5
1301
0.39
20
Padrara
HP
7.65
324
1
8.33
77.67
79.90
230 345
296
9.61
73.09
80
290
181.76
493.8
6215
0.92
S/N
1 2
7
284
8 9 10
284
J. Environ. Res. Develop. Vol. 8 No. 2, October -December 2013
Water type
Location
Journal of Environmental Research And Development
Table 1 : Hydrogeochemical characteristics of the water samples of the Banas river basin in mg/L
J. Environ. Res. Develop. Journal of Environmental Research And Development
Vol. 8 No. 2, October-December 2013
Sayera
HP
7.78
276
1
5.76
67.35
76.15
220
72
28.85
49.70
60
230
105.08
411.5
5960
0.23
22
Ranakpur
HP
7.81
324
1
7.97
70.59
82.15
330
48
9.61
73.09
20
470
127.8
329.2
1120
1.87
23
Beti nadi
SW
7.71
300
1599
6.28
65.98
77.48
250
31
24.04
58.47
140
300
79.52
329.2
2190
3.56
285
Journal of Environmental Research And Development
21
J. Environ. Res. Develop. Vol. 8 No. 2, October -December 2013
285
Journal of Environmental Research And Development
ranges from 76 – 1024. In USSL diagram, C 3 – S2, indicates high salinity – medium sodium type. This type of water can be used to irrigate salt tolerant and semi tolerant crops under favorable drainage conditions. In Wilcox diagram (Fig. 6), 16 water samples falls in permissible to doubtful category, 5 water samples falls in doubtful to unsuitable category whereas 2 samples falls in unsuitable category.
Sodium (alkali)
In cation facies all the samples are of sodium or potassium type. In anion fancies 8 samples are of sulphate type, 1 sample is of bicarbonate type, 1 sample is of chloride type and 12 samples are of no dominant type. SAR (Fig. 5) USSL value ranges from 5.76 mg/L – 30.68 mg/L. Percent sodium value ranges from 64.76 – 94.26. Permeability Index ranges from 33.46 – 99.58. pH values range from 7.71 – 8.61. The value of hardness
J. Environ. Res. Develop. Vol. 8 No. 2, October-December 2013
Salinity hazard Source : USDA, Agr. Handbook No. 60, Washington DC, USA
Fig. 5 : USSL diagram
\ Source : U.S. Dept. Agri. Circular No 969, USA
Fig. 6 : Wilcox diagram 286
Unsuitable
Doubtful to unsuitable
Good to permissible
Excellent to good
Sodium percent
Electrical conductivity (Micromhos/cm at 25 0C)
Journal of Environmental Research And Development
Permeability Index (PI) Permeability index has been used as an important parameter for determination of suitability for groundwater in irrigation use (Table 2). It is defined as: Na+ + ГHCO3- X 100 ( meq/L) PI (%) = (Ca2+ + Mg2+ + Na+) Percent sodium Another method for determination of suitability for agricultural use in groundwater by calculating
J. Environ. Res. Develop. Vol. 8 No. 2, October-December 2013
sodium percentage (Table 3) because sodium concentration reacts with soil to reduce its permeability Todd Percent Sodium is calculated as (Na+ + K+) 100 (meq/L) Percent = Sodium (%) (Ca2+ + Mg2+ + Na+ + K+) Sodium Adsorption Ratio (SAR) To determine the suitability for irrigation use, the sodium or alkali – hazard expressed in terms of Sodium Adsorption Ratio (SAR) was used (Table 4).
Table 2 : Quality of groundwater based on permeability index Water class Class - I
Sample location
Type of water
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 16, 17, 18, 20, 21, 22, 23.
Class - II
Very .good water quality >75% of maximum soil permeable. Good water quality 75% of maximum soil permeable.
Class - III
14, 15, 19.
Moderate water quality