In the name of God

5 downloads 0 Views 227KB Size Report
WHOQoL-BREF Scale. Ali Gholami ... Corresponding Author: Ali Gholami, Neyshabur University of Medical Sciences, ..... Najafi M, ShEIKhVATAN M, Montazeri.
Shiraz E-Medical Journal Vol. 14, No. 3, July 2013 http://semj.sums.ac.ir/vol14/jul2013/92014.htm

Quality of Life in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: Application of WHOQoL-BREF Scale Ali Gholami 1, 2*, Mohammad Azini 3, Abasalt Borji 1, Faramarz Shirazi 3, Zahra Sharafi 3, Esmail Zarei 4 1

Nursing Department, Neyshabur University of Medical Sciences, Neyshabur, IR Iran 2 Students’ Research Committee, Neyshabur University of Medical Sciences, Neyshabur, IR Iran 3 Disease Prevention Group, Neyshabur University of Medical Sciences, Neyshabur, IR Iran 4 Occupational Health Department, Neyshabur University of Medical Sciences, Neyshabur, IR Iran

* Corresponding Author: Ali Gholami, Neyshabur University of Medical Sciences, Razi Avenue, Istgah Street, Neyshabur, IR Iran, Tel: +98-5513336610, Fax: +985513333964, E-mail: [email protected]

Received for Publication: May 9, 2013, Accepted for Publication: June 8, 2013 Abstract Background: Diabetes is one of the most important chronic diseases which may have a negative effect on the quality of life (QoL) of diabetic patients. The objective of this study was to evaluate QoL in patients with type 2 diabetes living in rural regions of Neyshabur (a city in the northeast of Iran) as well as determine some factors associated with it, by using the WHOQoL-BREFE scale. Methods and Materials: In this cross-sectional study, a total of 1847 patients with type 2 diabetes were studied in Neyshabur from April to July 2012. The Iranian version of the WHOQoL-BREF questionnaire was used to measure QoL. Linear Regression Model was conducted to determine the relation between QoL of study population and various variables. The level of significance was set at p < 0.05 for all analyses. Data were analyzed using SPSS software ver16. Results: The mean age of the study population was 59.65 ± 12.3 yr (Range: 30-97 yr). The majority of participants were female (69.8%). The overall observed Cronbach’s alpha coefficient for WHOQoL-BREF was 0.93 and for each domain of it ranged from 0.69 to 0.86. The total mean score of WHOQoL-BREF was 12.18. The lowest and the highest mean scores were observed in Psychological health domain (11.73) and Social relationship domain (12.66), respectively. Backward multiple linear re162

gression model revealed that Education levels, Marital Status and Household Income were significantly associated with all domains of WHOQoL-BREF (P < 0.05). Conclusions: The findings from this study appear that surveyed diabetic patients have WHOQoL-BREF scores that might be considered to indicate a moderate to low QoL, so it seems that providing international programs is necessary to improve QoL of them Keywords: Type 2 Diabetes; Quality of Life; WHOQoL-BREF; Neyshabur Introduction

tionnaire is one of the instruments that

Diabetes is one of the most important

is used to measure QoL in different

chronic diseases in population that oc-

patients groups (3-7). The WHOQoL-

curs either when the pancreas does not

BREF questionnaire is available in

produce enough insulin or when the

many languages (8) and also it has

body cannot effectively use the insulin

been translated into Persian and then

it produces. Type 1 diabetes known as

validated in Iran by Nedjat (9). Infor-

insulin-dependent, juvenile or child-

mation on the QoL of diabetic patients

hood-onset and Type 2 diabetes known

is important for health policy makers

as non-insulin-dependent or adult-

and physicians in order to identify and

onset. Type 2 diabetes comprises 90%

implement interventional programs for

of people with diabetes around the

improving the QoL of them. Some

world, and is largely the result of ex-

studies assessed QoL in diabetic pa-

cess body weight and physical inactiv-

tients and they suggest a decrease in

ity (1). Diabetes and its complications

their QoL (10-13). This study con-

may have negative effect on QoL of

ducted in order to assess QoL of dia-

patients, but relatively little is known

betic patients that they live in rural re-

about it. QoL is defined by World

gions of Neyshabur as well as deter-

Health Organization (WHO) as “an

mine some factors associated with it

individual's perception of their position

with use of WHOQoL-BREF scale.

in life in the context of the culture and

Materials & Methods

value systems in which they live and in

This cross-sectional study was con-

relation to their goals, expectations,

ducted in 1847 patients with type 2

standards and concerns” (2). In order

diabetes. The data were collected be-

to study QoL, we must be able to

tween April and July 2012, at the all

measure it. In the world, many general

rural regions of Neyshabur. Of all dia-

instruments have been used to measure

betic patients (n = 2224), three hundred

QoL. The World Health Organization

and seventy seven persons were ex-

QoL-BREF (WHOQoL-BREF) ques-

cluded from the study because of their 163

avoidance to participate in the study

to participate in the study. Data were

(response rate: 83.05%). Individuals

analyzed with the use of SPSS16 soft-

with diabetes were identified based on

ware. Descriptive analyses were con-

the lists available in the Neyshabur ru-

ducted including frequencies, percent-

ral health centers. In this study for all

ages, ranges, means, and standard de-

study population provided informed

viations (SD). The reliability of the

consent after being acquainted with the

WHOQoL- BREF domains was as-

purpose of study. Questionnaires have

sessed using Cronbach's Alpha (0.70

been filled by participants (except illit-

and over were deemed acceptable)

erate persons and some special situa-

(16). We also assessed the reliability of

tions) and all of them were informed

the overall QoL. We examined the

that their responses would remain con-

level of agreement between four do-

fidential. In this study, we made use of

mains of the WHOQoL- BREF with

the

questionnaire

the use of Pearson’s correlation coeffi-

that was validated by Nedjat in Iran

cient. t-independent test and multiple

(9). The WHOQoL-BREF question-

linear regression model (with back-

naire contains 26 questions: two ques-

ward method) were used to investigate

tions from the Overall QoL and Gen-

the relation between participants' QoL

eral Health and 24 questions of satis-

and their characteristics including sex,

faction divided into four domains: 1.

age, BMI, education level, marital

Physical

Psychological

status, household income and distance

Health, 3. Social Relationships, and 4.

from the city. In this study transformed

Environmental Health. The responses

scores were used for statistical analy-

of each question are rated on a 5-point

ses in all domains and P values less

Likert scale and scored from 1 to 5.

than 0.05 were regarded as significant.

Raw scores in each domain were trans-

Results

formed to a 4–20 score according to

Overall, 1847 diabetic patients were

guideline (8). The mean score of ques-

studied. Table 1 presents the character-

tions in each domain is used to calcu-

istics of study population. The mean

late the domain score and finally they

age of participants was 59.65 ± 12.3 yr

transformed linearly to a 0–100-scale

(Rang: 30-97 yr). In this study majority

(14, 15). Higher scores are associated

of study population were female (sex

with a higher QoL. Inclusion criteria

ratio: 2.31). Cronbach’s alpha coeffi-

applied in the study included: (a) hav-

cient was applied to evaluate the inter-

ing diabetes type 2, (b) residence in

nal consistency of WHOQoL-BREF

Neyshabur rurals regions (c) agreement

scale and the four domains of it. The

WHOQoL-BREF

Health,

2.

164

observed Cronbach’s alpha coefficient

BREF (P < 0.05). Table 4 shows the

for all questions of WHOQoL-BREF

results of Backward Multiple Linear

was 0.93 and for each domain the val-

Regression; it shows that sex, age,

ues are: Physical health domain = 0.86,

education level, marital status and

Psychological health domain = 0.78,

household income are significantly as-

Social relationship domain = 0.69 and

sociated with total WHOQoL. Educa-

Environmental health domain = 0.76.

tion level, marital status and household

Table 2 displays correlations between

income are associated with four do-

four domains of WHOQoL-BREF; as

mains of WHOQoL. Age is associated

observed; there were significant cor-

with Physical Health and Psychologi-

relations between all domains (P