introduction methods conclusions disclosures ...

4 downloads 0 Views 3MB Size Report
DISCLOSURES. J Harthan: Bausch +Lomb, Contamac, Metro Optics. J Kwan: Johnson & Johnson Vision Care, Inc. D Opitz: Allergan, Bausch + Lomb, Glaucox, ...
Meibomian Gland Dysfunction in Pre- and Post-Menopausal Women Jennifer S. Harthan, OD, FAAO, FSLS, Justin T. Kwan, OD, FAAO, Dominick L. Opitz, OD, FAAO, Milton M. Hom, OD, FAAO, FACAAI (Sc) 1

2

1

3

Illinois College of Optometry, Chicago, IL, Southern California College of Optometry at Marshall B. Ketchum University, Fullerton, CA, Private Practice, Azusa, CA

1

3241 South Michigan Avenue, Chicago, Illinois 60616

2

AAO  2015  Poster    

3

 

Confidential  

Results:     • 56  females  older  than  40  years  of  age  were  enrolled.   • None of the clinical tests nor symptom surveys showed a • 42  females  younger  than  40  years  of  age  were  enrolled.   significance between the two cohorts for OSDI • None  of  the  clinical  tests  nor  symptom  surveys  showed  a  statistical statistical  significance   between   (p=0.146). the  two  cohorts  for  MGD  expression  grade  (p=0.285).  Figures   2-­‐4   • 56 females older than 40 years age were • None   of  the  ofclinical   tests  nenrolled. or  symptom  surveys  showed  •  a  In statistical   significance   the younger thanbetween   40 group, 23 out of 42 subjects had • 42 females younger than offor   age were enrolled. the  t40 wo  years cohorts   OSDI   (p=0.146).     AAO  2015   Poster   MGD (54.8%) and in the older than 40 group, 34 out of the In  the   younger   than  4surveys 0  group,  showed 23  out  of  4a2  subjects  had  MGD  (54.8%)  and  in   the  2o015   lder   AAO   Poster     • None of the clinical• tests nor symptom 56Fsubjects than  40  group,  34  out  of  the  56  subjects  had  MGD  (60.7%).   igure  5   had   MGD (60.7%). Figure 5 statistical significance between the two cohorts for MGD • 4The over 40 reported constant Figure   :  Gorade   othan f  wM GD   ifemales n  Pre-­‐  and   Post-­‐  Mmore enopausal   Women   • The  over  than  40  females  reported  more  constant   frequency   f  their   orst   symptom   expression grade (p=0.285). Figures 2-4 to  bright  light  compared  to  the  under  40  females.     Figures  2:  Meibography  in  a  Patient  Older  than  40   and  higher   sensitivity   frequency of their   worst symptom and higher sensitivity to   Grade   of  compared MGD  in  Pre-­‐   nd  under Post-­‐Menopausal   bright light to athe 40 females. Women   Figures  2:  Meibography  in  a  Patient  Younger  than  40     35  

RESULTS

Meibomian Gland Dysfunction (MGD) is commonly associated with the signs and symptoms of ocular surface disease in dry eye patients (up to 86%). In 2010, the International Workshop on Meibomian Gland Dysfunction developed a recommended definition for MGD : “Meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD) is a chronic, diffuse abnormality of the meibomian glands, commonly characterized by terminal duct obstruction and/or qualitative/ quantitative changes in the glandular secretions. This may result in alterations of the tear film, symptoms of eye irritation, clinically apparent inflammation, and ocular surface disease.” 1

Number  of  Women  

INTRODUCTION

Figure 2: Meibography in a Patient Confidential   AAO  2015  Poster     Younger than The production of   lipids and meibum from the meibomian Meibomian   Gland  Dvascular, ysfunction  iand n  Pre-­‐   and  Post-­‐Menopausal  Women   glands is controlled by neuronal, hormonal 40

30  

25   Figure 3: 20   Meibography in15  a Patient 10   Older than 40

Younger  than  40   Older  than  40  

5  

  factors. Common perception among practitioners is that Authors:  Jennifer  S.  Harthan,  OD,  FAAO,  FSLS,1  Justin  T.  Kwan,  OD,  FAAO,2  Dominick  L.  Opitz,   females may be particularly affected in O periandFACAAI   post-(Sc)3     M.  Hom,   D,  FAAO,   OD,  FAAO,1  Milton  

0  

menopausal years secondary AAO  2015  Poster   1 to these hormonal regulatory 2 Affiliations:   Illinois  College  of  Optometry,  Chicago,  IL,   Southern  California  College  of     controls. This study lookedato differences forFMGD Optometry   t  Mcompare arshall  B.  Ketchum   University,   ullerton,  CA,  3Private  Practice,  Azusa,  CA     patients of pre- and post-menopausal ages.  

1  

2  

3  

Grade  of  MGD  

4  

Confidential  

 

CONCLUSIONS Past perceptions of dry eye patient demographics may age bias clinicians to under diagnose Meibomian Gland Confidential   Confidential   Dysfuction (MGD). No significant differences found between the two cohorts suggest that hormonal controls might play a more minor role in MGD than as previously thought. As MGD is one of the most common causes for the development of ocular surface disease symptoms (specifically those associated with dry eye conditions), younger women with dry eye symptoms need careful ocular surface evaluation, just like their older cohort.

DISCLOSURES J Harthan: Bausch +Lomb, Contamac, Metro Optics J Kwan: Johnson & Johnson Vision Care, Inc. D Opitz: Allergan, Bausch + Lomb, Glaucox, NiCox   M Hom: Abbott Medical Optics , Alcon, Allergan, Bausch + Lomb, Shire, Valeant

        Figure  4:  Grade  o  f  MGD  in  Pre-­‐  and  Post-­‐  Menopausal  WFigure   omen   Figure  4:  Grade  of  MGD  in  Pre-­‐  and  Post-­‐  Menopausal  Women   5:  Presence  of  MGD  in  Females  by  Age       Introduction:   Figure 4: Grade of MGD in Pre- and Figure 5: Presence of MGD in Females by Age     PostMenopausal Women Grade   o   f  M in  Pre-­‐  and  Post-­‐Menopausal  Women   Presence  of  MGD  in  Females  by  Age   Meibomian  Gland  Dysfunction  (MGD)  is  commonly  associated  with   the  signs   and  symptoms   of   GD   60   ocular  surface  disease  in  dry  eye  patients  (up  to  86%).  The  production  of  lipids  and  meibum     1. Nelson JD, Shimazaki J, Benitz-de-Castillo JM, et al. The from  the  meibomian  glands  is  controlled  by  neuronal,  vascular,  and  hormonal  factors.  Common     international workshop on meibomian gland dysfunction: 50   perception   among   pAAO   ractitioners   i s   t hat   f emales   m ay   b e   p articularly   a ffected   i n   p eri-­‐   a nd   p ost-­‐ • Subjects over age 18 were enrolled. 2015  Poster   Confidential   35     report of the definition and classification subcommittee. Invest menopausal  years  secondary  to  these  hormonal  regulatory  controls.  This  study  looked  to   • Subjects were administered the Ocular Surface Disease   40   Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011;52:1930-7. compare  differences  for  MGD  patients  of  pre-­‐  and  post-­‐menopausal  ages.   30   70.00%   2015   oster   Symptom Score (TOSS), and a 9 Confidential     Index AAO   (OSDI), TotalPOcular Older   2. tBhan   ron40  AJ, Tiffany JM. The meibomian gland and tear film lipids: 30     Methods:     60.00%   structure, symptom questionnaire that asked both4:   frequency and Figure   G rade   o f   M GD   i n   P re-­‐   a nd   P ost-­‐   M enopausal   W omen   25   Younger   than  40   function and control. Adv Exp Med Biol. 1998;438:281-95.     3. Foulks GN, Bron AJ. Meibomian gland dysfunction: a clinical 50.00%   intensity of dry eye. 20   Subjects  over  age  18  were  enrolled  and  administered  the  Ocular  Surface  Disease  Index  (OSDI),     scheme for description, diagnosis, classification, and grading. Ocul 20   Figure   4 :   G rade   o f   M GD   i n   P re-­‐   a nd   P ost-­‐   M enopausal   W omen   Total  classified Ocular  Symptom   Score   and  a  9  symptom   questionnaire  that  asked  both  frequency   40.00%     • Subjects were then based on(TOSS),   Meibomian Gland Grade  of  MGD  in  Pre-­‐  and  Post-­‐Menopausal  Women   Surf. 2003 Jul;1(3):107-126. 10   and  intensity  of  dry  eye.  Subjects  were  then  classified  based  on  Meibomian  Gland  (MG)   Younger   15   30.00%  than  40   (MG) expressionexpression   grade (1.0 or worse). 4. Foulks GN, Nichols KK, Bron AJ, et al. Improving awareness, grade  (1.0  or  worse).  The  worst  eye  results  were  taken.     identification, and management of meibomian gland dysfunction. f  MGD  in  Pre-­‐  and  Post-­‐Menopausal  Women   0   20.00%     Grade   • The worst eye results were otaken. Older   t han   4 0   10   1   2   3   4   Ophthalmology. 2012;119(10):S1-11. Figure  1:  Meibomian  Gland  D35   ysfunction  Grade  1   10.00%       5.  K orb DR, Greiner JV. Increase in tear film lipid layer thickness 5     0.00%   30   following treatment of meibomian gland dysfunction. Adv Exp 35       than  40   Younger   Older  than  40   Med Biol. 1994; 350: 293-298. 0     25   30   6. Korb DR, Blackie CA. Meibomian gland diagnostic expressibility: 1   2   3   4     correlation with dry eye symptoms and gland location. Cornea.   20   25   Grade  of  MGD   2008 Dec;27(10):1142-7. Figure 1:  

REFERENCES

Number  of  Women  

Number  of  Women  

Number  of  Women  

METHODS

Meibomian 20   Gland 15   Dysfunction 10   Grade 1

15   10   5   0  

5   0  

Younger  than  40  

1  

2  

Older  than  40  

Younger  than  40  

Conclusions:  

Older  than  40  

Past  perceptions  of  dry  eye  patient  demographics  may  age  bias  clinicians  to  under  diagnose   CONTACT Meibomian  Gland  Dysfuction  (MGD).  No  significant  differences  found  between   the  two  cohorts  INFORMATION suggest  that  hormonal  controls  might  play  a  more  minor  role  in  MGD  than  aJennifer s  previously   S. Harthan, OD, FAAO, FSLS thought.  As  MGD  is  one  of  the  most  common  causes  for  the  development  [email protected] f  ocular  surface  

Figure  5:  Presence  of  MGD  in  Females  by  Age   1  

2  

3  

Grade   of  MGD     4  

Grade  of  MGD  

3  

4  

Presence  of  MGD  in  Females  by  Age  

www.ico.edu