Impacts of seagrass food webs on marine ecosystems - IngentaConnect

9 downloads 0 Views 118KB Size Report
John F. Valentine, Kenneth L. Heck, Jr. and Anna M. Cinkovich. ABSTRACT. While most recent efforts seek to identify which group of producers (e.g., epiphytic.
BULLETIN OF MARINE SCIENCE, 71(3): 1361–1368, 2002

IMPACTS OF SEAGRASS FOOD WEBS ON MARINE ECOSYSTEMS: A NEED FOR A BROADER PERSPECTIVE John F. Valentine, Kenneth L. Heck, Jr. and Anna M. Cinkovich ABSTRACT While most recent efforts seek to identify which group of producers (e.g., epiphytic algae, macroalgae, or seagrasses themselves) plays the predominant role in individual seagrass meadows, few have considered the overall importance of all of these components in the flow of energy and nutrients on broader scales. Even though it is widely accepted that seagrass epiphytes can play an important role in controlling local food web productivity, recent results from understudied areas suggest that the importance of seagrasses themselves to marine food webs has been greatly underestimated. There is now ample evidence that grazing on seagrasses, especially in low latitudes, can be substantial. Similarly, the export of seagrass leaves has been correlated with high densities of invertebrates and fishes in both shallow waters and the deep sea. Since seagrass inhabitants (both consumers and their prey) vary greatly from site to site and region to region, our understanding of the importance of seagrasses to marine food webs lags far behind our understanding of such interactions in other habitats. Seagrasses often form extensive meadows that can be found along the coasts of every continent except Antarctica. As such, understanding the dynamics of food web interactions within these habitats, and the degree to which seagrass production is exported, is of considerable theoretical and practical importance.

The primary productivity of seagrass ecosystems is determined by a diverse group of plants that includes the seagrasses themselves, microepiphytic and macroepiphytic algae attached to the seagrass leaves, benthic microalgae and macroalgae living within the seagrass canopy, and phytoplankton. While the relative importance of these plants varies with location, it is clear that the majority of primary production in seagrass meadows comes from the attached algae and seagrasses (Heijs, 1984; Duarte, 1989; Buia et al., 1992; Gallegos et al., 1993; Frankovich and Zieman, 1994; Duarte et al., 1996; Cebrian et al., 1999; Lepoint et al., 2000). Both laboratory and field experiments have shown that, in the absence of predators, small grazers such as amphipods and gastropods (mesograzers) can limit epiphyte abundance and its accumulation on seagrass blades (Klumpp et al., 1992; Neckles et al., 1993; Williams and Rucklehaus, 1993; Mukai and Iijima, 1995; Jernakoff and Nielsen, 1997; Duffy and Hay, 2000; Heck et al., 2000). Their small size, high rates of growth, and low levels of structural and chemical feeding deterrents make algal epiphytes highly palatable for small grazers hiding within seagrass canopies (Orth and von Montfrans, 1984; Klumpp et al., 1989; Edgar, 1990a; Jernakoff et al., 1996; Bostrom and Mattila, 1999). The current view that the great productivity of seagrass food webs is based on algae rather than seagrass detritus represents a newly developed perspective in the study of seagrass food web dynamics. However, epiphytic assemblages vary greatly among locations, and in many areas are composed of organisms of varying palatability (some chemically and others structurally defended). Included are many kinds of algae (e.g., calcareous algae), fungi, ascidians, hydroids, organisms with calcareous exoskeletons (including barnacles and spirorbid polychaetes), as well as larger macroinvertebrates (e.g., amphipods, shrimps, crabs and gastropods) (Willcocks, 1982; Chernoff, 1985; Keough, 1986; 1361

1362

BULLETIN OF MARINE SCIENCE, VOL. 71, NO. 3, 2002

Borowitzka et al., 1990; Lavery and Vanderklift, 2000). The role of variation in the abundances of these organisms in determining consumer feeding preferences remains unknown. The overall importance of direct herbivory on seagrasses is also variable. There is clear evidence that living leaves are an important source of energy in many coastal food webs (summarized in Valentine and Heck, 1999). Investigators using a variety of methods have shown that living tissue is readily consumed by fishes in large quantities in parts of the Caribbean and Mediterranean Seas, and the Indian and Pacific Oceans. Yet seagrasses often remain uneaten in many areas. In part, the effects of human fishing and hunting can explain the spatial variability in seagrass grazing (Jackson, 1997; Lodge et al., 1998). These activities have significantly reduced the density of large vertebrate grazers (such as waterfowl, turtles and manatees) in both temperate and tropical environments. Additionally, the nutritional value of seagrass leaves may play an important role in determining grazing rates. The high cellulose and low protein content of seagrass leaves, coupled with the presence of chemical feeding deterrents, seem to limit seagrass consumption by some grazers (Bjorndal, 1979, 1980; Mazzella et al., 1992; Williams and Rucklehaus, 1993; Michot and Chadwick, 1994; McGlathery, 1995; Cebrian and Duarte, 1998). Herbivores, however, may have morphological adaptations or digestive capabilities that allow them to obtain nutrients and energy from marine vascular plants. For example, some fishes have low gut pH, allowing them to digest cellulose (e.g., Lobel, 1981; Montgomery and Targett, 1992), while other fishes, reptiles, and sirenians (i.e., manatees and dugongs) possess microbial symbionts capable of digesting cellulose in seagrass leaf tissues (Bjorndal, 1979; Thayer et al., 1984; Luczkovich and Stellway, 1993). Where data exist, the growth rates and secondary production of small seagrass associated invertebrates and fishes rival estimates reported from other marine communities (Coulon et al., 1992; Connolly, 1994; Edgar, 1990a,b; Fredette et al., 1990; Ferrell and Bell, 1991; Valentine and Heck, 1993; Edgar and Shaw, 1995). This means that there are large amounts of animal biomass in the intermediate trophic levels (e.g., isopods, decapods, gastropods and small fishes) (Heck, 1976; Orth and Heck, 1984; Bauer, 1985; Gambi et al., 1992; Greenway, 1995; Williams and Heck, 2001), and that the transfer of energy from seagrass consumers to higher order consumers should be quite high. In fact, seagrass habitats are sites of intense foraging by large predatory fishes (e.g., spotted sea trout, striped bass, jacks, and sharks) (Bell and Westoby, 1987; Heck and Weinstein, 1989; Hetler, 1989; Nojima and Mukai, 1990; Heck and Crowder, 1991; Burke, 1995; Edgar and Shaw, 1995). Surprisingly, there are few studies of the foraging patterns of predatory birds (e.g., ospreys, gulls, and herons) in seagrasses. The consumption of seagrass associated prey by transient predators suggests that productive seagrass communities subsidize the diets of consumers who spend a portion of their time foraging in seagrass habitats. SEAGRASS SUBSIDIES OF REGIONAL FOOD WEBS Ecosystems are open and generally extensive. Both the passive and active transport of materials inextricably link many ecological communities across boundaries via currents, larval drift and active foraging migrations. Movement of nutrients, detritus, prey, and consumers between habitats (i.e., spatial subsidies) can have major effects on food web productivity, especially in places with little or no in situ primary production, (e.g., caves, mountaintops, central ocean gyres, and the deep sea cf. Vetter, (1994, 1995, 1998); Polis

VALENTINE ET AL.: SEAGRASS IMPACTS ON MARINE FOOD WEBS

1363

and Strong, (1996); Persson et al., (1996); Rose and Polis, (1998)). In many locations, seagrass habitats are part of a greater landscape that is composed of both marine and terrestrial habitats, each linked to the other via the foraging patterns of consumers (both predators and herbivores), and the passive drift of seagrass detrital material. Where grazing on seagrass leaves is low, detrital seagrass leaves can be seasonally abundant (Thayer et al., 1977; Fitzhardinge, 1983; Harrison, 1989; Mazzella and Zupo, 1995; Mazzella et al., 1995; Cebrian and Duarte, 1998). Because detached seagrass leaves are carried passively by currents and waves (Robertson and Lucas, 1983; Hemminga and Nieuwenhuize, 1991), in some cases over extensive distances (Menzies and Rowe, 1969; Zieman, 1975; Wolff, 1979; Suchanek et al., 1985; Kenworthy et al., 1989; Lawson et al., 1993; Young et al., 1993), they may represent an important source of energy for other less productive marine habitats (Thresher et al., 1992; Christian and Luzcovich, 1999; Ochieng and Erftemeijer, 1999; Caddy, 2000). Such detrital inputs are likely to be important in areas where primary production is low and where habitat structure is limited. Accumulations of detrital material (in some cases a combination of seagrass leaves and kelp fronds) can support consumers in areas such as deep sea canyons or coastal beaches where they also provide an important refuge from predation for highly vulnerable macroinvertebrates (Lenanton, 1982; Lenanton et al., 1982; Lenanton and Caputi, 1989). The once great numbers of large fish consumers (e.g., groupers, jacks, snappers, sharks, and blue fin tuna), so widely reported in the earlier literature (cf Safina, 1995, 1998; Dayton et al., 1995), appear to have fed in multiple habitats to meet their nutritional needs. As such, natural marine ecosystems may once have been characterized by a high degree of cross habitat energy exchange (Eggleston et al., 1998; Valentine and Heck, 1999). If true, the productivity of seagrass communities has probably played an important role in determining the productivity of consumers in nearby habitats such as salt marshes, coral reefs and mangroves. Early studies of coral reef ecosystems, in fact, found that most reef fishes were carnivores and that carnivorous fish biomass was once 3–4 times greater than that of herbivorous fishes (Bakus, 1969; Goldman and Talbot, 1976; Parrish and Zimmerman, 1977; Grigg et al.,1984; Polunin, 1996). In addition, herbivorous fish biomass was usually much higher than plant biomass. Many reef consumers hide in structurally complex coral reefs to avoid predators and forage in nearby structurally simpler seagrass habitats (e.g., Randall, 1965; Ogden and Ehrlich, 1977; Ogden and Zieman, 1977; Zieman et al., 1984; Burke, 1995; McAfee and Morgan, 1996; Eggleston et al., 1998; Overholtzer and Motta, 1999). To date the importance of seagrass derived subsidies in determining the productivity of coral reef ecosystems remains unstudied (Randall, 1965). SUMMARY Seagrasses often form extensive meadows along the coasts of every continent except Antarctica. As such, understanding the dynamics of food web interactions within these habitats, and the degree to which seagrass production is exported, is of considerable theoretical and practical importance. Yet, as noted above, our understanding of seagrass food webs and the flow of energy and nutrients among seagrass inhabitants, and their export to other habitats, lags far behind our understanding of such interactions in other marine habitats. In part, this is because no one seagrass habitat is representative of seagrass habitats as a whole. While vegetated habitats have received substantial study in some heavily

1364

BULLETIN OF MARINE SCIENCE, VOL. 71, NO. 3, 2002

populated areas (e.g., the Chesapeake Bay and eastern Australia), fewer investigations have been conducted in more remote regions (e.g., the offshore areas of the West Coast of Florida or tropical Australia). Moreover, seagrasses occur in salinities ranging from oligohaline to fully marine. As a result, the fauna of seagrass habitats (both consumers and their prey) can vary greatly from site to site and region to region. Further complicating things is the recognition that coastal food webs have been dramatically altered by both inadequately managed coastal development and intense fishing pressure, leaving us to speculate as to how prehistoric seagrass food webs might have once been constructed. If we are correct, it will be necessary to develop a broader perspective that recognizes that both producer and consumer assemblages vary greatly among locations and that these differences are bound to alter the relative importance of the grazing and detrital pathways within seagrass habitats. Additionally, more studies of the connectivity between marine habitats should lead to a better estimate of the role of seagrass producers in supporting consumers in other habitats. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This work was supported by the DISPro program, a joint program between the Environmental Protection Agency’s EMAP program and the National Park Service (Grant No. 2350-7-0882), and by the University of North Carolina at Wilmington National Undersea Research Center (UNCW #9537). MESC Contribution Number: 328

LITERATURE CITED Bakus, G. J. 1969. Energetics and feeding in shallow marine waters. Int. Rev. Gen. Exp. Zool. 4: 275–369. Bauer, R. T. 1985. Penaeid shrimp fauna from tropical seagrass meadows: species composition, diurnal, and seasonal variation in abundance. Proc. Biol. Soc. Wash. 98: 177–190. Bell, J. D. and M. Westoby. 1987. Effects of an epiphytic alga on abundances of fish and decapods associated with the seagrass Zostera capricorni. Aust. J. Ecol. 12: 333–337. Bjorndal, K. A. 1979. Cellulose digestion and volatile fatty acid production in the green turtle, Chelonia mydas. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. 63a: 127–133. ____________. 1980. Nutrition and grazing behavior of the green turtle Chelonia mydas. Mar. Biol. 56: 147–154. Borowitzka, M. A., R. C. Lethbridge and L. Charlton. 1990. Species richness, spatial distribution and colonization pattern of algal and invertebrate epiphytes on the seagrass Amphibolis griffithii. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 64: 281–291. Bostrom, C. and J. Mattila. 1999. The relative importance of food and shelter for seagrass-associated invertebrates: a latitudinal comparison of habitat choice by isopod grazers. Oecologia 120: 162–170. Buia, M. C., V. Zupo and L. Mazzella. 1992. Primary production and growth dynamics in Posidonia oceanica. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 13: 2–16. Burke, N. C. 1995. Nocturnal foraging habitats of french and bluestriped grunts, Haemulon flavolineatum and H. sciurus, at Tobacco Caye, Belize. Environ. Biol. Fish. 42: 365–374. Caddy, J. 2000. Ecosystems structure before fishing. Fish. Res. 47: 101–102. Cebrian, J. and C.M. Duarte. 1998. Patterns in leaf herbivory on seagrasses: the importance of the specific leaf growth-rate. Aquat. Bot. 60: 67–82.

VALENTINE ET AL.: SEAGRASS IMPACTS ON MARINE FOOD WEBS

1365

_________, S. Enriquez, M. Fortes, N. Agawin, J.E. Vermaat and C.M. Duarte. 1999. Epiphyte accrual on Posidonia oceanica (L.) Delile leaves: implications for light absorption. Bot. Mar. 42: 123–128. Chernoff, H. 1985. The distribution and abundance of epifauna on the seagrass Thalassia testudinum Konig. MS Thesis. Florida State Univ., Department of Biological Sciences. 42 p. Christian, R. R. and J. J. Luczkovich. 1999. Organizing and understanding a winter’s seagrass foodweb network through effective trophic levels. Ecol. Mod. 117: 99–124. Connolly, R. M. 1994. A comparison of fish assemblages from seagrass and unvegetated areas of a southern Australian estuary. Aust. J. Mar. Fresh. Res. 45: 1033–1044. Coulon, P., M. Jangoux and P. Bulteel. 1992. Respiratory rate and assessment of secondary production in the holothuroid Holothuria tubulosa (Echinodermata) from Mediterranean seagrass beds. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 13: 63–68. Dayton P. K., S. F. Thrush, M. T. Agardy and R. F. Hofman. 1995. Environmental effects of marine fishing. Aquat. Conserv. Mar. Freshw. Ecol. 5: 205–232. Duarte, C. M. 1989. Temporal biomass variability and production/biomass relationships of seagrass communities. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 51: 269–276. ___________, M. A. Hemminga, and N. Marba. 1996. Growth and population dynamics of Thalassodendron ciliatum in a Kenyan back-reef lagoon. Aquat. Bot. 55: 1–11. Duffy, J. E. and M. E. Hay. 2000. Strong impacts of grazing amphipods on the organization of a benthic community. Ecol. Monogr. 70: 237–263. Edgar, G. J. 1990a. The influence of plant structure on the species richness, biomass and secondary production of macrofaunal assemblages associated with Western Australian seagrass beds. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 137: 215–240. _________. 1990b. Predator-prey interactions in seagrass beds. III. Impacts of the western rock lobster Panulirus cygnus George on epifaunal gastropod populations. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 139: 33–42. _________ and C. Shaw. 1995. The production and trophic ecology of shallow-water fish assemblages in southern Australia II. Diets of fishes and trophic relationships between fishes and benthos at Western Port, Victoria. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 194: 83–106. Eggleston, D. B., J. J. Grover and R. N. Lipcius. 1998. Ontogenetic diet shifts in nassau grouper: trophic linkages and predatory impacts. Bull. Mar. Sci. 63: 111–126. Ferrell, D. J. and. J. D. Bell. 1991. Differences among assemblages of fish associated with Zostera capricorni and bare sand over a large spatial scale. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 72: 15–24. Fitzhardinge, R. 1983. Comparison of the invertebrate faunas colonizing soft sediment in two different habitats. Bull. Mar. Sci. 33: 745–757. Frankovich, T. A. and. J. C. Zieman. 1994. Total epiphyte and epiphytic carbonate production on Thalassia testudinum across Florida Bay. Bull. Mar. Sci. 54: 679–695. Fredette, T. J., R. J. Diaz, J. van Montfrans and R. J. Orth. 1990. Secondary production within a seagrass bed (Zostera marina and Ruppia maritima) in lower Chesapeake Bay. Estuaries 13: 431–440. Gallegos, M. E., M. Merino, N. Marba and C. M. Duarte. 1993. Biomass and dynamics of Thalassia testudinum in the Mexican Caribbean: elucidating rhizome growth. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 95: 185–192. Gambi, M. C., M. Lorenti, G. F. Russo, M. B. Scipione and V. Zupo. 1992. Depth and seasonal distribution of some groups of the vagile fauna of the Posidonia oceanica leaf stratum: structural and trophic analyses. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 13: 17–39. Goldman, B. and F. H. Talbot. 1976. Aspects of the ecology of coral reef fishes. Biology and geology of coral reefs. Pages 125–163, vol III in O. A. Jones and R. Endean, eds. New York, Academic Press. Greenway, M. 1995. Trophic relationships of macrofauna within a Jamaican seagrass meadow and the role of the echinoid Lytechinus variegatus (Lamarck). Bull. Mar. Sci. 56: 719–736. Grigg, R. W., J. J Polvina and M. J. Atkinson. 1984. Model of coral reef ecosystem. III. Resource limitation, community regulation, fisheries yield and resource management. Coral Reefs 2: 23–27.

1366

BULLETIN OF MARINE SCIENCE, VOL. 71, NO. 3, 2002

Harrison, P. G. 1989. Detrital processing in seagrass systems: a review of factors affecting decay rates, remineralization and detritivory. Aquat. Bot. 23: 263–288. Heck, K. L., Jr. 1976. Community structure and the effects of pollution in sea-grass meadows and adjacent habitats. Mar. Biol. 35: 345–357. _____________ and M. P. Weinstein. 1989. Feeding habits of juvenile reef fishes associated with panamanian seagrass meadows. Bull. Mar. Sci. 45: 629–636. _____________ and L. B. Crowder. 1991. Habitat structure and predator-prey interactions in vegetated aquatic systems. Pages 281–295 in S. S. Bell, E. D. McCoy and H. R. Mushinsky, eds. Habitat structure: the physical arrangement of objects in space. Chapman and Hall, London. _____________, J. R. Pennock, J. F. Valentine, L. D. Coen and S. Sklenar. 2000. Effects of nutrient enrichment and large predator removal on seagrass nursery habitats: an experimental assessment. Limnol. Oceanogr. 45: 1041–1057. Heijs, F. M. L. 1984. Annual biomass and production of epiphytes in three monospecific seagrass communities of Thalassia hemprichii (Ehrenb.) Aschers. Aquat. Bot. 20: 195–218. Hemminga, M. A., and J. Nieuwenhuize. 1991. Transport, deposition and in situ decay of seagrasses in a tropical mudflat area (Banc d’Arguin, Mauritania). Neth. J. Sea Res. 27: 183–190. Hetler, W. F. 1989. Food habits of juveniles of spotted seatrout and gray snapper in western Florida bay. Bull. Mar. Sci. 44: 155–162. Jackson, J. 1997. Reefs since Columbus. Proc. 8th Int’l. Coral Reef Symp. 1: 97–106. Jernakoff, P., A. Brearley and J. Nielsen. 1996. Factors affecting grazer-epiphyte interactions in temperate seagrass meadows. Oceanogr. Mar. Biol. Ann. Rev. 34: 109–162. ___________ and J. Nielsen. 1997. The relative importance of amphipod and gastropod grazers in Posidonia sinuosa meadows. Aquat. Bot. 56: 183–202 Kenworthy, W. J., C. A. Currin, M. S. Fonseca and G. Smith. 1989. Production, decomposition and heterotrophic utilization of the seagrass Halophila decipiens in a submarine canyon. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 51: 277–290. Keough, M. J. 1986. The distribution of a bryozoan on seagrass blades: settlement, growth, and mortality. Ecology 67: 846–857. Klumpp, D. W., J. S. Salita-Espinosa and M. D. Fortes. 1992. The role of epiphytic periphyton and macroinvertebrate grazers in the trophic flux of a tropical seagrass community. Aquat. Bot. 43: 327–349. ____________, R. K. Howard, and D. A. Pollard. 1989. Trophodynamics and nutritional ecology of seagrass communities. Pages 349–457 in A. W. D. Larkum, A. J. McComb and S. A. Shepherd, eds. Biology of seagrasses. Elsevier, New York. Lavery, P. and M. Vanderklift. 2000. Comparison of spatial patterns in seagrass epiphyte assemblages using species and functional group data. Biol. Mar. Medit. 7: 251–254. Lawson, G. S., P. A. Tyler and C. M. Young. 1993. Attraction of deep-sea amphipods to macrophyte food falls. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 169: 33–39. Lenanton, R. C. J. 1982. Alternative non-estuarine nursery habitats for some commercially and recreationally important fish species of south-western Australia. Aust. J. Mar. Freshw. Res. 33: 881–900. _______________ and N. Caputi. 1989. The roles of food supply and shelter in the relationship between fishes, in particular Cnidoglanis macrocephalus (Valenciennes), and detached macrophytes in the surf zone of sandy beaches. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 128: 165–176. _______________, A. I. Robertson, and J. A. Hansen. 1982. Nearshore accumulations of detached macrophytes as nursery areas for fish. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 9: 51–57. Lepoint, G., F. Nyssen, S. Gobert, P. Dauby and J. M. Bouquegneau. 2000. Relative impact of a seagrass bed and its adjacent epilithic algal community in consumer diets. Mar. Biol. 136: 513– 518. Lobel, P. S. 1981. Trophic biology of herbivorous reef fishes: alimentary pH and digestive capabilities. J. Fish Biol. 19: 365–397.

VALENTINE ET AL.: SEAGRASS IMPACTS ON MARINE FOOD WEBS

1367

Lodge, D. M., G. Cronin, E. Van Donk and A. J. Froelich. 1998. Impact of herbivory on plant standing crop: comparisons among biomes, between vascular and non-vascular plants, and among freshwater herbivore taxa. Pages 149–174 in E. Jeppesen, Ma. Sondergaard, Mo. Sondergaard and K. Christoffersen, eds. The structuring role of submerged macrophytes in lakes. SpringerVerlag, New York. Luczkovich, J. J. and E. J. Stellway. 1993. Isolation of cellulolytic microbes from the intestinal tract of the pinfish, Lagodon rhomboides: size-related changes in diet and microbial abundance. Mar. Biol. 116: 381–388. Mazella, L. and V. Zupo. 1995. Reti trofiche e flussi di energia nei sistemi a fanerogame marine. Gion. Bot. Ital. 129: 337–350. _________, M. C. Buia, M. C. Gambi, M. Lorenti, G. F. Russo, M. B. Scipione, and V. Zupo. 1992. Plant-animal trophic relationships. Pages 165–188 in D. M. John, S. J. Hawkins and J. H. Price, eds. The Posidonia oceanica ecosystem of the Mediterranean Sea: A review. Plant-animal interactions in the marine benthos. Oxford, Clarendon Press. Systematics Association Special, vol. no. 46. _________, ________ and L. Spinoccia. 1995. Biodiversity of epiphytic diatom community on leaves of Posidonia oceanica. Pages 241–251 in D. Marino and M. Montresor, eds. Proc. 13th Diatom Symp.. Biopress Limited, Bristol. McAfee, S. T. and S. G. Morgan. 1996. Resource use by five sympatric parrotfishes in the San Blas Archipelago, Panama. Mar. Biol. 125: 427–437. McGlathery, K. J. 1995. Nutrient and grazing influences on a subtropical seagrass community. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 122: 239–252. Menzies, R. J. and G. T. Rowe. 1969. The distribution and significance of detrital turtle grass, Thalassia testudinata, on the deep-sea floor off North Carolina. Int. Revue ges. Hydrobiology 54: 217–222. Michot, T. C. and P. C. Chadwick. 1994. Winter biomass and nutrient values of three seagrass species as potential food sources for redheads (Aythya americana Eyton) in Chandeleur Sound, Louisianna. Wetlands. 14: 276–283. Montgomery, J. L. M. and. T. E. Targett. 1992. The nutritional role of seagrass in the diet of the omnivorous pinfish Lagodon rhomboides (L.). J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 158: 37–57. Mukai, H. and A. Iijima. 1995. Grazing effects of a gammaridean amphipoda, Ampithoe sp., on the seagrass, Syringodium isoetifolium, and epiphytes in a tropical seagrass bed of Fiji. Ecol. Res. 10: 243–257. Neckles, H. A., R. L. Wetzel and R. J. Orth. 1993. Relative effects of nutrient enrichment and grazing on epiphyte-macrophyte (Zostera marina L.) dynamics. Oecologia 93: 285–295. Nojima, S. and H. Mukai. 1990. Feeding habits of fishes associated with a tropical seagrass bed of Papua New Guinea. Publ. Amakusa Mar. Biol. Lab. 10: 175–186. Ochieng, C. A. and P. L. A. Erftemeijer. 1999. Accumulation of seagrass beach cast along the Kenyan coast: a quantitative assessment. Aquat. Bot. 65: 221–238. Ogden, J. C. and J. C. Zieman. 1977. Ecological aspects of coral reef-seagrass bed contacts in the Caribbean. Pages 377–382 In Proc. 3rd Int’l. Coral Reef Symp. Miami, Florida. __________ and P. R. Ehrlich. 1977. The behavior of heterotypic resting schools of juvenile grunts (Pomadasyidae). Mar. Biol. 1977: 273–280. Orth, R. J. and K. L. Heck, Jr. 1984. Faunal communities in seagrass beds: a review of the influence of plant structure and prey characteristics on predator-prey relationships. Estuaries 7: 339–350. ________ and J. von. Montfrans. 1984. Epiphyte-seagrass relationships with an emphasis on the role of micrograzing: a review. Aquat. Bot. 18: 43–69. Overholtzer, K. L. and P. J. Motta. 1999. Comparative resource use by juvenile parrotfishes in the Florida Keys. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 177: 177–187. Parrish, J. D. and R. J. Zimmerman. 1977. Utilization by fishes of shore and food resources on an offshore Puerto Rican coral reef and its surroundings. Proc. 3rd Int’l. Coral Reef Symp.

1368

BULLETIN OF MARINE SCIENCE, VOL. 71, NO. 3, 2002

Persson, L., J. Bengtsson, B. A. Menge and M. E. Power. 1996. Productivity and consumer regulation-concepts, patterns, and mechanisms. Pages 396–434 in G. Polis and K. Winemiller, eds. Food webs. Chapman and Hall, New York. Polis, G. A. and D. R. Strong. 1996. Food webs complexity and community dynamics. Amer. Nat. 147: 813–846. Polunin, N. V. C. 1996. Trophodynamics of reef fisheries productivity. Pages 113–135 in N. V. C. Polunin, C. M. Roberts and C.M. London, eds. Reef Fisheries. Chapman and Hall, New York. Randall, J. E. 1965. Grazing effect on sea grasses by herbivorous reef fishes in the West Indies. Ecology 46: 255–260. Robertson, A. I. and J. S. Lucas. 1983. Food choice, feeding rates, and the turnover of macrophytes biomass by a surf-zone inhabiting amphipod. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 72: 99–124. Rose, M. D. and G. A. Polis. 1998. The distribution and abundance of coyotes: the effects of allochthonous food subsidies from the sea. Ecology 79: 998–1007. Safina, C. 1995. The world’s imperiled fish. Sc. Amer. (Nov. 1995):46–53. _______. 1998. Song for the blue ocean. Holt Press. 458 p. Suchanek, T. H., S. L. Williams, J. C. Ogden, D. K. Hubbard and I. P. Gill. 1985. Utilization of shallow-water seagrass detritus by Caribbean deep sea macrofauna: d13C evidence. Deep-Sea Res. 32: 201–214. Thayer, G. W., K. A. Bjornal, J. C. Ogden, S. L. Williams and J. C. Zieman. 1984. Role of larger herbivores in seagrass communities. Estuaries 7: 351–376. ____________, D. W. Engel and M. W. La Croix. 1977. Seasonal distribution and changes in the nutritive quality of living and detrital fractions of Zostera marina L. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 30: 109–127. Thresher, R. E., P. D. Nichols, J. S. Gunn, B. D. Bruce and D. M. Furlani. 1992. Seagrass detritus as the basis of a coastal planktonic food chain. Limnol Oceanogr 37: 1754–1758. Valentine, J. F. and K.L. Heck, Jr. 1993. Mussels in seagrass meadows: their influence on macroinvertebrate abundance and secondary production in the Northern Gulf of Mexico. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 96: 63–74. ____________ and ____________. 1999. Seagrass herbivory: evidence for the continued grazing of marine grasses. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 176: 291–302. Vetter, E. 1994. Hotspots of benthic production. Nature 372: 47. _______. 1995. Detritus-based patches of high secondary production in the nearshore benthos. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 120: 251–262. _______. 1998. Population dynamics of a dense assemblage of marine detritivores. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 226: 131–161. Willcocks, P. A. 1982. Colonization and distribution of the red algal epiphytes Melobesia mediocris and Smithora naiadum on the seagrass Phyllospadix torreyi. Aquat. Bot. 12: 365–373. Williams, S. W. and K. L. Heck, Jr. 2001. Seagrass communities. Pages 317–337 in M. S. Bertness, S. Gaines and M. Hay, eds. Marine community ecology. Sinauer, Sunderland, Massachusetts. Williams, S. L. and M. H. Rucklehaus. 1993. Effects of nitrogen availability and herbivory on eelgrass (Zostera marina) and epiphytes. Ecology 74: 904–918. Wolff, T. 1979. Macrofaunal utilization of plant remains in the deep sea. Sarsia 64: 117–136. Young, C. M., P. A. Tyler, R. H. Emson and J. D. Gage. 1993. Perception and selection of macrophyte food falls by the bathyal echinoid Stylocidaris lineata. Deep-Sea Res. 40: 1475–1486. Zieman, J. C. 1975. Quantitative and dynamic aspects of the ecology of turtle grass, Thalassia testudinum. Estuarine Research. L. E. Cronin. Academic Press, New York. 1: 541–562. __________, R. L. Iverson and J. C. Ogden. 1984. Herbivory effects on Thalassia testudinum leaf growth and nitrogen content. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 15: 151–158. ADDRESS: Dauphin Island Sea Lab, Dauphin Island, AL 36528-0369 and Department of Marine Science, University of South Alabama, Mobile, Alabama 36688-0002. Tel. 334/861-7546, Fax 334/8617540. CORRESPONDENCE ADDRESS: (J.F.V.) Dauphin Island Sea Lab, 101 Bienville Boulevard, Dauphin Island, Alabama 36528-0369. E-mail: .