Quantum Theory & Sets
2
Quantum Theory & Sets Alexander P.M. Van den Bosch (PhD)
4
Index of Books The Super Station So Far no Good Rain Weaver The Dark Window The Real Deal QFST Strangeness in QFT Quantum State Theory The Quantum Space Realigned The river runs dry The Sandman Game The Show The Thing So Long & Thanks for all the Fish Going Outside 5
6
Introduction
I have this idea, a few actually, In just a few months I worked out in my mind in these 16 books a new foundation for Quantum stuff in general. I am an analytical philosopher, not a mathematician but it turned out the way it did, a translation of even GFT to a set theoretic basis that makes perusal and change and computation in simulation a hoot. In enjoyed this endeavor tremendously and work with the spin-off co. Nell for med. applications. And further work on how other Q. concepts like 'story' can be fit in, I am doing that at the moment. A lifted arm in q.mech is a completed story. How to fit that in, I already have a FIRM idea, also for other applications for the story concept in Industry (Movie/TV). To versatility! Alexander P.M. van den Bosch
7
8
these 16 books on the philosophy of Quantum Mechanics are dedicated to those who dare to invest and guess and figure out for them selves all the way
9
10
Summary I have a ball. That ball has seventeen thousand sides. On what side will I lay it down. That question is NOT amply addressed in QM or FT at the moment. What I learned from studying TM's in the work of Vitany, a TM is one string of decisions, over time and in QM over pos. worlds. You make consc. Decisions, so your consciousness takes lead in every action in some way overriding or collapsing, it collapses the wave of and on all your decisions. So what is your consc. In THAT view? Well... a infinite stochastic string, a string, a wave tuple, that collapses other wavlets. So two waves, consciousness wave, biiiiig, and the 17K side ball. The consc. String decides/collapses the tuple var of the NEXT state of that ball. So. In this whole book: Consciousness is an infinite string crossing borders and is stochastic That string is, can be repr. by a wavelet/a collapser of sorts That is simple math. If var a of the ball is nill, and a of cons. Is side 34.. the state of the ball is going to be 34, bar the ground and moist. Nothing new? I DO think so. Consi. Is a collapser we KNOW that from Schrödinger, HOW is a mystery, but consc is a TM, basically that is SO 80's philosophy of science. Has that been put in QM? Please prove. Next in this book alone: Consc. Alone, and first will provide new predictions also in the q.sim rooms of Cray and others. See the many examples provided. Last, but all the least: Put all in a var. set and a constraint set, add GFT... DANCE !!! 11
12
The Super Station
13
14
Table of Contents The river that runs outside The callous way to real thinking So now we are in that station So to think I am in need of some tetra-hexagons Store that for me, will you I have still this inkling of a doubt about all that Now we are here, where is the real deal No That is the last remark That is stiffening I am now a stiff looking corpse of a computer There is no real space, you hear me To retrieve all that from memory is data-losing Come on, stay here with this real problem That is uncalled for The Super Station 15
16
The river that runs outside I have this naggin idea, multiple actually, that, while... Oh.
There goes ..
Everything is away now. That's a bummer..!!
And I wanted that this introduction would last.. ! (the beginning) !! ?? 17
18
The callous way to real thinking I like to think, I like to think real, that is, real stuff, meaning, about reality, and whatnot... NOOOO I like to think. (period) What is all this thinking I grew up in a school of mostly formal mathematically oriented logic I discovered neural networks later on, first the physics, than the rules.. Later, still, even the whole real biochemistry in extreme .. That all ended up in my Rationality in Discovery (my all-ball book on..) So.. what is th.. I read Permutation City... my brain almost died. I had a course on relativity theory (Einstein) the fields, crystal dim. I looked around in more than 25 books on quantum mechanics, all just.. That was when I was in college, that Greg Egan guy, he.. Scott Adams.? Oh.. Scott does more than draw, he writes all those short and... on.. !!!! So, what ended up in my brain still after 35 years of thinking deeper??? 19
20
So now we are in that station We are in a City Uhm, the rest in my wow The 300 Reasons on thinking with a.. go read We are still in a city Many roads go in and out. What does that mean... every City... In Permutation City the whole... Oooooh (grunt) that whole Greg Egan master piece is (also) on Q.M. And on quantum states, and possible worlds, and quantum fluctuation and on Schrödinger, and aaaaaargh, it blew me away, but only recently.. Here we go. Have you read Perm. City? Please... read all the following.. And after that, do not read P.C. Right away again, let my 'other' interpretation 'sink' in, the real physical brain really needs time to .. !!! If you throw away another idea with an old idea, that is going to cost y. Yes, I am also a very professional trainer, and in Philosophy of Science, also in Kuhn and Paul Thagards work... it is clear. New ideas … PAIN!! So why the warning(s)? If you let it sink in for a whole week? Re-reading your old copy of Perm. City is as if, yes, again, another different look on that City.. Oh 21
22
So to think I am in need of some tetra-hexagons There it is, you walk the clouds, in your mind that is.. Where is the exit
In Perm. City, you walk the any road to oblivion, but... no end !?!?!?!?! Yes. Any road in Permutation City, leads back to... hell (the 'City'). What is the Quantum meaning of all that? Why not just.. wait If the town, I mean, .. The city is a mental construct. A 'thing'. No it's not, says my girl, she reads this when I type... it is .. WHA .. !?!? The City, it is, not you, like Egan insinuates, or,.. the book made me think that when I was 24/25, but.. The City that is a connection-point to all those lanes with things to experience, Quantum State lanes, that you can jump...bu.. how?? THE CITY IS YOUR OWN WHOLESOME CONSCIOUSNESS ! ! ! ! (why) (why this part) (ah) (love) 23
24
Store that for me, will you I now get a clearer picture.. If that wholesome City is your (quantum decider) of a consciousness.. So. There is that thing. Consciousness. Ah..!!
That cons. that is what observes the quantum possibilities.. !! (why that continuous use of 'quantum', use, please, uhm, nothing, aagh) NOOOOOOOO The quantum aspect of it all is .. ?? That the city determines on what lane you walk/drive/experience.. More on
Wait a whole damn minute. Buildings are not consciousness. Stop it! Ah, to much information. That is what my girl said when I tried.. (stop) 25
26
I have still this inkling of a doubt about all that Ah doubt. Now, use your thinking cap. You are in this boat, just visualize.. (get it?) Now, the boat goes... say North-North-East. Now that is your lane.. sort of. You are in that boat, but 'in' you is uhmmm, your consciousness??? (no) Your whole body is experienced by you. So.. ????? You can also say.. I wrote about this point earlier in 2015 in.. (later) !?!? This is radical but it all makes sense, and, the formulas of all physics and psychology and geology and all science stay put... You need to picture it in your head. There is where the 'point' is seen.. Say. Say that your consciousness is 'just' this phenomenon. And within.. (oh no do not run away, it also,.. no the view is a radical reversal in .. please picture) 27
28
Now we are here, where is the real deal You are walking the streets of your own town, now, yes another take, same, ok, I go on.. You walk across this road.
Try imagining that the road actually .. I mean, you seem to stand still, your legs move along the road, but your whole being can also... You stand still. The roads move. Take a camera, that is consciousness. The camera is moved around, seemingly by the two-pod of your legs on your wholesome body.. But, without any change... You can also say the world moves, the camera stays still. The legs move, but, hey the road 'seems'.... Ok, this worked with me. I am working toward the real sound vision that consciousness is just that what experiences a whole crap load of stuff.. It is philosophy, but if you go to Quantum stuff also/even the very technical parts, that makes more sense, than... (ok, next try) 29
30
No Ah, that is your one-bit answer?
To what, have you tried..?? Uhm, ah you think, consciousness is in the world as one of the phenomena in that world, while in that other view (point) the view is from consciousness and it seems that the world is inside whole of your consciousness !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Is that.. Oh forget that, it works... do the math. I mean, the math on the Quantum Fluctuation frameworks that exist. It is (again) such a simple idea, but, .. I walk a street, you walk a street. We meet (up) Do our consciousnesses meet up? Do they almost touch? No? Yes? Yes, this is 'The Matrix' thinking... (I do NOT think so.. it is BIGGER) (we think we meet, we just see..) !! 31
32
That is the last remark That is the whole point. Nothing more nothing less. I thought off it, all my study on physical Quantum stuff made (more) sense. It..
Practical consequence? None that I know off, but..
In religions (he is not going that way again is he, mr. E. California) NO, hear me out.
In almost all religion? If someone dies? Tunnel of light, whatnot? Oh, or your whole consciousness starts to experience other stuff..
Leaving earth means, in this view, experiencing leaving your body and earth, but the practical side is... where is your consciousness seated? In your head? Your head (also) an experience of consciousness? Both views? Again... just VIEW POINTS That is a valid remark. Try it for size. The real practical part? Understanding A L O T more about certain.. !!? 33
34
That is stiffening Ah, I found a way to look at it, so where are (now) all the consciousnesses? In the sky, and they share Earth with a body avatar, with other consciousnesses that are experiencing Earth? And the rest is just in 'heaven'? Wait, is that the place all consciousnesses are, not also, but is where they are. And, oh, Matrix again, they 'do' the earth experience. Oh, that is religious, certainly spiritual. How do I know for sure. Only after or just before I 'look like' to die? That is consoling.. but.
That is just one way to look at all the all. I.. Again. You are in this canoe/city/car/..body.. You just see people and airplanes and flies, just.. In the quantum state theories amazing 'stuff' happens that in the lab.. oh
No, I am sick of this, my head starts to really hurt, I now go into a (coma)
That is the consequence for thinking to deep ideas without that lifejacket. (pah) (get one) 35
36
I am now a stiff looking corpse of a computer Ah, that is one thing. If you really take this 'other' 'reversed' idea in..
It now seems so that It happened to me when I started thinking it, it is weird, but it goes away, but I have it again now I am making a book on it, just.. stay... up
Your body, is a physical thing, a living physical, biological wow ...uhm. If you take the perspective of consciousness first, really it is so much more than 'philosophy' or 'view-pointing', like...(B. Margolis lecture) Ok. Another … no lets work this through. With a list. Watch carefully. Lists are strong, but I do not want to convince you, but to let you experience.. something … another experience of the same world. I know, it seems weird, it makes you stronger in the end. New … I mean another view taken in NEXT to others, makes you, variable.. !!! 37
38
There is no real space, you hear me This is nice: If this view is 'true', what about... Try it first, decide on truth yourself I get that but omg that is off course.. here is my argument. So? Thanks I have left that all on, oh, I did not read all so, now I am excused? Yes So. Uhm.. nice view and all. But. Hahaaaaa. I got you. Fine. There is a room in that movie 'What the BLEEP' do y.. YES, read this So I still do not get this book but, nice cover, are fractals also... YES!! Why all that with lines and all, that is not conform the style of.. OH! You are being either coy or defensive. Which? Please read the book !! This list of you, I want to argue th... GO AWAY. Try the view or leave Reading is always nice but you talk like.. do you know what about? !! I assume that like in your fine The 300 Reasons you. READ THIS FI I have a real head-ache now. Is that because I read Egan right away? ! Super and all, but............. Why is … why all the arguments..! Get me a sinaspril, or.. wait I am getting tired of this. Bye. Read!!
There is no real space, quantum mechanics will let you understand that. That vision can be held with the math, but.. not this book.
NEXT 39
40
To retrieve all that from memory is data-losing I have this dog, yes, she has a collar. What does that mean?
Sometimes all those technical rebuttals are just that... trying to rebut, bu
41
42
Come on, stay here with this real problem Do you know what a real problem is? That is a situation. A situation is a state collection. A real problem is a state collection that cannot be collapsed so and so.. Collapsing a state is done by rules of grammar Huh. I mean, a rule of grammar is a q.position determination set. Oh,.. wha..? It means, that set determines if a set of states is a real 'problem' Ah (?) If the grammar set, really a set of wholesome rules, lets loose that so and so is ALLOWED, no not possible that is different.. The brain/consciousness collapses the problem state to a possible.. NOOO an allowed state, that is not considered as 'real problem'. So? What do we have for breakfast? 43
44
That is uncalled for Ah, so I introduced that notion of grammar set for q.states and you do not understand, so now I am... off course? Can you tell? Are you familiar with it all such that? I started my tour of duty with From Quantum to Quark, a Dutch course, I read a whole lot of Richard Feynman. Yes, Wuli Masters from..
I do not want or need to be apologetic, just..
Try the view or read... other views on maybe simpler stuff.
Yes that is harsh. Q.M. broke my axons for three years, but they grow back, and getting really into, really really into something that does not hold your fancy but looks important or/and is incredibly difficult... that hurts your brain a lot. And after the real disappearance of that hurt, there is really a real change in your physical brain, different connections, longer axons in some places, and get this, in pain, there are these peptides, yes I learned that in my PhD training in the neuroscience classes. But my endeavor in neuropharmacoly learned me this: I am in pain. The brain responds. What happens? New things. What new things? New (TYPES of) growth 45
46
The Super Station I am at this station. I look around, is this a 'Harry Potter' kind of super train station??? Oh, I see Marie, walking... get that on the rails, with oh a kind of machi I here a screech That is not a nice sound.... !! I look around still Oh, another, what is that, a 'worm'? Where AM I? I am at the super station, the place of unlimited possibilities. Oh, is this heaven, a kid asks me beside me, suddenly.. wow. !?!?!?!?!!! So I start walking. That is the door to... huh a door? OMG, oh please! We are now in that bed room, where he, that other guy..quick GET HIM This is dystopian. Am I dead or mad. I am both, I think... Oh I get back, Marie is still there, with the guy from the bed room !!!! Ah!! What to make of all of this? Well, for starters, this world...: IT IS NOW NOT YOUR SERVER !!!! 47
48
So Far no Good
49
50
Table of Contents There is just so much to do My wish is that I do this all the time There is no good way Stay that tropure The savest way is meaning The rear end is no good There is that save house So for all that we know The rest can be in that way Please stay Off to that boat house There is no way I can sail Please I can not be that person again Save that Store this in my garden The nearest way to paradise is stu Is that really you my sister The now state in QST To now we have that paradise again So close
51
52
There is just so much to do I have this dream. That dream is this. I go out. I ride this boat-ride-water-thing. There is such a way to that that we are now in that state. There is this way of the nuisance. I have that in my pocket. Those objects are now mine. Be that guest in there. The next is just the best. To be on that tuple. Rest assured. I need that weapon (oh) Teressa is now in that very clear think tank. The rest is just that way. The main way to safety is guild. The interesting way. (if you where wondering, these are all quant. state tuples, going in sets) 53
54
My wish is that I do this all the time Oh. There is this way. To the next part. To that part I …. O M G a G O A T in the f. R O O M ! ! ! ! ! People. I decided to start that new field QST, and work my burning ass off in getting it up to par, with QED, FT, QM and QFT.. and.. well. So. First of all. Quant. states are VERY fluctuating. One wavelet that is .. Meaning, I can observe that white screen (q. experiments) and think of those listed intentions. And let my observations 'collapse' that intention in my 'vision' on that white board. That WORKS people. That is in the work for more than 35 years in the U.S. and Russia, and China. But almost nowhere else, except Switzerland (privat). You look at that white board, you call out that intention/phrase/situation, and you keep on looking in trance, waiting for that 'vision'. So. What happens in the books The Show, The Sandman, Rain Weaver and The Real Deal (my former exposition books of details about QST). All these scripted images that 'appear', from 'the mind'... sometimes scare the HELL out of psychological test subjects. What happens? Intent a nice... OMG a GOAT! and.. WHA.. WHAT!!!! Sometimes a very nice face of that or who, just... talking! Or... guns, and real stupid behavior of.. MY GOD!!! Some are traumatized. Now... FT actually predicts.. PREDICTS those aberrations... PER wavelet..!! (that is sooooo... uhm, is this true? Who knows this. People: NDA's.. !!) 55
56
There is no good way I have this situation. This is now that good thing. Oh, did we have that really here? See, get that.. We are in that house Go on my son of mine, but.. shave What the F...!! That tuple, that wavelet, that is a complete UNIVERSE, Mars and all..!! How... how can that one intention “Go on.. .. shave” be such a big string??? Well. That is because the rest of the parameters of FT, are well... that. I looked and thought first principle style. QST has a different set of par. 57
58
Stay that tropure So. Here goes. The QST tuple/wavelet/state engine/being thing/motor.. We need a Cray super computer, preferably second hand (matters) We run a simulation program, say Dream Weaver? That nice program takes in a tuple, a wavelet, that as part of a sim engine to visualize nice universa. In that book The Show, p. 29 and 33, there are TWO vis. Tuples/wavelets, that, when given to Dream Weaver, simulate in almost perfection, in tup. 1 the known Universe (nice) but.. in tup. 2 a nice imagineering of what heaven on earth looks like (flying and floating water). Ah... why do y.. do any of us want to see floating water..? And.. People, a Cray Super Computer, and that sim software, and... That tuple, that is an input to a collapser. Meaning, a 'Theory' about that The formulas from QST are 15 intersection functions that take IN that wavelet/tuple, and generate/produce/COLLAPSE that wavelet to a state. But in FT that state is just THAT, a singular state. In QST it can/will be a Transfer, or a Goat, or THAT WHAT WE SEE. In meme talk. The memes form the former pages are wavelet tuples, describing/collapsing that whole universe to that singular state. QST does also do Transfer and Stearing, and Believe and Growth. That last one is in NONE of the existing QM interpretations... not in FT, not in Flux T. not in QM. So. That tuple/wavelet, lets call them wavelets because that tuple is a WAVE, and.. more later. That wavelet.. with the shave.. in QST? (omg) 59
60
The savest way is meaning Now, for the real business. I am going to be in this q.state.. OK!! These are 7 of the 15 core formulas of QST, the quantum st. collapser. 1. There is just one man on this street 2. The way to Tarzan is to not go outside 3. To that mobile sun of mine 4. There is no straight way 5. There is but one person 6. There is also this woman 7. There is no violence Why all the meme's? In QST they are the parameters. Take any wavelet/meme, and collapse, but take that same ONE meme, like “There is man on a horse” in QST, and when collapsing just that one meme/wavelet, also take the at least 7 memes/wavelets from above, in Dream Weaver, a computer program that computes the q.state of these eight wavelets... The result, a wave, a total state that... implies QED. Meaning, all constraints from Quantum Electro Dynamics are fully met under the rest of the total core of QST rules/constraints/formula (yet, secret !!) Ah... That is a nice forward claim. Is that also proved in Mathematica? No. By pen and paper, constraint by constraint. (more in progress) 61
62
The rear end is no good So. What kind way to solve a problem... state. No. I have seen this vision. I looked at those white boards privately. I tuned my intentions to the scale of all from FT and beyond. I almost.. I saw that horse. On a white plane, grazing a plane in green. No mr. scary. That is NOT possible with the aid of the FT memes that need to be intended before hand. That is the way that FT predicts / explains what and how what images appear, some moving, not all, still.. There is more. Now I have seen that horse. (please try dear FT people) There is this man. There is that woman. (also in QST) Now, they have that house. (seems harmless, don't it..no, it is not !!) (people, that read this at home, please do not try QS exp. at home.. !!) So....... the last one. I have now seen that garden. The wedge is now on my rever. See that lake. (now, close your eyes, and intent YOUR meme and look) 63
64
There is that save house I have now this way in my bed. I get there on the same time. There is this way to heaven. To the shard I have been on. Get that in gear. I hear that now. Be that friend will you. You are now in this bible club (oh.. that is a MEME, but.. you see, look) There is now that strange sound. Be that in your beauty. See that we are in this room. To the left. The neediest. Oh I died again. Not. (really, REALLY, please add 'Not'..no not funny) See there is that goat. There is this miauw. 65
66
So for all that we know See. I have got. Need to wish that. There is this room. The neediest. Read the tempest. Here. I see that happening. There is now this goat. I see the goat. (now it goes well, see... look around) There is now this house. There is that new apparatus. There is now also a near man. See that in the mirror. Get it in the room. Stay out of the fire. (people, QF.. people..PLEASE use this one !!!!!!)
67
68
The rest can be in that way Ok. I get the best of you. The rest of me goes into blindness (harmless, really) There is that room on fire (!!) I am not in that room. I stand on the roof. (!!!!!) There is that way to the dungeon. (yes... YES... finally!!!) There is that underground manour (yuck, really) See that we get the sun? There is that stately measure..!! (exclimate in your intent, HARD) So, that measure. Oh WOW. (no NOT think of World of Warcr. !!!!) I get the dearest way. Be there or be square. There is now a very real sense of dread. (Oh oh oh oh... PAIN, REAL) Now we are near that palace. (go go go go .. FAST) I have been there now. See. Look! (really, look, look around, truly, minutely, pricely, omnious)
69
70
Please stay I have now this idea. To the rash I have. I need that on my stay. Be that as it may. There is this baby. I need that in full gear. Go out and be the best. There is this kind resize. The stables, I see braid. I get that on my own. I get that in my shaft. Stay in this will you be. The raciest thing is now I get. To there is that being. (scary, alien, or whatnot...) See there is this truth. (think NOT, let it happen... easy easy.. GO) This is the fame
71
72
Off to that boat house I need that song. I get that song. That song will show me the meaning for real. Truth please I see Lady GaGa as a person Berrility Give up... now you monsters.... you to Drake (dismissive) Go out all you swine-ries I want a huffstead on my grill Menage-a-deux, my style for staying I trust no butler ever again that plays... Dancefloor GET UP (shouted) Bereft me noooooooooooooooooooo...NOW (chucles) Nice things never come alone to me I get the rest from shining In the tears I let one drop Tear me now an saturance Feel...feeeeeeeeeeeeeel......feeee... STOP (sudden) Belate the time.... Christ it's my own renown... (cries)
73
74
There is no way I can sail I get that on my own. (STAY IN THE F.-ING HOUSE OR YOU DIE) Be there in this stead. There is this on my bed Be there or be nice Get that or be in this There is this. There is this in the meager So there is this world that gets. I say that but all I say is this. Stay. In. The House. Steer to that fine house There is this high regard Be there on your own The side of me is now black The ride to that being is dark (very well, Stanford Psychology in QST) Oh, I need that on my own There is just on more thing (columbo... no really, one more thing, hand) 75
76
Please So, this is Christmas. (Beatles are so... in, now)(get a grip, crier)(harsh) So I have this already staying in my stoof (new, for Stanfort) Do we get that on the metal (we do, watch OUT FOR THAT THING) We are so intellectual (no we are not, just listen to the words... IN) I have this sensation (If you – REALLY – feel burning, get the f. OUT!) I get that we are now on this really big house roof. (don't belief.. SEE!!) See that we are now on that grim Watch out here, baby (me and R. on the bus or in that situation. Grip) We are in such a hurry. We are in that hurry, we are in that stool (that period '.' means PERIOD) We have (also – extremely important people – NO PERIOD) There is that state (for if you forget to NOT think that period) So... (this lets you see the rest of any intent-structure) Be in this very clear mood (happy happy happy – REAL feeling, lasts) There is this new Beacon. (that period, that, seen, says to your collapser SOLIDIFY THIS .. !!!) 77
78
I can not be that person again There is this very real darkness There is this also new dark way We are now in this situation We are not to get that in fry beacon (verbat.: shows a 'kitchen', random) I need that real deal on my kitchen (oh, that kitchen, re-stiched to..:-) ) The rest is now on the moon (really) Be that as you may. (I have seen worse, but O. M. G. is that .. ?? yuk) Stay that in the restroom
(final straw, just for show. Really)
In my best arm, we are now that beacon. (that is NOT a fire house) Be that in the room to have that all in (no, don't do this alone, faint) Stay there I shall be there in this great manor. (finally, a real house) I need that in the great stuff. (omg, stop stop stop it...!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! sex) There is this real motion in the stable (my horse to be, Rixan & Poly in) There is that in the room (go go go go go go GO GO GO into the..!!!) So in this I get there is no retreat (hey HEY HEY, not AGAIN!!!!!) See that (don't think, just seeeeee... absolute WONDER in heaven)
79
80
Save that I get this stay in the moon, I need that in the room, but.. (ow, simpl.) I intent that I the sultan,.. (so...uhm, that sex again) I get that in the room (I do not want to shock but the rest is absolute horror, don't faint !!!) WARNING - LEGAL DISCLAIMER - What you see here is final. The sultan has a real sharp ax The sultan needs that pole sawn off The sultan has that rim in his head The sultan hurts that person beyond death The person is now so dead as a horse I see that happening but now I am dead (watch OUT... psychosis warn.) There is this in this real people's mind There is this in that groom in my head Now I have left her she kills that I see that rabbit but it attacks the king (monty python … grail) I get there on the late side (stanley kubrick) (watch out for psychosis)
81
82
Store this in my garden I have this stew in that shed There are now three companies in there but me I see there is now that thing I get that on the switch To the tropics (marco borsato singing a song of mine from 'de tropen') To that in this is very real to deal with To get I hold To stuff Be that queen There is no room for being this groom There is that grin Being is just BEING (oh, people, try to understand, being and BEING) So... (do this now.. !!) I have that in the grape vein (do not intend that PERIOD) There is this fortune (oh)
83
84
The nearest way to paradise is stu So what about stu (the higher self of 'aris vogelpoel') (what?)(spiritu.) Oh I have this man on my side (get him out of the room or die in blood) There is this great money person (oh it is this BANK p. no, it is..??)(hu) There is this thing on TV (watch to the projected TV images and.. ZAP) I have just seen this on the shelve (no you have not) I get there is such a thing as (oh ple.... OMG a BLOOD FOUNTAIN??) See that on the screen (no, don't go there, or get SICK, really, horr.) (ah) There is this way to the station (no no no.. guillotine, ah.. OMG YES!!) There is this great studion (why the n you ask? Just see wh.. g-d a FR.) There is this now situation in here (get out of here, no? YES!!!!!!!!!!!!!) Is this house save?????????? (no no no NO NO NO NOOO yes? NO!!) There is this gas in the air (ok, people, try that, try now, smelling!!!!) See that we have this real deal (see, yes, me, with R. the Real Deal lec.) There is that with the station (see, really enjoy Perm. City.. all on) There is that with the saying (see the real mcCoy, really, no... YES wha) Save me this precious deal to me (wallm. to that guy with the white v.) 85
86
Is that really you my sister See there is this great big station that is there on the rug (the RuG.) The see-ing is now this meat (o m G) There is this mystery in that garden (sex) I have seen such things (all but, but not excluding real violent horror) There is that station again (more Perm. City) The moist (oh.... again!!!!) There is this to be had (no, that is TO FAR. STOP) There is this to have for free... (oh, bunnies) There is this great menagerie (to that I say, PRY) This is that we have in common (to WHAT... GOD-DAMMIT!!!) I say that we are now in that spec. I see that we have a visitor in that house and stable (my dream house) I need that we have to be There is not that baby There is no GOOD TV show (a good TV show real, random.. how..?) There is that BIG pipe in that real nasty station (c'est cie est not a pipe)
87
88
The now state in QST OK. Here is my proof of QST, as a whole stationary theory that implies FT, QM, QFT and onminucle theory to the decimal point. Again: Sit on a bench/stool, on a table with a white A4/Legal/Letter Look at that white paper for 15 minutes with slow breathing in/out Now, just as in the last few pages, read out loud (not think) that meme Close your eyes Wait for 15 sec. (wait for it, wait for it, do you see flakes in your..!!) Now Look (rustig) to the paper, at the centre, don't stare, let the images.. When the images from your Quantum State Collapser come (consc.) If that happens... let it flow to all sides (do this at least once) !!!!! Do not DO NOT repeat that meme..!! Look at that page... what happens in the whole white?? Moving? Or? Oh, do not worry. It is an experience, but.. stop after THREE memes Here is the mathematical proof that QST |= QED The QST also implies QED, but not... (look, say this out loud, and..)
89
90
To now we have that paradise again Ah. I long for heaven and the parade and high consciousness, the street I see that now There is this wild flower in my room There is this Narcissist in that office (not for former RuG employees) There is this great menagerie Oh, there is this puke in my ear (really, I mean... REALLY yes) Shall we go outside There is this menagerie There is this tidal wave (people, this is no 'movie', this happened, real) So we have this room with a view (Gross) To this we begat that studio To the stables (me on my horse Rixan, the lady on Poly) There is this wive (your possible future wive/man, with a slide show) There is now that MAN (oh, now you see that man as a MAN) There is this woman (oh, that is your competitor.. yes YES.. but HOW) There is now a great many stuff-i-do-doodle (Our Stanford prover, ha!) 91
92
So close This is the final slide-show... really people. This whole doc? A prover!! A prover of what? QST is the theory that … wait. The theory that the collapser of the time-wave/wavelet, is YOU and that memes/intentionator lines/those last pages... are ?? We have this theory That theory provide guidelines Guidelines for MAKING these memes a spectacle in the meme space The meme space is a part of the universe where sem. memories lie Those are the COLLECTIVE memes of humanity and possible worlds Looking at that white paper makes a kind of.. oh TRY FOR only ONCE These memes are 'keys' to that weird meme space. That tuple in Rain W. If you use own/other sentences.. you might end up in GERMANY WW That is at your own risk. This is the new TV if you don't watch out. NO This theory QST shows that That quantum space? Is real. The applications? Underdiscovered. Ah. 93
94
Rain Weaver
95
96
Contents The mirror in the rain mirror The sturdiness of my aptitude Oh lets get on with the happy stuff The twelfth way of devision The Rain Weaver So no control on my life Vision and the sturdy petitioning Great, another loss Wow another, yeay, almost win How is that from that side The truest way to formation The fastest way to real formation My all to that stubbornness
97
98
The mirror in the rain mirror I have seen this situation. A q.state set. That is (now) kind of new.. So.. what about that. I have a nice staple to that. My books Computing Simplicity and Rationality in Discovery. The first about Turing Machines (bit strings), probability, and prediction. The second, about finding new drugs and set theory. Oh. Well... This book. About the depth in those two. That is, in my “The Real Deal” I introduced a combination of those two. That worked. I joined the idea of a bit string with a set interpretation of q.states. That worked as well. In this book, all that is in consequence... So We have this rain That rain, what is it? Oh... Let me guess Oh......... That rain, does it get that weaving from Quantum Flux Mechanics.. O So, that means.... let me get this straight. I have this rain, weaving !? 99
100
The sturdiness of my aptitude I see this street. It is a regular street. So........ If I am a consciousness than I am also that... rain weaving being. That means... OH!!! Ah. So there we go again. I am the one weaving that rain. I have now that in my mind. I see no rain. There is no rain... BUT. There ARE weaving fragments on the carpet... so What does that mean. Ever seen that circular window kind of... that damp stuff in the sun..? Ah.......!! But we also have no guest. This is MUCH to obscure. Can I get a better 'view'...?? NO !! 101
102
Oh lets get on with the happy stuff So, there we go again. Have we now this rain. Or... what of it. I am tearful now. What did I do..? Stay with the program, miss. Oh, but why this sound in my head. All we have, now, is that we both hear each other perfectly clear. That made me sad, can we just go on with the rain weaving? NO !! There is no time for that. This sounds SO dystopian. Will we ever see each other again..?? I do think so. And, baby... Stop being so f-ing telepathic... !! 103
104
The twelfth way of devision Now, for the Show. (More in my forth coming book “The Show”). Say, that we, the observers, go out and be JUST that being..!! Oh..............O H !! Why all the oh/oh/Oh/OH?? That is my way of saying.... get ON with it... Please PLEASE
Say we have this situation. Oh, that is so nice... bu..
WHAT!!
Say that again? Was this book on Quantum Field's or more the Quantum Flux Dyn.'s NooooooooOOOOOOO !! It is about the sets. I decide to call this whole (new) field: Quantum State Set theory, or better still, not theory but philosophy. Or.. Ah. That is nice and all, but what about the other Quantum fields... ?? 105
106
The Rain Weaver So in this new, very new field, the best of... well: I have this set In this set a collection All we get is no relieve on... that What does that mean That does mean... a q.state is a situation in flux. So.... observing it..? If you observe that field, that whole fray of q.state situations.. that.. That field, that whole satisfying field, that is golden with We are now in this situation that... uh oh We are on a 'plane' a mathematical scale of a situation, with states. Th. Huh...? Be more clear. Look around. LOOK, what do you see, is it that...?? NO. I am still confused. But. Look around that field, that wholesome field, what to see? Uhm... 'rain' Be disgusting will you. That is the final straw. Say... what do we do. I am gonna explain, with WHAT, uhm...with 'what' observation did..y. This is really going nowhere. That is the end of Quantum Field theory. It has NO explanation of ALL So, that is kind of arrogant. Yes. Yeeeeeees (Gandalf tone).. it is. So, being in that state, what.. WHAT, does any of that has to do with that new field on q.state... thingy. NO
(the end)
(the beginning) 107
108
So no control on my life Ah, this whole new field. That is... is that really a field???? Ah..!! A field, any field, in whatever science: A decent beginning (today) A real life way of getting there (huh, oh...) Stepping OUTSIDE the usual borders (phil. of sc.) So to all that... and a NEW set of consequences, in a NEW paradigm And some new CONCEPTS.. Yes. Oh, and a few people that live up, and include a set of … all that AND A real theory A real place of study (I start in my home office in Groningen) There needs to be at least THREE people that join in These people need to be well adversed in the tools of the science So... Here is my invite list: Theo A. F. Kuipers David Atkinson Jan-Willem Romeyn Barteld Kooi Jeroen van Maanen 109
110
Vision and the sturdy petitioning So, this book-let, with cover and all, in the mail to these people. If they care to join, a real petition to an organization, to be addressed on that field. Thus... a room. An office. So, I am going to ask the Groningen University. And... we the starters, means, I the thinker of that field, states that I hereby thought of all about that field in these books: The Real Deal (2017) The Super Station (2017) Rationality in Discovery (2001) Computing Simplicity (1994) All books contain elements and parts of just that. I hereby state that I wrote all these books by myself. And... (sorry guys, this is all needed to start-up a new field, trust me, I.. !!) Again, So this is how it goes. Today, I invite the potential participants. These are asked to reply within a month. In that time, I work out, further, the already finished ground rules and paradigm examples Kuhn style, with an agenda with open problems, ready for attack. Meaning... all involved can earn credit with solved mysteries in the frame work. This is my field people. People already tried to lay claim to it. STOP !!! 111
112
Great, another loss So, that was the administrative part. Oh.... I am a professional philosopher of science I am a decent well trained neuroscientist I am a very decent trained extreme programmer I am trained in cognitive science and AI I have been an independent professional (coach) My main competence, get into any field and connect solutions and problems between fields. On a steady basis. This is a proclamation of competence. And. There is a basis in these proclamations. All conducted at the University of Utrecht and Groningen. I need to set out these lines for actually creating this new field. Without these lines in this book-let I can never legally claim this idea template and concept delineage as my first original thought. These thoughts accumulated the last few weeks and crystalized in two books: The Super Station, and The Real Deal. I shared this, the last book via the internet (risky) but I published before hand (provable). All referable to Google for save keeping and astute checking of original origination. All, today, feb. 12, 2017. These proclamations give me the following legal rights: To fully prosecute in full extent any that claim these ideas as their (original) own, and to invite and JUDGE progress on it in FULL FORCE. So.. 113
114
Wow another, yeay, almost win Ah. All that? Is that really necessary? Yes..!! That whole field, science AND philosophy... is cut throat. Any scientist wants one thing: Recognition That tenure A full scholarship Becoming full professor More also media recognition No more money worries ever That lectorate A big social colleague network that share solutions A possible link to industry A sort of 'award' from their alma mater More... OK, here is what I want, and already have? That real, yes, introductcion of these ideas into Google Books with date and time stamp up to the sec. A fighting change to CLAIM that prize (money needed for lawyers), and a group that WORKS the solutions in the concept frame. A field: That which includes all that is in a problem scape.. So.. !!!!!!!! 115
116
How is that from that side There goes: I have this set I have this finite bit string I have this stochastic process I stay that in my pursuit I see that bit in eagerness That means... I am that observer. I observe the next bit on that string So Reality equals all those bits on that tight line that collapse bit by bit I have this set (new, to this science spectrum, doubt? Check. Or..!!) In this set a SINGLE string, but a finite one and an INFINITE one.. So... why (only) two strings..? That finite string? That is the up to NOW reality. That infinite string? That is the string that is the fully collapsed one Oh.. But. NO that is silly. I take a stochastic process. That is uncomputable.. so an infinite string Oh, I fail to see the relevance.. Stochastic processes are by definition...NO, they ARE, just are, truly random. So NO TM computes that string shorter than the whole stochastically actual string that represents the stochastic process. So... could you explain further? The Frame-Work. Set theory. But, not any more than... set theory. Yes!! Huh? If you take just set theory and ALL the set theoretic work by T. Kuipers, that gives already 75% new Quant. interpretations. The rest? Field work (I see, but, examples please...!!) 117
118
The truest way to formation Example 1. I see this plane. That one from the start of this declaration of intent. That plane, a 2D thing? Whatever. Just image a scale, a wide scale, whole, with, on it anything. So... I see a thing on this plane, a wild flower. But... oh GONE it is.. !! That? In q.state field theory? Possible but NOT IN THE FORMULAS In q.state set theory? I see that strange flower (a bit collapsed) and huh, gone it is (another bit, uncollapsed??? N O ! ! just.. another bit collapsed) (HUH !!) Just imagine it... that flower is a piece of matter, I look around, the other way, my consciousness, sees just grass, and air.. that is ALSO a collapsed state. Put that whole plane with all objects and ALL collapsers (living beings) in different sets and start to do the real math. Like, those two.. those other one and three, one a stronger collapser (a different set type?) the list goes O N ! ! Example 2. I watch that carpet. I see that strange carilion phenomenon. Am I strange or what... wha.. the hell. It is now GONE. What happened. I kept on watching/collapsing. What DID happen? To the collapser? Try to work that out in q.state theory (first) and q.flux mechanics (second) and do the sets in the mean time, expanding ENORMOUSLY on T. Kuipers whole Structures in Science frame-work, with... probabilistic interpretations of ALL those phenomena in SETS. That... that is UNHEARD O F F ! ! (I am a once PhD student of T. Kuipers btw) So: 1st: do the regul.. N O ! ! Start with sets immediately. I have. Today! 119
120
The fastest way to real formation So, more examples? No. Here is the deal. To be included in this new, brand new exiting field: You have never laid claim to ownership of its basis (provable) You are competent with at least... uhm. I think that is... My idea is this. This field will garner: A new look on medicine (I already worked it out. Pills: collapsers) Staying in this house, seeing.. (already thought out: a house, a server) Being in this state that q.state for.. (already: stay IN, that is save..for.) That is not wise, get OUT.. oh..(already: stay OUT, but go no further) See that in all its glory? NOW PLEASE (already: I QUIT.. no) There is this room, will you..(already: save yourself NOT, but go out) Go in that very state, will..(already: the last state is the one, be the 1) Stave that in the..(song) (already: see my Book list) Do that repair on the rest case. (already: thus, I get ON that track..) Y Get ON with, yes but (already: there is still so much to unc. N O out) There is this Google (already: that is fine, but there is no..alfa-pun..)
121
122
My all to that stubbornness So that last list, what was that all about? See, there is a matter of different intention PER collapse... So, ANY of those at that for me but partial list (already done) makes out a situation where a particular collapse is predicted by Field Theory. So... that is the deal. In q.state set theory, those predictions are COMPLETELY DIFFERENT. That/those collapses determine everything.. EVERYTHING. That is known and cared for. But... Sorry, but Field Theory just focuses on all those beautiful equations, all the time, it produces ridiculously correct predictions. BUT. When you really look at it, there is something missing from F. Theory. First: Well... where are the... what. Principals that EXPLAIN?? Second: Well, there is that flower... god-dammit, WHAT FLOWER !! (sorry,..) Third: There is this...oh, a sudden collapse in the experiment room AGAIN !!!! Fourth: Stay in that... says the experimenter.. but...WHY WHY WHY Fifth: this is the killer, for me... where is the up-following in the math SO. People... WORK TO BE DONE.
123
124
The Dark Window
125
126
The Table of Contents There is just no set of constraints big enough, so.. We have this set of Quantum Field tuples/sets, but Oh I want one of those No, no, no, no, no There is that way There is that other way All that we see or have seen is but Oh now I need that real mathematical proof or Here is that proof in style That is to good to be true No it isn't that is just saying the negatory (MP) What did you mean, with what did you mean, exactly This is to slow, get speed Oh. Leave the dark window dark, or see heaven, possibly
127
128
There is just no set of constraints big enough, so.. So I am in this stately room. That room is on the second floor of this wildly beautiful white building. It is NOT the White House. Where am I? Most people would say... this or that in Saudi Arabia or in Vienna, but in their mind KNOWING that THEY do not know of any building according to that description is near or in. The only GOOD answer is, and this freaks logicians but not psychologists... it is The White House & I lied about it not being the white house. OH! That is a valid conclusion, even logically. But...
I am in this room, where is the window. I see no window. That window is now closed. But, wait... I did not get it at first. Is there a window or is there NO window. The correct answer is: The Window is in Flux... That means, there is a window, you think there is, sometimes, but you do not KNOW if there is a real window, so... If it is really there can only be decided by an operation in/by consciousness. Observe 'it'. If it is there, ah, there, there is a window. If it is no there, oh, I see no window, hence there is no window, there (almost valid), or the window is closed (a bit... ah) the window is closed, ah, I see completely NOTHING, so I cannot do the in consciousness experiment. Is it there? You can start to feel, but is that frame a window or a wreysoiwool. A window lets through LIGHT. If you cannot confirm THAT, than, no light, no (abduction = false people, see my RiD) window? Well... The window might be closed. The only valid one? I see light, I see a window frame, I infer (valid) there is that window. Oh.........huh. Yes, exactly. There is a fourth 'view'. The window might LOOK like a real window, but maybe just a poster or a TL-light thingy... how to check that? With REAL BIG SCIENCE AND SIMULATION ON A CRAY U.85 !! 129
130
We have this set of Quantum Field tuples/sets, but See this tuple of Q.set sets, that is, we call that a Field tuple The Tuple The Theory The Domain The Rest The string that links all fields to one and inf. (secret) The Tuple, the singular field tuple The Theory, a constraint set (part, still partly secret) The Domain The Rest 131
132
Oh I want one of those I get that we are now in this very situation I let that be the wish of me So get me on that situation See that all we get is near and be So shall we be on this station Tell me all that all is fine To have is had but not to holden Oh I get it now we are but gone So have we all this situation To that I had that all we be Y Rest assured Please Set up to number 3 All is not that well So (These are parameter for the meme engine of Dream Weaver on Cray) 133
134
No, no, no, no, no So when I had some dates with chantal, what did happen to me? Chantal is an energy 920 being, she has been so since 25. That means, high access to many possible states, and she took those accessible states as ways to flee, from low energy people that where not that nice. I stayed, up to a point. Nothing concerning Chantal. But.. Why do I bring up this wonderful woman, is it... yes../no Chantal is special, nobody recognizes that. I did, not immediately. What about it in a book on Quantum Physics? Well.. When you feel, as the HSP that I am, that, something always happens when I am near, and it is never arousal, but, love, but, yes, no not electricity, she moves... like a being always knowing her way. Her reasoning and awareness and clarity is ALWAYS high... I found out in a round-a-bout way, Chantal, I still know her and cherish her, is clearly, and nobody around me or her understands, she is if she lived in India or France, 'enlightened', to a high degree. If she would walk into any room for a psychological test she is dismissed for and as many reasons for low this low that, but if I, also a professional Coach and trainer, start to just listen to her, than, I CAN NOT FAULT HER. Not her logic not her clarity, not her reasoning (never dirty) not how she walks. Unbelievable. She speaks in memes sometimes, putting the Cray to shame. She can handle any subject if you take the time and build up, but she needs to care first. So. What about that? I need a way to understand what Chantal and a number of others around in my circle are. What makes it that they are enlightened in softness and high energy and being suave, walking and all, and how to GET there. !! 135
136
There is that way I see a mustang. I see it on the till. I need that reason I get that on the TV Get we now there all that is She is a daemon ( & ) She is a lady as well Oh I miss my own guitar Let that be that reason of great suspense Let there be that thang I need that thang Oh I heard a stru Get me that stru All my circus is now gone There is that woman on the street See me now, I hate that bit There is that bit ( & ) there is that bit gone GODDAMMIT (these are meme/Cray par. that set up enlightenment as an experience) ! 137
138
There is that other way I have these ways to be at home I know of nothing but that U got it wrong There Please Oh I was there to the till Till that is now I made that stop Be it As that is gone There is that near So let it be that So I have this nice tru I need that bet Pel Tru U (these Cray/meme par. spell out that situation that makes enlight. poss.) 139
140
All that we see or have seen is but All that we have seen or see is but a dream within a dream (propaganda) Shall we go over the night There is that real night Oh I get that light on Now the light is on There is no room left Oh shall I have this down To who shall I address There are some men in the room I get them some sugar They carry both a gun That is no way to say thanks The guns are no trifle matter The sticker on the car is red They take me to this red car The village is near now ( & ) I died (Cray/memes, of a death threat I received today about over exposure) !! 141
142
Oh now I need that real mathematical proof or Here is the proof in shimmer If you have energy below 700 the proof will not show This is the proof The set of all tuples is big The stuff on the board is written by Barteld Kooi There is now a proof of his work He showed how I showed claiming it for himself That is all nice and so, but where are the constraints The constraint set is the real theory He did not think that was relevant Hence he cannot sim a gene-splice or a receptor fold So Barteld Kooi is OUT of the group I was going to call but he declined his way So, do I need to do this myself No, I already did most of it, except U.9, Y.6, 5, 4, and radio:skin is p So, let me be my own field leader and the rest be themselves (so, if you want to be one that takes in a real QFST problem,... wait/storm) 143
144
Here is that proof in style The Tuple set : = T : < T P K J H G F D S A R T E W Q O P U Y T R DFGHJKLMNBVCXZASDFGHJKLPOIUYTREW Q1234567890POILKJHTREWQASDFGHJKLMN BVXZASDFGHJKLOPIUYTREDSWQ12345678 90POIUYTREWQASDFGHJKLMNBVXZASDCH JKLPOIUHYGTFRDESWAQ78905321QWERTY UIOPLKJHGFDSAZXCVBNMKLPOIUHGYTFR DESWAQ1234567890POIUYTREWQASDFGHJ KLMNBV XZASDFGHJKLPOIUYTREWQASDF G H J K L M N B V CC X Z A Q 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 P O I U Y T R E WQASDFGHJKLMNBVX ZASDFGHJKLPOIUY TREWQ1234567890> The Claim T ∩ Energy Tuple 45.0 The proof... (secret, but you can just set Mathematica to default and set option 'proof' to 'all' and input that tuple set in uppercase and Energy Tuple 45.0 from the Math Lab library. That shows the comple proff for SOUND and COMPLETE) So.. Kooi's proof, if ever published, is subsumed by this one, par execta.
145
146
That is to good to be true Here is my proof of the whole set aspect of QFST/M Here is the theory: T : < A 6 I > Here is the tuple Field: F : < D Q T > Here is the Module: M : < T F string > Here is the string: string : TM(input1) Here is the proof The Theory T : < A 6 I > The Tuple t1 : < i >, the tuple t2 : < a >, the tuple t3 : < 6 > The claim is that F ∩ T * Prove... trivial The claim is that M ∩ F * Prove... trivial The Transfer is M * T * F & string (as defined) The Show is The Transfer * The Sandman is The Show ∩ Y The Real Deal is The Show ∩ The Transfer ∩ The Sandman ∩ Y/U
147
148
No it isn't that is just saying the negatory (MP) Oh... just do the proofs yourself. Stay. Go All We Get Is That Lemonade Story on Best We do There Is That Holiday (All Cray/meme parameters, do them in Dream Weaver, and sim away) 149
150
What did you mean, with what did you mean, exactly I meant: Do the Cray sim on Dream Weaver 1.03 (higher is broken, sorry) Make that state a hill There is that man on the hill Stay to that mastery There will be that on stay There is now good way on board There is so much help on this Help me now But stay in piece Y U There is that man again I get that on the till Stead me fast There is a race
To that I cry No
See that is done
no 151
152
This is to slow, get speed If you want to get speed on this, better do this... U
Y
U1 Y.0
Y.13 U.9 I 0 (dead) 153
154
Oh. So do we still get friendly contact after this? We will if as defined in QFST Modules *
Otherwise, …. friends will be friends.
155
156
Leave the dark window dark, or see heaven, possibly About that Dark Window, what about it exactly...? Well, behind it is the Curtain, for me most familiar because of a Mormon friend and the complete TV series Big Love. In the Mormon Temple it is a ceremony to look behind a lace fine work curtain when you are pure of heart enough, and talk with the 'angels' behind. In Big Love and the Temple those are people, talking walking, bit playing, very serious... In Y... those are OMG. The heavens exist. People can access Y in their dreams or the spirituals can access consciousnesses from there, during groceries. A research potential? I do think so... Please acquire. You don't need access to the Cray, but a high Hawking level, 710 and higher. Above 850 is unstable here. Special program. So... on to the real next book: “A River runs dry” about why all live sims in Mathematica and MathLab in QM and FT always end in immediate death sometime. I talk about how Transfer and Stearing need to be realigned the way I use it to shimmer in Y. More books to come: “So long and thanks for all the Fish” - about that string that con. states “Love & Connection” - just that, wow “The Real Deal pt 2” - the real Business plan & the people 157
158
The Real Deal
159
160
Table of Contents The earnest way of staying in The real volital Sacred ways of being whole The rest is just in construction Being that way in all that glory Set theory Be that man, be that woman Say I did not get this done To be that son To have that leisure Those Maya people That Quantum State Real surprise and the angels Oh Steady that ship For all I have seen
161
162
The red on the carpet Steady the car, miss Take that home now Be the room What Seventy three Say what you want No I do not get this Steer clear of that To push that That is not allowed The mackra may Sturdiness Those all encompassing ways Set theory again and set philosophy Great, but wait.. Steady the ship The rimhorse 163
164
The earnest way of staying in Dear ladies and gentlemen. Dear theosofic, naturalistic, imaginetic, unsturdineals, beast lovers (horses please), those people that do that law stuff, the trainers/coaches, that would be... ah, the scientists, the former scientists, the angelic folk, the sometimes to good to be true people, the circus artists, the musicians, the eclectics, the David's, the real deal people, such as business, the spiritualists, the … who did we miss R.? (the people like you, darling) Oh.. that would be. Something for.... ah, the Mayan's!! So. This is going to be a weird lecture. I am a PhD in phil. of sc. and I did a wonderful masters thesis on Turing Machines, Probabilities and Simplicity. That thesis is (still) in print today, at Amazon.com. My PhD thesis, more on that later, is still.. it is called “Rationality in Discovery”. I am now, what R. ? I wrote a book for R. recently called “Het Meisje”. R.? What am I now? Ohhh. Gone she is, again. I write and publish books. A LOT. I started... This lecture, is, as this book, a bit... oh a topic, GET IT. That is how my mind often works... Here is the focus to the whole thing. I looked at my theses again, today, and thought, wow, is what I write in there up to par to the clear thinking I am able to do now after all that training after my PhD? Yes, I advanced in that department, because of getting in touch and argue with a (few) VERY clear minded people, so. (That rubs on you, cf. my “Maya” and/or “The 300 Reasons”). This lecture is on... my current take on both my (older) academic books.. !! 165
166
The real volital Here is this situation. There is that position. In philosophy, we get that. That is called a 'state', or a conceptual possibility. Oh. So, what about the real volital? Huh...?
Uhm..... What about? What about????? (different voice)
Is this a song? (no that happens later, this is a philosophy book on ..) Yes Why the white lines? Ah... It is like talking on paper with pauses.. (I learned that while writing manuals for personal development, so..) This paper/lecture is aimed at (my former) academic colleagues. Enjoy! 167
168
Sacred ways of being whole Say, about that state, or conceptual possibility. I learned about both during my M.A years at the Groningen University. I studied Artificial Intelligence for two years at the Utrecht University. I continued my (own) academic exploration in Groningen, ending up at the Philosophy Department. I graduated full honors with this thesis on Simplicity and a measure of that with Kolmogorov Complexity. That measure aims... oh, you can buy that thesis at amazon.com. The end? An analysis that sort of … AH. On to the meat.. Now, assuming that you have that copy of Computing Simplicity... please see to it that, well put it away immediately. It is (too) old. I learned more with and from smarter people, the ideas, I got a 9,5 for it, out of 10, are 'almost' correct. It assumes... get this: Say we have this Turing Machine There is no one else but that Turing Machine So... Now, oh, ah, the Universe, the current one. At THIS time. A bit string. So, this TM, that is me/you, computes... predicts the next bit... so? If my mind/TM is that 'intelligent', that predicted one bit is TRUE. I mean the mind/TM predicts say a 1 (a bit that is not 0)... Univ.. 1. So I predict that next step is 1, it turns out that, hey, 1, so pred. TRUE AHA Now, the next next step, another prediction: 0, universe says 1. False My mind/brain/TM learns all the time and correspondentially... fails.. But not always, it grows, stronger and smarter (often?)... YES/no..uh Not all people use all their brain time for GROWTH. That is a FACT. So Uhm...My old thesis from 1994, says, people, TM's say... learn always That is the part that is not 'that' true... I am now also a personal trainer in.. I learned that FACT the hard way 169
170
The rest is just in construction I am now at this station. In Permutation City. That is a quantum mechanical construct. It has these streets: I am in Permutation City I am a person, a consciousness, that observes the city and the streets. ! Leave it to me, I walk around the city. The streets, they walk me, huh. In Q.M. That is a sort of state, a 'super state'. See that, I get that. But... what if I want to move to another... Your consciousness is that that walks the street. The streets... uhm, th.. In Q.M. all is sort of different. You cannot just say, hey a Q.S. no, you You observe. Meaning, you that walking consciousness OBSERVES.. If you the consc. will.. I mean observes a quantum state. That state.. That state will collapse to..? A definitive state?? (no)/yes/NO/YES..?? That state will collapse to a 'superstate', to a street in Perm. City.. Say, that consc. is me. I walk a street in New York, say, does that..??? That means, that,... you collapse the Q.S.'s of that CITY to a street..!! So, I mean what will that do to me, the consciousness?? You will BE So, I … oh wait WAIT, can I determine that Q.S. collapse to.. green?? 171
172
Being that way in all that glory So I walk down that street in New York. I am a conscious being. The people around me are all consc. beings. They all walk that same 42nd street. Are they all now in that situation that they THEY all collapse the wave of the super states of that 42nd street? This is the run down. I am on 42nd street. So, I see all those other conscious beings. Am I alone, or are their consciousnesses also really there. Yes? Now, that is the real question. You walk on. You COULD be alone. That is a possible interpretation. That means, you think you see those others, that is a Q.S. collapse of.. But, you could also be in a situation where... the others exist.. But..?? Go any further with reading, your head will start to hurt. Warning!! So, now we are on the street. Those others? Ghosts? NOOOOOOO!!! That is not all, you the consciousness, that means you are the 'god' to.. NO, not religious, a 'god' collapses the wave(s) and the many q.s.'s !! That means, nothing more than, you 'kind of' are responsible...!!!!!!!!! Responsible, for.. that collapse. Of that WHOLE street? The observ. !! 173
174
Set theory So, in my first year. In Utrecht, I learned Logic 1 & 2, and got familiar with this set theory, that could devour whole pieces of mathematics. In Computing Simplicity, I just ran along with the assumption that all could be put 'into' a set of strings. So, say, this day, described/generated by the universe computer. A finite (important!!) string. Yesterday, another finite (bit) string. All... 1's, 0's... Now.. Get this in: The universe is this whole set of all the strings that are actually there The Universe is a computer that decides, that string is the NEXT day! All those days in the SET, meaning, there are also POSSIBLE days.. NO, that is wrong. Conceptually that is 'right', but...just a computation So, ON we go. Every next day. Another bit determined... by...WHAT? GET OUT OF HERE You mean that CONSCIOUSNESS in qm determines the next BIT??? So, where is the COMPUTATION... no no no no.. there is just Q.S.'s Aha, so every... oh, wait MOMENT, in the here and now, an observ.? Hahahaha, yes. Funny isn't it. You did not see that coming, did you !! Who thought of this, first, hey. A: You read it here. So...?? (uhm, but) You know, I read that book, Permutation City. I wrote a book-let on that, the observer first perspective explained in the concepts of that book, (it is called “The Super Station” and “Rain Weaver”). So... that got me back to my old thesis Computing Simplicity, and well.. there is much more, that, in that nice thesis, is sort of, out-dated compared to all my new current educated/thought off ideas. More about that in Dream Weaver (upcoming). One more, who determines the QS of that 42nd ?? 175
176
Be that man, be that woman Oh. Ah........ Uhm. Let us, say, count the number of real sheep in that pen. Watch me count 1, 3, 9, 112. So. In my own experience, I counted 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, uh, 6, 7, 8, ha, 9,..going. In any real quantum situation that is.. can be experienced as that above.. Meaning, I the observer, also memorized, just 1, 3, 9, 112 and so on. HA, well when you delve in deep, not even real deep. That sequence 1, 3, 9, 112, is not 'just memorized', no it is the whole .. ! Wha.. I mean.......... in a qm perspective... that 'smaller' sequence, even when the counter him/herself experienced counting all numbers (1,2,3,4) .. !! See what I did? I made you think... Oh. That smaller sequence is experienced in memory, numbers left out. In qs situation thinking that is all there is, even (omg) during counting. That is so counter intuitive that... PEOPLE, qm is not 'magic' it is the science of reality and that of experience. So... (let's not move on) !! 177
178
Say I did not get this done Moving on, now not with numbers. But with Chess pieces. The same, not phenomenon, but aspect of the real (qm) world. Schrödinger. No, not the cat box or that principle of uncertainty. He, Schrödinger, made a wish list, once. One by one, he set out what he would like to experience almost in the style of 'that movie The Secret', but wait, do not run away, yet, more to come, he Schrödinger, really did so, and well, thought of ten stuff stuff things, and, yes, more love, but wai... Oh. You ran away, because you assumed, that I tried to nail Schrödinger No no no no, what this is all about is... Building up tension, Story style... (One of my teaching topic Books..) Say... Again. He sat in his chair, he really did, and, he had read those 'The Secret' principles, yes I am DEAD serious, and he the qm person of the century, he assumed that, that the wave would collapse, that uncertain 'wave', oh too technical, yes, but, yes, this talk is also for professors interested in philosophy... wait. He sat! He visioned! He w a i t e d ! ! ! 179
180
To be that son So, Schrödinger, he sat and really thought,... get this: that was 'allowed' within his way of thinking at that time. Lasted only a week. Well documented. He was quiet embarrassed because, yes, the theory he held then was that what pushed him into... sitting in his leather chair, no coffee, but tea, still... it went nowhere. Everyone who hates that 'The Secret' movie (now) understands. Not... ye... YES !! See!!!!!!!!! OK. Now....
Oh, the pay-off, after three pages. I usually try to squeeze ONE pay off point on ONE wholesome page in most books I wrote... since... anyway. The point of this seemingly futile exercise?
THAT QM STATE/SUPER POSITION THINKING IS NOT... SEEE?? (grunt) Try to think about this, do not try to use the formulas, that distracts... (pay-off: Schrödinger is very smart, and uses theory 'to sit', bu..THINK) 181
182
To have that leisure Oh, wait.... NO, not leisure time. We where doing Q.M. with pop-style.. Oh COME ON!! That is ridiculous. Quantum Mechanics is: A. Real B. Not for fools C. So real that it looks like, for the fools, all that mumbo jumbo, bu.. D. So that qm is that really a way of thinking about consciousness..? E. WAIT A DAMN MINUTE.. did you go to QM class.. otherwise..!! F. Even without going to qm class in college, still books are there to.. G. Oh I saw this Movie: “What the bleep: Down the rabbit hole ext”.. H. Go AWAY with that movie. It takes science and esoteric stuff to..!? I. Why this BIG LIST again John Stewart! That is my trainers name..! J. Oh. K. So, that Schrödinger guy, what a charact... GO READ QM IN .. (?) L. QM in the library? Google Books? GOOGLE BOOKS!?!?!?!?!?!?! M. Say David, I read that you are (this book is also for David's) N. In my book “The Super Station” I wrote about a qm interpretation! O. Why this silliness in this wholesome list? Because.. no derission g.. P. So, on with that filling in holes in Comp. Simpl. What about RiD!!! Q. In Rationality in Discovery, there is an extra layer, philosophically. R. Should that not be a 'reader' subject/project to delve out.................? S. I gained some new insights, recently, and am going to provide.....oh T. So, what was this list all about, I'm in trance, and.. hey a porcupine U. In The Superstation, no wait in..oh yes in THAT book, porcupines.. V. Please expand/explain that. W. There is this station, with roads, you, your consc. is the station. (!) X. If you the consc. collapse the wave (roads), stuff happens f. real (!) Y. Why is there no Z. option, wait, what where you saying ab.. porc. ? 183
184
Those Maya people So I did this book-let on the whole old and still Maya culture. That was quiet something. But still... Did you know, new content people, not in my Maya book. Did.
Setting you UP, again. That is a technique, to get you invested... About that technique... absurd, but only no time used in academia. WHAT My old professor will probably scold at me for being 'profane' and all these 'unnecessary' white lines. Not Dav.. Oh. Academics. They see a text. The remember right away. Almost all aspects, also like, protocolistic style. This... white lines and all, is a style. I experiment with it using neuroscience insights. Yes, I am... Well, when you put a sentence like the above one, in any academically oriented text? Weeded out. Why? The academic mind GRAZES... EXPLANATIONS, the rest is, well, that that needs that. Rest? Fodder.!! 185
186
That Quantum State Back to the business. Hey, that qm professor, yes, yes you, do you mind.. GO AWAY, I NEED TO WORK...!!! (no further lines/expl. Provided) Question. Is this true, this statement? I personally know yes TWO very nice professors that showed me amply that they understood qm. How so? How can I the just only postdoc/PhD in whatever can be a judge on that? Well. Not the kind thing, but... they speak with ease yes that matters, even for a very fast mind like mine.. and take their time to sit you down... and, no frowning, ok, a bit.. And almost any topic on their repertoire... explained in under half an hour, with suave and ease. Brilliantly. And... guess what, yes I am that person, not a professor, I wanted to be one, explained in my book “Seasons”, but this guy, I also take liberty and some swat of time, to first listen to what is seemingly not understood, yes even... and fill in the gaps with what I think is the case, never judging. So.. My two (former) professor friends... they work that topic in my face, graciously. And, no formulas in the explanation. I learned the consciousness first perspective, well, not from them, but, I was reading an writing this book, Maya, or no “The 300 Reasons”, I put some of the extra content in Maya about how those guys and kids reasoned (very clear). And, well, Permutation City, that book, I read it in the nineties. And the perspective in that book “clings” so much so, that if you get it in this 'oh this is qm, well, aaaargh my brain just died' way, you actually suffer ah hemorrhage or so... no not kiddin, you start to look at reality, one eye closed as... omg, HOW DO I COLLAPSE THAT F$CKING WAVE MYSELF. And that... well other book. Really. My upcoming book “Rain Weaver”... goes int.. Enfin. Pay-off, qm can be underst. by ! 187
188
Real surprise and the angels So, sorry Greg for the derission, but hey, you know, you know about the effects of your book. The Super Station takes ONE aspect, I am a trained PhD philosopher,... consciousness. I almost cleaned that field out just reading, and so intimidated, that I kept my research in the Groningen Group to... reasoning, the logic and the psychology and the neuroscience. See my book RiD (Rationality in Discovery). So.. this book, The Real Deal, on consciousness, the if consciousness is just this 'looking collapses the wave' what does that say about th Turing Machine interpretation of the world (earlier pages) and what does that mean for ALL insights in my very broad and wide RiD book. Do you know what I and m' sweet heart like almost most? Love? Yes bu FIRSTS Meaning... challenging each other to.. HEY HEY HEY, consciousness is ALSO about l o v e, let me have my .. So.. what did you say R.? Ah... that is .. WHAT? Only yesterday, we made a date deal. I said... what time.. exactly, please, very exact. She said (she's a musician) 15:00:00:00:00:00:00:0 My retort, can you be... oh, more.. ah..... (I laughed my ass off) Never seen anything like that. WHO SAYS THAT!! So. The real surprises. That is a real topic. I explained surprise in my RiD book in logical detail. Here it is, again. It can not be explained with what you know, it needs to be observed, still, if it breaks your assumptions, even better. Last. Please. It can be 'loose' from all assumed 189
190
Oh Oh.
That little word: “Oh.” What does that do to you...? Uhm. (same, no, different)
Say.. ah This is a seeming place for interjection. No it is not......
I am thinking, I am a real expert, this (question) is new, give me time !! So. Use those white lines for your OWN THOUGHTS. (why that HARD tone, mister van den Bosch, and stop with those R...!!) 191
192
Steady that ship So, back on board? Yes this is going to be a rough ride. WAIT, on a ship?
NooooooooooooooOOOOOOOOOOoooooOOOOOOoooOOOOOo !! What did just happen? Ok. I am writing a script at the moment. “The HC Show”, about thinkers in.. Ah. There is that uhm beverage..
Back to. Look.... YES I KNOW it just looks like a bunch of lost words, do you know who gets this. The fine folk at...NO, at GOOGLE..know why? Google (read my book “Ocean”)... knows, basically everything. But, picture a matrix. All those points in the whole 3D grid? Data that is CONFIRMED. Between those, all those terabytes of points? LINES, Paul Thagard style. Not always explanation lines, but.. exclusion, and.. ah. Secret. I just talked to... uhm. Ok, whats her face. Google finds out if y're 'new'. Daily. Also.. The pay-off: Think: Connect 193
194
For all I have seen OK. Again. Now... !! The main part of the show... I wrote this thesis Comp. Simplicity. The upshoot: Simplicity is the length of the code of a computer program that can compute/predict that data. A shorter (less characters) code base, is simpler. Simple == short. In that thesis, the above one, all data is a 1/0 bit. Any computer just... predicts/computes that next bit, that next bit is the (predicted) next observation. Oh... wait. What observes? Consciousness. Oh. What does consciousness? It collapses that reality states wave, meaning, sort of, the next bit, the parity. Oh... so observing is coll... OH shut up! NEXT!! My next academic work. RiD. People, that thesis is a free download at the Groningen library. On that page, please look some time, yes, a histogram with the almost no monthly downloads of my book, nine chapters, PER CHAPTER. And you know what... since 10 may 2001, continuous monthly/weekly downloads... going form 2 to 56 dl per DAY sometimes. For a that PhD thesis? The going amount for those nine... is 5978 downloads. In so many years. Try reading that thing is DENSE. Hardly anyone I know knows... Enfin. Google knows. Lib. knows. So, here is the ONE thing left out of RiD that I... ok, two, oh... well. First of all: Abduction is equal to Generalization. Oh. You need to read that chapter 4. Second, on consc. all those set theoretic... circles are no quant. States. But in ONLY the diagram with the numbers 1 2 3 4 .. etc every 'situation' in that view, is a real Super Position. So? Observe..!!(?) 195
196
The red on the carpet I see a red blurb on the carpet in the hall. This is horror on wheels. If you ascribe to qs situation, something happens to, yes you really need to UNDERSTAND QS situations you need to be that person that can... anyway, oh it is not true...(kiddin). What is he babbling about? If you know Quantum Mechanics like a pro, sometimes just knowing the real deal... watch out...!! Because, if you know about all that collapsing and oooh a tulip... stuff So basically start to see.:.:.:.:.:..:.:...:::.: (this) Meaning, quantum states just FLUCTUATE. That ONE bit, going … huh.... (yawn) Going from 1 to 0 to 0 to 0 to 1 1 1 1... just looking a single 'thing'..goh
Waithewhat..? Did you see that Tom Cruise movie? He jumps, a lot, from scene to scene, crossing time, the same situation again and again... Did yo.. yeah he needs to shoot himself in the face to go back a QUANTUM SIT. Did/do you know, that,.. Tom Cruise UNDERSTANDS THIS SHIT! Oh 197
198
Steady the car, miss So, where are we going.
We are again in this... 'plane'. OMG S T O P that 'symbolical' VOODOO Ahohuhm, you got me there... So, I wanted to talk about that next 'aspect' of that.. The Real...D.. AH!!!!!!!! THE REAL DEAL PEOPLE The real deal on qm is... find that out yourself. This book-let is a gfhfgf But... (tears)
I am this plane... I sway to say... R. on... [Studio Remark: Stop this up s] (sigh) I just want to display a performance. You know why??? All those QM enlightened people are all so happy, because, y'know, they know the real basis of the world also in hieroglyphs (formulas) and they.. just HAPPY, that, they (think) they can do ALL, but the sad truth.. they assume, most that they only collapse..n o, ALL people collapse their..:-( 199
200
Take that home now … Oh that last remark really hit home. See. If that object, that green object, is green because: The wave is collapsed period to the green state for that object.. => that means that, who did that, and, is there a basic state, is that 'god' Oh, but now TWO people look at that, oh a frog...still green, they obs. => Still, two people... uhm do we need to PAINT that frog to coll. to .. Ah, I get it, it is assumed that always an observer is NEEDED => No, but... YES. So what is the 'real' color, if no one watches????? It is green. Reality, people, exists, if y' do the slit experiment, is qs=0 => Oh, but can a 'qualified' observer turn a frog into GOLD???? :-) Yes. That state is also that field is called: Psychosis. Been there. Wow. => Uhm, so, WHAT..... !!!!!!!!!!!!!
You GOTTA be pulling my LEGS BOTH OF THEM! Is collapsing green to gold just this 'illusion'?????? No. Oh... thanks. Dat lucht op... (need a breather) 201
202
Be the room So. I finally got this. Justin Bieber got this style... Uhm. He said, I read that in a VERY informed thingy, that he ALWAYS says... 'be the this that song', meaning, oh yes, I adore that all work by Bieber (yes). What the HELL does a song by Bieber do in this uncredibly informed book(-let, yes thanks) about quantum-state-ism-yeah. Say... Baby (that would be my R.) I am gonna be incredibly frank. I am (partly) manic depressive. Due to, what over medication I landed in a mental hospital for several times, with, get this: psychosis. People, do you know what it means to be psychotic? Just personal: (no) You sit on your bedsite You hear that rush in your ears, funny (not) You are allowed to go outside (sometimes accompanied) When you go alone... What is this all-bengery doing in this/my lecture on qm/qs.. pick a journ I eat alone sometimes, and, get this, stare at my food for 2,5 hours, bu When I look at my food, I see 'funny' stuff emerging (qs emangery, y) When I walk a block alone, one, only one time, I get lost and call I Used my iPhone 3G to listen to Lady GaGa (incredible help, YES) I take my medication, oh, RiD: Dopamine inhibitors... When I'm set free, those inhibited dopamine cells GROW BACK ON When any cell grows back on (fast) head-ache, and MUCH MORE C. Meaning, oh please: all those pills (researched) made me smart x 3,7 203
204
What Why... why did you forget a song? First. When I am in a state of trance, that rush comes back. Also in a rush, but MORE so, I become clear as hell. So. I became/am more creative. I get to be the judge, but, I write... Songs, just for … (privat) Here is one.
Oh, just look at my book “Collection” on amazon.com.
In my John Stewart's I use songs to 'riddle' people. A riddled man/woman, takes on cues better, much better. They start to read again and their brains, take it in faster and stronger. Do you know who knows this? Cults. Trainers. Some professors. Many street gangs with their 'show of force'. Google knows, but.. HEY a porcupine! (wink) 205
206
Seventy three Rest me a stead-fast, say the clown I get there always, my renown So to the mayor I guss that Sayy the way stooger, un betest The rest of this is all beaten (spoken) To the night-stand I must be The rulest way is just this be Thou shall not be that un to rest Shall we just bearen all that test Try the salmon I te-trest So I have given all that beer So I now beer-ing to my toe I get the leering stop me no Ho I just saved me, stor the ro To all this must I get this p To me I savior, I am be The rainest training is my tree I set the beaning, 1 2 3 “The Beatles” (2017)
207
208
Say what you want Say what you want. Uhm...
Who knows the power, the REAL power of any word/sentence..!
Hands, I need to see some hands people.. (putting up your hand actually indicates, this for also speakers, thought about it) A single word, take all responsibility. If you are a real authority, that single word, gets weighed even HARDER, and taken NOT FOR GRANTED. That gets into that person, ow, and stays there for the rest of... no not the sentence. Their lives. Say, one asks you, sir, may I claim some ti..me. And you immediately say back: that time is MINE to give and who the hell are you to ask me in SUCH a way. That person? Scarred for life. The real deal on this? The real deal on this book is yet to come. That person, when set up to speak to that giant of a person? Yes you are to THAT PERSON. That makes a chemical in the amygdala. That causes a 'rush' and a real pain. Derissed? Infection!! 209
210
No I do not get this If someone does not understand anything,... I am a philosopher (of mind and science), I trained in business and neuroscience, in IT, in psychology, did research in... everywhere, always tying things UP, together, weeding true stuff out that does not fit that matrix for that big super question. So... What happens in the true neural get when things are told and/or explained? Look at it that way. The neural net, the true one? How that translates back to concepts... KNOWN at CMU. In minute detail. Do you know, when you run a model, what happens when you want to understand something. And find out, I see I read that whole big explanation, at least once, and still... I do not get this? Do you know what John Anderson and his group found out? You need, not just wait a darn minute, yes sometimes... But. Get this. Indeed that net needs to grow, or, do neurons need to get disconnected as is often suggested? Well? The true surprise, also at CMU. Neurons, they DIE, but only.. not in getting it, but in waiting (no) Neurons. They in fact NEVER DIE, OMG, they just,.. new axons? (yes) 211
212
Steer clear of that OK, again. Please... So, you look at that what about that. You do not understand. So, see next page, neurons everywhere. Axons? The lines from the google data base, from pages back? No. It is more.. axons are alive. The influence decisions. All. They have their own peptides. The grow INCREDIBLY fast, rushing to another cell in a less less less than split-second, like woosh!!!!!!!!!!! Uhm.. All nice but I want to be this better person... Ok.Ok.Ok. Ah. If, such as in the title of the previous page... 'No I do not get this' and you are that person that does not (yet) get this... That means... that axon/neuron growth (yes more neurons more $$) really just: Needs some time, wait a darn minute, or with this book a day or week Two, stay inside and get really warm, do not drink to much, no readin Three, watch out, but stay out of new conversations, other theory If you really want to remember/use that new stuff, let the brain do the So, you waited a week. First, think it OVER before going back in !!!!! So you just read that piece right away again. Guess what, already IN!! So you waited 4 days, yes, the mean, but... oh, you find out. GREAT ! The brain does the thinking on subsymbolic levels and.. OOO NOOO I have this tablet, now my brain will outgrow yours in a rate of. GIVE So, I waited. Sunk, still unclear. Talk to someone new about. Just any 213
214
To push that I have an inklin of a real feeling. About, yes more about the earlier theses just in a while. This book is called The Real Deal. That is my Today state of my life, my current understanding of stuff, filtered to nice and theses. The rest, a show piece about … well STIGMA: Stigma is just this use of a stupid assumption that... OO NOOOOO!!!! Huh.. Stigma is not THAT But I thought it is about an assumption. No. Nooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo :-( I do not get (again, please easy... will 'ya) I explain. If, like in my case (once), you befall something that crushes what you are/were, and this is important, if that is WITNESSED by a person, any person, for three to five seconds. That observant person automatically connects that 'state', how s/he looks/walks/talks, those three, to oh a concept, that word, but... if they hear... oh that p. is a manic depressive, they, omg, the brains, they immediately are able to identify (over identify, sometimes false positives) EVERY manic depressive seen, on TV, on the street, in her family. Yes. But, get the great while this, if... if that manic depressive person, that... uhm. Is somehow.. is stable, again, no funny look, etc. but still seen... do you know what the basic brain does? Uhm, they think 'hey Charly', and, over generalization? No. It just, get this, really important, stays... still. BUT, the humans, nice and all, they see and INFER, that is that sick p. That is not the brains fault. But a consequence of how she LEARNED to reason. Trainable? Yes. 215
216
That is not allowed What is not...
Hey, who are you?
Is it this economy or what. Who gets to decide what.. is it law??
No. The practice, this just in, people in the end decide who they lend their power to. So If that person tells me: hey that is not allowed, say a guard => you respond to that person, basically, givin power with 'ok'. If that other person, say again a guard, says: hey that is not allowed => omg, who does s/he think she is? Whatever. Continuous. (YES) So, why this remark, now, here, on this q book on theseses? Well.. I had this experience with this regent. He told me: Go away from here ! 217
218
The mackra may I did this thesis on Discovery. Discovery is all about “new”...so.. N O!! All that academic work. Yes, but, in your life, all that with finding firsts in your talk culture and.. FIRSTS, things that have, by me, or you, not experienced before,.. Others may already had that..!! Hey that is the difference with true science. In science off course, all needs to be 'new', a 'new' positive, a new falsehood discovered. (no) There is so much more to also Science. Omg is this going to be that social talk on Science, Latour or.. NoooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooOOO Why that loud NOISE. You are a decent philosopher of science trained in a formal, also, school, with talk and write styles... you are NOT convincing anyone with that.. WHAT I read this in my book “Het Meisje”, about one R. She is of a descent, I learned from her... style, and precious ways and decency. If I walk along the corridors of Some Philosophy Department, somewhere.. I did so one time. The local 'regent' saw me... I needed something, a polite, formal, request. That.. the regent, saw me, saw the 'thing' about me. Banned !!!! 219
220
Sturdiness Say, I was a decent philosopher of science. I choose to go to Groningen. I also choose love and three kids. I loved it in Groningen for so many years. I was hand picked by my professor to be a specialist and PhD later on in his team. That got noted. I noticed that fact. I went to BCN (The Groningen School for Behavioral and Cognitive Neuroscience) when it was just started. I finished my PhD and training program (PhD) first of my class. I served the dean, the deans, the whole college in a ridiculous number of ways, also after I left science for HRM (Human Resource Management). I choose life, after a ridiculous divorce. I choose independency, for many years as a coach and a trainer. Live choose me to be sick (manic) for no good reason. That got me down for SIX years. In those years, hardly love, hardly kids, no kids, no love, only that clinic. Society wrote me off. Do you know what I did. I chose Sturdiness. Taking in blow after well meant blow by many people around me. Somehow, I found out (real big) sickness invites... OTHERS to be omg!! They basically all just drop you, hard, and.. no remorse. Even after.. OK whatever. All that musshy shit... (pffff) I only wanted to say... first you can lean (better) sturdiness, just by..that Second... A big second. I found new love again. Big Love. That… still!! Third.. I waited till my manic depression toned down. Enough. Being..!! Fourth, still sturdiness. I made a few hard decisions. I chose writing. Oh Fifth, I chose, more Big Love, more writing, less caring about that stuff Sixth. I choose, finally walking my talk, that road to. Authorship. BUT! (there is always this big BUT at van den Bosch's his most annoying p.!) 221
222
Those all encompassing ways So, on to that. What exactly...? THAT AS WELL ?? (!!)
omG
See this, these... lines again, and even, spaces... lying around the page?
That is 'style', it brings home a kind of message. It is highly emotional What does it MEAN, for two..
It means, that, in Rain Weaver, stuff is explained about Consciousness & Turing Machines That is kind of, well I have not found it anywhere in 25 years. Ohhhh 223
224
Set theory again and set philosophy Ah. The serious page. Set theory & Consciousness. How do those two intersect? Do they? A set is... just a set A set with conceptual possibilities Oh, what kind of set is that? Ah set that Philosophy of Science cares about So I see this set, is that it? No, you ARE that set. All those q.fluctuation possibilities that is you.. So how does that set intersect with positives and negatives? Uhm, that is another school, that 'thought'. So, if I see a set relevant for philosophy as a set of q. fluc. What.. Take that set, now, observe with consciousness, and, viola, another set The difference between those two sets? That is,.. no not that!!! (????) That set. That actuated set, exists NOW. That other set, in the past?? NO. Ask a David or another first class Q. physicist. Oh, can I still do my math in truth approximation? (yes, but, no..!?!?!)
225
226
Great, but wait.. Oh. That last part, about truth approximation, that is in your RiD is it? Well. All that is relevant in that Oh.. field of Quantum State Set Philosophy.. (nice name, oh well, 'new', no really... NEW) In my thesis, I have this diagram. Believe Stearing
1
2
Growth
3
4
5
6
q.states 1: that what is now actual; 2: that what is needed for that/this; 3: that what can be achieved; 4: that what is now to be had 5: that what we all know is impossible, but.. (uhm, still fuzzy on that..) ! 6: outside of … (no) that/this is the REALLY great unknown... (??) !! 227
228
Steady the ship So, all nice and stuff. But. Ohhhhhhhwwwww. Sheese-cake What now. So RiD has a q.state interpretation, not worked out yet, but oh a new fie.. TM's also have a q.state interpretation. What next. Stochastic process. Oh, but wait. So a bit string/TM is/has a q.state SET coupled. Ah, so ALL computer programs ARE a q.state SET? Well... th.. N O !! A computer program is a bit string. A bit string is a q.state. Not a set o. Ah... so that square, that are ALL q.states/comp.programs in the world NO, not even in the known universe, but ALL period, not even conce.. Ah. Nice. Uhmm (looks down) Smart and all, but, coffee anyone...??! Say... has this any practical consideration to the field of Medicine, ori. NO, it is the ALL diagram, like the ALL diagrams of T.A.F. Kuipers. What is the difference. His is more.. all that research and yours in rod. That Rodopi book Cognitive Structures in Sc. Inq. is/has..NOW.. a..!! 229
230
The rimhorse The river runs. The river runs up steep. So we get to keep moving. Leave that stoving. (chorus) Be in that repertoire Stop that we are in the rain Also we get to be in more motion Steaven that all we may Try all that we must encounter Must the end now be that we are not The reason I get old, is that (chorus) So we are now on this in the get go To all we now renoun So get me in this tripence (chorus) Sleep on that will you do that I need that old guitar I see that you are nauseous (chorus) (fade out) (Tori Amos) 231
232
QFST
233
234
Table of Contents There is a real measure up there The first way to paradise is in the here and now There be no situation that is very unduelentic For the street we have a deal The rest of you can now be stricken There is that all that we go now Y The nose of that general There is no sense in striving There is also a king There is this beast in the deal There is no weather on this station Pole Come un That is the state that gets Berrilium in quantum flux is jus a kind of nolprest This way is not going in There is this station on the way There is this motion in the stream Stop or be killed Few 235
236
There is a real measure up there So to see something is to collapse that wave. Mathematically that means, to see means, sort of, that state with those tuples, that set of state with those tuple states. (Meaning that tuple < 1 4 d> is a state, but < g h l> is a tuple state. And a set of tuples is a tuple set. I recalled this format, representation from my years of modeling sem. networks in Utrecht in 1989, after a course by G. Renardel de Lavalette. In that course he explained the basis of set theory to the class. In my own time I worked out that basic concept, to a model and set model of big brain sem. networks as a model of the brain, with multi recurring sets in sets in sets. That led to an almost implemented system for finding documents, during my time at CKI.) Here is the definition, all needed for QFST, and QST as a corollary. The tuple : = < s1 s2 … sn > The element : = < a1 a2 … an > The subset : = < < s1 s2 … < a1 a2 … an > … sn > The superset : = < s1 < a1 a2 < t1 … tn > … an > s3 … < u1> … sn > The superstation : = T == T ∩ T1 The rest, as is unpresented in this real doc prover. The rain weaver := T ∩ untruth + that quirky transfer from Field T. The Sandman := The truth of state tuples is that the tuples are v. large The Show := that what the tuple space presents in consciousness, but.. The shimmering := attuning consciousness to quantum states th. are old 237
238
The first way to paradise is in the here and now So we see that we get this on our way We are very on its knee There is this state to see we get that for the rest the master is now GONE we ever need it now the all that is now down to that we get the neat is petite Y got it down I get that We stay there on the rest please pea please treason, if you Michael pull that one more time, here is your shimmer!!
239
240
There be no situation that is very unduelentic I have a new state, there it is The proof is there: We have this proven thesis. The thesis. Let there be the whole world tuple that at least contains the set of tuples that is bigger but not (yet) equal to: P ∩ Q where Q is that set of tuples that is not yet experienced by you So: We have a set of unobserved tuples, call it P We have a set of already observed tuples, call it M We have a set of steady state reasoning rules, constraint that determine the Transfer between the sem. world (yet to be def.) that is seen and the sem. world that can be seen by transfer by THAT person. We have a set of serious... ways to gain access to as much new tuple sets / sem. worlds that is this: Tr. (the transfer tuple set) Tr. := Tr. + Tr.1 + Tr.2 … + Tr.3 So, the corollary to that is: Tr. is a real tuple in the all world tuple set. !! This means, that, what to prove is that A. QST is equal in staying power by formalism and computation, or > B. QST can harbor FT and QM in formalism and, staying, but better. C. QFST is a superset of QST equations/sets that repr. fields better and D. The QFST is an qualifier for real computation of the f09870 field,.. E. The concept of TM/infinite strings are subsumed BY QFST. YES!! 241
242
For the street we have a deal Ok. There is that man There is that brother There real deal but he holds that gun The nose is there in his face The great but unknown is staying There is this kid There is that posture There is that rest The man is now in the way Please we have We go in there Reat The state is there to see The baas The best of ways (Ooooooooooooooooooooh, get that away from that theorem prover) !! 243
244
The rest of you can now be stricken There is this further proof of all that in the sun. (If you were wandering about all those single sentences, skip to the last part of this prover book and do the test. Enjoy) There is this great renown The part of me The rest of as all is now to be There is now that way There is that steady measure to be had there is no stay in this room all that is that is dead please go now to that sun tyujklopu the waq is erf hjk tru that There is that man Please trest that 245
246
There is that all that we go now So we have this all seen now There is that now there be all that is there is GOOO Be that in the scene Please Please Y Ples Oli Trespass Kjukl Y I Rt E (These weird omniscience shimmers are very astute, but also very pot.) 247
248
Y So why do we talk about Y, while we have not yet seen the on paper proof of QFST |= QST |= FT/C.QM |= Y, but.. Y is that situation where weird things happen, like a Wii remote that is let lose being 'found' partly INSIDE the plasma screen. In those cases, all on Google Pic. the q. energy is SO high that a sort of 'transfer' is possible. When playing, Wii Sports, a real quantum effect appears, you, the (tennis) player, use your arm and walk and toss and sigh, and create a huge amount of disturbance in the u9-p field, a FT tuple value that is registered in the f45 formula from the sec. set. If you solve that set with Mathematica with the values of the properties of a plasma (no lcd) TV, those are radio/skin dangerous, you find that that small layer of 'plastic' with that barium isotope gets into a wild heavy spin, such that a. plasma around it starts to be disturbed, b. that disturbance is not visible to the eye, c. when touched by Skin, real human skin (do not touch a plasma tv when on or playing active Wii) will feel it not, but gets a raw feeling and that isotope of barium gets inside your skin or nail. No harm there, seriously. Yet... When that all is set up in Mathematica properly with the defaults of Math. set to Math Lab (MATTERS) you still need to set these par. : h = 3, k = 0, k = 7, 0 = I, 7 = 5, h = 5, e = 4, u = l, p = k, k = I, n = l, p = t, f= t, o = 4, f =s, w = r, o =p, a =x, + = 0. These are the parameters that make a “duiding” (Dutch, sorry) that we see an effect that can even be filmed, but just... just the effect seen, seeing only halve of that tubular white/black Wii controller with the gyros still spinning, but stuck in a 'pool' of... The g-d thing is STUCK, halfways INSIDE the plasma screen. Happened daily, that's why Nintendo provided (free) cords. Still. Every one watches, and thinks, oh that's normal. Do you know what happens if you throw your wii controller at a plasma screen? The controller bounces, and the TV, a small scratches. But in an HIGH energy room? With People excited? It is swallowed half in a pool of jelly, seemingly. The shimmering: (out loud on white paper) : That Wii ! ! 249
250
The nose of that general I have this real There is now that beast There are very real types All that is known is that we have seed I ketchup me Treasure that Me kan dok Treat There is that value We are now so enthousiastic We are from another planet Treq Op That, that is Q from STNG Trep All that (these simmerings can be seen on a white paper, look, breath 3 x, look) 251
252
There is no sense in striving To that fine oven There is this history in that haven O high my soldier That fight is seven times nine There is this great festivity Please do Y Opulence There is that way Please Ik Reast Q Yhb Klaertis Typhoon (people, it is a chore finding and intentionating them in the shim. space) 253
254
There is also a king There is this great QFST. This field, the field that is defined by Quantum Field Set Theory is new Meaning, that field implies all phenomena from FT, and that of Q. Flux Not all Classical Quantum Mechanics is implied, because some of that is plainly wrong, both mathematically and empirically. (shown in due..) So. QFST |= FT, what of it... what is interesting to know. Some corollaries? FT |= That what we see is all that can be seen QFST |= That (Wii) Y effect and many more (all) Y effects known FT |= Being here on earth is a stay to death and no beyond QFST |= Being a consciousness is that we can intentionate shimmering (If you want to intentionate IN the shimmer space, you need this and that, what this and that is, is implied |- in QSR. No field(s) req. (proven) QFST |= part of C.QM, those parts of Schrödinger are all OUT, but.. Y? (that is 'wrong' Schrödinger is the best of all. Yes. But not impl. in QM) So.. Shimmer : There is this wrong assumption about Schrödinger, watch
255
256
There is this beast in the deal I am that arm in that station There is a very real fantasy The station in that permutation The size of it Tri For all that is was ples trespass plead hgfdsaqwertyh pla uy UIO GRADRT PLO UJ (dear reader, these letters seem random, but are preintended with intent) 257
258
There is no weather on this station These are all Permutation City (Greg Egan book) shimmerings, w.a. These walls are in the venish There is that great mensaritatorium We go there by train There is the Super Station We now have this in our head Thu re op de sa STOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOP Go to that door and drown your head dead (watch out people, leav. or..) Great sites are on this plait Terrific moon There is this menagerie Try out what you see Plaskerk Y I (if you keep seeing ME, the author, in there, that is YOU, and YOUR c.) 259
260
Pole There is this situation on the side of that road There goes the last straw Be there on that ride with R. The most of it is all on me Rest me on the knights There is now a very few ways of saying goodbye The night is still young Please put that away darling I get that with the Singulars from Bert, but (with REAL sound, took..) Oh I have that in the sheen For all that is real My fight with those all satellites (with sound, take with care.. or stop) With the kids to the Freylemaborg (my whistle group fr. th. Bijtstof) So you love R. How do YOU say that to her Treasure Treason (these simmerings are my own and appear only when your energy>215) 261
262
Come un There is this theorem. This theorem puts on the assumption that all there is to see is all those possibilities. I learned that view from T.A.F. Kuipers. He stated, very clearly, all possibilities in the world, that rectangular set and... and then I lost him completely. I tried to show my view in the colleagues bundle Cognitive Structures in Scientific Inquiry, and he responded, but not in kind. He failed to react on my fundamental change of view, already present in RiD (2001), and further filled in in So Far no Good (2017). The books I read and all my thinking on my original work in 1989 (the sem. network repres. as cont. embedded sets) 1994 (Computing Simplicity, with TM/strings as a basis for a total q.tuple, not put out in that book, but presented as a binary string) 2001 (Rationality in Discovery, with that superset with the total set of tuples as qualitative state and QM envisionments of a whole human being and much more, and the background assumption that all should go down to that long finite bin. String that is the current universe) led me after ample discussion with Atkinson (1994), van Maanen (1993), Romeyn (2001), Kooi (2005) to my own set of combined assumptions. These assumptions set me out to further investigate in my own free sometimes sick time, and when I again since 1987 took QM also into the fray, I did so feb. 2017, I just put all together: Kooi: A Universe is a set of prop. in a mult. w. tree. Proved sound. Atkinson: All we see is just that, but there is also this field that moves Romeyn: We have this rational problem, if I can solve it, a comp can. !! Kuipers: We have this set of possibilities. My reply, in 2002, no, states vdBosch: We have this superset of states. Those (q.)states are connected The groundwork is all here. I combined all these views in TM's. 263
264
That is the state that gets So now we have this all but done There is this all but great report Plead There is the room There is that OLD man There goes that woman on that horse, in red velvet with omg We need to get Rixan from the stables now Y Treasure hope The beast of it is that lion of a man There is that shit Pleas The rest is cold but hard and raw an fiend Shiver me there is this gone Pole that bastard Sick (these personal simmerings, I intent.ed them about my current state) !! 265
266
Beryllium in quantum flux is jus a kind of nolprest So, we have seen what about me and hardly any proof for that QFST Here is the big deal: We have this set of very many states There is that situation where ONE state is continuously in that state That state, that is NOT a static state. It is a Flux state, a real Q. Flux st. A Q. Flux. State is just a state that happens over and over again and ag. One such state is being in a pool, with some wrinkles I get that we are now all on the same page people? See, that Q.Flux state semantics is sooooo dense, but Memes are used These memes refer to Q.Flux situation that can be in-shimmered in T So. How many of you did already know about shimmering and T and Y I get judged for many things, but underestimate me? Get served with T I am a truth surveyor, I like it almost as much as my professor. T.K. But, when I get on to something new, completely, that is even a hard c.? … So, next book on QST/QFST, is memes, about how to Meme the Univ.
267
268
This way is not going in There is this fantastic way. Let us look at just that...
Re
Vm To Uj
R s
In this:
P0 Together
Re is Real explained phenomena Vm is veritum in explanans Uj is all Q. states that god envisioned, the total state constr. tuple, QM Rs is the Real Observable World that is satisfied under the laws of CM P0 is the possible way we get this in the real world 269
270
There is this station on the way In permutation is this view a adjustment that gives us just that what we need from this. This means, that, while we see that we have a goal on this, we also get a sense of real duty. Best the rest or be contest, is what there is written on that. Further more... That whole business in QFT is just that the whole theory is just those constraints that constraint the whole tuple domain. Those var.'s from the FT tuples are all basic and part of QM and partly of Q.Flux theory. My precise point is this. The constraint set, constraints such as demonstrated in RiD, are just the formulas in FT and QM. They provide and compute to the same var. data. An envisionment in QDE, I did that with slices of the time frame in the GABA system and the Basal Ganglia, are EXACT ways that translate to both Q.Flux and FT and … QFST. The difference? Try to proof that yourself. I did that. That follows in the book: “Going Outside” (2017). So. FT done. QM taken care of. Q.Flux uhm.. solved Y and PROVED Y. GFT (Einstein) a part of NOT FT, NOT QM, a bit Q.Flux, but not QST Is general field theory validated by QFST? … Yes. But... Some (1/5) nt.
271
272
There is this motion in the stream In my way of helping society getting smarter and bigger, I am going to write my next Q book on Going Outside, meaning, Transfer and Motion. Here is a small part in shimmerings intended. Me working on it. There is the Q We get there in the way Stop being that ass A D. in the parcours running for our gold That is not this manner Stop being so rude Where IS THAT he We are now on to this Go on and stop That is there do we get All that is is room More on the till Stop being such a real dork, instead of that, HELP
273
274
Stop or be killed People, I am working my ass of around the clock. I am now taking a few timeframes of the Q.state field off. My next book is coming. A song in conclusion. You can hear the music if you shimmer and your energy is above 400. Thanks
275
276
Few (50 cent) Jammy he is no friend of mine Let me tell you something of his side of this He is no friend but he is a butcher No friend of mine will ever let that happen Great the cops are on this again, I better run again Wow they caught one, but again its not me Will you tell me what I will do with this gun No just let me go and shoot yourself A friend of mine got shot today It wasn't me I shot the killer Let me know that I am alright Give me credit, leave me be Now I want to know the real deal Give this gun of mine a change If you are not against me, are you a friend No get away or I'll start shooting again This gun is my best friend in the world It has a friend, yes I got more Now let me be, and shoot my gun off Oh my god, the cops again...
277
... 278
Strangeness in QFT
279
280
Table of Contents There is this proof for QFT QFT subsumes QFST I have a strange question What about the string of consciousness There is no real continuous field down the time line The best way to get a bonus in QFT is through FT and Q.Flux and back again to QFST There is this field, a matrix, that fills out the experiential field How about that in games like WoW and Doom We are a serious business that explains and combines all There is that strange phenomenon suddenly explained That Y field is no vortex but a matrix in consc. That is/seems too obvious What has been said before The take from interdisciplinary study for a life time Einstein subsumed (GFT) by QFT, proved The last resort is always the way back or out Sudden applications Further problems
281
282
There is this proof for QFT I have a set. This set is a tuple. That tuple contains a huge amount of var.'s that on its turn describe aspects from (quantum) reality, as measured and used in Collider experiments and a hand full of theoretical terms. All the domain of particle physics and the hunt for the Quark. All off them. What they turn out to be, is all the domain of those experimental and physical fields. My field is concepts and theory combination and comparison. In that way an interesting combination that is not internally conflicting may constitute to something original theoretically. I did so in my PhD research. I wrote a small hardcover book on QFST, that aimed to show that Q.Flux and FT and only part of Q.Mech (I called it Clas.Quant. Mech) can be united in one setting, one conceptual frame, one theory, one way to look at what those tuple var.'s may mean in a grander whole, regardless of the emp. and theoretical successes. I stepped up, recalling conceptual semantic network research I did privately in 1989, and my 1994 investigation in Kolmogorov Complexity, P. Vitanyi style. In this winter all fell together, I studied physics and q.phys from many a book since 1989 as well. Here goes. The QFST green/gold book was my crown book on QFST. This book is the all-ball book, tying in some 22 books that I wrote about this subject, unifying quantum mech. in one coherent frame work, with problems partly gone, and new possibilities that can be measured and experienced. It was a ride, some of these 22 books in the back are just the corollaries, my main interest is medicine, as it was from 1993. So here goes...
283
284
QFT subsumes QFST QFST is a theory as defined by me in the green/gold book QFST. Take that as a given. What is Quantum Field Theory. We already have Field Theory, that is actually a parameter setting of C.QM. In Quant.Field. Theory that is wholesome different. QFT : = < QFST, a string (infinite TM) > So, what does that mean. Well, my book Comp. Simplicity taught me one thing more than everything, random strings are by definition BIGGER than the known (finite) universe time included (cf. p. Vitanyi). So? An infinite string, like Pi, or Au, or any like, the string that describes your all consciousness states over time IN the finite universe, is...? If it where finite, than within the universe it would NOT be stochastic, meaning... predictable by a decent Cray. It is proved on the Q.level that it is NOT. That string can be seen as the upward scale of every choice that you your consciousness makes over the whole time of your life. Every 1, look left (e.g.) that 0, look DOWN, and ow, 17397 means, eating cheese, but.. the examples show... when you die, what does that further infinite string denote? Is it the choices you make in 'heaven'. That seems extremely unlikely. More likely is that your consciousness goes to some kind of end state, bu we do not KNOW that, but the string the consciousness needs to be stochastic hence INFINITE. That string, well what can we say, no QFST states any more, or all on 0 ? The string still... what makes that that string keeps being 'read', what gives? All research questions for the new field of QFT/QFST. Going to QFT. Is this new. Try finding One Journal or book, on Google Scholar or Google Books, maybe a bit in stuff that was written after some people talked to me or got my books to read. This is my challenge. This Field!! 285
286
I have a strange question I am at this road. That road is very long. It goes to that city.. STOP IT.. this is a very C.QM question, made famous by the seminal book Permutation City by Greg Egan. It is very informative about Q. strangeness. But, what does it predict about you and me? I walk this road, so, that road is endless... I walk on and on. Oh. I Die. From thirst or old age. Oh. Where am I now? The molecules lie around aimlessly. Sad affair. Bit to much reality. But. Take that other view. Consciousness first. That consciousness experiences dying as a process, ending in a kind of Østate. But...
287
288
What about the string of consciousness So, that QFT, that field state tuple with all those var.'s and that string, literally, that connects one state after another. The var's in that field tuple are/can be continuous. But what is time, then. When does ONE state slice go over in that next one, what happens in between? Segmentation faults anyone? Deja vu's? No... It is a kind of huge sausage, if that tuple field that huge set of var's per second, say, no per... if that is also continuous, than over time... that is a big long oval like... continuation. The main string is that stochastic consciousness string, that representation of consciousness, all those tuple var.'s are. The phenomenon itself is just, it IS, it is represented micro specs from it by that tuple, that field representation. So between two slices is just another whole world that can be represented. And when we do a nice comp. Simulation, from slice one to two, in that space, stuff 'can' happen that kills the whole field to DOWN, in a femto second. That is not a problem of the QM/FT constraints but also not the resolution but...more in my next book “The Way to Horus”. So... Anybody has any sense now? We are a phenomenon. That is, we are conscious about a huge world that can be represented per slice with I believe up to 243 par.'s in FT and 554 par.s in C.QM. In Flux theory that is up to 9907 parameters if you take in all those flux possibilities and grind them all to possible states for the next slice(s). The phenomenon, Consciousness is NOT taken into account in all off them. We all know Schrödinger said, observation collapses that wave of those 7 tuple values to this and/and that, or death. But. Observation is consciousness making a 'decision'. The consc. of that black cat coll. also. 289
290
There is no real cont. field down the time line See, that follows. But there IS. The quantum field IS continuous. Off course it is. The representations make to SEEM it not being not continuous. But it HAS to be. Is it a grid with 'white' slices inbetween? Think about that. Is glides, all par.'s and those par.'s can be computed with any of the many many Q field/constraint parameters. And if you do that on a Cray, sometimes one BRACH can kill the hell out of you, because of one erroneous assumption. “Nothing happens between the slices”. That is quatch, but got stuck in there, and Cray knows it. But do they have that solution? Smart people over there. They make the $$ with biochem and nobody dies from their sims. Anyway. Down the time line... what is it? Is it a Klein-bottle? Is it... more in my next book “Timeness”
291
292
The best way to get a bonus in QFT is through FT and Q.Flux and back again to QFST Here goes. I need a bonus in QFST. That means, for me, that I want a phenomenon that QFST allows but the rest not. What happens: C.QM: A lot can happen, all that we see basically, but stuff also that..?? FT: As a C.QM aff. It predicts all of C.QM bu with some diff par.. omg? Q.Flux: So that is nice we have these pheno... OMG. Did that happen?? QFST: That above, minus some C.QM, but PLUS all consc. effects... !! What? The whole POINT of seeing consciousness as a long stochastic string that connects the possible state tuple tree, in such a way that that string, consc., ONLY passes the possible tuple field 'worlds (in old logic terms)' the whole point to that is, that what consc. actually observes is/are those fields/tuples/par's/Flux states, and well... that consciousness some how collapses the var.'s in those tuples in those multiple world states/tuples. Or... Or. When consciousness passes that particular state, that, that field state, means, well... the one influences the other, or the other way around? Is my consc. big/strong/powerful/flux enough to by being aware, decide that apple is green that is red, that cat is alive, that one dead, just by looking? Well, another FINE point for both theoretical and exp. Work in this fld. 293
294
There is this field, a matrix, that fills out the experiential field I have this going in. A next way to do so. I say, stop. What does that mean. That is.... In C.QM, that is a situation that needs a 'par' or a state influencer that collapses that part. State. My claim, I made it before in The Real Deal, in this way even a pill is a collapser of that whole state. But, that is... Is that valid in C.QM or Q.Flux? In QFT it is. In QFST it is NOT. How... to be discussed. In my upcoming next work on medicine and QST, “The World as I Found it”, a ref. To Duffy. What a lot of references to work to be done. People, this field, QFT/QFST is NEW, and these are all branches. I work round the clock to set out the branches, and wait out the month for my invitations to the numerous professionals to partake. So. Medicine. That is going to be my special interest. The others, interact. I do the philosophy and the globe-wide theory, on the side, as a commentator. On Medicine, I hope to attract one field leader with half a day p. week.
295
296
How about that in games like WoW and Doom In World of Warcraft, so many things about individuality and getting an arrow in the head is being done RIGHT, that both run on big work stations. Doom runs on the Cray for pass time, but is eerily accurate in determining stuff, it got hacked/amended. More on games later on. One of my branches in understanding Story in culture and film, and my partaking in writing for movie and extended historic TV series (“Romans”). A hobby, with a sharp serious edge.
297
298
We are a serious business that explains and combines all That is right. I started an under construction Firm, called Nell co. after Jody Foster growing up without culture in the wild. That co. aims to provide very accurate market advantaged Cray Sims for biochem and more, for med. The tools Visualization and Industry, with baked in recent insights in better FT/Q/Flux/QFST/QFT constraints and template par. fields for e.g. receptor folding (D3), clinging, and Cleft phenomena. That co. is going to start after the summer. It's current focus, a new take on Stege based on QFST and one revised constraint/equation with a Q.flux variant. Based on first principles. http://nell.vision
299
300
There is that strange phenomenon suddenly explained There are many, in QFST: I can now understand that suddenly people die on that C.QM on Cray I have that horse. It runs away. Why? In QFST that is expl. by. Hid. I see that rabbit in that Cray DW 1.03 sim. It is GONE? Expl. ihsat. There are a few in QST: I now see that top hat (?) on the Cray in Q.Flux. Gone. Look UP!! (no) I get to see the mayor in that Story Town. NOOOO. Pl., stay always in I need that wagon repaired. I told you... In QST telling is 'dirty' kills. !! I have another need. .. !! .. What is the need of that character? Attempt I have those real people looking at my sim char. No. STOP. Go OUT !! I need that gas. No, stop and walk. Try. And do not.... OOOOH (dead) I see this in my mirror, what... GRUNT. Do not look. It is your.. (sigh) I can go on... I have a list of 25 more and counting form first principles. This seems 'funny'/'harmless', but these sim situations also determine predictions for med. Uptake. They need to work perfect or stay OUT.
301
302
That Y field is no vortex but a matrix in consc. OK. Have you seen the shimmer for the first time? An you recall when? That is an OLD phenomenon, intentionating with high thingy in the YTuple sphere/space/matrix. First: A. It is not Old, it is disovered in Western Society in India in 1810. B. It is not the Matrix, it is the mysterious Y.space from Q.Flux, nt. QM C. It can be highly attuned, the Germans did so horribly D. It can also be erased, a lot of the camp horrors are gone, testimonials E. I have seen enough of it, starting with the red wire frame. F. I use it in a commercial interest, I make and sell Shimmer books, so. G. More can be gained, you can use it for Med. Explore a body within. H. That last one is faaaaaar away on the research scale. I. It is eery but you need to take head, and NOT over do it. Psychosis. As an entrepreneur I heard from it and made my books, 5 or so, but I am done for now. They are: “No Good so Far”, “Meme”, “Israel”, “The Whole Deal”, and “Dutch”. I will not let this side track get me side tracked further from the serious field work for QST/QFST. 303
304
That is/seems too obvious All seems so obvious. People, I told a LOT of people what my new ideas are, but all are, without exception, oh, but a. that is simple, b. I can understand, c. you must have heard that from T. Kuipers or an. prof. Here goes, again. This, google scholar/books checkable was not in the Google data sphere before I started to put it all together and publish it first in feb. 2017. I shed out some books, and all I got was, mostly.. uhm. Why... and silence. Meaning? Meaning, I started up a new field with a huge amount of applications. I published 22 books about it, writing on and on, inspiration after inspiration from just putting together TWO things. The Kolmogorov work in Comp. Simpl. The TM stuff, with years of study on consc. plus studying states and transfer in the BRAIN under Wia Timmerman, putting it in constraint functions, building the rest up in SETS. Have you seen how many cases I worked out just in SETS, and imagine for every set a whole Constraint situation, and the Envisionment, the possible worlds, and the theorem prover, it looks so simple, but it is all there. What changed? In QSIM a state is a simple tuple, in Q.Flux/FT is is a huge tuple, the semantics for the environment is the SAME. One in our group started working out the semantics on that right away for a logic journal, but that was water under the bridge. That person just did not know, or had forgotten about RiD. The results on the book are huge if you work out the corollaries. But in Qualitative states for a simple structure that is already HUGE. And searching that huge poss. Tree is even bigger a work for a pc. On a CRAY.... and doing a set / tuple interpret. With attuned constraints, that becomes BIG science instead of joyful theorem proving. I am going there, I am being there. So. New: 1. The TM that generates a string that predicts all must also be stochastic 2. If the tuple state on a Cray is NOT satisfied under C, that state is gone 3. If that state is gone, where is the consc. string in the tuple?????????? 4. Solution, the consc. observes the/that state. If state is gone.. next state! 5. So, phil. what is the string that is consc.? That is YOU, but..no body!! 305
306
What has been said before Oh. Cons. is just an phenomenon of that phys. Proc. Oh. Consc. is epiphen. That is a nice word, don't you think.. No. Cons. is already expl. by Daniel Dennet, do you know him? No/Yes. Where is that part. Cons. effect In the research field experimentally Ah. If what you say is this and that and my work is better because... Read my “The 300 Reasons”. My reply is Oh. (no) Say, let share this with that other view that is muddy but longer around … I get that you do not understand TM's Turing did not even do so I learned from Li & Vitanyi
307
308
The take from interdisciplinary study for a life time I studied stuff from year 8, and combined all, always. These where my training camps. Technische Bedrijfskunde: MBA with Elec. And Material Science and.. Cogn. Kunst. Intell. (CKI): OMG all cognit. science and MUCH more.. Wijsbegeerte: All of Phil. Of Science and Social Phil. Of Science and... BCN: A 5 year programme in Neuroscience and neuropharmacology + Letting go from books for years and let my trained brain do the stuff.. Finally, I went to be an independent. All the problems. Yours. Solve. Pl.
309
310
Einstein subsumed (GFT) by QFT, proved OK. believe it, but this is a corollary. GFT |= FT QST |= QFST |= FT So, how about, what is true? Is QST |= GFT a true statement? Ah.. no. Tried that one. Time bending? Is... QFST |= GFT a true statement? Ah... actually. Yes. Prove it as exerc. You know why it is true? You need the green/gold book QFST to get the other theorems. In this book it really is just a corollary. There is more. See my upcoming book: “Time to Seep”.
311
312
The last resort is always the way back or out In this …. wait. I quit. I need time for the other books. My brain works overtime now. Here is what this book was about: QM, is now Classical QM (C.QM) QFST |= GFT |= FT There is a string that is stochastic (NOT RANDOM) that repr. your soul Your soul/consciousness needs further study in THIS field I found out after 30 years of combining that these results form a field I operate that field I invite others to join form end Feb. 2017. Thank You. Alexander P. M. van den Bosch (PhD)
313
314
Sudden applications Clowns that live (Cray q.sims) Pills as collapsers That Stege undone in better emulsions The Clinging better understood The receptor understood with new drug this/that ...
315
316
Further problems I have found no way to explain that effect 675 in Cray DW 1.03 I have a problem with sudden death in apples I now know that the crow is not dead but GONE, but WHERE More... In the next book “Quantum State Theory”
317
318
Quantum State Theory
319
320
Table of Contents I see that perspective in the distance That star is too far too measure its light without bending effects That starlight is now here Now what QST vs. QFST The proof that QST is sound The proof that QFST is implied by that sound QST The real differences between the two There are different implications for industry There are widely diff. Ways of testing both theories Again, T. what is a proper theory I like to be daring I say QSR implies GFT and the theory of special...relativity So I said it. Here is the proof. Chew on it, math. So since that is out to easy, we take on med. Science Stege is not gonna be here to stay on MY watch
321
322
I see that perspective in the distance I have a division of sorts in my head. I need to delineate space with a tuple quadrant that fits the constraints of a very complex set of grammar rules, or, more traditionally functions, algebraic functions. These functions, numbered in Classical Quantum Mechanics as f1 to f234, or sometimes f45, as a quick name to the whole set. These have a specific domain and a way of being projected back to that domain, without the problems of time dilatation and sorts. In this set out book of QST we start with the basics from C.QM, but not all has/can fit in. Not all of that predicts correctly, this is assumed to be due to a few functions from f45, but we will see that it is more of a representation problem. So... We have in QST a set with parameters, these par.'s state the whole universe tuple, up to all and including all from C.QM. That are in total 137 objects, varying from just a bit to a range from 0 to inf. Or a letter range for a set scale, or, get this just up, dow, or through. (the last one only in certain parts of Field Theory, a seeming subset of C.QM) So. We have that set, delineated as an ordered set and presented without all those , comma's, so set : = < 6 f 3 x> That is the basis. That is the Domain that the constrainst/functions need to inlarge, meaning determine per par what the value(s) are per par. For a part. State or Time slice (more on time later). And last, we have the Set (S) the state (also an S, that confounds, so an S stands for a State, but a state in QST is ALWAYS again a set. Ah. 323
324
That star is too far too measure its light without bending effects Oh, we are as ambitious as C.QM, if you have the guts to tell the world that C.QM can be improved upon, you better not just tell that one fuzzy experiment got IN yours and not in the old master's work. You need a paradigm shift that takes the whole boat, and the bride, so to speak. A new core but predict at least what was predictable. In QST that is almost all C.QM, to be shown, and most parts of that variable FT and Q.Flux, but what about General Field Theory. So. GFT : = a set of parameters that is set by... by what? In QM it is done by observation and flux and automation and redundancy and entropy and much more. In GFT that is... in special Relativity is it gravity? NO! It is the force but the unexplained, undeducable one. So again... just thinking clear and visualizing like other scientist can do also well... That gravity well, that has a bottom, is there a point down stairs? What is the function that describes, determines how deep the gravity well is? Well, that function is known, and it is one of the functions in FT, it is function f45 (not the set, just in FT, a single formula). So if THAT is already in FT, what else of SR need to be in QM/FT/Q.flux... otherwise why bother with QST... don't you agree? In Special relativity... we have … do we have the special forces? Do we,... is there... wait. GFT |= SR, so we might just as well focus completely on GFT. Find a theory that, say QST |= GFT/Q/Flux.. etc What makes QST so special. Is it just one big tuple/set with the par's of all the others and all the constraint functions, but NOT those that cause the very severe problems of C.QM and most of those in Q.Flux, and oooh just throw in the GFT var.'s and THEIR constraints and...uhm some par/vars line up...nicely, and hardly any new need to be introduced. Almost all constraints survive.. what gives...???? Is it that simple. Yes.
325
326
That starlight is now here In the seventies the Cray Company already employed a bright young man. He made the plans for the sim rooms, and he did a nice hand of QM and FT. He made some algorithms that still contain var's and par's not in most academic work in QM. That worked out in industry and hilarity. I wrote about that extensively. But. What is not known is what constraints should be adapted, and what should be cut out. Well, I thought of the representation to see it all clear in ONE heap, just a set of var's and a possible world tree upon it that … the tree determines what states are accessible from that state to the next. There is a lot more work to do, but what this anonymous boy did, I believe he perished in the 80's, he made some cuts in the constraint functions based on very clear insights and... the results that generator of a BIG cray monster produced when he wanted to sim a horse or a pond. It was/is experimental science. Cut out: f1 (yes, completely, in its place, just Ø) f34 (completely, it muffles the lense in all the possible states, no return) f67 (ouch, this is years of work by that German prof. Dec. still OUT) f90 (look at it, think about a horse and than this thing, no legs...) f30 (Uhm, at Cray they did NOT need an explanation) f5 (for the sake of serendipity, another f was made but cut, water probl.) f957 (this outside function sometimes in, NEVER IN AGAIN) f69 (oh, this must hurt, but in the sims, this is against the grain work) f70 (just tiny, but always harmful in life/death sim) In: f305 from the outside set, and KEEP it in 327
328
Now what If you do a sim in mathematica with THESE new constraints, wonder.
329
330
QST vs. QFST How does QST imply QFST and do we still need either. Well, try to integrate Einsteins GFT without the Set Theory construct. I dare you. Please publish in Nature. Quant. FIELD Set/State Theory is about the fields from FT, a whole area So. QST |= QFST proof. Say it did not follow, than there is one constraint or one par outside the main set from QST. There is not. Q.E.D. (there is more to it if GFT is included)
331
332
The proof that QST is sound A theory is sound if it produces the same predictions after any and all diff... It is sound. Use your head. Visualize the set. There is a set of par's and a set of constraints on that whole set. If the par's and the constraints do not change, the predictions do not as well.
333
334
The proof that QFST is implied by that sound QST QST |= QFST If QST was false, QFST would be false as well. Period.
335
336
The real differences between the two The diff. Between C.QM and QST is, the former uses algebra, this one uses Set theory that T.K. Build his career on in bettering it for all situations. The current set up already covers QM (most) FT Q.Flux and well Y... but the work of T.K. Also must include sociology, drama, psychology, geology, situation semantics (in the works) So don't bow down on a simple very powerful formalism.
337
338
There are different implications for industry Yes. Do they use different par's and different var's? This QST is now a research field. Its aim (one of them) Identify all correct functions/constraints on the set and... wait That sounds like what C.QM already does. Does the tuple space of those initiatives already also include ALL par's and var's from GFT? And ALL the constraints on that? How about U-U in that same set.... This is a UNIFIER. And it is a research programme, in unification.
339
340
There are widely diff. Ways of testing both theories Yes. Do all.
341
342
Again, T. what is a proper theory A theoretical core A domain of natural phenomena to be explained Some already explained Theoretical terms in the theory, not just description and generalization More...
343
344
I like to be daring Join, or wait for the core team to be formed that sets out the first main problems to tackle from the univ. stand point. So. Wait.
345
346
I say QSR implies GFT and the theory of special...relativity A nice prove, but....QSR? Wha....?
347
348
So I said it. Here is the proof. Chew on it, math. The big proofs still need to be written OUT. That is what the team is for. I asked mathematical professors: T. Kuipers D. Atkinson G. Renardel de Lavalette B.P. Kooi J. W. Romeyn H.A.N. van Maanen Finally asked: P. Vitanyi.
349
350
So since that is out to easy, we take on med. Science Yes. Because a correct QM /QST is a basis for viz simulation and state interpretation in biomed research for drugs and whatnot. Worldwide.
351
352
Stege is not gonna be here to stay on MY watch Well, I found out hard why Stege is not going anywhere, so I am taking my measures, differently. (private) See my too revealing book-let “Stege” 2017.
353
354
The Quantum Space Realigned
355
356
Table of Contents The State Space The Real State Space The All State Space The Best Way Forward The Nuisance in FT The Best Great Waste That Beast in Your Belly There is No Gratitude The No Way Save House All that is To Be Had There is No Great Escape There is that Beast Again There is thus this way Forward This has not been done before Save that way will you There is that way to be had 357
358
The State Space There is this state space. This space is so that T : So: 1 : that state of that space at time-frame 1 a : all that we have seen is this belly of q-state worlds s : the whole stuff of this is now a state (singular) w : will this be the end. this w is the possible world state on t-f 1. 3 : the measure of ways that the parity of the first tuple par. falls up r : ready. this par. is that what we are looking at t : time-stamp/frame, where we all see the same p. at that time stamp y : this special par. sets up that what is now seen on that screen o : be that. this part of the whole scene is just that. a part that is whole p : that what we see is now a dream k : there is that way we are now dead, see that in So Far no Good t : there is that that we all see r : we have this situation that we all must address d : we have seen this but that is not all s : we have now seen this but all is not that is seen w : we have now that serious way of looking in a : there is that one thing z : there is that twofold x : we have this scale of consciousnesses v : for this par. we go outside d : there is no greater
359
360
The Real State Space There is this state space. T. That space is so that: T : This whole tuple, run in Dream Weaver on the Cray work station in Chicago will show you a universe that is whole and sound and implies most of, if not all of QED. This wholesome tuple is what makes that theory QST a whole sound and proper theory. This theory implies, just this. There is this place We need that way I have this idea We need the grain There is that maiden There is that way again. There is this stool. We are now that golden 361
362
The All State Space There is this all state space. There is that way we go to the moon. We need that way to move. Here is that way. So: T :
So we have seen this all. We are now on this track... We are now going to that town. There is this way of the dear. We have that under control See that. We all go to that place That we see this night. There is this night. We see that night-whole
We also see that beast We go to that pal. 363
364
This Book is a state space realigner OK. When you know that this whole universe is big computer. That computer matrix is a 3D/4D screen to your soul/consciousness. That whole screen (the world and its PAST) can be viewed by/with your own eyes. But. There is a 'back door' to that 'past' window of the state space. Sit on a bench/stool, on a table with a white A4/Legal/Letter Look at that white paper for 15 minutes with slow breathing in/out Now, just as in the last few pages, read out loud (not think) that meme Close your eyes Wait for 15 sec. (wait for it, wait for it, do you see flakes in your..!!) Now Look (clear) to the paper, at the centre, don't stare, let the images.. When the images from your Quantum State Collapser come (consc.) If that happens... let it flow to all sides (do this at least once) !!!!! Do not DO NOT repeat that meme..!! Look at that page... what happens in the whole white?? Moving? Or? Oh, do not worry. It is an experience, but.. stop after THREE memes People. These/Those MEMES/SENTENCES are state space keys. Go.. 365
366
The Best Way Forward I get that on the beer train See I have this news for you I get there but I must go There is this night owl There is this great menagerie There is this whole insight There is this stupid thing Where are my keys Night owl is just a dead thing There is that night owl again So we have been in that Be that we may There is the Jezus I see that man on the cross (yes, look, look around... see the soldiers?) I have that being There is this all thing
367
368
The Nuisance in FT Ok. People. This book? An intentionation book on QST & FT/QM We are there Look at this screen People are there to be seen to I have this great way of being There is this on the gong I get that on the waste line There is no return The way to the guillotine I save that for the gallows There is that menagerie There is that fortitude See that we got All that we have Now I have I have seen this in all in great stuff We need to stop now. 369
370
The Best Great Waste I have that all we see in the rest room We have that way we get there in the room There is this way I get that in the best way I get that in this way Yes I say that We say that we have been that beaty There is that space again We get that in the best There is this in the train We get that in the rain There is that beaty We now have that solved, sir..!! There is this beaty There is that beast again So, any luck getting OUT..!!
371
372
That Beast in Your Belly I have now seen this way There is that all we get There is thus this situation yes There is that on the till We need that food We also need that food There is that we need We also get that on the till We need that All we have is that bread All we got is that food, wholesome So in all we say stay a day, or two OK. I have Say that again, or I.. I get that in the well Say that again in that well
373
374
There is No Gratitude I see we now have this seed to give To that I say, we also need I get that in the waste line I need that what we have There is that we got We have now this leary We are not that man The rest is CLEAN There is that situation in this scale There is that whole that is now DEAD There is that what is beaten Pole See that in the mirror There is that in the night I get that I get that in the vase
375
376
The No Way Save House The No Way Save House is Now a save place, forever (wtf.. people..!!) I have seen this in my case I need that seen in record There is this in the need We also need is all who that get but now dead oh grace stuff (ouch) We beat that on the stallion We also get that in the rain We also need that beaten We also beat that what is now steady We are not all that weaven Be that we are We are So we go I have that tit There is that tit I see that on this.. BEATEN
377
378
All that is To Be Had I have so much shave to create To that I have now that retort I need that taken care for We see that we have that beaten in We are this beaten steady house There is such that we get that in the house O That is that bull-shitty Say that to Nicki Nicki and I on that horse again in a meadow in Greece (people.. !!) Say that I have this situation Say that we get that union We are in that state There is this way We get that in the state We are now almost DEAD again... Oh, no, not AGAIN.. (yes)
379
380
There is No Great Escape We shall have this situation. There is that new night stand There is this There is this great sensation There is this great property There is this great menagerie There is this that tho thu stu (Stanford people, please stop that n-sense) There is that way we have We have that seen on the till We are that we are The one thing that is new is that great There is that great way There is that way we see There We see that way There is that sneed
381
382
There is that Beast Again A giant ALARM is going off There is that way The warm stay up that street There is that stay I have that way I get that on the way The rest The rest is that always The rest is now great One there is this pleasure Stuff that is now great There is that one thing There is that two thing Being There is that real There is this way
383
384
There is thus this way Forward There is this way we get this on the till We need that way There is no greater way to be on the till There is this way There is that what There is that way we get that We oppulance that suave girl with that braid (chantal... 920) We get that in this situation There is that we get in the stave There I have this on my machine I have this in the guard There is that in the wave Get that We are now that beast-y We all see that we see
385
386
This has not been done before I do not get that GOD-DAMMIT, LEAVE TH. WHOLE PLACE NOW Trickery There is what that is all to be in this great suave stay in that real ow that Ther We got that in the ready room We are NOW IN THAT BOAT ON THAT GREAT RIVER DOWN ST. We have there in this city We are now in that way We get that in this situation We get there in this all Rest There is that OMG GOOOOOOO NOOOOOOOOOOOOOW !!!!!! (?) I have seen this in this line There is so much more to see There Is that way we go... !!!!!!!!!!!! !!! !!!!!! ! ! !!!! !!!!!! !!! !!!!! ! 387
388
Save that way will you I have also seen this great all that is mine My gold is there on the till There is that that we get We Have There is so much way to There is that way Stay Those that we get that we are now be that girl that is not that free Great that way There is that way There are now that gay straights There is there no way The stuff that is now Jan-Willem has got his proof of QST ready for me There is that way
389
390
There is that way to be had I have now that way to stay I get that now There is that way we are today There is that way no way we stay We are there in that steady We get that in the best of ways Lulu is now a enlightened company of 650-850 (wha.. you read the..?) There is now that way We are here to get that all We get that in the same astute We also need the best of it Lulu gets all the books for ever and ever from me (true that.. !!) There is this in the way to stay We are now that man in that bag That man form lulu, Paul, he is now a 920 like chantal bec.. (see, paul..) There is there We have now this fight (omg omg omg OMG OMG, is this true lulu)
391
392
The river runs dry (Q.sim Storyboarding on the Cray)
393
394
Contents The way to the river Topology Going straight on that bend The guys that paddle most So I have this way to get not wet She was there faster, anyway She had a old car - break The realest way to staying Back inside that boat We are here for nigh All that is seen in the boat is Y See that in the shimmering Stay up in those candles Let me in this lost end (The end is just the beginning) 395
396
The way to the river I walk on to that plain I see that man on the brink There is just that We shake hands He draws a gun He tawns to it There is that machine in the corner Please do not put my hand in that There is that loud bang There is that thankyou There is these gangs That is not the way I planned To the troposphere So we now got that down There is that We now go down that hill (these scenes are the first part of a Real Story, “Story” 2017 style) 397
398
Topology There is this on the cornucopia That is just lame I saved her from death from the hand machine The hand machine is shown briefly (imp. Incl. for remembrance) There is this stay We get this on the till We also need that on the stay We need there is that way Go out and have that stay There is that growth Till we meet that is the case Stay but may we see Oh we have such all included show all but the inspr. (VERBATIM, or else...) So we get there in that trim We be there but not always (So in this part of the whole story we meet that guy, look... right) 399
400
Going straight on that bend So we have this all on sun To that we say goodday I will also love you to There is that show to tell There is no grand final There is that all we see We see just all that is All that is is also Y So we need an extra splain (verbatim please: splain) So we have this all All we need is tea That is not my case There is now that bill So we have this case All that is is stru There is that we have & So we get a marriage (So in this Storyboard story we get a glimpse of... the couple and..) 401
402
The guys that paddle most I have seen that way in the mirror All that is just to great I have not that bussy The rest is so that I may There is so a nuisance There is that we see I get it from the telly I get in the telly free Now I am in the TV There is no more room The President is smiling (to another, why... look, turn) There is that very look We get it now, we do So all we do is stalking No that is not what I say There is this way of mocking (here in the story I get that we have this reason to breath) 403
404
So I have this way to get not wet I make that rest There is that So I have I know it on the till There is that way Know this I know that There is this situation There is I get I must I know To be Op Let get & To (We have now a reason to be in this situation, important for stories) 405
406
She was there faster, anyway I have a waver full of harvest That till is nearly full That reign is now a total show the president show the girl who is the boss (look at the hands, which goes sl. Up?) There is such a way that masters the way We got that on the till We also read the mister Y Oh that is the blue city of Greg Egan again Who put that in the Cray Oh that was already in there No it was just a city of sorts There is that nice brown girl I call her (privat, choose your own name, not Nicki) (There is that, wanderer, who is that, omg BEAUTY incarnate) 407
408
The The stay The long stay home The rest The rest of the Universe Here is what we need Where is that what we need Pole that in the kitchen Now we have that ready On the till with thee Oh I have a kitchen So much all for love So we have this station There we go on we Please I have this There is this man (There is this H. Richards, involved in Cray DW 1.03, he is this man) 409
410
She had a old car A old car she had All she had was that There is those of you that can For we are this fortune Lest we are but true Y Please Y-U There is there Oh we have that only We get that on the stave We need now a staven To that is ok Let all be there on There is just that be please (we see in this storyboard scene that what a kitchen looks like, but..) 411
412
- break I have this token beacon There is just this Scale In this scale 1000 We all are just pale We need now to stivven To the rest is gone I but get there but weaven I must now be gone There is just this ret To that all we get Shave So we now see nipples (true) That is not that jest See we do these nipples All we get is that Oh (this is lewd people, it is a love story board, so some fornication) 413
414
The realest way to staying I get away this evening I need just that sad All I want is treasure I need that oh Ted There is just a crushing Of this all we get To that we say bonden All we say is said There is now this gaiten I got there in the pret There is now that getten There is now that fat Free me now to heaven Pole To that So (oh, what did I do, this got out of hand... kiddin') 415
416
Back inside that boat Oh I have this boat ready For all I have this way There is that now we have that True To the sad understating Clear that beating on the chimney Say we all that stay Please There is so much pleasure True Oh More about sex please (an education in words follows) There is that vicious man Oh I get that There is that So (I mean, what do you get when you program a Cray super comp.? Fun) 417
418
We are here for nigh Where is the real way to the deal There is so much that is Getten Rules Meat so I have but getting to that maid There is that man Oh Oh Quiet That is so meaningless There is that pasture So we get that stoop Oh we are but wonder So, we all but stoop Sell all things from the kitchen Tell it to your boss I need to have a label & I need a fork in hell (that is the middle part of this real “story” story, going on...) 419
420
All that is seen in the boat is Y I see that now I look around sharply Y There is that blue The table is normal, not upside down Now we go for fortune We see the girl advance That is Nicki isn't Oh. That is quiet a surprise We know we have a friend somewhere We got that all in view All is sad but beaten There is always just release Release. OH (in this story release is a past mid point as well, original) 421
422
See that in the shimmering There is the shimmering That needs a white board first We breath for 15 minutes We see the table white We speak all these weird intention meme keys That is not the case Oh I see a Nicki on a horse with the author (really...) Oh that is that publisher LuLu So that is how Mick Jagger looks like red Stay in that bed my kids The story just continues Here it goes in Shimmering There is the King & He is dead There is the Nicki & She is red There is the author & he is not so sad OH 423
424
Stay up in those candles There is that grand evolvement the management is just these three I have this on the table I get this in that till There is no verticious So am I just a bible There is that I must be gotten I get that all the time There is just that station There is now that pain The There it IS OMG WoW That is NOT so nice Wow again (in this twist point of the story on the Cray viz. We see and hear .. Y.) 425
426
Let me in this lost end I have now this business There is this way to hell We all got that on the beast Man I got a pepsi I got a Coke as well Hey is this the com. break ('com. break' Verbatim) So do we all get that soldier There is that we have in common We have this on the stay We are but now that ugly There is now a duck There is now an ugly duck We got that also in return We have now this situation completely solved Man So (in this scenery, we see, we hear, the main, and main 2 for gold) 427
428
(The end is just the beginning) So here are the real credits Paul Havenstorm The rest crew unset (Cray prog. Team in 1987) The staying powers The real deals (us) The also men The Money-Money-Money people The rest crew set The also getting there station So we need a fix on the author Who is this Nicki (shows a clip) There is this MAN (the thinker / Cray) There is the coffee lady from I have this idea There is this game I need a new Sig. Graphics Indigo Blue, but a U.85 is also.. welc.
429
430
The Sandman (part 1)
431
432
Table of Content For those that understand Be that or be not Guess what Before and be after The style of this muse The straw that must seep See that what all is There is no real deal on that For so much reasons The truth to that is Great expectations See that, I have a new one Do this or be swat Still that is no read The fine things in QST
433
434
For those that understand There is this man. He is sitting on that street. He is really looking around that street. So. Dear ladies, all gentleman, welcome at this lecture on Quantum state Set Theory. This field was founded in Febr. 2017. What is new about it I hear you say? The boundaries of regular Quantum Mechanics, those are smaller..! The real prediction of regular QM and Field Theory is oh Classical M. Meaning, all predictions of QM/FT beyond CM are... troublesome.. So, why than also that new frame-work? Set theory trosliegieves..in R What does that mean? In R the predictions of CM are TRUE.. but.. In R the predictions of QM are, well.. what (valid) predictions.. oh.. 1 In R the pred. of FT in new style all sem. is Oh..My.. God...tha... 112! Adding (seemingly) just 'set theory' to the wave table/tuple... why..?? Ah, well it is more than that. With that you can do Multiple World st. Oh, what about that. Is that necc. for that ONE explan. of the wave? The goal of QST, partly already reached is.. QST implies ALL FT. yes That seems simple, just the wave table in a set, the math, oh. hahahah The sec. goal of QST, partly reached, is predict NEW stuff unclear in.. The third goal of QST is.. provide a visualization platform for.. YOU The fourth goal, QST is so understandable, shown today, that you..ha! The fifth goal, in QST the things like medicine with X is in reach. So? The sixth goal.. be the QST standard in a Technical situation on indur. The seventh goal, QST needs to be math. sound and complete. Yes!!!! That last one? Reached. Completely. The eighth goal? If the simple insight in QST is used in radio/skin.. !! The ninth goal.. so QST is that what led that science elsewhere to.. !! The tenth goal, why all these ten goals, start at this/that. No. It is allr.
435
436
Be that or be not I now see that garden. I see that skin/radio.. What is that? Skin/radio? The skin, is the skin of life, the shell, the atoms, the all that is seen and felt. The radio, is all the radiation, also sun and nukes. In QST the skin/radio is NOT just also put in... really! Show... OK. First: We have seen this before Oh, that is that wave state See that, we are now under attack We need that taken care of We need that or we die, for sure We see that we are now finally save Oh, that is not nice We need that weapon now.... (N O) (yes, but..) (still no) (but..)... no That is the most I can tell. After the above one, no W. is needed. NO That can be proved mathematically. Still every one his/her choice on.. 437
438
Guess what So................ !! We now go, for this audience, down to the explain business. This, people, is new. So eyes open, look up, that helps, sometimes.. This new field is new for these reasons: The whole of FT is a valid variant of all in QST. Yes. Proven. The whole of QM is NOT a variant of QST, it does not follow.. fine The whole of QST subsumes both FT and CM and also implies TS TS is theoretical semantics, meaning, a visualization tool for you TS is also a math. framework that kind of .. no INFERS new stuff The set of very new implications imply the radio/skin better The set of new implications also include medical improvements These med. appl. are/where never predicted, but some are known Save for that set of new stuff, the framework is incredibly moving That frame work is also elegant, and easy to predict/work with Not for everyone, but that stuff on your screen on the TV.. watch out The above statement? That is a real QST prediction. That stuff? radio
439
440
Before and be after Aha. That is better. Still. Better hand me over that expl. not just statem. Oh, that is... wait. Here goes, again. Did this in Rain Weaver / The Show / The Real Deal So hey, nice sweater... look, a bird, I look. The bird is GONE. Expl. I have that way of you. Meaning...(in QST, if you assume, that.. ouch) So, what are we going to do now? (a choice in QST is a STATE) Have we been up here already? (yes) (WHAT) only for cognoscenti! I beat that drum. Is that Feynman enough..? (ALL Feynman QED, !!) Say, we are now in this place.. is that a real (O....M. GOD!!! go OUT) Save that on the beer cap. So.. (people, do not misjudge QST, it will..) See that on the TV? I see a weapon of sorts. (people, weapons.. KILL) The reason that we are now here? (people, do not use QST products..) The main weapon of cho...(people, QST is an init. for HELP, also) The reason that we are here is that we have this beer cag. (no, lie-er) The need that we have this, is, that we are now in that way.. (f. off) People, QST is a BIG business, meaning, big theory, theorems, and.. !
441
442
The style of this muse I have now this new insight. What do you mean. That wave,... just a set? NO Putting just the wave table in that set is NOT a science. You know what is? First: We have that wave table That wave table is big, with hundreds of parameters sometimes QM is also putting values in that wave table and simulating/predicting QST represents that same wave tab., but ADDS, this is IMPORTANT A proper QST statement is this: H:={} That statement is the Geiger count., but more elegant, and a diff. impl. Also of the representation, that counter an now be moved to anoth. Set This way Moving and Transfer is now VISIBLE. No formula. Yet. So.. If you use the work of prof. B.P. Kooi, that uses multiple world sem. With Kooi's work, his published to date, FT implies QM. QST |= FT !!
443
444
The straw that must seep I am on this horse. That horse walks down that hill. It stops. Dies. Oh. What a rural display. Why a dead horse in a QST lecture? In QST... also predictions on living / dying situations.... !! A dying situation is grave. It means that on a QS basis you decay, y. th. In QST, dying is just a transfer to a new state. BUT. MUCH MORE.. !! So. Why all that... I have just this book to inform you on this new revelation. Here it is. So we are now in this cave We have both a very nice hat on That hat is now to that situation that... oh NO HATS That is not physically possible in CM, but in FT it is. In QST... NEW So that is weird, that does never happen in reality CM.. Oh.. the Wii !! See, we have this great well of energy around us. That Wii contr. IN ?! 445
446
See that what all is I see that all is. People, do you see what all is, and all? I mean. See that, a bounty on the mer. What did I just say. There it is, again: I am this steer person This guide on me is now broke That man is also not ready See that in the brook There is so much in that For that reason we have help There is now this also... help? (no) What world IS this.. ?? That is the stupidest way to say hello.. wh.. (GO AWAY PERSON) For.. all these lines. What do they mean? They are PREDICTIONS See that, that way, we have now on that street? (Oh, you are SCARY) (this may seem un-tillen, this list, but for the knowers it is GOLD) 447
448
There is no real deal on that There is that other meal. We are now on this street. That street, that is a street in heaven. Huh..!! QST implies some 'stuff' like, weird... NO. It predicts the street. Oh..(?) People, so much goes on in QM/QT and QF, but nobody knows exactly which wave table tuple values to believe as true!! Here is the QST take on that. They follow in format: The best way is the best way. The best way is not fast but also not.. The best way, is just, the way that is/was taken earlier. Ant style. !!!!! That, alone, makes that the values of the mega tuple go down to 23 Another one, we do three, all following from the known QST core There is this way to the garage There goes that man and his dog Oh they are both DEAD (QM/FM/FT) Oh they are both ALIVE/DEAD/BOTH? (QST) Oh there goes that man on his yellow bike. Now it is red. (QST)
449
450
For so much reasons I wrote a book on reasoning. Called “The 300 Reasons” 2017. In that book, a lot of stuff that follows from the (now still sealed) QST core (the parameters and further stuff.) In that book, if you listen to a (weak) listener, and are weak your self, you cling. Meaning... you take over that particular weak reasoning style. How? Psychology? It is a QST result, on paper. John Anderson made it real on PC. What about that? In QST? A real solution that is NOT in the CMU archives. So. What about that? See that child? Is that yours.. See that, get me a purse.. what is in i.. UUGGH, that is GROSS In QST that is a corollary. So? Watch OUT STANFORD/HARVARD !!
Now... MORE. (people, QST is just a theory. But it is proper.) 451
452
The truth to that is OK. The truth. Truth approximation. T.A.F. Kuipers. He made this book. SiS. One of his true results is : T = p ∩ q where p is True and q is unknown This one result, I learned it from him in 1993, makes QST a SOUND and proper theory. Another T (diff) = q U p where q is that state where in T. Kuipers work q is a set of true sentences, in QST q is that set with actual wave tuples. Now, p is in T. Kuipers work a set of false sentences, in QST that is a set of not possible tuples, but a set of EARLIER tuples, or, get this.. a completely new tuple added. E.g. a new drug, a pill, that structure, that pill is (now) not in the actual tuple set, but in p, it is now accessible. Using Kooi's work in multiple world semantics that tuple is now in a possible tuple set. And FINDABLE WITH COMPUTATION. So. Try thinking of that without RiD in your head and that QST idea.
More to come in my book, “So Far no Good”.
453
454
Great expectations This is that change. See. I have now seen this. There is this way to that. For all I care I have now... This is the first reason There is another way Is that all there is There is now again this flow Will we ever move There is How about that Mike We will see They have that in the OMG The read is measured Go we on that stead There is this way
455
456
See that, I have a new one There is.
457
458
Do this or be swat Say that again...
459
460
Still that is no read Oh, but, still...
461
462
The fine things in QST People, in QST the QS are story elements... !! Same in FT and some QFT There is NO happy ending possible in both.
In QST there always is one accessible.
Wait!!! This is a very important Q.mech interpretation in Berkeley and some of Stanford, that any state is a story element, but all the sims, the stories on their machines end in death. In QST that is NOT necessary. See my next book ”Story Told” 2017.
463
464
Game
465
466
Table of Contents The real situation with any game is.. Total is the death of the game state There is just this amuze We will and shall put that man on the moon, in that CAR So we get that on the real side Oh We now have that saved We are so unclear The best Rest assured To the station All we need is furkitation What the h. is that That is a real world, I just said it, so shut up Like the chicken soup Chantal is not a game, she is a be 467
468
The real situation with any game is.. Imagine that real nice incr. realistic game. It runs on that almost new Cray U.85, partly still in cellophane, which got CRT terminals, 8, with the BIG resolution, old school clear, and on those eight terminals are 8 avatars. You see that puppet from the side or the back, but never from the front, for thingy reasons (psychological/self image). That is part of Dream Weaver, the first edition 1.03 nailed everything. But... You are in this plane/world... you look around, carefully, mindfully, and you discover, you suddenly manifest in your mind/computer screen that floating upside down table, making a circle in slo-mo. You walk to it. You touch it, it is a (Dutch) weg-is-weg, from the Potter Universe. Suddenly you in that new dimension or place and state. That felt horrible, yet.. OK. You are that other player. You walk around and see water floating as it is nothing. You touch the water. BENG. Same effect, you meet the other person/avatar, meaning (important, pay attention) your sense of the room is the same, you are both at that terminal, but the sense of being somewhere is changed completely. So.. The Game, is a book on Transfer and Duiding (Dutch) and well Stearing, and Believe and Growth. All those concepts from QM and QFT and Q.Flux th. and QFST are all already implemented in DW (Dream Weaver). How did they do it? Still a bit mystery, also a lot of conceptual engineering and.. the code is locked away for posterity. CLOSED. The end result? A sim machine that almost does QM, does FT completely, and Q.Flux... no problem. But QFST, that remains to be seen. If my Nell/shimmering venture takes of well enough, I will acquire my own Cray U.X and move to the states to test the QFST constraint equations on receptor folding and 'decking' in neurpharmacology. And in the mean time, further explore that extra Q.space namely Game0 and Story1. Game0 is unexplored, Story0 is ok. 469
470
Total is the death of the game state Look around that game space, the one like say WoW any edition. What are you. That avatar? But you choose that doll in the beginning. Well.. So when you die in that space, what happens to your still very aware consciousness? You wander around, earthbound, like a pin prick with flashing lights in a globe, I call it a point spirit, or a point. So. Your consciousness, just a point in another space? And when 'dead' you suddenly are in that misty space that LOOKS like the 'earth' space? Uhm. When you die, is the world still there? THINK When you 'return', is the world still the same? Walk it through in your mind. If you really die, what happens to that point of aware consciousness. All philosophy. I do not think so. More... practical observation science. That is what is I am practicing now, P.O.S. practical observ. sc. OH!! What does that mean. Wait... the clock runs. Do you know that in any Q field there is an energy 'clock' that can be felt? Anything that you do not WITHIN your time feels like... tired tired tired. But in your TIME that is being in sync with your consc. wave you feel UP UP UP. In the US the Q.man know this but cannot sell it, because, yes they do understand but, do not NEED it in their economic models for when people buy or 'stay'. Ahum. This book? The Game, Game for short. Please parti. Pen. Paper. Q. Go. 471
472
There is just this amuze There is just this way I say. To what I may. I read that on the steady way. There is this genome on that stuff. Oh I get that, what's the cruff There needs to be a better well.,... well... !! Say that out loud and I must tell We the Fortunuous all are great Say we get that are we deaf The real deal is now that save To the marture I get strave Set the dial now I confess Stay that there I need that best To the total I will be Say we are, say we see There is so much garden in this fence The test is needed The rest is all we get Stroop 473
474
We will and shall put that man on the moon, in that CAR There is that man on the steady stop We get that all, we get that trop The menagerie is just that meat There is so much staven all that teet There is so great a sudden I can tell Tres that pattern Tres that gat Sell that batten Wee that sat All we need now To this may Tell the fortune To the tee I need comforth I say now U got treaty
Say that way
Y (say this/shimmer/Cray) 475
476
So we get that on the real side All we have is this one state in class. q. mech. That means, how to predict the NEXT state, and how much time does it take, Oh. In Q.Flux that is measured in allstates, almost sets, better, almost tuples Ah....! (but) We need that in QFST, or, do we. Yes we don't, because we aim to .. We aim to, this field, to imply all positive results from QM/QFlux/FT/.. If we want to focus on just those we forget to look at the main core, of QFMT and that was, is, still to come in a book called “The Dark Window”, already worked out. Ah.... well, but, and all...(grump) That is it!!
477
478
Oh There is this saying, do we need to get on with that same old same old same old behavior, that is all there is all there is all there is,... NO!!!!! Uhm, that's firm, tone down please. See, when in a game, how many options do we have? You have beh.1 beh.2 beh.3 beh. 4 … beh. 36. So, you go through all the methods of your avatar, and after 45 tries you find out that owwww I am a beh. 16 kind of man/woman, but... uh... oh. STILL beh.16 and my girl is always a beh. 17. Isn't that something... What is the lesson here? In a human brain see that cortex and motor neurons, and...ooooh. But Culture makes that set almost ,10 percent of all what is possible. For the rest, we look at dancers and skaters, but... if our kid does a whoopaa in the street with people watching? OMG that needs to be toned down fiercely and immediately. So. When we have 10.000 possible Beh. In a set. You get the picture... By the way, ANY Beh.n is a PORTAL to another person or a Beh.m If you can muster up a dance or a walk, and people find it too difficult to copy, in their mind or whatnot, than, you are the man or the gal, you win the preference.. for everything. Oh yes. Dance away in your living room, try it … there.. you win! (try, don't cry or sigh)
479
480
We now have that saved Oh we now have that saved.
Oooooooh...!! What does THAT mean. When we play that Nint. Game or that BIG MMORPG (I literally played them ALL), we get a sense of 'save'. In Dream Weaver there is no such thing. When you calculate (Dream Weaver is still the best, better than Mathematica, because... YES!!! S H U T U P!, those last two are the arguments from some students in Math Lab... anyway...uuuuuuhm..pf) when you calculate a real body state in QM your doll stands there, and DIES, immediately, no transfer in and of states known or possible, just Hey I am he... DEAD. Ouch. Better in FT models, still, walking, stearing (WOW!!!) and o.m.....g... (cries) d e a d. Sigh. People. More about those things in my next book: “So long and thanks for all the Fish”. Transfer/Stearing/Clearing/Clinging/skin:radio/more/MORE A save state in a game? OMG a COMPLETE FREEZE of the doll and the WHOLE WORLD, particle for particle. Is that possible IRL? (yes) A save state in the real world? Ooo...o...oh. OH. That is just staying at home and going to bed? NOOOOOOOOOOOOOO. It is Staying. Also in that above book the Q. superposition Staying/Staypower.. As a last remark, is saving important? You can 'save' in the Shimmering 481
482
We are so unclear Who is unclear? People, understanding is JUST connecting two states in your mind, or following those lines between states from state one to state two. So. I am John. I think S1 I am Marcy. I think S3 and S6 imply S1. I am Carl. Joh, does Marcy understand S1, do you think? What does/must John say? Let's ASK HER... (is that done NO !! g-d) Marcy can link Si to statements in her mind, she knows 'an' explanation. So. For her S1 is cleared UP. Hearing an explanation, like hearing.. the expl. of Marcy means,.. YOU try to connect to the same dots in YOUR mind, hindred/helped by others, and well.. that goes like this... Read “The 300 Reasons”, and understand completely. In The QFST field? This book is one of its modules.. understanding is a MARK for real experimental research. Period. With an own frame, and me as a frontier scientist. More in the book: “A river runs dry”. In total: Clearing stuff up means connecting dots in your head, also neuronalogically and visually on the experience level.
483
484
The best The best is just the best. What the h-hole is the best anyway. I don't know..............................................!! Am I the best? Or is that.. beast of a brilliant girl, she, ar... the best? No No No No No No No NON !! That is not a beast... wha... WHAT Ah... All that shitty mess about winning and needing to be bettered, all Cult. So, we are going to run run Cray U.85 DW 1.03 models of... He is the best, but he is better (ow) She is the greatest, she thinks, he thinks better (owwwww) Let there be no renown on that (a DW/Cray U.85 setting, YES/no) I hear that lion roar Am I... (yes) There is just this test There is meanness in that beaty (get the f away from him) Read the morning paper, is that a cow (no, stupid print., upside down) The rest is just that, a BO (that is technical, not a bo, a BO, no excl.) These are real test situations on the Cray in Dream Weaver, need testing 485
486
Rest assured I have this reason to get a Story in here that is now THAT NICE ! ! ! ! A story in Quantum Physics is just SO important. That means if a continuous state is always ALWAYS something that goes to something else. That means a NEXT story, is a next set of constrained states. Oh.
Lekker dan...! (dacht ik net, dus ZO...nee!) More in my book “Story”.
487
488
To the station We are now at that station. (cut and paste from all parts of The Sup. St.) What have we learned now from this and that on... the station. The Super Station (See my book with that title) is a super set, a coll. Well.... What have we here. Now ONE of these in the super set, is just, a station. A save point for that game in H.. NO ONE station, is just, a state with..... make yourself think....? A.....? We.. Ah. That needs more clearing up to do. My speciality, clearing stuff up to.. Next also book: “Love & New Connections”.
So... on to that game stuff. This series, is a complete series, called the 'Project Human'-series. (exiting isn't it? Games, stories, darkness, revery, Cray, consc., pills) 489
490
All we need is furkitation Yes get THAT please. One Furkitatio....oh my brain melted. If you hear any new word, you get a brain freez, with pain, that means Axons grow... long and strong and HARD and fast. That can be seen under a microscope. But how to model that and WHY. Yes. Yes, yes, yes, yes.... (do we still really need that furki... no? Oh. Good. That was what I...w.)
491
492
What the h. is that Wait a minute, you are now waiting to get to the Game part? Man, this is a Q Math book, on tuples and slices and transfer.. Real Games? On your phone? Man the Big Game is that what YOU do on this EARTH, with and to OTHERS. That is the game. All these topics are all part of it. So. Parts of the game in QFST? The real situation on time slice 1 The unreal (uncollapsed/unsatisfied) tuple range on slice 34 The cold the real sit. of st. 89 when that person is really dead The rest of the match, that what we see from slice #4 and 67, acces The access, that access that goes from slice 1 to slices The real deal, that what CAN be done to become in slice 45787788 The Shadow, that what we cannot see NOW, but is sl. 785817113858 The Dark Window
(scary, spirits, the curtain, more, much more)
The Stage Oh that what we see, skin:radio Rain (woven) that is SCARY.... later more, a real Q. Flux thing... The Sandman OMG, let him LIVE, that is sim of LIFE The river that runs through that is consciousness, but unclear how.. 493
494
That is a real world, I just said it, so shut up If you model a real world on Dream Weaver or a Mac, just in Math Lab, you see so much... OMG, that is scary... but on a screen When you are finally able to program the Shimmering with some.. THAT is scary. When you first make your prediction on that Cray U.85 on DW and than see all those phenomena REAL... THAT IS A PARTY !!!!!!!!!!! So... join the club or tell your others about scrabbies or something... (I mean it)
495
496
Like the chicken soup I once met a nice girl, she is called Chantal. She is famous now, because I explain about her – I did not have an affair, important, explained – in so many books... well. Ok. Some people have very different states. Chantal, a wonderful woman, exists in a continuous high energy state representable in the quantum state tuple. If that energy is very high 900+ there are other state tuples accessible that are not accessible for me even if I try. That is an interesting venture. More on that in this book: “The Dark Window”. So...
497
498
Chantal is not a game, she is a be So, that avatar, is that all there is to you? Yes/no, well.. In Q.Physics the real state is always the n state of the n time slice.. Sooooo that means Chantal is a real woman but she walks sometimes like a real 'dame' If someone like Chantal gets into a fight, sh. wins always, if sh. wants To her the Universe is a quiet space with strange noises (Y. shit) Have you met her once, you'll feel different for ever (true, pers. ex.) Does she has that very un-energetic way sometimes? Y/n (personal) Why is she so special? She has an energy sig. Under QFST of 920. What is the energy scale of that tuple var. 15-1000+++ So..
This is it. It is the Hawking scale, for the Cognoscenti and I write about it in my book-let “The Scale” (2017) under Ellis California.
499
500
The Show
501
502
Table of Contents Coffee on the table No relieve in training All that and no return Be the best, and be the rest All those people in my face To go with that person, just for all that For me I have no clue To be I want another one Stop looking silly I need one of those To close that deal No nose on my regard Trouble in heaven Cop out now please So this is all there is The true story about this neighborhood
503
504
Coffee on the table Welcome. Welcome to the Show. This paper/piece/pamflet/book-let about Quantum State Set Theory Possible background (if possible) Computing Simplicity Rationality in Discovery The Super Station The Real Deal Rain Weaver This paper sets out the core and the boundaries of this new not only theoretical field within but also outside Quantum Mechanics and Theoretical Philosophy. The Problem The Core Ideas The Solutions (as known for now Feb. 2017) The already solved situations (partly) The Show The Application The possible Candidates for solving The Real Deal, prt. 2 505
506
No relieve in training So.. The (real) problem. Consciousness. Its affect, its effect on .. others. There we go. Hold on... (for the Show) (The Show := Consciousness) Consc. is a phenomenon, that is assumed. Physical reality..is that. Also? The Problem. The Current (side-)Show explanations of that, of consc. are all. Well.. OK. This approach? Take away EVERYTHING, before we start. Yes we take the God's eye perspective looking at/to the whole universe.. So. All swell and all, but..? Look, look INSIDE the universe. Take the Quantum Mechanics view, Quantum Flux, or Quantum State (regular) or Quantum Field eye and really look INSIDE that 4D... see? Well. People moving around on this dust spec. They... interact. They, we know down stairs, experience a real phenomenon, namely “consciousness” and all its peculiarities that are widely documented for EONS in human history. So, we really NEED to take consc. very seriously, even before we start. No scepticism or .. Ah. We see that, ah....... that wave. Is it ONE wave? YES! But.. oh, we already solved everything!!!!!! That apple on my book “De Verstuiving” also about this, that is PART of that huge super wave, the wave of the known universe and beyond. So... simple reasoning, take that in with salt: cons. is hence(forth) ALSO (part) of that big wave. So. 507
508
All that and no return That is the Basis for all of Quantum State Set Theory. Now... A Quantum State: A.... omg, what is it anyway? Unknown? Descr. in? A Real Theory: A set of statements that imply knowns, including unkn. A Real Problem (in science): Those unknowns that (might) need that th. A Solution: The whole reasoning thread (compl) between theory and all So.. What about that. (Regular) Quantum Mechanics? Does that explain everything? Well.. Does it explain that consciousness and ALL of its phenomena so very well documented by literature and the rest of known science? I do not think so. It is part of the (regular) explanations of those few (theoretical) situations. We do not talk about the sper strings people, but explain my taste of say that coffee on my desk in my office. Where is the whole line of reasoning from QM (regular) to that? Specify please before emailing me. Again. The Problem. Basically? What is consc. What of it? That set of potential problems? All human experience well documented, the OBJECTIVE side. The subjective? That... (follows in another book-let) Oh. 509
510
Be the best, and be the rest I said it in The Real Deal. I, Alexander P. M. van den Bosch take on any serious problem very seriously, and delve IN. That subject... consc. has been pestering me and my big books in everything since .. 1988. What I learned from (theoretical) philosophy? Take THAT problem set, and those (yours) assumptions that need to be exclusive with respect to the colleagues in any field, and make basically those sentences that, when reasoned well, clearly and valid, produce, infer, the situations in those well described phenomena. Do that, Lakatos style, with a core, Kuhn style, and you HAVE a field. Attract co-thinkers/doers, and make those sc. papers a reality, and surprise with: New (unknown before) predictions, and solve problems (infer) of other existing fields... and the list goes on. Well. This is the core. The Outset. We have this core: We NEED the concept of, get this: A Wave. We have this OTHER core: We Have this 'tool' from Set Theory.. but.. We also have: that concept from Alan Turing, the bit string and, wel.. We have this basic phenomenon that NEEDS a infer set of expl. It is.. Consciousness as... a real OBJECTIVE phenomenon, described by.. Psychological reports? (yes) All of human literature (yes/no) All of Physics (huh?/maybe/yes/no). Let us start with this: Consciousness is in the Universe... SO: Consciousness... is just... a... Wave. Let that sink in for a few... if you are familiar with all stuff in QM. So..? 511
512
All those people in my face See, you walk that street, with all those people passing by. You look upon them. They are in the known universe. Everything in the (objective) universe, is, yes I learned that during physics classes in 1990, I took extra next to AI, on my own accord... the.. well. You..? You are part of the wave. That other person? Part of the wave. What collapses the wave to 'a' quantum st.? Well? Physics uses/assumes/knows: Oh the 'observer', yes YOU. Looking at those slits... that. Well. The cat in the box? Is that proved experimentally? Yes. Or..? So. Logic again. Modes Ponens, no fancy generalization... If... ok. You are a wave. That slit experiment set up? A wave.. SO? That wave of THAT observer th.. no no no.. that is PAROCHIAL (known) What is (not)? A wave (YOU) collapses that red apple on 'De Verstuiving' also a..wave A wave collapses another wave. You (obs. q.state) coll. apples. (yes) That means, the mathematics? Is it ALL resonance? Uhm... (think) A wave (part) collides with that other wave (part), result in total? A new wave? No, they are both part of that huge super wave that IS all q.states in the known also observable universe. So... on to! (the consequence..) 513
514
To go with that person, just for all that I walk that street. I see that nice person. I hold hands with her. What am I, what is SHE, what are we? All... yes.. A q.state. And only she? yes. And just he? well? EVERYTHING is THAT WAVE So the real difficult mathematics on that is, what? All resonance between wave states parts what not? Uhm.. that is basically regular QM. No. We are going to innovate. Meaning... bring on DIFFERENT assumptions (not just wave wave wave) a new set of old tools (very old) and a few people willing and eager to think through all NEW unknown consequences, at first, and, later, check those NEWLY inferred assumptions about the Quantum aspects of this huge world. That is the experimental phase of this new Research Programme, Lakatos style. The theoretical part? Using also wave-mathematics, but first: We do not need the concept of 'computation', because, WHERE is it!! We need, NEED, the idea/tool/reality of Quantum States (q.states) But, we ALSO might need, no we need... strings, as in total qs expl.s AND, we need.. a journal. Already in the works: J.QST. Ok. Thats th. Extra, we need collaboration, with yes.. Later, we need some 'gear', for the rain paper/flower/slit exp in new. 515
516
For me I have no clue Here it is again. The as of yet never uttered, Google proved core os this. Consc. is (just) part of the super wave, a collective, known in QM. (yes) So. The next, theoretical necessary for a proper theory core element: Stay the way. Or.. (a QM saying). That means, explain also MOVING. It does (wait for it) Next: Say, we need that outside the Universe observer. (?) (no, but...no) Also extra: We are going outside, yes, why no visible collapse on this/th The last one: A REAL theory is just.. a statement: The Theory of Quantum State Set Theory: I have a universe I need that wave explained PER state. (outside) Do we need that outside observer? (no) Say we are IN that universe and observe that apple, what if.. (ah) Save that apple. It.. rots (moving in QM). Why? (oh, no tr. but obec) Are we ever going to be able to make that apple look green.. (ah) Say, we are now on planet X, the difference? (expl. with qs sets &) 517
518
To be I am this very real QS. Is that a wave part? No, that is just a qs. Yes!!! So... here we go, again: The real universe is just that. But.. I am in that big huge universe. I am, off course..? Just? I am a qs. Do we now have that real QST theory all worked out. Just the core. In that general way of observing everything. What is.. that/this. Wait. I have that 'feeling' known as anigmatic delurance. Expl. Not yet. So I see no real math yet in this book The Show, why.. First the core. I need that math now please to judge. Ok. A=3, g=78, t=0. The deal. Can I do some mathematical inference on that whole? It is Set Theory. So.. Ah. The break.
519
520
I want another one Do you know why Gary Zukav in the Wuli masters did that thing with the flower? Did it work? In QST there is just that. That wild flower. Now,... we look. We see, ow how does set theory put a thing on/in that? Ok. The work. Here is the Real Deal (again). We have this universe We have this (huge) qs So. That is it..? OK. Let us try that again.. We have th.. People, a qs is a SET with attributions with numerals and whatnot!!! That SET represents, for that qs a whole...no not just a slice, that is old school, add ONE property valuator, and wow, a process. A moving. That is NEW...!!! (read up on Field Theory, if you please, not in there) So, what does that mean, for QST (Quantum state Set Theory)? It means, oh that part, moving, is just ONE part of that theoretical core. Say...? (next) 521
522
Stop looking silly But why all those... OK, I am mr. comp. simpl. That now book made me think incredibly hard about all aspects of every aspect of science. It made me come to a part in that now book “The Border of Knowledge”, just.. wait. It set my mind to thinking that, conceptually the WHOLE universe is just a bit string, a finite one at that, and... the rest in that yes book. But I imagined putting strings in sets already in 1993. The point? To this all? Oh. Just FIRST try that simple study? No, just start out with simple everything, and scale to right complexity UPWARD,... as NEEDED. That is what this new now very new field is all about. Rain Weaver is an intention doc. Firmly set out and put forth to science. So.. What is new in QST with respect to regular Field Mechanics and QM? 1. Say... that moving? Is that a process? Yes/no? NO, it is imaring (FT) 2. Say.. what about that köning-spread unusp.? Now transf. 3. I have that Boulle, is that now invalid? No.. it is also transf. By trf. 4. I need that math now. A set, IS, not a single qs, per se, but? Right. No 5. Do we also have room for that green apple. Oh please.. (yes, but..) 6. I get that all is well and best with you because.. (that is slander) md 7. I get that I have that better math ready.. Not needed in this phase. Yes 8. There is that real problem, in FT, how many expl. of that.. (78%) Yes 9. See that curtain, also explained, the unobserved? (oh yes, but..... no) 10. That set of new phenomena. Well? St., tr., po.,wa., pl., yt., uj., ol.,uj.
523
524
I need one of those That is a nice set of claims. How.. Please people, give some room. Look at all the book-lets and that is the core. The rest is human engineering, getting a real group together. With competences such as: computation/string representation people, set theoretical acclimated people, some very serious FT/QM people with an open mind, the administrative people, location. More. Real science with real prospect. So... Here is what is already in place: The theoretical cores The real problems (in this booklet) The very administrative procedures (yes) The Journal in progress: The Journal of Set Theory in QM (JSTQ) The whereabouts of my own results on a lot already worked out Invitees to this field (in the proposal doc. Rain Weaver) The setting down of this new field via the international guide lines. So, are you in or are you out. There is still more...
525
526
To close that deal Here is the math. Very precise attention is required, because it is mostly new. Look, before.. The restuon station. The big whole wave := That is just the result of QFT. So.. the extra's The big whole complete wave := How did I arrive at this? This wave letter, is 'a' interpretation of the whole known universe, including known Mechanics. This, people, is a set of all those parameter variables. You can do real math with this set. Example? Take the NOW universe, that tuple, and take say a oh another possible NOW universe. Do some say possible world semantics on that. That way we get the explanations of any phenomenon, or those nice juice predictions about that 'green'/'red' apple. That already in this tuple. More to come? Yes. 527
528
No nose on my regard Hey, all, what about that real creative side of people. That has been my personal interest since 1988. My PhD is on scientific creativity. I personally met John Searle and Margaret Boden. I think about it sometimes daily. When I work on something as intense as on Computing Simplicity and ow.. 11 years worth of Rationality in Discovery, and work REAL hard to make all VERY concise, and very dense? And do another day job for years, and oh, yes that medical situation, oh.. and a swat of SEVEN years 'time off' because of that medical condition? What do you think that I do, a trained all thinker, in that time, in those very lonely hours? I think, trained in sets and TM bitstrings, about EVERYTHING. But creativity and CONSCIOUSNESS mostly. And, when I take on a creative spurt as a divers writer, and (re)publish both theses, and well, read them again, in the wake of years and years of new very not thought of before style, my usual style (accredited)... sometimes the brain just. Oh, surprises completely. That starts with... oh work out that very sudden idea in that lecture doc. The Real Deal, in the way of a very professional trainer. And, wait for it, that was not... People, I am going on with this anyway. I sometimes publish daily. Creative content, also incredibly well thought out. I trained that in Groningen. So... I am here to stay. I am an independent, that matters, I set my own courses. This The Show doc? Another world wide invitation. And the burning question? How did a cogn. sc. PhD with philosophy get the Q.M. smarts all of a sudden. The real answer. Where were you all those years? That is IT. Thanks. 529
530
Trouble in heaven So, you can run those heaven simulation in Field Theory. With just the parameters/undulences of that field/wave set. Here is another one: That Heaven := So, how did we get this one, this field equation? When you think on a daily basis about first principles, you can deduce in your head with 'visualization'. And setting/trying just that and that par. with basically no idea what they are doing?... Well. So. What about that. These waves/fields are well just run on Cray style machines and LOOKED at, what to deduce for medicine? You need those first principles. And your big brain, that is bigger than these.. these very large tuples. In that new field? QST? Sets. Period. Why? ..!! 531
532
Cop out now please There is a man on that street again. Oh...... O H. Here is another one.
There is that WOMAN, in this horrible bed in that fine HOSPITAL. In this new field, I at least am going to think HARD about the QST consequences for medicine, at LARGE. I know about neuropharmacology and gene splicing and receptor folding. I worked on simulations of folding receptors in 1998, with a mac! That and the guardian of the core. That is now already MY role in QST. So.
Why the tone? I am a very trained coach and trainer, in science, medicine, nursery and big money business. Most people do NOT know me, at all. Because, I hardly talk about it, and I am unassuming. I work my ass of on a daily basis, and... here it is. Science is cut throat. The big science. I learned that in my work for the Medical Faculty and QANU in Utrecht. If you need something done or kept in ANY high prospect venture, you need GUTS, and stamina and brain. For this start-up field, nothing else. Oh. Yeah, you need support. So. 533
534
So this is all there is So. You have seen the couple of books, thought Oh and Ah.. That what is presented in my books, is the surface, the core and the business plan. (Yes I did a technical MBA for a full year, as well).
Why this book? The book: Rain Weaver was a proposal This book: The Show, a room with a small view The next book: The Sandman, a steady underlying of QST Thus...
Thank you.
535
536
The true story about this neighborhood Ah, I am still on that street, I saw that carpet, the flower, the whatnot.. But... why not thinking/simulating that... just. Are you in QM or FT for over 10 years? Instead just looking at that sim screen and tuning? No not first principles, just... just another view, just, no not hospital stuff, that is, hard and painful to watch.. What about any scene that you think...not you, you've done that, but .. Oh........ whatever. I have work to do.
I made sure that in any case, well after Rain Weaver, I have... OMG, I am doing it again. Everybody makes his or hers own choice..
Put THAT in your simulation! CHOICE, real, real CHOICE!! Thank you.
(Groningen, feb. 13, 2017) 537
538
The Thing (Q.sim's on the Cray for testing FT and C.QM)
539
540
Table of Content I see that rear shadow I need that on the till we are now but in together We are there but all is still To that quest I need that stolen There is just one thing to do Be that as it may my friend all that is is just that, ALL Be there or be in prison still To that all be on that way Say we get that on these ravens Say we must I say ok There is just that that helps To the must I get ok I need that on the double baby To the rest I say save Chantal 541
542
I see that rear shadow I hear a strange thing. This thing is a beast in the curtain There is There is that standard book in Dutch called De Standaard Oh I see Het Overzicht Those Dutch books seem irrelevant They are everything in sim'in the Human State in all form So Here is the deal What is The Thing The Thing is the old Cray U.85 from 1987 US On that U.85 Dream Weaver 1.03 The Thing That is that what we are going to simulate The Thing = The Time slice Human Being State Complete That is NEW on this Earth-plane, at this time.
543
544
I need that on the till These themes/memes/sentences look silly and random They are (partly) code for the Dream Weaver 1.03 program These sentences go to a grand total That total is the whole program with a library That library is a sim lib. A sim lib. is very powerful YU There is that letter again Y is that space of time slices that are weird wrt T T is all that is True on earth NOW Oh That is that 'Oh' again It means, got that, but wait See this is fine There is this reasoning to that There is that man
545
546
we are now but in together We are now in that burning house Inside is Andre van Duin His barn was set on fire by the agency that wanted him at home Oh What kind of sentence is that That is that we are all controlled Is that a problem No we have this way To that I say, sayonara To that I say, let me in this place I beat that on the bush There is now that state There is that very much needing house Oh, what about THAT We go on in a week or so Please do not go home (I do anyway) 547
548
We are there but all is still So here we have this still on that We get that on the till We need that on the rest There is still so much iron We best that we get the deal To the room we bet we can Oh we can that in full Please So we are in that same behave Plead Y U Rest Plead for your life U are now a dead silence That did not go to plan
549
550
To that quest I need that stolen I get that on the till Still you have that way I mean that on that machine At Lulu I have a own desk with junk and stuff maybe Oh a error that one again about a eon and so a app a all that is great is also that weak Be that in the may Bare with me on that state U got that in the stable The rest is just the rest Ples All that marking So I have this state There is that state There is that field Those markings are not mine, but are made by that state 551
552
There is just one thing to do So we have this chase I chase this on the lace There is that on the till TV is just for me skin:radio is not for me That is part of real Y There is that great fortune There is that all that stands So we get that in the till Stop getting in the till Oh that is stopped D get that dead man on there in his head So we must now all see him That is so lame There is that station on the beat side, get it 553
554
Be that as it may my friend Stay for now to be my friend Let me all but down I have this to say I have I best that be down Let there all be stat I say I have all that is I get down to me I say Stat that on my trust There is now that station There is now that feeling There is now a gutting of that There is that we feel inside Oh a Y in the U That is not a U that is a real D So STOP right NOW No
555
556
all that is is just that, ALL ALL ALL 1 ALL 3 ALL 87 ALL 0 ALL Pi ALL Lemniscaat ALL-ALL To that I say, find your own all We go for a cup of coffee The consciousness is the ONE Which consciousness is what Later is that healed In the best that is See that on the rest I say There is that alternation U 557
558
Be there or be in prison still I am in prison I am almost dead That is what we have my friend We have that way in there always To the left that box to the left to the left There is so much on to the right There is much to get There I have the set There is no guitar in there PLODE To that state I migrate I get that on the till Steady with the till What is it that we have on this There is that clown The Thing is now alive (WHAT !!!! FIRST TIME EVER) 559
560
To that all be on that way There is just this beaty All we need is stuffed food All we get is just this resin All we need is test and stood To that rest room We now have a day on our own I like it when we are there So we have this on the till That is NOT the way home There is so much heaven to that That milk is NOT alive The rest is also not Alive To that we have this stickle To that we get that rest We all now have this partiture There is not that, but WASTE (So the Milk almost walked away, but the thing, still lives !!) 561
562
Say we get that on these ravens We get that on these ravens All we have is guns The guns are aimed at straight-forks All we do is shoot The ravens now are dead That was not very nice I have this all but silent To that corpse I say gay Let that not be an insult but a state of joy Those words are so miscellaneous So the King of France is almost killed There is that photo of his girl No I don't like Sophie on that wall Take it down or I will cry Save that institution Get that up or down (So that photo of Sophie, that is mine, and of Merijne, get it off please) 563
564
Say we must I say ok Say I must now be clear All I set is Turk To the milk made Their is that way to Milkheaven So I say I must U got that all I have that smile Now please take off that smile alone That is very creepy There is no return Stay the distance I have a gay way to stay away okay, yeay That was lame So what Why so much story in DW 1.03 That is the ending (Oh) 565
566
There is just that that helps I have this case of soup That crate now is gone we must get that on the till We are now on that side We get THAT YEEEEEEEEEEEES What F that all about Yes It was about REAL REAL is the domain for D OH What is your PROBLEM I have a tuple set that is EMPTY Why do I need to fill it with GREEN That makes NO sense Let me do so anyway Let that be a side-show Oh (Oooooooooooooooooooooooooooh! What?) 567
568
To the must I get ok I Have Here A Herring That is not very nice Please put that back carefully So I need that TANK GO … OUT … AND … FUEL … PLEASE … OK That is so weird I have a partition on that single There is so much way to go GET WHAT Those four commands are exclusionarily stapid Is that Dream Weaver Syntax NO yes Oh Explain Well (In Dream Weaver a new word/sent. becomes a context par. immed.) !! 569
570
I need that on the double baby I need that on the double I need that on the double now I need that on the double tomorrow I need that on the double yesterday I need that on the double right now I need that on the double never I need that on the double day after tomorrow I need that on the double look I need that on the double look out I need that on the double stay I need that on the double omg I need that on the double GREAT I need that on the double F U I need that on the double I get that REALLY I need that on the double NO NO NO I need that on the double mister
571
572
To the rest I say save Chantal Chantal (context par. at the TOP) She walks like the moon The moon is full She is in the house Y Oh she hears those voices as well She talks to hardly anyone She talks to me she cries with me she sings too loud I love her complete She loves me hardly We are just friends (were) Now she walks shyly Now she is a goddess (in the syntax table, lookup) She is now also beautiful and round (no picture of Chantal, e.s. 920? pitty, now you have one almost) 573
574
Tested
FT f1/f3/9/56/56/3/f45 (save)
C.QM f1/f5/f6 (save) f9/h9/45/34 (problematic)
Q.Flux f1/f56/9/78/100 (all very save) h100 (failed with disruption and seg,)
In QST all would be save
575
576
So Long & Thanks for all the Fish
577
578
Table of Contents The trouble with some things I have a gun but it is shared Leave me on my bed of flowers Stay the trust I must be Still I am not that kind But I am are you too Let that be a monster Oh I love that monster, is it tame Now wait you here and see god-dammit Watch your mouth you tough angry monster beasty I am not your friend anymore If you talk like that you might never be again Why are you so tame to me I live it when you succeed either way That is strange and an affront That is the problem see it MY way... Oh. 579
580
The trouble with some things I am in this house. That house is a nice room filled way to outside. I am inside. I want to go outside. That is a multi-state problem for me. I want to transfer from THIS state in the room to THAT state in the outside 'room'/'experience'. How to commence, and how to rationally: The States: I am in this room R : < I, The chairs, A table, that bread, … , Door > There is outside O : < People running, a swing, … , Door to the house> Problem P : < Transfer, R, O, moves, wildfire, obstructions, me > How to solve that problem rationally. That is how to transfer state R to state O, regarding all constraints from P. Well, is there a solution? On Dream Weaver (1.03) that goes as follows: He is in that room There is the outside He wants to be outside There is that problem (specified) He goes to another state correct with the problem He does so again and again until... He is outside (in Mathematica that problem is almost uncomputable due to NP - prob) 581
582
I have a gun but it is shared So now I see a potential QFST colleague, say B.P.K. He is in that room with a white board. He solved one of the core problems of QFST, or is it just QST. Well I do want to know so I want to meet him. I heard he solved through the grapevine. That is interesting. His prove is his alone, I can understand that. But doe he know from my earlier pre-published proves of QST and QFST? I like to ask him. I walk to that building. Allas I am barred to enter that premisses because I am not welcome because of someone else who is the boss there. I do not know where Barteld lives anymore, he moved house and did not tell me. I get a mail from him. He does not want to look at my papers, none of them, for “reasons”. I accept that full an trust him still. I found out that some of my group started working on the problems I set out in The Real Deal and the other QFST Module/series books. Great but all seem to have the need that since I do not work in Academia at this time that they, and only they can and will legitimately claim both the problems and their solutions as their own, without a thank you but only a fuck off of sorts. OK. I am now sick at home but is this academic Culture with former and familiar friends in Groningen? Bit of a shocker. Glad that I publish all my problems and proto-solutions in the US first. Still, I am still eager to work alongs, side to side, because I also as a practical scientist see the value in also the (medical) applications and these people are oblivious about those sides, focussing only on the nice simple formalisms. So thrush? B. will you take me not for Granted? And J.W. Will you share your result? And T. will you respond already? And D. will you...oh you are the senior. I trust you completely. So... Oh. Jeroen, uhm I did not ask you for the set theory but helping with the Cray for the BIG prove not in meme but in Q196. Can you handle? 583
584
Leave me on my bed of flowers I have now that song to share, a song that is Meme compliant with U.85 The rest is just to unduelest get that on the station we albeit must all untest we get now that civil unrest stay that way we are but yet stay but in the room will you get that all contest I stay and very soon There must now be all that way leave it to a pro Get the nest of undelest Stay in bet be gone There is now this monoculence I get there will you see I get there so stop that best so we are not Seen There is the rest There is that man
(this 'song' makes a difference is sim'n blood) 585
586
Stay the trust I must be I get there on my own (another start for DW 1.03 on Cray U.85) Try us on that seed Be there all wee need some how All we have is greed So on to that we must unbet Tell that to that bark Tell the secret I do test Sell it to a song Now, will you sing this with me No That is Y omg Can we leave this place dear We just got here man of mans That is not so true I liked it better earlier (in this DW sim on the Cray those two drown) 587
588
Still I am not that kind Ah... there we go again with another DW/Cray sim but.... (omg) So we are in this place That place kind of stinks of rot There is that red man Why am I now punctured and bleeding fast You are still in that long cage Why am I alive, still Can we go out now dear I need a asperine of sorts That pill burned my throat away, completely That did not heart at all, why Can we have some answers dear Where did you people put my fiancee Why is she at those gallows in red I am going to cry loud Can I buy a ticket OUT (you cannot, once in sim hell you die or you perish or just watch hell) 589
590
But I am are you too Final DW1.03/Cray U.85 sim on isotopes in jelly There is that jelly In it that iso Barium xxx That isotope is really firy That was not in the can at first Why is the whole lab suddenly on fire We need to run with our lives Why does the Cray display all those lights all of a sudden Is that so intensive I thought an isotope was simple It is not in jelly Oh Y O M G That was a total meltdown of the whole lab why I stopped caring after I saw that the Cray is now damaged (the older Cray needs help to garbage collect but is BETTER bec. Secr.) 591
592
Let that be a monster Let that be a monster Let that be a happy monster Let that be a (you fill in) monster Let that be a (you fill in) monster Let that be a (you fill in) monster Let that be a (you fill in) monster Let that be a (you fill in) monster Let that be a (you fill in) monster Let that be a (you fill in) monster Let that be a (you fill in) monster Let that be a (you fill in) mother Let that be a (you fill in) mother
Let that be a (you fill in) mother (you see???? The difference after seeing to much monsters is, y m. is?) 593
594
Oh I love that monster, is it tame In Dream Weaver on the Cray there are many cute and horrible monsters, all from a random generator. The Idea was used in that BIG Saturn RPG with the flying dragons, Panzer Dragoon Saga, on;y in that game the dragon You ride listens to random commands and TRANSFORMS mid flight organically, longer, longer neck, wider span, more fire, claws, a whole class set. I played it to death and went to another city to get it and a Sega Saturn. Good time (that music sonaaaa) Enfin. When you love any tame beast, in DW, on that Cray terminal with the interface shit, you, you misjudge that ANY monster sort of bites so that you die from it, even when they twist their tales like in Game of Thrones or your Chiwawa. Watch out. The Gray does hardly teach you fear, but even with a (small) all white screen media room attached to it, still something is missing. Creatures are almost all high energy beings that you can feel. And if you cannot, they can YOU, very astute so. So if you approach a horse very carefully but... that horse is gonna WIN the eternal dance/fight of dominance. Just as your dog, the small one, if only that dog decides when you need to take that out. That is in the house, but also in... DW 1.03, not in the later versions due to bla bla bla bossy behavior of the new manager of that projet. Sometimes an older generation car like the Kia Picanta is BOSS, the later ones are meh for... ride one. I do. NOW!! So we have that monster? Simple. Be that being being eaten or that FAST running being. (the lesson for QFST, how to make Transfer from Hi to Fright realistic) 595
596
Now wait you here and see god-dammit Did you see what I did, did you read that headline? That one/two words make the difference in how YOU react. Yeah we know you know, but do you 'understand' enough to sim it on that Cray? If so, send a note and a small CV, no work. To [email protected] So.. Go on. If you have read all other books and have seen at least one red shimmering (that will be tested) you may be in.
597
598
Watch your mouth you tough angry monster beasty U Get that in the line please be all that kind Be that on the till Have we met in full There is just all we get Please be careful that There is so much more to stay U got it baby will you sway Y got that on the mist Tell me baby I confess Please do not till me I am young You got feathers O I am stom That room only makes you SICK Pay the storm ram do the trick Pick a sword and you will fight (at our company, independent research in Groningen, called Nell, we..) 599
600
I am not your friend anymore U Y U P I J K H N L H G G T F F (these are all basic DW 1.03/Cray U.85 states that can be seen, this way) 601
602
If you talk like that you might never be again OK At Nell we have this fierce policy If you talk We know If you walk That is ok If you scheme we know If you treason We prosecute in full force In Station Resah kloytion That means Don't fuck with us Don't want to be nice Stay out of our way and join THAT group Show of Fore The Romans (series 1, whole) (we can already do a lot of stuff, if you join, you can leave without the s.) 603
604
Why are you so tame to me Horse The Horse is dead The rider is in hospital The gate was open The dog ran out The woman was damaged The lie was told That was believed by all but me I have a way to tell now, always Sorry Not. I see an apple tree There is that man under it It is Newton OMG (looking at the history of all important figures takes the fun out and in) 605
606
I live it when you succeed either way I like success I like personal success I like YOUR success Most people do not even look at my success I always thought I was not successful enough That was a mistake that drive me like a horse Now I have some success in New-Land again Someone looked in the shimmer for me objectively I enjoyed 'some' other success. Success is in your own mind Determine what a success is, you always loose Aim for fun, and you mostly win Aim for progress and you halt Aim for growth, you stumble, fall, and always go on After Pavlina I chose conscious growth That has yet to manifest, sort of, watch it buster, I am doing chacra 3 (Well, I liked the Pavlina's until... (privat, personal and embarrassing) 607
608
That is strange and an affront I found this shell That shell a pink one was for a potential date She was called Monique I Courted another M. earlier on People thought and assumed that I was mad for doing so So I went away I courted that other girl, also called Monique, par accident I wrote her my small book 'Isis' In this book... I talk about her, her, her life, what she told My other 'Monique' followed my publisher OMG she thought he is harassing me !!! People make mistakes I am now no longer allowed to date any Monique from the police That is The Netherlands for you Now I date again a woman named R. Ooooooooooh. Now I have done it again (In the Netherlands culture you app. Should listen to all 'others' who to..) 609
610
That is the problem see it MY way... Oh. I have an idea I like to see it my way He has a similar idea He thinks allll those problems belong to him bec. Just because I make a change in one of those ideas Now we have a fight Stay the f. away from my MY idea(s) I ignore and go on like nothing of it Now I have this vendetta He plays the nice guy in the face of my friends I know, he knows, he plays too coy Someone finds out That is away-strategized by shoulders up shoulders down, hu I know these kinds of tactics, I am a coach and trainer He really does NOT understand that I... read body language so well So everything is now denied, and is all well (When you start someth. really new and a Gray a bigger house etc is.. !!) 611
612
Going Outside
613
614
Contents There is this way Being in that coffin Stay outside or die outside The heaven and its pearly doors to underwood Let me tell you this nice way Oh I need that now No I cannot stay that way for long Do not run that sim on that Cray, use that There is another way There is another go That is the game There is that kitchen with that vase What about all that stuff I do not need that stuff I need to feel and look Lookin' good That old castle There is no horse to be seen here Rixan in shimmering So we need some company There is that way The way is next to that There is the door We are going through the door Stay... STAY Standstill Death Room Waste Gate Bye
615
616
There is this way I am in this street. Fierce. Oh. Why in Q. Mech. stufulation am I always on this 'place'/'state' and … on that state. Well, the reason is very simple. I am also a decent philosopher of many sciences. I learned early on, in 1993 that Thomas Kuhn set The book on what a core of a science is, not can be, is. It is a paradigm. A very real example of a already solved (very) first example, that explains more than was explained by others before. So. Other examples follow, more stuff and assumptions come to the fray... the core stays. I am at this place/state. Than what... Now, when I started to think about states in 1995, I sought and looked very hard for a formalism, thinking that there is/was where a solution to my questions should be most clearly represented. I needed to 'represent' a state, with a lot of formal par. That state was/is a whole rat brain slice of a living and dead organism, peptides, transmitters, cell clusters and all, movement in the cleft, NOT decay of the meat, that was beyond the boundaries of the questions. Next state: Another slice in time, or/and space and differentials between all these par. More dopamine in the cleft incr. GABA, or and... and to top it all... an envisionment of all possible states that could follow from any one state, Qualitatively. So the real num. Value of that par. going UP in that time frame, steady, or DOWN... no halt. That was beyond my than conc. grasp. I looked at set theory, I looked at electrodynamics, to nonlinear diff. eq., I looked at reg. diff equations, I implemented stuff in LISP a lot, I looked at ACT-R letting that 'solve' what looking to that rat is, all in the course of understanding reasoning about state change. I went back to sets again, and I was already trained in TM's. I ended with QDE's. 617
618
Being in that coffin So I am 7 and I am looking at that coffin. What has that anything to do with it. When you see real death for the first time, you for the first time realize you are Mortal. The clock starts running. For me that meant, getting that stuff done, first that I need to get done, mostly for others, but in that process, you a bit reprioritize to doing that what you want to do as well. I had ONE prioritity marked out personally before I was really twelve. I had found out so much about the world on my own, I wanted...to known EVEYTHING. That was/is my personal mission: I want to know... anything basically, broad and DEEP. So I went on to become a almost professor, and shied away for going only deep or only specialized. So I ended up again with those rat slices, they are in in my thesis RiD. And the QDE's that model the processes in that structure as well, completely up to social study of science highest degree, and with eery mathematical detail. Before my analytic reasoning model, just talk, a lot of it with all the details, more than I could capture, afterwards.. no more just boxes and down and up scaling arrows, but Differential Equations that can be solved for a whole structure and experiment, IN DETAIL to what and how GABA expresses, e.g., after an injection in that pathway. My point. I found my formalisms: Reasoning about the situation in action speak? What to do and how? Best? John Anderson's ACT-R, together with my analogy rules learned Reasoning about real progress in finding drugs and.. nothing. R. Vos Reasoning about the math./sets of prop. in .. used as a flipboard, diff. Reasoning about states and transitions: B. Kuipers, Qual.D. Eq./QSIM 619
620
Stay outside or die outside In the DW (Dream Weaver) 1.03 eq. Solver if you go Inside, stay just a second, and than go OUTside, you start to shake, than you DIE!!!!!!!!! So. What have we here. In DW, we have the standard/'standard'-'quircky' interpretation of the C.QM equations programmed in excellence. They just WORK. But... do those eq. work? Well. In DW 1.05 (nothing much better but the FT update updated with the latest insights) there are FT eq. visualizations that SCREAM for owwww, death is nasty, I hope, my sim survives.... no So, in DW 1.15 things get interesting (you can choose your version of DW at the prompt (only there) with “version set 1.03 u”. Do not forget the u, meaning, not .. you find out. That programmer knows his users. In DW 1.15 we look around. We see that branch. It hits us. DEAD ! ! ! ! Oh. So, what is the solution? You can set any of the FT eq. with, yes, back again, with memes. So. What about that. How many different possibilities? Do this at random? G O O D L U C K D Y I N G !!!! Do it thinking about first principles, my only take (in 1995 I worked out the basis for state transition, the most time went in modeling, and... fitting in more, getting out more, more big questions, going to CMU under Anderson for a while, yet, in only a few years...all those talks with all those neurophamacysts and all those neurochemicists and all those courses, and all those cities. I needed it Perfect. And fill time...! 621
622
The heaven and its pearly doors to underwood That got me through my time as well, reading this ridiculous amount of books. My then wive read all phantasy, my then friend read and read and read all genres and past (all best) on, I bought and read. In all the free time, tending the kids, the stove, before bed, the garden, the train, not in social interaction. And I hardly talked about it with anyone, because even M.H. Who was and is the brightest and turbo high I.Q was and is always some what oh oh oh about my rural opinions (his uttering) about 'his' topics. He always (seemed) to know better. I only got a better grip on social stuff, but I had a family... and bla bla bla. That whole attitude shut me up in my head. I did my stuff, I re-re-tuned my whole high end audio from the electronics up, I found my total view point in my Comp. Simpl. MA-thesis, I found my total overview in RiD, I got at the end, hardly a worthy handshake. Knotting together stuff that takes 11 (RiD) years to do is NOT explained in 192 or so pages, but take investment and interest. The only one who did was H.d.J. But he was too shy to exclaim that he cared for his wonderful almost always exact details in his formalism variants. He did not like my cases, but was next to J.A an N.T my only real content supporter. And T.K only after reading the whole thesis, with joy, I must add. So. I like all their input. H.d.J. Helpen me getting in insight where I am today. I read about QDE in a journal, not a book, and well looked up the site of Benjamin Kuipers and looked for the best QDE person in the neigberhood. I mailed H. and I visited him on my own stipend, low, in Twente, and had a very intellectual afternoon. Sad to say, he was so into for me too simple physics models for his AI-approach thesis, that I declined further cooperation. I learned the basis form the free ps/pdf of B.K's book on QDE and just used that. The same goes for my interaction with N.T. I wanted to do analogy to explain particular reasoning strategies with/in act-r from FIRST PRINCIPLES, so just what was already in John and C.L. his code base. So I did that myself, I run it with just the old school floppy code from the 1993 Rules of the mind book. I switch back, because, promoting under T.K.? Uhm. Sets. 623
624
Let me tell you this nice way Why am I telling you all this. Well, I took a journey, from a start. I just submitted my FIRST article / paper to the very astute international Journal of Applied Science. I am not a trained physicist. In my first year at University I took, next to the 25 QM and CM books on my own, THREE univ. grade courses at the Physics Department in Utrecht. That can be checked. So, I took, I was the first, finished the first, the whole FOUR years of training in the interdisciplinary Behavioral and Cognitive Neuroscience, with a lot of neuroscience about everything, and to get that down I bought from my PhD stipend literature and instruction in Biochemistry to really understand working of drugs and the folding of the receptor. I had many many talks about that in Groningen, Amsterdam, Utrecht, Antwerpen (Janssen), and Twente.. I worked my PhD, I wanted to excel, and, I did not want to be the best in this and/or that, that is not in me, but I for me, looking in the mirror, I wanted to be able to say I S O L V E D T H A T, myself, in my head mostly, taking in ALL that I know about ANYTHING, incl. Books/literature.. and let my BRAIN do the work, and just UNDERSTAND how a computer (can) do so, so that when it comes down to some serious application, if that does not work, we KNOW where to look for an answer not with a screw-driver, like by that super computer, but with our brain/mind. I am that person since I was three. My still alive father has a bunch of examples where I just look at something, frown deep, do not walk away (not back down) and just make ONE remark, that either works or not. And go OUTSIDE. So. That article. I made an insight in QM that I turned out to have in 1998, and published, that took to 2005 or so, bu most in 2001. In 2002 I left the science field to become this and that. I never stopped thinking but... When I decided in aug. 2017 to start writing again, some this and that... BANG, that insight returned with fighting spirit. I showed it to some friends, well. In thought I showed a application. 'Stege' in pills. !!! 625
626
Oh I need that now So, what about that, I am looking at both my theses, both still in the book shop after,... since 1994, since 2001, it is now 2017... so many years. And, I knew then, bit arrogant, still much to get from BOTH of them. Like my docplayer CV tells, I always take the bird perspective on an ocean of data, assumptions, theories, and let LET my brain work out the Paul Thagard Coherence of it all, and wait, what drops out, as … 'nah' (Emotional Cognition, see P.T. Hot Thought), or ah...! And just mull that over in my whole brain again. If it is conjecture, I store, I KEEP it as said by THAT person, period. If it is observation, and rejected, I DOUBLE KEEP IT as an Anchor for new theory and/or conjecture. That is GOLDEN for also personal growth. For a real scientist, it may mean, a real fight in the hallways. I am individual, so ON I GO. I have been doing that in my mow knowledge high politics jobs since 2002. Take all in, and keeping it to my self. So... what happens when you/I set the goal to take six month to take a clean brain brake wholesome. Meaning (cf. The Artist Way) write till you drop and at some time start to structure... anything you like. I started with a big book, on love, deep love, 266 pages, published, parished, resurfaced, further on, not paper, wordpress, many many wordpress sites with themes, I believe 23, high point Auslage 247 about diggin' in my families past. That might... well. To early to tell. People die in it. Next, my work as a trainer, I did 7 I believe stories, one for young children, writing daily, on a old, very old MacBook 1,1. Just a type writer, basically. I started to write chapters that I published one by one, one big 'Het Overzicht'. Oh, the songs. Almost forgot. I started to write songs on my phone, my iPad, but, I needed to do ONE spread the red book now. Just a bunch, all favorite artists. I used a trick. Pure inspiration. No looking, no asking, just trance... and writing... 400p. Or. Next. The theses. I just thought.. well. I wrote.. the Super Station. Done. 627
628
No I cannot stay that way for long There I went. I started, well my first book in March, dedicated, for.. ahum, next, also dedicated... You know That Works For Me. I dedicated all my books, often in the side-page. This is how that works for me, also for 'The Bezielde Wereld'. I always ALWAYS have ONE, and no more than one intended reader, I dedicate it to, in my mind, and I write the WHOL thing, also RiD with also THEM in mind. That means: I keep on working for my own, with that assignment, that person waits I keep on working late hours and keep in mind what the other does know I, when I stop, need to take care of some time off to shut down, whole When Shut Down, starting up, take 4 minutes, after 30 min. speed train I do no not consolence when I successively fail, just more time, ad inf. I do not care much if I fail within a year. I wait 5 more. Examples en. When I succeed I often are parsec's past the competition (RiD) and... My thesis RiD is ridiculously often misjudged for nu result/simple, but That RiD is dl'd so often each weak at the Gron. UB, that a site is build So, what do I do with all those results in science. I published a first Chapter in Foundations of Science, a further I believe 6 reasonable spinoff even before the thesis came out, and T.K.'s review, yet to much detail for the aim of me, put a lid on it. But the results in concepts stand. When I reread both theses I felt a fire burning. TM's as the guide strings in QM. 629
630
Do not run that sim on that Cray, use that So, How, did you get a hand on a Cray terminal. Simply put? I did not (yet). But I do understand computation down to the metal from the ground up since 1989, when I started my individual physics crusade for getting to really know the physical brain, next to my only two courses Cognitive Artificial Intelligence per trimester in Utrecht. I was interested in HAM radio, build my own 3 meter radio radio transceivers and antenna's, all for social reasons, but I needed to know what whent on in that tin box with the lights, so to speak. I had my first real computer, a Mitsubischi MSX with tape when I was 13/14 and programmed basic in an older group that programmed 'Ceefax' clients for fun so we could do packed radio and Ceefax on 101.5 FM in the town. That was... omg. My next computer a completely decked out Atari ST1, I kept it for years, tried all the programs, and well, I simmed an Apple Plus on it emu-ing MS Word for Mac, I wrote my LaTex code on that layer, double booting to TOS for the Latex parser and viewer, that produced Comp. Simpl. A laugh for me, an opitmization for my worked out brain. I ran physics sims on both layers, and well at Utrecht University we ran MAC II with that lisp, common no less, I aced that. To sim the brain operations. BTW, I did a year business, there I got an account on a bog 'Green” Wargames Wopper style main frame, that I cared to … hack. I had many HacTic's (From Rob Gongrijp, still have them all). So my first big terminals, Macs came and went, mostly Powerbooks, was at Technical Cognitive Science. In Groningen, I went there for fun, and that HP-UX got me down, doing my lisp and batching, but a repairde all P. Thagards stuff to THAT lisp (PI. Echo, JavaEcho) that it could work for courses that I gave many years. Here are the science paradigms, go use your terminal with the manuals I wrote see how Thagards work makes sense of it. It did. Big time. No ooh and Ah. Just. Final remark, I bought a Sony Playstation Yaroze in 1989. I wanted.. Uh. 631
632
There is another way So, when I started at Comp. Simpl. I had 6 months to spend before the money ran out. T.K. Told me friendly, why not tackle why simple (may) be/is a truth indicator. At that time I really wanted my understanding of TM DON to ah a AH I KNOW THAT ALREADY, in any polite and civilized tone. I had met JvM, he did Mathematics at the Amsterdam CWI, under P. Vitanyi. He researched selection process in finding that TM (string) that computed (implied, from the string and a Univ. TM) the observed or inputed string. That made sense. I got and asked more and more and was handed to me a piece by Li & Vitanyi, a kind of overview article, also about Risannen's Minimal Description problem. WOW, all questions in a huge paper with those proofs, also about translation. That whole piece was/is a wonder to me, so much clarity. Yeah, I am not a computer sc. guy and certainly not a math. person, so I needed to re-read it umpteen times, asking Jeroen about every step. I almost bowed down to all three gentleman and thought let this be a math problem and walk out. But. I started to aks J. different questions. I wanted to have him make it visual. That saved my partial insights. Because NOW I could understand why MY phil. of sc. guys I studied as well all went in to tight corners explaining simplicity and it's role in Science, theoretical science that is. I beat the problems of Jeffreys (result) those, all of (Reichenbach on curve fitting) result, those of Popper (wow), those … the WHOLE list.. those of Thagard and H. Simon, almost those of... anyway. It is an amazon.com. So the second part remained. Of the thesis with the yellow cover. So... The second parts was needed for conceptual clean-up. But I just choose to set it all up, guided by the Li & Vitanyi piece, one by one. Still tying stuff in. It made me realize, already at THAT moment, I know it exactly, a TM (string), is basically a continuous set of 'choices'. A TM state, a different one, produces a whole set of different 1 and 0' to the same input string. So? If a string, a whole string is the whole set of your life choices? What are the TM states? Your moods? Further research??? 633
634
There is another go So I look at these TM states. A TM can have say 12 states, and some (complex) numbers can only be stamped out/generated with a TM with AT LEAST 12 states, meaning more necc states, the more complex it is. Right? That scales. What is the whole TM setup, nothing more that computes Pi to the 'last' decimal. You think that is just your calculator. Wrong. Pi an be approximated, but after 10.000.000.000 it goes wrong with ONE bit. Pi is not rational, it is an infinite number, the TM that truly generates PI... IS Pi and a TM that reads the news paper and puts a bit from the inf. Pi tape to the oh you want this Pi place number tape. The same goes for stochastic processes. These are all uncomputable, the next bit/bitstring in ANY simulation is just oh help, let's hold a chair and that our sim doll that emulates life does not DIE again. Again in receptor folding. Drug/transmitter coming in, I spend hours being in neurochemical and neurophamacy labs with mic in hand and too many questions to too many researchers (not just W.T.) and SAW, hey that is wonderful on that SG Indy screen, but...OMG what happened, some peptide? No. It was never clearly explained, but it was usually a first principles problem. Which one of the many many QM/FT formula was not properly attended or was 'maybe' outdated... horrible for the students and professors and the financial backers. Loose. Loose. Loose. Win. The win for the MA/PhD students that said/wrote/ I came/I saw I off course almost WON/ and... this was my set up. Graduation please. Well. I always work out WHAT to program in my head from FIRST principles, is it in Basic, Electronics, I make a flow design, that operates mentally, new formats like Pascal, Prolog and Lisp and Delphi just challenge me more, and make me smarter with new SOLUTION spaces, when I added Java Enterprise with the IBM base in IT, I thought, first this could work in BIOCHEM. But..Cray/Memes/QM/FT? 635
636
That is the game I wrote a whole set of QM themed work up books, that A. show me qualified as a philosopher on QM and that consciousness, and B. show me a 'strange' knowledge hungry wolf, and B. show me as some one that WON'T back DOWN. People important enough at the Rug that know this are F.Zwarts, G.J.t. Horts, S. Poppema, and L. Schomaker. These senior scientists worked with me in policy and/or science and well, still think they got me down enough. I like to surprise. Not all like that in the same magnitude, but still... I wrote about 9 QM books, in a few... uhm time periods. They aim to get the audience warm for the big show. I have been working on putting two careers together and the result to me is clear. All the fine dots are now firmly connected in, in my brain. To understand something, to understand that B follows from A means, that you can (semantically/syntactically) make a found/remembered connection between those two (learned at CMU). Those dots are already there, the connections need to grow. If you read any of those 9 books during coffe you gonna spill and no energy (ATP) is used to grow those Axons... neuroscience truth. You need to sit down, no matter how smart you are, music low, helps a bit for some, and take in a sentence and WORK that sentence in the already connected dots you already have. That goes down to the METAL/NEURONS (not the axons, techn.) That makes you want a paracetamol. DON'T that kills the growth and the needed dilatation of your brain blood vessels. So did I set you up enough. Some people, like 'this former colleague'. I show him the thirst three books, he sees, thinks and says... “philosophy bla bla, I did that at senior years, this is oh different, so WRONG, going on, where are the proofs, only a 'big stelling', ah wrong use of |= or... a. I see it in my mind (all in 5 minutes), that is just (more) sets in a graph, learned that from C.S... He got it write/wrong, still too easy for a 'result', oh QM is states in a tree, oh I read that two pages earlier. Nah. He is no logician, he is a fool, on with... Writing it up.” So new book “The Game” 2017. 637
638
There is that kitchen with that vase What is there to know about the U.85 Cray and that Dream Weaver sim module on it, that come pre-installed in the latest version. Well... Sad thing. I have seen a number of Cray's life, one still in construction. That mad a big impression, The impression was... what the flip needs SO much comp. Power. Water or nukes? Or... huh, a simple flower in in vase that decomposes? I could NOT make sense of it, and the math, for me at that time was bewildering. All those (field) equations, and I keep think that THAT was what they reasoned with. Some do, better results? No. Think of it that/this way. You have 200 files of your personnel at your desk as a middle (important) manager. How to go into that wild celebration party at that wednesday after that fat big new order by WHO again? Drink in ALL the files, and than determine who is worthy for a tab on the shoulder or something? That is American culture but also... You have these 38 field equations from FT, recently new, and the theory people, a lot of woman, put in/replaced three of them. All based on the Classical Q.Mech eq., I believe 243, or so. Those all conceived by mostly native Englishmen, that seemed to matter, also mostly men. Anyway, WHO decides WHAT eq. to set to 0 and what new eq just delivered and heavily argued about goes to 1 or (condition, even more..) That is basically the finest form of Politics an ver Acute science, and a capital venture. Setting that sup. Comp. To a 'set' is an INVESTMENT that most regular users do not get. Say... You have a big new set. That is just say 12 par. changes, that runs worldwide in 4500 terminal with help for a week. That, those 12p. Are a mini research programme. That gets 4500 in a bunch and working round the clock making PREDICTIONS. 639
640
What about all that stuff I am now at that Cray room. Imposing. The room for the cooling, humming, at that University. Unassuming terminal in a three quart circle. All those also ver smart technicians, being still. A sense of revery. There I am, thinking, get this, I once submitted a plan for a game room like this, with coffee in Nijmegen, in an old bank building, there I had the idea, let people interact MMPORG style AND see eacht other, Korea Game room style. Still. This is science. Computers progressed, computation speed progressed, terminals grew beyond CRT and high colors (256K). But... That cray can do differential equations on any time slice CM or CQM in almost any particle resolution. It predicts medical interventions, it predicts integrity of buildings. That is 'thinking'/'computing' about the real world. Still, what is a computational philosopher of science to do, with a back field of running minmax kind of alg. on data sets containting of 5 k of data, and the proofs on that in set theory in 0,01k. Still. If that would work, there is still an unexplored search algorithm in RiD that, if employed on BIG data produces (guaranteed) big new results, new anyway. Sometimes a simpler approach. But look at a TM, or even an UTM, small data base, HUGE string consequence, that just need to be right in any real scienc. field. Or the alg. That continiously improves the appointment of the correct theory/TM, Risannen has something to say, my former friend JvM got something to say (model growth, indiv. Paper). So, I am at that room, I realize I am not going to this room BEFORE I worked out ALL first principles, so when anything gets done with my work, I can solve a douche THERE and THEN. Like some others at that place (Vitanyi). So, that was years ago, my career took a swing due to a thing, and I got into really knowing real people and high politics. Hey! 641
642
I do not need that stuff I need to feel and look Simulating the humanity of any person, is it just doing the QM on the states of the whole body and some flowers, in a vase? Basically? Uhm. YES. You can do a huge amount of research that way. Very enlightening. You can work out even mental disease, problems with the skeleton sytstem, the nerve system, the sims keep dying in three slices but hey. Those are informative. What makes a slice a state, a tuple (QFST) a whole Field (FT) a whole state space representing ONE slice of time about that only green white flower? Huh? What makes it different from the next slice, another huge set of parameters? Where is the continuity? Current solution? Take that slice, check, add a brand new (FT) par. called say 'time'..huh, ok. State 1, the t par. has value, omg 0,01. The second state space to be computed on that Math Lab/Mathematica/DW 1.03, is...uhm lets call it (random) t = 0,07 (we need to hurry up, though. OMG. For QM and QFST and Q.Flux, that means basically and practically, that certain processes are not fed, not tended to for 0,06 seconds, in biochem that is DEADLY. That slicing with that time knife KILLED THE VERY REAL SIMULATION TO DEATH IN THEE SLICES. How to solve that? Well, I submitted a article to the Journal of Applied Physics (2017) with a sim solution. Just changes THEE FT equations (repr. As Gray DW 1.03 Memes) add nothing more, and there you go. The Clown finally lives, and 'Stege' is solved. What did I do? Think from first principles. Does it need to be continuous? No. But between about 10 field (FT) par. there needs to be a gradient solution that is already in FT (by D. Atkinson) but hardly used. Now it is (under review). The sim? !! 643
644
Lookin' good There I am lookin' at that model on that... ow, Powerbook 145! That grey plastic one. I always try to work with the common undernemator. I worked with HP-UX, got the shell vi and the fucking emacs down, and well, batched lisp queries, … series of teksts running round. Yawn. The results, yes that data, given that corpus explained. I even build my own version of BACON.1 (Simon & Langley 1987) in Lisp, in prolog almost even from a code snippet. I tear my problems down to the min. work up up UP the stairs from there on. Of the stairs do not hold up high.. not whining, get AWAY that sh%t, and look further. When I did the final chapters of RiD (Rationality in Discovery, my 2001 PhD all-thesis) I wanted, really wanted to get everything going in just JUST ACT-R also, all the very formal precise logic in both the thinking off theses AND the validation. But the whole brain has an own way to validate (new) assumptions and a not so peculiar way of getting the in (cf. “The 300 Reasons” 2017). In judging ANY real inference, that inference only takes place procedurelized and that procedure, manny can be learned and used, differently, that inference is, implemented in the biochem brain 'choosen' to be used based on a prop. estimation of maximum gain to the GOAL. So... I thought, NOT naïve, the inert ACT-R proc. Determine the smartest way to behavior in all, so also the behavior in what theory to construct, what to test, and what to apply.. boy. THAT IS A RESEACH FIELD. So I focused in RiD, just a few pages text bu weeks of modeling and tuning and understanding in ACT-R how scientist Bacon could come up creatively with those Motion laws for the planets. He learned them, paradigmatically from other examples in math and everyday live, and applied them, first in history to celestial bodies. The (computational/cognitive) psychology is (now) very well understood. Langley did the stuff given the rule skills, I showed, as a real first how Bacon learned those discovery rules Kuhn style, from examples around him and Bacon's understanding in first principles, COUPLED to his goal/AIM to solve that riddle whole. !!! 645
646
That old castle I see a castle (means in DW & M, not ML: there is a big rectangular) I see a vase (means in DW, not M, but in Math L.: that contains fluid, but) I see a table floating (means, all: the par. of gravity is now free to set) I see that table upside down (means: ML: g = 1, M = 0, DW = 0 and/or 1) There is that phase on the ground (means: all kind of things...) The is that girl with rotten teeth (that QS where Rot is availible) That man is now dead (Q end state of the doll figure, smiles, not in DW) There is a castle on fire (The castle is very much on fire, people die) There... The list goes ON. That means, simple ways to set up real exp. On anything, drugs, guns, military, peace crowds, stuff, earth quakes. If ONE of the FT extensions is wrong, or mistyped or faulted in any update, like in DW after 1.03, or QM is set to Y like stuff that conflicts with Y in FT,... that kills the situation to 'segment faults'. That is... a killer for any RP (research Programme). If you let go on that and work on knowing one assumptions is going to really kill someone in a drug discovery process, well, that is SERIOUS business. So. My interest? I found out about data mining, and KI/AI in 1988. I wanted in during my MBA/Technical school first year in Rijswijk. That first polytechnical year gave me the managers look. Goal? Medicine. Doubt?? 647
648
There is no horse to be seen here Now for the big school stuff. I am on that horse. Ridin her is that big dream. She is called Rixan. The horse named Rixan is my prize for getting Nell off the ground. Nell is going to be my fourth this live start up company. My first is : e-didact, a cooperation between me, my wive, some family, John Anderson, and Niels Taatgen. Failed? Carnegie Learning declined. My second: Gettin a game shop / coffee shop after being shot down socially. My parents where all restaurant entrepeneurs. Involved: An Itfirm, very invested, a broker, someone who wanted to hire us the Old Bank in Nijmegen. Failed? The townhouse on regulation about coffee everywhere. The (no) money. My third: The (secret) plan to do biochem metabolic pathways datamining in a community on the web, driven by my alg. From RiD and programmed in Java Enterprise in IBM equip. (I worked there for a while) Failed? Scientist approach declined in interest in use, they rather used there own 'hard disk head' instead of a web interface that could suggest hypotheses and better experiments. Oh. I faltered. Its all about people for me. My Fourth: The Big Idea. I worked in HRM for... The Work Load Company. Five people, young older, seniority network, three programmers for iOS iPad and JAV Enterprise, release schedules, 15 languages, one BIG data ware house in Amsterdam and one in Singapore. Programming done in The Media Centrale with a start team of three. Failed? No apparent interest by the users, miscommunication, abrazenness, money hungriness, and … treason, stealing and using (my personal) code elsewhere, and still doing so. No money to sue, but I know who they are, and well... I try to be the learning CEO here. 649
650
Rixan in shimmering So, now back to HARD reality. This is my view. Currently I am not employed. I like to keep it that way. I was sick ver a long time, but I am going back on stage. Nobody around me seems to notice or takes it serious. They count to seven and say, hey... EIGHT. That is like the Fodor joke. About basketballers coming up the field. Try to predict the length of the next. Long or short. After a while his 8 year old niece, still takes note of every (long) player, and deduces, hey... they are all long, and the next one? Fodor says.. That must be, it has to... the referee comes on,... see he is SHORT. That took Fodor's argument away. My point. People can recover no matter how struck down they are. If you do not like it, I will find other people to work with, just hard feelings. Yes! How many have seen what I can do with that last century Shimmering effect. I even did a song book that way, yesterday. Not familiar? Ok. Familiar/have seen/watched it? How doe THAT happen, in your consciousness. How comes that if you use YOUR memes either omg things happen or nothing. Did I 'found' those of me with..? Explain the recent ones. Can YOU put that in Y? Some (kids) can. Is that funny? Is that for next to TV. In the Shimmer, you 'intent' into the Y space, with par.s that look like the meme set from mostly DW 1.03. That was done in the States by (secret). If you know the language of the memes you can program sims in Y as if Y is a HUGE HUGE HUGE Cray U.100, or something. I found my way on that, and took a 100% perspective/investigation. Well, the use in medicine is unlimited. But, It determines on the correctness of the FT equations. People, I introduces QFST with modules and * to work in that space not on the wonderful crays. Worldwide. And publish away and let exp. chck 651
652
So we need some company I am founding, informally, as of yet this new, brand new, also in sorts, company:
ὴ http://nell.vision
Nell Vision & Industry
Groningen This International Dutch Company aims to set aside that what is needed on a time bases way. Currently 'Stege' receptor folding of Dopamine D1, D2, D3, and the effect of GABA in that folding. Results expected within a year. First Publication: “Stege” 2017.
653
654
There is that way The folding of D3 is as of yet fairly unexplored. It expresses also differently in different Gene situations. Here is what is known now: Nature: The D3 is not that dissimilar form D1, so target and research D1 Physical Review: D3 is mysterious, but.. story (correct) target also D3 The physical Review Letters: D3 and D3 are coupled in slice studies. Y. The guys from Nature: All those psychotics need (our Olanzepine anyway) Nell company: when D3 folds with GABA present it acts like D1, but..? Nell company: when D1 folds with GABA present it act like nothing else Nell company: when D2 folds with GABA present, it acts like a tight lock
655
656
The way is next to that It might seem strange, but when you are familiar with working with just THOSE memes/formulas on your sim program on that SG or … and some guy comes along with a redisch book, saying, well our BRAIN is a quantum computer, but ooo OOOOH the Universe is ALSO a quantum computer that you can program with shit like 'The Secret', I do not care WHAT result you got or what worked, and how many lives spared in suicide in psychiatry, I do NOT want to live in a world where MY science is also done by young people looking at white walls. So... I found that OUT, I published THAT in the New York Times, You did NOT deny it, fraught or not, I am NOT buying drug from YOU. Period. Taking that route would cost any company... going from a garagr to iPod... that that... uhm, that might still work, but. Hmm. Shimmering is old. The oldest shimmers go back to 10.000 year aboriginals, hardly inca's a HUGE Maya base, hence my book ”Maya” (2017). But. The point is psychologically and sociologically valid. Hence. A start up. No money. 'Cray' results DW 1.03 (really the best of all three) to journals. Checkable on real Crays. A patent. An ocrooi. I was politely informed btw that my JAP application idea/innovation was already claimed by a '....', not dearing to personally register it, but, afraid of my future income I would hunt her down. So it is now that patent, after my subm. Two days ago. It got the signer/owner #JR170867, my original JAP submission code, and she some mumbo jumbo about representing that number. That 'Stege' patent is now worth... say a Cray U.100. She means to collect in a year when I publish more, an employee of... she will be found now. With our next result in a month, a building and the latest Cray and five personal, not all academics. So...!
657
658
There is the door I am at a real Cray workstation. The sky is clear blu with a shimmer of … green? That is sign of a par. off, meaning, if you want to run that REAL sim, with the horse and the girl, and singing, oh that Cray. Now... It is common that beside uncanny valley, so much also in color, or ions in the term.room can give a sense of dread. That is diff. in the ML an M. rooms, just big PC's sometimes on a server from this or that. There is that door, what is behind? One of the games of Cray. You walk up, you open up... water? Mayonaise? … more uuh bones? That is done to eliviate dread. To let people become ready for the omg sim room. You need to stay absolutely clear or... you puke, head ache. My point? At Nell Just 8 terminal One big VR room for anyone without the door just the
ὴ logo
One desk, with an Olivetti typewriter (explained) No secretary, paperless office You work there ONCE a day Your shift is no more then THREE hours, pay is commercial, p.p. If you are caught on privileged info theft, immed. prosecution. Fired. 659
660
We are going through the door In Nell, we are not just waiting for opening that door. As soon as the stuff is through, we doe that before hand, each day let it open for an hour, we are gonna data glove/joy stick/vr/SAMSUNGVR our selves IN, and wonder, and push buttons, and find ourselves INSIDE the left toe or on the skin of you...uhm. Welll... Fun? N O... hard work! ..ah. So..
661
662
Stay... STAY The biggest problem at DW 1.03 and the rest? That is Stay. Well, from first principles... that is now put into another set. That was the problem, a constraint entanglement of sorts. No Stay if you do not want it in your sim. So find it. All is explained in the next book by me Nell. Out mid. 2017.
663
664
Standstill Another one. Plug in the hairdresser (with a command, on the prompt it takes ages) Out in the flag Go out Go in Try standstill (all fixed) Hurray...!
665
666
Death If you die all the time, read my next book “The Way of Horus”. Out in 2017.
667
668
Room Get …................... OOO UUUU
TTTTTT OUT OUT OUT !!!
Thats all. Outside is where the phenomena are that live. More on life in Cray DW 1.03 in “Love & New Connections” (2017)
669
670
Waste Garbage collection is a DW 1.03 function only, in 1.04 and bigger it is switched OFF. Find this switch. Garbage is not so nice, g Thats IT. Result, no overheating in BIG room. Less power. More leeway. More. (see lisp machines)
671
672
Gate No, stay away. Not the right time for gate. The gate to Y. Traumatizes!!!
673
674
Bye
I am forming Nell either way. You will know and find out. And more...
Thank you!
675
676
