Identification and Characterization of Three Orchid MADS-Box Genes of the AP1/AGL9 Subfamily during Floral Transition1 Hao Yu and Chong Jin Goh* Plant Growth and Development Laboratory, Department of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Science, National University of Singapore, 10 Kent Ridge Crescent, Singapore 119260, Republic of Singapore
Gene expressions associated with in vitro floral transition in an orchid hybrid (Dendrobium grex Madame Thong-In) were investigated by differential display. One clone, orchid transitional growth related gene 7 (otg7), encoding a new MADS-box gene, was identified to be specifically expressed in the transitional shoot apical meristem (TSAM). Using this clone as a probe, three orchid MADS-box genes, DOMADS1, DOMADS2, and DOMADS3, were subsequently isolated from the TSAM cDNA library. Phylogenetic analyses show that DOMADS1 and DOMADS2 are new members of the AGL2 subfamily and SQUA subfamily, respectively. DOMADS3 contains the signature amino acids as with the members in the independent OSMADS1 subfamily separated from the AGL2 subfamily. All three of the DOMADS genes were expressed in the TSAM during floral transition and later in mature flowers. DOMADS1 RNA was uniformly expressed in both of the inflorescence meristem and the floral primordium and later localized in all of the floral organs. DOMADS2 showed a novel expression pattern that has not been previously characterized for any other MADS-box genes. DOMADS2 transcript was expressed early in the 6-week-old vegetative shoot apical meristem in which the obvious morphological change to floral development had yet to occur. It was expressed throughout the process of floral transition and later in the columns of mature flowers. The onset of DOMADS3 transcription was in the early TSAM at the stage before the differentiation of the first flower primordium. Later, DOMADS3 transcript was only detectable in the pedicel tissues. Our results suggest that the DOMADS genes play important roles in the process of floral transition.
The transition to flowering, the first step in flower development, is triggered by a number of environmental and endogenous signals. In most plant species the transitional phase in the shoot apical meristem (SAM) can be generally divided into three stages: the shift from the vegetative to the inflorescence meristem, the maintaining of the inflorescence meristem, and the differentiation of the floral meristem from the inflorescence meristem (Meyerowitz et al., 1991; Ma, 1994). A variety of genes combined with external and internal cues are involved in the series of biochemical and physiological changes leading to floral induction (McDaniel et al., 1992; Bernier et al., 1993; Levy and Dean, 1998). Rapid progress is being made in elucidating the molecular mechanisms involved in the floral transition. Particularly, a number of MADS-box genes that function in various steps of the transition from vegetative to reproductive growth have been identified in different plant species. Plant MADS-box genes represent a large family of transcription factors that contain a highly conserved DNA-binding domain (MADS-box) and a second conserved domain (K-box), which is involved in protein-protein interactions (Schwarz-Sommer et al., 1990; Ma et al., 1991). Early 1
This work was supported by the Department of Biological Sciences, National University of Singapore. * Corresponding author; e-mail [email protected]
; fax 65– 779 –5671.
acting MADS-box genes during the transition to flowering, such as SLM4 and SLM5 from white campion (Hardenack et al., 1994), AGL8 from Arabidopsis (Mandel and Yanofsky, 1995), SaMADSA, SaMADSB, and SaMADSD from white mustard (Melzer et al., 1996; Bonhomme et al., 1997), and MdMADS2 from apple (An et al., 1999), are expressed early in the inflorescence meristem. Before the initiation of floral organ primordia, the regulation of floral meristem initiation and development involves many other MADS-box genes, such as AP1, CAL, AGL2, AGL4, and AGL9 from Arabidopsis (Mandel et al., 1992; Bowman et al., 1993; Flanagan and Ma, 1994; Gustafson-Brown et al., 1994; Kempin et al., 1995; Savidge et al., 1995; Mandel and Yanofsky, 1998), SQUA from snapdragon (Huijser et al., 1992), TM5 from tomato (Pnueli et al., 1994), FBP2 from petunia (Angenent et al., 1994), OsMADS1 from rice (Chung et al., 1994), and SaMADSC from white mustard (Melzer et al., 1996). Phylogenetic analyses of these genes show that almost all of the plant MADS-box genes that are involved in the floral transition belong to the AP1/AGL9 subfamily (Purugganan et al., 1995; Theissen and Saedler, 1996). Orchids are members of the family Orchidaceae, one of the largest families of flowering plants. Like other flowering plants, the development of orchid flowers begins with the floral transition and continues with the initiation and formation of floral organs. Much information concerning the orchid floral devel-
Plant Physiology, August 2000, Vol. 123, pp. 1325–1336, www.plantphysiol.org © 2000 American Society of Plant Physiologists
Yu and Goh
opment has been obtained through horticultural and physiological studies (Goh, 1977; Goh and Arditti, 1985). In contrast to a large amount of information concerning the molecular mechanism of floral development in several other flowering plants, very limited molecular studies have been undertaken on orchid floral development (Lu et al., 1993). In recent years in vitro techniques for micropropagation and flowering of orchids have opened new avenues of research into the flowering process (Lakshmanan et al., 1995; Goh, 1996). The shortening of juvenile phase from several years to only a few months and the obvious “landmark” events during floral transition are very helpful in studying the molecular mechanisms involved in the transition from vegetative to reproductive growth in orchids. In our effort to study the molecular mechanism of floral transition in orchids we have identified eight genes differentially expressed in the transitional shoot apical meristem (TSAM) during the switch from vegetative to reproductive growth by using mRNA differential display method (Liang and Pardee, 1992). One of these genes, otg7 (orchid transitional growth related gene), encodes a new MADS-box transcription factor of the AP1/AGL9 subfamily. Three new members of AP1/AGL9 subfamily were subsequently isolated with the otg7 probe from the cDNA library derived from the TSAM. The identification and characterization of three new members of the AP1/AGL9 subfamily for the first time provide some detailed information concerning the possible functions of the orchid MADSbox genes in the conversion from vegetative to reproductive growth. Understanding of the function of orchid MADS-box genes and those of orthologs from other plant species would contribute to the elucidation of molecular regulation during floral transition. RESULTS Isolation of a MADS-Box Clone Differentially Expressed in the TSAM
In our effort to identify genes in the shoot apical meristem associated with the transition from vegetative to reproductive development, mRNA differential display (Liang and Pardee, 1992) was performed to simultaneously detect genes differentially expressed in the vegetative shoot apical meristems (VSAMs; 6-week-old culture) and TSAM (12-week-old culture). One amplified band (otg7) around 660 bp in size appeared to be present only in the TSAM (Fig. 1). The differential expression pattern of otg7 was further confirmed by DNA dot-blot analysis and northern-blot analysis (data not shown). After sequencing, the gene was subsequently identified as a new member of the MADS-box gene family, most of which play important roles in the regulation of the flowering and flower development. To further study the functions of the MADS-box genes involved in the floral transition in 1326
Figure 1. mRNA differential display. Total RNA from VSAM (V) and TSAM (T) were treated with RNase-free DNase I and analyzed by differential display using T4 and P9 primers. Amplified products were separated on 5% (w/v) denaturing polyacrylamide gels under thermostatic conditions. The arrow indicates the gene (otg7) differentially expressed in the TSAM.
orchids, the otg7 clone was used to screen the cDNA library prepared from the 12-week-old TSAM. Isolation and Sequence Analysis of Three New Members of the AP1/AGL9 Subfamily
A total of 5 ⫻ 105 independent plaques were screened under non-stringent conditions. Fifteen positive clones were isolated and sorted into three distinct groups based on their restriction mapping and sequencing results. These results also indicated that clones of each group were coding for the same gene. Thus, the longest clones of each of the groups, designated DOMADS1 (accession no. AF198174), DOMADS2 (accession no. AF198175), and DOMADS3 (accession no. AF198176), were selected for further study. The sequence for DOMADS1, DOMADS2, and DOMADS3 each contains a full-length coding region as well as untranslated sequences on both ends. DNA sequence analysis also showed that the otg7 probe is almost identical to DOMADS1 gene except several base-pair mismatches on both ends of the probe. The deduced amino acid sequences of the three cDNAs are shown in Figure 2. All three of the cDNAs encode proteins that contain 56 conserved amino acid residues of the MADS-box domain at their N-terminal ends and the K-box domain located between residues 91 and 157 (92 and 158 for DOMADS2). The MADS-box regions among three genes share above 82% identities, and the sequence conservation in the K-box is between 50% and 65%. The comparison of the predicted protein sequences of DOMADS genes with other MADS-box genes in the database showed that DOMADS1 and DOMADS3 are most homologous to the AGL2 and AGL9 from Arabidopsis (Flanagan and Ma, 1994; Plant Physiol. Vol. 123, 2000
Orchid MADS-Box Genes during Floral Transition
Figure 2. Alignment of the deduced amino acid sequences of DOMADS1, DOMADS2, and DOMADS3. Black box, MADS domain; gray box, K-box region. Identical residues to the DOMADS1 reference sequence are indicated by dots, and gaps introduced to maximize the alignment are shown by dashes. The positions of amino acids are shown on the right.
Mandel and Yanofsky, 1998), DEFH72 and DEFH200 from snapdragon (Davies et al., 1996), and FBP2 from petunia (Angenent et al., 1992). The derived protein sequence of DOMADS2 shares strong homology with the maize ZAP1 (Mena et al., 1995) and the apple MdMADS2 (Sung et al., 1999). To determine the evolutionary relationship between DOMADS genes and the MADS-box genes from other plant species, a phylogenetic tree based on analysis of the MIK region was constructed (Fig. 3). The tree showed that DOMADS1 and DOMADS2 are new members of the AGL2 subfamily and SQUA subfamily (Purugganan et al., 1995; Theissen et al., 1996; Mu¨nster et al., 1997), respectively. DOMADS3 was clustered together with OSMADS1, OSMADS5, ZMM3, and ZMM8. This cluster is separated from the AGL2 subfamily for the first time as a separate gene clade, designated as the OSMADS1 subfamily. It is apparent from Figure 4 that the AGL2 and OSMADS1 subfamily can be distinguished from each other with the distinct characteristic amino acids of the second ␤-pleated sheet in the MADS-domain (Theissen et al., 1996). Genomic Organization of DOMADS Genes
DNA gel-blot analysis of orchid genomic DNA digested with several enzymes revealed that a large number of bands were produced with the probe containing the conserved MADS-box region of DOMADS1 (data not shown). This indicated that a high number of MADS-box genes are present in the orchid genome. To further investigate the genomic organization of the respective DOMADS genes in the genome, the 3⬘ end of each gene was prepared and used as a probe under high-stringent conditions for the southern blot of orchid genomic DNA digested with EcoRI, EcoRV, and XhoI (Fig. 5). Genomic DNA-blot analysis rePlant Physiol. Vol. 123, 2000
Figure 3. Phylogenetic tree of plant MADS-box genes in the AGL2, OSMADS1, and SQUA subfamilies. Orchid MADS-box proteins are indicated by asterisks. Genus names of respective species are given in the parentheses behind the corresponding protein names. Subfamilies generally representing monophyletic gene clades (Theissen et al., 1996) are indicated by brackets at the right margin. The subfamily of OSMADS1-like genes appears here for the first time as an independent clade. The horizontal branch length is proportional to the estimated number of base substitutions. The numbers next to the nodes indicate bootstrap values (⬎50%) in 100 replicates. 1327
Yu and Goh
Figure 4. Comparison of MADS-box domains between the genes in the AGL2 and OSMADS1 subfamilies. A consensus sequence (amino acids most frequently encountered at each particular position) is displayed, and only the deviations from consensus are listed in the individual sequence. The identical amino acids with consensus sequence are represented by dashes, and the missing data are indicated by blanks. The ␣-helix and two ␤-strands in the MADS-box domain are indicated respectively by the square dots and the lines above the consensus sequence. The characteristic amino acids of the OSMADS1 subfamily, which is distinguished from the AGL2 subfamily, are in black boxes.
vealed that a single, strong band was evident in most of the digests in all three of the blots, indicating the possibilities of the 3⬘-end regions acting as genespecific probes. In the DOMADS2 and DOMADS3 blots the weakly hybridizing bands in some digests indicated the possible presence of restriction sites within the corresponding orchid genomic DNA.
flank of the apical meristem. In the shoot apex (SA) of 15-week-old culture, expression of DOMADS1 was gradually increased in the inflorescence meristem and later in the floral bud (18-week-old culture). However, the transcript level of DOMADS3 was decreased somewhat in the inflorescence meristem but appeared higher in the floral bud. The DOMADS2 transcript was expressed early in the 6-week-old VSAM and continu-
Northern-Blot Analysis of Differential Expression of DOMADS Genes
Under our culture conditions, thin sections (1 mm) of protocorms produce 0.5-cm-long protocorm-like bodies (PLBs) within a month and continue to develop into shoot with the typical VSAM over the next 5 weeks. Most of shoots produce the typical TSAM with narrowing of two visible youngest leaves toward the apex after another 5 weeks in culture. Following this, the growth of the plantlet enters into the reproductive stage. After 15 weeks in culture, the terminal inflorescence has developed to more than 3 mm in length. By 18 weeks, the differentiated floral buds are mostly 2 to 4 mm in length. Northern-blot analysis was undertaken to investigate the different developmental stages at which DOMADS1, DOMADS2, and DOMADS3 were expressed during in vitro flowering. To avoid crosshybridization with other MADS-box genes, the 3⬘ end of DOMADS genes, which are the most divergent regions, were used as probes in all of the northern-blot analyses. As shown in Figure 6, both of the transcripts of DOMADS1 and DOMADS3 were first detected in the TSAM of 12-week-old culture. This is the stage in which the first flower primordium just differentiated on the 1328
Figure 5. Genomic DNA-blot analysis of DOMADS genes. DNA gel blots containing 15 g of genomic DNA digested with EcoRl, EcoRV, and Xbal were hybridized at high stringency with digoxigeninlabeled probes that were derived from the 3⬘-specific region of DOMADS genes. The size of the DNA markers is given on right in kb. Plant Physiol. Vol. 123, 2000
Orchid MADS-Box Genes during Floral Transition
ously expressed during the floral transition, and the transcript level reached a peak in the inflorescence meristem and remained high in the young floral buds (Fig. 6). Total RNA isolated from different tissues and different floral organs (Fig. 7) was used for further analysis of the expression of DOMADS genes. Northern analysis showed that all three of the genes were exclusively expressed in flowers, and no signals were detected in vegetative tissues (PLB, root, stem, and leaf) except for a very weak signal detected in stems when hybridized with the DOMADS1 probe (Fig. 8A).
Figure 6. Expression of DOMADS genes during the development of the orchid. The temporal scheme of main events during the orchid development is outlined above the northern results. The horizontal double arrows above the temporal scheme indicate the different developmental phases of the orchid. From left to right, total RNA (30 g per lane) was successively prepared from thin sections of protocorms (0-week length ⫽ 1 mm), PLBs (3-week length ⫽ 4–5 mm), VSAMs including the youngest leaf primordium (6-week length ⫽ 1.5 mm), TSAMs including bracts and the youngest leaf primoridium (9and 12-week length ⫽ 2 mm), inflorescence meristems including bracts and the youngest leaf primordium (15-week length ⫽ 3 mm), and floral buds (18-week length ⫽ 2–4 mm). Blots were hybridized with the specific digoxigenin-labeled probes described in “Genomic DNA-Blot Analysis.” The ribosomal RNAs stained by methylene blue indicate the amount of total RNA loaded in each lane.
Figure 7. A schematic median vertical section of the orchid flower bud showing the different floral parts. c, Column (fused structure of stigmas, styles, and stamens indicated by shaded region); o, ovary; p, petal; pd, pedicel; pl, pollinarium; r, rostellum; s, sepal; st, stigma. Plant Physiol. Vol. 123, 2000
Figure 8. Northern analysis of DOMADS genes in different orchid tissues (A) and in different floral organs (B). All of the blots were hybridized with the specific digoxigenin-labeled probes described in “Genomic DNA-Blot Analysis.” The ribosomal RNAs stained by methylene blue indicate the amount of total RNA loaded in each lane. A, The blots contain 25 g of total RNA extracted from different tissues in each lane. B, The blots contain 15 g of total RNA extracted from different mature floral organs in each lane. 1329
Yu and Goh
Figure 9. In situ localization of DOMADS1 expression in longitudinal sections of SA and developing floral buds. Sections hybridized with the DOMADS1-specific antisense RNA probe (a, b, d, f, and h) or the DOMADS1 sense RNA probe (c, e, g, and i) are shown. Hybridization signals were visualized using a blue filter in bright-field illumination (a–e, h, and i) or dark-field illumination (f and g). Expression of DOMADS1 in: a, the SA of 12-week-old culture in the apical region of the inflorescence meristem and the first floral primordium (magnification, ⫻100). b and c, The SA of 15-week-old culture in the inflorescence meristem and the developing floral primordium (magnification, ⫻80). d and e, The young developing floral bud of 17-week-old culture in all of the floral organ primordia and the basal floral meristem (magnification, ⫻60). f and g, The floral bud of 19-week-old culture mainly in the maturing pollinarium, the rostellum, and the column (arrowheads) (magnification, ⫻50). h and i, The mature flower of 23-week-old culture in the rostellum located below the pollinarium (magnification, ⫻20). ac, Anther cap; am, apical meristem; b, bract; c, column; fm, floral meristem; fp, floral primordium; im, inflorescence meristem; lp, leaf primordium; p, petal; pl, pollinarium; r, rostellum; s, sepal.
In mature flowers the expression of the three DOMADS genes produced different patterns (Fig. 8B). DOMADS1 was expressed in all of the floral organs, including pedicels, sepals, petals, column (gynostemium, a fused structure of stigmas, styles, and stamens), and ovaries. The transcript of DOMADS2 was only detectable in the column and ovary and that of DOMADS3 was only detected in the pedicel. 1330
In Situ Localization of DOMADS Genes in Shoot Apical Meristems and Floral Buds
The detailed spatial and temporal expression patterns of DOMADS genes during floral transition was assessed by RNA in situ hybridization. DOMADS1 transcript was first detected in the 12-week-old TSAM, in which the first floral primordium emerged Plant Physiol. Vol. 123, 2000
Orchid MADS-Box Genes during Floral Transition
Figure 10. In situ localization of DOMADS2 and DOMADS3 transcripts in longitudinal sections of SA and developing floral buds. Sections hybridized with the DOMADS2-specific antisense RNA probe (a, b, d, and e) and the DOMADS3-specific antisense RNA probe (f–h) or the DOMADS2 sense RNA probe (c) are shown. Hybridization signals were visualized using a blue filter in brightfield illumination (a, d, f, and g) or dark-field illumination (b, c, e, and h). Accumulation of DOMADS2 transcripts in: a, the SA of 11-week-old culture in the TSAM, both of the bract primordia and the last leaf primordium (magnification, ⫻100). b and c, The first floral primordium of 16-week-old culture in the central zone of the floral meristem (magnification, ⫻80). d and e, The floral bud of 18-weekold culture in the column primordium located at the bottom of the floral bud (magnification, ⫻30). Accumulation of DOMADS3 transcripts in: f, the SA of 11-week-old culture in the central zone of the TSAM and the region where the floral primordium would initiate Plant Physiol. Vol. 123, 2000
on one flank of the apical meristem (Fig. 9a). The expression of DOMADS1 was more concentrated in the apical region of the TSAM and the floral primordium than in the bract primordia. At a later stage, the DOMADS1 transcript was present throughout the inflorescence meristem and the floral primordium (Fig. 9, b and c). In the young, developing floral buds, DOMADS1 was almost uniformly expressed in all of the floral organs, including sepals, petals, column, and also the basal floral meristem (Fig. 9, d and e). At the later stage of the development of floral buds, DOMADS1 was expressed in all of the floral organs (Fig. 9, f and g). Relatively strong signals were detected in the maturing pollinarium (pollinium apparatus), rostellum (a platform bearing the pollinarium), and the column (Fig. 9, f and g). In the column of mature flower the strong expression level of DOMADS1 was only detectable in the rostellum located below the pollinarium as compared with the control hybridized with the DOMADS1-sense RNA probe (Fig. 9, h and i). No significant signals could be observed in the anther cap and the mature pollinarium (Fig. 9, h and i). In situ hybridization showed that the DOMADS2 transcript was detectable in the early 11-week-old TSAM at the stage when both of the bract primordia were well defined but before the first floral primordium was formed (Fig. 10a). The hybridization signals could be detected at a high level in the apical meristem, both of the bract primordia, and the last leaf primordium (Fig. 10a). Similar to the distribution of DOMADS1 transcript in the 12-week-old TSAM (Fig. 9a), DOMADS2 was also expressed in both of the apical meristem and the emerging floral primordium (data not shown). In the longitudinal section of the flower meristem, the accumulation of DOMADS2 transcript was mainly detected in the central zone of the meristem where the column primordium was developing (Fig. 9, b and c). In flower development, DOMADS2 was mainly expressed in the column primordium located at the bottom part of the floral bud (Fig. 10, d and e). The DOMADS3 transcript was also first detected in the 11-week-old TSAM at the stage when the first flower primordium had not emerged (Fig. 10f). The signal was strong in the central zone of the TSAM and the flanking region where the floral primordium would initiate, weak signals were also detectable in both of the bract primordia (Fig. 10f). In the progressively more developed inflorescence axis, DOMADS3 accumulated uniformly in the region below the floral meristem and the area flanking the procambium tissues under the inflorescence meristem. No expres(arrowhead; magnification, ⫻110). g and h, The SA of 16-week-old culture in the region below the floral meristem and the area flanking the procambium tissues below the inflorescence meristem (arrowheads; magnification, ⫻80). am, Apical meristem; b, bract; c, column; fm, floral meristem; im, inflorescence meristem; lp, leaf primordium; p, petal; pl, pollinarium; s, sepal. 1331
Yu and Goh
sion was observed in the floral meristem or the inflorescence meristem (Fig. 10, g and h).
In this study we have isolated and characterized three orchid MADS-box genes that are successively activated in the shoot apical meristem of Dendrobium Madame Thong-In during in vitro floral transition. Sequence comparisons of DOMADS1 and DOMADS2 with other MADS-box proteins have revealed that they are highly similar to the various members in the AGL2 and SQUA subfamilies (Theissen et al., 1996; Mu¨nster et al., 1997), respectively. Sequence analyses also indicate that DOMADS3 is a new member of the new cluster, OSMADS1 subfamily, separated from the AGL2 subfamily, as was suggested earlier (Theissen et al., 1996). In the MADS-box domain, the apparent difference between the AGL2 and OSMADS1 subfamily occurs in the second ␤-pleated sheet, which is the important component of the DNA-binding domain and oligomerization domain. Therefore, the sequence difference in the ␤-sheet indicates that the AGL2 and OSMADS1 subfamilies may have distinct DNA-binding specificity and the affinity for promoter elements (Huang et al., 1996; Liu et al., 1999). It is also interesting to note that, so far, all of the members in the OSMADS1 subfamily were isolated from monocotyledonous plants, indicating the possible functional diversification between the monocot and the dicot during the evolutionary development of flowering. Most of the MADS-box genes are involved in the regulation of the various steps of flower development including the transition from vegetative to reproductive growth. So far, in situ localization of the MADSbox genes involved in the floral transition has shown three different expression patterns in apical meristems. The first type of genes, which includes AGL8/ FRUITFULL from Arabidopsis (Mandel and Yanofsky, 1995; Gu et al., 1998) and SaMADSA, SaMADSB, and SaMADSD from white mustard (Melzer et al., 1996; Bonhomme et al., 1997), is expressed early in inflorescence meristems, but not in nascent floral meristems. Another type of genes, including the white campion SLM5 (Hardenack et al., 1994), the apple MdMADS2 (Sung et al., 1999), and the orchid DOMADS1 in this study, is expressed early in both of the inflorescence meristem and the emerging floral primordia. Unlike white campion and apple, orchid has an indeterminate inflorescence meristem from which floral meristems initiate on the flanks. It has been suggested that the expression of SLM5 and MdMADS2 in both inflorescence meristems and floral meristems may reflect the structural difference between the determinate and indeterminate inflorescence (Hardenack et al., 1994; Sung et al., 1999). However, our results show that the expression of the MADS-box gene (DOMADS1) in both meristems is also present in 1332
plants with indeterminate inflorescence. Thus, the structural difference of inflorescences may not be the main reason leading to this expression pattern. The third type of MADS-box genes involved in the floral transition expresses in nascent floral primordia but not in inflorescence meristems. These genes include AP1 and CAL from Arabidopsis (Mandel et al., 1992; Kempin et al., 1995), SQUA from snapdragon (Huijser et al., 1992), OsMADS1 from rice (Chung et al., 1994), and SaMADSC from white mustard (Melzer et al., 1996). In contrast to the three groups of MADS-box genes mentioned above, DOMADS2 and DOMADS3 appear to be novel MADS-box genes. The expression of DOMADS2 is strong in the last leaf primordium flanking around the TSAM (Fig. 10a), and the transcript situation at this point indicates the onset of transcription of this MADS-box gene may have started even in the VSAM. The result of RNA-blot analysis (Fig. 6) also shows weak expression of DOMADS2 in the typical VSAM (6-week-old culture). The acquisition of reproductive competence in plants is often marked by phase change (Poethig, 1990; Lawson and Poethig, 1995). In our orchid system the onset of transcription of DOMADS2 and its successive expression during early floral transition are accompanied by an obvious morphological change in the vegetative structures, which is the narrowing of two visible youngest leaves toward the SA. This observation enhances the inference that some genes identified as important in controlling the floral transition may also be involved in vegetative phase change (Levy and Dean, 1998). The expression pattern of DOMADS2, from early in VSAM and increases in later stages of flower development, suggests that DOMADS2 is one of the earliest regulatory genes during the transition to flowering. This pattern has not been previously demonstrated for any other MADS-box genes. The interesting aspect of DOMADS3 arises from the analysis of the change of its expression in the TSAM. Although the early expression of DOMADS3 is detectable in the central zone of the 11-week-old TSAM where the first floral primordium has yet to emerge (Fig. 10f), its transcript later disappears in both of the developing inflorescence meristem and the floral meristem (Fig. 10, g and h). Its expression is mainly in the region immediately below the floral meristem, where the tissues may later develop into pedicels (Fig. 10, g and h). Combined with the analysis of its expression pattern in mature flowers (Fig. 8b), our results suggest that DOMADS3 is a novel MADS-box gene that may function as a regulatory factor not only in the process of the early floral transition but also in the development of pedicel tissues. Our analysis of the different expression patterns of members in the AP1/AGL9 subfamily during floral transition is in agreement with the suggestion that Plant Physiol. Vol. 123, 2000
Orchid MADS-Box Genes during Floral Transition
the sorting of MADS-box genes into different families by sequence comparison may reflect the distinct functional roles these genes play in flower development (Purugganan et al., 1995; Theissen and Saedler, 1996; Theissen et al., 1996). Although the members in the AP1/AGL9 subfamily show diverse expression patterns during flower development, almost all of the MADS-box genes characterized so far during floral transition belong to the AP1/AGL9 subfamily. This indicates that members of AP1/AGL9 subfamily could act at the top of the proposed regulatory hierarchy of MADS-box genes controlling flower development (Mandel and Yanofsky, 1995; Rounsley et al., 1995). Furthermore, the distinct expression patterns in the SAM demonstrated by the early acting members of AP1/AGL9 subfamily during floral transition also suggest that a more subtle regulatory hierarchy of MADS-box genes may be operating for controlling the successive events in the shift from vegetative to inflorescence meristems, maintenance of inflorescence meristems, and the differentiation of floral meristems from inflorescence meristems. Our attempt to search for the possible correspondence between orchid MADS-box genes and the orthologs from other plant species suggests that there is no conservation in MADS-box genes function during floral transition in all of the flowering plants. In Arabidopsis, a number of early-acting MADS-box genes are organized to successively function in the restricted apical meristem region as floral transition proceeds. During the switch from vegetative to reproductive development, AGL8 RNA accumulates early to high levels only in the inflorescence apical meristem (Mandel and Yanofsky, 1995), whereas AP1 and CAL RNAs accumulate early only in the stage-1 flower primordia (Mandel et al., 1992; Kempin et al., 1995). This is followed by the onset expression of AGL2, AGL4, and AGL9 in stage-2 flower primordia (Flanagan and Ma, 1994; Savidge et al., 1995; Mandel and Yanofsky, 1998). Shortly thereafter, floral organ identity genes, such as AP3, PI, and AG, become active in the regulatory networks to specify identities of floral organs (Rounsley et al., 1995; Mandel and Yanofsky, 1998). Compared with the activities of Arabidopsis orthologs in floral transition, the earlyacting orchid MADS-box genes show two different patterns. First, the onset expression of DOMADS2 and DOMADS3 (especially for DOMADS2) is much earlier than AGL8, AP1, and CAL. This result shows that the earliest activity of MADS-box genes involving in the flower development can be traced back to the typical VSAM where the signals for floral transition may have been accumulated but the morphological change has yet to be developed. Second, the transcripts of DOMADS1 and DOMADS2 are accumulated in both of the inflorescence meristem and the floral meristem, whereas in Arabidopsis, the expression of AGL8 is limited in the former region and AP1 and CAL in the latter region. The distinct expresPlant Physiol. Vol. 123, 2000
sion patterns in two different plant species suggest that through evolution, different plant species may have set up their own regulatory systems to control the activities of MADS-box genes involved in the floral transition. The orchid flower is highly evolved with a column (parts of whorl 3 and whorl 4 of “normal” flowers) and an elaborate petal, the labelum. Anther development proceeds rapidly so that the pollen grains (in pollinia) are mature and functional at anthesis, whereas ovule development only starts after successful pollination. The DOMADS1 transcript is found in all of the floral organs and their primordia. The dramatically changed expression pattern of DOMADS1 in the pollinarium during the development of the floral bud could suggest the function of DOMADS1 as an early regulator in the formation of pollen mother cells. Our studies also show the specific expression of DOMADS2 and DOMADS3 in columns and pedicels, respectively, indicating their possible functions in the regulation of floral organ identity. It is interesting to note that almost all of the MADS-box genes involved in the regulation of floral transition also function in the later stages of flower development (Mandel and Yanofsky, 1995; Melzer et al., 1996; Bonhomme et al., 1997; Sung et al., 1999). The identification of DOMADS1, DOMADS2, and DOMADS3 as early-acting genes during floral transition is the first step toward the elucidation of the molecular mechanisms of floral transition in orchids. A fundamental question is how the early-acting MADS-box genes are triggered by environmental and/or endogenous signals to mediate or activate the subsequent series of activities leading to flower development. The present results contribute to the understanding of the molecular events regulating the switch from vegetative to reproductive growth in flowering plants. Combined with our previous horticultural and physiological studies (Goh, 1977; Goh and Arditti, 1985), the present study also provides a better understanding of the development of orchid flowers.
MATERIALS AND METHODS Plant Material The source of all of the plant materials was the selfpollinated F1 progenies of orchid (Dendrobium Madame Thong-In), a hybrid of Dendrobium Somsak ⫻ Dendrobium Suzie Wong. Thin-section explants, PLBs, and vegetative and transitional shoots were all maintained in modified liquid Knudson C medium (Knudson, 1946) supplemented with 2% (w/v) Suc, 15% (v/v) coconut water, and 5 m benzyladenine, and grown at 24°C under a 16-h photoperiod of 35 mol m⫺2 s⫺1 from daylight fluorescent lamps on rotary shakers at 120 rpm. Different tissues were dissected, frozen in liquid nitrogen, and stored at ⫺80°C. 1333
Yu and Goh
Nucleic Acid Isolation
cDNA Library Construction and Screening
Total RNA was isolated from various plant tissues according to the method of Murray and Thompson (1980) with some modifications. Frozen materials were ground in liquid nitrogen and extracted with the buffer containing 2% (v/v) ␤-mercaptoethanol, 2% (w/v) hexadecyltrimethylammonium bromide, 100 mm Tris [tris(hydroxymethyl)aminomethane]-HCl (pH 7.5), 20 mm EDTA, 2 m NaCl, and 1% (w/v) polyvinylpyrrolidone. The homogenate was incubated in a water bath at 65°C for 15 min with occasional shaking. After centrifugation, the aqueous phase was extracted at least twice with an equal volume of chloroform: isoamyl alcohol (24:1, v/v). Total RNA was precipitated by adding 0.25 volume of 10 m lithium chloride and kept overnight on ice. The pellet was washed twice with 70% (v/v) ethanol, dried, and dissolved in diethylpyrocarbonate-treated water. RNA purity and concentration were determined spectrophotometrically. The integrity of RNA was evaluated by separation on a glyoxal-agarose gel. Genomic DNA was isolated from leaves by the method described by Carlson et al. (1991).
Poly(A⫹) RNA was isolated by oligo(dT) column chromatography from total RNA extracted from the TSAM (12-week-old culture) at 2 mm in length. A cDNA library was constructed from the purified mRNA using the ZAPcDNA/GigapackIII Gold Cloning Kit (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA). The library was subsequently amplified and stored in a 7% (v/v) dimethyl sulfoxide solution at ⫺80°C. The amplified cDNA library containing approximately 500,000 plaques was screened under low-stringency conditions with the digoxigenin-labeled MADS-box domain sequence (otg7 probe). Plaque lifts were performed on duplicate nylon membranes (positively charged, Boehringer Mannheim, Basel) as suggested by the supplier. The plaque hybridization was performed in DIG Easy Hyb (Boehringer Mannheim) at 42°C for 2 h. Low-stringency washes were done twice at room temperature for 15 min with 2⫻ SSC and 0.1% (w/v) SDS, once at 42°C for 15 min with 0.5 ⫻ SSC and 0.1% (w/v) SDS. Immunological detection of the hybridization signals was carried out using the DIG Detection Kit (Boehringer Mannheim). Sequencing and Sequence Analysis
Differential Display Analysis Differential display analysis (Liang and Pardee, 1992) was performed using the Delta Differential Display Kit (CLONTECH Laboratories, Palo Alto, CA) according to the manufacturer’s recommendation. Total RNA samples from VSAMs (6-week-old culture) and TSAMs (12-week-old culture) were treated with RNase-free DNase I (CLONTECH Laboratories) to remove residual DNA. The treated total RNA (2 g each) was used for the first-strand cDNA synthesis. PCR amplification of cDNA products was performed according to the manufacturer’s instructions in the presence of [␣-35S]dATP by using 90 combinations of upstream “P” primers and downstream “T” primers supplied in the kit (CLONTECH Laboratories). Amplified PCR products were separated on a 5% (w/v) denaturing polyacrylamide gel in thermostatic conditions. Gels were dried under vacuum at 75°C for 40 min and exposed to x-ray films overnight. Differential displayed bands were excised, eluted in 50 L of sterile water at 100°C for 5 min, and re-amplified by PCR. The products were analyzed on agarose gels. Bands of the expected size were purified by using the QIAEXII Gel Extraction Kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA) and cloned into pGEM-T Easy Vector (Promega, Madison, WI). Heterogeneous inserts for each clone with the same size were distinguished from each other by arbitrary doubledigestion with RsaI and Sau3A. cDNA clones containing different inserts of the expected size were further selected by DNA dot-blot analysis according to the method of Corton and Gustafsson (1997). The identified clones were checked by northern-blot analysis of their expression patterns in VSAM and TSAM. One differentially expressed clone, otg7, was sequenced and used as a probe to screen the TSAM cDNA library. 1334
Isolated cDNA clones were sequenced using the Big Dye Terminator Cycle Sequencing Ready Reaction Kit (PerkinElmer Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA) and an ABI PRISM 377 DNA sequencer (Perkin-Elmer Applied Biosystems). Sequence data were compared with all of the known sequences in the National Center for Biotechnology Information (www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov) database with the BLAST search program (Altschul et al., 1997). Alignment of deduced amino acid sequences was made by using the Clustal W multiple sequence alignment program (version 1.7, June 1997). The sequences used for phylogenetic analyses included the MADS-box domain plus the 110 amino acids downstream of the MADS-box domain (Purugganan et al., 1995). Phylogenetic trees were constructed with the neighbor-joining algorithm by using the NEIGHBOR program in the PHYLIP program (Phylogeny Inference Package, version 3.57c, Department of Genetics, University of Washington, Seattle). The evolutionary distances were calculated by the PHYLIP program PROTDIS under the Dayhoff and PAM matrix. The statistical significance of trees was tested by bootstrap analysis using the SEQBOOT and CONSENSUS programs in the PHYLIP program. Southern-Blot Analysis Ten micrograms of genomic DNA was digested with different restriction enzymes, resolved on 0.7% (w/v) agarose gels, and then blotted onto nylon membranes (positively charged, Boehringer Mannheim). Blots were hybridized overnight with the specific digoxigenin-labeled DNA probes described below at 42°C in DIG Easy Hyb buffer (Boehringer Mannheim). These blots were washed twice with 2⫻ SSC and 0.1% (w/v) SDS for 5 min at room temperature, once with 0.5⫻ SSC and 0.1% (w/v) SDS for 15 min at room temperature, and finally once with 0.1⫻ Plant Physiol. Vol. 123, 2000
Orchid MADS-Box Genes during Floral Transition
SSC and 0.1% (w/v) SDS for 15 min at 65°C. Chemiluminescent detections were performed with CDP-star (Boehringer Mannheim) according to the manufacturer’s instruction, and the blots were then exposed against x-ray films for 5 to 30 min before development. The specific DNA probes were synthesized from 3⬘ end of MADS-box clones using the DIG-High Prime Labeling Kit (Boehringer Mannheim). Northern-Blot Analysis Total RNA was separated on glyoxal-agarose gels and transferred onto nylon membranes (positively charged, Boehringer Mannheim) by capillary blotting. The RNA blots were hybridized overnight at 50°C in DIG Easy Hyb buffer (Boehringer Mannheim) with the specific digoxigeninlabeled DNA probes used in DNA-blot analysis. The washing and detection of blots were performed as described in DNA-blot analysis. In Situ Hybridization For synthesis of antisense and sense probes, the 3⬘ ends of three cDNA clones were introduced into the pGEM-T Easy vector (Promega). The single-stranded antisense and sense RNA probes were transcribed in vitro with T7 or SP6 polymerase using the DIG RNA Labeling Kit (Boehringer Mannheim). The labeled probes were partially hydrolyzed to an average length of 150 bases (Angerer and Angerer, 1992). Tissues from shoot apical meristems or floral buds at different developmental stages were fixed in 3% (v/v) formaldehyde, 5% (v/v) acetic acid, and 60% (v/v) ethanol. The fixed materials were dehydrated and embedded in paraffin using standard methods. Longitudinal sections (10 m) were transferred onto poly-d-Lys coated slides. In situ hybridization was performed essentially according to the method of Sung et al. (1999). For colorimetric detection of hybridization signals, the slides were developed overnight with nitroblue tetrazolium chloride and 5-bromo-4-chloro3-indolyl phosphate solutions (Boehringer Mannheim) at room temperature. Sections were photographed on a microscope (TMS-F, Nikon, Tokyo) using bright or dark field optics. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS We are grateful to our colleagues in the department for their collaboration and assistance in this research. We thank Chooi Lan Lee for help in plant tissue culture and Dr. Hong Ma for discussions. H.Y. is supported by a postgraduate scholarship from National University of Singapore. Received January 11, 2000; accepted April 14, 2000. LITERATURE CITED Altschul SF, Thomas LM, Alejandro AS, Jinghui Z, Zheng Z, Webb M, David JL (1997) Gapped BLAST and PSIPlant Physiol. Vol. 123, 2000
BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res 25: 3389–3402 An G, Yu GH, Sung SK (1999) Characterization of MdMADS2, a member of the SQUAMOSA subfamily of genes, in apple. Plant Physiol 120: 969–978 Angenent GC, Busscher M, Franken J, Mol JN, van Tunen AJ (1992) Differential expression of two MADS box genes in wild-type and mutant petunia flowers. Plant Cell 4: 983–993 Angenent GC, Franken J, Busscher M, Weiss D, van Tunen AJ (1994) Co-suppression of the petunia homeotic gene fbp2 affects the identity of the generative meristem. Plant J 5: 33–44 Angerer LM, Angerer RC (1992) In situ hybridization to cellular RNA with radiolabeled RNA probes. In DG Wilkinson, ed, In Situ Hybridization. A Practical Approach: The Practical Approach Series. IRL Press, Oxford, pp 15–32 Bernier G, Havelange A, Houssa C, Petitjean A, Lejeune P (1993) Physiological signals that induce flowering. Plant Cell 5: 1147–1155 Bonhomme F, Sommer H, Bernier G, Jacqmard A (1997) Characterization of SaMADS D from Sinapis alba suggests a dual function of the gene: in inflorescence development and floral organogenesis. Plant Mol Biol 34: 573–582 Bowman JL, Alvarez J, Weigel D, Meyerowitz EM, Smyth DR (1993) Control of flower development in Arabidopsis thaliana by APETALA1 and interacting genes. Development 119: 721–743 Carlson LE, Tulsieram LK, Glaubitz JC, Luk VWK, Kauffeldt C, Rutledge R (1991) Segregation of random amplified DNA markers in F1 progeny of conifers. Theor Appl Genet 83: 194–200 Chung YY, Kim SR, Finkel D, Yanofsky MF, An G (1994) Early flowering and reduced apical dominance result from ectopic expression of a rice MADS box gene. Plant Mol Biol 26: 657–665 Corton JC, Gustafsson J (1997) Increased efficiency in screening large numbers of cDNA fragments generated by differential display. Biotechniques 22: 802–810 Davies B, Egea-Cortines M, de Andrade Silva E, Saedler H, Sommer H (1996) Multiple interactions amongst floral homeotic proteins. EMBO J 15: 4330–4343 Flanagan CA, Ma H (1994) Spatially and temporally regulated expression of the MADS-box gene AGL2 in wild type and mutant Arabidopsis flowers. Plant Mol Biol 26: 581–595 Goh CJ (1977) Regulation of floral initiation and development in an orchid hybrid Aranda Deborah. Ann Bot 41: 763–769 Goh CJ (1996) Production of flowering orchid seedlings and plantlets. Malay Orchid Rev 30: 27–30 Goh CJ, Arditti J (1985) Orchidaceae. In AH Halevy, ed, Handbook of Flowering. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, pp 309–336 Gu Q, Ferrandiz C, Yanofsky MF, Martienssen R (1998) The FRUITFULL MADS-box gene mediates cell differentiation during Arabidopsis fruit development. Development 125: 1509–1517 1335
Yu and Goh
Gustafson-Brown C, Savidge B, Yanofsky MF (1994) Regulation of the Arabidopsis floral homeotic gene APETALA1. Cell 76: 131–143 Hardenack S, Ye D, Saedler H, Grant S (1994) Comparison of MADS box gene expression in developing male and female flowers of the dioecious plant white campion. Plant Cell 6: 1775–1787 Huang H, Tudor M, Su T, Zhang Y, Hu Y, Ma H (1996) DNA binding properties of two Arabidopsis MADS domain proteins: binding consensus and dimer formation. Plant Cell 8: 81–94 Huijser P, Klein J, Lonnig W, Meijer H, Saedler H, Sommer H (1992) Bracteomania, an inflorescence anomaly, is caused by the loss of function of the MADS-box gene squamosa in Antirrhinum majus. EMBO J 11: 1239–1249 Kempin SA, Savidge B, Yanofsky MF (1995) Molecular basis of the cauliflower phenotype in Arabidopsis. Science 267: 522–525 Knudson L (1946) A new nutrient solution for germination of orchid seed. Am Orchid Soc Bull 15: 214–217 Lakshmanan P, Loh CS, Goh CJ (1995) An in vitro method for rapid regeneration of a monopodial orchid hybrid Aranda Deborah using thin section culture. Plant Cell Rep 14: 510–514 Lawson EJR, Poethig RS (1995) Shoot development in plants: time for a change. Trends Genet 11: 263–268 Levy YY, Dean C (1998) The transition to flowering. Plant Cell 10: 1973–1989 Liang P, Pardee AB (1992) Differential display of eukaryotic mRNA by means of the polymerase chain reaction. Science 257: 967–970 Liu L, White MJ, MacRae TH (1999) Transcription factors and their genes in higher plants. Eur J Biochem 262: 247–257 Lu ZX, Wu M, Loh CS, Yeong CY, Goh CJ (1993) Nucleotide sequence of a flower-specific MADS box cDNA clone from orchid. Plant Mol Biol 23: 901–904 Ma H (1994) The unfolding drama of flower development: recent results from genetic and molecular analyses. Genes Dev 8: 745–756 Ma H, Yanofsky MF, Meyerowitz EM (1991) AGL1-AGL6, an Arabidopsis gene family with similarity to floral homeotic and transcription factor genes. Genes Dev 5: 484–495 Mandel MA, Gustafson-Brown C, Savidge B, Yanofsky MF (1992) Molecular characterization of the Arabidopsis floral homeotic gene APETALA1. Nature 360: 273–277 Mandel MA, Yanofsky MF (1995) The Arabidopsis AGL8 MADS box gene is expressed in inflorescence meristems and is negatively regulated by APETALA1. Plant Cell 7: 1763–1771 Mandel MA, Yanofsky MF (1998) The Arabidopsis AGL9 MADS box gene is expressed in young flower primordia. Sex Plant Reprod 11: 22–28
McDaniel CN, Singer SR, Smith SME (1992) Developmental states associated with the floral transition. Dev Biol 153: 59–69 Melzer S, Apel K, Menzel G (1996) Identification of two MADS box genes that are expressed in the apical meristem of the long-day plant Sinapis alba in transition to flowering. Plant J 9: 399–408 Mena M, Mandel MA, Lerner DR, Yanofsky MF, Schmidt RJ (1995) A characterization of the MADS-box gene family in maize. Plant J 8: 845–854 Meyerowitz EM, Bowman JL, Brockman LL, Dreus GN, Jack T, Sieburth LE, Weigel D (1991) A genetic and molecular model for flower development in Arabidopsis thaliana. Development Suppl 1: 157–167 Mu¨nster T, Pahnke J, Di Rosa A, Kim JT, Matin W, Saedler H, Theissen G (1997) Floral homeotic genes were recruited from homologous MADS-box genes preexisting in the common ancestor of ferns and seed plants. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 94: 2415–2420 Murray MG, Thompson WF (1980) Rapid isolation of high molecular weight plant DNA. Nucleic Acids Res 8: 4321–4325 Pnueli L, Hareven D, Broday L, Hurwitz C, Lifschitz E (1994) The TM5 MADS box gene mediates organ differentiation in the three inner whorls of tomato flowers. Plant Cell 6: 175–186 Poethig RS (1990) Phase change and the regulation of shoot morphogenesis in plants. Science 250: 923–930 Purugganan MD, Rounsley SD, Schmidt RJ, Yanofsky MF (1995) Molecular evolution of flower development: diversification of the plant MADS-box regulatory gene family. Genetics 140: 345–356 Rounsley SD, Ditta GS, Yanofsky MF (1995) Diverse roles for MADS box genes in Arabidopsis development. Plant Cell 7: 1259–1269 Savidge B, Rounsley SD, Yanofsky MF (1995) Temporal relationships between the transcription of two Arabidopsis MADS box genes and the floral organ identity genes. Plant Cell 7: 721–733 Schwarz-Sommer Z, Huijser P, Nacken W, Saedler H, Sommer H (1990) Genetic control of flower development by homeotic genes in Antirrhinum majus. Science 250: 931–936 Sung SK, Yu GH, An G (1999) Characterization of MdMADS2, a member of the SQUAMOSA subfamily of genes, in apple. Plant Physiol 120: 969–978 Theissen G, Kim JT, Saedler H (1996) Classification and phylogeny of the MADS-box gene families in the morphological evolution of eukaryotes. J Mol Evol 43: 484–516 Theissen G, Saedler H (1996) MADS-box genes in plant ontogeny and phylogeny: Haeckel’s ‘biogenetic law’ revisited. Curr Opin Genet Dev 5: 628–639
Plant Physiol. Vol. 123, 2000