S2. EMD and RELIEF figures based on individual tubes - PLOS

44 downloads 0 Views 364KB Size Report
EMD and RELIEF figures based on individual tubes. Tube 1 pairwise EMD for training samples. 18. 12. 6. 0 training sample labels. 0. 20. 40. 60. 80. 100. 120.
S2. EMD and RELIEF figures based on individual tubes

Tube 1 prediction

Tube 1 pairwise EMD for training samples 6

18

4

6

0

RELIEF classification score

12

2

0

−2

−4

−6

training sample labels

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

180

testing samples ordered by RELIEF score

Figure S3: EMD and RELIEF analysis of tube 1. (a) Pairwise EMD distance for all training samples. (b) RELIEF scores for testing samples.

Tube 2 prediction

Tube 2 pairwise EMD for training samples 4

18 3

12

0

RELIEF classification score

2

6

1

0

−1

−2

−3

−4

−5

0

20

training sample labels

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

180

testing samples ordered by RELIEF score

Figure S4: EMD and RELIEF analysis of tube 2. (a) Pairwise EMD distance for all training samples. (b) RELIEF scores for testing samples.

Tube 3 prediction

Tube 3 pairwise EMD for training samples 2

18

1

6

0

RELIEF classification score

12

0

−1

−2

−3

−4

training sample labels

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

180

testing samples ordered by RELIEF score

Figure S5: EMD and RELIEF analysis of tube 3. (a) Pairwise EMD distance for all training samples. (b) RELIEF scores for testing samples.

Tube 4 prediction

Tube 4 pairwise EMD for training samples 4

18 3

12

0

RELIEF classification score

2

6

1

0

−1

−2

−3

−4

−5

0

20

training sample labels

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

180

testing samples ordered by RELIEF score

Figure S6: EMD and RELIEF analysis of tube 4. (a) Pairwise EMD distance for all training samples. (b) RELIEF scores for testing samples.

Tube 5 prediction

Tube 5 pairwise EMD for training samples 12

18 10

12

0

RELIEF classification score

8

6

6

4

2

0

−2

−4

−6

training sample labels

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

180

testing samples ordered by RELIEF score

Figure S7: EMD and RELIEF analysis of tube 5. (a) Pairwise EMD distance for all training samples. (b) RELIEF scores for testing samples.

Tube 6 prediction

Tube 6 pairwise EMD for training samples 12

18 10

6

0

RELIEF classification score

12 8

6

4

2

0

−2

−4

0

20

training sample labels

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

180

testing samples ordered by RELIEF score

Figure S8: EMD and RELIEF analysis of tube 6. (a) Pairwise EMD distance for all training samples. (b) RELIEF scores for testing samples.

Tube 7 prediction

Tube 7 pairwise EMD for training samples 6

18

4

6

0

RELIEF classification score

12

2

0

−2

−4

−6

training sample labels

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

180

testing samples ordered by RELIEF score

Figure S9: EMD and RELIEF analysis of tube 7. (a) Pairwise EMD distance for all training samples. (b) RELIEF scores for testing samples.

Tube 8 prediction

Tube 8 pairwise EMD for training samples 5

18 4

12

0

3

RELIEF classification score

6

2

1

0

−1

−2

−3

−4

−5

training sample labels

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

180

testing samples ordered by RELIEF score

Figure S10: EMD and RELIEF analysis of tube 8. (a) Pairwise EMD distance for all training samples. (b) RELIEF scores for testing samples.