when playing winter rugby league (relative ... Keywords: rugby league; injury; injury risk; summer ..... selected playing surfaces in the national football league:.
Br J Sports Med 1998;32:149–152
149
Injury in summer rugby league football: the experiences of one club C Gissane, D Jennings, J White, A Cumine
Reigate, Surrey, United Kingdom D Jennings Department of Public Health Medicine and Epidemiology, University Hospital, Queen’s Medical Centre, Nottingham NG7 2UH, United Kingdom J White Division of Sport Science and Physical Education, St Mary’s University College, Strawberry Hill, Twickenham, Middlesex TW1 4SX, United Kingdom A Cumine Correspondence to: C Gissane, Brunel University, Osterley Campus, Borough Road, Isleworth, Middlesex TW7 5DU, United Kingdom. Accepted for publication 1 September 1997
elimination of two cup competitions. Injury studies carried out in Australia1 3 5 have consistently reported higher injury rates than English studies,2 4 and it was surmised that this was due to the game being played on harder surfaces.4 Playing rugby league in the summer months may also increase the likelihood of players suffering from thermal injuries and heat stroke, as the result of a combination of higher temperatures and relative humidities.6–8 It is unusual for a sport to completely change its playing calendar, and this move may result in an alteration in the risk of injury to players. Therefore the purpose of the present study was to ascertain whether or not the movement of the playing season from the autumn and winter months to the spring and summer months would alter the risk of injury to players taking part in professional rugby league in the new European Super League established in March 1996. Methods During the initial European Super League season all injuries that were reported for the first team at one professional rugby league club were recorded. The injury data were compared with first team data from a previous study on the same club over a period of four seasons.4 An injury was defined as a physical impairment received during a competitive match which 100
(Br J Sports Med 1998;32:149–152) Keywords: rugby league; injury; injury risk; summer rugby; cohort study
90
80
Studies of injury in rugby league football have previously reported rates of injury1–4 higher than for many other team sports.3 The reason for this high injury rate is probably the high number of physical collisions in which players are involved during the course of a game.1 With increasing professionalism in the sport, injuries are an important issue, both in terms of team success and the livelihood of the players themselves.3 The year of 1996 saw a bold move, with European rugby league taking place in the spring and summer months, as opposed to its more traditional time of autumn, winter, and spring. This move meant that matches would be played in higher temperatures (London temperature (mean (range)) in September to April 9.5 (6–14)°C and in April to September 18.6 (13–22)°C) and on harder surfaces. There would, however, be one third fewer competitive matches to be played, because of the restructuring of the league (12 teams) and the
All players RR = 1.67 Forwards RR = 1.08 Backs RR = 2.36 All players Forwards Backs
70
Rate per 1000 hours
Department of Health Studies, Brunel University, Isleworth, Middlesex TW7 5DU, United Kingdom C Gissane
Abstract Objective—To investigate whether the movement of the playing season from winter to summer would alter the risk of injury to players taking part in first team European professional rugby league. Methods—The study design was a historical cohort design comparing winter and summer seasons in first team European rugby league, which recorded injuries received by players during match play. Each injury was classified according to site, type, player position, activity at the time of injury, and time oV as a result of injury. Results—The risk of injury when playing summer rugby league was higher than when playing winter rugby league (relative risk = 1.67 (95% confidence interval 1.18 to 2.17)). Both forwards (1.08 (0.28 to 1.88)) and backs (2.36 (2.03 to 2.69)) experienced an increased risk of injury. Conclusions—Summer rugby may have resulted in a shift of injury risk factors as exhibited by a change in injury patterns. This may be due to playing conditions, but there were also some law changes. Changes in playing style, team tactics, player equipment, fitness preparation, and the reduced preseason break may also have had confounding eVects on injury risk.
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
Winter rugby
Summer rugby
Figure 1 Comparison of injury rates for winter and summer rugby league (with 95% confidence interval).
150
Gissane, Jennings, White, Cumine Table 1
Relative risk of types of injury Winter
Haematomas Muscle strains Muscular injuries (total) Joint sprain Laceration Contusion Fracture and dislocation Concussion Others All injuries
Summer
No
Rate per 1000 hours
No
Rate per 1000 hours
RR
95% CI
4 18 22 25 4 4 8 8 1 72
1.68 7.54 9.22 10.48 1.68 1.68 3.35 3.35 0.42 30.18
2 1 3 8 0 0 7 1 1 20
5.03 2.51 7.54 20.12 — — 17.60 2.51 2.51 50.29
3.00* 0.33 0.82 1.92* — — 5.25* 0.75 6.00* 1.67*
1.3 to 4.7 −1.7 to 2.4 −0.4 to 2.0 1.1 to 2.7 — — 4.2 to 6.3 −1.3 to 2.8 3.2 to 8.8 1.2 to 2.2
RR, relative risk; CI, confidence interval. * p < 0.05.
prevented a player from being available for selection for the next competitive game.1 The games were 7 (1.09) (mean (SD)) days apart. The diagnosis and classification of injury was carried out by the club doctor and physiotherapist. The type of information recorded for each injury has been described previously.2 4 9 The population at risk was defined as the players who were selected to play for the first team in a given match, and the defined time at risk for calculating injury rates was the duration of the games multiplied by the number of players (1.33 hours × 13 players) multiplied by the number of games played. The average number of games played during the winter season was 34.5 (596.5 player hours), with each player averaging 12.1 appearances per season, and during the summer season 23 games (397.67 player hours) were played in the Super League of 1996, with each player averaging 8.3 appearances. Statistical analyses consisted of the calculation of injury rate per 1000 hours of play as a standardised rate of exposure.10 To calculate the relative risk (RR) of injury between winter and summer rugby league, we used the incidence density ratio (IDR) method described by Hennekens and Buring11 for the two cohorts. RR (IDR) =
No of summer injuries/exposure time (hours) No of winter injuries/exposure time (hours)
Confidence intervals (95% CI) were calculated using the method described by McNeil.12 Where the CI did not contain the null value (RR = 1.0), the RR was taken as being significant at the p
