Meeting Abstracts
Development of a multicentre randomised controlled trial of screening and brief alcohol intervention to prevent risky drinking in young people in a high-school setting (SIPS JR-HIGH) Emma Louise Giles, Stephanie Scott, Simon Coulton, Paolo Deluca, Colin Drummond, Erin Graybill, Denise Howel, Eileen Kaner, Elaine McColl, Ruth McGovern, Elaine Stamp, Harry Sumnall, Les Tate, Liz Todd, Dorothy Newbury-Birch
Abstract Background Young people are vulnerable to the effects of alcohol consumption. Adverse effects from alcohol manifest in a range of short-term and long-term physical and psychosocial factors, including neurological issues, cognitive impairment, and risk-taking behaviours. The aim of the SIPS JR-HIGH, a multicentre randomised controlled trial (RCT), is to assess the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of alcohol screening and brief intervention to reduce risky drinking in young people aged 14–15 years in the English high-school setting. Methods Building on a mixed-method cluster-randomised controlled pilot feasibility trial (Current Controlled Trials, ISRCTN07073105), the proposed sample for the definitive trial, to be conducted from September, 2015, to December, 2017, has been calculated to have 90% power and will follow up 257 young people in each arm at 12-month follow-up (ISRCTN45691494). 20 schools will be recruited (in September, 2015), five of which will be from North East England, North West England, London, and Kent. The RCT will incorporate a control arm of usual school-based practice on alcohol issues and an intervention arm that combines usual care with a 30 min brief intervention delivered by school learning mentors. Individual pupils will be randomised to one of the two arms. The primary outcome will be total alcohol consumed in the past 28 days judged by the 28 day Time Line Follow Back method. Descriptive statistical analysis will be used to report the pupil-level baseline data, with multiple linear regressions being used to compare the primary outcomes between the two arms at 12 months. Findings The pilot trial guided the development of the manualised intervention, which includes process information and a 30 min personalised interactive worksheet-based session delivered by learning mentors. The pilot suggested that this intervention was acceptable, but an intervention with parental involvement was not found to be feasible, with parents not engaging with the research. Interpretation Little evidence exists in a UK context to explore screening and brief intervention to reduce risky drinking in young adolescents. The pilot trial has informed the design of the upcoming definitive trial which, if the intervention is effective, will facilitate the development of manualised screening and brief intervention to be adopted in routine school practice in high schools in England. Funding This project is funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Public Health Research (PHR) programme (project number 13/117/02). Contributors All authors contributed to the design and development of this feasibility pilot trial. ELG and DN-B drafted the abstract. All authors read and approved the abstract. Declaration of interests We declare no competing interests.
Published Online November 13, 2015 Health and Social Care Institute, Teesside University, Middlesbrough, UK (E L Giles PHD, Prof D Newbury-Birch PhD); Institute of Health and Society, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK (S Scott PhD, D Howel MSc, E Graybill MSc, Prof E Kaner PhD, Prof E McColl PhD, R McGovern PhD, E Stamp MMATHSTAT); Centre for Health Service Studies, University of Kent, Canterbury, UK (Prof S Coulton MSc); Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, Kings College London, London, UK (P Deluca PhD, Prof C Drummond PhD); Centre for Public Health, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, UK (Prof H Sumnall PhD); North Tyneside Council, North Tyneside, UK (L Tate MSc); and School of Education, Communication and Language Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK (Prof L Todd, PhD) Correspondence to: Dr Emma L Giles, 1.21 Constantine Building, Teesside University, Middlesbrough TS1 3BA, UK
[email protected]
Acknowledgments The views and opinions expressed in this abstract are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the PHR programme, NIHR, National Health Service, or Department of Health.
www.thelancet.com
37
