Department of Public Health and Social Work. Tagung der SekFon Soziale Indikatoren der DGS. Subjek ves Wohlbefinden in der Lebensqualitätsforschung.
THE SOCIAL IMPACTS OF THE ECONOMIC CRISIS IN SLOVAKIA: IN WHAT AREAS OF LIFE DO PEOPLE FEEL THE IMPACT OF THE CRISIS? Lukas Pavelek – Kris/na Traegerova University of Trnava Department of Public Health and Social Work Tagung der Sek/on Soziale Indikatoren der DGS Subjek'ves Wohlbefinden in der Lebensqualitätsforschung. Ergebnisse vor dem Hintergrund einer neu belebten Diskussion 19. september 2013 WissenschaKszentrum Berlin für Sozialforschung / Berlin
Introduction • The ques/on if the subjec/ve wellbeing of the popula/on is affected by the crisis and in what way. Also to what content does the situa/on in Slovak republic differ from the EU • Our research consists of two parts. Firstly we performed a secondary analyze of available sta/s/c data. Consequently we conducted semi-‐standardized interviews that were recorded and analyzed. The main research design for this part was grounded theory • At the /me of realiza/on of this pilot study there was not any specific data on subjec/ve well-‐being available in Slovakia except studies about social disparity (Bunčák, 2010) or life enviroment (Džambazovič, 2010). A new study on subjec/ve well-‐being from Central European Labour Studies Ins/tute (CELSI) was published 8.2013
Monitoring the social impact of the crisis: public perceptions in the European Union • Surveys conducted 2009-‐2012 by The Gallup Organiza/on upon the request of Directorate-‐General Employment, Social Affairs and Equal Opportuni/es • Wave 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 • Views on: Existence of poverty, financial difficul/es, changes in health care and social care affordability, expecta/ons about household financial situa/on, future affordability of accommoda/on, employment, future finances.
(2010 data, wave 2)
è
Poverty In 2010-‐2011 around the average levels among EU27 (58% -‐ 61%). In 2012 s/ll under the EU27 average.
è
Poverty In 2010-‐2011 around the average levels among EU27 (58% -‐ 61%). In 2012 the levels increased up to 73%, s/ll not as high as Greece, Hungary Romania, Bulgaria.
Degree of >inancial dif>iculty 2010-‐2011 (waves 2,3,4,5) Slovakia being above average of the EU27, but s/ll not reaching top levels of RO, BG, HU although this indicator also increased in 2012 (26%, EU27 – 18%).
Changes in health care Under EU27 average in the ability of providing health care for the family (also in the long-‐ term). Over EU27 average in childcare. (2011 data, wave 5)
(2011 data, wave 5)
Expectations for the household’s >inancial situation 2010-‐2011 slightly above average compared to EU27. At EU level, the propor/on of respondents who expect their financial situa/on to worsen has risen substan/ally, from 26% in October 2010 to 36% in 2012. For Slovakia it means +14 points.
Future affordability of accommodation Not much changes during the monitored years. For the Slovaks however, it has to be men/oned that 87,5% of the popula/on are homeowners (source: Popula/on Census, portal.sta/s/cs.sk, 2011).
The Employment situation Unemployment in Slovak Republic (2001 – 2013)
Level of con;idence in respondents’ ability to keep their job in the next 12 months (2012 data, wave 6) • Slovakia has the 3rd highest propor/on of respondents who express pessimism about their job security in EU • But this is not a significant shiK in recent years
è
Chances of >inding a new job Slovakia scores over the EU average. (2012 data, wave 6)
è
Concerns about futue >inances The level increased significantly between 2010 -‐ 2012 (+13 points), but increase is recorded overall at the EU level.
Subjective well-‐being (source: OECD in Numbers and Facts 2010) Representa/ve samples in countries (about 1000 people) – but bias admimed
Life satisfaction in Slovakia (source: oecdbetterlifeindex.org)
• When asked to rate their general sa/sfac/on with life on a scale from 0 to 10, Slovaks gave it a 5.9 grade, lower than the OECD average of 6.6. • Limle gender differences: Men gave their life a 6.0 grade and women 5.9 • Significant educa/on differences: primary educa/on (life sa/sfac/on level of 5.6) -‐ ter/ary educa/on (6,7) • In the Slovak Republic 75% of people reported having more posi/ve experiences in an average day (feelings of rest, pride in accomplishment, enjoyment, etc) than nega/ve ones (pain, worry, sadness, boredom, etc). This figure is lower than the OECD average of 80%.
Methods • Can we iden/fy in what way is the sample affected by the crisis? How did the life situa/on of the par/cipants change? • 18 semi-‐structured interviews • 3 regions, different overall levels of unemployment • Grounded theory • This research was considered as a pilot study with the goal to receive funding for a future project on measuring the effects of the crisis on the popula/on and to determine a suitable way of measuring subjec/ve well-‐being
Results Talking about the crisis
• Lack of money, unemployment, “conspira/on”, not ready to commute or move, euro, high costs of living, skep/cism, personal problems, nostalgy, blaming the authori/es, stressing solidarity, leaving the country, lack of belief in the European authori/es
Quotes The crisis is only a fake to fool the society. All the banks got the money (P7). We do not have anything that is made in Slovakia (…) we got factories but they are all German, Korean, Japanese…(P11). Life was beau/ful when I was a kid, we had everything, I do not know what happened (P4). People should help others more than themselves (P5). We should not help Greece, give them milions or miliards we should invest in our companies (P9|.
Results Talking about unemployment, bills payment, subjec've life situa'on
• Contracts, public works programs, cuung life expenses • Limita/ons – bemer than unemployment, insecurity, undeclared work,
Quotes The income of the whole family is enough.. but very /ght (P2). My daughter pays for my living, before that I was. So basically we switched (P12). I got 300 Euro, 200 is my rent, well that is it (P4). I know we are not doing good but we are not doing bad, I guess (P7 – 700 Euro monthly income for a household of 2). I can not afford to be sick (P2). No trips, no dinners, basic needs (P15).
Results Talking about the employment market
• Lack of jobs, possible exploita/on on the market, clientelism, bureaucra/c barriers • Since jan. 2013 new rules leading to employers laying off people with temporary contracts • Feelings of insecurity, limita/on
Quotes I could work but I would have to commute and I can not (P15). The say they are sa/sfied with my work, but they do not want to give me a full /me contract (P6). I worked 188 hours and my employer paid me 156. He said if I do not like it I can go (P16). I worked 16 years for the Slovak Commercial Inspec/on (…) now if employers read that they say “oh, we do not need a spy here!” (P17).
Results Talking about family and friends, housing
• Social support, social capital, reciprocity • Mul/genera/onal households • Stressing the role of the family, helping ethics
Quotes I take my daughters kids to school (…) I take care of my mother, she sits in a wheelchair (…) I feel like I am needed (P13). I feel responsibility towards my parents (P14). I do not have friends, basically only colleagues (P6). I have a daughter, she is married and has kids, but she told me I can come and live with her any/me I need (P4).
Results Talking about health and psychic
• Par/cipants claiming worsen health aKer loss of work, claiming about stress, not taking a lot of drugs and not visi/ng the physicians oKen
Quotes I need to take bemer care about myself (P2). I would love to play my part in the society but it somehow seems not to work (P7). I never had anything like that in my life but now I am afraid that if I do not pay my rent I get kicked out on the street (P4). Since I lost my job, my sleeping habits got worse (P16).
Results Talking about future and expecta'ons
• Almost all answers in this cathegory reflected topics of employments and family
Quotes I just need a job, everything else will manage by itself (P6). I would like to do something. Bu I do not know what (P11).
Discussion and conclusion • The pilot study showed that there are common areas in studying the effects of the crisis on a EU level and in Slovakia, however we assume that some areas should be studied specifically • Geographical differences, employment market, different housing situa/on, prejudices
Unemployment
Status change
Employment market
Future expecta/ons
Family and friends
Health and psychic
Thank you for your attention. Lukas Pavelek, PhD. University of Trnava Univerzitné nám. č.1 918 43 Trnava Slovak Republic
hmp://www.pavelek.sk