May 27, 2009 - Restorative Justice, Gendered Violence and Indigenous Women ... Professor Julie Stubbs, Institute of Criminology, Faculty of Law, University of.
Sydney Law School. Legal Studies Research Paper. No. 06/17. September 2006. Guantanamo Bay and the Annihilation of the. Exception. Fleur Johns.
Melbourne. Law School. Legal Studies Research Paper. No. 269. The Role of Climate Change Litigation in. Australia's Response to Global Warming.
1See Joseph Pechman, Federal Tax Policy 5 (5th ed. 1985). ... Taxation: Principles and Policies 28-32 (6th ed. .... 12See, e.g., Mankiw, Macroeconomics (5th ed.
Electronic copy available at: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1748707. YALE LAW SCHOOL. John M. Olin Center for Studies in Law, Economics, and Public Policy.
June 2006. Revitalizing the Lawyer-Poet: What Lawyers. Can Learn From Rock and Roll. Russell G. Pearce. Professor of Law. 14 Widener L.J. 907 (2005).
Aug 22, 2007 - treaties contain explicit national security exceptions. ... international law does not authorize reading an implicit open-ended exception into.
Law School. Legal Studies Research Paper. No. 243. September 2007. Review of Edwin Vermulst, The WTO. Anti-Dumping Agreement: A Commentary.
Sydney Law School. Legal Studies Research Paper. No. 09/34. May 2009. Intellectual Property in Indonesia: A Problematic. Legal Transplant. Simon Butt.
Sydney Law School Legal Studies Research Paper No. 09/34 May 2009
Intellectual Property in Indonesia: A Problematic Legal Transplant Simon Butt This paper can be downloaded without charge from the Social Science Research Network Electronic Library at: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1401093.
This chapter is in T Lindsey (ed), Indonesia: Law and Society, 2nd edition, Federation Press: Sydney, pp. 620-635, 2008. Information of the book can be found on Federation Press website: http://www.federationpress.com.au/bookstore/book.asp?isbn=9781862876606
Electronic copy available at: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1401093
Intellectual Property in Indonesia: A Problematic Legal Transplant Abstract Since the mid 1990s, Indonesia has significantly reformed its intellectual property laws. These reforms were effected to bring Indonesia’s laws into line with the World Trade Organisation’s Trade Related Aspects of Intellectual Property (TRIPs) Agreement, which requires WTO members to provide minimum standards of intellectual property protection within their domestic legal systems. However, many features of Indonesia’s economic, social, cultural and legal order appear to contradict fundamental precepts of intellectual property. This article argues that, at this stage in its development at least, Indonesia’s best interests are not particularly well served by the higher levels of protection required under TRIPs.
Electronic copy available at: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1401093
