Neumann-Series Solution of Fractional Differential Equation

1 downloads 0 Views 143KB Size Report
fk0;k1;ءءء;kmہ1g denotes the summation over all the sets of fk0; k1; ءءء ; kmہ1g satisfying kl 2 0. Zn for all l 2 0. Zmہ1 and. Pmہ1 l¼0 kl ¼ n. The last equality in (25) ...
Interdisciplinary Information Sciences Vol. 16, No. 1 (2010) 127–137 #Graduate School of Information Sciences, Tohoku University ISSN 1340-9050 print/1347-6157 online DOI 10.4036/iis.2010.127

Neumann-Series Solution of Fractional Differential Equation Tohru MORITA 1;  and Ken-ichi SATO2 1

2

3-4-34 Nakayama-Yoshinari, Aoba-ku, Sendai 989-3203, Japan College of Engineering, Nihon University, Koriyama 963-8642, Japan Received February 6, 2009; final version accepted October 1, 2009

For the initial-value problem of a fractional differential equation with constant coefficients, the solution is given by the Neumann series for the corresponding Volterra integral equation, and is expressed by a generalized MittagLeffler function. The derivation is presented in the style of operational calculus, which is formulated by distribution theory. KEYWORDS: fractional differential equation, Neumann series, generalized Mittag-Leffler function, operational calculus, distribution theory

1. Introduction The fractional derivative and fractional differential equation have long been discussed; see e.g. [4, 8, 12]. Recently its applicability is discussed, e.g. in the problem of viscoelastic behaviors of polymeric substances [3, 12, 15]. In Chapter 3 in the book [12] and in [9–11], the existence and uniqueness of a fractional differential equation (fDE) were proved with the aid of the corresponding facts on a Volterra integral equation. It is known that the unique solution of a Volterra integral equation is given by the Neumann series [13, p. 146]. In the present paper, we study the fDE with constant coefficients which are simply called fDE below in this paper. The solution of simple fDE was given in [2, 6], with the aid of Mikusin´ski’s operational calculus [7], where the operators are differentiation and convolution with a function. We can regard the calculation as an application of the Neumann series to the Volterra integral equations corresponding to the simple fDE. In a recent paper by Morita and Sato [11], the initial-value problem of an fDE was studied in terms of distribution theory, where the description was given in the style of classical operational calculus. In that theory, distributions are right-sided distributions in the space D0R , which consists of regular distributions and their derivatives, where regular distributions in D0R are those locally integrable functions in R that have a support bounded on the left. The operators which appear in solving an fDE in D0R are the fractional integrals, fractional differentiations, their linear combinations, their inverses, which always exist, and their products. These operators in D0R commute with each other, and hence algebraic manipulation in the style of classical operational calculus is applicable. The primary purpose of the present paper is to show how the Neumann-series solution of the initial-value problem of the general fDE with constant coefficients is obtained in this way. In particular, it is shown that the Green’s function of general fDE obtained in this way takes the form of the generalized Mittag-Leffler function. In this place, the definition of the Riemann and Liouville (RL) fractional integral and derivative is given and then the calculation is presented to show how the Green’s function of the simplest fDE, which is given by (8) below, is obtained in the form of the two-parameter Mittag-Leffler function, as an illustrative example. In the explanation, we use the notations a Rb :¼ ða; bÞ, a R :¼ ða; 1Þ, Rb :¼ ð1; bÞ and R :¼ ð1; 1Þ for real numbers a and b satisfying a < b, to represent the sets of real numbers. We use the notations Z and N to denote the sets of all integers and all positive integers, respectively. For a 2 Z and b 2 Z satisfying a  b, a Zb and a Z are used for the sets of all integers i satisfying a  i  b and i  a, respectively. Hence N ¼ 1 Z. We use the Heaviside step function Hðt  bÞ for b 2 R, such that the product f ðtÞHðt  bÞ with a function f ðtÞ is assumed to be equal to f ðtÞ for t > b and to 0 for t 5 b. We use dxe for real number x to denote the least integer not less than x. Let f ðtÞ be integrable in the interval ðb; cÞ for a fixed b 2 R and all c 2 b R, so that the product f ðtÞHðt  bÞ is locally integrable in R. Then the RL fractional integral b D R f ðtÞ for  2 0 R, is defined by Z t  1  1 D f ðtÞ ¼ ðt  xÞ f ðxÞ dx Hðt  bÞ; ð1Þ b R ðÞ b and we set b D0R f ðtÞ ¼ f ðtÞHðt  bÞ. For  2 0 R, we put n ¼ de, and then the RL fractional derivative b DR f ðtÞ is defined by 

Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected]

128

MORITA and SATO

 b DR f ðtÞ

 ¼

 dn n D f ðtÞ Hðt  bÞ; b dtn R

ð2Þ

when b DRn f ðtÞ exists and is n times differentiable for t 2 b R. We use 0 DR f ðtÞ in place of 0 D1R f ðtÞ. Here b DR f ðtÞ for  < 0 and  > 0 is defined for t 2 R, but they are usually defined only for t 2 b R, without the factor Hðt  bÞ on the righthand sides of (1) and (2) [4, 8, 12]. For the operator b DR , there exists theR problem that the operators do not commute with each other. For instance, t 1 0 when b ¼ 0 and f ðtÞ ¼ 1, 0 D1 R f ðtÞ ¼ 0 f ðxÞdx HðtÞ ¼ tHðtÞ and 0 DR 0 DR f ðtÞ ¼ HðtÞ ¼ 0 DR f ðtÞ ¼ f ðtÞHðtÞ, while 1 0 0 DR f ðtÞ ¼ 0 and 0 DR 0 DR f ðtÞ ¼ 0 6¼ 0 DR f ðtÞ ¼ f ðtÞHðtÞ. Let f ðtÞHðt  bÞ be locally integrable in R. Then it is a regular distribution in D0R , and its fractional integral  D ½ f ðtÞHðt  bÞ for  2 0 R is given by D ½ f ðtÞHðt  bÞ ¼ b D R f ðtÞ;

ð3Þ

and we set D0 ½ f ðtÞHðt  bÞ ¼ f ðtÞHðt  bÞ. If  2 0 R, n ¼ de, and b Dn R f ðtÞ is n times differentiable in R, then the fractional derivative D ½ f ðtÞHðt  bÞ is given by D ½ f ðtÞHðt  bÞ ¼ b DR f ðtÞ:

ð4Þ

For a right-sided distribution hðtÞ 2 D0R , we use DhðtÞ in place of D1 hðtÞ, and the index law D D hðtÞ ¼ Dþ hðtÞ;

ð5Þ

is always valid for  2 R and  2 R. For instance, D1 HðtÞ ¼ tHðtÞ, DD1 HðtÞ ¼ D0 HðtÞ ¼ HðtÞ, DHðtÞ ¼ ðtÞ is Dirac’s delta function, and D1 DHðtÞ ¼ HðtÞ ¼ D0 HðtÞ. In Appendix A, the definitions of right-sided distributions in D0R and of their fractional integral and derivative are given, and then equalities (3) and (4) and the index law (5) are proved. 1 Let f ðtÞ :¼ ðþ1Þ t for  2 R excluding negative integers, and f ðtÞ :¼ 0 for  2 N. Then, for  2 ð1Þ R and  2 R, we have 8   <  þ 1, > 0 DR f ðtÞ ¼ f ðtÞHðtÞ; > > > < D f ðtÞ ¼ HðtÞ;  ¼ , 0 R  ð6Þ D ½ f ðtÞHðtÞ ¼  > ðtÞ; 0 D f ðtÞ ¼ 0;  ¼  þ 1, > R > > : 1 ðtÞ; 0 DR f ðtÞ ¼ f ðtÞHðtÞ;  =  þ 1. D By putting  ¼  and  ¼ 0 in (6) and then using the fact that D HðtÞ ¼ D1 ðtÞ, we obtain 1 t HðtÞ; ð þ 1Þ

ð7Þ

þ cuðtÞ ¼ f ðtÞ; t > 0;

ð8Þ

D1 ðtÞ ¼ for  2 ð1Þ R. The simplest fDE is given by  0 DR uðtÞ

where  2 0 R and c 2 R satisfy c 6¼ 0. In solving the initial-value problem of this equation, we use the Green’s function GðtÞ, which satisfies ðD þ cÞGðtÞ ¼ ðtÞ;

ð9Þ

1 1 and GðtÞ ¼ 0 for t < 0. This (9) is converted to ð1 þ cD ÞGðtÞ ¼ D ðtÞ ¼ ðÞ t HðtÞ. By (3) and (1), this is regarded as a Volterra integral equation and its Neumann-series solution is given by

GðtÞ ¼

1 1 X X 1 ðcÞn tnþ1  n n D ðtÞ ¼ ðcÞ D ðtÞ ¼ HðtÞ 1 þ cD ðn þ Þ n¼0 n¼0

¼ E0 ð; ; ct Þt1 HðtÞ; by using (7). Here E0 ð; ; xÞ for  2 0 R and  2 0 R, is given by 1 X xn E0 ð; ; xÞ ¼ : ðn þ Þ n¼0

ð10Þ

ð11Þ

This is identical with the two-parameter Mittag-Leffler function E; ðxÞ [1, 4, 12]. As stated above, the primary purpose of the present paper is to show how the Neumann-series solution of the initialvalue problem of the general fDE with constant coefficients is obtained in this way. In section 2, we state the assumption imposed on the RL fractional derivative of a function when it appears in an initial-value problem of a fDE, and its relation with the fractional derivative of a right-sided distribution. Based on it, we convert the general fDE for a function

Neumann-Series Solution of Fractional Differential Equation

129

uðtÞ of t 2 0 R, to the corresponding fDE for a regular distribution uðtÞHðtÞ in D0R , and give the solution, in section 3. The Green’s function, which appears in the solution, is obtained by generalizing the derivation in (10) for the simplest case. As the result, the Green’s function is expressed by a generalized Mittag-Leffler function, in section 4. The solution is compared with the one given in a recent book by Kilbas et al. [4], where the solution is confirmed to satisfy the given equation with the aid of Laplace transform. In section 5, we present the Green’s function for some simple fDE. A brief discussion is given on an fDE in which the solution may take nonzero values in all range of R, in section 6. A concluding remark is presented in section 7. Another typical fractional differentiation is the one due to Caputo. The solution of the general fDE, where the fractional derivatives are Caputo’s, was given by Luchko [5], with the aid of Mikusin´ski’s operational calculus [7]. In Appendix B, it is shown that the same problem is solved by simple alterations of preceding calculations, in the present formalism. The result obtained is confirmed to be the same as that given by Luchko [5]. In Appendix B, a remark is given on the review of Luchko’s work in [4]. Comparisons of the present results with related ones in preceding publications are stated in Remarks 1–4, in sections 4 and 5, and in Appendices A and B. It is well-known that the order of the fractional integral and differentiation may take a complex value [4]. In Appendix C, comment is given what corrections are needed in the arguments in the text, when the order is assumed to take a complex value. In the rest of this section, we give some explanations of terminologies. A function f ðtÞ of real variable t in R is said to be continuous and differentiable, when it is absolutely continuous on R [13, p. 50], so that f ðtÞ is continuous on R, Rc 0 d 0 f ðtÞ ¼ f ðtÞ is locally integrable in R, and f ðcÞ  f ðbÞ ¼ f ðtÞdt if 1 < b < c < 1. A function f ðtÞ is said to be b dt n times differentiable in a Rb , when f ðtÞ itself and its derivatives up to ðn  1Þth order are continuous and differentiable in a Rb . When f ðtÞ is continuous on ðb; cÞ for b 2 R and c 2 b R, f ðbþÞ is used to denote limt!bþ f ðtÞ. A function f ðtÞ is said to have a support bounded on the left, when there exists such a finite b 2 R that f ðtÞ ¼ 0 for t  b. A function gðtÞ is said to have a support bounded on the right, when there exists such a finite c 2 R that gðtÞ ¼ 0 for t  c. In the present paper as well as in [11], a function is simply said to be locally integrable, when it is defined in R and is integrable in the Lebesgue sense over every finite interval in R [13, p. 7].

2. Fractional derivatives in the intial-value problem of fDE 2.1

Riemann-Liouville fractional integral and derivative

Let b 2 R and f ðtÞ be such a function that f ðtÞHðt  bÞ is locally integrable. We then define the Riemann-Liouville    (RL) fractional integral b D R f ðtÞ of f ðtÞ, for  2 0 R, by (1). Now b DR f ðtÞ ¼ b DR ½ f ðtÞHðt  bÞ, b DR f ðtÞ is locally   integrable, and b DR f ðbþÞ ¼ 0 for   1. For  2 0 R, the RL fractional derivative b DR f ðtÞ is defined by (2). Let b DR uðtÞ for b 2 R and  2 0 R be the RL fractional derivative of a function uðtÞ of t 2 R, let u for  2 ð1Þ R be given by u :¼ b DR uðbþÞ

ð12Þ

when it exists, and let N :¼ de. When b DR uðtÞ appears in an initial-value problem of fDE, we assume for every n 2 0 ZN1 that b DnþN uðtÞ is continuous and differentiable at t > b, and there exists a finite value unþN . R Because of this assumption, b DR uðtÞ is locally integrable, and the Taylor series expansion of b DN uðtÞ around t ¼ b R is expressed as N1 X ðt  bÞn N uðtÞ ¼ uNþn Hðt  bÞ þ wðtÞ; ð13Þ b DR n! n¼0 where wðtÞ is a function of oððt  bÞN1 Þ as t ! bþ and satisfies wðtÞ ¼ wðtÞHðt  bÞ and b DR uðtÞ ¼ In the following, when b DR uðtÞ appears for  2 0 R, we adopt this assumption. 2.2

dN dtN

wðtÞ.

Fractional integral and derivative of a regular distribution

In Introduction, the fractional integral and derivative of a regular distribution are given by (3) and (4), but the latter is useful only for a special function. We now give the corresponding formula for the function uðtÞ studied in the preceding subsection. Lemma 1. Let  2 0 R and b DR uðtÞ exist. Then the product uðtÞHðt  bÞ and b DR uðtÞ are regular distributions belonging to D0R , and they are related by de1 X D ½uðtÞHðt  bÞ ¼ b DR uðtÞ þ uk1 Dk ðt  bÞ: ð14Þ k¼0

Proof. The fact that b DR uðtÞ 2 D0R is due to the assumption stated in the preceding subsection. We put N ¼ de, note that DN ½uðtÞHðt  bÞ ¼ b DN uðtÞ due to (3), and apply DN to (13). Then we obtain (14), by using (5) and (7), the R N N N dN equalities D wðtÞ ¼ b DR wðtÞ ¼ dtN wðtÞ due to (4) and b DR uðtÞ ¼ dtd N wðtÞ as noted after (13). 

130

MORITA and SATO

In solving the initial-value problem of fDE, we stressed repeatedly the following lemma [10, 11]. Lemma 2. Let 1 2 R and 2 2 R be two numbers satisfying the conditions that 2 < 1 , the difference 1  2 is not an integer, and b DR1 uðtÞ and b DR2 uðtÞ exist. Then u ¼ 0 for  2 R satisfying   2  1. Proof. We write the expression which is obtained by using (14) for  ¼ 2 and  ¼ 1 , in D2 ½uðtÞHðt  bÞ  D2 1 D1 ½uðtÞHðt  bÞ ¼ 0. Then the condition that the expression is locally integrable results in the conclusion that u2 k1 ¼ 0 for k = 0 and hence for 2  k  1 5 2  1, and u1 k1 ¼ 0 for k = 1  2 and hence for 1  k  1 5 2  1. 

3. Solution of fDE 3.1

Initial-value problem of fDE

We now consider the fDE m 0 DR uðtÞ

þ

m1 X

cl  0 DRl uðtÞ ¼ f ðtÞHðtÞ;

ð15Þ

l¼0

where m 2 N, cl 2 R for l 2 0 Zm1 are constants, l 2 R for l 2 0 Zm and m > 0. Here we assume that f ðtÞHðtÞ is locally integrable, and l < m and cl 6¼ 0 for l 2 0 Zm1 . Usually l > 0 for l 2 1 Zm1 and 0 ¼ 0, but it may happen that l < 0 for some l 2 0 Zm1 . Using Lemma 1 in (15), we obtain ! m1 X m l D þ cl D ½uðtÞHðtÞ ¼ f ðtÞHðtÞ þ vðtÞ; ð16Þ l¼0

vðtÞ :¼

m X

"

dX l e1

cl

# k

ul k1 D ðtÞ ;

ð17Þ

k¼0

l¼0 l >0

where cm ¼ 1. For the initial values ful k1 g, the following lemma follows from Lemma 2. Lemma 3. When the fDE (15) is considered, ul k1 ¼ 0 must hold for every l 2 0 Zm and k 2 0 Z satisfying l  k  1     1, where   is the greater of 0 and the greatest number l which belongs to the set fl gl20 Zm1 and for which m  l is not an integer. Now vðtÞ may be expressed as vðtÞ ¼

2

m X l¼0 l > 

Applying Dm to (16), we obtain 1þ

m1 X

6 4 cl

dX l e1 k¼0 k 

ð22Þ

k¼0 k 0, and on m complex variables fzl gl20 Zm1 , by

¼

n!

Qm1

E ðfl gl20 Zm1 ; m ; fzl gl20 Zm1 Þ Qm1 kl 1 n X X ðn þ Þ! l¼0 zl ¼ : Qm1 Pm1 n¼0 fk0 ;k1 ;;km1 g ! l¼0 kl ! ð l¼0 kl l þ m Þ

ð26Þ

Then GðtÞ given by (25) is expressed as GðtÞ ¼ E0 ðfm  l gl20 Zm1 ; m ; fcl tm l gl20 Zm1 Þ tm 1 HðtÞ: Here we define G ðtÞ for  2 0 Z, by D

and hence G0 ðtÞ ¼ GðtÞ. If we express (28) using the index law (5). It follows that Appendix A.2.

m

m1 X

ð27Þ

!þ1 l

cl D G ðtÞ ¼ ðtÞ; ð28Þ l¼0 by F þ1 G ðtÞ ¼ ðtÞ, we confirm F þ1 D G ðtÞ ¼ D F þ1 G ðtÞ ¼ D ðtÞ by 1 1 D G ðtÞ ¼ D F þ1 ðtÞ ¼ Fþ1 D ðtÞ. The last equality is proved also in þ

Lemma 4. Let  2 0 Z and  2 R satisfying  < ð þ 1Þm , and let G ðtÞ be defined by (28). Then D G ðtÞ is given by

132

MORITA and SATO

D G ðtÞ ¼

ðDm

þ

1 Pm1 l¼0

cl Dl Þþ1

D ðtÞ

¼ E ðfm  l gl20 Zm1 ; ð þ 1Þm  ; fcl tm l gl20 Zm1 Þ  tðþ1Þm 1 HðtÞ:

ð29Þ

Proof. When K is a Volterra integral operator, (24) is valid, which corresponds to the algebraic equality 1 2 expansion ð1  zÞ1 ¼ 1z ¼ 1 þ z þ z þ    for jzj < 1. From this equality, we have the Taylor series P P1 1 ðnþÞ! n 1 n n ¼ n¼0 ðnþÞ! n¼0 n!! z for jzj < 1 and  2 0 Z. Corresponding to this, we have ð1  KÞ n!!  K from (24). Now the second member of (29) is expressed as !n 1 m1 X X 1 ðn þ Þ! m l  D ðtÞ ¼ cl D Dm ðtÞ; P l Þþ1 n!! ð1 þ m1 c D l n¼0 l¼0 l¼0 where l ¼ m  l for l 2 0 Zm1 , and m ¼ ð þ 1Þm  . By applying the calculation as in (25) to this expression and comparing with (26), we obtain (29).  (29) for  ¼ 0 is required when we calculate the solution of (16), with the aid of the formula (22). If the righthand side of (21) is expressed by a sum of partial fractions of the form of the second member in (29), GðtÞ given by (21) is expressed by a sum of generalized Mittag-Leffler functions with less parameters and less variables. Remark 1. In section 5.2.4 of a recent book by Kilbas et al. [4, p. 49], the solution of (15) is given. In that solution, the leading two terms 0 DRm uðtÞ þ cm1  0 DRm1 uðtÞ in (15) are treated separately from the other terms and the Green’s function G0 ðtÞ and the solution of the homogeneous equation Dk G0 ðtÞ in the solution take different forms from those given by (29).

5. Solution of simple fDE 5.1

Two-term fDE

The simplest fDE, which has two terms on the lefthand side, is given by (8), that is  0 DR uðtÞ

þ cuðtÞ ¼ f ðtÞ; t > 0;

ð30Þ

where  2 0 R and c 2 R satisty c 6¼ 0. By (15) and (16), the corresponding equation for uðtÞHðtÞ 2 D0R is as follows: de1 X uk1 Dk ðtÞ: ð31Þ ðD þ cÞ½uðtÞHðtÞ ¼ f ðtÞHðtÞ þ k¼0

We now introduce the Green’s function G ðtÞ for  2 0 Z, by ðD þ cÞþ1 G ðtÞ ¼ ðtÞ:

ð32Þ

The Green’s function GðtÞ for (30) and (31) is defined by (9), that is (32) for  ¼ 0, and G0 ðtÞ is obtained as (10). For  2 R satisfying  <  þ , as a simple case of Lemma 4, we have D G ðtÞ ¼

1 D ðtÞ ¼ E ð;  þ   ; ct Þtþ1 HðtÞ: ðD þ cÞþ1

Here E ð; ; xÞ for  2 0 Z,  2 0 Z and  2 0 Z, is defined by (26), as follows: 1 X ðn þ Þ! xn E ð; ; xÞ ¼ : !n! ðn þ Þ n¼0

ð33Þ

ð34Þ

E ð; ; xÞ for  ¼ 0 is given by (11). The solution of (30) is obtained by using (22) with the aid of this formula (33) for  ¼ 0. The same result is derived in section 4.1.1 in the book [4], by solving the Volterra equation corresponding to (30) by the basic method of iterations. The formula (33) is useful when the partial fractions of the Green’s function is used as stated at the end of section 4. Remark 2. If we take the partial differentiations D G ðtÞ ¼ where E0ðÞ ð; ; xÞ ¼ transform.

d dx

ðD

@ @ðcÞ

D G0 ðtÞ of D G0 ðtÞ given by (33), we obtain

1 1 D ðtÞ ¼ E0ðÞ ð;   ; ct Þtþ1 HðtÞ; þ1 ! þ cÞ

ð35Þ

E0 ð; ; xÞ. In [12, p. 155], this formula for  ¼ 0 is derived with the aid of Laplace

Neumann-Series Solution of Fractional Differential Equation

5.2

133

Three-term fDE

The simple fDE, which has three terms on the lefthand side, is given by  0 DR uðtÞ

þ b  0 DR uðtÞ þ cuðtÞ ¼ f ðtÞ; t > 0;

ð36Þ

where  >  > 0, b 6¼ 0 and c 6¼ 0. The corresponding equation for uðtÞHðtÞ is as follows: ðD þ bD þ cÞ½uðtÞHðtÞ ¼ f ðtÞHðtÞ þ vðtÞ;

ð37Þ

where vðtÞ is given by vðtÞ ¼

de1 X

ðuk1 þ buk1 ÞDk ðtÞ þ

de1 X

uk1 Dk ðtÞ;

ð38Þ

k¼de

k¼0

if    is an integer, and by de1 X

uk1 Dk ðtÞ;

ð39Þ

ðD þ bD þ cÞGðtÞ ¼ ðtÞ:

ð40Þ

vðtÞ ¼

k¼0

if    is not an integer. The Green’s function GðtÞ is now defined by

This is converted to ð1 þ bD þ cD ÞGðtÞ ¼ D ðtÞ ¼ GðtÞ ¼

1 1 þ bD þ cD

1 1 HðtÞ. ðÞ t

D ðtÞ ¼ 

¼ E0 ð;   ; ; ct ; bt Þ t

1 X

The solution of this equation is given by

ðbD  cD Þn D ðtÞ

n¼0 1

HðtÞ:

ð41Þ

Here the three-parameter, two-variable function E ð; ; ; x; yÞ for  2 0 Z,  > 0,  > 0 and  > 0 is defined by 1 X n X ðn þ Þ! xnk yk E ð; ; ; x; yÞ ¼ : ð42Þ !ðn  kÞ!k! ððn  kÞ þ k þ Þ n¼0 k¼0 We now define G ðtÞ for  2 0 Z, by ðD þ bD þ cÞþ1 G ðtÞ ¼ ðtÞ: For  2 R satisfying  <  þ , as a simple case of Lemma 4, we have 1 D ðtÞ D G ðtÞ ¼  ðD þ bD þ cÞþ1 ¼ E ð;   ;  þ   ; ct ; bt Þ tþ1 HðtÞ:

ð43Þ

ð44Þ

This formula for  ¼ 0 is required when we calculate the solution of (36), with the aid of the formula (22). The formula (44) is useful when the partial fractions of the Green’s function is used as stated at the end of section 4.

6. Solution of fDE in R In the preceding sections, we consider functions belonging to D0R , which is the space of right-sided distributions, where a regular function belonging to D0R and a testing function in DR have a support bounded on the left and on the right, respectively. We now consider the space DexiL;bR of testing functions, which are infinitely differentiable, may increase at most exponentially as t tends to 1 and have a support bounded on the right. est HðtÞ for s 2 R is such a function. Then a 2 function, which is locally integrable and decay to 0 faster than any exponential function as t tends to 1, e.g. et , is a regular distribution belonging to the space D0exiL;bR . In the present section, we consider the fDE given by m1 X m cl  1 DRl uðtÞ ¼ f ðtÞ: ð45Þ 1 DR uðtÞ þ l¼0

Here 1 DR uðtÞ for  f ðtÞ 2 D0exiL;bR and the

2 R is defined by (1) and (2) with f ðtÞ and b replaced by uðtÞ and 1, respectively. If solution uðtÞ is assumed to belong to D0exiL;bR , the fDE becomes m1 X Dm uðtÞ þ cl  Dl uðtÞ ¼ f ðtÞ; ð46Þ l¼0

in place of (16). Then the solution of (46) is given by

134

MORITA and SATO

uðtÞ ¼

Dm þ

1 Pm1 l¼0

Z cl Dl

t

Gðt  t0 Þ f ðt0 Þ dt0 ;

f ðtÞ ¼

ð47Þ

1

where GðtÞ is the Green’s function defined by (20) or (21) and its explicit expressions are given for various situations in sections 4 and 5. The fact that there exists  2 R satisfying GðtÞet ! 0 as t ! 1, is guaranteed by a theorem given in the Appendix of [9]. In (47), we have no terms due to the initial values. When GðtÞet ! 0 as t ! 1, we consider the space DexiL;bR of testing functions, in which every function gðtÞ is infinitely differentiable, satisfies gðtÞejtj ! 0 as t ! 1, and has a support bounded on the right. Then a locally integrable function f ðtÞ, which satisfies f ðtÞejtj ! 0 as t ! 1, belongs to D0exiL;bR . Now if f ðtÞ on the righthand side of (46) belongs to D0exiL;bR , the solution of (46) is given by (47).

7. Concluding Remark In the preceding sections, we solve three types of fDE (15), (15C) and (45), which take the form FR uðtÞ ¼ fR ðtÞ, P l where FR ¼ b DRm þ m1 c  l b DR for b ¼ 0 or b ¼ 1 and fR ðtÞ is a locally integrable function. The discussions are l¼0 summarizedPas follows. The fDE FR uðtÞ ¼ fR ðtÞ is first transformed to an equivalent equation FvðtÞ ¼ hðtÞ where l F ¼ Dm þ m1 or vðtÞ ¼ uðtÞ, and hðtÞ is a distribution. When hðtÞ is a regular distribution, l¼0 cl  D , vðtÞ ¼ uðtÞHðtÞ Rt vðtÞ is given by vðtÞ ¼ F 1 hðtÞ ¼ 1 Gðt  t0 Þhðt0 Þdt0 . When hðtÞ is expressed as hðtÞ ¼ DN ðtÞ R t in terms of N 2 N and a locally integrable function ðtÞ, vðtÞ is given by vðtÞ ¼ F 1 hðtÞ ¼ DN F 1 ðtÞ ¼ DN 1 Gðt  t0 Þ ðt0 Þdt0 . The solution uðtÞ is obtained by this. The expressions of GðtÞ ¼ F 1 ðtÞ are obtained in sections 4 and 5.

Appendix A:

The space of right-sided distributions

We consider distributions in the space D0R . A function f ðtÞ which is locally integrable and has a support bounded on the left, belongs to D0R and is called a regular distribution. The distributions in D0R are called right-sided distributions. The testing functions in the space DR which is dual to D0R , are infinitely differentiable and have a support bounded on the right. For hðtÞ 2 D0R , a number hh; gi is associated with every function gðtÞ in DR . For a regular distribution f ðtÞ 2 D0R , the number h f ; gi is calculated by Z1 f ðtÞgðtÞ dt: ðA:1Þ h f ; gi ¼ h f ðtÞ; gðtÞi :¼ 1

An operator FW in the space DR is such that, to every gðtÞ 2 DR , FW gðtÞ 2 DR is associated. Then the operator F in the space D0R , that is conjugate to FW , is defined so that hFh; gi ¼ hh; FW gi

ðA:2Þ

is valid for every hðtÞ 2 D0R and gðtÞ 2 DR . A.1

Fractional integral and derivative of a right-sided distribution

For gðtÞ 2 DR , the fractional integral D W gðtÞ 2 DR is defined by Z1 1  DW gðtÞ :¼ ðx  tÞ1 gðxÞ dx; ðÞ t

ðA:3Þ

for positive  2 R, and we set D0W gðtÞ ¼ gðtÞ. For positive  2 R, the fractional derivative DW gðtÞ 2 DR is given by DW gðtÞ ¼ ð1Þn Dn W

dn gðtÞ; dtn

ðA:4Þ

where n ¼ de. We set DW gðtÞ ¼ D1W gðtÞ ¼  dtd gðtÞ. A proof to show that D W gðtÞ 2 DR is given at the end of this appendix. Lemma 5. Let gðtÞ 2 DR . Then the index law: DW DW gðtÞ ¼ Dþ W gðtÞ;

ðA:5Þ

is valid for every  2 R and every  2 R. R1 Proof. We first note that (A·5) is valid when  < 0 and  < 0, by using (A·3). By (A·3), D1 W gðtÞ ¼ t gðxÞdx, 1   1 and hence DW D1 W gðtÞ ¼ DW DW gðtÞ ¼ gðtÞ. It follows that, for  > 0, DW DW gðtÞ ¼ DW DW DW DW gðtÞ ¼ 1 1   DW DW DW gðtÞ ¼ DW DW DW DW gðtÞ ¼ DW DW gðtÞ. We can now easily complete the proof.  Definition 1. For hðtÞ 2 D0R , the fractional integral and derivative D hðtÞ 2 D0R , for negative and positive  2 R, respectively, are defined by (A·2) with F and FW replaced by D and DW , respectively, where DW gðtÞ for  ¼  < 0 and for  > 0, are given by (A·3) and (A·4).

Neumann-Series Solution of Fractional Differential Equation

135

Definition 1 implies that, when f ðtÞ is continuous and differentiable over R, D f ðtÞ ¼ dtd f ðtÞ. When  > 0 and n ¼ de, D hðtÞ ¼ Dn Dn hðtÞ by (A·4) and Definition 1. The statements in the paragraph including (3) in section 1 are confirmed with the aid of (A·1)–(A·4), Definition 1 and (1). The index law given by (5) follows from Definition 1 and Lemma 5. Remark 3. In the book of Miller and Ross [8, Chapter VII], one chapter is used to discuss the Weyl fractional integral and differentiation, where notation W  gðtÞ is used in place of the present DW gðtÞ. They are defined by (A·3) and (A·4) for function gðtÞ belonging to the class DrdR of functions, which are infinitely differentiable in R and decay more rapidly than power tN for all N 2 N as t tends to 1. Lemma 5 is proved with DR replaced by DrdR . The space DR is a subclass of DrdR . A.2

Inverse operator expressed by the Green’s function

Lemma 6. Let GðtÞ be the Green’s function of an operator F in the space D0R , so that it satisfies FGðtÞ ¼ ðtÞ, GðtÞ ¼ 0 for t < 0, and it is locally integrable. Let FW be the operator in the space DR , that is conjugate to F. Then the 1 operators FW and F 1 , which are inverse to FW and F, respetively, are given by Z1 Z1 1 1 Gðt  xÞgðtÞdt; F f ðtÞ ¼ Gðt  xÞ f ðxÞdx; ðA:6Þ FW gðxÞ ¼ 1

1

D0R ,

and the following relations are valid for  2 R, gðtÞ 2 DR and for gðtÞ 2 DR and a regular distribution f ðtÞ in hðtÞ 2 D0R : 1 1  DW FW gðxÞ ¼ FW DW gðxÞ; F 1 D hðxÞ ¼ D F 1 hðxÞ: ðA:7Þ 1 1 Proof of (A·6). When FW gðxÞ 2 DR and FW FW gðxÞ ¼ gðtÞ are assumed, the equations in (A·6) are consequences of the following equations: 1 1 1 gðxÞ ¼ hðt  xÞ; FW gðtÞi ¼ hFGðt  xÞ; FW gðtÞi ¼ hGðt  xÞ; gðtÞi FW Z1 ¼ Gðt  xÞgðtÞdt;

ðA:8Þ

1

Z 1  Z1 1 hF 1 f ðtÞ; gðtÞi ¼ h f ðxÞ; FW gðxÞi ¼ f ðxÞ Gðt  xÞgðtÞdt dx 1 Z 1  1 Gðt  xÞ f ðxÞdx; gðtÞ : ¼

ðA:9Þ

1

In the last equality, Fubini’s theorem is used.



1 Proof of (A·7), and proof to show that FW gðtÞ 2 DR . When gðtÞ 2 DR , gðtÞ has a support bounded on the right, so that 1 there exists c 2 R such that gðtÞ ¼ 0 for all t > c. Then we confirm that FW gðtÞ ¼ 0 for all t > c by using (A·6) and the fact that GðtÞ ¼ 0 for t < 0. By using the fact that two convolutions of fuctions HðtÞ and GðtÞ, which have a support bounded on the left, commute with each other [14, p. 125], we conclude (A·7) for  < 0. We now confirm (A·7) 1 1 1 1 1 for  ¼ 1 as DW FW gðtÞ ¼ DW FW DW DW gðtÞ ¼ DW D1 W FW DW gðtÞ ¼ FW DW gðtÞ. We can now easily complete the 1 1 1 proofs, since DW FW gðtÞ ¼ FW DW gðtÞ implies that FW gðtÞ is infinitely differentiable.  1  For  > 0, D W is a special one of FW , and hence we obtain DW gðtÞ 2 DR .

Appendix B:

Use of the Caputo fractional derivative

We now consider the Caputo fractional derivative b DC f ðtÞ for b 2 R and positive . It is defined by  n   n d f ðtÞ ; b DC f ðtÞ ¼ b DR dtn

ðB:1Þ

when f ðtÞ is n times differentiable for t > b, where n ¼ de. We express the equation in which 0 DCl uðtÞ appears in place of 0 DRl uðtÞ for l 2 0 Zm in (15), by (15C). In place of (14), we have the relation de1 X D ½uðtÞHðtÞ ¼ 0 DC uðtÞ þ uk Dk1 ðtÞ: ðB:2Þ k¼0

Using this in (15C), we obtain (16) with vðtÞ given by

136

MORITA and SATO

vðtÞ :¼

m X

"

l¼0 l >0

cl

dX l e1

# uk Dl k1 ðtÞ ;

ðB:3Þ

k¼0

where cm ¼ 1. Now the solution of (16) is given by " # Zt dX m l e1 X Gðt  t0 Þ f ðt0 Þ dt0 þ cl uk Dl k1 GðtÞ : uðtÞHðtÞ ¼ 0

ðB:4Þ

k¼0

l¼0 l >0

GðtÞ and Dl k1 GðtÞ are expressed in terms of the generalized Mittag-Leffler function, by using the formula (29) for  ¼ 0 and  2 R: D GðtÞ ¼ D G0 ðtÞ ¼ tm 1 E0 ðfl g; m  ; fzl gÞ; where fl g and fzl g represent fm  l gl20 Zm1 and fcl tm l gl20 Zm1 , respectively. We now rewrite (B·4) as Zt dX m e1 uðtÞHðtÞ ¼ Gðt  t0 Þ f ðt0 Þ dt0 þ uk yk ðtÞHðtÞ; 0

ðB:5Þ

ðB:6Þ

k¼0

where yk ðtÞ ¼ tk E0 ðfl g; k þ 1; fzl gÞ þ

m1 X

cl0 tm l

0

þk

E0 ðfl g; l0 þ k þ 1; fzl gÞ:

ðB:7Þ

l0 ¼0 dl0 ekþ1

We can show that yk ðtÞ is expressed also as yk ðtÞ ¼

m1 X tk ðcl0 Þtm l þk E0 ðfl g; k þ 1 þ l0 ; fzl gÞ: þ k! l0 ¼0 0

ðB:8Þ

dl0 ek

Derivation of (B·8). We note here the formula: E0 ðfl g; ; fzl gÞ ¼

m1 X 1 þ zl E0 ðfl g;  þ l0 ; fzl gÞ; ðÞ l0 ¼0 0

ðB:9Þ

which is derived by observing the following formula: 1 X m1 m1 X X 1 þ  f ðl1 ;    ; ln Þ; ðB:10Þ E0 ðfl g; ; fzl gÞ ¼ ðÞ n¼1 l1 ¼0 ln ¼0 Q P where f ðl1 ;    ; ln Þ ¼ nk¼1 zlk =ð nk¼1 lk þ Þ. By using (B·9) in the first term on the righthand side of (B·7), we obtain (B·8).  The second term on the righthand side of (B·8) consists of terms of the form constant  t with  > m , and hence k we can easily confirm the initial condition that limt!0þ dtd k uðtÞ ¼ uk for k 2 0 Zdm e1 , for the solution given by (B·6) combined with (B·8).   Here we consider the two-term fDE. We express the equation in which 0 DP C uðtÞ appears in place of 0 DR uðtÞ in (30), de1 k1 by (30C). By using (B·2) in (30C), we obtain (16) with vðtÞ given by vðtÞ :¼ k¼0 uk D ðtÞ. Now the solution of (30C) is given by Zt de1 X uðtÞHðtÞ ¼ Gðt  t0 Þ f ðt0 Þ dt0 þ uk Dk1 GðtÞ; ðB:11Þ 0  1

GðtÞ ¼ E0 ð; ; ct Þt

k¼0

HðtÞ; Dk1 GðtÞ ¼ E0 ð; k þ 1; ct Þtk HðtÞ:

This is the special case of (B·4) or (B·6), for m ¼ 1, 1 ¼ , 0 ¼ 0, and c0 ¼ c. The functions yk ðtÞ in (B·6) are given by (B·7) without the second term on the righthand side, and by (B·8) with the second term on the righthand side for l0 ¼ 0. Remark 4. Luchko [5] derived the solutions of (15C) and (30C), with the aid of Mikusin´ski’s operational calculus. The solution (B·11) of (30C) agrees with his equation given on the top of p. 481 in [5]. The solution of (15C) given in Theorem 3.1 in [5] agrees with (B·6) combined with (B·8). Theorem 3.1 in [5] is reviewed in section 4.3.4 in the book [4], but we note some confusion in the indices of fractional differentiations in the review.

Neumann-Series Solution of Fractional Differential Equation

Appendix C:

137

fDE of complex order

In the text, we assume that the orders  and  of fractional integral and differentiation D hðtÞ and D hðtÞ are real numbers. In the book [4], complex values are assumed for these values. If we assumed that the orders , , , l and m , and the coefficients cl , c and b in fDE in the text take complex values, the statements there would be valid, providing that the following corrections were introduced. 1. When the indices , , , l and m appear in an inequality, they must be replaced by their real values; e.g.,  > 0 by Re  > 0. 2. When z is a complex number, dze must be replaced by dRe ze, except when Re z is an integer and z 6¼ Re z. In the latter case, dze must be replaced by Re z þ 1 ¼ dRe z þ e, where is an infinitesimal positive number. 3. In Lemma 4, the set fl gl20 Zm1 must be replaced by fRe l gl20 Zm1 .

Acknowledgements The authors are grateful to Prof. Hiroaki Hara, for calling their attention to the paper [6] and the book [4]. REFERENCES [1] Erde´lyi, A., Magnus, W., Oberhettinger, F., and Tricomi, F. G., Higher Transcendental Functions, Vol. III, McGraw-Hill, New York (1955). [2] Fukunaga, M., ‘‘An Operational Method for Ordinary Differential Equations Based on Integration,’’ Int. J. Appl. Math., 20: 29–49 (2007). [3] Fukunaga, M., and Shimizu, N., ‘‘Analytical and Numerical Solutions for Fractional Viscoelastic Equations,’’ JSME Int. J., Series C, 47: 251–259 (2004). [4] Kilbas, A. A., Srivastava, H. M., and Trujillo, J. J., Theory and Applications of Fractional Differential Equations, Elsevier, Amsterdam (2006). [5] Luchko, Yu., ‘‘Operational Method in Fractional Calculus,’’ Frac. Calc. Appl. Anal., 2: 463–488 (1999). [6] Luchko, Yu. F., and Srivastava, H. M., ‘‘The Exact Solution of Certain Differential Equations of Fractional Order by Using Operational Calculus,’’ Computers Math. Applic., 29: 73–85 (1995). [7] Mikusin´ski, J., Operational Calculus, Pergamon Press, London (1959). [8] Miller, K. S., and Ross, B., An Introduction to the Fractional Calculus and Fractional Differential Equations, John Wiley, New York (1993). [9] Morita, T., ‘‘Solution of the Initial-Value Problem of a Fractional Differential Equation,’’ in Similarity in Diversity, Eds. S. Fujita, H. Hara, D. Morabito and Y. Okamura, Nova Science Publishers, Inc., New York, pp. 245–257 (2003). [10] Morita, T., ‘‘Solution of the Initial-Value Problem of a Fractional Differential Equation,’’ Int. J. Appl. Math., 15: 299–313 (2004). [11] Morita, T., and Sato, K., ‘‘Solution of Fractional Differential Equation in Terms of Distribution Theory,’’ Interdisc. Inf. Sc., 12: 71–83 (2006). [12] Podlubny, I., Fractional Differential Equations, Academic Press, San Diego (1999). [13] Riesz, F., and Sz.-Nagy, B., Functional Analysis, Dover Publications, Inc., New York (1990). [14] Zemanian, A. H., Distribution Theory and Transform Analysis, (Dover Publications, Inc., New York, 1987). [15] Zhang, W., and Shimizu, N., ‘‘Numerical Algorithm for Dynamical Problems Involving Fractional Operators,’’ JSME Int. J., Series C, 41: 364–370 (1998).