Multi-layer Electrospun Nanofiber Mats with Chemical

2 downloads 0 Views 450KB Size Report
chemical and welfare agent detector textile materials. ... color change and are designated as thermochromic and photochromic systems [2, 3]. The degree of ...
Multi-layer Electrospun Nanofiber Mats with Chemical Agent Sensor Function Sahar Golmohammadi Rostami; M. Sajad Sorayani Bafghi; Roohollah Bagherzadeh; Masoud Latifi; Mohsen Gorji,.

Abstract: Electrospun nanofiber web were developed to examine the feasibility of developing chemical and welfare agent detector textile materials. Some parameters of nanofiber mats, including the polymer type, time of electrospinning and the polymer solution concentration, were designed to change and pH detection properties of specimens were compared. Multilayered electrospun nanofiber mats equipped with pH sensitive dyes showed good performance in pH detecting property that opens up new possibilities for using in the protective garment application as the chemical and welfare agent detectors. It was also found that the developed electrospun fibers due to their porous structure and fiber diameter distribution are stable for chemical welfare detection in the form of gas.

Keyword: Nanofiber, Electrospinnig, pH sensor, Protective clothing.

1. Introduction It is essential to aware about different chemical substances, which is used in many contexts of industries and have considerable effect on environment and human's life. The first step to decrease destructive effects of being contact with these types of chemical material is to recognizing and knowing about their existence. Among several methods for recognizing these ingredients, the concept of colorimetric has gained much interest in academic world. In this method, the act of response between chemical ingredient and the used material in sensors cause the color change. Colorimetric detection is a wet chemistry technique formulated to

indicate the presence of a chemical agent by a chemical reaction that causes a color change when agents come into contact with certain solutions or substrates [1]. There are many different triggers which can cause a color change in the fibrous materials. The most known chameleon fibrous materials have temperature and light as stimulus for the color change and are designated as thermochromic and photochromic systems [2, 3]. The degree of acidity is, however, an important parameter in daily live and a pH-sensitive sensor could, therefore, be very useful. The most common colorimetric detectors come in the form of detection tubes, papers or tickets, each of which can detect nerve, blister and blood agents [1]. The application of pH-sensitive dyes to textile materials leads to flexible and easy-tohandle sensors which are able to give a first, immediately visible signal. Synthetic polymer systems with very similar attributes are often prepared for a broad range of applications, such as responsive bio interfaces that are functionally similar to natural surfaces; controlled drugdelivery and release systems; coatings that are capable of interacting with and responding to their environment; composite materials that actuate and mimic the action of muscles; and thin films and particles that are capable of sensing very small concentrations of analyses. In the last decade, smart textiles have become the subject of many studies all over the world. Within the group of smart textiles, a growing interest in color change materials, or so called chameleon textiles, is recognized. There are several methods to identify these chemical ingredients. Every method has some advantages and disadvantages [1-5]. An effective method must have some parameters such as detection capability, selectivity, sensitivity, response time, and portability. One of the approaches for improving the detection capability of pH sensors could be increasing the surface area of the sensor. Nanofibers due to their fascinating properties such as porous structure, interconnectivity of pores between fibers, and large surface are is one of the interesting materials as a pH sensor. Among all approaches for producing the nanofiber mats, electcrospinning have received large attention in many different fields [6-13]. Electrospinning as an effective and promising technique for the production of nanofibers provides a mat of extremely fine fibers with small pore size and high surface area. Electrospun nanofibers may have a broad application in composite nonwoven structures in traditional markets. The small fiber diameter and porous structure of the nanofiber mats gives rise to a large specific surface area. This is advantageous in a wide variety of applications such as high performance filters, scaffold in tissue engineering, separation membranes, reinforcement in composite materials, templates for the preparation of functional nanotubes, and many others [2, 6-14]. One of the main attractive specifications of electrospun mats in the area of pH sensitive materials could be the direct application of

electrospun multi-layered mats to garments. Up to now, different type of pH detector introduced for different applications [15-18], but direct application of pH sensitive electrospun webs to garment systems would eliminate costly manufacturing steps and solve seam-sealing problems that have been limiting factors in protective garments. The electrospun fibrous structure has shown some unique characteristics such as an extremely high-surface area, high porosity and small pore size. These properties can be useful in a whole range of applications, including pH detector, since exchange of liquids and gases in the environment can be done in an effective way. The small fiber diameter and porous structure of the nanofiber mats gives rise to a large specific surface area which is the suitable option for physical contact of chemical welfare and the pH detector dye within the fiber structure in such a quicker way than the normal fibers.

Meanwhile, the garment using the change of its color can easily detect changes in the environmental pH. Easy usage and a quick response time are the most important advantages of this method [19-22]. The electrospinning surface is produced to be sensitive to some characteristic components such as destructive chemical ingredients. The influences of temperature and light are unavoidable. Therefore, color changing must be introduced for the whole ranges of variation. New development of color changing of textile material is incorporation of a pH-indicator dye into a nanofibrous structure. It is possible to add dying indicators into structure of polymer solution before electrospinning. In the present study, we report our attempt to incorporate pH indicator dyes in nanocomposite fibers using electrospinning technique in a way that structural parameters of the resulted material is suitable for detecting the chemical welfares in form of gas. This paper focuses on assessing color changing the nanofibrous mats with different structural and chemical bases with their environment change of pH. Since different polymer can be used for different application, we used two polymers in this research: Nylon 6 (polyamide 6) and Polycaprolatone (PCL). Nylon 6 is a proper polymer for military application since it can be placed or be stitched to NBC protection clothing for visual alarming and PCL, as a biocompatible polymer, can be used as a patch for biomedical application. Characteristics of the fabricated sensor including large specific surface area, appropriate fiber diameter and porous structure of the nanofiber mats were designed to achieve the proper performances of the sensor comparing to the other forms of the polymeric sensors such as film and paper based sensors. Another important characteristic of fabricated sensor is the ability of using them in the protective clothing sector, since they can be easily distort during the wearing without any compelling the comfort properties of clothing. A comparison

between nanofiber pH-sensitive and dye coated conventional fabric also was carried out to show the differences of the above mentioned characteristics.

2. Materials and methods: 2.1. Materials Polycaprolactone (PCL, 80000 MW, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) was dissolved in Chloroform/Methanol (3:1) (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) at a concentration ranged from 14 to 20 %wt polymer in solvent. Polyamide 6 (PA) was supplied by Sigma-Aldrich. Different Polyamide solutions solved in formic acid were prepared with different polymer concentrations and the optimum solution was used for further analysis. The pH-indicator dyes (C18H14N4O, MW: 302.33 g/mol, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO), formic acid and hydrochloric acid were also supplied by Merck.

2.2. Methods Electrospinning of nanofibers was performed in a horizontal electrospinning setup (Fanavaran Nano-Meghyas Company, Figure 1). It consisted of a syringe positioned horizontally with its needle, a precisely-controlled syringe pump, a high voltage power supply capable of 0–25 kV, and a grounded collector. Upon applying a high voltage (20 kV), a fluid jet was ejected from the tip of the needle. As the jet accelerated toward a target, which was placed at 15 cm from the syringe tip, the solvent evaporated and nanofibers were collected on an aluminum foil substrate. The mass flow rate of the solutions was 0.3 mL/h for PCL and 0.5 for Polyamide solutions to produce uniform nanofiber mats. Descriptions of samples with different parameters produced in this research are given in Table 1.

Figure 1. Schematic of electrospinning setup used to producing nanofiber mats To make the fibers pH sensor within the fibrous mat, pH-indicator dyes blended with polymer solution for 2 hrs before electrospinning with different concentrations. After that aqueous dye–PCL blend solutions were electrospun to make the fibrous mats, in which dyes were confined. After a pre-study of the best volume percent of dyes in the polymer solution, 8% v/v had chosen to make the fiber enough sensitive and uniform. To evaluate the effect of nanofibers and a comparison between the nanofibers and conventional fabrics, same appropriate fabric was used and the dye was coated on one side. The microstructure and the morphology of the nanofiber mats were characterized by using scanning electron microscope (SEM, XL30, Philips Co.). All samples were gold coated (Bal-tec SCD50 sputter coater) and the images were taken at an acceleration voltage of 20 kV. The fiber diameter was measured using image processing software (ImageJ, National Institutes of Health, USA). Light stability and fastness of sensors were evaluated according to 105-A03:1993 standard. Table1. Description of samples used in this research Sample code

Polymer

Weight percentage(wt.%)

Dye percentage

Production conditions

SA1

PA

15

5

Distance:15 cm, flow rate: 10 ml/h, Voltage: 20 kV

PA

15

7

Distance:15 cm, flow rate: 10 ml/h, Voltage: 20 kV

SA3

PA

15

9

Distance:15 cm, flow rate: 10 ml/h, Voltage: 20 kV

SA4

PA

15

13

Distance:15 cm, flow rate: 10 ml/h, Voltage: 20 kV

SA5

PCL

12

5

Distance: 15 cm, flow rate: 1.2 ml/h, Voltage: 21 kV

PCL

12

7

Distance: 15 cm, flow rate: 1.2 ml/h, Voltage: 21 kV

SA2

SA6

SA7 SA8

PCL

12

9

Distance: 15 cm, flow rate: 1.2 ml/h, Voltage: 21 kV

PCL

12

13

Distance: 15 cm, flow rate: 1.2 ml/h, Voltage: 21 kV

3. Results and discussions 3.1. Morphology study of the electrospun nanofiber mats Diameters of the electrospun fibers were analyzed from the SEM images using ImageJ software. Typical SEM photographs of nanofiber mats with and without pH-indicator dyes are shown in Figures 2 and 3. Non-uniform nanofibers with different defects such as (beads, and solution spray dots) were produced in some process conditions suggesting that solution or process parameters are not suited to make a uniform jet during the electrospinning, which after some parameter optimization of electrospinning process (including polymer in solution concentration, applied voltage, nozzle to collector distance) to fabricate a uniform fiber mats without any structural defects such as beeds, (Figure 2-9). To measure the average diameter of nanofibrous mats, 100 fibers in the SEM micrograph were selected randomly and the average value of them was considered as the average fiber diameter. The average fiber diameter of 91 nm and fiber diameter distribution shown in Figure 3, and 4 were measured for PA samples and the average fiber diameter of 87 nm and fiber diameter distribution shown in Figure 6, and 7 for PCL samples. Although the pH-indicator dyes did not have cause much influences on the diameter of nanofibers, it could be asserted that the negative result of adding pH-indicator dyes in the solution are reduced considering the fact that by adding the pH-indicator dye the viscosity of solution was found out to be increased, consequently. In addition, the electrospinning process was encounter with some problems like having frequent droplets in front of the capillary. In the other hand, much incorporation of the pH-indicator dyes in the fiber structure, expected to have more sensitivity to the change of the environmental pH. Therefore, different percentages of the pH-indicator dye were used in this study.

By comparing the results of fiber diameter distributions (Figures 4, 5, 8, and 9), it can be found that the pH-indicator dyes had the same result in two degradable and non-degradable polymers (PCL and PA polymers) and the differences are not considerable for all samples generally. Some variations were found for some samples which could be due to the changing in the electrospinning conditions because of environmental changes during the process.

Figure 2 . Typical SEM micrograph of PA nanofiber mats without pH-indicator (SA3 sample without Dye)

Figure 4. Fiber diameter (nm) distribution for PA mats without pH-indicator (SA3 sample)

Figure 3. Typical SEM micrograph of PA nanofiber mats with pH-indicator (SA3 sample )

Figure 5. Fiber diameter (nm) distribution for PA mats with pH-indicator (SA3 sample)

Figure 6. Typical SEM micrograph of PCL nanofiber mats without pH-indicator (SA7 sample)

Figure 7. Typical SEM micrograph of PCL nanofiber mats with pH-indicator (SA7 sample)

Figure 8. Fiber diameter (nm) distribution for PCL mats without pH-indicator (SA7 sample)

Figure 9. Fiber diameter (nm) distribution for PCL mats with pH-indicator (SA7 sample)

3.2. Halochromic behavior of fabricated samples The investigation of the halochromic behavior of pH-indicator encapsulated nanofiber mats were performed by dropping the aqueous pH baths on the surface of the samples. Since the possibility of developing a fabric based sensor with the same properties of normal fabric along with pH-sensory function was our main goal in this research, we only compared and optimized the structure and morphology of the nanofibrous mats with each other, although a comparison has been made with the results of conversional fabrics. Electrospun nanfibrous with incorporated pH-sensitive indicator are expected to show alternation in the environment with different pH due to their highly porous structure. This environment can be the aqua environment, liquid or a gas with high concentration which caused infection. In this research,

we performed a dropping test of pH bath on the samples, which is the normal condition for testing the sensitivity of samples in comparing with the aqua and gas environment due to our limitation of the testing. Figure 10 shows the color transition observed almost instantaneously upon exposure to a drop of pH bath. Both PA and PCL samples showed a color transition with pH from orange to light blue.

A) Electrospun PA nanofibers with pH-indicator

B) Electrospun PCL nanofibers with pH-indicator

C) pH-indicator dye coated conventional fabric Figure 10. Colorimetric transition of A) PA, B) PCL samples upon exposure to various pH bath and C) pHindicator dye coated conventional fabric.

As can be seen from figure 10, PCL and PA samples showed rapid color transition upon exposure to only one drop of the pH bath. These could be due to highly porous structure of nanofiber mats and high surface area of the mats due to their nanoscale’s constituents. Nanofibers have a great aspect ratio of surface to volume ration in comparison to micro fibers and conventional fibers. Due to the more surface of nanofibers, higher surface energy and reactivity are the result of this feature. Moreover, high porosity is another outstanding feature

of nanofibers in comparison to the other conventional fibers. This can be resulted from the fact that these improvements of pH_sensitive for nanofiber base sensor could be based on improvement of porosity [23-25] and some physical stability properties such as color fastness compared with conventional fabric. Color fastness of the samples and the strength against wet abrasion was determined according to the 105-A03:1993 and ISO105 standard respectively. The results for nanofiber and conventional fabric, presented in Table 2, showed that the fastness to rubbing of the samples significantly decreased with increasing dye concentration. Only with a relatively low concentration (5% and 7%) could good rubbing fastness values be obtained. The dye molecules are strongly bound at lower dye concentrations within the fiber structure. However, at higher concentrations, weaker interactions are present resulting in a higher dye release due to the rubbing. Moreover, regarding the aforementioned properties of nanofibers, having decreased from micro scale to nano scale of fibers makes a high ratio of surface to volume. As a first result the more surface it has, the more stability will achieve between the dye and fiber’s surface. To put in other point view, for an even surface of fiber the lower dye is required in case of using electrospun nanofibers compared to conventional fibers. On the other hand, by decreasing the volume and increasing the surface, lower percentage of dye is penetrated in depth and more percentage of dye is used in the surface and the main result is the lower usage of dye and it is considered as an advantage of sensor. The studies on the fabric based pH_sensitive materials have been done and due to the costly process and instability of dye pigment in the fabric structure, it could not achieve the desired pH_sensitive sensor (figure 10-C). Further to the production nanofibers, the dye will be dispersed in the solution and applied pH_sensitve dye is not easily removable in comparison to the fabric. The experiments of putting different fluids on the sensor such as water drops, sulfuric acid drops were done and the result had shown that no changes had occurred on the sensor with water drops, since water has neutral pH level. Color fastness to artificial light (Xenon arc fading) of samples was also evaluated and the results showed no color changing after 48 hrs. of continuous lighting under the standard condition (Table 2). Table 2. Assessment of the color fastness using a grey scale of PA, PCL and conventional fabric (CF) samples Sample code

Sample color

Color staining fastness

Color fastness to light

wet

dry

after 48 hrs

SA 1

ORANGE

4

4-5

No changing

SA 2

ORANGE

4

4-5

No changing

SA 3

ORANGE

2-3

4

No changing

SA 4

ORANGE

2

3

No changing

SA 5

ORANGE

4-5

5

No changing

SA 6

ORANGE

4

4-5

No changing

SA 7

ORANGE

2

3-4

No changing

SA 8

ORANGE

2

3

No changing

CF

ORANGE

1

3

No changing

4. Conclusion The halochromic coloration of nanofibres was realized by directly incorporating the dyes into the fiber structure, which was shown to be highly effective. A clear and fast color shift was observed by changing the environmental pH which was attributed to the high porosity of the electrospun fibers and their nanoscale properties. Furthermore, by comparing the obtained results, it can be concluded that, generally no differences were observed between the pH sensing behavior of PA and PCL samples. Although the nature of the polymer type may have an influence on the halochromic properties, the effect of fibrous structure of the both polymeric material used in this study had the dominant role. The promising results from the pH-detecting experiments demonstrated the possibility to develop a convenient and portable sensory system (e.g. as a strip in the clothing system) for gas and chemical agent detection which PA nanofiber detector has a better cumulative performance in terms of stability and sensitivity.

Acknowledgments The support provided by the ATMT Research Institute, Amirkabir University of Technology and INSF (Grant No. 91051749& 92039994) are highly appreciated.

References: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5.

Sun, Y. and K. Y. Ong, Detection Technologies for Chemical Warfare Agents and Toxic Vapors. 2004: CRC Press. Sariişik, M., L. Van der Schueren, and K. De Clerck, Textile materials with a pH‐sensitive function. International Journal of Clothing Science and Technology, 2011. 23(4): p. 269-274. Mather, R.R., Intelligent textiles. Review of Progress in Coloration and Related Topics, 2001. 31(1): p. 36-41. Van der Schueren, L. and K. De Clerck, The Use of pH-indicator Dyes for pH-sensitive Textile Materials. Textile Research Journal, 2010. 80(7): p. 590-603. Yuqing, M., C. Jianrong, and F. Keming, New technology for the detection of pH. Journal of Biochemical and Biophysical Methods, 2005. 63(1): p. 1-9.

6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20.

21. 22. 23. 24.

Bagherzadeh, R., et al., Transport properties of multi-layer fabric based on electrospun nanofiber mats as a breathable barrier textile material. Textile Research Journal, 2012. 82(1): p. 70-76. Bagherzadeh, R., et al., Three-dimensional pore structure analysis of Nano/Microfibrous scaffolds using confocal laser scanning microscopy. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A, 2013. 101A(3): p. 765-774. Bagherzadeh, R., et al., A theoretical analysis and prediction of pore size and pore size distribution in electrospun multilayer nanofibrous materials. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A, 2013. 101A(7): p. 2107-2117. Bagherzadeh, R., et al., Experimental verification of theoretical prediction of fiber to fiber contacts in electrospun multilayer nano-microfibrous assemblies: Effect of fiber diameter and network porosity. Journal of Industrial Textiles, 2014. 43(4): p. 483-495. Bagherzadeh, R., M. Latifi, and L. Kong, Three-dimensional pore structure analysis of polycaprolactone nano-microfibrous scaffolds using theoretical and experimental approaches. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A, 2014. 102(3): p. 903-910. Bagherzadeh, R., et al., The application of Cd Se/ZnS quantum dots and confocal laser scanning microscopy for three-dimensional imaging of nanofibrous structures. Journal of Industrial Textiles, 2014. 43(4): p. 496-510. Gheibi, A., et al., Electrical power generation from piezoelectric electrospun nanofibers membranes: electrospinning parameters optimization and effect of membranes thickness on output electrical voltage. Journal of Polymer Research, 2014. 21(11): p. 1-14. Gheibi, A., et al., Piezoelectric electrospun nanofibrous materials for self-powering wearable electronic textiles applications. Journal of Polymer Research, 2014. 21(7): p. 1-7. Bafqi, M.S.S., R. Bagherzadeh, and M. Latifi, Fabrication of composite PVDF-ZnO nanofiber mats by electrospinning for energy scavenging application with enhanced efficiency. Journal of Polymer Research, 2015. 22(7): p. 1-9. Zhang, C., et al., A novel two-nozzle electrospinning process for preparing microfiber reinforced pH-sensitive nano-membrane with enhanced mechanical property. European Polymer Journal, 2011. 47(12): p. 2228-2233. Agarwal, A., et al., Development of universal pH sensing electrospun nanofibers. Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical, 2012. 161(1): p. 1097-1101. Zhang, L., et al., Synthesis and characterization of novel phenolphthalein immobilized halochromic fiber. Reactive and Functional Polymers, 2009. 69(4): p. 234-239. Van der Schueren, L., et al., The development of polyamide 6.6 nanofibres with a pHsensitive function by electrospinning. European Polymer Journal, 2010. 46(12): p. 2229-2239. Perrotton, C., et al., A reliable, sensitive and fast optical fiber hydrogen sensor based on surface plasmon resonance. Optics express, 2013. 21(1): p. 382-390. Sharma, T., et al. Aligned electrospun PVDF-TrFE nanofibers for flexible pressure sensors on catheter. in Solid-State Sensors, Actuators and Microsystems (TRANSDUCERS & EUROSENSORS XXVII), 2013 Transducers & Eurosensors XXVII: The 17th International Conference on. 2013. IEEE. Wejinya, U.C., et al., Carbon Nanofiber Nanoelectrode Array: Effect of Process Conditions on Reliability. Nanotechnology, IEEE Transactions on, 2013. 12(1): p. 101-107. Fu, J., et al., Laccase biosensor based on electrospun copper/carbon composite nanofibers for catechol detection. Sensors, 2014. 14(2): p. 3543-3556. Steyaert, I., et al., Dye immobilization in halochromic nanofibers through blend electrospinning of a dye-containing copolymer and polyamide-6. Polymer Chemistry, 2015. 6(14): p. 2685-2694. Huang, Z.-M., et al., A review on polymer nanofibers by electrospinning and their applications in nanocomposites. Composites science and technology, 2003. 63(15): p. 2223-2253.

25.

Teo, W. and S. Ramakrishna, A review on electrospinning design and nanofibre assemblies. Nanotechnology, 2006. 17(14): p. R89.