Introduction Results Introduction Results Introduction ...

3 downloads 0 Views 393KB Size Report
Department of Biological Sciences Southeastern Louisiana University Hammond LA 70402. Department of Biological Sciences, Southeastern Louisiana ...
P tt Patterns off genetic g ti diversity di ity and d structure t t off three th nymphalid y ph lid b tt fly species butterfly p i in i Ghana: Gh the th role l off forest f t fragmentation f g t ti Josephine B Antwi and Janice L Bossart Department of Biological Sciences, Sciences Southeastern Louisiana University University, Hammond Hammond, LA 70402

Introduction ‰ Human u a activities act t es such suc as farming farming, a g, l logging i and d urban b development d l t have h caused the loss of forest habitats in Gh Ghana Ghana, West W t Africa. Africa Af i ‰ Remnant R t forest f t patches t h are isolated i l t d and embedded in human derived landscapes landscapes.

Results ‰ Number of haplotypes recovered across all sites f each for h species i include: i l d ƒ Aterica galene g = 41 ƒ Euphaedra E h d medon d = 24 ƒ Gnophodes p betsimena = 5 ‰ Majority M j it off private i t haplotypes h l t were located l t d in i small ll sacred g groves (Figure ( g 1))

‰ Genetic consequences q of populations l ti in i forest f t patches t h are largely g y negative g including: g ƒ loss of genetic diversity ƒg genetic isolation of fragmented g populations l ti ƒ inbreeding g depression p and loss of fit fitness

(A)

A26

A27

Figure 1 (A) Map showing sampling

E18

sites for the three species. High Hi gh matrix t i disturbance: di t b Kaj Gya and Asa Kaj, Low matrix disturbance: Bob Bon Bob, Bon, Kon and Owa

Kon Owa

Kumasi

Bon

Kaj B b Bob

A10

E7

E8

G Gya A11 A24

E15

A25

Asa

Lake Bosumtwi

A14

E10

E9

E11

E16

Circles represent private h l t haplotypes ffor each h species i occurring at the small sacred groves. g

G5 G3

‰ Different Diff t species i have h differing diff i life lif histories & ecological demands. demands Thus Thus, us, the t e impacts pacts o of fragmentation ag e tat o are expected t d to t differ diff among them, them th e g patterns e.g. p of population p p genetic g diff differentiation differentiation. ti ti ‰ Three Th Nymphalid N h lid butterfly b tt fl species i off contrasting g habitat requirements & dispersal abilities were used to address this issue. issue

Average number of individuals, haplotypes, nucleotide diversity, h pl typ di haplotype diversity, ity, and d Fst F t between b t populations. p p l ti ((*)) iindicates di t significance. ig ifi

N

No. N o o off Nucleotide N ucleottid de Haplotype Haplotype t h pl typ haplotypes di diversity ity di diversity ity

F t Fst

At i galene Aterica l

13

5

0 006 0.006

0 880 0.880

0 172* 0.172* 0.172

E h d medon Euphaedra d

15

3

0 006 0.006

0 825 0.825

0 006 0.006

Gnophodes betsimena

13

1

9x10-4

0 107 0.107

- 0.676 0 676

Table 2 2.

AMOVA indicating i di ti g ttotal t lg genetic ti variation i ti explained pl i d within ithi groups g p off populations (*) populations. ( ) indicates non significance significance.

Source off S variation i ti

df d.f

Variance V i component p t

% variation i ti

P

A galene A.

84

1 85 1.85

87

0 00 0.00

E medon E. d

97

1 48 1.48

98

NS* NS

G betsimena G.

89

0 07 0.07

103

NS*

G4

(B) Study species

Prediction

T bl 1. Table 1

(B) G Gnophodes h d b betsimena t i

• Lower dispersal ability • Less L forest f t dependent p

At i galene Aterica l

• Lowest dispersal ability • Most M t fforestt d p d t dependent

E h d medon Euphaedra d

• Highest dispersal ability • More M fforestt dependent

M th d Methods ‰ Two forest reserves ((Bob and Owa)) and five sacred g groves (Asa ((Asa, Kon Kon, Bon, Bon Kajj and Gya) y ) in Ashanti Region (Figure 1) were sampled using fruit fruit-baited baited traps. traps ‰ Species p were chosen based on their relative dispersal p abilities and habitat fidelities (figure ( g 1) 1). ) ‰ Mitochondrial gene g COI was amplified p using gp primers LC02198 and HC01490 for both PCR and sequencing i reactions. ti ‰ Haplotype H l t and d nucleotide l tid diversities di iti were estimated ti t d using i DNASP 4.90.1 4 90 1

IBD – There was no isolation-by-distance y between populations of species. species

C Conclusions l i and dF Future t work k ‰ Relatively y high g g genetic differentiation in A. A galene g populations populations, l ti especially i ll between b t Kaj K j vs. vs the th other th populations populations, p p , indicates the sensitivity y of this species i to t forest f t fragmentation. f t ti ‰ Euphaedra E phaedra medon populations pop lations showed sho ed no differentiation (except between Kaj and Asa) Asa). Their relatively y high g dispersal p abilities may y have f ilit t d this facilitated thi this. ‰ There Th was no differentiation diff ti ti between b t any Gnophodes p betsimena p populations p and g genetic di diversity it was llow. Th Their i tolerance t l to t forest f t habitat h bit t degradation coupled with their dispersal abilities, degradation, abilities may ay be facilitating ac tat g ge gene e flow flow. o Why y ge genetic et c di diversity it in i this thi species i was so much h lower l vs. vs the th other two is not known at this time. time ‰ Observed patterns p of differentiation are consistent with ith our hypotheses. h th Larger L sample l sizes i and d use of rapidly p y evolving g markers such as μ μSATs could potentially reveal stronger population isolation. isolation

‰ Arlequin q 3.0 3 0 was used to estimate pairwise p Fst between p populations p ‰ AMOVA AMOVA,, as implemented p in Arlequin Arlequin, q , was assessed based on the intensity y of disturbance (highly ( g y di t b d to disturbed t least l t disturbed di t b d in i figure fi 1) off matrices ti surrounding di forest f t fragments. f t ‰ The Th program TCS 1.21 1 21 was used d to t construct t t haplotype h l t networks t k for f each h species. i ‰ To test whether genetic isolation increased with distance a Mantel test in the program IBD was i implemented l d

A k Acknowledgements l d ‰ We appreciate pp the contributions of Jim Fetzner (C (Carnegie i Museum M off N Natural t l Hi History) t ) and dK Kyle l Pill Piller and dM Mary Whit White (Southeastern (S th t Louisiana L i i University). U i it ) ‰ We thank National Science Foundation (NSF) for their generous support g pp