Melanoma Therapy via Peptide-Targeted A-Radiation

3 downloads 62 Views 551KB Size Report
Aug 1, 2005 - Melanoma Therapy via Peptide-Targeted A-Radiation. Yubin Miao,1,2,3 .... 420 to 810 keV. Blood values were taken as 6.5% of the whole body.
Cancer Therapy: Preclinical

Melanoma Therapy via Peptide-Targeted A-Radiation Yubin Miao,1,2,3 Mark Hylarides,6 Darrell R. Fisher,7 Tiffani Shelton,2 Herbert Moore,6 Dennis W. Wester,7 Alan R. Fritzberg,6 Christopher T. Winkelmann,4 Timothy Hoffman,2,3,5 and Thomas P. Quinn1,3,5

Abstract

Purpose: The therapeutic efficacy of a unique melanoma-targeting peptide conjugated with an in vivo generated a-particle-emitting radionuclide was evaluated in the B16/F1mouse melanoma animal model. a-Radiation is densely ionizing, resulting in high concentrations of destructive radicals and irreparable DNA double-strand breaks. This high linear energy transfer overcomes radiation-resistant tumor cells and oxygen effects resulting in potentially high therapeutic indices in tumors such as melanoma. Experimental Design: The melanoma targeting peptide, 1,4,7,10-tetraazacyclodecane-1,4,7,10tetraacetic acid (DOTA)-Re(Arg11)CCMSH, was radiolabeled with 212Pb, the parent of 212Bi, which decays via a and h decay. Biodistribution and therapy studies were done in the B16/F1 melanoma-bearing C57 mouse flank tumor model. Results: 212Pb[DOTA]-Re(Arg11)CCMSH exhibited rapid tumor uptake and extended retention coupled with rapid whole body disappearance. Radiation dose delivered to the tumor was estimated to be 61cGy/ACi 212Pb administered. Treatment of melanoma-bearing mice with 50, 100, and 200 ACi of 212Pb[DOTA]-Re(Arg11)CCMSH extended their mean survival to 22, 28, and 49.8 days, respectively, compared with the14.6-day mean survival of the placebo control group. Fortyfive percent of the mice receiving 200 ACi doses survived the study disease-free. Conclusions: Treatment of B16/F1 murine melanoma ^ bearing mice with 212Pb[DOTA]Re(Arg11)CCMSH significantly decreased tumor growth rates resulting in extended mean survival times, and in many cases, complete remission of disease. 212Pb-DOTA-Re(Arg11)CCMSH seems to be a very promising radiopharmaceutical for targeted radionuclide therapy of melanoma.

The incidence and mortality rates associated with melanoma have increased by 3% to 7% in recent years (1, 2). Early melanoma tumor diagnosis and prompt surgical removal are a patient’s best hope for a cure. Unfortunately, metastatic melanoma is resistant to current chemotherapy and immunotherapy regimens. Survival times for patients with lymph node metastases average 12 to 15 months, whereas patients with liver and bone metastases average 3 to 4 months (1). Despite extensive research, there have been no major improvements in advanced melanoma treatment outcomes during the past 30 years. Targeted radionuclide therapy, namely a-particle therapy, is a potentially important alternative to conventional therapeutic regimens. In comparison with external beam radiation

Authors’ Affiliations: Departments of 1Biochemistry, 2 Internal Medicine, 3 Radiology, and 4Veterinary Pathobiology, University of Missouri-Columbia, 5Harry S. Truman Veterans Administration Hospital, Columbia, Missouri; 6AlphaMed, Inc., Acton, Massachusetts; and 7Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington Received 3/18/05; revised 5/4/05; accepted 5/11/05. Grant support: NIH grant R42-CA85106 (T.P. Quinn), T32-RR07004 (C.T. Winkelmann) and U.S. Department of Energy grant ER61661 (T.P. Quinn). The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact. Requests for reprints: Thomas P. Quinn, 117 Schweitzer Hall, Department of Biochemistry, University of Missouri-Columbia, Columbia, MO 65211. Phone: 573882-6099; Fax: 573-884-4812; E-mail: quinnt@ missouri.edu. F 2005 American Association for Cancer Research.

Clin Cancer Res 2005;11(15) August 1, 2005

therapy and chemotherapy, targeted radionuclide therapy offers the potential of tumor-selective radiotherapeutic treatment of distal metastases whereas sparing normal tissues and organs. a-Particles are doubly-charged helium ions with energies of 5 to 9 MeV characterized by high linear energy transfer over short path lengths (30-90 Am; refs. 3, 4). Only a few a-particle traversals per cell are necessary to cause irreversible damage resulting in cell death (5). Cytotoxicity of a-particle radiation is independent of dose rate (4) and unaffected by tissue oxygen levels (6), which allow tumors with hypoxic regions to be effectively irradiated. The short range and high ionization density associated with a-particles contribute to highly specific destruction within tumors, whereas minimizing collateral damage of healthy tissues. Promising preclinical a-particle radioimmunotherapy results with leukemia (7, 8) lung (9), ovarian (10), and prostate cancers (11) have been shown. In addition, early clinical trials have highlighted the potential of 213 Bi and 211At labeled immunoconjugates for a-radiotherapy (12, 13). Over the past several years, our laboratory has developed a novel class of metal-cyclized melanotropin peptide analogues for melanoma imaging and therapy that target the melanocortin-1 receptor, which is overexpressed on melanoma tumor cells (14 – 16). Incorporation of a rhenium metal atom into the structure of the cyclic melanotropin peptide resulted in resistance to chemical and proteolytic degradation in vivo, whereas retaining high bioactivities. In this study, we report the melanoma therapeutic effects of targeted a-particle

5616

www.aacrjournals.org

Melanoma a-Radiotherapy

radiotherapy using the 1,4,7,10-tetraazacyclodecane-1,4,7,10tetraacetic acid (DOTA) – conjugated melanotropin analogue, DOTA-Re(Arg11)CCMSH (17), radiolabeled with 212Pb. High tumor to normal tissue uptake ratios of 212Pb[DOTA]Re(Arg11)CCMSH coupled with rapid whole body disappearance of activity, resulted in large and selective radiation doses to the tumors. Treatment of melanoma-bearing mice with 212 Pb[DOTA]-Re(Arg11)CCMSH yielded a dose-dependent reduction in tumor growth and total eradication of many tumors at higher activity levels. Despite being classified as a radiation-resistant neoplasm, melanoma was efficaciously treated by peptide-targeted a-radiation in tumor-bearing mice, highlighting the clinical potential of targeted a-radiotherapy for disseminated melanoma.

Materials and Methods Synthesis of 212Pb-DOTA-Re(Arg11)CCMSH. DOTA-Re(Arg11)CCMSH, was synthesized and purified by a method previously described (17). DOTA-Re(Arg11)CCMSH was radiolabeled with 212Pb obtained from a 224Ra-212Pb/212Bi radioisotope generator (ref. 18; AlphaMed, Inc., Acton, MA). Preferential elution of 212Pb was done by rinsing the generator column with 0.5 N HCl to remove the majority of 212 Bi and its daughters followed by a 2 N HCl rinse to elute the 212Pb along with any remaining 212Bi. Shortly following the time of elution, 212 Pb was in dynamic equilibrium with 212Bi and its daughters. DOTARe(Arg11)CCMSH was radiolabeled by combining 100 to 350 AL of the generator eluant, 85 AL of 5 mol/L NaOH, 250 AL of 0.5 mol/L NH4OAc (pH 5.4), and 25 AL of 1 mg/mL DOTA-Re(Arg11)CCMSH into a reaction vial and incubated at 75jC for 40 minutes. 212Pb-DOTARe(Arg11)CCMSH was purified to a single species using HPLC with a C-18 reverse phase analytic column. Prior to the HPLC collection, 25 mg of L-ascorbic acid was added into the collection vial to minimize the radiolysis of 212Pb-DOTA-Re(Arg11)CCMSH. The radioactivity of 212 Pb-DOTA-Re(Arg11)CCMSH preparation was determined immediately after HPLC purification in a Capintec CRC-15R dose calibrator calibrated with a standardized 212Pb sample obtained from Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (Richland, WA). Purified peptide solutions were purged with nitrogen gas for 20 minutes to remove the acetonitrile and adjusted to pH 5 with 0.9% NaCl. Animal studies. Animal studies were conducted in compliance with Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee approval. Pharmacokinetic and therapy studies were done in C57 black mice bearing B16/F1 murine melanoma tumors. Melanocortin-1 receptors on B16/F1 murine melanoma and human melanoma have indistinguishable affinities for the radionuclide targeting peptide (16), suggesting that the results obtained in the B16 melanoma model will be translatable to human melanoma models and potential clinical use. Mice were inoculated s.c. with 1  106 B16/F1 murine melanoma cells in the right flank for biodistribution studies. When the weight of tumors reached f0.2 g, 0.16 to 4.40 ACi of 212Pb-DOTA-Re(Arg11)CCMSH was injected into each mouse through the tail vein. Groups of four mice per each time point were used for the biodistribution studies. The mice were sacrificed at 5 and 30 minutes, and 1, 2, 4, 24, and 48 hours postinjection, and tumors and organs of interest were harvested, weighed and counted in a Wallac 1480 automated gamma counter using the following energy windows, 212Pb/190 to 260 keV and 212Bi/ 420 to 810 keV. Blood values were taken as 6.5% of the whole body weight. The results were expressed as a percentage of the injected dose per gram (%ID/g) and as the percentage of injected dose (%ID). The tumor uptake specificity of 212Pb-DOTA-Re(Arg11)CCMSH was determined by blocking tumor uptake at 2 hours postinjection with the coinjection of 10 Ag of unlabeled NDP (19), a linear a-MSH peptide analogue with picomolar affinity for the a-MSH receptor present on murine melanoma cells.

www.aacrjournals.org

Dosimetry studies. The biodistribution of 212Pb-DOTA-Re(Arg11)CCMSH over time was determined to calculate radiation absorbed doses from 212Pb-DOTA-Re(Arg11)CCMSH in tumor and normal organs and tissues using methods described previously (20 – 22). Time-activity curves were generated for 13 organs and tissues (blood, brain, heart, lung, liver, spleen, stomach, kidney, large intestine, small intestine, muscle, pancreas, and tumor). Cumulative activities of 212Pb and 212Bi were determined for each organ by integrating the area under the time-activity curves. The cumulative activities were then used with a dosimetric model (21, 22) developed specifically for the laboratory mouse, accounting for the a- and h-radiation deposited locally. The dosimetric model is used to evaluate dose from activity within tissues as well as the cross-organ h dose contributions. Radionuclide therapy of 212Pb-DOTA-Re(Arg11)CCMSH. The therapeutic efficacy of 212Pb-DOTA-Re(Arg11)CCMSH was examined in B16/ F1 murine melanoma – bearing C57 mice. C57 mice were inoculated s.c. with 1  106 B16/F1 murine melanoma cells in the right flank. Palpable dark melanoma tumors were observed 3 days following tumor cell inoculation. Three treatment groups of 8 to 10 mice were administrated single doses of 50, 100, and 200 ACi of 212Pb-DOTA-Re(Arg11)CCMSH through the tail vein on the 4th day after tumor cell implantation. An untreated tumor control group received 100 AL of normal saline. After the administration of the therapeutic infusion, tumor size, body weight, and animal body condition were determined daily. Tumor volume was calculated by measuring the length, width, and depth of the tumors with a caliper and using the following formula: tumor volume = (length  width  depth)  k / 6. Mice were removed from the therapy study and sacrificed if body weight loss was >20% of initial body weight, tumor size exceeded 1.0 cm3, or the appearance of skin ulcerations at the tumor site. The total study period was 120 days, which was 10 times the average survival period of untreated tumor-bearing animals. Toxicity of 212PbDOTA-Re(Arg11)CCMSH to the kidneys of 100 and 200 ACi treatment groups was evaluated by pathologic examination after completion of the therapy study. The kidney and tumor site skin biopsies from therapy animals were examined by a veterinary pathologist at the University of Missouri School of Veterinary Medicine Research Animal Diagnostic Laboratory. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were obtained by using SPSS software (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL). Statistical analysis was done using Student’s t test for unpaired data. A 95% confidence level was chosen to determine the significance between untreated and treated groups, with P < 0.05 being significantly different.

Results DOTA-Re(Arg11)CCMSH was radiolabeled with 212Pb (Fig. 1) obtained from a 224Ra-212Pb/212Bi radioisotope generator. Lead-212 (t 1/2 = 10.6 hours) decays to 212Bi (t 1/2 = 1.01 hours) via h-emission that subsequently decays via a branched

Fig. 1. A schematic structure of the rhenium-cyclized peptide, Re(Arg11)CCMSH.

5617

212

Pb-DOTA-

Clin Cancer Res 2005;11(15) August 1, 2005

Cancer Therapy: Preclinical

pathway to stable 208Pb, yielding an a-particle and several h and g emissions (3, 4). The biodistribution and tumor-targeting properties of 212Pb-DOTA-Re(Arg11)CCMSH were determined in B16/F1 murine melanoma – bearing C57 mice (Table 1). 212 Pb-DOTA-Re(Arg11)CCMSH exhibited rapid accumulation and high retention in the melanoma tumors. The tumor uptake values of 212Pb-DOTA-Re(Arg11)CCMSH reached a maximum level of 13.49% injected dose per gram (%ID/g) at 5 minutes postinjection. Tumor activity levels remained constant over 4 hours, and then gradually declined to 4.59% ID/g at 24 hours postinjection. Receptor-mediated tumor uptake of 212PbDOTA-Re(Arg11)CCMSH was determined by coinjecting 10 Ag of the super potent melanotropin analogue [Nle4, D-Phe7]aMSH (NDP; ref. 19) into tumor-bearing mice. Eighty-one percent of the tumor uptake at 2 hours after dose administration of 212Pb-DOTA-Re(Arg11)CCMSH was blocked by NDP coinjection, demonstrating that tumor uptake was specific and receptor-mediated. Whole body disappearance of 212Pb-DOTARe(Arg11)CCMSH was very rapid, with f90% of the administered radioactivity washed out of the body by 2 hours postinjection. Very little radioactivity remained in blood and major organs at 2 hours postinjection, including the liver, lung, and muscle except for the kidneys, which was the primary route of excretion for 212Pb-DOTA-Re(Arg11)CCMSH. Coinjection of NDP did not affect kidney uptake, and therefore the kidney activity was likely due to nonspecific peptide retention. Biodistribution results of the radiolabeled peptide, monitored in the 212Pb and 212Bi energy windows, was not significantly different with respect to radioactivity uptake and retention in the tumor and major organs including the kidneys (data not shown). The absorbed radiation doses to tumor and normal organs from 212Pb-DOTA-Re(Arg11)CCMSH were estimated in this study based on the biodistribution data in B16/F1 murine

melanoma – bearing mice (Table 2). Dosimetry calculations were based on energy deposition from the h-decay of 212Pb as well as the a, h, and g-radiations of 212Bi (21, 22). The absorbed dose from 212Pb-DOTA-Re(Arg11)CCMSH to the B16/ F1 mouse tumor was 612 Gy/37 MBq (mCi). The high tumor dose was directly related to the rapid uptake kinetics and retention of the 212Pb-labeled peptide. Normal tissue doses were low except for the kidneys, which were estimated at 361 Gy/37 MBq. These results suggest that the kidneys will be the dose-limiting normal organ. Therapy studies were done with C57 mice inoculated s.c. with 1  106 B16/F1 cells in the right flank. Three days following tumor cell implantation, palpable dark melanoma tumors appeared. 212Pb-DOTA-Re(Arg11)CCMSH treatment was started on the 4th day after tumor cell inoculation. The effects of 212PbDOTA-Re(Arg11)CCMSH treatment on tumor growth rate and mean body weight of the mice in the therapy study are shown in Fig. 2A and B, respectively. Single-dose administrations of 50, 100, and 200 ACi of 212Pb-DOTA-Re(Arg11)CCMSH caused substantial tumor growth inhibition over the time period of the therapy study compared with the untreated tumor control group (Fig. 2A). Treated mice maintained healthy physical appearances (without diarrhea and scruff coat), normal activity levels and weight gain throughout the study period (Fig. 2B). Tumor response to 212Pb-DOTA-Re(Arg11)CCMSH treatment was dosedependent. Decreases in tumor growth rates were more pronounced for the 100 ACi treatment group compared with the 50 ACi treatment group. Two of 10 mice in the 100 ACi treatment group were tumor-free at the completion of the 120day study. The treatment group receiving the 200 ACi single dose of 212Pb-DOTA-Re(Arg11)CCMSH exhibited the best overall tumor growth inhibition (Fig. 2A). Four of nine mice in the 200 ACi treated group survived the 120-day study tumor-free, whereas two of the nine mice displayed a partial tumor

Table 1. Pharmacokinetics of 212Pb-DOTA-Re(Arg11)CCMSH in B16/F1murine melanoma C57 mice Percent injected dose/gram Tissues

5 min

30 min

1h

2h

4h

24 h

48 h

Tumor Brain Blood Heart Lung Liver Spleen Stomach Kidneys Muscle Pancreas Bone Skin

13.49 F 3.50 0.30 F 0.05 8.20 F 0.99 3.79 F 0.57 8.15 F 0.52 2.64 F 0.55 2.60 F 0.29 3.80 F 0.44 32.91 F7.04 1.91 F 0.25 2.08 F 0.11 4.61 F1.90 8.43 F 1.05

12.72 F 1.96 0.12 F 0.01 2.62 F 0.72 1.41 F 0.28 2.80 F 0.84 1.16 F 0.23 1.54 F 0.35 1.23 F 0.32 13.24 F 2.81 0.86 F 0.28 0.85 F 0.28 2.06 F 0.76 5.33 F 0.93

13.33 F 2.78 0.05 F 0.02 0.74 F 0.24 0.40 F 0.15 1.11 F 0.51 0.63 F 0.14 0.51 F 0.10 0.48 F 0.13 9.52 F 1.71 0.39 F 0.06 0.30 F 0.09 0.94 F 0.46 1.95 F 0.82

11.25 F 1.52 0.09 F 0.03 0.27 F 0.08 0.33 F 0.15 0.32 F 0.04 0.42 F 0.05 0.42 F 0.18 0.20 F 0.05 7.31 F1.26 0.16 F 0.04 0.18 F 0.08 0.63 F 0.24 0.42 F 0.04

12.84 F 2.53 0.03 F 0.05 0.08 F 0.05 0.06 F 0.04 0.40 F 0.36 0.41 F 0.13 0.30 F 0.22 0. 12 F 0.06 4.56 F 1.27 0.05 F 0.06 0.09 F 0.04 0.36 F 0.20 0.26 F 0.13

4.59 F 1.45 0.02 F 0.02 0.02 F 0.03 0.03 F 0.03 0.04 F 0.03 0.19 F 0.03 0.09 F 0.08 0.14 F 0.12 2.93 F 0.53 0.00 F 0.00 0.07 F 0.02 0.15 F 0.07 0.06 F 0.03

3.02 F 1.49 0.02 F 0.02 0.02 F 0.02 0.03 F 0.03 0.07 F 0.01 0.15 F 0.01 0.09 F 0.05 0.06 F 0.03 1.98 F 0.20 0.02 F 0.02 0.03 F 0.01 0.32 F 0.19 0.08 F 0.03

0.49 F 0.04 94.50 F 1.14

0.14 F 0.02 97.17 F 0.74

0.17 F 0.15 97.08 F 1.11

Percent injected dose Intestines Urine

3.56 F 0.12 54.98 F 3.73

1.44 F 0.32 62.11 F 4.35

0.88 F 0.43 80.14 F 9.94

0.60 F 0.14 89.70 F 2.15

NOTE: The data are presented as the percentage of injected dose per gram or as a percentage of injected dose (mean F SD, n = 4).

Clin Cancer Res 2005;11(15) August 1, 2005

5618

www.aacrjournals.org

Melanoma a-Radiotherapy

Table 2. Absorbed radiation doses from 212Pb-DOTARe(Arg11)CCMSH in B16/F1 murine melanoma ^ bearing C57 mice Organ Tumor Kidney Blood Brain Heart Lung Liver Spleen Stomach Small intestine Large intestine Muscle Pancreas

212

Pb/212Bi-DOTA-Re(Arg11)CCMSH (Gy/37 MBq) 612 361 45.5 3.07 8.13 21.0 27.1 17.2 15.0 10.8 25.8 6.14 8.67

remission response at 35 and 55 days (Fig. 3). The mean survival time for the untreated tumor control group was 14.6 F 4.4 days. The 50 ACi treated group exhibited a mean survival time of 22.0 F 5.5 days, which was significantly longer than the untreated tumor control group (P = 0.004, Fig. 3). Mean survival times of tumor mice in the 100 and 200 ACi treatment groups that did not survive the entire study were significantly extended to 28.0 F 8.8 (P = 0.002) and 49.8 F 27.3 days (P = 0.02), respectively (Fig. 3). After completion of the therapy study, the kidneys and tumor implantation sites of the treated mice that survived the study were examined. Histopathologic examination showed evidence of moderate kidney toxicity, with a thinner than normal renal cortex and damage to glomeruli and tubular structures despite lack of observational effects during the study period (Fig. 4). No evidence of secondary tumor formation was found on necropsy. Biopsies of tumor implantation sites revealed the presence of macrophage infiltrates, but no melanoma cells. Staining for the melanoma antigen S100 was also negative, indicating that the mice that survived the study were tumor-free.

the tumor. This strategy is referred to as an in vivo generator approach that produces a high dose delivery to the targeted melanoma tumor cells, whereas resulting in lower nonspecific irradiation to normal tissue. Moreover, the short half-life of 212 Bi (t 1/2 = 60.6 minutes) can be effectively extended by conjugating its longer-lived parent radionuclide of 212Pb (t 1/2 = 10.6 hours) to DOTA-Re(Arg11)CCMSH. The relative long halflife of 212Pb provides sufficient time for 212Pb-DOTARe(Arg11)CCMSH dose preparation and administration with minimal loss of activity as well as minimizing losses during in vivo tumor targeting. Biodistribution results in B16/F1 melanoma tumor – bearing mice showed that 212Pb-DOTA-Re(Arg11)CCMSH had high receptor-mediated tumor uptake and prolonged retention. Disappearance of activity from the normal organs and tissues was rapid. The majority of the administered activity was cleared through the kidneys, with f90% of the injected dose being excreted in the urine by 2 hours postinjection. As seen with other radiolabeled peptides, disappearance of activity from the kidneys was slower than the other major organs. Coinjection of excess nonradioactive NDP-MSH peptide dramatically reduced tumor uptake but did not affect radioactivity in the kidneys, demonstrating that the kidney radioactivity is nonspecific and

Discussion In this study, the pharmacokinetics and therapeutic efficacy of 212Pb-labeled DOTA-Re(Arg11)CCMSH were determined in B16/F1 murine melanoma – bearing mice. The decay scheme of 212 Pb includes 212Bi, which yields an a-particle, two h-particles, and several g-emissions upon decay. a-Particle emitters are particularly attractive for targeted radiotherapy due to high linear energy transfer properties such as localized dense ionization, which results in irreparable DNA double-strand breaks and cytotoxicity that is independent of tissue oxygen content or dose rate (3). A major advantage of using 212PbDOTA-Re(Arg11)CCMSH is that 212Pb delivers >10 times the dose per unit of administered activity compared with either 212 Bi or 213Bi alone (23). Peptide-targeted 212Pb, internalized and retained by tumor cells decays to the a-particle emitting 212 Bi, localizing the highly toxic short-range a-radiation within

www.aacrjournals.org

Fig. 2. A, growth rate of B16/F1murine melanoma tumors and; B, body weight ratios of mice post-212Pb-DOTA-Re(Arg11)CCMSH treatment. Mice were implanted with B16/F1tumor cells on day 0 and treated with 50 ACi (n), 100 ACi (E), and 200 ACi (.) of 212Pb-DOTA-Re(Arg11)CCMSH or a saline placebo (x) on day 4. Tumor measurements and mouse weights were obtained daily.

5619

Clin Cancer Res 2005;11(15) August 1, 2005

Cancer Therapy: Preclinical

Fig. 3. Survival analysis of B16/F1murine melanoma ^ bearing C57 mice. Kaplan-Meier survival curves for B16/F1murine melanoma ^ bearing mice treated with 50 ACi (E), 100 ACi (!), and 200 ACi (n) of 212Pb-DOTA-Re(Arg11)CCMSH or a saline placebo (5). Mean survival times were 14.6 F 4.4 days for untreated tumor control group, 22.0 F 5.5 days (P = 0.004) for 50 ACi treated group, 28.0 F 8.8 days (P = 0.002) for 100 ACi treated group, and 49.8 F 27.3 days (P = 0.02) for the 200 ACi treated group. Two out of 10 mice in the 100 ACi treated group and four out of nine mice in the 200 ACi treated group were free of tumor and survived the 120-day studies.

not mediated by MC1 receptor interaction. The infusion of lysine or arginine, prior to or with dose administration, has been successful in reducing nonspecific retention of activity in the kidneys (24). Coinjection of free lysine or arginine in this instance, however, did not affect kidney radioactivity levels of 212 Pb-DOTA-Re(Arg11)CCMSH. Changing lysine11 to arginine in the CCMSH peptide significantly increased its tumor uptake and reduced its kidney retention (25). However, the amino acid substitution also eliminated additional suppression of nonspecific kidney uptake of radioactivity by lysine or arginine coinfusion. It is possible that radioactivity in the kidneys may be due to free 212Bi released during the decay of 212Pb or radioactive metabolites of 212Pb-DOTA-Re(Arg11)CCMSH. It was reported that approximately one-third of the 212Bi is lost from the DOTA chelator during the transition from 212Pb to 212 Bi, due to transient oxidation states of the resulting bismuth that occur during the conversion process (26). Normal tissue toxicity of a-particle emitting radionuclides is a concern due to the high cytotoxicity of a-radiation. Dosimetry results showed that the tumor received the highest dose followed by the kidneys and blood. The toxicity of 212Bi circulating in blood is unlikely to be significant due to the short path length of a-radiation and short resonance time. However, radioactivity residing in the

kidney may result in renal toxicity. Acute radiation nephritis was reported in Cynomolgus monkeys treated with escalating doses of an a-particle emitting 225Ac-HuM195 monoclonal antibody complex (27). Estimated kidney doses of 9 to 13 Gy to the renal cortex from 225Ac and its a-particle-emitting daughters, including 213Bi, resulted in tubular epithelial necrosis and marked regeneration. Accumulation of 213Bi or 212Bi in the kidneys was consistent with biodistribution studies of nonchelated or free radiobismuth (28). Intravital chelation of 212Bi has been one method proposed to reduce radioactivity in the kidneys. DMPS intravital chelation of free 212Bi generated by circulating 212Pb radiolabeled antibodies was shown to reduce bismuth activity in the kidneys (29). The extended circulation time of the 212Pb radiolabeled antibodies would allow ample time for the generation of free 212Bi in vivo, allowing an intravital chelation strategy to be effective. However, the rapid pharmacokinetics of small radiolabeled peptides dramatically minimizes the amount of free 212Bi generated in vivo. Two hours postinjection, f90% of the injected dose was in the urine, with the majority of the remaining activity sequestered in the tumor. It is unlikely that 212 Bi freed during circulation will contribute significantly to the kidney dose because the residence time of the radiolabeled peptide in the blood is very short. Tumor and normal organ uptake and retention of radiolabeled DOTA-Re(Arg11)CCMSH monitored in both the 212Pb and 212Bi energy windows was identical. A higher 212Bi to 212Pb uptake ratio in the kidneys would be expected if a significant amount of 212Bi was released from the circulating peptide and sequestered in the kidneys. Efflux of radioactivity from tumor cells is also unlikely to contribute significantly to circulating levels of 212Bi. Based on tumor uptake and retention studies in vitro, >25% of radioactivity was released from cells 3 hours postinternalization of radiolabeled [DOTA]-Re(Arg11)CCMSH (17). Biodistribution of 212Pb-DOTA-Re(Arg11)CCMSH presented in Table 1, showed that there was no significant difference in tumor retention of activity in vivo during the first 4 hours postinjection, whereas activity levels in the blood dropped rapidly. If activity was effluxing from the tumor, one would expect decreasing activity levels in the tumor over the first 4 hours after dose administration. Radiobismuth deposition in the kidneys is more likely to arise from nonspecific retention of radiolabeled peptide or injection of 212Bi generated during peptide labeling and purification. Bismuth-212 generated before injection can be effectively chelated by the addition of diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid or EDTA to the dose immediately prior to administration. Modification of the linkage between the peptide and DOTA moieties in 212Pb-DOTA-Re(Arg11)CCMSH is likely to reduce renal retention of the radiolabeled peptide. The

Fig. 4. Kidney histology sections from an untreated C57 mouse (A) and C57 mice treated with 100 ACi (B) and 200 ACi (C) of 212 Pb-DOTA-Re(Arg11)CCMSH 100 days post-dose administration. Bar, 0.5 mm.

Clin Cancer Res 2005;11(15) August 1, 2005

5620

www.aacrjournals.org

Melanoma a-Radiotherapy

introduction of negatively charged amino acids between DOTA and the recyclized peptide was shown to dramatically decrease nonspecific kidney retention of 177Lu-DOTA-Re(Arg11)CCMSH (30). It is very likely that the renal uptake of 212Pb-DOTARe(Arg11)CCMSH can be reduced by employing the same strategy in the future investigations. Furthermore, a multipledose radiotherapy regimen may result in a lower kidney dose, whereas maintaining high therapeutic efficacy (31 – 34). The therapeutic efficacy of peptide-targeted a-therapy was greater than peptide-targeted 188Re h-emitter therapy in the B16/F1 solid tumor melanoma mouse model (31). Tumorbearing mice treated with single 200 or 600 ACi doses of 188Re(Arg11)CCMSH complex exhibited no improvement in mean survival over the non – treatment control group. Only mice treated with 2  400 ACi doses of 188Re-(Arg11)CCMSH displayed an improvement in mean survivability. However, there were no complete remissions or durable cures. In the 212 Pb-DOTA-Re(Arg11)CCMSH therapy studies reported here, all treated groups of melanoma mice exhibited significant (P < 0.05, Fig. 3) improvement in mean survival over the non – treatment control group. Moreover, 20% and 45% of the mice receiving 100 or 200 ACi of 212Pb-DOTA-Re(Arg11)CCMSH survived the study disease-free. The differences in therapeutic

efficacies are likely due to the differences in radiation decay properties and tumor size. Rhenium-188 is a high-energy h-emitter, which may have resulted in much of its radiation being deposited outside the tumor volume. High-energy h-emitters, such as 188Re and 90Y, are probably better suited for large tumor volumes, as exemplified by targeted radiotherapy with radiolabeled octreotide analogues (35). In this study, 212Pb-DOTA-Re(Arg11)CCMSH treatment significantly decreased tumor growth rates and extended the mean survival time of melanoma-bearing mice in the B16/F1 murine melanoma model. Targeted radiotherapy with short path length high – linear energy transfer 212Bi a-particles focused energy deposition within tumor cells yielding dramatic improvements in melanoma therapeutic efficacies. 212PbDOTA-Re(Arg11)CCMSH seems to be a very promising radiopharmaceutical for targeted radionuclide therapy of melanoma.

Acknowledgments We thank the MU Research Animal Diagnostic Laboratory for histopathology support, Drs. Wynn A. Volkert, Susan L. Deutscher, and Richard Testa for their helpful discussions, and Drs. Fabio Gallazzi and Donna Whitener for their technical assistance.

References 1. Balch CM, Soong SJ, Gershenwald JE, et al. Prognostic factors analysis of 17,600 melanoma patients: validation of the American Joint Committee on Cancer melanoma staging system. J Clin Oncol 2001;19: 3622 ^ 34. 2. Seegenschmiedt MH, Keilholz L, Altendorf-Hofman A, et al. Palliative radiotherapy for recurrent and metastatic malignant melanoma: prognostic factors for tumor response and long-term outcome: a 20-year study. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1999;44:607 ^ 18. 3. McDevitt MR, Sgouros G, Finn RD, et al. Radioimmunotherapy with a-emitting nuclides. Eur J Nucl Med 1998;25:1341 ^ 51. 4. Hassfjell S, Brechbiel MW. The development of the a-particle emitting radionuclides 212Bi and 213Bi and their decay chain related radionuclides, for therapeutic applications. Chem Rev 2001;101:2019 ^ 36. 5. Larsen RH, Akabani G, Welsh P, Zalutsky MR. The cytotoxicity and microdosimetry of Astatine-211labeled chimeric monoclonal antibodies in human glioma and melanoma cells. Radiat Res1998;149:155 ^ 62. 6. Zalutsky M, Bigner D. Radioimmunotherapy with aparticle emitting radioimmunoconjugates. Acta Oncol 1996;35:373 ^ 9. 7. Nikula T, McDevitt MR, Finn RD, et al. a-Emitting bismuth cyclohexylbenzyl DTPA constructs of recombinant humanized anti-CD33 antibodies: pharmacokinetics, bioactivity, toxicity and chemistry. J Nucl Med 1999;40:166 ^ 76. 8. Zhang M, Yao Z, Garmestani K, et al. Pretargeting radioimmunotherapy of a murine model of adult T-cell leukemia with the a-emitting radionuclide, bismuth 213. Blood 2002;100:208 ^ 16. 9. Kennel SJ, Mirzadeh S, Eckelman WC, et al.Vasculartargeted radioimmunotherapy with the a-particle emitter 211At. Radiat Res 2002;157:633 ^ 41. 10. Horak E, Hartman F, Garmestani K, et al. Radioimmunotherapy targeting of HER2/neu oncoprotein on ovarian tumor using lead-212-DOTA-AE1. J Nucl Med 1997;38:1944 ^ 50. 11. McDevitt MR, Ma D, Lai LT, et al.Tumor therapy with targeted atomic nanogenerators. Science 2001;294: 1537 ^ 40. 12. Jurcic JG, Larson SM, Sgouros G, et al. Targeted a particle immunotherapy for myeloid leukemia. Blood 2002;100:1233 ^ 9. 13. Zalutsky MR. Current status of therapy of solid

www.aacrjournals.org

tumors: brain tumor therapy. J Nucl Med 2005;46: 151S ^ 6. 14. Giblin MF, Wang NN, Hoffman TJ, Jurisson SS, QuinnTP. Design and characterization of a-melanotropin peptide analogs cyclized through rhenium and technetium metal coordination. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1998;95:12814 ^ 8. 15. Chen J, Cheng Z, Hoffman TJ, Jurisson SS, Quinn TP. Melanoma-targeting properties of (99m)technetium-labeled cyclic a-melanocyte-stimulating hormone peptide analogues. Cancer Res 2000;60: 5649 ^ 58. 16. Miao Y, Whitener D, Feng W, Owen NK, Chen J-Q, Quinn TP. Evaluation of the human melanoma targeting properties of radiolabeled a-melanocyte stimulating hormone peptide analogues. Bioconjug Chem 2003;14:1177 ^ 84. 17. Chen J-Q, Cheng Z, Owen NK, et al. Evaluation of an 111 In-DOTA-Rhenium cyclized a-MSH analog: a novel cyclic-peptide analog with improved tumor targeting properties. J Nucl Med 2001;42:1847 ^ 55. 18. Atcher RN, Friedman AM, Hines JJ. An improved generator for the production of Pb-212 and Bi-212 from Ra-224. Appl Radiat Isot 1988;39:283 ^ 6. 19. Sawyer TK, Sanfilippo PJ, Hruby VJ, et al. [Nle4, D-Phe7] a-melanocyte stimulating hormone: a highly potent a-melanotropin with ultralong biological activity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1980;77:5754 ^ 8. 20. HuiTE, Fisher DR, Kuhn JA, et al. A mouse model for calculating cross-organ h doses from yttrium-90labeled immunoconjugates. Cancer 1994;73:951 ^ 7. 21. Beatty BG, Kuhn JA, Hui TE, Fisher DR,Williams LE, Beatty JD. Application of the cross-organ h dose method for tissue dosimetry in tumor-bearing mice treated with a 90Y-labeled immunoconjugate. Cancer 1994;73:958 ^ 65. 22. Howell RW, Goddu SM, Narra VR, Fisher DR, Schenter RE, Rao DV. Radiotoxicity of gadolinium148 and radium-223 in mouse testes: relative biological effectiveness of a-particle emitters in vivo. Radiat Res 1997;147:342 ^ 8. 23. Leichner PK. Radiation dosimetry of monoclonal antibodies: practical considerations. In: Henkin RE, Boles MA, Dillehay GL, et al., editors. Nuclear Medicine. St. Louis: Mosby; 1996. p. 558 ^ 62. 24. Kobayashi H, Yoo TM, Kim IS, et al. L-lysine effectively blocks renal uptake of I-125- or Tc-99m labeled

5621

anti-tac disulfide-stabilized Fv fragment. Cancer Res 1996;56:3788 ^ 95. 25. Cheng Z, Chen J, Owen N, Miao Y, Quinn TP, Jurisson SS. Modification of the structure of a metallopeptide: synthesis and biological evaluation of 111In labeled DOTA conjugated rhenium cyclized a-MSH analogs. J Med Chem 2002;45:3048 ^ 56. 26. Mirzadeh S, Kumar K, Gansow OA. The chemical fate of Bi-212-DOTA formed by h-decay of Pb(DOTA). Radiochim Acta 1993;60:1 ^ 10. 27. Miederer M, McDevitt MR, Sgouros G, Kramer K, Cheung NKV, Scheinberg DA. Pharmacokinetics, dosimetry, and toxicity of the targetable atomic generator, 225Ac-HuM195, in nonhuman primates. J Nucl Med 2004;45:129 ^ 37. 28. Newton D,Talbot RJ, Priest ND. Human biokinetics of injected bismuth-207. Hum Exp Toxicol 2001;20: 601 ^ 9. 29. Jones SB, Tiffany LJ, Garmestani K, Gansow OA, Kozak RW. Evaluation of dithiol chelating agents as potential adjuvants for anti-IL-2 receptor lead or bismuth a radioimmunotherapy. Nucl Med Biol 1996;23: 105 ^ 13. 30. Miao Y, Whitener D, Owen NK, Quinn TP. Reducing renal uptake of 177Lu labeled a-melanocyte stimulating hormone analogue through coupling a negatively charged amino acid to N-terminus of the peptide. J Nucl Med 2004;45:(Suppl) P52. 31. MiaoY, Owen NK, Fisher DR, HoffmanTJ, Quinn TP. Therapeutic efficacy of a 188Re labeled a-melanocyte stimulating hormone peptide analogue in murine and human melanoma-bearing mouse models. J Nucl Med 2005;46:121 ^ 9. 32. Anderson CJ, Jones LA, Bass LA, et al. Radiotherapy, toxicity and dosimetry of coper-64 TETA-octreotide in tumor bearing rats. J Nucl Med 1998;39:1944 ^ 51. 33. Lewis JS, Lewis MR, Cutler PD, et al. Radiotherapy and dosimetry of 64Cu-TETA-Tyr3-octreotate in a somatostatin receptor-positive, tumor-bearing rat model. Clin Cancer Res 1999;5:3608 ^ 16. 34. Wessels B. Summary and perspectives on kidney dose-response to radionuclide therapy. Cancer Biother Radiopharm 2004;19:388 ^ 90. 35. de Jong M,Valkema R, Jamar F, et al. Somatostatin receptor-targeted radionuclide therapy of tumors: preclinical and clinical findings. Semin Nucl Med 2002; 32:133 ^ 40.

Clin Cancer Res 2005;11(15) August 1, 2005