The Weekly Letter - Merrill Lynch

4 downloads 227 Views 159KB Size Report
Jul 5, 2017 - CHIEF INVESTMENT OFFICE. The Weekly ... Gold fell 0.9% to end at $1,245.52 per ounce. ... oil investment are also factors, and in Russia.
CHIEF INVESTMENT OFFICE

The Weekly Letter JULY 5, 2017 Authors

Lower for longer oil: The surge, and potential surge, in global oil production capacity this year and next imply either more inventory accumulation or substantially bigger OPEC supply cuts and growing spare capacity. We believe both are consistent with loose market conditions and prices of at most $50 per barrel for the foreseeable future. For now, the market is dealing with excess supply that is difficult to sweep under the rug.

GWIM Chief Investment Office

Markets in Review: Last week through Thursday equities were mixed, with the S&P 500 down 0.7% and international equities, as measured by the MSCI EAFE Index, up 0.4%. Bond prices moved notably lower, with the 10-year Treasury yield up 13 basis points to 2.27% from 2.14% on Friday of the prior week. Commodities, as measured by the Bloomberg Commodity Index, rose 2.1%, helped by WTI crude’s 4.5% increase to $44.93 per barrel. Gold fell 0.9% to end at $1,245.52 per ounce.

Recent Publications Weekly Letter Volatility and Market Risks This market has FAANGs Japan: A Summer Rally? The New Silk Road

Looking Ahead: Next week is jobs report week in the U.S. In addition, a measure of activity in the service sector is expected. In Europe, the retail sales report is due, which may provide further confirmation on an economic recovery there.

Lower for longer oil OPEC’s agreement with 11 additional countries to withhold oil from the market in an attempt to engineer a decline in inventories helped sustain prices into the early part of this year. Many analysts extrapolated the improving price trend and predicted levels of more than $60 per barrel for 2017 and 2018. However, as demand surprised to the downside in the first quarter and supply started to surprise to the upside, these cuts started to look insufficient to shrink global inventories as desired. An upward revision to 2017 non-OPEC supply estimates, mainly in the U.S., coupled with a similar output gain in Libya since May have thrown cold water on hopes for a meaningful tightening of the oil market anytime soon. Nigeria has also started to show signs of greater stability and rising oil flows as a result of renewed government appeasement of Niger Delta militants. The surprise increase in the combined supply of these two countries has played a big role in depressing oil prices recently. If sustained, this gain would offset 25% of OPEC’s self-imposed cutback, watering down the cartel’s effort to support prices. What’s more, at 4.5 million barrels per day (mbd) in recent months, Iraqi supplies continue to defy expectations. The government targets a whopping 5 mbd production capacity this

Monthly Letter Value and the Style Cycle ISC Viewpoint A June Prune Not a Swoon

Exhibit 1: The U.S. oil rig count may have gotten ahead of itself Oil Rig Count Rig Count Estimated Based on Oil Prices 16 Weeks Before 1,800 1,600 1,400 1,200 1,000 800 600 400 200 0 2012

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

Sources: Baker Hughes; U.S. Trust® Macro Research Team. Data as of June 22 2017. Past performance is no guarantee of future results.

year, which would be about two years sooner than assumed by the International Energy Agency in its 2017 mid-term oil report. U.S. crude production has surprised to the upside too. Shale oil production has shown its adaptability and responsiveness to the oil price environment. Plunges in rigs and production accompanied the collapse in prices from mid-2014 to early 2016, but they have retraced most of these declines as drilling surged over the past year. Gains have slowed, however, and drilling has gotten ahead of itself, in our view (see Exhibit 1),

Merrill Lynch Wealth Management makes available products and services offered by Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated (MLPF&S), a registered broker-dealer and Member SIPC, and other subsidiaries of Bank of America Corporation (BofA Corp.). Investment products: Are Not FDIC Insured

Are Not Bank Guaranteed

© 2017 Bank of America Corporation. All rights reserved.

May Lose Value

given its past relationship to prices and the recent price declines. Going forward, it’s not a given that shale oil producers will cut production as rapidly on declining prices, since improving technology has been bringing down the price at which they can break even, keeping production potentially profitable at lower and lower price points.

rising standards of living in developing countries. For example, a small but rising coal-to-liquids supply is eroding the market share for crude. Growing use of biofuels and increasing electric vehicle penetration will replace some of the demand as well. So will ongoing efforts to release more Saudi Arabian oil for export by switching to natural gas for domestic power generation.

Against this backdrop, inventories appear likely to decline only about half as much as OPEC intended. While OPEC discipline may reduce inventories somewhat, it also works to substantially boost surplus capacity this year and next, still depressing expectations for prices.

Expanding fuel-efficiency standards in developing countries have an even greater potential to curtail growth in oil demand despite still-low per-capita consumption, great pent-up demand and relatively faster economic growth.

Supply resilience in the face of relatively low prices also reflects the large global investments made during the period of high oil prices, such as those in Brazil, Canada and Kazakhstan, which are still seen adding to supply through 2019. Moreover, the application of new technology to aging fields around the world precludes some previously anticipated production declines from materializing, especially in Brazil, where policies more favorable to oil investment are also factors, and in Russia. In sum, the surge, and potential surge, in global production capacity this year and next imply either more inventory accumulation or substantially bigger OPEC supply cuts and growing spare capacity, both consistent with loose market conditions and prices of at most $50 per barrel for the foreseeable future. The market is basically dealing with excess supply that is difficult to sweep under the rug.

Demand unlikely to come to the rescue U.S. and global demand growth showed more sensitivity to the drop in oil prices from 2014 to 2016 than generally had been anticipated, massively surprising to the upside in 2015 and 2016 with gains of 2.2% and 1.7%, respectively. The reverse has also been true. The 55% year-over-year price gain in the first quarter constrained oil consumption growth to a disappointing 1% from year-ago levels by keeping developed-world consumption flat and emerging-market demand subpar. Notwithstanding the weak start of the year, world oil demand is still seen up 1.3% on average this year and another 1.5% in 2018 as a result of faster global growth, softening oil prices and a strong rebound in the growth of Indian demand as the country recovers from its demonetization-related setbacks. While strengthening demand after the soft first quarter would be welcome, it would take even greater reacceleration than is currently estimated to mitigate the downside pressure on prices coming from higher-than-expected supply. The change in the mix of global fuel supply mitigates upside oil demand and price pressures coming from global growth and CIO REPORTS • The Weekly Letter

As a result, we maintain our assumption of about 1.2% to 1.3% growth in the average global demand for oil over the next four to five years. For a higher oil price trajectory, adjustments will likely have to take place on the supply side of the equation. The BofA Merrill Lynch (BofAML) Global Research commodities team points out that demand growth has undershot expectations in the first half of this year, removing support for prices just when they needed it most. The team also finds that global oil consumption growth tends to be lower at times of rising U.S. real interest rates and a flattening yield curve. Thus, the tighter monetary policy bias in both the U.S. and China against a backdrop of weaker economic data poses downside risks to oil demand and prices. As a counterweight, the sharp drop in prices so far this year should eventually spur demand. In sum, the OPEC agreement with only modestly rising demand suggest that oil inventories may decline slightly this year. Large production capacity gains in 2017 and 2018 greatly diminish the need for further additions after 2019, however, suggesting a relatively well-supplied oil market for longer than we had anticipated and at lower prices than we had expected just three months ago. With surplus capacity likely to start meeting some demand within two years, prices should eventually return to an upward trend. We expect a range of $40 to $50 per barrel to help the market digest the surge in supply in 2017 and 2018 and adjust expansion plans for 2019 and beyond. Portfolio Considerations: Energy was the best-performing S&P 500 sector last year but the biggest loser among them in the first half of 2017. We expect steady crude oil prices, recovering earnings and low valuations to improve returns as the year progresses. Key variables to watch include U.S. regulatory measures that could increase drilling on federal lands and boost domestic production, as well as any adjustments to OPEC policy that could further increase global supply. But our central case remains for a narrowing of the deficit in Energy sector returns as the year progresses.

2

Rodrigo C. Serrano Vice President

Markets in Review Trailing Economic Releases

Equities

„„The

Bureau of Economic Analysis reported that its Personal Consumption Expenditure (PCE) Core Price Index increased 0.1% month-over-month (MoM) in May, while the prior month was revised downwards from 0.2% to 0.1%. May’s result was above the flat estimate from BofAML Global Research but in line with the consensus. The index rose by 1.4% yearover-year (YoY), below the Federal Reserve’s target rate of 2.0%.

„„The

University of Michigan released the final reading of its Consumer Sentiment Index for June. The result of 95.1 was above the preliminary reading and the estimate from BofAML Global Research of 94.5. While it’s still high, sentiment has moderated since hitting a multi-year peak in January, due in part to gridlock in Washington.

„„The

European Commission reported economic confidence for the region for June at 111.1, up from 109.2 and a recent multi-year peak of 109.7 in April. That was better than BofAML Global Research’s forecast of 108.8. Receding political risk and an improving economy have raised sentiment.

S&P 500 Sector Returns (as of last Thursday’s market close) S&P 500 Sector Total Returns (as of last Thursday's close)

DJIA NASDAQ S&P 500 S&P 400 Mid Cap Russell 2000 MSCI World MSCI EAFE MSCI Emerging Mkts

0.3% -0.5% -0.5% -0.7% -0.9% -1.3% -1.4% -1.4% -2.2% -2.8% -4%

-3%

-2%

-1%

0%

1%

2%

3%

4%

Total Return in USD (%) WTD MTD YTD -0.5 1.4 9.0 -1.9 -0.8 14.8 -0.7 0.5 9.2 0.1 1.5 5.8 0.2 3.5 5.1 -0.2 0.5 10.8 0.4 0.5 14.6 0.4 1.3 18.8

Fixed Income Yield (%) ML US Broad Market ML 10-Year US Treasury ML US Muni Master ML US IG Corp Master ML US HY Corp Master

2.48 2.27 2.31 3.18 5.65

Total Return in USD (%) WTD MTD YTD -0.4 0.1 2.5 -0.9 -0.3 2.6 -0.5 -0.2 3.4 -0.4 0.4 4.0 0.3 0.1 4.9

Commodities & Currencies

Bloomberg Commodity WTI Crude $/Barrel1 Gold Spot $/Ounce1

Level 165.1 44.9 1,245.5

Level EUR/USD USD/JPY

Current 1.14 112.18

3.4%

Financials Energy Consumer Discretionary Materials Industrials Real Estate Consumer Staples Telecom Healthcare Utilities Information Technology

Level 21,287.0 6,144.4 2,419.7 1,744.0 1,416.2 1,919.6 1,895.8 1,014.0

Total Return in USD (%) WTD MTD YTD 2.1 -1.7 -6.7 4.5 -7.0 -16.4 -0.9 -1.8 8.1 Prior Prior 2016 Week End Month End Year End 1.12 1.12 1.05 111.28 110.78 116.96

Source: Bloomberg.1 Spot price returns. All data as of last Thursday’s close. Past performance is no guarantee of future results.

Looking Ahead Upcoming Economic Releases „„On

Thursday, the Institute for Supply Management will release an indicator designed to measure the degree of growth or contraction in the service sector. The Purchasing Managers Index for June is expected to rise marginally to 57.0 from 56.9, according to BofAML Global Research, indicating continued brisk growth.

„„On

Friday, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics releases its payroll report for June. BofAML Global Research estimates that 185,000 net jobs were created, that wages increased by 0.3% MoM, and that the unemployment rate remained steady at 4.3%.

„„In

the Eurozone on Wednesday, Eurostat will report growth in retail sales for the bloc. BofAML Global Research expects a YoY increase of 2.2%, moderating from 2.5% in the month prior. A betterthan-expected reading would further confirm improving economic conditions and raise expectations of further announcements of plans for the European Central Bank to reduce monetary stimulus.

BofA Merrill Lynch Global Research Key Year-End Forecasts S&P 500 Outlook Target

2017 E 2,450

EPS

$129.00

Real Gross Domestic Product

2017 E

Global

3.5%

U.S.

2.1%

Euro Area

1.9%

Emerging Markets

4.6%

U.S. Interest Rates 

2017 E

Fed Funds (eop)

1.38%

10-Year T-Note (eop)

2.85%

Commodities

2017 E

Gold ($/oz-period average)

$1,276

WTI Crude Oil ($/bbl-eop)

$47.00

All data as of last Thursday’s close. CIO REPORTS • The Weekly Letter

3

CHIEF INVESTMENT OFFICE Christopher Hyzy

Chief Investment Officer Bank of America Global Wealth & Investment Management

Mary Ann Bartels

Karin Kimbrough

Niladri Mukherjee

Head of Merrill Lynch Wealth Management Portfolio Strategy

Head of Investment Strategy Merrill Lynch Wealth Management

Director of Portfolio Strategy, Private Banking & Investment Group (PBIG) and International

Nicholas Giorgi

Emmanuel D. Hatzakis

Marci McGregor

Rodrigo C. Serrano

John Veit

Vice President

Director

Director

Vice President

Director

The opinions expressed are those of the Global Wealth & Investment Management Chief Investment Office (GWIM CIO) only and are subject to change. While some of the information included draws upon research published by BofA Merrill Lynch Global Research, this information is neither reviewed nor approved by BofA Merrill Lynch Global Research. This information and any discussion should not be construed as a personalized and individual recommendation, which should be based on your investment objectives, risk tolerance, and financial situation and needs. This information and any discussion also is not intended as a specific offer by Merrill Lynch, its affiliates, or any related entity to sell or provide, or a specific invitation for a consumer to apply for, any particular retail financial product or service. Investments and opinions are subject to change due to market conditions and the opinions and guidance may not be profitable or realized. Any information presented in connection with BofA Merrill Lynch Global Research is general in nature and is not intended to provide personal investment advice. The information does not take into account the specific investment objectives, financial situation and particular needs of any specific person who may receive it. Investors should understand that statements regarding future prospects may not be realized. Investing involves risk, including the possible loss of principal. No investment program is risk-free, and a systematic investing plan does not ensure a profit or protect against a loss in declining markets. Any investment plan should be subject to periodic review for changes in your individual circumstances, including changes in market conditions and your financial ability to continue purchases. Investments in foreign securities involve special risks, including foreign currency risk and the possibility of substantial volatility due to adverse political, economic or other developments. These risks are magnified for investments made in emerging markets. Investments focused in a certain industry may pose additional risks due to lack of diversification, industry volatility, economic turmoil, susceptibility to economic, political or regulatory risks and other sector concentration risks. There are special risks associated with an investment in commodities, including market price fluctuations, regulatory changes, interest rate changes, credit risk, economic changes and the impact of adverse political or financial factors. Asset allocation, diversification dollar cost averaging and rebalancing do not ensure a profit or protect against loss in declining markets. Neither Merrill Lynch nor any of its affiliates or financial advisors provide legal, tax or accounting advice. You should consult your legal and/or tax advisors before making any financial decisions. The investments discussed have varying degrees of risk. Some of the risks involved with equities include the possibility that the value of the stocks may fluctuate in response to events specific to the companies or markets, as well as economic, political or social events in the U.S. or abroad. Bonds are subject to interest rate, inflation and credit risks. Investments in high-yield bonds may be subject to greater market fluctuations and risk of loss of income and principal than securities in higher rated categories. Investments in foreign securities involve special risks, including foreign currency risk and the possibility of substantial volatility due to adverse political, economic or other developments. These risks are magnified for investments made in emerging markets. Investments in a certain industry or sector may pose additional risk due to lack of diversification and sector concentration. Investments in real estate securities can be subject to fluctuations in the value of the underlying properties, the effect of economic conditions on real estate values, changes in interest rates, and risk related to renting properties, such as rental defaults. There are special risks associated with an investment in commodities, including market price fluctuations, regulatory changes, interest rate changes, credit risk, economic changes and the impact of adverse political or financial factors. Income from investing in municipal bonds is generally exempt from federal and state taxes for residents of the issuing state. While the interest income is tax exempt, any capital gains distributed are taxable to the investor. Income for some investors may be subject to the federal alternative minimum tax (AMT). Past performance is no guarantee of future results. © 2017 Bank of America Corporation. All rights reserved. 

AR73PKSC