Supreme Court judgment on Sabarimala

ENGLISH

த

বাং ল া

മലയാ ളം

िहंदी

मराठी

Follow Us: Monday, October 01, 2018

Home India World Cities Opinion Sports Entertainment Lifestyle Technology Viral Parenting Photos Videos Audio

Home

Opinion

ePaper

Supreme Court judgment on Sabarimala disappointing, will have problematic repercussions

Supreme Court judgment on Sabarimala disappointing, will have problematic repercussions The verdict essentially highlights the chasm that exists between millions of practicing Hindus who live the faith everyday with understanding and reverence on one hand, and the educated elite on the other, who look down upon these masses with a patronising, condescending view.

1K

SHARES

ADVERTISEMENT

SHARE

Updated: September 28, 2018 6:25:41 pm

LIVE BLOG Indonesia earthquake, tsunami LIVE UPDATES: Officials scramble to rescue survivors as toll crosses 800 4 mins ago

W ith PDFmyURL anyone can convert entire websites to PDF!

Krishna Raj Kapoor dies at 87: Bollywood pays tribute 1 hour ago

ADVERTISEMENT

BEST OF EXPRESS PNB fraud: Nirav Modi's assets worth Rs 637 crore seized in five countries Apple executive killing: I have full faith in Yogi govt, says wife after meeting CM The Supreme Court lifted a ban that prevented women and girls between the age of 10 and 50 from entering the famous Sabarimala temple in Kerala, holding this centuries-old Hindu religious practice is illegal and unconstitutional. (PTI photo/File)

Business

RBI data on PSBs: In four years, banks’ writeoff over seven times recovery

Written by Pramod Kumar

Opinion

The Supreme Court’s 4-1 majority verdict on entry of women in Sabarimala temple has come as a disappointment to millions of devotees of Ayyappa. The verdict essentially highlights the chasm that exists between millions of practicing Hindus who live the faith everyday with understanding and reverence on one hand, and the educated elite on the other, who look down upon these masses with a patronising, condescending view rooted in colonial prejudices that seeks to characterise the customs and practices of Hindu faith as regressive and discriminatory. W ith PDFmyURL anyone can convert entire websites to PDF!

its own dangers

SC upheld individual freedom, dignity, equality in Sabarimala case. But statism has

Opinion

The smarter we are, the more likely we are to reaffirm our political biases

Ironically, the sole voice of dissent in this majority verdict was Justice Indu

WATCH NOW

Malhotra, the only woman in the five-judge bench, who observed that there exists a difference between diversity and discrimination. Justice Malhotra’s observations have therefore struck a sympathetic chord with many Hindus like me who feel that her judgment reflects a more nuanced understanding of this conflict between law and faith.

Related News

Apple iPhone XS review: The new iPhone is here in India, but does it live up to

Activist Trupti Desai seeks police security after death threats for hailing SC verdict on Sabarimala Liberty without statism Sabarimala temple: Women entry issue first came up in Kerala High Court 28 years ago

BUZZING NOW Entertainment

Krishna Raj Kapoor passes away

She acknowledges the fact that the Sabarimala shrine and the deity are protected by Article 25 of the Constitution and that the people worshipping there have attributes of a religious denomination. Hence, the court should not interfere unless there is an aggrieved person from that religion or section.

Entertainment

Video shows Tanushree Dutta's car being attacked after leaving Horn Ok Pleassss sets Entertainment

Inside Neha Dhupia's baby shower

Dr Govindappa Venkataswamy remembered with Google doodle on 100th birthday W ith PDFmyURL anyone can convert entire websites to PDF!

Trending

Telangana cop consoles crying baby of female aspirant outside exam centre ADVERTISEMENT

Advocates K Parasaran and Sai Deepak also submitted to the Court why not all exclusion is to be decried as discrimination. There are many other temples of Ayyappa in Kerala and in other States where women are allowed to worship him on a daily basis without any restriction. The restriction imposed on entry of women in Sabarimala is because of the nature of the deity worshipped there as a ‘naishtika brahmachari’ (celibate) and not because of any discriminatory attitude towards women based on biological factors such as menstruation. ALSO READ | SC upholds women’s right to worship at Kerala’s Sabarimala temple Indic Today columnist Angirasa Shreshta correctly highlights the crux of the debate on whether exclusion amounts to discrimination thus: “A full participation in the religion entails not only performing duties, whether W ith PDFmyURL anyone can convert entire websites to PDF!

obligatory or out of your own volition, but also not doing what is prohibited. Negative acts such as abstaining from meat and alcohol on vrata/upavasa days or removing footwear before entering a temple are also instances of religious participation… Similarly, when a woman identified as having reproductive capabilities (for practical purposes, identified as belong to the 10-50 age group), accepts the restriction pertaining to Sabarimala with devotion, she is fully participating in the religion and in the worship of the deity. This “negative” participation by no means less profound and meaningful than the direct, “positive” participation of the men and women of the allowed age groups.” The Sabarimala verdict has placed personal morality and the individual right to equality above the rights of the devotees and the rights of religious institutions which leads to problematic repercussions. For example, if a person argues tomorrow that temples should not insist on removal of footwear or on other forms of ritual purity while entering the temple premises and that this amounts to discrimination against those who cannot maintain such purity, where does this argument lead to? Despite the judgment, millions of women in Kerala who started the #ReadytoWait movement will continue to wait till 50 to have a darsan of their deity. (The author is an Assistant Professor at the Amrita Darshanam International Centre for Spiritual Studies at Amrita University, Coimbatore).

MUST WATCH


EXPERT EXPLAINS: Unpacking the Aadhaar Express For all the latest Opinion News, download Indian Express App Eye for Detail: Making aadhaar mandatory for government schemes is TAGS: Sabarimala still a bad idea

The ExpressGroup Privacy Policy

The Indian Express

Advertise w ith Us

verdict: Can you ask private companies to delete your data? An expert explains.

The Financial Express

Contact Us

Subscribe

Loksatta

Unpacking Supreme Court verdicts on aadhaar, adultery, Sabarimala and the other big stories of the week

Jansatta

inUth

Ramnath Goenka Aw ards

Statutory provisions on reporting (sexual offenses)

Copyright © 2018 The Indian Express [P] Ltd. All Rights Reserved


Apple iPhone XS Max and price of power